Taro10-プレス用概要（ハイブリッ
|
|
|
- ふじよし かいじ
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 10
2
3
4
5 ATS
6 How For What 1
7 13 2
8
9 12 7 4
10 NPM NPM 5
11 NPM 6
12 MBO: Management by Objectives 7
13 State of Iowa (1998) Budgeting for Results Handbook. SMART Specific Measurable Ambitious Realistic/Relevant Timed Performance Measurement 8
14 1960 DC Joseph S. Wholey Harry P. Hatry Reinventing Government 1994 GPRA 4 (2001) 1(2). William R. Shadish, Thomas D. Cook and Laura C. Leviton (1991) Foundations of Program Evaluation: Theories and Practice, Sage Publication. 9
15 GPRA GPRAGovernment Performance & Results Act of Strategic Plan Mission Strategic Goals Performance Plan Performance Goals Performance Measures DOT DOT Strategic Plan DOT Performance Plan/Report USAID Direct Agreed Practical Reliable Objective Useful ASPA (2000) (2001) 10
16 Policy Analysis Policy Assessment Regulatory Impact Assessment 2001 Regulatory Reform Act of Compliance Cost Consultation 100 DTLR DTLR 11
17 Program Evaluation GAO GAO TBS Results for Canadians RMAFResults-based Management and Accountability Frameworks RMAF RMAF 2 Relevance= Success= Cost-Effectiveness= Transport Canada 5 56 TBS 12
18 GAO GAO with/without U.S. GAO (1998) Performance Measurement and Evaluation: Definitions and Relationships, GAO/GGD
19
20 15 PI ( ) ( )
21
22 8 5 17
23 13 ODA Policy Issue 18
24 H1292.6% H18100% H124% H1870% H747% H17100%
25 20
26 ,
27
28 ATS
29 IT 107 EDI IT 109 IT 110 ETC 79 ITS
30
31
32 27
33
34
35 NPM NPM
36 10 PI Family of Measures 10 strategy mission vision 2002 GPRA strategic objectives corporate management strategy 31
37 Porter Michael E. Porter (2002) What is Strategy? Harvard Business Review OnPoint Article. (Charan & Colvin 1999) 2001 TQMTotal Quality Management TQM (Government Executive) TQM 32
38 Ram Charan and Geoffrey Colvin (1999), Why CEOs fail Fortune June 21. (2001) Government Executive, Fdederal Performance Report Card, 11 GPRA (The President s Management Agenda) GPRA Performance Budgeting 10 OMB 33
39 2 26 NSF Office of Management and Budget, U.S. Budget FY GPRA 10 34
40 12 12 BSC Balanced Scorecard Robert Kaplan David Norton 1996 Strategy-Focused Organization JP GE
41 cascading KPI MBO Organization & Change Framework Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton (2002) Strategy-Focused Organization, HBS Publishing 36
42 13 37
43 (1) (2) 38
44 14 Participatory Evaluation ODA 14 5, NPO 39
45
46
47 42
48
49 44
50
51
52
53
54
55 GAP
56
57
58 GAP
59 ()
60
61
62
63 ,500ha / GAP
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98 2,000 CO2 CO ) 60% % 13 7 / 860 kl 17 60% 30% ( GAP) ( ) 17 60% ( )
99 2,000 COP7 14 CO2 1/ % CO2 90% 10
100
101
102
103
104 7
105
106
107
108
109
110 ) ) ) 18 ) 17
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118 , ,384 GAP
119
120
121
122 1 ha
123
124 ( ) 25) 105)
125
126 12 42
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138 20 11
139 11 11
140 VFM PFI VFM
141
142
143
144 2
145
146 1 14 2,
147
148
149 ,791 14
150 ,588 14
151 100 ha H H ,588
152 500m 3 300m 3,000m 3 1,000m ,588
153 ,500
154 ( ) ( ) 14 5,
155
156
157
158
159 ()
160
161 ,
162 (1) 14 (2) 13 (3)
163
164 2, COP ,857 2,900 2, ( 2 )
165 14
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174 1
175
176
177 ( )
178
179
180
181
182
183 .2.(2)2.
184
185
186 ATS 10 B/C
187 SMART 116
188
189
190 119
191 120
192
193 ,
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233 1,
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270 IT ALOS PRISM VLBI GPS GIS 199
271
272 NPM 1993 GPRA GPRA GPRA 14 3 DOT HUD GAO GPRA
273 NPM NPM NPM 202
274 14 1 Q&A NPO WAAV NPM 203
275 NPM
橡25渡辺航.PDF
1 NPR 1 NPR 2 NPR 2 1 NPR 2 NPRG 3 1 2 1980 1992 12 National Performance Review NPR National Partnership for Reinventing Government NPRG NPR 1 NPR NPR NPR NPR NPR 25 477 2003 2 NPR NPR 1994 NPRG 3 NPR
ｺﾋﾟｰ (7) ～ ＰＤＦ.ren
BSC Balanced Scorecard BSC Robert S. Kaplan David P. Norton Kaplan&Norton BSC BSC BSC BSC (C) BSC BSC Kaplan & Norton BSC Kaplan & Norton,, p.,, p. BSC BSCBSC BSC BSC BSC BSC..,, pp. - BSC BSC BSC BSCKaplan
海保英孝２２３‐２４１／２２３‐２４１
1. (2005, 2006) (Balanced Scorecard, BSC) (Performance Management) BSC Harvard Business Review Kaplan and Norton (1992) Analog Devices Arthur M. Schneiderman 2000; SchneidermanKaplan and Norton (2000)
本文／ＹＡＺ１７２Ｐ
2004 2005 2006 2007 Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of Treadway Commission COSO 1992 Internal Control-Integrated Framework COSO 1 1 COSO 2009 7 27 2009 9 11 21 1956 1980 1986 MBA 1980 2006 1990 1993
自治体への戦略マネジメントモデルの適用 SWOT分析を中心に
ESRI Discussion Paper Series No.157 by February 2006 Economic and Social Research Institute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan 1 E-mail:ohsumi@kanto-gakuin.ac.jp -2 - Application of strategic management model
;; ; ;; ;;; ; ;; ;; ;; ; ;; ; ;; ; ;;;; ;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;;; ;;;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;;; Harvard
管理会計によるインタンジブルズ管理のアプローチ
The purpose of this paper is to describe the expected role of management accounting in the research of intangibles specialized in corporate reputation and reputation management. The reason for this study
16 4 1
16 4 1 1087,1088 7 64 1 67 66 1 3 127129 2001 2 129 1 70 71 41 83 1215 1689 1789 14 3 63 1301 2 7 83 88 8 91 89 20 84 85 86 90 7 86 85 233 82 2000 3 4 5 1346 3 209 83 83 84 84 83 84 83 4 1192 193 2001
仏大 総合研究所・紀要２１号☆／１．大藪
PFI Private Finance InitiativeNPM New Public Management NPM NPM New Public Management PPP Public Private Partnership NPM OECD Citizen s Charter ICT performance PPP Public Private Partnership NPM New Public
64-5 増山裕一.pwd
DHC GHQ Single Married Filing Jointly Married Filing, Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Revenue Act of 1913 United States General Accounting Office 1979, p. 1. Revenue Act of
⑥香取 徹.indd
85 我が国における企業の社会的責任と管理会計 Corporate Social Responsibility and Management Accounting in Japan Toru Katori CSR 1 はじめに Corporate Social Responsibility: CSR 1994 2005 2004 20042 3 4 2 企業の社会的責任 2.1 企業の目的 86 Popper
(1) (2) (3) 1 2 3 SOHO(Small Office Home Office) 4 PR 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 IT SOHO 12 NASA 13 14 15 16 1600 17 18 19 20 21 K- 22 23 24 25 SOHO 26 27 28 29 CDC(Community Development Corporation) NPO NGO 30 31
行動経済学の金融教育への応用の重要性
* 2 2 2010 3 3 2011 4 Princeton University, FINRA Investor Education Foundation2007 5 4 6 ASIC2011a disengagement less-than-optimal choices 7 5 8 2011 9 2011 6 10 OECD2005 11 12 2010 7 13 20112010 14 Benartzi20102011
1 マネジメント コントロール システムと KPI の機能 森口毅彦 キーワード KPI CSF BSC 1. はじめに Kaplan Robert S. Kaplan Norton David P. Norton BSC Balanced Scorecard KPI Key Performance
マネジメント コントロール システムと KPI の機能 森口毅彦. 1 マネジメント コントロール システムと KPI の機能 森口毅彦 キーワード KPI CSF BSC 1. はじめに Kaplan Robert S. Kaplan Norton David P. Norton BSC Balanced Scorecard KPI Key Performance Indicators BSC BSC
untitled
2 3-2-1 RIA 2 RIA 1 RIA 2 2 1 3-2-2 RIA OMB CAO 3-2-3 OMB OIRA Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs RIA 12866 RIA OIRA's review of a draft regulation OMB 12866 Return Letters OMB Prompt Letters
034-047_PS1_hattori.indd
F e a t u r e GLOCOMCAC- 2 a 1 b 2008 5 19 Roger L. Martin and Sally Osberg [2007], Social Entrepreneurship; the case for definition, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 2007 Spring. i n t e l p l a c e
墓地報告書togo.PDF
23 65 27.8%(3,456 ) 2020 150 16 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 1 1 1 1 2 2 4 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 3 5 0 6 2 3 16 68 69 70 71 72
. 1. 26 13 21 27 31 11 35 10. 26 29 146. 26 . 24 11 285 34. 29 31 1 26 12 12 24 12 27 31 31 4 26 30 26 30 26 12 27 26 80 29 31 1 26 30 NPO 26 10 27 23 27 26 26 1 26 1 27 3 31 26 5 31 26 6 1 26 4 1 26 1
2
1 2 1 3 1 3 1 2 3 1 1 ( ) 245 2 ( ) 2 3 2 ( ) NPO 4 0.1 2 ( ) 8 (1) 5 6 3 4 2 1 2 3 5 7 8 (1) 8 90 8 30 3 9 8 90 9 2 9 2 9 3 10 (1) (3) 20 11 12 ha ha 13 ha ha 14 15 ha ha ha ha ha ha 16 17 18 19 20 21
untitled
pr. 2006 No. 010 CONTENTS s s s s s s Business Plan 1 2 Forum 3 4 Forum 5 Patent consultation case 6 Forum 7 8 For production public study 9 10 Equipment 11 12 Collabo 13 Facility 14 Service Scheme 15
Q A Q A 1
IHI Report Q A Q A 1 Q A Q A To Our Shareholders 2 706 803 42 9 1,030 790 66 17 1,894 1,716 55 103 3 Business Review by Segment 1,350 57 45 1,310 704 34 16 755 103 31 16 41 763 16 10 554 4 Performance
<98418C8B2D8C6F8DCF8C6F8963985F8F572E696E6462>
23 2 2016 3 5 The Balance Strategy of Manufacturing Competitiveness and Market-Making Competitiveness of Japan's small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises during a recession From the perspective
環境マネジメントシステムが抱える課題と対応策――ISO14001の取り組み現場から
SJRM S J R M R i s k R e v i e w 9 ISO 14001 Issues and Actions on Environmental Management Systems (EMS): From the Consulting Field of the ISO 14001 Environmental Management System: EMS 1 EMS ISO 14001
修士論文 doc
15 12 - 1 - - 2 - - 3 - - 4 - - 5 - - 6 - 10 11-7 - - 8 - 8-9 - - 10 - (1) - 12 - (2) 1995 15 16-13 - 1997 17 9 1997 18-14 - (3) - 15 - (4) - 16 - 19 29-17 - (5) - 18 - - 19 - - 20 - (1) - 21 - (2)
中国市場における日系・欧米系企業の戦略比較
No.24 2002 7 Abstract In this paper, I review the trade conflict between Japan and China, which happened in 2001. The import 3 list of articles (car, portable telephone, air conditioner) from Japan to
untitled
2 3-22 23-24 25-1 - - 2 - 2-3 - 1848 1901 1936 3 1960 2005 10 27.8 1-4 - 2 5 A 3000 4-5 - 4 20 120 160 70 10-6 - 12 40 6070 80 20 20 7 5 9 15 130 I U 8 4 2 3-7 - 4 1,600 500 200 48 100 80-8 - - 9 - 1 12
PFI（Private Finance Initiative）の有効性に関する一考察
PFI Private Finance Initiative PFI PFI PFI PFI PFI PFI Public Private Partnerships PPPs PFI PFIPFI PFI PPPs PFI PPPs PFI PSC Public Sector Comparator VFM Value for Money PFI Mar. PFI PFI PFI PFI PFI,,
IP Management Within Universities: Experiences in the US
yuko.harayama@most.tohoku.ac.jp 17/3/2004 1 Ref. Sandelin TLO expertise Ref. AUTM 17/3/2004 2 Ref. Heller & Eisenberg, 1998 The scientific commons is becoming privatized! (Ref. Nelson, 2003) 17/3/2004
5 10 10-1 - 5 20-2 - - 3 - - 4 - 22 6 30 10 12 22 7 8 1 30 4 30 1 22 7 14 10 12 20 22 7 21 1 30 3 30-5 - - 6 - - 7 - 11 9 9 14 10 9 15 7 9 10 NPO - 8 - - 15 - - 16 - - 17 - - 19 - - 20 - - 21 - - 22
奄美地域の自然資源の保全・活用に関する基本的な考え方(案)
1 15 5 15 16 19 20 2 3 10 25,000 30,000 6 8 710 11 16 4 1213 1415 17 17 28 17 126,483 30 5 70,462 8,572 27,167 14,551 5,731 29 18 560 10 1,032 1 6 1,300 47 28 4 19 1 8 23 17 100 7 15 8 NPO IT 1979 9 NPO
ブック 1.indb
Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 1 日本の府省における政策評価の実践とアカウンタビリティ 概要 1. はじめに 2001 1 2007 1 2015a 2 2 2010 3 Bovens 2007: 184 2016: 1 2015b: 5 PPBS Planning Programming Budgeting
_−Ö“ª
53 2010 35 48 Sekine Masanori CSR CSR CSR CSR CSR 53 2010 CSR CSR Corporate Social Responsibility CSR Commission of the European Communities 2001 CSR 2004 CSR CSR CSR CSR CSR a CSR European Union A concept
e? e? h? h? h? h? h? h? e??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee?? e??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??
15 6 9 3 18 9 1 17 244 1 15 7-1 - - 2 - ( 244 2 8 ) 17.9.5No35 17 7-3 - 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (1,795) 38.7% (2,844) 61.3% 34.1 (329) 83.4 (131) 65.9 (635) 16.6 (26) 38.2 (1265) 61.8 (2048) (N=4639) 34.1
3.3.. Copyright 007 by Kenji OHTOMO 21 Evaluation? Evaluation Logic Model Performance Measurement Program Evaluation 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 40 50
村本 孜７１‐８９／７１‐８９
MERITUM RICARDIS OECD https://www.jicpa knk.ne.jp/download/image/index.html EU (intellectual capital rating) BCP OECD IR ex.) ex.) ex.) ex.) http://www.meti.go.jp/policy/intellectual_assets/index.htm (intellectual
基本保守／運用方式
http://sirius.itfrontier.co.jp/ 1. Web 2. WebTrends 3. i. ii. iii. iv. URL v. Smart Souce Data Collector WT Script 4. Web i. ii. iii. 5. i. ii. iii. 6. More Information i. Company Profile ii. iii. iv.
サービスマネジメントのメソドロジ
Outsourcing Service Management Methodologies IT IT IT Abstract In today s complicated outsourcing business environment, with its diverse service scope, the quality of service provided by outsourcers may
[http://www.measuredhs.com/aboutsurveys/dhs/ start.cfm] Black, T. R., Namwadda, R., Mugambe, J., Walugembe, E. & Esanu, C. (1999). Education growth in Uganda. International Journal of Educational Development,
untitled
c Society5.0 Society5.0 Society5.0 Society5.0 2017 Society5.0 SDGs SIP PRISM Society5.0 2017 SIP ImPACT PRISM SDGs 1. Society5.0 2016 9 Society5.0 OR [1] Society5.0 2. Society5.0 2.1 Society5.0 Society5.0
米国の連邦政府における内部統制について
OMB A E-mail takeshi.mori@boj.or.jp Sarbanes-Oxley Act SEC internal control over financial reporting legislative branch Article 1, Section 8 OMB Office of Management and Budget GAO Government Accountability
untitled
1 2 20 2005.1 2005.11 2007.12 3 2007.6 4 2006 31.2 6 4.2 9.6 2 3 17 1 29 EU 2 3 1 37 http://www.meti.go.jp/statistics/ tyo/kaigaizi/result/ 2 2004 1 85 15 35 5.25 2008 7 1 Wall Street Journal 2000 3680
金融規制における課徴金制度の抑止効果と法的課題
D&O D&O E-mail: kazutoshi.sugimura@boj.or.jp / /2015.7 143 1. 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 1 2005 13 2 3 6 2 172 2007 31 2 34 21 2 4 2005 40 172 2 1 1 25 3 28 24 301 5 175 1 2 6 2005 13 144 /2015.7 7 8 fairness retribution
研究レポート表紙.PDF
No.118 November 2001 ISO ISO takeishi@fri.fujitsu.co.jp ISO14001 CEAR A4823 1. ISO14000 ISO14000 ISO14001 2. ISO ISO. ISO14001 ISO9000 OHSAS18001 18002 ISO14001 ISO IEC13335 ISO10006. ISO ISO14001 ISO9000
Microsoft Word - 荳ｭ蟲ｶ諱ｵ
11 1 Porter Barney Barney Barney 2013 4 1 2004 1995 TDL 2 1998 2 2010 Porter 1980 Wernerfelt 1984 Barney 1986 Rumelt 1984 isolating mechanism Dierickx and Cool 1989 2010 1990 Praharad and Hamel 1990 Hamel
FD FD
FD FD accountability accountability computare responsabilité responsibility responsabilidad Verantwortlichkeit S O MMT Machine Manageable Test MMT Monkey Manageable Test human potential VS Transforming
平成16年度 教育研究員研究報告書 高等学校 地理歴史・公民
-1- -2- 1 2 3 4 5-3- what what kind where why if how so -4- 19-5- 3 what what where what kind w h y if why why -8- -9- what why so why what so -10- 3 / -11- 1905 etc. etc. Memo what what why why what
1950 1970 1990 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 6,788 7,123 5,384 4,915 4,908 4,927 4,895 4,919 4,936 4,927 4,897 5,010 5,008 1,456 1
1950 1970 1990 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 6,788 7,123 5,384 4,915 4,908 4,927 4,895 4,919 4,936 4,927 4,897 5,010 5,008 1,456 1,616 927 824 826 821 813 808 802 803 801 808 806 18,483
représentation re- représentation représentation 2-1-1 rasen@ipc.ibaraki.ac.jp http//www.infocul.edu.ibaraki.ac.jp/syarin/
PMI2005北米大会報告書
2 3 Metro Toronto Convention Center Toronto, Canada PMI PMI SIG Meeting Paper Presentation PM PM PMI 4 5 8-15 Sep. 2005, Metro Toronto Convention Center, Toronto, Canada 6 7 CEO PM 180,000 PMI BMW PMI
2000 129 1.... 1 2.... 1 2.1 3 (1) Checklist for Proposers (Form I) 3 (2) Cover Page (Form A) 3 (3) Proposal Executive Summary (Form B) 3 (4) Project Signature Page (Form C) 3 (5) Project Description 3
...1 GRC...2 GRC...6 SAP GRC...8 SAP GRC Risk Management... 9 SAP GRC Process Control SAP GRC Access Control iii Insights on governa
Insights on governance, risk and compliance SAP GRC GRC: Governance, Risk, and Compliance ...1 GRC...2 GRC...6 SAP GRC...8 SAP GRC Risk Management... 9 SAP GRC Process Control... 10 SAP GRC Access Control...
Ł\”ƒ1PDFŠp
73 88 Takeshi MIZUGUCHI This article investigates several studies, proposals and practices regarding environmental accounting and environmental information disclosure. Objects of the investigation include
untitled
~ http://www.e-ainet.com takekoshi.s@e-ainet.com Copyright to AINET Inc.,All rights reserved 1 PM Copyright to AINET Inc.,All rights reserved 2 Robert K. GreenleafThe servant as Leader) The servant-leader
untitled
1 1 15 52.3 17 53 17 1 1 1552.3 1 1 46.5H10 53 H17 15 52.3H15 1 69 70 2 2 2 11 16.3 2 15 2 15 1 2 2.7 16 3.4%H15 2 2 2,000 2 H14 4 H19 16 3 H15 2 2 2 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 (%) H10 H11 H12 H13 H14 H15 H16 H17
ＧＤＰギャップと潜在成長率
2003 output gap 80 1 20 90 20 70 2 1 2 output gap potential output 1 2 (2001) 3 potential rate of growth 2000 Meyer (2000) European Central Bank: (1999b) 2002 10 4 3 (2000) 4 4 () 5 5 5 6 () () 7 Total
Abstract Objectives: This article presents a review of cancer control measures implemented in Phase One of the National Cancer Control Plan (
2012Vol.61No.6p.524542 The Japanese National Cancer Control Plan: A Review of Phase One and lessons learned for Phase Two Ken-ichi HANIOKA Cancer Policy Information Center, Health and Global Policy Institute
2 1 図 2 連邦政府と地方との役割分担 ( 出典 :FEMA) 2 2. 米国の危機管理システムの変遷 1950 Disaster Relief Act Civil Defense Act National Flood Insurance Act
特集 : 大規模災害と社会保障 Ⅱ 災害発生時における危機対応システム - 米国の事例に学ぶ - 牧紀男 要約本稿は 被害軽減 (preparedness) を中心とした危機対応から 被害抑止 (mitigation) 災害復興 (recovery) までも含めた総合的な防災対策を構築していっている米国の事例から 東日本大震災の教訓を踏まえた新たな日本の危機管理対策のあり方について考えるものである
maiji2007_cover_j_0907
27 CORPORATE PHILOSOPHY THE MEIJI DAIRIES GROUP CONTRIBUTES TO A HEALTHY AND HAPPY DAILY LIFE FOR OUR CUSTOMERS BY OFFERING NEW LEVELS OF VALUE IN FOOD. CONTENTS 2 4 6 1 1 11 12 13 14 16 18 19 2 22 23
Journal of the Faculty of Management and Information Systems, Prefectural University of Hiroshima 2016 No.9 pp Fixed budgetary target and mot
Journal of the Faculty of Management and Information Systems, Prefectural University of Hiroshima 2016 No.9 pp.75 88 75 Fixed budgetary target and motivating managers under high uncertainty Hiroshi ADACHI
untitled
ISO90012008...1 0.1...2 0.2...3 1....3 1.1...4 1.2...4 2....4 3....5 4...6 4.1...6 4.2...7 5...9 5.1...9 5.2...9 5.3...9 5.4...9 5.5 11 5.6...12 6... 13 6.1... 13 6.2... 13 6.3... 14 6.4... 15 7... 16
1 (1996), p. 7 (2006), p (2003), p. 2 p (2003), p. 21 (2008), p. 3 (2003), p. 17 B (2003), p. 28 A, A (2004), p. 17 J, A (2004), p. 9 (p.
ISSN 1347-4448 ISSN 1348-5504 8 12 (2009 12 ) E-mail: h-amikur@sophia.ac.jp I. 1 2009 Global Business Research Center www.gbrc.jp 701 1 (1996), p. 7 (2006), p. 14 3 (2003), p. 2 p. 11 3 (2003), p. 21 (2008),
Research on Academic Degrees and University Evaluation The Chronicle of Higher Education Chronicle Analytical Perspectives Research Centers Directory Research Centers Directory Administrative Policies
140 NDPG Defense of Japan 2010, pp. 2-3.
9 9/11 1 NDPG 10 NDPG 1976 1995 2004 2004 NDPG 2 NDPG 2010 12 2009 8 3 2011 3 11 1 Yasuaki Chijiwa, Japan s Security Outlook: Its Implications for the Defense Policy, in Asia Pacific Countries Security
BSC 4 BSC 2006 BSC BSC BSC BSC SWOT BSC BSC
19 20 1 BSC 4 BSC 2006 BSC BSC BSC BSC SWOT BSC BSC 20 1 7 19 1 ...1...5 BSC...7 BSC... 13... 15... 18 3 A... 23... 24 BSC... 24 BSC... 25... 25... 32 B... 33... 34 BSC... 34... 34... 39 C... 40... 41...
技術創造の社会的条件
1999 10 21 21 i ... 1 1... 3 1-1. 20...3 1900 1945 3 1945 198x 4 198x 1999 5 1-2....7 1945 198x 7 HEMT 8 198x 1999 9 9 1-3....11 11 12 13 18 2 New Institutions... 21 2-1....21 22 24 26 2-2....27 28 29
株式会社幸楽苑
35th Business Report http://www.kourakuen.co.jp/ To Our Shareholders Management Report CONTENTS 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 11 14 15 16 17 1 2 Management Strategy 3 4 5 6 Management Strategy Commentary Information 7
6) 7) MBO management buy-out 2 necessity sufficiency ) 21
1) 1997 15 02 03 751 1998 8 9 04 1996 16.1% 17.5% 26.9% 64.9% 63.3% 48.9% 2) 02 54.8% 59.0% 61.8% 78.6% 46.5% 1996 17.8% 19.9% 18.7% 42% 11.9% 3) 4) 01 3 1 3 2 03 04 1 TCL 5) Vol. 52, No. 4, October 06
大扉～目次校正２版.PDF
13 12 25 New Public Management New Public Management 20 15 1 New Public Management NPM NPM 20 NPM 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 4 5 7 7 8 9 11 11 11 12 13 14 15 19 20 20 24 25 27 29 31 31 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 45 New
1 基本的考え方
... 1 1.1. BCP(Business Continuity Plan) 1 1.2. BCP 2 1.3. BCP 6 1.4. 9... 10 2.1. BCP 10 2.2. 11 2.3. 12 2.4. BCP 14 2.5. BCP 15 BCP... 17 3.1. 17 3.3. BCP 19 3.4. 22 3.5. 24 3.6. 25 3.7. 26... 28 4.1.
CSIS 4 the Asia-Pacific, or the Indo-Pacific region Asia s Democratic Security Diamond 7 11 sea-faring democracies Lake Beijing
1 nifty 2010 2012 3 4 2011 6 20 9 24 1 2 2. 2013 1 3 5 3 2-25- 1 2 23 CSIS 4 the Asia-Pacific, or the Indo-Pacific region 5 2 28 6 12 27 Asia s Democratic Security Diamond 7 11 sea-faring democracies Lake
PDF.....p
5 NGO 2006 2010 ODA JICA JBIC AusAid 118 5 VAMSEPII 2004 2007 VAMSEPII 1 NPO 2 3 4 1 NGO 119 1980 ODA 1 ALNAP 1 FASID http://www.fasid. or.jp/chosa/oda/kenkyukai.html 120 5 Active Learning Network for
新製品開発プロジェクトの評価手法
CIRJE-J-60 2001 8 A note on new product project selection model: Empirical analysis in chemical industry Kenichi KuwashimaUniversity of Tokyo Junichi TomitaUniversity of Tokyo August, 2001 Abstract By
(2) (The Con ference of the PartiesCOP3) (CO2)(CH4)(N2O) (HFC)(PFC)(SF6) EU 8 ( 6 ((JI) ) 12 ((CDM) ) 17 )
14 19 1 (IPCC) 1861 0.6±0.2 20 10cm 20cm 50 21 1.4 5.8 21 9cm 88cm 2 (1) () 1992 5 6 1993 5 1994 3 1990 1990 1990 1 (2) 2002 1997 12 3 (The Con ference of the PartiesCOP3) (CO2)(CH4)(N2O) (HFC)(PFC)(SF6)
商学 ６４‐５☆／２１．太田原
694 TQC TQC 1 2 3 1TQC 2 3SQC TQC 4 Shimokawa1992 TPS Nelson and Winter, pp.3 22 1978 1985 TPS 1992 TQC 695 Total Quality Control TQC TPS TQC 2003 TQC 2012TQC 1988 TQC 1 TQC TQC 2 50 1950 70 TQC 2 TQC