79 PAC PAC 1997 PAC 2011 PAC PAC 2002 20 2 10 10 PAC PAC 1997, 2002 2 1 PAC 2010 PAC PAC 2 PAC 3 1 PAC
80 64 2011 5 28 1 14 80 6 9 5 20 50 14 1 5 12 7 2 7 10 7 20 2 b 10 cm, 3 cm 1 2 1 10 1 20 2 10 20 20 10 20 20 1 2 14 6 10 20 1 15 30 2008 PAC 10 20 10 10 100 1 10 45 Let s Stat! Pro PAC 20 10 14
PAC 81 PAC 1 a. b. c. 2 d. e. f. 3 g. h. i. j. 4 PAC k. l. 10 20 1 3 4 PAC 14 M1M9, F1F5 4 a l 14 14 7 5 4 3 1 11 10 7 C M1 C M2 C M3 C F1 C M4 C M5 C M6 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 1 2 3 BBQ 4 1 2 3 1 2 1 2 3 4
82 64 12 20 7 C F2 C M7 C F3 C F4 C M8 C F5 C M9 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 1 2 1 2 3 4 1 FAO 2 1 2 3 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 M F C 2 9 20 17 9 8
PAC 83 F3 M8 10 2, 5 1 1 1 a. a1 al. M2 M4 a3 a4. M4 a2 a5. F5 a2. M4 a3. a6. M7
84 64 b. c2. F3 b1. 1 M1 b2. F1 b3. F1 b4. F5 c. c1. M1 c3. F4 c1 c4. F1 c5.
PAC 85 F4 2 2 d e f d. d1 d4 d5 d1. 3 F1 d2. M4 d3. M5 d4. 3 M6 d5. 1 2 M7 d6. 1 M9 d7. F1 e. 1 e1.
86 64 M3 e2. M5 e3. F5 f1. F1 f2. F1 e4. F5 e5. M7 f. f3. 3 F3 f4. M5
PAC 87 f5. F4 f6. F4 f7. M2 3 g. g1. M2 g2. M7 g3. M8 g4. M8 g5.
88 64 F4 g6. BBQ F1 h. h1. M2 h2. M6 h3. F4 h4. F4 h5. 3 2 F4 h6. F4 i. i1.
PAC 89 M3 i2. M2 i3. M2 M9 j. i7 i4. M2 i5. F2 i6. M8 i7. F5 i8. F5 i9. j1. M2 j2.
90 64 M8 j3. M9 j4. F5 1 3 14 PAC 1 3 1 2 3 12
PAC 91 12 1 30 4 2011
92 64 2010 4 2 4 PAC PAC 2002 14 PAC 14 1 30 PAC PAC 1 1 PAC 14 k. k1 k1. 2 M1
PAC 93 k2. M4 1 1 M4 2 PAC 1 k3. F2 PAC k4 k4. F3 l. 10 20 14 7 10 7 20 10 20 7 10 20 10 10 10 10 20 20 20 20 2 20 20 1
94 64 1 1 l1. 10 M7 l2. 10 F3 l3. M9 20 10 20 7 2 10 20 PAC 2 PAC 10 7 10 20 7 10 20 6 7 1 17 1 10 7 10 3 48 20 7 10 2 23 20 6 20 5 49 10 10 10 7 U 5 10 10 1 20 10 20 F3 M8 20 10 2011 23520201, PAC 14 PAC 1997 PAC 2002 PAC
PAC 95 2008 PAC ver. 20080324 2011 PAC 63, 4964. 2009 59, 2334.
96 64 Understanding the Minds of Bug-Eating Using the Personal Attitude Construct PAC Analysis YOSHIMURA Hirokazu, SEKIGUCHI Hiromi, and UCHIYAMA Shoichi Abstract We attempt to make clear the mentality of bug-eating by using a psychological interview technique, PAC analysis. By encouraging the participants to produce a large number of associations and by cutting down the number of pair-comparisons imposed on them, we altered some parts of the original method of PAC analysis. Fourteen men and women who are the members of Konchu-Ryori Kenkyukai Insect Cuisine Club, Japan which is presided by S. Uchiyama, one of the authors, participated in the present research. They verbalized lots of valuable comments concerning bug-eating in the interview sessions of PAC analysis. We categorized them into three groups; meaning of bug-eating and the club meeting for him/her, taking account of non-bugeaters eyes, and the bug-eating as a worthy activity. Based on the participants comments and the time needed to complete the 10 or 20 associations, we also discussed the methodological problems of the altered PAC analysis.