Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C"

Transcription

1 Jorgenson Tobin q : Hayashi s Theorem Jordan Saddle Path. GDP % GDP Tobin q 2 2.

2 Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? CES Y = A a b ψ + a bl ψ /ψ 6 < a, b <, ψ < / ψ ψ Y = Const a L a CES Inada CES F = A a b ψ + a bl ψ ψ/ψ ψ ab b 7 < ψ < lim F > lim F = ψ < lim F = lim F < CES Inada lim k F k = * * CES Translog CES, L, Y PC missing variables 2

3 2.2 Jorgenson *2 r Y w Minimize wl + r 8 s.t.f, L = Y 9,F, L = A a L a = ay /r r? I d dt Jorgenson 963 t = t λ 2 λ < λ < t t λ ln ln = λ ln t ln 3 λ t *2 Tobin q 984 3

4 Time to build 2.3 Tobin q Tobin Jorgenson Tobin q q + q = 4 q *3 q q *4 q q + q = 5 *5 *3 *4 irreversible investment irreversibility Dixit and Pindyck BOJ Working Paper6-J-9 *5 q 4

5 q q *6 q q q Tobin q Tobin q 3 Jorgenson Tobin q irreversibility *

6 *7 * r = + r 6 r/2 = + r t lim n + r n nt 8 + r nt = n + r n nt 9 m = n r 2 *9 + r nt = + m rt 2 n m *7 Perko 99 *8 *9 r 6

7 lim n + r n nt = lim + m rt 22 m m e e lim + m 23 m m t lim n + r n nt = e rt 24 r r rt t t s= r s ds 25 [ e R t ] t s= rsds = exp r s ds s= 26 r t s= r s ds = rt t π I t It φ I t 28 t It π I t φ I t 29 π >, π < I t φ > 3 φ = 3 7

8 2φ It + φ > 32 lim x xφ x = 33 Romer24 Lucas Uzawa 3..4 t I t I t = + 34? r t 8

9 + r t+ r t 2 [ It π I t φ I t + π + I t+ φ + r t+ It+ + I t+ ] 35 2 s [ ] It+s π +s I t+s φ I t+s + r t+m +s s= m= 36 s= s [ ] It+s π +s I t+s φ I t+s + r +s 37 I t = + for all t 38 2 Policy Function Max s= s [ ] It+s π +s I t+s φ I t+s + r +s 39 s.t. I t = + for all t 4 λ t L = s= s [ ] It+s π +s I t+s φ I t+s + r +s q + λ t+s I t+s +s+ + +s 4 s= q t+s = + r s λ t 42 L = s= s [ ] It+s π +s I t+s φ I t+s + q t+s I t+s +s+ + +s + r +s 43 9

10 s= I t φ I t φ + q t = 44 q t = + φ + I t φ 45 q q t+ = q t+ q t 2 π + It+ + φ + q t+ + r q t = π + It+ + φ = rq t+ q t+ r q t * t+ t+ q t q t+ > q t+ q T T T+ T q T q T T = 48 + r t lim q t = 49 t + r Transversality Condition * * * Arrow and urz97

11 3..5 s= s [ ] It+s π +s I t+s φ I t+s + r +s 5 e e π rt It I t φ I t dt 5 t= d dt = I t 52 * 2 It H = π I t φ I t + q t I t 53 q t = + φ + I t φ 54 q t rq t = H 55 2 π It + φ = rq t q 56 t lim t e rt q t = 57 *2 995

12 3..6 T e π rt It I t φ I t dt 58 d dt = I t 59 L = T T e rt T e π rt It I t φ I t dt + e rt q t I t t dt + λ T e rt q t λ I t t t T e rt q t dt = [ e rt ] T T q t e rt q t t dt = e rt q T T q T e rt q t t dt L = L = T + q + T e π rt It I t φ T e rt q t t dt + λ T e rt e rt π I t φ It + λ T e rt e rt q T T + q π + It T I t dt + e rt q t I t dt e rt q T T I t + q t I t rq t q t dt 2 φ rq t q t = 2 rq t q t = π It + φ 2

13 I t φ I t φ + q t = 3..7 Tobin Q φ I/ I/ q t = + φ + I t φ 6 2φ + It φ 6 I/ q I t = h q t, h >, h = 62 q q q I/ q h q I/ q q Tobin q I/ q q q I/ q I/ q q Tobin q q q q 982 q q q q 2 F,L 3

14 q t = rq t F 2 It φ 63 q t = q t + t q t 64 2 It = φ 65 rq F + I + φ + I t φ 66 = rq + I + φ F, L + wl 67 t cashflow = π t = F, L I + φ wl 68 q t = rq π t 69 x t = q t x t = rx t π t 7 rx t e rt xt rx t e rt = e rt π t 7 de rt x t dt = e rt π t 72 t= de rt x t dt = e rt π t dt 73 dt t= lim t e rt x t x = e rt π t dt 74 t= q = t= e rt π t dt 75 q = t= e rt π t dt 76 Tobin q q q q q 4

15 982 q q q * 3 4 = h q t 77 2 q t = rq t π It φ 78 lim t e rt q t = h q t > q t > 8 q q 2 q t > rq t > π It + φ 8 q q q q t = = q q = q= q q q t = q *3 q q q 5

16 saddle path 4. 2 f, g = f, q 82 q, Taylor q t = g, q 83 = f q, + f k q, + fq q, q q 84 q = g q, + g k q, + gq q, q q 85 q, q fk q, = g k q, f q q, g q q, q q 86 =, q = h q = r = π, q =, φ + φ + I φ = 2φ q = 2φ π r q q λ, λ 2 P, P 2 P = P, P 2 * 4 2φ λ π = P P 88 r λ 2 87 q λ = P λ 2 P q q 89 *

17 P q λ = λ 2 P q q 9 z z 2 P q q 9 z z 2 = P q 92 z z 2 λ = λ 2 z z 2 93 z t = e λt z 94 z 2t = e λ 2t z 2 95 P P P = 2 P 2 P = P e λt z + P 2 e λ2t z 2 97 q t q = P 2 e λt z + P 22 e λ2t z 2 98 λ, λ 2 q P z q λ < < λ 2 P 2 z 2 P 22 z 2 z 2 = P q q 2 = 99 q saddle path saddle P P P = 2 P 2 P 22 saddle path P 2 + P 22 q q = 7

18 λ λ 2 = π 2φ < saddle * 5 saddle saddle saddle saddle saddle q?q 78 q saddle path saddle path saddle? 4.2 saddle path π 2 q t = q? q q q q q saddle path q q 5 Adda and Copper23 *5 8

19 q Hayashi, F., Tobin s Marginal q and Average q: A Neoclassical Interpretation, Econometrica, 5, January, 982. Hyashi & Inoue Hayashi, F., and T. Inoue, The Relation between Firm Growth and Q with Multiple Captial Goods: Theory and Evidence from Panel Data on Japanese Firms, Econometrica, 59, 3, 99. Tobin q Hoshi, T., A. ashayp and D. Sharfstein, Corporate Structure, Liquidity and Investment: Evidence from Japanese Industrial Groups, Quarterly Journal of Economics, February, 99. irreversible investment Dixit, A., and R. Pindyck, 994 Investment under Uncertaintiy, Princeton, NJ: Princenton University Press. Cabellero Handbook of Macroeconomics Caballero, R.J., 999, Aggergate Investment, in Taylor and Woodford ed, Handbook of Macroeconomics, B, North-Holland. Perko, L., 99 Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, Springer-Verlag Arrow,.J., and M. urz, 97, Public Investment, the Rate of Return, and Optimal Fiscal Policy, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press. appendix Barro, J.R., and X. Sala-I-Martin., 995 Economic Growth, New York; NY, McGraw Hill. 9

20 q q = = 2 q q = = q q = =

Keynes 1936 Tobin 1 Hicks 1937 Keynes IS LM 2 IS LM 3 IS LM Keynes Keynes animal spirits

Keynes 1936 Tobin 1 Hicks 1937 Keynes IS LM 2 IS LM 3 IS LM Keynes Keynes animal spirits 43 2000 17 28 Masahiro NAKANO 2.1 Keynes 2.2 3.1 3.2 43 2000 Keynes 1936 Tobin 1 Hicks 1937 Keynes IS LM 2 IS LM 3 IS LM Keynes Keynes animal spirits Keynes IS LM 1990 Keynes 1980 90 2 1 43 2000 Keynes

More information

aragciv54mac.dvi

aragciv54mac.dvi 2013 3 25 ( 4 ) Modigliani-Miller(1963) 1 1 1 IRR ( ) NPV IRR NPV IRR NPV IRR 100 EBIT 20 20% τ (1 τ) 20% CC tax = S V ρ S + B V (1 τ)ρ B (1) S B V ρ S CAPM 1 ρ B *1 (1) MM *2 ( ) MM MM ( ) MM (1 τ) 20%

More information

shuron.dvi

shuron.dvi 01M3065 1 4 1.1........................... 4 1.2........................ 5 1.3........................ 6 2 8 2.1.......................... 8 2.2....................... 9 3 13 3.1.............................

More information

【表紙】経済学論叢_18号/表1・3・背

【表紙】経済学論叢_18号/表1・3・背 Blanchard Solow Solow Galor and Tsiddon ,, , ,, ,,,,,, a if b c if if CES CES,,,,,,. Bowles Ciccone and Peri, .,, Bowles Hamermesh Antras Ciccone and Peri CES CES Krusell et al. Duffy et al. Hornstein

More information

Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) ,

Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) , ,, 2010 8 24 2010 9 14 A B C A (B Negishi(1960) (C) ( 22 3 27 ) E-mail:[email protected] E-mail:[email protected] E-mail:[email protected] 1 1 1 2 3 Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987)

More information

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察 1998 1999 1998 1999 10 10 1999 30 (1982, 1996) (1997) (1977) (1990) (1996) (1997) (1996) Ihori, Doi, and Kondo (1999) (1982) (1984) (1987) (1993) (1997) (1998) CAPM 1980 (time inconsistency) Persson, Persson

More information

(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008)

(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008) ,, 23 4 30 (i) (ii) (i) (ii) Negishi (1960) 2010 (2010) ( ) ( ) (2010) E-mail:[email protected] E-mail:[email protected] E-mail:[email protected] 1 1 16 (2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987)

More information

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003 266 Vol. 44 No. 3 I 序論 Mirrlees 1971 Diamond 1998 Saez 2002 Kaplow 2008 1 700 900 1, 300 1, 700 II III IV V II わが国の再分配の状況と国際比較 OECD Forster and Mira d Ercole 2005 2006 2001 Winter 08 267 図 1 図 2 2000 2

More information

Masahiro NAKANO Keynes benchmark Keynes 89

Masahiro NAKANO Keynes benchmark Keynes 89 89 102 Masahiro NAKANO Keynes benchmark Keynes 89 ( )IS LM Keynes Hicks IS LM Phillips stylized fact ( ) ( ) 90 Keynes 3 superneutrality 4 RBC 2 1 (i) (ii) (a) (b) (c) 3 Keynes 91 Walras Keynes Say s law

More information

1. R n Ω ε G ε 0 Ω ε B n 2 Ωε = with Bu = 0 on Ω ε i=1 x 2 i ε +0 B Bu = u (Dirichlet, D Ω ε ), Bu = u ν (Neumann, N Ω ε ), Ω ε G ( ) / 25

1. R n Ω ε G ε 0 Ω ε B n 2 Ωε = with Bu = 0 on Ω ε i=1 x 2 i ε +0 B Bu = u (Dirichlet, D Ω ε ), Bu = u ν (Neumann, N Ω ε ), Ω ε G ( ) / 25 .. IV 2012 10 4 ( ) 2012 10 4 1 / 25 1. R n Ω ε G ε 0 Ω ε B n 2 Ωε = with Bu = 0 on Ω ε i=1 x 2 i ε +0 B Bu = u (Dirichlet, D Ω ε ), Bu = u ν (Neumann, N Ω ε ), Ω ε G ( ) 2012 10 4 2 / 25 1. Ω ε B ε t

More information

中京大学経済学論叢 23 号 2012 年 3 月 審査論文 1 Keywords: JEL Classi cation: L13, L22, L33 1 * *1 Inoue, Kamijo, and Tomaru (2009) Mukherjee and Suestrong

中京大学経済学論叢 23 号 2012 年 3 月 審査論文 1 Keywords: JEL Classi cation: L13, L22, L33 1 * *1 Inoue, Kamijo, and Tomaru (2009) Mukherjee and Suestrong 中京大学経済学論叢 23 号 22 年 3 月 審査論文 Keywords: JEL Classication: L3, L22, L33 * 2373253 * Inoue, Kamijo, and Tomaru (29)Mukherjee and Suestrong (29) Long and Stähler (29)Gil-Molto, Poyago-Theotoky, and Zikos (2)Matsumura

More information

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL   Right Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): 54-76 Issue Date 1996-07 URL https://doi.org/10.14989/45083 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher

More information

Constitution State colonies Provisions State Nutmeg State Land of Steady Habits Quinnehtukqut Quinnihtukqut Nautilus American Turtle Yankee Omi Omi Shonin Edo The Theory of Environmental Policy A Listing

More information

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察 000 364 645 (ax smoohing (Barro(979 Barro(979 (consumpion smoohing Hall(978 Campbell(987 Barro(979 Hall(978 Campbell(987 Campbell(987 B ( r B G T ( ( r E B G T Y T/Y r ( No Ponzi Game ( [ Ω ] Y ( lim (

More information

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─ q E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] OECD Vives Tirole Shleifer and Vishny q %% %% % % Allen and Gale %% % Admati, Pfreiderer and Zechner Burkart, Gromb and Panunzi Cremer 1995Pagno

More information

時間割引:双曲割引と弱加法性

時間割引:双曲割引と弱加法性 Discussion aper No. 666 June 2006 The Institute of Social and Economic Research Osaka University 6-1 Mihogaoka, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047, Japan Time Discounting: Declining Impatience and Interval Effect

More information

meiji_resume_1.PDF

meiji_resume_1.PDF β β β (q 1,q,..., q n ; p 1, p,..., p n ) H(q 1,q,..., q n ; p 1, p,..., p n ) Hψ = εψ ε k = k +1/ ε k = k(k 1) (x, y, z; p x, p y, p z ) (r; p r ), (θ; p θ ), (ϕ; p ϕ ) ε k = 1/ k p i dq i E total = E

More information

DGE DGE 2 2 1 1990 1 1 3 (1) ( 1

DGE DGE 2 2 1 1990 1 1 3 (1) ( 1 早 稲 田 大 学 現 代 政 治 経 済 研 究 所 ゼロ 金 利 下 で 量 的 緩 和 政 策 は 有 効 か? -ニューケインジアンDGEモデルによる 信 用 創 造 の 罠 の 分 析 - 井 上 智 洋 品 川 俊 介 都 築 栄 司 上 浦 基 No.J1403 Working Paper Series Institute for Research in Contemporary Political

More information

アロー『やってみて学習』から学習:経済成長にとっての教訓 Learning from `Learning by Doing': Lessons for Economic Growth

アロー『やってみて学習』から学習:経済成長にとっての教訓 Learning from `Learning by Doing': Lessons for Economic Growth Learning from Learning by Doing : Lessons for Economic Growth M *1 * 2 1997 2004 10 1-2013 12 29 Version1.0 2014 3 2 *1 c 2010 MIT *2 c 2004-2013 i 1993 40 MIT 1991 ii R.M.S. * 1 *1 iii i 1 1 2 15 3 27

More information

I ( ) 1 de Broglie 1 (de Broglie) p λ k h Planck ( Js) p = h λ = k (1) h 2π : Dirac k B Boltzmann ( J/K) T U = 3 2 k BT

I ( ) 1 de Broglie 1 (de Broglie) p λ k h Planck ( Js) p = h λ = k (1) h 2π : Dirac k B Boltzmann ( J/K) T U = 3 2 k BT I (008 4 0 de Broglie (de Broglie p λ k h Planck ( 6.63 0 34 Js p = h λ = k ( h π : Dirac k B Boltzmann (.38 0 3 J/K T U = 3 k BT ( = λ m k B T h m = 0.067m 0 m 0 = 9. 0 3 kg GaAs( a T = 300 K 3 fg 07345

More information

濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G

濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G 濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G34 950-2181 2 8050 Tel. and fax: 025-262-6538 E-mail: [email protected]

More information

sakigake1.dvi

sakigake1.dvi (Zin ARAI) [email protected] http://www.cris.hokudai.ac.jp/arai/ 1 dynamical systems ( mechanics ) dynamical systems 3 G X Ψ:G X X, (g, x) Ψ(g, x) =:Ψ g (x) Ψ id (x) =x, Ψ gh (x) =Ψ h (Ψ g (x)) (

More information

2015 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1

2015 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1 2015 : 27 6 13 1 (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1947) 2 Samuelson(1958) 3 OLG Solow Ramsey Samuelson

More information

ú r(ú) t n [;t] [;t=n]; (t=n; 2t=n]; (2t=n; 3t=n];:::; ((nä 1)t=n;t] n t 1 (nä1)t=n e Är(t)=n (nä 2)t=n e Är(t)=n e Är((nÄ1)t=n)=n t e Är(t)=n e Är((n

ú r(ú) t n [;t] [;t=n]; (t=n; 2t=n]; (2t=n; 3t=n];:::; ((nä 1)t=n;t] n t 1 (nä1)t=n e Är(t)=n (nä 2)t=n e Är(t)=n e Är((nÄ1)t=n)=n t e Är(t)=n e Är((n 1 1.1 ( ) ö t 1 (1 +ö) Ä1 2 (1 +ö=2) Ä2 ö=2 n (1 +ö=n) Än n t (1 +ö=n) Änt t nt n t lim (1 n!1 +ö=n)änt = n!1 lim 2 4 1 + 1 n=ö! n=ö 3 5 Äöt = î lim s!1 í 1 + 1 ì s ï Äöt =e Äöt s e eëlim s!1 (1 + 1=s)

More information

曲面のパラメタ表示と接線ベクトル

曲面のパラメタ表示と接線ベクトル L11(2011-07-06 Wed) :Time-stamp: 2011-07-06 Wed 13:08 JST hig 1,,. 2. http://hig3.net () (L11) 2011-07-06 Wed 1 / 18 ( ) 1 V = (xy2 ) x + (2y) y = y 2 + 2. 2 V = 4y., D V ds = 2 2 ( ) 4 x 2 4y dy dx =

More information

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程 1991 2003 GDP....................................... http://www.stat.go.jp/ http://www.boj.or.jp/ GDP http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/ GDP - - - inflation targeting Krugman a IS-LM liquidity trap Krugman b Krugman

More information

untitled

untitled 2007 2 * (i) (ii) 2006 7 1999 2 2000 8 1 (2003) Oda and Ueda (2005) 2005 Kimura and Small(2006) Iwamura, Shiratsuka and Watanabe (2006) (2006) 3 (i) (ii) (iii) 2 2 3 4 2.1 (2003) (2005) 1) (i) (ii) (i)

More information

bottleneckjapanese.dvi

bottleneckjapanese.dvi 1 M&A Keywords:,. Address: 742-1, Higashinakano, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo 192-09,Japan fax:+81 426 74 425 E-mail: [email protected] ; [email protected] 1 Yang and Kawashima(2008) 1 2 ( MVI

More information

2 / 24

2 / 24 2017 11 9 1 / 24 2 / 24 Solow, 1957 total factor productivity; TFP 5% 経済成長率の要因分解 4% 3% 2.68% 2.51% 2% 1% 0% 1.63% 1.50% 0.34% 0.42% 0.55% 0.97% 1.14% 0.86% 0.13% -0.59% -0.59% -0.09% 0.01% -1% 1970-80

More information

LA-VAR Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2)

LA-VAR Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2) LA-VAR 1 1 1973 4 2000 4 Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2) E-mail [email protected] 2 Toda, Hiro Y. and Yamamoto,T.(1995) 3

More information

Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC

Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC 90 ª ª * [email protected] i ii iii iv SNA 1 70 80 2 80 90 80 80 90 1 80 90 98 6 1 1 SNA 2 1 SNA 80 1SNA 1 19931998 1 2-190 1,2 2 2-2 2-3,4 3 2-5 4 2030 2-3 3 2-15 97 20 90 2-15 9198 1.

More information

() x + y + y + x dy dx = 0 () dy + xy = x dx y + x y ( 5) ( s55906) 0.7. (). 5 (). ( 6) ( s6590) 0.8 m n. 0.9 n n A. ( 6) ( s6590) f A (λ) = det(a λi)

() x + y + y + x dy dx = 0 () dy + xy = x dx y + x y ( 5) ( s55906) 0.7. (). 5 (). ( 6) ( s6590) 0.8 m n. 0.9 n n A. ( 6) ( s6590) f A (λ) = det(a λi) 0. A A = 4 IC () det A () A () x + y + z = x y z X Y Z = A x y z ( 5) ( s5590) 0. a + b + c b c () a a + b + c c a b a + b + c 0 a b c () a 0 c b b c 0 a c b a 0 0. A A = 7 5 4 5 0 ( 5) ( s5590) () A ()

More information

PFI

PFI PFI 23 3 3 PFI PFI 1 1 2 3 2.1................................. 3 2.2..................... 4 2.3.......................... 5 3 7 3.1................................ 7 3.2.................................

More information

2 1 κ c(t) = (x(t), y(t)) ( ) det(c (t), c x (t)) = det (t) x (t) y (t) y = x (t)y (t) x (t)y (t), (t) c (t) = (x (t)) 2 + (y (t)) 2. c (t) =

2 1 κ c(t) = (x(t), y(t)) ( ) det(c (t), c x (t)) = det (t) x (t) y (t) y = x (t)y (t) x (t)y (t), (t) c (t) = (x (t)) 2 + (y (t)) 2. c (t) = 1 1 1.1 I R 1.1.1 c : I R 2 (i) c C (ii) t I c (t) (0, 0) c (t) c(i) c c(t) 1.1.2 (1) (2) (3) (1) r > 0 c : R R 2 : t (r cos t, r sin t) (2) C f : I R c : I R 2 : t (t, f(t)) (3) y = x c : R R 2 : t (t,

More information

N/m f x x L dl U 1 du = T ds pdv + fdl (2.1)

N/m f x x L dl U 1 du = T ds pdv + fdl (2.1) 23 2 2.1 10 5 6 N/m 2 2.1.1 f x x L dl U 1 du = T ds pdv + fdl (2.1) 24 2 dv = 0 dl ( ) U f = T L p,t ( ) S L p,t (2.2) 2 ( ) ( ) S f = L T p,t p,l (2.3) ( ) U f = L p,t + T ( ) f T p,l (2.4) 1 f e ( U/

More information

GDPギャップと潜在成長率

GDPギャップと潜在成長率 2003 output gap 80 1 20 90 20 70 2 1 2 output gap potential output 1 2 (2001) 3 potential rate of growth 2000 Meyer (2000) European Central Bank: (1999b) 2002 10 4 3 (2000) 4 4 () 5 5 5 6 () () 7 Total

More information

SO(3) 7 = = 1 ( r ) + 1 r r r r ( l ) (5.17) l = 1 ( sin θ ) + sin θ θ θ ϕ (5.18) χ(r)ψ(θ, ϕ) l ψ = αψ (5.19) l 1 = i(sin ϕ θ l = i( cos ϕ θ l 3 = i ϕ

SO(3) 7 = = 1 ( r ) + 1 r r r r ( l ) (5.17) l = 1 ( sin θ ) + sin θ θ θ ϕ (5.18) χ(r)ψ(θ, ϕ) l ψ = αψ (5.19) l 1 = i(sin ϕ θ l = i( cos ϕ θ l 3 = i ϕ SO(3) 71 5.7 5.7.1 1 ħ L k l k l k = iϵ kij x i j (5.117) l k SO(3) l z l ± = l 1 ± il = i(y z z y ) ± (z x x z ) = ( x iy) z ± z( x ± i y ) = X ± z ± z (5.118) l z = i(x y y x ) = 1 [(x + iy)( x i y )

More information

1970). Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C. and R. D. Willig (1982); Contestable Markets and The Theory of Industry Structure, 1982. Caves, R. and M. E. Porter (1977); From entry barriers to mobility barriers:

More information