...,..,..%,
|
|
- まいか いさやま
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 < JEL ClassificationD, H, K.....
2 ...,..,..%,
3 < IRS, (Adjusted gross income),. USD=. Yankelovich, Skelly,&White, Inc., Internal Revenue Serv., Taxpayer Attitudes StudyFinal Report () IRS Individual Income Tax Rates and SharesCongressional Budget Office Historical effective federal tax rates
4 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 97.64% 87.11% 88.26% 70.62% 67.55% 59.07% 45.17% 37.38% 33.78% 18.87% 11.74% 2.36% Top 1% Top 5% Top 10% Top 25% Top 50% Bm 50% Top % Top % Top % Top % Top % Adrian Dungan and Michael ParisiIndividual Income Tax Rates and Shares,. Table (IRS),
5 < 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 27.79% 5.53% 52.13% 17.66% 58.88% 22.89% 79.56% 51.20% 87.23% 66.54% 33.46% 12.77% Top 0.97% Top 5.5% Top 8.03% Top 26.75% Top 40.78% Bm 59.22% Top.% Top.% Top.% Top.% Top.%, 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 28.12% 14.50% 68.02% 38.46% 75.03% 44.57% 92.90% 69.76% 97.07% 83.28% 16.72% 2.93% Top 0.7% Top 6.3% Top 8.8% Top 27.6% Top 47.1% Bm 52.9% Top.% Top.% Top.% Top.% Top.%
6 ,. /.,,.% /. (.%). CBO % Congressional Budget Office Trends in the Distribution of Household Income Between and
7 < Congressional Budget Office Trends in the Distribution of Household Income Between and.%.% TOP TOP...% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
8 IRS. IRS.%.% TOP TOP...%, Congressional Budget Office Trends in the Distribution of Household Income Between and () IRSThe Individual Income Tax Returns Reporting the Largest Adjusted Gross Income
9 <.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.% -.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.% %.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%..%.%.%.%.%.%.%..%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.% 35% 30% % 32.53% 25% 20% 15% 10% 24.28% % % 11.84% % 17.48% % 11.56% % 0% % 2.15% % 0.15%
10 ,,..%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.% % % % % % % % % % % % %.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%. CBOHistorical Federal Tax Rates: to (Dec )
11 < 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%..%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.% % % % % % %.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.% % % % % % %
12 .%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%..%.%.%.%.%.%..%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
13 < 35% 30% 25% 20% 2006(H18) 2011(H23) 15% 10% 5% 0%
14 70,000 60,000 62,884 68,143 70,531 61,222 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 49,025 50, ( ,
15 <.. TOP.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%
16 .%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.% TOP,,,,,.%.%.% -, -, - - -, -,,,.%.%.%,,,,,.%.%.%,,,, TOP,,,,,.%.%.% -, -, -, - -, -,,,.%.%.%,,,,,.%.%.%,,,,,
17 <,,,, TOP TOP TOP Adjusted Gross Income TOP,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Section of the Tax Reform Act of. Stat. at ) IRSThe Individual Income Tax Returns Reporting the Highest Adjusted Gross Income Each Year - TOP..
18 ,.%,.%,.%,.%,.%,.%,.%,.%,,,.%,,,.%,,,.%,,,.%,,,.%,,,.%,,,.% Adjusted Gross Income TOP TOP,,,,,,,, ForbesThe Billionaires List() CBO (all capital income).% Isaac Shapiro and Joel Friedman New Unnoticed CBO data show capital income has become much more concentrated at the top(jan ) Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
19 <, - -, - -,,,,,, - -,, -, -,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, -, - PS,,,,,, Capital gains subject to preferential rates,,, FX,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Contributions deduction TOP effective average tax rates) total income tax)
20 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% TOP TOP
21 < -, - -,,,,,, (,, -,,,, (,, (,,,,,,,,,,, TOP
22 A.,.,,.,,.
23 < H.. H..
24 .% () 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% % 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%
25 < 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% % 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% 30.0% 25.0% % 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0%
26 H H H H H H.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.% (H) (H) (H) (H) (H) -.% -.% -.%.% -.% -.% -.% -.% -.%.% -.%.% -.% -.% -.% -.%.% -.%.% -.% -.% -.% -.% -.%.%.%.% -.% -.% -.% -.%.%.% -.% -.% -.% -.% -.%.%.% -.% -.% -.% -.% -.%.%.%.% -.% -.% -.% -.%.%.%.% -.% -.% -.% -.%.%.%.% -.% -.%.% -.% -.%.%.% -.% -.%.% -.%.%.%.% -.% -.%.% -.%.%.%.% -.% -.%.% -.% -.%.%.%.% -.%.%.% -.%.%.%.%.%.%.% -.%.%.%.%.%.%.% -.%.%.%.%.%.%.% -.%.%.%.%.%.%.% -.% -.%.%.%.%.%.% -.% -.%.%.%.%.%.% -.% -.%.%.%.%.%.% -.% -.%.%.%.%.%.% -.%.%.%.%
27 < TOP TOP TOP TOP TOP TOP -
28 Married filing jointly) year or more)
29 < 財務省財務総合政策研究所 フィナンシャル レビュー 平成 26 年第 2 号 ( 通巻第 118 号 )2014 年 3 月発行 > 表 18 わが国の金融 資本所得の税制の概要平成 26 年 (2014) 以降 % NA.% - 参考文献 金子宏 (18 版 ) 租税法 弘文堂中里実 課税管轄権からの離脱をはかる行為について フィナンシャル レビュー 94 号, 2009 年 5 月 p.4 増井良啓 税務執行の理論 フィナンシャル レビュー 65 号,2002 年 10 月 p.169 森信茂樹 二元的所得税とわが国への政策的インプリケーション フィナンシャル レビ
30 p. p. Adrian Dungan and Michael Parisi, Individual Income Tax Rates and Shares, Statistics of Inome Bulletin, Winter, pp.- SOI Tax Stats - Individual High Income Tax Returns High-Income-Tax-Returns The Congressional Budget Office Trends in the Distribution of Household Income Between and pdf The Congressional Budget Office Historical Effective Federal Tax Rates: to ftpdocs/xx/doc/--historicaltaxrates. pdf The IRS The Individual Income Tax Returns Reporting the Largest Adjusted Gross Incomes Each Year, - irs-soi/intop.pdf The President s Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform Simple, Fair,and Pro-Growth:Proposals to Fix America s Tax Nov.
64-5 増山裕一.pwd
DHC GHQ Single Married Filing Jointly Married Filing, Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Revenue Act of 1913 United States General Accounting Office 1979, p. 1. Revenue Act of
More informationWinter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003
266 Vol. 44 No. 3 I 序論 Mirrlees 1971 Diamond 1998 Saez 2002 Kaplow 2008 1 700 900 1, 300 1, 700 II III IV V II わが国の再分配の状況と国際比較 OECD Forster and Mira d Ercole 2005 2006 2001 Winter 08 267 図 1 図 2 2000 2
More information野村資本市場研究所|「財政の崖」回避をめぐる議論と米国地方債市場(PDF)
1. 1 2011 28% 2. 2012 12 3. 2013 1 2 4. 1 1 2013 1 2 2 1 2 Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, Regulatory Fiscal cliff negotiation could affect the taxexemption, December 10 2012. Bloomberg,
More information() OECD SNA SNA SNA
< %. % OECD JEL Classification E, H % % () OECD SNA SNA SNA < 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 38.9 35.2 36.0 35.8 33.7 35.0 33.1 34.0 32.5 32.2 35.3 31.2 31.2 30.8 29.1 29.0 31.5 32.0 28.9 32.0 30.1 31.3 27.7 27.0
More informationuntitled
1 2 20 2005.1 2005.11 2007.12 3 2007.6 4 2006 31.2 6 4.2 9.6 2 3 17 1 29 EU 2 3 1 37 http://www.meti.go.jp/statistics/ tyo/kaigaizi/result/ 2 2004 1 85 15 35 5.25 2008 7 1 Wall Street Journal 2000 3680
More information税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析
Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title Author(s) 税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析 Uemura, Toshiyuki, 上村, 敏之 ; Kitamura Takayuki, 金田, 陸幸 Citation 経済学論究, 69(4): 1-16 Issue Date 2016-3-20 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10236/14671
More informationIncome tax (net of income tax credits) a National Insurance contributions) Capital taxes Capital gains tax Inherit
1 VAT Value Added Tax: 17.5% 2000-01 375.6 Income tax 25.5% VAT 15.9% National Insurance contributions) 15.7% VAT Corporation tax 9.0% Petrol duties 6.2% 70% -1- 2000-01 Income tax (net of income tax credits)
More informationFederal Emergency Management Agency FEMA FEMA FEMA Disaster Relief Act of 1950 p. 53 pp. 109 110
Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA FEMA FEMA Disaster Relief Act of 1950 p. 53 pp. 109 110 Presidential Declaration FEMA Robert Theodore Stafford Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency
More informationNo.9 3 4 4 5 6 9 9 13 15 15 17 21 23 27 31 2 1990 95 3 1 1 65 1 50 50 1 (2000) 4 1989 2 20% 26% 90 1 2 89 12 5 95 3 94 96 98 99 5 4 50 4 1 3 5 700 1,200 40 1,000 2 87 70% 15 60% 12 89 50% 5 3 95 1 4 90
More informationGDP tax expenditure GDP GDP GDP TANF GDP
特集 : アメリカの社会保障 21 世紀のアメリカ社会保障 渋谷博史 中浜隆 櫻井潤 1 2 3 1 2 1960 1980 1963 1980 Reaganomics 1960 1990 2000 1 21 1960 1980 4 21 1950 1 2 1 2 3 2 1 2 3 3 2 2-1 1 2006 1 GDP 8.9 2 tax expenditure GDP 0.7 0.8 4 3
More information2-栗原.TXT
NAOSITE: Nagasaki University's Ac Title カジノ税に関する一考察 Author(s) 栗原, 克文 Citation 經營と經濟, vol.89(1), pp.17-34; 2009 Issue Date 2009-06 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10069/23392 Right This document is downloaded
More information所得の水準とばらつきの時系列的推移について-JGSSと政府統計の比較-
Trends of Income Level and Distribution: Comparison of the results of Data and Government Statistics Takehisa SHINOZAKI School of Creative Science and Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda
More informationアメリカのNPO税制
N P O NPO 501 NPO NPO NPO NPO NPO 17 20 NPO NPO NPO NPO NPO NPO 501 NPO Non-profit Organization 26 U.S.C.501 30 2004. NPO 501 199357 5,6902003964,418 10 59.7 50164.2 2003 501 501 35 130 NPO 25 NPO 1,250
More informationIshi
Ishi HPhttp: // www.mof.go.jp / jouhou / syuzei / siryou /.htm.. or ERTA, TRA ERTA Economic Recovery Tax Act TRA Tax Reform Act Mroz Triest Lindsey Burtless Navrati Lindsey Burtless Navrati CPS Current
More informationValue Added Tax VAT Mirrlees, J. VAT The Mirrlees Review The Structure and Reform of Direct Taxation Report of a Committee chaired by Professor J. E. Meade Dimensions of Tax Design Mirrlees 2010 Tax by
More information,
JOC , , HP http://www.nta.go.jp pp. 426455 NPO pp. 766810 , Internal Revenue Service 2012 Publication 547, Casualties, Disasters, and Thefts 2012 Returns, pp. www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p.pdf2013. 3. 20
More informationThe effect of tax rate and deduction in income taxation In Japan, numerous attempts have been made to reform the income taxation system. Researchers h
The effect of tax rate and deduction in income taxation In Japan, numerous attempts have been made to reform the income taxation system. Researchers have pointed out that as a result of these attempts,
More information,.,,.,. NIRA,.,.,,, GDP.,., 1%, 2.0% 3).,,.,,., 1, 4).,,.,, GDP,.,,.,,,.,,., 2002.,,., 3), Q&A Q16 (http://www.stat.go.jp/data/kakei/qa-1.ht
1, 1, 2011 4 3-28,,.,,.,.,,.,,.,,.,.,. 1., 1), 1946.,, GDP,.,,,.,,., (2008) ( NIRA ), 23,.,,, 2).,,,.,,.,,., 657-8501 2-1, E-mail: unayama@person.kobe-u.ac.jp 1) 1. 2), 1990 2 21, 1993 6 12. 3 1 1 2011
More information我が国税制の現状と課題
1 (%) 60 30 ( ) 100 200 PHP 2 3 4 5 6 7 55.9 % 48.3 % 65.3 % 28.6 % 36.9 % 14.3 % 22.6 % 35.8 % 9.7% 26.1 % 10.1 % 38.2 % 26.7 % 29.2 % 36.7 % (2001 ) (1997) (1996) (1997) (1997) 17.8 12.6 15.8 15.2 15.2
More information1. 2. (Rowthorn, 2014) / 39 1
,, 43 ( ) 2015 7 18 ( ) E-mail: sasaki@econ.kyoto-u.ac.jp 1 / 39 1. 2. (Rowthorn, 2014) 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 2 / 39 1 ( 1). ( 2). = +. 1. g. r. r > g ( 3).. 3 / 39 2 50% Figure I.1. Income inequality in the
More information1
1 3 5 5 5 DC 9 NISA 20 22 26 26 IRA Roth IRA SEP SIMPLE 27 401(k) 33 529 38 ESOP 40 42 42 ISA 43 49 NEST 52 54 56 56 56 58 58 59 60 61 61 NISA DC 62 NISA 62 DC 63 DC 64 67 67 67 68 69 69 70 70 71 72 NISA
More information所得税の税収構造の要因分解による実証分析 : 所得控除の税収ロスと税率変更による増収額の試算
Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title Author(s) 所 得 税 の 税 収 構 造 の 要 因 分 解 による 実 証 分 析 : 所 得 控 除 の 税 収 ロス と 税 率 変 更 による 増 収 額 の 試 算 Uemura, Toshiyuki, 上 村, 敏 之 Citation 経 済 学 論 究, 66(2): 119-135 Issue Date
More informationuntitled
L A - 5 8 SBIC 2005 12 ERISA Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 L Leverage SBA LR Leverage Ratio SBA ME Management Expense PC Private Capital PD Participating Debenture PPA Prioritized Payment
More informatione? e? h? h? h? h? h? h? e??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee?? e??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??
More informationThe Effects of Tax Revenue by Deductions of National Income Tax and Individual Inhabitants Tax The national income tax and individual inhabitants tax
The Effects of Tax Revenue by Deductions of National Income Tax and Individual Inhabitants Tax The national income tax and individual inhabitants tax have similar deduction systems, but their respective
More informationuntitled
1 2 20056 24365 3 4 10 5 11 20056 12 6 61.7 486 102.3 613 13 : : 14 7 15 : : 16 8 17 18 9 : 6 19 20066 20 10 (: 21 (: (: (: 22 11 (: (: 23 20066 24 12 25 idc(internet Data Center)MDC(Media Distribution
More information三税協力の実質化 : 住民税の所得税閲覧に関する国税連携の効果
Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title 三 税 協 力 の 実 質 化 : 住 民 税 の 所 得 税 閲 覧 に 関 する 国 税 連 携 の 効 果 Author(s) Suzuki, Ushio, 鈴 木, 潮 Citation 経 済 学 論 究, 65(4): 175-197 Issue Date 2012-03-20 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10236/9133
More information44 2012 2013 3 35 48 法人化後の国立大学の収入変動 37 法人化後の国立大学の収入変動 2009 2005 2010 2012 2012 2008 2009a 2010 16 18 17 20 2 4 2012 38 44 2012 17 22 (1) (2) 2012 5 GP COE 30 WPI 1 2012 17 22 16 17 22 17 17 19 2012 2012
More informationズームインNo.22(要約版・0608)
21 5 500 600 08 2030 10 40 35 50 21 21 25 5 21 500 600 10 0 08 10 1 2008 79 3.6 06 13 5.4 3 2 08 79 04 8 06 08 08 2030 10 40 50 3 1 .jp 08 835 Pro 35 5 35 35 08 10 35S 1 5 0.3 09 1 35 1 08 11 08 12 50
More informationaccount4-1.PDF
12 8 23 13 1 1 2 4 13 TEL 1 13 1 12 2 1 12 4 30 13 1 1 2 13 1 1 Office 13 1 1 13 1 1 1 12 2 1 12 4 30 99 3 office 3.1 4 office 426 147 85 3 6 12 2 1 13 1 31 office 5 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 12 2 1 12 4 30 11 8 1
More informationuntitled
2010 Winter 2 No. PRACTICE 2010 Winter No. 2 PRACTICE 4 8 14 10 16 12 18 26 30 34 38 39 40 42 44 46 49 51 56 54 60 64 66 67 68 4 PRACTICE 5 PRACTICE 6 7 PRACTICE 8 PRACTICE 9 PRACTICE 10 PRACTICE 11 PRACTICE
More informationTaro-修士論文.PDF
04M3070 1953 28 1957 32 1958 33 1988 63 1989 2002 14 2003 15-1- 2001-2- 50-3- 2001 2000 12 2,693 1995 2,557 2004 1.29 WHO 2.08 1970 1) 14 2006 18 2,774 2000 10 50 59 60 10 10 19 2) 1987 62 1988 63 1 15
More informationFX ) 2
(FX) 1 1 2009 12 12 13 2009 1 FX ) 2 1 (FX) 2 1 2 1 2 3 2010 8 FX 1998 1 FX FX 4 1 1 (FX) () () 1998 4 1 100 120 1 100 120 120 100 20 FX 100 100 100 1 100 100 100 1 100 1 100 100 1 100 101 101 100 100
More information15 CFC foreign business income mobile income 3 [ ] CFC the passive Conduct of an active business highly mobile FPHCI PRESIDENT S ADVISORY PANEL
15 Active income PassiveMobileincome /CFC Active income PassiveMobileincome Active Passive Passive income Zoltab Gerendy passive income passive income passive income 1 Active income PassiveMobileincome
More information-March Internal Revenue Service IRS Controlled Foreign Corporation, CFC Foreign Sales Corporation, FSC Interest Charge-Domestic International Sales Co
US CFC CFC CFC U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis,, WTO -March Internal Revenue Service IRS Controlled Foreign Corporation, CFC Foreign Sales Corporation, FSC Interest Charge-Domestic
More informationKyoto Sangyo University. NII-Electronic Library Service
. No. FX No. IRCInternal Revenue Code a IRC a IRC gross income IRC a IRC,,,,, ,, IRC a personal physical injuriesphysical sickness punitive damages the Income Tax Act of b personal injuries or sickness
More informationⅡ アメリカ合衆国の災害対策の歴史と組織 1 National Ocean Atmospheric Administration NOAA The National Climate Center NCDC PL89-3
Autumn 2014 No. 188 特集 : 大規模災害と社会保障 Ⅱ 災害カタストロフィにおける個人の 福祉 と 公共性 アメリカ合衆国の連邦災害政策を素材として 後藤玲子 要約本稿は アメリカ合衆国の災害政策 ( とりわけハリケーン カトリーナ ) を題材として 災害カタストロフィにおける個人の 福祉 と 公共性 の関係を考察した 災害も公的機関や社会構造を崩壊させ その向こうに横たわるより広い眺めを見えるに任せることがある
More informationuntitled
Bloomberg ARES Price Book-value Ratio J BA A * 201226 20 2241214 1 J 25 90 90 () 15 10090 10090 () 147 A A B B A A B B A A B ToSTNet 2 2-3 2 4-6 191 9 192 11 1 p16 H20.12 H20.11 H20.10 H20.3 H19.11
More information1 48
Section 2 1 48 Section 2 49 50 1 51 Section 2 1 52 Section 2 1 53 1 2 54 Section 2 3 55 1 4 56 Section 2 5 57 58 2 59 Section 2 60 2 61 Section 2 62 2 63 Section 2 3 64 Section 2 6.72 9.01 5.14 7.41 5.93
More informationSection 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 1 Section 3 Section 2 4 5 Section 1 6 7 Section 1 8 9 10 Section 1 11 12 Section 2 13 Section 2 14 Section 2 15 Section 2 16 Section 2 Section 2 17 18 Section
More information橡25渡辺航.PDF
1 NPR 1 NPR 2 NPR 2 1 NPR 2 NPRG 3 1 2 1980 1992 12 National Performance Review NPR National Partnership for Reinventing Government NPRG NPR 1 NPR NPR NPR NPR NPR 25 477 2003 2 NPR NPR 1994 NPRG 3 NPR
More informationAutumn EU 22 CD P RR 9 7 EU EU 2003 OECD 8 EU OECD OECD EC Included in Society 2003 EC OECD EU
138 Vol. 44 No. 2 はじめに 20 2008 5 2007 9 EU I 障害者政策の国際比較研究 1981 80 90 1990 ADA 1 1999 OAS 2 1996 CD P RR 3 EC 2003 2004 2010 1993 10 ESCAP 4 10 2003 BMF 5 BMF 2007 9 2001 2006 12 2008 5 2000 EU EC EU Autumn
More informationSummer 2010 No. 171 II GM the United Auto WorkersUAW UAW 57, ,
特集 : アメリカの社会保障 アメリカの年金システム 吉田健三 2 1 1 I. Palme 1990 Espin-Andersen 1990 2003 18 33 Summer 2010 No. 171 II. 1941 1959 18 1966 25 GM 1980 2006 65 40 the United Auto WorkersUAW 2006 27.81 1 2005 2076 2 2
More information商学 66‐6☆/7.松浦
1139 2008 9 2008 9 FRB : Federal Reserve Board FRB FRB 1140 1 2008 9 1 1999 2013 Bureau of Economic Analysis, Survey of Current Bunisess, International Data http : //www.bea.gov. 2014 8 10 1141 2000 1
More informationno
12 2004.9.3. no.234 2004.9.3. no.234 13 14 2004.9.3. no.234 2004.9.3. no.234 15 16 2004.9.3. no.234 2004.9.3. no.234 17 18 2004.9.3. no.234 19 2004.9.3. no.234 20 2004.9.3. no.234 21 2004.9.3. no.234 22
More information1
1 1. 2 1-1. 2 3 1-2.2 4 2. 5 6 7 2-1 2-2 2-3 2-4 2-5 2-1 2-2 2-3 2-4 2-5 PDF PDF 8 P10 9 2-1. 10 2-1. 11 2-1. ( ( 12 2-1. 24 13 2-1. 3 3 14 2-1. 15 2-2. 16 17 2-2. 3 18 2-2. 19 2712 3 1000 20 2841 21 ...
More informationMicrosoft Word - ランチョンプレゼンテーション詳細.doc
PS1-1-1 PS1-1-2 PS1-1-3 PS1-1-4 PS1-1-5 PS1-1-6 PS1-1-7 PS1-1-8 PS1-1-9 1 25 12:4514:18 25 12:4513:15 B PS1-1-10 PS1-2-1 PS1-2-2 PS1-2-3 PS1-2-4 PS1-2-5 PS1-2-6 25 13:1513:36 B PS1-2-7 PS1-3-1 PS1-3-2
More informationrepocost.PDF
178 2 10 8 39-52 (tax planning) [Scholes and Wolfson,1992] (tax cost saving hypothesis) (accounting choice) (economic consequences) (financial reporting costs) (1) (financial reporting cost hypothesis)
More information% OFHEO Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight ODPM Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's INSEE (2004 ) PCEOECDE
GDP 7 OFHEO 2005 3 272.89 1980 100 12.0 5 55.3 3 2 1 1979 2004 2 6 2000 68 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 90 2.75 2005 3.4 8.0% 1 6.0% 4.0% 30.3 2.0% DC 20 0.0% OFHEOHouse Price Index 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
More informationアメリカ大統領選挙の手続
2004 11 2 2000 1 1 11 (elector) 1 3 18 1 2 a b 35 c 14 1 26 1 4 2001 2 (voting-age population) 2 1000 1 3000 1 4 2 5 2004 1 19 1 27 2 1988 3 Super Tuesday
More informationuntitled
249 1 5 2 (fiscal cliff) 20131 2012 CBO20132.90.5 201350 1200 1171 1000 800 612 600 400 387 200 213 213 186 123 130 142 144 79 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 20125 201310 3 88.18.3
More information平成28年度国民経済計算 年次推計 (支出側系列等)
平成 28 年度国民経済計算年次推計 ( 支出側系列等 ) FY2016 Annual Estimates of GDP Ⅰ. 国内総生産 ( 支出側 ) 及び各需要項目 GDP (Expenditure Approach) and Its Components 1. 速報値と年次推計値の比較 ( 実質成長率 年度 ) Comparison of the Preliminary and the Revised
More information無印良品のスキンケア
2 3 4 5 P.22 P.10 P.18 P.14 P.24 Na 6 7 P.10 P.22 P.14 P.18 P.24 8 9 1701172 1,400 1701189 1,000 1081267 1,600 1701257 2,600 1125923 450 1081250 1,800 1125916 650 1081144 1,800 1081229 1,500 Na 1701240
More information財政改革の国民意識の役割
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 04-J-010 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 04-J-010 2004 3 JEL classification: H30H60Z13 1 E-mail: nakabayashi-mieko@rieti.go.jp 2002 12 1 1. 1961 Public Debt Reduction Fund 2
More informationNo.42 2010.9 30 4 EITC, Earned Income Tax Credit WTC, Working Tax Credit; CTC, Child Tax Credit GSTC, Goods and Services Tax Credit 3 5 2006 a2006 b 2
1 16 2 3 2008 4 4 in work tax credit welfare to work ALMPs 1990 *1965 1988 1994 1988 2003 2007 2007 2009 35 2009 1 20 2 21 1 21 3 No.42 2010.9 30 4 EITC, Earned Income Tax Credit WTC, Working Tax Credit;
More informationVer.1.0.1-1512 1. 03 2. 04 3. 05 05 4. 06 07 5. 08 6. 09 10 11 12 14 7. 19 2 1. Plus / 3 2. 1 4 3. Plus 5 4. FX 6 4. 7 5. 1 200 3 8 6. 38 25 16 9 6. 10 6. 11 6. 38 / 12 6. 13 6. 25 14 6. 0 359 15 6. 3
More informationTomorrow Next th draft version MEW SWET
Research Center for Price Dynamics A Research Project Concerning Prices and Household Behaviors Based on Micro Transaction Data Working Paper Series No.7 Tomorrow Next を用いた金融政策の分析 青野幸平 June 14, 2012 4th
More informationMicrosimulation of Personal Income Tax Reform from Tax Deductions to Tax Credit Takero Doi Abstract: Using data from the Japan Household
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Title 所得税の税額控除新設試案に関するマイクロ シミュレーション : 所得控除から税額控除へ Sub Title Microsimulation of personal income tax reform from tax deductions to tax credit Author 土居, 丈朗 (Doi, Takero)
More information2
2 3 4 5 6 CB CB DB DB CB DB 7 8 9 10 1 11 12 2 13 3 + CB DB + + 2008630 + 4 14 15 5 6 GAM83 7 16 17 (Internal Revenue Service: ) 19999 8 determination letter 18 2001 9 IRS 9 2001 19 20 $70,350 5 WearAway
More informationCommissioner v Lanes Wells Co Germantown Trust Co v Commissioner Lane Wells Lane Wells Germantown Trust Lane Wells Beard v Commissioner Badaracco v Commissioner See
More informationGDPギャップと潜在成長率
2003 output gap 80 1 20 90 20 70 2 1 2 output gap potential output 1 2 (2001) 3 potential rate of growth 2000 Meyer (2000) European Central Bank: (1999b) 2002 10 4 3 (2000) 4 4 () 5 5 5 6 () () 7 Total
More informationPreliminary study of practice teaching by research interview Keiko OZAKI Keyword: practice teaching, university students, half-structural interview, intentions to become a teacher, support The purpose
More information!!! 10 1 110 88 7 9 91 79 81 82 87 6 5 90 83 75 77 12 80 8 11 89 84 76 78 85 86 4 2 32 64 10 44 13 17 94 34 33 107 96 14 105 16 97 99 100 106 103 98 63 at 29, 66 at 58 12 16 17 25 56
More informationMicrosoft Word - 蜀・伐豬ゥ蠕ウ
821 FIN 48 FIN 48 FIN 48 SFAS 109 SFAS 109 SFAS 109 more likely than not 1 Financial Accounting Standards Board, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.109, Accounting for Income Taxes, February
More information産研論集44.indb
論文 オハイオ州における償却資産課税の廃止と学校区財政への影響 前 田高志 1 本稿の目的 19 22 23 2012 2009 2016 8 DC 1 1 121 44 2017.3 2005 2009 2 アメリカにおける地方償却資産課税 3 2 3 Real Property Tax Real Estate Tax Tangible Personal Property Tax TPPT TPPT
More informationNews Letter
No.10 CONTENTS 01 4 02 3 03 5100 04 05 07 09 10 11 Preface The 21st century COE program TOHOKU UNIVERSITY 0 1 Gender at university Gender News Law & LETTER Policy Center 0 2 Academic society The 21st century
More informationCzech companies are getting pessimistic
209 年 在チェコ日本国大使館 チェコ経済動向分析 209 年 * 経済動向 In the Q 209, according to a preliminary estimate, the gross domestic product was 0.5% up, quarter-on-quarter, and 2.5% up, year-on-year. The Czech economy was successful
More information376-08ooi.indd
統計指標からみたハウジングアフォーダビリティの国際的動向 Ⅰ はじめに United States Census BureauForeclosure Rates... Housing Affordability Affordable Housing United States Census Bureau c, p.. Ⅱ ハウジングアフォーダビリティ統計に関する先行研究 Ernst Engel Engel
More information73 p.1 22 16 2004p.152
1987 p.80 72 73 p.1 22 16 2004p.152 281895 1930 1931 12 28 1930 10 27 12 134 74 75 10 27 47.6 1910 1925 10 10 76 10 11 12 139 p.287 p.10 11 pp.3-4 1917 p.284 77 78 10 13 10 p.6 1936 79 15 15 30 80 pp.499-501
More information日経テレコン料金表(2016年4月)
1 2 3 4 8,000 15,000 22,000 29,000 5 6 7 8 36,000 42,000 48,000 54,000 9 10 20 30 60,000 66,000 126,000 166,000 50 100 246,000 396,000 1 25 8,000 7,000 620 2150 6,000 4,000 51100 101200 3,000 1,000 201
More information