shuron.dvi

Similar documents
Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) ,

(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008)

2015 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1

Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL

2017 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 exante (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Al

p *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2

Masahiro NAKANO Keynes benchmark Keynes 89

Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 53 動学的資本税協調と公的資本形成 あらまし Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Batina はじめに Zodr

untitled

PFI

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察

# GDP 1 GDP 1992 GDP Hamilton and Flavin (1986) Doi and Ihori(2003) (2007) 2 Bohn(1998) /GDP Bohn # 1 2 Broda



COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho

Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C

LLG-R8.Nisus.pdf

Autumn II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 分析に用いるデータ

O x y z O ( O ) O (O ) 3 x y z O O x v t = t = 0 ( 1 ) O t = 0 c t r = ct P (x, y, z) r 2 = x 2 + y 2 + z 2 (t, x, y, z) (ct) 2 x 2 y 2 z 2 = 0

1 (2005) (2004) (2005) (2006) 1: (2007) 2 2 2: Auerbach, Gokhale and Kotlikoff(1991) Gokhale (2005)


重力方向に基づくコントローラの向き決定方法

untitled

1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察


_07.indd

TOP URL 1

アジ研教科書「マクロ安定化」.PDF

全体編集作業中.PDF

振動工学に基礎

Gmech08.dvi

LA-VAR Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2)


1 (Berry,1975) 2-6 p (S πr 2 )p πr 2 p 2πRγ p p = 2γ R (2.5).1-1 : : : : ( ).2 α, β α, β () X S = X X α X β (.1) 1 2

Public Pension and Immigration The Effects of Immigration on Welfare Inequality The immigration of unskilled workers has been analyzed by a considerab

Gmech08.dvi

Untitled

(1987) (1990) (1991) (1996) (1998) (1999) (2000) (2001) (2002) 3 ( ) ( ) hkyo

放射線専門医認定試験(2009・20回)/HOHS‐05(基礎二次)

プログラム

1: 3.3 1/8000 1/ m m/s v = 2kT/m = 2RT/M k R 8.31 J/(K mole) M 18 g 1 5 a v t πa 2 vt kg (

Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC

xia2.dvi

untitled

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

N/m f x x L dl U 1 du = T ds pdv + fdl (2.1)

arxiv: v1(astro-ph.co)

global imbalances ) * 1

1. z dr er r sinθ dϕ eϕ r dθ eθ dr θ dr dθ r x 0 ϕ r sinθ dϕ r sinθ dϕ y dr dr er r dθ eθ r sinθ dϕ eϕ 2. (r, θ, φ) 2 dr 1 h r dr 1 e r h θ dθ 1 e θ h

64 3 g=9.85 m/s 2 g=9.791 m/s 2 36, km ( ) 1 () 2 () m/s : : a) b) kg/m kg/m k

02.„o“φiflì„㙃fic†j

bottleneckjapanese.dvi

Gmech08.dvi

_03.indd

研究シリーズ第40号

.2 ρ dv dt = ρk grad p + 3 η grad (divv) + η 2 v.3 divh = 0, rote + c H t = 0 dive = ρ, H = 0, E = ρ, roth c E t = c ρv E + H c t = 0 H c E t = c ρv T

TOP URL 1

日歯雑誌(H19・5月号)済/P6‐16 クリニカル  柿木 5

遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』

【表紙】経済学論叢_18号/表1・3・背

1990年代以降の日本の経済変動

プログラム

本文/目次(裏白)

m dv = mg + kv2 dt m dv dt = mg k v v m dv dt = mg + kv2 α = mg k v = α 1 e rt 1 + e rt m dv dt = mg + kv2 dv mg + kv 2 = dt m dv α 2 + v 2 = k m dt d

朕醩佑宖醸æ−žã†®ã†�ã‡†ã†®æ··å’‹æŁ´æŁ°è¨‹çfl»ã…¢ã…⁄ã…«

,398 4% 017,

K

meiji_resume_1.PDF

N cos s s cos ψ e e e e 3 3 e e 3 e 3 e

Keynes 1936 Tobin 1 Hicks 1937 Keynes IS LM 2 IS LM 3 IS LM Keynes Keynes animal spirits

微分積分 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 初版 1 刷発行時のものです.

1 No.1 5 C 1 I III F 1 F 2 F 1 F 2 2 Φ 2 (t) = Φ 1 (t) Φ 1 (t t). = Φ 1(t) t = ( 1.5e 0.5t 2.4e 4t 2e 10t ) τ < 0 t > τ Φ 2 (t) < 0 lim t Φ 2 (t) = 0

Taro-修士論文.PDF

物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―

448 Vol. 44 No 図

Title 経済政策における時間非整合性 : 展望 Author(s) 木内, 祐輔 Citation 大阪大学経済学. 55(3) P.45-P.63 Issue Date Text Version publisher URL

税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析

pdf

chap9.dvi

QMII_10.dvi

Vol.3.indb

Hanbury-Brown Twiss (ver. 2.0) van Cittert - Zernike mutual coherence

New Public Management NPM Walsh Leibenstein, H. X Leibenstein1966 Leibenstein1969 X X X X Blois ue


ver.1 / c /(13)

アロー『やってみて学習』から学習:経済成長にとっての教訓 Learning from `Learning by Doing': Lessons for Economic Growth

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程

No δs δs = r + δr r = δr (3) δs δs = r r = δr + u(r + δr, t) u(r, t) (4) δr = (δx, δy, δz) u i (r + δr, t) u i (r, t) = u i x j δx j (5) δs 2

1 I 1.1 ± e = = - = C C MKSA [m], [Kg] [s] [A] 1C 1A 1 MKSA 1C 1C +q q +q q 1

main.dvi

医系の統計入門第 2 版 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 第 2 版 1 刷発行時のものです.

1: 合計特殊出生率 出生率の推移 暦年 アメリカドイツフランス スウェーデン日本 Apps and Re

(1.2) T D = 0 T = D = 30 kn 1.2 (1.4) 2F W = 0 F = W/2 = 300 kn/2 = 150 kn 1.3 (1.9) R = W 1 + W 2 = = 1100 N. (1.9) W 2 b W 1 a = 0

さくらの個別指導 ( さくら教育研究所 ) 1 φ = φ 1 : φ [ ] a [ ] 1 a : b a b b(a + b) b a 2 a 2 = b(a + b). b 2 ( a b ) 2 = a b a/b X 2 X 1 = 0 a/b > 0 2 a

L Y L( ) Y0.15Y 0.03L 0.01L 6% L=(10.15)Y 108.5Y 6%1 Y y p L ( 19 ) [1990] [1988] 1

01.Œk’ì/“²fi¡*

1 CAPM: I-,,, I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- ( CAPM) I- CAPM I- 1 I- Jensen Fama-French 3 I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 1 Fama-Fr

村本 孜51‐85/51‐85

keisoku01.dvi

Transcription:

01M3065

1 4 1.1........................... 4 1.2........................ 5 1.3........................ 6 2 8 2.1.......................... 8 2.2....................... 9 3 13 3.1............................. 13 3.2............................. 15 3.3............................... 17 3.4............................... 17 3.5....................... 18 4 20 4.1.......................... 20 4.2....................... 21 4.3........................... 23 4.4............................... 24 4.5.................. 31 4.6................................ 32 A 34 1

14 2001 1400 1 2 Diamond 2 1 3 2 2

4 3 3

1 1.1 1) 2015 4 65 1.1 1.1: 12 P.13 1) 4

1.1 1985 65.6 50.0 2000 2001 1985 20.1 14.3 1999 32% 18% 2000 2001 30.1% 16.5% 1987 1988 3% 1999 32.0 18.0 2 10 1.2 1949 5

1950 1953 1988 2003 1 1.3 15 5 20 25 1 50 5% 20% 5% 25 1 50 35% 20% 6

2 20% 6% 26% 5% 20% 2003 5 5.25% 20% 18% 7

2 2.1 Dynasty Model 1928 Ramsey Overlapping Generations Model) 2 Diamond(1965) Diamond Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) Auerbach and Kotlikoff cobb-dagulas Branchard and Fisher (1989) Azariadis(1993) Summers(1981) Chamely and Wright(1987) 8

2.2 Diamond(1965) 1) 2.1 t t +1 t +2 t +1 t +2 t +1 t t +1 t +2 t +3 1 C y,t C o,t+1 2 C y,t+1 C o,t+2 3 C y,t+2 C o,t+3 2.1: w t s t c y,t r t+1 c o,t+1 t c y,t = w t s t (2.1) c o,t+1 = (1+r t+1 )s t (2.2) 1) Diamond(1965) 9

(2.1) (2.2) c y,t + c o,t+1 1+r t+1 = w t (2.3) u t = u(c y,t,c o,t+1 ) (2.4) u t (2.4) (2.3) w t r t+1 u u =(1+r t+1 ) (2.5) c y,t c o,t+1 (2.5) (2.5) (2.1) s t = s(w t,r t+1 ) (2.6) K t L t Y t = F(K t,l t ) (2.7) Y t n L t =(1+n)L t 1 (2.8) (2.7) L t y t = f(k t ) (2.9) 10

y t k t = K t /L t f (k t+1 )=r t+1 (2.10) w t = f(k t ) f (k t )k t (2.11) (2.10) (2.11) (2.10) (2.11) w t r t w(r t ) 2) s t L t = K t+1 s t = 1 1+n k t+1 (2.12) 2 3) steady state (2.6) (2.10) (2.11) (2.12) k t+1 = 1 1+n s[f(k t) f (k t )k t,f (k t+1 )] = φ(k t ) (2.13) (2.13) uniqueness globally Ihori(1996) 4) 2) w(r t ) lim k 0 φ (k t ) > 0 lim f (k t )=0 k φ (k) 0 for all k > 0 3) (2.12) 4) k t+1 = φ(k t ) φ (k) 0 for all k > 0 ds 0 for all (w,r) 0 dr 11

0 <φ < 1 (2.14) 3 4 3 12

3 3.1 c yt+1 c o,t+1 U t (3.1) U t = ( 1 c 1 1/γ y,t + 1 ) 1 1/γ 1+δ c1 1/γ o,t+1 (3.1) (3.1) γ δ 0 <γ<1 δ >0 s t =(1 ω)w t + g (1 + θ t )c y,t (3.2) s t t w t t g ω θ t t (3.2) 13

s t = 1+θ t+1 1+(1 ρ)r t+1 c o,t+1 (3.3) r t+1 t +1 ρ θ t+1 t +1 (3.3) (3.2) (3.3) (1 ω)w t + g =(1+θ t )c y,t + (3.4) t 1+θ t+1 1+(1 ρ)r t+1 c o,t+1 (3.4) (3.4) (3.1) L = 1 1 1/γ +λ ( c 1 1/γ y,t + 1 ) 1+δ c1 1/γ o,t+1 { (1 ω)w t + g (1 + θ t )c y,t (3.5) } 1+θ t+1 c 1+(1 ρ)r o,t+1 t+1 (3.5) L = c 1/γ y,t λ (1 + θ t ) (3.6) c y,t L c o,t+1 = 1 1+δ c 1/γ o,t λ ( 1+θ t+1 1+(1 ρ)r t+1 L λ = (1 ω)w t + g (1 + θ t )c y,t ) (3.7) 1+θ t+1 1+(1 ρ)r t+1 c o,t+1 (3.8) (3.9) (3.6) (3.7) λ λ = c 1/γ y,t 1+θ t (3.10) λ = 1+(1 ρ)r t+1 (1 + θ t+1 )(1 + δ) c o,t+1 (3.11) 14

(3.10) (3.11) ( ) γ ( ) 1+θt 1+(1 γ ρ)rt+1 c o,t+1 = c y,t (3.12) 1+θ t+1 1+δ (3.12) (3.4) c y,t (1 + θ t+1 ) γ 1 (1 + θ t ) 1 (1 + δ) γ {(1 ω)w t + g} c y,t = (1 + θ t+1 ) (γ 1) (1 + δ) γ +(1+θ t ) γ 1 (1 + (1 ρ)r t+1 ) γ 1 (3.13) (3.13) (3.2) s t = {(1 ω)w t + g}(1 + θ t ) γ 1 (1 + δ) γ (1 + θ t+1 ) γ 1 +(1+θ t ) γ 1 {1+(1 ρ)r t+1 } γ 1 (3.14) 3.2 K t L t cobb-douglas α 0 <α<1 Y t = K α t L1 α t (3.15) Π n Π=Y t w t L t r t K t (3.16) L t+1 =(1+n)L t (3.17) (3.15) (3.16) L t (3.15) L t Y t L t = Kα t L t L t L α t (3.18) 15

(3.18) y t = k α t (3.19) y t k t (3.15) f(0) = 0 f ( ) = 0 f (0) = L t (3.16) L t π = y t w t r t k t (3.20) π (3.20) y t w t r r k t (3.21) (3.20) (3.19) k α t w t r t k t = 0 (3.22) (3.22) k t r t = αk α 1 t (3.23) w t = (1 α)k α t (3.24) 16

(3.23) (3.24) 3.3 TR ω ρ c 1,t τ c L t c 2,t τ c L t 1 L t TR = ωw t L t + ρr t K t + θ t c y,t L t + θ t c o,t L t 1 gl t (3.25) (3.25) 1 L t tr = ωw t + ρr t k t + θ t c y,t + θ tc o,t 1+n g (3.26) 3.4 K t+1 = s t L t (3.27) (3.27) t +1 t (3.27) L t 17

k t+1 = 1 1+n s t (3.28) (3.14) (3.23) (3.24) s t = (1 + θ t ) γ 1 {(1 ω)(1 α)kt α + g} (1 + δ) γ (1 + θ γ 1 t+1 +(1+θ t) { γ 1 1+αkt+1 α 1(1 ρ)} γ 1 (3.29) (3.28) (3.29) k t+1 = 1 1+n (1 + θ t ) γ 1 {(1 ω)(1 α)k α t + g} (1 + δ) γ ( 1+θt+1 1+θ t ) γ 1 + { 1+αk α 1 t+1 (1 ρ)} γ 1 (3.30) (3.30) 3.5 (3.30) k t,k t+1 1) (3.30) k t+1 k t t t +1 dk t+1 dk t = (1 + n) 1 α(1 + θ t ) γ 1 (1 α)k α 1 (1 + δ) γ + X γ 1 +(γ 1)X γ 2 (1 ρ)α(α 1)k α 2 (3.31) X =1+(1 ρ)r dk t+1 /dk t 0 1 dk t+1 /dk t dk t+1 /dk t > 0 dk t+1 /dk t < 1 1) 18

4 k ρ dk dρ = (1 + θ t ) γ 1 X γ 1 αk α 1 (1 + δ) γ + X γ 1 +(γ 1)X γ 2 (1 ρ)(α 1)αk α 2 (1 ω)(1 α)αk α 1(3.32) (3.32) dk/dρ < 0 k ω dk dω = (1 + θ t ) γ 1 (1 α)k α (1 + δ) γ + X γ 1 +(γ 1)X γ 2 (1 ρ)(α 1)αk α 2 (1 ω)(1 α)αk α 1(3.33) 4 19

4 4.1 4.1. 4.1: α 0.4 9.0 % δ 1.0 20.0 % γ 0.3 5.0 % g 0.03 n 0.01 α α =0.5 α =0.4 1) δ 1 40 δ =1.0 γ t t +1 1) 11 0.42 20

(2002) 9.0 % g0.03 2) 20.0 % 5.0 % 4.2 4.1 (3.30) k t 0 10 3 k t+1 10 10 0 k t k t+1 4.1: 2) (2002)P.9 21

4.2 E k t k t+1 E k E 0.00001 4.0 4.2: 0.0000100 4.0000000 1 0.0225498 0.4891471 2 0.0843197 0.2298213 5 0.1517757 0.1575057 10 0.1551752 0.1551991 15 0.1551894 0.1551895 20 0.1551895 0.1551895 21 0.1551895 0.1551895 0.1551895 0.1551895 4.2 21 21 22

4.3 ω ρ (3.33) (3.32) 4.2: 4.2 5% 18 3 23

14 3 4.3: 4.3 5% 3 4.4 4.1 4.3 24

4.2 4.3 α α 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.3 α 4.4: (α ) 4.5: (α ) 25

α 4.6: (α ) 4.7: (α ) α cobb-douglas 26

δ δ 4.8: (δ ) 4.9: (δ ) 27

4.10: (δ ) 4.11: (δ ) δ δ 28

γ γ 4.12: (γ ) 4.13: (γ ) γ 29

4.14: (γ ) 4.15: (γ ) γ α δ γ 4.1 30

4.5 0.074 0.03 0.044 CaseA 20% 25% CaseB 20% 15% CaseC 20% 25% CaseD 20% 15% 4.3: CaseA CaseB CaseC CaseD 0.1552 0.1611 0.1495 0.1533 0.1571 1.2233 1.1961 1.2513 1.2326 1.2144 0.2848 0.2891 0.2805 0.2833 0.2862 0.3493 0.3608 0.3382 0.3574 0.3400-37.2165-34.3528-40.3324-35.1730-39.7667 CaseA CaseB CaseA 9.0% 5.5% 39.2% 3.83% 2.23% 1.51% 3.29% 7.69% 31

CaseB 9.0% 12.4% 37.9% 3.69% 2.28% 1.49% 3.18% 8.37% CaseC CaseD CaseC 5.0% 2.9% 42.3% 1.2% 0.76% 0.5% 2.3% 5.5% CaseD 5.0% 7.3% 46.0% 1.23% 0.73% 0.49% 2.67% 6.85% 4.6 Lucas(1990) Lucas 30% (2001) Lucas(1990) 10% 32

Lucas 36% 40 40 33

A (3.30) ( (1 + δ) γ + { 1+αk α 1 t+1 (1 ρ)} γ 1 ) k t+1 =(1+θ t ) γ 1 {(1 ω)(1 α)k α t + g} { (1 + δ) γ + X γ 1 +(γ 1)X γ 2 (1 ρ)(α 1)αk α 2 t+1 } dk t+1 =(1+θ t ) γ 1 (1 ω)(1 α)αkt α 1 dk t dk t dk t+1 dk t = (1 + θ t ) γ 1 (1 ω)(1 α)αk α 1 (1 + δ) γ + X γ 1 +(γ 1)X γ 2 (1 ρ)(α 1)αk α 2 k 0 <dk t+1 /dk t < 1 2 3 34

[1] A.J.Auerbach and L.J.Kotlikoff(1987), Dynamic fiscal policy, Cambridge University Press. [2] C.Azariadis(1993), Intertemporal Macroeconomics, Blackwell. [3] G.T.McCandless,Jr.,and N.Wallace(1991), Introduction to dynamic macroeconomic theory, Harvard University Press. [4] Ch.Chamley and B.Wright(1987), Fiscal Incidence in Overlapping Generations Model with a Fixed Asset, Journal of Public Economics, Vol.32 [5] J.B.Shoven and J.Whalley(1992), Applying General Equilibrium, Cambridge University Press. [6] L.H.Summers(1981), Capital Taxation and Accumulation in a Life Cycle Growth Model, The American Economic Review, Vol. 71(4) [7] O.J.Branchard and S.Fischer(1989),Lectures on Macroeconomics, MIT Press. [8] P.A.Diamond(1965), National dept in a neoclassical growth model, The American Economic Reviwe, Vol. 55(5) [9] R.Lucas,Jr(1990), Supply-side economics: An analytical review,oxford Economic papers,vol.42,no.2. [10] T.Ihori(1996), Public Finance in an Overlapping Generation Economy, Macmillan Press. [11] (1991),,. 35

[12] (2002), 14,. [13] (1996),,. [14] (1989),,. [15] (2001),,, Vol.52,No.1. [16] (2002), 14,. [17] (2001), 11,. [18] (1994), - -. [19] (1998),,. [20] (2002), 52 1. [21] (1987,,. 36