60.0% 40.0% 28.4% 31.7% 36.2% 43.0% 48.4% 50.5% 52.5% 20.0% 0.0% 1953 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
1 2 20
p
60% 30% 0% 6.9% 5.8% 1.8% 1.8% 1 32.2% 19.6% 12.3% 14.5% 12.0% 12.3% 3.6% 1.4% 1.8% 1.4% 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 43.5% 13.0% 11.2% 3.6% 0.4% 0.7% 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 60% 30% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 p
7 5 3 5.9 4.6 20 (9, 15) 5.4 5.3 30 (34, 28) 5.9 6.0 6.1 * 40 (26, 34) 5.8 50 (33, 32) 6.5 5.9 6.0 6.1 6.3 5.4 * 60 (31, 34) (46, 57) (87, 86) p
p 60% 30% 0% 6.3% 0.0% 13 (16, 13) 4 (7, 9) ** * 59.3% 11.1% 5 6 7 810 (50, 39) (15, 19) (18, 36) (27, 27) 4 2 0 2.1 1.6 13 (16, 13) 4 (7, 9) *** ** 3.4 3.0 5 6 7 810 (50, 39) (15, 19) (18, 36) (27, 27) 20 20 8 4 4.8 4.6 *** ** 6.4 6.1 0 13 (16, 13) 4 (7, 9) 5 6 7 810 (50, 39) (15, 19) (18, 36) (27, 27) 20 p
p
20
Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education Quality of American Life Questionnaire Beauty Pays: Why Attractive People Are More Successful
American Economic Review Mirror, Mirror... : The Importance of Looks in Everyday Life Social Capital Social Psychology Quarterly The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty Are Used Against Women