shuron.dvi

Similar documents
Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) ,

(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008)

2015 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1

Masahiro NAKANO Keynes benchmark Keynes 89

Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 53 動学的資本税協調と公的資本形成 あらまし Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Batina はじめに Zodr

PFI

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察


Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C

LLG-R8.Nisus.pdf


重力方向に基づくコントローラの向き決定方法

1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察


TOP URL 1

振動工学に基礎

Gmech08.dvi

LA-VAR Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2)


1 (Berry,1975) 2-6 p (S πr 2 )p πr 2 p 2πRγ p p = 2γ R (2.5).1-1 : : : : ( ).2 α, β α, β () X S = X X α X β (.1) 1 2

Gmech08.dvi

Untitled

(1987) (1990) (1991) (1996) (1998) (1999) (2000) (2001) (2002) 3 ( ) ( ) hkyo

放射線専門医認定試験(2009・20回)/HOHS‐05(基礎二次)

プログラム

1: 3.3 1/8000 1/ m m/s v = 2kT/m = 2RT/M k R 8.31 J/(K mole) M 18 g 1 5 a v t πa 2 vt kg (

Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

N/m f x x L dl U 1 du = T ds pdv + fdl (2.1)

1. z dr er r sinθ dϕ eϕ r dθ eθ dr θ dr dθ r x 0 ϕ r sinθ dϕ r sinθ dϕ y dr dr er r dθ eθ r sinθ dϕ eϕ 2. (r, θ, φ) 2 dr 1 h r dr 1 e r h θ dθ 1 e θ h

64 3 g=9.85 m/s 2 g=9.791 m/s 2 36, km ( ) 1 () 2 () m/s : : a) b) kg/m kg/m k

bottleneckjapanese.dvi

Gmech08.dvi

.2 ρ dv dt = ρk grad p + 3 η grad (divv) + η 2 v.3 divh = 0, rote + c H t = 0 dive = ρ, H = 0, E = ρ, roth c E t = c ρv E + H c t = 0 H c E t = c ρv T

TOP URL 1

日歯雑誌(H19・5月号)済/P6‐16 クリニカル  柿木 5

遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』

【表紙】経済学論叢_18号/表1・3・背

本文/目次(裏白)

m dv = mg + kv2 dt m dv dt = mg k v v m dv dt = mg + kv2 α = mg k v = α 1 e rt 1 + e rt m dv dt = mg + kv2 dv mg + kv 2 = dt m dv α 2 + v 2 = k m dt d

朕醩佑宖醸æ−žã†®ã†�ã‡†ã†®æ··å’‹æŁ´æŁ°è¨‹çfl»ã…¢ã…⁄ã…«

,398 4% 017,

meiji_resume_1.PDF

N cos s s cos ψ e e e e 3 3 e e 3 e 3 e

Keynes 1936 Tobin 1 Hicks 1937 Keynes IS LM 2 IS LM 3 IS LM Keynes Keynes animal spirits

微分積分 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 初版 1 刷発行時のものです.

1 No.1 5 C 1 I III F 1 F 2 F 1 F 2 2 Φ 2 (t) = Φ 1 (t) Φ 1 (t t). = Φ 1(t) t = ( 1.5e 0.5t 2.4e 4t 2e 10t ) τ < 0 t > τ Φ 2 (t) < 0 lim t Φ 2 (t) = 0

pdf

Hanbury-Brown Twiss (ver. 2.0) van Cittert - Zernike mutual coherence


アロー『やってみて学習』から学習:経済成長にとっての教訓 Learning from `Learning by Doing': Lessons for Economic Growth

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程

No δs δs = r + δr r = δr (3) δs δs = r r = δr + u(r + δr, t) u(r, t) (4) δr = (δx, δy, δz) u i (r + δr, t) u i (r, t) = u i x j δx j (5) δs 2

1 I 1.1 ± e = = - = C C MKSA [m], [Kg] [s] [A] 1C 1A 1 MKSA 1C 1C +q q +q q 1

医系の統計入門第 2 版 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 第 2 版 1 刷発行時のものです.

(1.2) T D = 0 T = D = 30 kn 1.2 (1.4) 2F W = 0 F = W/2 = 300 kn/2 = 150 kn 1.3 (1.9) R = W 1 + W 2 = = 1100 N. (1.9) W 2 b W 1 a = 0

Transcription:

01M3065

1 4 1.1........................... 4 1.2........................ 5 1.3........................ 6 2 8 2.1.......................... 8 2.2....................... 9 3 13 3.1............................. 13 3.2............................. 15 3.3............................... 17 3.4............................... 17 3.5....................... 18 4 20 4.1.......................... 20 4.2....................... 21 4.3........................... 23 4.4............................... 24 4.5.................. 31 4.6................................ 32 A 34 1

14 2001 1400 1 2 Diamond 2 1 3 2 2

4 3 3

1 1.1 1) 2015 4 65 1.1 1.1: 12 P.13 1) 4

1.1 1985 65.6 50.0 2000 2001 1985 20.1 14.3 1999 32% 18% 2000 2001 30.1% 16.5% 1987 1988 3% 1999 32.0 18.0 2 10 1.2 1949 5

1950 1953 1988 2003 1 1.3 15 5 20 25 1 50 5% 20% 5% 25 1 50 35% 20% 6

2 20% 6% 26% 5% 20% 2003 5 5.25% 20% 18% 7

2 2.1 Dynasty Model 1928 Ramsey Overlapping Generations Model) 2 Diamond(1965) Diamond Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) Auerbach and Kotlikoff cobb-dagulas Branchard and Fisher (1989) Azariadis(1993) Summers(1981) Chamely and Wright(1987) 8

2.2 Diamond(1965) 1) 2.1 t t +1 t +2 t +1 t +2 t +1 t t +1 t +2 t +3 1 C y,t C o,t+1 2 C y,t+1 C o,t+2 3 C y,t+2 C o,t+3 2.1: w t s t c y,t r t+1 c o,t+1 t c y,t = w t s t (2.1) c o,t+1 = (1+r t+1 )s t (2.2) 1) Diamond(1965) 9

(2.1) (2.2) c y,t + c o,t+1 1+r t+1 = w t (2.3) u t = u(c y,t,c o,t+1 ) (2.4) u t (2.4) (2.3) w t r t+1 u u =(1+r t+1 ) (2.5) c y,t c o,t+1 (2.5) (2.5) (2.1) s t = s(w t,r t+1 ) (2.6) K t L t Y t = F(K t,l t ) (2.7) Y t n L t =(1+n)L t 1 (2.8) (2.7) L t y t = f(k t ) (2.9) 10

y t k t = K t /L t f (k t+1 )=r t+1 (2.10) w t = f(k t ) f (k t )k t (2.11) (2.10) (2.11) (2.10) (2.11) w t r t w(r t ) 2) s t L t = K t+1 s t = 1 1+n k t+1 (2.12) 2 3) steady state (2.6) (2.10) (2.11) (2.12) k t+1 = 1 1+n s[f(k t) f (k t )k t,f (k t+1 )] = φ(k t ) (2.13) (2.13) uniqueness globally Ihori(1996) 4) 2) w(r t ) lim k 0 φ (k t ) > 0 lim f (k t )=0 k φ (k) 0 for all k > 0 3) (2.12) 4) k t+1 = φ(k t ) φ (k) 0 for all k > 0 ds 0 for all (w,r) 0 dr 11

0 <φ < 1 (2.14) 3 4 3 12

3 3.1 c yt+1 c o,t+1 U t (3.1) U t = ( 1 c 1 1/γ y,t + 1 ) 1 1/γ 1+δ c1 1/γ o,t+1 (3.1) (3.1) γ δ 0 <γ<1 δ >0 s t =(1 ω)w t + g (1 + θ t )c y,t (3.2) s t t w t t g ω θ t t (3.2) 13

s t = 1+θ t+1 1+(1 ρ)r t+1 c o,t+1 (3.3) r t+1 t +1 ρ θ t+1 t +1 (3.3) (3.2) (3.3) (1 ω)w t + g =(1+θ t )c y,t + (3.4) t 1+θ t+1 1+(1 ρ)r t+1 c o,t+1 (3.4) (3.4) (3.1) L = 1 1 1/γ +λ ( c 1 1/γ y,t + 1 ) 1+δ c1 1/γ o,t+1 { (1 ω)w t + g (1 + θ t )c y,t (3.5) } 1+θ t+1 c 1+(1 ρ)r o,t+1 t+1 (3.5) L = c 1/γ y,t λ (1 + θ t ) (3.6) c y,t L c o,t+1 = 1 1+δ c 1/γ o,t λ ( 1+θ t+1 1+(1 ρ)r t+1 L λ = (1 ω)w t + g (1 + θ t )c y,t ) (3.7) 1+θ t+1 1+(1 ρ)r t+1 c o,t+1 (3.8) (3.9) (3.6) (3.7) λ λ = c 1/γ y,t 1+θ t (3.10) λ = 1+(1 ρ)r t+1 (1 + θ t+1 )(1 + δ) c o,t+1 (3.11) 14

(3.10) (3.11) ( ) γ ( ) 1+θt 1+(1 γ ρ)rt+1 c o,t+1 = c y,t (3.12) 1+θ t+1 1+δ (3.12) (3.4) c y,t (1 + θ t+1 ) γ 1 (1 + θ t ) 1 (1 + δ) γ {(1 ω)w t + g} c y,t = (1 + θ t+1 ) (γ 1) (1 + δ) γ +(1+θ t ) γ 1 (1 + (1 ρ)r t+1 ) γ 1 (3.13) (3.13) (3.2) s t = {(1 ω)w t + g}(1 + θ t ) γ 1 (1 + δ) γ (1 + θ t+1 ) γ 1 +(1+θ t ) γ 1 {1+(1 ρ)r t+1 } γ 1 (3.14) 3.2 K t L t cobb-douglas α 0 <α<1 Y t = K α t L1 α t (3.15) Π n Π=Y t w t L t r t K t (3.16) L t+1 =(1+n)L t (3.17) (3.15) (3.16) L t (3.15) L t Y t L t = Kα t L t L t L α t (3.18) 15

(3.18) y t = k α t (3.19) y t k t (3.15) f(0) = 0 f ( ) = 0 f (0) = L t (3.16) L t π = y t w t r t k t (3.20) π (3.20) y t w t r r k t (3.21) (3.20) (3.19) k α t w t r t k t = 0 (3.22) (3.22) k t r t = αk α 1 t (3.23) w t = (1 α)k α t (3.24) 16

(3.23) (3.24) 3.3 TR ω ρ c 1,t τ c L t c 2,t τ c L t 1 L t TR = ωw t L t + ρr t K t + θ t c y,t L t + θ t c o,t L t 1 gl t (3.25) (3.25) 1 L t tr = ωw t + ρr t k t + θ t c y,t + θ tc o,t 1+n g (3.26) 3.4 K t+1 = s t L t (3.27) (3.27) t +1 t (3.27) L t 17

k t+1 = 1 1+n s t (3.28) (3.14) (3.23) (3.24) s t = (1 + θ t ) γ 1 {(1 ω)(1 α)kt α + g} (1 + δ) γ (1 + θ γ 1 t+1 +(1+θ t) { γ 1 1+αkt+1 α 1(1 ρ)} γ 1 (3.29) (3.28) (3.29) k t+1 = 1 1+n (1 + θ t ) γ 1 {(1 ω)(1 α)k α t + g} (1 + δ) γ ( 1+θt+1 1+θ t ) γ 1 + { 1+αk α 1 t+1 (1 ρ)} γ 1 (3.30) (3.30) 3.5 (3.30) k t,k t+1 1) (3.30) k t+1 k t t t +1 dk t+1 dk t = (1 + n) 1 α(1 + θ t ) γ 1 (1 α)k α 1 (1 + δ) γ + X γ 1 +(γ 1)X γ 2 (1 ρ)α(α 1)k α 2 (3.31) X =1+(1 ρ)r dk t+1 /dk t 0 1 dk t+1 /dk t dk t+1 /dk t > 0 dk t+1 /dk t < 1 1) 18

4 k ρ dk dρ = (1 + θ t ) γ 1 X γ 1 αk α 1 (1 + δ) γ + X γ 1 +(γ 1)X γ 2 (1 ρ)(α 1)αk α 2 (1 ω)(1 α)αk α 1(3.32) (3.32) dk/dρ < 0 k ω dk dω = (1 + θ t ) γ 1 (1 α)k α (1 + δ) γ + X γ 1 +(γ 1)X γ 2 (1 ρ)(α 1)αk α 2 (1 ω)(1 α)αk α 1(3.33) 4 19

4 4.1 4.1. 4.1: α 0.4 9.0 % δ 1.0 20.0 % γ 0.3 5.0 % g 0.03 n 0.01 α α =0.5 α =0.4 1) δ 1 40 δ =1.0 γ t t +1 1) 11 0.42 20

(2002) 9.0 % g0.03 2) 20.0 % 5.0 % 4.2 4.1 (3.30) k t 0 10 3 k t+1 10 10 0 k t k t+1 4.1: 2) (2002)P.9 21

4.2 E k t k t+1 E k E 0.00001 4.0 4.2: 0.0000100 4.0000000 1 0.0225498 0.4891471 2 0.0843197 0.2298213 5 0.1517757 0.1575057 10 0.1551752 0.1551991 15 0.1551894 0.1551895 20 0.1551895 0.1551895 21 0.1551895 0.1551895 0.1551895 0.1551895 4.2 21 21 22

4.3 ω ρ (3.33) (3.32) 4.2: 4.2 5% 18 3 23

14 3 4.3: 4.3 5% 3 4.4 4.1 4.3 24

4.2 4.3 α α 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.3 α 4.4: (α ) 4.5: (α ) 25

α 4.6: (α ) 4.7: (α ) α cobb-douglas 26

δ δ 4.8: (δ ) 4.9: (δ ) 27

4.10: (δ ) 4.11: (δ ) δ δ 28

γ γ 4.12: (γ ) 4.13: (γ ) γ 29

4.14: (γ ) 4.15: (γ ) γ α δ γ 4.1 30

4.5 0.074 0.03 0.044 CaseA 20% 25% CaseB 20% 15% CaseC 20% 25% CaseD 20% 15% 4.3: CaseA CaseB CaseC CaseD 0.1552 0.1611 0.1495 0.1533 0.1571 1.2233 1.1961 1.2513 1.2326 1.2144 0.2848 0.2891 0.2805 0.2833 0.2862 0.3493 0.3608 0.3382 0.3574 0.3400-37.2165-34.3528-40.3324-35.1730-39.7667 CaseA CaseB CaseA 9.0% 5.5% 39.2% 3.83% 2.23% 1.51% 3.29% 7.69% 31

CaseB 9.0% 12.4% 37.9% 3.69% 2.28% 1.49% 3.18% 8.37% CaseC CaseD CaseC 5.0% 2.9% 42.3% 1.2% 0.76% 0.5% 2.3% 5.5% CaseD 5.0% 7.3% 46.0% 1.23% 0.73% 0.49% 2.67% 6.85% 4.6 Lucas(1990) Lucas 30% (2001) Lucas(1990) 10% 32

Lucas 36% 40 40 33

A (3.30) ( (1 + δ) γ + { 1+αk α 1 t+1 (1 ρ)} γ 1 ) k t+1 =(1+θ t ) γ 1 {(1 ω)(1 α)k α t + g} { (1 + δ) γ + X γ 1 +(γ 1)X γ 2 (1 ρ)(α 1)αk α 2 t+1 } dk t+1 =(1+θ t ) γ 1 (1 ω)(1 α)αkt α 1 dk t dk t dk t+1 dk t = (1 + θ t ) γ 1 (1 ω)(1 α)αk α 1 (1 + δ) γ + X γ 1 +(γ 1)X γ 2 (1 ρ)(α 1)αk α 2 k 0 <dk t+1 /dk t < 1 2 3 34

[1] A.J.Auerbach and L.J.Kotlikoff(1987), Dynamic fiscal policy, Cambridge University Press. [2] C.Azariadis(1993), Intertemporal Macroeconomics, Blackwell. [3] G.T.McCandless,Jr.,and N.Wallace(1991), Introduction to dynamic macroeconomic theory, Harvard University Press. [4] Ch.Chamley and B.Wright(1987), Fiscal Incidence in Overlapping Generations Model with a Fixed Asset, Journal of Public Economics, Vol.32 [5] J.B.Shoven and J.Whalley(1992), Applying General Equilibrium, Cambridge University Press. [6] L.H.Summers(1981), Capital Taxation and Accumulation in a Life Cycle Growth Model, The American Economic Review, Vol. 71(4) [7] O.J.Branchard and S.Fischer(1989),Lectures on Macroeconomics, MIT Press. [8] P.A.Diamond(1965), National dept in a neoclassical growth model, The American Economic Reviwe, Vol. 55(5) [9] R.Lucas,Jr(1990), Supply-side economics: An analytical review,oxford Economic papers,vol.42,no.2. [10] T.Ihori(1996), Public Finance in an Overlapping Generation Economy, Macmillan Press. [11] (1991),,. 35

[12] (2002), 14,. [13] (1996),,. [14] (1989),,. [15] (2001),,, Vol.52,No.1. [16] (2002), 14,. [17] (2001), 11,. [18] (1994), - -. [19] (1998),,. [20] (2002), 52 1. [21] (1987,,. 36