,.,,.,. NIRA,.,.,,, GDP.,., 1%, 2.0% 3).,,.,,., 1, 4).,,.,, GDP,.,,.,,,.,,., 2002.,,., 3), Q&A Q16 (
|
|
|
- やすもり おとべ
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1, 1, ,,.,,.,.,,.,,.,,.,.,. 1., 1), 1946.,, GDP,.,,,.,,., (2008) ( NIRA ), 23,.,,, 2).,,,.,,.,,., , unayama@person.kobe-u.ac.jp 1) 1. 2), ,
2 ,.,,.,. NIRA,.,.,,, GDP.,., 1%, 2.0% 3).,,.,,., 1, 4).,,.,, GDP,.,,.,,,.,,., 2002.,,., 3), Q&A Q16 ( 4),, Family Expenditure Survey (FES) 2, Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) 1,. 4
3 :.,, 2%.,.,,,., 2.,,.,,,.,,,.,,,.,,,.,,.,,.,,,.,,.,,,.,,.,,.,.,,.. 2,.. 3,,., 5
4 ,, , ).,,. 1950, 1951.,, , 168 8,000, , 5 10,.,,, 2000, )., 4,700, 9,000.,, 6, 3.,.,,, 168.,. 3,.,, 7).,, 8).,, 5),.., (1989). 6) 1999,., ) (2000),. 8), ( ), ( 13 ).,,. 6
5 : ( ) 9).,, 2002,, 3.,,.,.,.,,.,,.,,.,,. 2,., 2000,.,,.,, ,., (2008),.,,.,,., NIRA, 23 17,.,, GDP.,,., 9) 1986,. 7
6 %, 1%,.,,,.,,,.,,,., (2000),.,,,.,.,,.,,.,., 2002, 3 10).,,,.,,.,,,.,,. 3.2, 2%.,.,,.,.,, 10) 70% 2. 8
7 :.,. 6, 1 11),.,, 12)., 1, 2, 3, 4, 13).,,.,,,.,,,.,,.,.,,,.,,. (2000),.,, 14).,,.,, 1% 2% 15)., 11) 2002, 6. 12) (1992), %, %. 13),, , GDP, , ( ), ( ), ( ) ( ). 14) Q&A Q19 (
8 ,.,, 16)., 3,,., , 3.,, 1,,.,, , ( 1).,, , 2.58,.,, 12 17).,,, 18).,,.,, 2.,,.,.,.,,.,,., C, 0.2, 20%.,, 15) (2000),, 1.2%. 16) , ) 2( 18),,. 10
9 : 1 3 (2004 ) A. ( ) 8,606 58,048 22,530 ( ) ( ) ( ) B. 7,742 53,112 20,104 ( ) ( ) ( ) C. 4,427 31,025 10,180 ( ) ( ) ( ) ,.,,.,,.,,,,.,,., (2005),,.,.. 11
10 ,,.,, 19).,,,,., (2005),. 3,, 20)., (2005),,.,,., (1992) 4 4,,.,.,,,. (1992),,., (2007) SNA, 5%,.,. 19),,,,,.,,. 20), (1992), (1990),. 12
11 :, 2,.,,,.,,.,,,, 21). 3.3,,.,,,.,,,,,.,,., 9,000.,,.,,.,., 22)., ( ). (2003),,.,.,, 1.,. 2,., 21), (2005), (2006). 22) , NIRA(2008). 13
12 ,,.,,,.,,.,.,,,., (2009),.,,.,,.,,,,. (2009),, ( 2)., ,., 100%, 100%., %,., ( 3),,, 5.,,,,.,,.,.,, 14
13 : (1) 101, , , , , ,864 (2) 149, , , , , ,772 ((1)/(2)) 68% 68% 72% 70% 68% 70% (1 ), 94% 2. 6,,,.,.,,,.,.,.,,.,.,,.,,.,,,.,,.,.,.,,,, ( ). ( ) ( 19 p.481). 15
14 ( ) 73% 100% ( ) 92% ( ) ( ) 135% ( ) 46% 40% 49% ( ) 35% 41% 26% 51% 44% ( ) 39% ( ) 31% ( ) ( ) 51% ( ) 81% 29% 30% ( ) 74% ( ) 28% 41% 16
15 : ( ) 110% 55% 58% 59% 55% 39% 35% 63% ( PHS ) 53% ( ) 86% 44% 44% 63% 70% 52% 47% 17
16 ( ) (, ) 76% (, ) 80% 39% 54% 80% 72% 82% 51% 24% 40% 52% 115% 104% 69% 84%., (1996) (2007) 1 SNA, SNA 5%, SNA 23)., (1989)., SNA 1,. SNA , 1 97, 8.1, 23),., Atkinson et al (1995) Banks and Johnson (1998). 18
17 : ( ) 0.3., 2005, SNA 1 1.3, ,,, (1996), ( ) ( ),.,,,.,,,,,.,., SNA 24). ( 1) SNA, 20%., 1980,.,,, (,, 1993;, 1993;, ;, 1999).,, 25)., 2,. ( ), 70%., 30%., (2003) 1990,,., (2009),,., 24) Demery and Duck (2006),,,. 25) 1990 (1999). 19
18 % 35 1 SNA SNA( SNA) 5 SNA( SNA) 0 ( ) ,, 2.,,.,,,.,,,.,,,.,,,. 3.4,,.,., 20
19 : 26).,, 2, 27).,.., (1), (. ) (2) (3) 4 (4) (3 ) (5) (6) ( ),.,,,.,,.,, 2. 1,.,,.,,,. 1,.,,.,,,. 3.5,.,,,.,,,.,., ) p.7 ( ). 27) Banks and Johnson (1998),. 21
20 %, %.,,.,., , 2,,.,.,,.,.,,.,, 50,.,.,.,, 28).,,.,,, 1.,, (2005) (p.86).,,., 1.,, 5, 1.,, Deaton (1985) (Pseudo Panel).,, 3 5, ),, (2006). 22
21 :,,.,,.,.,,,.,, 29).,, 30).,,,.,,.,,,.,,,.,,,. 4.,.,, 31)., FES, 10,000, 10 1.,., FES 2, 1 6., CES, 1980, 1 7,000. CES 1, 1, 29) 30).,.. 31), (2007). 23
22 ,,,.,,.,,,.,,.,, Panel Study of Income Dynamics(PSID). PSID, 1968,,., British Household Panel Survey 1991,. 8 2 Encuesta Permanent de Consumo(ECP) 32)., 6,.,,.,, (, 2008).,,,. (1986),, ( ) (Kohara, Ohtake, and Saito, 2002;, 2005; Hori and Shimizutani, 2005a, 2005b, 2006 Shimizutani, 2006, 2006), (2008) ,,,.,,.,, 32), Health and Retirement Study (HRS), English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).,, HRS. 24
23 :.,,,.,, 2000.,, 1., 2.,.,,,.,.,,.,,.,,,., CES. (1992),,,,,., PDA.,.,,.,,,.,,,.,.,,.,,. 5.,,.., % 25
24 ,.,,,.,,.,.,,.,,,.,.,.,,,., 2002,.,.,,,.,,.,.,,.,,.,,,.,,.. (2000) Atkinson, A. B., L. Rainwater, and T. M. Smeeding (1995) Income Distribution in OECD Countries: Evidence 26
25 : from the Luxembourg Income Study, Paris, OECD. Banks, J. and P. Johnson (1998) How Reliable Is the Expenditure Survey?: Trends in Incomes and Expenditures over Time, Institute of Fiscal Studies: London. Deaton, Angus (1985). Panel Data from Time Series of Cross-Sections, Journal of Econometrics vol. 30(1-2), pp Demery, D. and N. W. Duck (2006) Demographic Change and the UK Savings Rate, Applied Economics, vol 38, pp (2001) 93SNA (2007) / 4 (1986) vol.101 pp Hori, M. and S. Shimizutani (2005a) Price Expectations and Consumption under Deflation: Evidence from Japanese Household Survey Data, International Economics and Economic Policy, vol.2, pp Hori, M. and S. Shimizutani (2005b) Consumer Response to the 1994 Tax Cut: Evaluating the Japanese First Tax Cut in the 1990s, Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, vol.46, pp Hori, M. and S. Shimizutani (2006) Did Japanese Consumers Become More Prudent During ? Evidence From Household Level Data, International Economic Journal, vol.20, pp (1995) (1) ( ) 35 (1996) (2) ( ) 37 (2000) GDP (2) GDP 6 24 Kohara, M., F. Ohtake, and M. Saito (2002) A Test of the Full Insurance Hypothesis: The Case of Japan, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, vol.16 (2002) pp (1963) (2000) 2 (1992) (1993) SNA 99 pp (1999) SNA (2005) Ohtake, Fumio and Saito, Makoto, (1998) Population Aging and Consumption Inequality in Japan, Review of Income and Wealth vol. 44(3), pp (2007) / 3 Shimizutani S. (2006) Consumer Response to the 1998 Tax Cut: Is a Temporary Tax Cut Effective? Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, vol.20, pp (2005) 56, pp (2008) NIRA (1989) (1989) 116. (2005) (2006) (1993) ( ) (2003) 27
26 (2006) ( ) (2008) 10 (2009) SNA 10 ( ) (1990) ( ) 71 (1999). (2006)
SNAと家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離－日本の貯蓄率低下の要因－
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-J-003 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-J-003 2009 年 12 月 SNA と家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離 - 日本の貯蓄率低下の要因 - 宇南山卓 ( 神戸大学大学院経済学研究科 ) 要 旨 SNA と家計調査から計算される家計貯蓄率の乖離の原因を明らかにし 日本の貯蓄率の低下の原因を考察した
ミクロ・データによる家計行動分析： 将来不安と予備的貯蓄
subjective measures E-mailkeiko.murata@mfs.cao.go.jp subjective subjective measures Dardanoni Leland waiting option Browning and LusardiEngen and Gruber Carroll and Samwick PSIDPanel Study of Income Dynamics
日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について：アップデートと考察
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 18-J-024 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 18-J-024 2018 年 8 日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について : アップデートと考察 1 宇南 卓 ( 経済産業研究所 ) 野太郎 ( 信州 学 ) 要 旨 全国消費実態調査 家計調査 家計消費状況調査を補完的に利用することでマクロ統計と整合的な貯蓄率のデータを構築した宇南山
表紙＿目次.PDF
JIL 2 1980 vol.3 15 3 1 3 15 18 IT 26 28 33 20 OECD 80 90 (1998) (2000) 2 Aghion et al. (1999) OECD 1970 1 2 70 1980 90 1.1 Kuznets U inverted U-shaped hypothesis GNP U 1 18901940 6 3 Kuznets(1955) (1963)
JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Creative Scientific Research Understanding Inflation Dynamics of the Japanese Economy Working Paper Series No.7 日本家計の消費 貯蓄 労働プロ
Title 日本家計の消費 貯蓄 労働プロファイル Author(s) 阿部, 修人 ; 稲倉, 典子 Citation Issue 2007-02-14 Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/13627 Right Hitotsubashi University Repository
日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析
196 2017 * ** ** 1 2 3 JEL Classification Codes D14, D15, E21 Keywords * 28 Hyun- Hoon Lee Robert Owen Kwanho Shin ** 29 196 An Empirical Analysis of the Saving Behavior of Elderly Households in Japan
2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom
1) IOC Major League Baseball s MLB Blue Ribbon Panel Levin et al. 1) Yamamura and Shin, 2005 a ; 2005 b ; 2005 c communication 2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura,
橡同居選択における所得の影響（DP原稿）.PDF
** *** * 2000 13 ** *** (1) (2) (1986) - 1 - - 2 - (1986) Ohtake (1991) (1993) (1994) (1996) (1997) (1997) Hayashi (1997) (1999) 60 Ohtake (1991) 86 (1996) 89 (1997) 92 (1999) 95 (1993) 86 89 74 79 (1986)
46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦
463420101 1. 1989, Yoshida and Rasche1990, Rasche1990, 19921997, Fujiki and Mulligan1996, 1996, Sekine1998, 2001, Fujiki2002, 2003, 2004 Bahmani-Oskooee and Shabsigh1996, Amano and Wirjanto2000, Bahmani-Oskooee
Masanori Hashimoto Rene Fahr and Hilmar Schneider 1. Hashimoto, Masanori Fahr, Rene and Hilmar Schneider Hashimoto, Masanori 2004 Fahr
17 6 22 Masanori Hashimoto Rene Fahr and Hilmar Schneider 1. Hashimoto, Masanori Fahr, Rene and Hilmar Schneider 2. 2004 Hashimoto, Masanori 2004 Fahr, Rene and Hilmar Schneider 2004-1 - Fahr and Schneider2004
-February GDP GDP
-February GDP GDP - GDP. GDP GDP / GDP DI.. DI..,,. -February (2010=100) 115 110 105 100 95 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 800 350 750 700 300 650 600 250 550
税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析
Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title Author(s) 税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析 Uemura, Toshiyuki, 上村, 敏之 ; Kitamura Takayuki, 金田, 陸幸 Citation 経済学論究, 69(4): 1-16 Issue Date 2016-3-20 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10236/14671
untitled
2 book conference 1990 2003 14 Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 M1,M2 M1 Sekine(1998) Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 1. (1989), Yoshida and Rasche(1990), Rasche(1990), 19921997, Fujiki and Mulligan(1996),
Becker 1965 Gronau a a a
1 1 1 1 1 3.3 6 0.43 0.45 2 2002 Becker1965 Gronau1977 1 a 3.3 3.6 6.0 4.9 4.8 3.6 a 7.4 8.4 8.1 7.6 7.5 6.5 0.45 0.43 0.74 0.64 0.64 0.55 1995 a Vol. 42 No. 2 II III IV V VI VII 1 1998Nishioka 199820022002
Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC
90 ª ª * E-mailshinobu.nakagawa@boj.or.jp i ii iii iv SNA 1 70 80 2 80 90 80 80 90 1 80 90 98 6 1 1 SNA 2 1 SNA 80 1SNA 1 19931998 1 2-190 1,2 2 2-2 2-3,4 3 2-5 4 2030 2-3 3 2-15 97 20 90 2-15 9198 1.
高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―
196 2017 * ** ** ** ** 160 2 2 JEL Classification Codes E21, E22, J11 Keywords * ESRI 28 ESRI 29 3 17 ESRI ** 115 196 Population Aging and Domestic Investment An Analysis Using International Panel Data
COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho
COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate School of Economics and Institute of Economic Research
1991 1991 FAX e-mail 1999.12. 1 1999.12. 31 042-783-2305 4342 194-0298 F 042-783-2311 79 98.11 A4.39 97.11 21 A5.90 97. A5.286 98. 21 A5.197 99.10 A5.276 99.10 B5.22 99.10 B5.24 99. B40.170 99. A5.174
The Institute for Economic Studies Seijo University 6 1 20, Seijo, Setagaya Tokyo 157-8511, Japan The Institute for Economic Studies Green Paper No. 59 Consumers Decision on the Choice of Small Payment
2 2 3 4 5 5 6 10 14 17 18 18 20
1. 1990 2001 38 02 2. 90 3. 00 3 4. 02 5.5 3.6 2 5. 02 03 GDP 0 2 2 3 4 5 5 6 10 14 17 18 18 20 1930 50 81090 10 2001 38 2.2 2.301 7 02 3.603 5 3.5 FRB03 2 11 BS BS BS 90 1 Personal Income and Its Disposition
Attendance Demand for J-League õ Shinsuke KAWAI* and Takeo HIRATA* Abstract The purpose of this study was to clarify the variables determining the attendance in J-league matches, using the 2,699 J-league
_16_.indd
well-being well-being well-being Cantril Ladder well-being well-being Cantril Self-Anchoring Striving Scale Cantril Ladder Ladder Ladder awellbeing well-being well-being Gallup World Poll World Database
Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003
266 Vol. 44 No. 3 I 序論 Mirrlees 1971 Diamond 1998 Saez 2002 Kaplow 2008 1 700 900 1, 300 1, 700 II III IV V II わが国の再分配の状況と国際比較 OECD Forster and Mira d Ercole 2005 2006 2001 Winter 08 267 図 1 図 2 2000 2
保障領域のニーズシフトに関する研究
SSJDA25 June 2003 1 5 12 35 60 68 2001 2001 40 51-1 - ( - 2 - 63 12 63 12 3 12 12 Deaton and Paxon(1993,1994),Deaton(1997) - 3 - - 4 - ( ) (0,1) (1) Crosby(1987), (Own Egent) 1 1. 1.1 1.2 63 12 2. 2.1
28 Vol. 43 No. 1 2 Burchardt, Le Grand & Piachaud 1999 Bradshaw et al Gordon et al.2000 Whelan et al.2002 poverty de
27 2002 1998 1999 EC2000 National Action Plans for Social Inclusion 1 1 2 3 4 16 18 1 2 2 1 28 Vol. 43 No. 1 2 Burchardt, Le Grand & Piachaud 1999 Bradshaw et al. 2000 Gordon et al.2000 Whelan et al.2002
遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』
2-1. (2-1 ) (2-2 ) (2-3 ) (Hayashi [1986]Dekle [1989]Barthold and Ito [1992] [1996]Campbell [1997] [1998]Shimono and Ishikawa [2002]Shimono and Otsuki [2006] [2008]Horioka [2009]) 1 2-1-1 2-1-1-1 8 (1.
ボーナス制度と家計貯蓄率－サーベイ・データによる再検証－
ESRI Discussion Paper Series No.139 by May 2005 Economic and Social Research Instute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan * 400 : JEL classification: D12, E21 * 186-8603 2-1 042-580-8369 FAX 042-580-8333 1 Abstract
untitled
[ 研究ノート ] 4% 19 19 20 1997a 20 Mitchell, 2002: 123 208 1997b; 2008 2 1960 1980 Abdel-Fadil, 1975; Hansen, 1969; Radwan & Lee, 1986 Abdel-Fadil, 1980; 85 Assaad, 1997 2 Hopkins Hopkins & Westergaard, 1998:
ワールド・ワイド １０‐２（Ｐ）／３．中尾
28 1 35 35 1 2003 35 2 3 4 29 1965 1998 35 1000 5 647 1960 6 35 7 8 2 30 10 2 2. 1 2. 2 2. 3 3 3. 1 3. 2 4 2 2 2. 1 9 1 2003 1 647 10 t π macro 1 1964 1998 31 t- π macro 7.21 0.12 t 31.3610.65 R 2 0.77
1. 2. (Rowthorn, 2014) / 39 1
,, 43 ( ) 2015 7 18 ( ) E-mail: sasaki@econ.kyoto-u.ac.jp 1 / 39 1. 2. (Rowthorn, 2014) 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 2 / 39 1 ( 1). ( 2). = +. 1. g. r. r > g ( 3).. 3 / 39 2 50% Figure I.1. Income inequality in the
1 1. Essays on the Risk Premium in the U.S. Financial Markets, 1992 6 2 1. 2015 10 2. 290 2015 5 3. 358 2014 8 4. 299 2012 3 5. 286 2011 10 6. 233 201
186-0004 1. 2. 2 3. 33 4. 17 5. 48 6. 2 7. 16 8. 3 NIRA 9. 44 1 1. Essays on the Risk Premium in the U.S. Financial Markets, 1992 6 2 1. 2015 10 2. 290 2015 5 3. 358 2014 8 4. 299 2012 3 5. 286 2011 10
300 SPSS UN Population Divis
18 300 2000 filial piety 300 SPSS 1 1950 22.3 1995 39.7 1995 125.6 2005 127.7 2050 104.9 15-64 1995 87.2 2050 57.1 65 1995 18.3 14.62045 34.0 2050 33.3 31.8UN Population Division, 2000 : 49-54 1 1995 44.9
Value Added Tax VAT Mirrlees, J. VAT The Mirrlees Review The Structure and Reform of Direct Taxation Report of a Committee chaired by Professor J. E. Meade Dimensions of Tax Design Mirrlees 2010 Tax by
第１章Word版.PDF
2007 21 1564 1 15 (a) (b) (c) 80 90 90 (a)(b)(c) 90 2 90 90 3.8 13.1 90 2.6 1.2 1998 19982025 0.43 202550 0.94 90 0.14 0.08 0.87 0.91 1.71 2.10 1.93 1.88 3 1998 81 80 90 1.9 2.5 90 0.5 70 3.5 80 2.8 70
財政のサステナビリティと長期金利の動向
* nakaza-t@hoffman.cc.sophia.ac.jp ** yutaka.soejima@boj.or.jp ()*** **** munehisa.kasuya@boj.or.jp No.03-J-7 2003 10 103-8660 30 * **()******* * ** () *** **** 2003 10 (i) (ii) Keywords: government bonds,
OECD INVEST JAPAN jp/ij/index.htm
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Title OECD 諸国における経営資源の収益率の推計 Sub Title Rates of return on managerial resources : the case of OECD countries Author 遠藤, 正寛 (Endoh, Masahiro) Publisher 慶應義塾大学出版会 Publication
ＧＤＰギャップと潜在成長率
2003 output gap 80 1 20 90 20 70 2 1 2 output gap potential output 1 2 (2001) 3 potential rate of growth 2000 Meyer (2000) European Central Bank: (1999b) 2002 10 4 3 (2000) 4 4 () 5 5 5 6 () () 7 Total
自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書
17 1 2 3 4 5 11 16 30,247 17 18 21,024 +2.0 6 12 13 WHO 100 14 7 15 2 5 8 16 9 10 17 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 II I 18 Durkheim(1897) Hamermesh&Soss(1974)Dixit&Pindyck(1994) Becker&Posner(2004) Rosenthal(1993)
, 3, 1999, 4,,
1, 1992 2005,,, 10 2,, 1992 1998 1,,, 1998 2002 2,, 3,,, 2002, 2002 3 1 2 1 , 3, 1999, 4,, 3 14 11 2 I, 10,, 1992 2005, 2,, 3, 4,, II,, 1992 1998 1,, 1998 2002 2 2002 3 II-1: 1 1993 1998 90,, 1995 6850,,
Ishi
Ishi HPhttp: // www.mof.go.jp / jouhou / syuzei / siryou /.htm.. or ERTA, TRA ERTA Economic Recovery Tax Act TRA Tax Reform Act Mroz Triest Lindsey Burtless Navrati Lindsey Burtless Navrati CPS Current
C. R. McKenzie 2003 3 2004 ( 38 ) 2 2004 2005 (Keio Household Panel Survey) control group treatment group 1
KEIO UNIVERSITY MARKET QUALITY RESEARCH PROJECT (A 21 st Century Center of Excellence Project) DP2005-020 * C. R. McKenzie** 2003 3 2004 ( 38 ) 2 2004 2005 (Keio Household Panel Survey) control group treatment
50-4 平井健之.pwd
GDP GNP Gupta 1967, Wagner and Weber 1977, Mann 1980, Abizadeh and Gray 1985, Ram 1987, Abizadeh and Yousefi 1988, Nagarajan and Spears 1990 GDP GNP GDP GNP GDP GNP Adolph Wagner Wagner 1967 Ram 1987,
untitled
1 2 (1) (1962) 1972 3 (2) NGO 4 5 6 7 1955 1962 1962 8 1972 MIT 100 9 70 10 ? 11 1/4 3/4 3/4 1/4 5 1 12 1 1 4 FAO 3000 4 1 ODA 1/10 US 1/25 1/2 88 1/7( /WHO ) 12 1980-2000 GDP US 2006 13 Note: North includes
OSIPPニュースレター.indd
Osaka School of International Public Policy OSIPP NEWSLETTER Vol.60 Spring 2012 OSIPP NEWSLETTER vol.60 01 02 OSIPP NEWSLETTER vol.60 OSIPP NEWSLETTER vol.60 03 04 OSIPP NEWSLETTER vol.60 The basic economics
untitled
* 2001 (B) ** 113-0033 7-3-1 TEL(03)5841-5641FAX(03)5841-5521iwamoto@e.u-tokyo.ac.jp 1990 1990 1 2 3 1 (2002) 2 social infrastructure social capital Woolcook (1998) 3-1 - - 2 - 1990 Mera (1973) G Cobb-Douglas
公務員倫理問題への新アプローチ
OECD CPI CPI CPI CPI CPI CPI / GDP / / / /.............................. Transparency International Corruption Perception Index CPI CPI 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
12056286_03.indd
: 82 1 2013 7 2010 2011 1 30 2010 30 2011 30 2010 9 10 11 2011 1 2 1 2010 9 UK UK UK UK UK p. 843 45 82 1 1 UK 9 9 2007-08 UK 30% 30 20%30 150 30 32.5% 2030% p. 843 3 2004-05 5% 5% 75% p. 843 2010 11 1963
Vol.3.indb
123 124 Migration Policy Review 2011 Vol.3 125 126 Migration Policy Review 2011 Vol.3 127 128 Migration Policy Review 2011 Vol.3 129 130 Migration Policy Review 2011 Vol.3 131 132 Migration Policy Review
論文０８.indd
* 1 はじめに,, TOPIX TOPIX, TOPIX TOPIX Shelor Anderson and Cross C Japan Society of Monetary Economics 図 1 東日本大震災前後の株価 (TOPIX) の推移 1,000 950 900 850 800 750 700 図 2 阪神大震災前後の株価 (TOPIX) の推移 1,650 1,550 1,450
JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 111 Vol.28 No.32008
Vol.28 No.32008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 111 Vol.28 No.32008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 111 Vol.28 No.32008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 111 Vol.28 No.32008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 111 Vol.28 No.32008 JAPAN MARKETING
JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 113 Vol.29 No.12009
JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 113 Vol.29 No.12009 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 113 Vol.29 No.12009 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 113 Vol.29 No.12009 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 113 Vol.29 No.12009 Vol.29 No.12009 JAPAN MARKETING
JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 110 Vol.28 No.22008
Vol.28 No.22008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 110 Vol.28 No.22008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 110 Vol.28 No.22008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 110 Vol.28 No.22008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 110 Vol.28 No.22008 JAPAN MARKETING
..,,...,..,...,,.,....,,,.,.,,.,.,,,.,.,.,.,,.,,,.,,,,.,,, Becker., Becker,,,,,, Becker,.,,,,.,,.,.,,
J. of Population Problems. pp.,,,.,.,,. Becker,,.,,.,,.,,.,,,,.,,,.....,,. ..,,...,..,...,,.,....,,,.,.,,.,.,,,.,.,.,.,,.,,,.,,,,.,,, Becker., Becker,,,,,, Becker,.,,,,.,,.,.,, ,,, Becker,,., Becker,
#10094931_信金7月号.indb
2006. 7 2006 7 2 4 24 41 58 84 85 97 99 2006 7 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55
公的年金制度の考え方と抜本改革の方向性.pdf
9 8 1 (1) (9-1-1) (9-1-2) ( ) 9-1-1 9-1-3 1997 ( 9) 97 70 97 70 ( ) 60 60 15 60 97 70 60 ( 15 ) 2 5 3 60 9-1-2 GNP 40 147 60 1 9-1-2 60 60 40 (9-1-3) (9-1-4) ( ) 9-1-3 30 40 9-1-4 60 30 40 (9-1-5) (9-1-6)
RIETI Highlight VOL.25
RIETI Highlight 2009 SUMMER 25 VOL. Research Digest RIETI 2009 SUMMER VOL. 25 Highlight 1 2 3 5 8 10 12 13 14 19 ResearchDigest 20 24 28 32 36 38 40 41 42 44 45 RIETI Topics 01 CONTENTS 02 RIETI Highlight
<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>
2011 Vol.60 No.2 p.138 147 Performance of the Japanese long-term care benefit: An International comparison based on OECD health data Mie MORIKAWA[1] Takako TSUTSUI[2] [1]National Institute of Public Health,
bc0710_010_015.indd
Case Study.01 Case Study.02 30 Case Study.05 Case Study.03 Case Study.04 Case Study.06 Case Study.07 Case Study.08 Case Study.21 Case Study.22 Case Study.24 Case Study.23 Case Study.25 Case Study.26
OTC 2 3 4 1970 21 2025 196136 197348 1990 202537 75 1970 21 2025 21 2025 5 20609000 40 24 14,000 1564 12,708 12,000 11,662 10,000 8,000 6,000 1564 61.3% 26.0% 3,685 6,773 65 8,674 3,464 50.9% 39.9% 65
<96D889BA904D2E696E6464>
615 379 1 1995 10 OECD 1995 380 616 57 3 1993 4 3071 2003 1 3247 10 10 4 1 1990 2000 2003 10 617 381 2002 2 3 4 5 2 1 1990 1995 1995 12 1995 IPP Independent Power Producer 1 2004a, b 2005a, b 382 618 57
Autumn II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 分析に用いるデータ
212 Vol. 44 No. 2 I はじめに 2008 1 2 Autumn 08 213 II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 17 18 1 分析に用いるデータ 1 2005 10 12 200 2 2006 9 12 1 1 2 129 35 113 3 1 2 6 1 2 3 4 4 1
インドネシアの社会経済調査と貧困ライン
Working Paper Series Vol. 2008-01 2008 4 Working Paper Susenas Susenas 1 1 803-0814 11-4 E-mail shondai@icsead.or.jp 1 1 1980 1990 97 8 1976 40 1984 27 1996 18 2005 16 BPS 2005/2006e 3,500 3 2 2,330 1
フリーターの増加と労働所得格差の拡大
ESRI Discussion Paper Series No.140 by May 2005 Economic and Social Research Institute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan 太田清 2 1 本稿の作成に当たり 内閣府経済社会総合研究所の香西泰所長 浜田浩児情報交流部長をはじめ 内閣府経済社会総合研究所でのセミナーの参加者の方々より また 大阪大学社会経済研究所の大竹文雄教授より貴重なコメントをいただいた
292 Vol. 44 No refundable tax credit Mirrlees 1971 Friedman
Winter 08 291 I はじめに Shinozaki 2005 2006 OECD United Nations 2007 OECD 2008 2 1 2006 2005 2 2006 refundable tax credit 2006 292 Vol. 44 No. 3 3 1 2 refundable tax credit 3 10 5 5 10 5 2 1 Mirrlees 1971
BB 報告書完成版_修正版）040415.doc
3 4 5 8 KW Q = AK α W β q = a + α k + βw q = log Q, k = log K, w = logw i P ij v ij P ij = exp( vij ), J exp( v ) k= 1 ik v i j = X β αp + γnu j j j j X j j p j j NU j j NU j (
8
7 8 9 1 1-1 1-2 2002 1 2000 10 1-3 2002 2 2000 11 2 3 WHO19951979 19952002p.47 4 22 5 12 2-1 18681919 6 1965 13 2-2 19201945 14 15 2-3 19461960 7 16 17 2-4 19611979 GDP 18 1956300 2,000 1960 11 1972 231006
Tomorrow Next th draft version MEW SWET
Research Center for Price Dynamics A Research Project Concerning Prices and Household Behaviors Based on Micro Transaction Data Working Paper Series No.7 Tomorrow Next を用いた金融政策の分析 青野幸平 June 14, 2012 4th
untitled
........ ,..,..,..,,..,..,.. ,. , OECD ............ / :........................ :........ ... .. OECD OECD....... OECD Health Data ,, , :..... JR.... ,.. t-pa NICU ICU ICU.... NICU NICU NICU NICU.....
,,,
法定割増賃金率の引き上げが時間外労働時間 * および有給休暇の付与 取得に与える影響 深堀遼太郎萩原里紗 Keio Household Panel Survey: KHPS Difference in Differences DD ,,, Hamermesh, Trejo, Keio Household Panel Survey: KHPS KHPS URL http://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/
5 I The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthenin
5 I. 3 1 1990 2 The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthening North Pacific Cooperation organized by the East-West
Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series No.248 東京圏における 1990 年代以降の住み替え行動 住宅需要実態調査 を用いた Mixed Logit 分析 小林庸平行武憲史 March 2008 Hitotsubashi University Research Unit
Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series No.248 東京圏における 1990 年代以降の住み替え行動 住宅需要実態調査 を用いた Logit 分析 小林庸平行武憲史 March 2008 Hitotsubashi University Research Unit for Statistical Analysis in Social Sciences A 21st-Century
主な著書
2012 年 6 月 現 在 著 書 1. 期 待 と 不 確 実 性 の 経 済 学 -デフレ 経 済 のミクロ 実 証 分 析 ( 清 水 谷 諭 ) 日 本 経 済 新 聞 社, 2005 年 2 月. 2. 介 護 保 育 サービス 市 場 の 経 済 分 析 -ミクロデータによる 実 態 解 明 と 政 策 提 言 ( 清 水 谷 諭, 野 口 晴 子 ) 東 洋 経 済 新 報 社, 2004
No.42 2010.9 30 4 EITC, Earned Income Tax Credit WTC, Working Tax Credit; CTC, Child Tax Credit GSTC, Goods and Services Tax Credit 3 5 2006 a2006 b 2
1 16 2 3 2008 4 4 in work tax credit welfare to work ALMPs 1990 *1965 1988 1994 1988 2003 2007 2007 2009 35 2009 1 20 2 21 1 21 3 No.42 2010.9 30 4 EITC, Earned Income Tax Credit WTC, Working Tax Credit;
160203_02_kojima_四_e.indd
16 2 3 2016 7 27 1. 19 EU Cren et Tersigni 2014 1990 1993 2010 7 1 20032005, 2006 20082009 2014 2005200620122015 2009 2009 2012 20082009 2011 Ando and Horiguchi 20132014a2015 2015 2004, 2004, 2007 28 2012
%,, % %......
Purchase Decision Process of Earthquake Insurance and Policy Sales Methodologies in Japan Hiroyuki NOZAKI * and Akiyoshi TAKAGI ** Abstract The purpose of this study is to investigate how fire insurance
p *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2
2013 1 nabe@ier.hit-u.ac.jp 2013 4 11 Jorgenson Tobin q : Hayashi s Theorem : Jordan : 1 investment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 *1 *1 93SNA 1 p.180 1936 100 1970 *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian
第一次大戦後の日本における国債流通市場の制度改革
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 2009-J-23 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 103-8660 2-1-1 http://www.imes.boj.or.jp IMES Discussion Paper Series 2009-J-23 2009
toukei11.dvi
2003 51 2 373 388 c 2003 2003 2 12 2003 5 14 1998 69 4 1. 1 8 11 2 2002 560 0043 1 7 374 51 2 2003 3 4 microeconometrics applied econometrics applied economic statistics 5 6 1998 30 7 1970 8 1998 69 9
デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程
1991 2003 GDP....................................... http://www.stat.go.jp/ http://www.boj.or.jp/ GDP http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/ GDP - - - inflation targeting Krugman a IS-LM liquidity trap Krugman b Krugman
2 / 24
2017 11 9 1 / 24 2 / 24 Solow, 1957 total factor productivity; TFP 5% 経済成長率の要因分解 4% 3% 2.68% 2.51% 2% 1% 0% 1.63% 1.50% 0.34% 0.42% 0.55% 0.97% 1.14% 0.86% 0.13% -0.59% -0.59% -0.09% 0.01% -1% 1970-80
Economic Outlook 79 Pay-as-you-go Pay-as-you-go Pay-as-you-go Pay-as-you-go Girouard and André (2005)van den Noord (2000) Giorno et al (1995) () The Budget and Economic Outlook Fiscal Years 2007 to 2016
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8660 30 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J-45 199912 12 1986 General Agreement of Trade in Service Multilateral
Kobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI ごみ有料化は自治体の財政負担をどれだけ軽減するのか?(Does Unitbased Pricing of
◆ニュースレターNo55ファイルサイズ圧縮：ウェブ用個人情報省略版
Japan Society of Family Sociology Newsletter No. 55 2015 11 9 102-8554 - TEL03-3238-3783 252 200 11 2018 8 1 26 17 25 2 17 25 2 18 25 2 (ISA) 18 12 20142 13 20 17 1 25 25 956225 9672 200 WAM 25 (1) 1.
【表紙】経済学論叢＿１８号／表１・３・背
Blanchard Solow Solow Galor and Tsiddon ,, , ,, ,,,,,, a if b c if if CES CES,,,,,,. Bowles Ciccone and Peri, .,, Bowles Hamermesh Antras Ciccone and Peri CES CES Krusell et al. Duffy et al. Hornstein
和RIMNo.22高安氏.indd
NIEsGDP 1990 200436.1 22.365.1 80 GDP 4 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22 5 NIEs GDP GDP GDP GDP 90 GDP 1951 80 81 90 90 90 2001 2003 GDP 80 90 2001 2002 GDP 87GDP 80 GDP GDP 6 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22
フィナンシャルレビュー 第80号
March Eichner et al. Tobit Tobit Buntin and Zaslavsk Duan et al.hay and Olsen Mullahy Tobit ARMA Feenberg and Skinner French and Jones Eichner et al. Eichner et al i t m i,t Em i,t Prm i,t!prm i,t Em i,t
6) 7) MBO management buy-out 2 necessity sufficiency ) 21
1) 1997 15 02 03 751 1998 8 9 04 1996 16.1% 17.5% 26.9% 64.9% 63.3% 48.9% 2) 02 54.8% 59.0% 61.8% 78.6% 46.5% 1996 17.8% 19.9% 18.7% 42% 11.9% 3) 4) 01 3 1 3 2 03 04 1 TCL 5) Vol. 52, No. 4, October 06
取引銀行の破綻が企業経営に及ぼす影響について－阪和銀行破綻の事例分析－
2 JEL Classification: G21, G14 Key words: e-mail y-murakami@aria.ocn.ne.jp 1 The Effect of Bank Failure on Client Firms A Study on the Hanwa Bank s Failure By Yoshiko Murakami Abstract The financial theories
OECD Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. Mottla and Utkus Rooiji et al. Atkinson et al. MacFarland et al. Elton et al. Tang et al. Benartzi and Thaler Br
IFRS. OECD Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. Mottla and Utkus Rooiji et al. Atkinson et al. MacFarland et al. Elton et al. Tang et al. Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. /n Benartzi and Thaler n /n Benartzi
201609発達・教育臨床論コース
葛 葛 遡 ONISHI Kimie 1971 7 14 2013 4 1900-30 2013 4 2013 4 2013 4 1950 2009 6 4 1 257-288 2012 3 4 145-187 2013 3 1 16-39 5 84-107 7 368-383 18 2008 8 80-85 100 18330178 2009 3 223-248 1930 20530686
1997 2005 2009 22.9 32.0 25.6 22.4 36.0 29.2 23.9 22.0 15.7 HPI-1(%) 20.4 30.7 27.7 12.4 8.5 40 2005-2010 15 (%) 1999-2007 (%) 2006 (%) 2000-2006 19.1 13.1 18.5 5.8 11.3 10.1 27.3 23.7 9.7 5.9 20 40 35
物流からみた九州地方の地域的都市システムの変容
Working Paper Series Vol. 2009-05 2009 2 Working Paper 14 10 13 18 194-0298 4342 E-mail pakugen69@hosei.ac.jp 1 Pred 1977 1985 1994 2001 Murayama 1982,1984 Friedmann 1986 1994 2001 1 2 1979 1984 1991 2005
Preliminary Version Manning et al. (1986) Rand Health Insurance Experiment Manning et al. (1986) 3 Medicare Me
Preliminary Version. 600 * 14530029 12-1- Preliminary Version. 1 70 1 1997 9 1020 70 1 3 2 70 1 Manning et al. (1986) Rand Health Insurance Experiment 25 50 Manning et al. (1986) 3 Medicare Medicare Medicare
雇用と年金の接続 在職老齢年金の就業抑制効果と老齢厚生年金受給資格者の基礎年金繰上げ受給要因に関する分析 The Labour Market Behaviour of Older People: Analysing the Impact of the Reformed "Earning Test"
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Title 雇用と年金の接続 : 在職老齢年金の就業抑制効果と老齢厚生年金受給資格者の基礎年金繰上げ受給要因に関する分析 Sub Title The labour market behaviour of older people: analysing the impact of the reformed "Earning test"
社会階層と食生活
35 59 822 68.7% 15.4% 27.5% 50.0% 81.2% 91.1% 1 1 1946 66.4% 1980 30% 20% 2 (Sociological Theory and Methods) 81 2010, Vol.25, No.1: 81 93 2 2.1 1) Bourdieu and Passeron 1970 Bourdieu 1979 1990: I 276-8