1 20 I II III 1 2 3 4 IV I Makiko Noto / 1 1933 8 2 2004 16 3 1 1963 101 118 11 1965 291 332 2 4 1985 247 262 3 446 2 3 465 2 465 5 2004 16= 2005 2005 004 2012 summer / No.392
3 4 5 80 6 7 5 20 8 II A LexisNexis JP 80,9031989 64 41 11 6 2011 667 759 http://www.moj.go.jp/shingi1/shingi04900074.html 2012/03/15 5 57 12 2 36 12 2359 60 5 23 39 4 972 4 3 23 1446 74 11 12 16 780 61 18 11 9 1981 32 7 2011 5 1 2011 6 17 2 8 6 1993 3 1993 83 93 6 1 292 1965 2000 1 005
1 1 1 2011 23 12 31 198 9 40 1 17 9 LexisNexis JP 10 III II B 9 Lexis Lexis 10 1 296 11 9 3 31 3689 5 13 6 21 17 1297 10 11 29 14 193429 8 31 5 8 1389 5 9 188 39 11 18 17 7 503172 114 59 11 28 1157 129459 75 12 2 5 30 1362 123 563 6 14 9 26 841 58 15 5 22 856 45 18 5 18 921 33 14 13 7 10 834 6414 4 16 827 40 15 11 11 30 782 5115 9 19 864 53 18 10 27 Lexis 16 4 1 14 604 17 1717 9 30 Lexis 18 14 10 22 838 15 14 10 30 Lexis 16 5 31 1869 1111166 163 19 5 30 Lexis 22 2 8 Lexis 19 3 12 19 606 47 15 7 7 860 64 9 3 24 715 42 21 10 28 997 55 13 11 12 16 780 6118 7 14 Lexis 006 2012 summer / No.392
26 27 28 29 11 III 57 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 C 20 50 30 1 23 24 25 20 11 13 551 12 4 2 26 608 35 21 3 27 539 16 4 5 6 1426 131 798 178625 4443 2 3 540 13 2 15 1753 99 13 3 8 1093 220 14 12 13 844 18 14 12 25 Lexis 15 11 17 Lexis 18 10 27 1972 96 22 17 9 29 Lexis 21 3 23 Lexis 23 21 6 12 988 28 17 9 29 Lexis 24 3 3 29 591 576 12 20 48 8 1496 173 5671138 9669 13 13 3 15 818 55 1045 17214 5 31 26 6 1 18 858 272 8 6 24 1601 125 971 19022 2 2 1005 60 16 1 20 Lexis 27 17 11 21 Lexis 28 3 11 19 44 8 4015 2 20 Lexis 18 10 17 Lexis 20 10 17 61 4 108 23 5 16 Lexis 2920 8 29 Lexis 18 11 16 Lexis 30 10 18 12 1 1968 18 25 12 3 29 1 007
31 1 2 3 32 E 34 D 89 90 33 6 1 20 4 6 35 36 31 http://www.moj.go.jp/ content/000007418.pdf 2012/03/23 http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/toko/visa/medical/pdfs/ guarantor_form.pdf 2012/03/23 32 Q5 A5 http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/toko/visa/faq.html 2012/03/23 Q&A 2012 3 23 Q A http://www.immi-moj.go.jp/tetuduki/zairyuu/qa.htm 2006/03/29 008 2012 summer / No.392
37 40 F 38 39 G III 33 34 35 1 2 3 4 http://www.city.hakodate.hokkaido.jp/reiki/reiki_int/ reiki_honbun/ar37609171.html 2012/03/23 36 5 4 4 1 2 3 4 3 http://www.city.kawaguchi.lg.jp/reiki_int/reiki_ honbun/e3040416001.html 2012/03/23 37 http://www.pref.kyoto.jp/reiki/ reiki_honbun/aa30004261.html 2012/03/23 38 2 4 3 31 1444 73902 21 39 35 9 2004 21 22 40 3 1999 1 009
41 III 1 1 2 2 42 43 2 44 45 A 41 III 3 3 III 3 3 1 2 http://www.fsa.go.jp/common/law/index.html 2012/03/26 010 2012 summer / No.392
011 1 46 8 10 12 25 759 52 11 12 9 22 794 37 36 19 11 21 1994 59 16 24 1415 1 23 Lexis 2216 5 13Lexis 37 20 11 26 2040 1261293 285 CD A A A B 42 1 295 296 6 147 164 43 3 5 1931 20 1 2 1935 49 44 1924 533 1964 452 454 45 26 14 1982 48 49 65 NBL780 2004 68 69 46 51 7 8 30 7 689 118 241827 52340 157 508 19
5 27 17 2 4 Lexis 25 X 1 18 15 8 1 Lexis C X X1 Y3 D Y1 X C D Y3 A B 13341 A B X2 C D X 2350 2 1 X Y3 Y1 X3 Y1 X3 Y1 Y1 Y3 Y2 Y1 63 1 26 42 1 1 1 A B Y3 1334 C Y1 2 012 2012 summer / No.392
013 1 33 18 11 9 1981 321255 255 X A X Y1 AY2 AY3 A A 3506 A 3500 Y1 5 3 700 47 2 25 16 11 30 Lexis X Y1 Y2 Y1 480 Y1 Y2Y2 Y2 Y1 Y2 X X Y1 X Y1 X 21 16 4 7 Lexis 276 X A 252X A 24 A Y Y11 2 8 A X 47 18 11 9 1981 32 1255 255 388 2011 42 55
5 A X A 21 3 1 9 13 1248 34 35 19 7 20 Lexis 60 6 7 7 10 10 2 1561 79 2 A 24 16 10 25 Lexis A B Y1 BY2 B X A 500 X Y1 Y2 Y1 Y2 XY1 Y2 Y1 Y2 X A Y A A X 19 15 12 19 Lexis Y Y A Y X 99 26 16 12 22 Lexis X10 10 1 15 4 20 X A14 11 5 X 943 014 2012 summer / No.392
015 1 X A Y Y X A B Y AAA Y Y Y 228 4 Y Y A A B Y Y 16 7 13 Y Y X Y Y B YX B 20 16 2 4 Lexis A X B BC B C X X B 492 12 X B 13 4 25 Y1 B Y2 B B X Y1 Y2 Y1 Y2 B 505 Y1 Y2 X 30 18 2 24 Lexis X Y1 336 Y1 Y2 Y1Y3 Y1 Y Y1 X Y2 Y3 336 Y116 8 18 X 11 29 Y2 Y3 Y2Y1 X Y2
016 2012 summer / No.392 Y2 Y3 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y 10 11 12 16 780 61 Y 2 5 X X 20 1 Y X Y X 10 48 B 23730088 48 1 10529 3 1 5 8 146 6 109 6 112
1 1 1 = / = / 8 10 12 25 1,577 0 478 0 0% 1A 11 12 9 22 4,893 0 4,893 0 0% 1A 36 19 11 21 4,465 0 4,465 0 0% 1A 1415 1 23 33 0 33 0 0% 1A 2216 5 13 56 0.8 56 0.8 100% 1% 1A 37 20 11 26 107 0 107 0 0% 1A 27 17 2 4 413 0 413 0 0% 379 0 379 0 0% 1B 18 15 8 1 1,175 1,175 1,175 0 0% 0% 1C 1 33 18 11 9 3,506 700 20% 1C 1 25 16 11 30 480 480 480 0 0% 0% 1C 2 21 16 4 7 276 276 276 276 100% 100% 1C 2 1 9 13 1,000 1,000 100% 35 19 7 20 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 100% 100% 2 1C 3 1C 3 7 10 10 2 2,352 2,352 2,352 2,352 100% 100% 1C 3 24 16 10 25 500 0 0% 2A 19 15 12 19 99 99 100% 2A 26 16 12 22 943 0 0% 2A 20 16 2 4 505 0 0% 2B 30 18 2 24 336 0 336 0 0% 2B 10 11 12 16 2B 9 11 5 31 2,644 2,644 2,644 0 0% 0% 3 12 14 9 2 300 100 300 0 0% 0% 3 4 4 4 17 334 140 42% 1,106 0 0% 4B 1 5 5 11 19 110 110 110 55 50% 50% 4B 1 23 16 6 30 460 376 460 247 66% 54% 4B 1 16 15 7 8 2,000 100 2,000 25 25% 1% 4B 2 32 18 6 6 30,000 30,000 10,000 3,119 10% 31% 4B 2 2 6 6 9 7 2,758 1,379 2,758 551 40% 20% 4B 2 31 18 3 27 711 200 711 10 5% 1% 4B 2 38 22 2 8 802 0 0% 4B 3 3 4 3 23 14,765 10,336 14,765 4,134 40% 28% 2 4B 3 34 18 12 15 10,746 453 10,746 300 66% 3% 4B 3 29 17 12 26 4,370 1,966 45% 4B 3 2 2 4 16 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 100% 100% 2 4B 3 13 14 11 29 682 166 682 166 100% 24% 4B 4 15 15 5 27 14,000 14,000 7,000 7,000 50% 100% 4B 4 3,500 0 0% 0% 17 15 7 9 640 440 3,177 1,940 3 61% 4B 4 28 17 3 24 812 812 812 812 100% 100% 4B 4 1 2 3 4 a d 1 017
Judicial Decisions on Fidelity Guarantee (1) A Study through Judicial Decisions in the Last Twenty Years Makiko Noto In this paper I took up and examined judicial decisions on fidelity guarantee (Mimoto-Hosho) in the last twenty years. Fidelity guarantee is a security system in accordance with the longstanding customs of our country. In many cases, a contract is made at the start of employment. However, depending on the situation, the fidelity guarantee contract has to be updated every five years during the employment period. Regardless of the presence or absence of legal responsibility, in Japan, the term Mimoto- Hosho is also used in various situations other than employment. In particular, a fidelity guarantee for an employee pursues a guarantor s legal responsibility. Also in this guarantee, although the legal responsibility of a guarantor is not always recognized, those who are requested to become a guarantor (Mimoto-Hoshonin) are forced under a heavy psychological burden. In principle, a guarantor assumes responsibility for compensating the damage which an employee does to an employer. Between a guarantor and an employer, the amount of the guarantor s obligation to pay reparations is not usually defined in advance. A guarantor may be burdened with a very heavy responsibility in some cases. The Fidelity Guarantee Act was enacted in 1933, and courts have limited the range of guarantor responsibility by judicial discretion based on the Act. I examined how the courts would have solved the cases in this paper. In part (1), I considered judicial decisions about the legal character of fidelity guarantee and the formation of a fidelity guarantee contract. 018 THE HIKONE RONSO 2012 summer / No.392
Judicial Decisions on Fidelity Guarantee (1) Makiko Noto 019