udc-3.dvi

Similar documents
05_藤田先生_責

udc-4.dvi

The Japanese Journal of Health Psychology, 29(S): (2017)





02[ ]小山・池田(責)岩.indd

NODERA, K.*, TANAKA, Y.**, RAFAEL, F.*** and MIYAZAKI, Y.**** : Relationship between rate of success and distance of shooting on fade-away shoot in fe

A pp CALL College Life CD-ROM Development of CD-ROM English Teaching Materials, College Life Series, for Improving English Communica

OJT Planned Happenstance

Human Welfare 8‐1☆/4.坂口

先端社会研究 ★5★号/4.山崎


Web Stamps 96 KJ Stamps Web Vol 8, No 1, 2004

06_学術.indd

Elmore & Pohlmann Greenwood & Ramagli a b c a b c

A B C B C ICT ICT ITC ICT

Ⅱ. 用語の操作的定義 Ⅲ. 対象と方法 1. 対象 WAM NET 2. 調査期間 : 3. 調査方法 4. 調査内容 5. 分析方法 FisherMann-Whitney U Kruskal-Wallis SPSS. for Windows 6. 倫理的配慮 Vol. No.

THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY 2007, Vol. 15 No. 2, 217–227

<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>

理学療法検査技術習得に向けた客観的臨床能力試験(OSCE)の試行



02石出猛史.indd



26 1 : Self - reported Practices of Cancer Pain Management among Nurses in Tohoku University Hospital Hideyuki Hira

220 28;29) 30 35) 26;27) % 8.0% 9 36) 8) 14) 37) O O 13 2 E S % % 2 6 1fl 2fl 3fl 3 4

0701073‐立命‐社会システム15号/15‐9-招待-横井


Yogo

表紙PDF作成用/PDF表紙作成用

<30315F985F95B65F90B490852E696E6464>

08医療情報学22_1_水流final.PDF

Kyushu Communication Studies 第2号

2 10 The Bulletin of Meiji University of Integrative Medicine 1,2 II 1 Web PubMed elbow pain baseball elbow little leaguer s elbow acupun

The Journal of the Japan Academy of Nursing Administration and Policies Vol 12, No 1, pp 49 59, 2008 資料 看護師におけるメンタリングとキャリア結果の関連 Relationship between M

100 SDAM SDAM Windows2000/XP 4) SDAM TIN ESDA K G G GWR SDAM GUI

ABSTRACT

表紙PDF作成用/PDF表紙作成用


1 Fig. 1 Extraction of motion,.,,, 4,,, 3., 1, 2. 2.,. CHLAC,. 2.1,. (256 ).,., CHLAC. CHLAC, HLAC. 2.3 (HLAC ) r,.,. HLAC. N. 2 HLAC Fig. 2

2 R K/S K/S K/S K/S K/S K/S K/SR R K/S K/S K/S K S R K/S K/S K/S K/S K/S K/S

A 18 B 6 AB p >0.05 A1A2B1B2 A3B3 t p > ο =0 1 =12 =2 0 ο14 10=0ο= ο144 0 ο4041ο64 65ο144 WAIS R Wilcoxon

untitled

Table 1 Characteristics of the study participants in Imari municipal hospital

GP ICT GP GP GP reading writing listening speaking GP ICT ICT

Soc. Env. Sci., Jpn. 31(1): (2018)


Core Ethics Vol.

_念3)医療2009_夏.indd

06_学術_関節単純X線画像における_1c_梅木様.indd

Appropriate Disaster Preparedness Education in Classrooms According to Students Grade, from Kindergarten through High School Contrivance of an Educati

00.\...ec5


女子短大生に対する栄養マネジメント教育とその評価

Japan J. Phys. Educ. Hlth. Sport Sci. 54(1): (2009)

Yamagata Journal of Health Sciences, Vol. 16, 2013 Tamio KEITOKU 1 2 Katsuko TANNO 3 Kiyoko ARIMA 4 Noboru CHIBA 1 Abstract The present study aimed to

/toushin/.htm GP GP GP GP GP p.

16_.....E...._.I.v2006

明海大学歯学雑誌 37‐2/1.秦泉寺

< A796BD8AD991E58A77976C2D8CBE8CEA C B B835E2E706466>

Vol. No. Honda, et al.,

橡LET.PDF



表紙PDF作成用/PDF表紙作成用

56 pp , 2005 * ******* *** ** CA CAMA

202

市区町村別平均寿命の全国順位の変化からみた青森県市町村平均寿命の解析

Fig. 3 Flow diagram of image processing. Black rectangle in the photo indicates the processing area (128 x 32 pixels).

_原著03_濱田_責.indd

untitled


Transcription:

49 UDC 371.279.1 3 4 753 1 2 2 1 2 47 6 2005 11 14

50 No.35, 2006 1 1.1 AO 2003 2004 2005 2005 1 1 2005 1998 1999 2002 12 11 2000 SAT ACT Law School Admission Test LSAT Medical College Admission Test MCAT Graduate Australian Medical Schools Admissions Test GAMSAT Undergraduate Medicine & Health Sciences Admission Test UMAT Test for Medical Studies TMS 2002 15 4 1.2

51 1998 1999 2005 2000 1998 1999 2 16 3 6 80 2005 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 15 2 2.1 2005 10 1 3

52 No.35, 2006 1 2005 2 2.2 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

53 8. speeded test 2.3 2 1 2 1 6 5 10 800 A4 1 3 multiplechoice 4 10 EMI extended matching items 10 4 6 2.4 15 16 1 2 4 2 17 1 2005 4 3 36 1 17 5 3 3.1 17 5 43 3 4 787 3 4

54 No.35, 2006 2 1 2 6 7 1 14 15 3.2 2 1 35 12 100 50 2 35 15 80 50 1 GAMSAT 2 GAMSAT UMAT 50% 50 5 60 100 1983 7 Part-A Part-B Part-C 47 Part-D Part-E Part-F Part-G Part-C 47 47 4 3.3 787 753 96% 2 59%

55 37% 4% 39% 30% 62% 38% 4 753 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 Part-1 Part-2 English 1 2 P1+P2 4.1 Part-1 Part-2 35 2 3 1 50 English 100 3 2.3 3 4 60% Part-1 Part-2 50 30 60% English P1+P2 100 60 60% Part-1 27 60% Part-1 English Part-2 3 1 1 1 Part-2 English Part-1 P1+P2 Part-1 3 2 1 2 Part-1 Part-2 Part-1 Part-2 Part-1 Part-2 2 Part-1 English Part-2

56 No.35, 2006 3 1 2 Part-1 Part-2 P1+P2 Part-1 Part-2 English 3 Part-1 Part-2 P1+P2 Part-1 Part-2 Part-1 Part-2

57 Part-1 Part-2 English P1+P2 1 Part-1 Part-2 English P1+P2 2 1 English Part-1 Part-2 Part-1 Part-2 2 P1+P2 Part-1 Part-2 4 P1+P2 Part-1 6 Part-2 4 5 1 1 0 0/1 English 0.845 English 50

58 No.35, 2006 1 Part-1 2 Part-2 3 English 2 4 P1+P2 0.127 Part-1 0.761 0.10 English 15 50 Spearman- Brown 0.820 0/1 0.850 Part-2 0.568 0.04 Part-2 0.6 0.7 15 50 Spearman-Brown 0.653 0/1 0.661 Part-2 6 Part-1 Part-2 English

59 1 Part-1 2 Part-2 3 English 3 4 P1+P2 Part-1 Part-2 Part-1 Part-2 Part-1 Part2 0.460 0.5 English Part-1 English Part-2 English 0.475 0.486 4 4 6 Part-1 Part-2 English Part-2 Part-1 Part-2

60 No.35, 2006 5 6 2004 Part-1 Part-2 English P1+P2 5 Part-2 4.2 Part-1 Part-2 6 2.3 4 Part-1 Part-2 7 5 5 7 1 Part-1 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% H HM M LM L 7 2 Part-2 6 Part-1 Part-2 Part-1 Part-2 Part-1 Part-2

61 0.940 0.701 Part-1 Part-1 0.713 0.548 Part-2 Part-2 0.943 0.866 English English 0.905 0.709 P1+P2 P1+P2 5

62 No.35, 2006 1 Part-1 2 Part-2 6 8 1 Part-1 8 2 Part-2 F Part-1 Part-2 Part-1 20%

63 1 Part-1 2 Part-2 7 5 6 5 1 6 Part-2 10% 6 Part-1 12 1 14 1 5 1 7

64 No.35, 2006 1 Part-1 2 Part-2 8 Part-1 Part-2 0.1 1 Part-1 0.342 Part-2 0.248 Part-1 Part-2 6 4 Part-1 Part-2 English Part-1 Part-2 English 8 3 P1 P2 E Part-1 Part-2 English 1 English 2

65 7 8 3

66 No.35, 2006 9 3 3 Part-1 Part-2 Part-2 Part-1 English 4 3 Part-2 English 9 4 Part-2 Part-1 English 0.539 3 4.3 Part-1 Part-2 3.2 47 47 47 10 47 6 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 11 1% Part-1 Part-1 Part-1 Part-2 Part-2 Part-2 Part-2 Part-2 Part-2 Part-2 4.4 Part-2

67 10 47 6 2006 2 5 7 8 13 3 2 4

68 No.35, 2006 11 6 7 8 13 5 43 3 4 753 Part-1 Part-2 2 English Part-1 Part-2 60% Part-1 Part-2 Part-1 Part-2 English Part-1 Part-2 2006 Part-1 Part-2 Part-1 Part-2 0.460 Part-1 Part-2 47 6 Part-1

69 0.363 Part-2 0.221 1% 3 (2006). 35 19 47 (2003). (2004). (2000). (2002). (2005). 34 89 120 (1983). 1 No.2 54 61 (2005). 34 1 17 (2006). No.16, 149 155 (2005). RN-04-26 (2006). No.16, 133 139 (2000). No.22, 50 56 (1998). (1999). (2002). B (2004). 2005

70 No.35, 2006 1 2 3 1

71

72 No.35, 2006

73

74 No.35, 2006

75

76 No.35, 2006

77

78 No.35, 2006

79

80 No.35, 2006

81

82 No.35, 2006

83

84 No.35, 2006

85

86 No.35, 2006

87

88 No.35, 2006

89

90 No.35, 2006

91

92 No.35, 2006

93

94 No.35, 2006

95

96 No.35, 2006

97

98 No.35, 2006

99

100 No.35, 2006

101

102 No.35, 2006

103

104 No.35, 2006

105

106 No.35, 2006

Development and evaluation of non-curriculum-based ability test 107 Development and evaluation of non-curriculum-based ability test for medical course admissions from university graduates ITO Kei HAYASHI Atsuhiro SHIINA Kumiko OSAWA Koichi ISHII Hidetoki YANAI Haruo TAGURI Masaaki IWATSUBO Shuichi AKANE Atsushi ASO Takeshi IWAHORI Jun-ichiro UCHIDA Chiyoko KAWASAKI Masaru SAITO Nobuhiko TAKEDA Ryuji Abstract A non-curriculum-based ability test for medical course admissions was developed to measure the abilities required for medical courses. To evaluate the items developed in our test, we conducted a trial test and distributed questionnaires to 753 volunteers comprised of third and fourth year university students from the faculties of liberal arts, science, and medicine. The test consists of two parts. The first part (Part-1) measures logical thinking and information apprehension abilities. The second part (Part-2) measures communicative competence, reading comprehension ability, and related abilities. Analysis of the test data showed that the test was designed with the appropriate level of difficulty. In addition, it was shown that Part-1 and Part-2 were not highly correlated; thus, we concluded that these two parts measured different abilities. Research Division, National Center for University Entrance Examinations Graduate School of Education, University of Tokyo School of Human Sciences, Waseda University Department of Legal Medicine, Kansai University Tokyo Medical and Dental University Kochi Medical School University Health Center, Ibaraki University Medical Education Center, Yamaguchi University St. Marianna University Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University

108 No.35, 2006 Factor analysis of the 47 items included in the questionnaire yielded six factors reflecting different aspects of abilities. Three of the six factors significantly correlated with Part-1 and Part-2. These results imply that the test items in both parts measure the intended abilities, such as logical thinking abilities, reading comprehension and related abilities, except for communicative competence. Key words: non-curriculum-based ability test, logical thinking ability, communicative competence