Similar documents
わが国のコモディティ投資信託とETF

PowerPoint プレゼンテーション

AT A GLANCE INDIVIDUAL GROUP 63.72% 1, % At a Glance INSTITUTIONAL GROUP 34.26% % GLOBAL MARKETS GROUP 5.56% % 2


NEXT FUNDS NASDAQ-100 連動型上場投信

NEXT FUNDS NASDAQ-100 連動型上場投信

<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>




NEXT FUNDS NASDAQ-100 連動型上場投信

NEXT FUNDS NASDAQ-100 連動型上場投信

149 (Newell [5]) Newell [5], [1], [1], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [1] 1) 2) ( ) ( ) 3) T : 2 a : 3 a 1 :

NEXT FUNDS NASDAQ-100 連動型上場投信

NEXT FUNDS NASDAQ-100 連動型上場投信













NEXT FUNDS NASDAQ-100 連動型上場投信

NEXT FUNDS NASDAQ-100 連動型上場投信

NEXT FUNDS NASDAQ-100 連動型上場投信

NEXT FUNDS NASDAQ-100 連動型上場投信

NEXT FUNDS NASDAQ-100 連動型上場投信

NEXT FUNDS NASDAQ-100 連動型上場投信



NEXT FUNDS NASDAQ-100 連動型上場投信

NEXT FUNDS NASDAQ-100 連動型上場投信

NEXT FUNDS NASDAQ-100 連動型上場投信

NEXT FUNDS NASDAQ-100 連動型上場投信

4.1 % 7.5 %


L Y L( ) Y0.15Y 0.03L 0.01L 6% L=(10.15)Y 108.5Y 6%1 Y y p L ( 19 ) [1990] [1988] 1

先端社会研究 ★5★号/4.山崎

Kyushu Communication Studies 第2号

‚æ4“ƒ.ren

p.


,

橡計画0.PDF

262 F s PRO A Community Investment and the Role of Non-profit Organizations: Present Conditions in the US, the UK, and Japan Takashi Koseki Abstract 1

11モーゲージカンパニー研究論文.PDF

PBO 2000~ PBO Funded Ratio - 12/31/93 to Present 140% 130% 120% 110% 100% 90% 82.6% as of 7/31/ % 70% 81.6% as of YE % 1993


yasi10.dvi

OECD Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. Mottla and Utkus Rooiji et al. Atkinson et al. MacFarland et al. Elton et al. Tang et al. Benartzi and Thaler Br

C. S2 X D. E.. (1) X S1 10 S2 X+S1 3 X+S S1S2 X+S1+S2 X S1 X+S S X+S2 X A. S1 2 a. b. c. d. e. 2


39...\1-4

IR0036_62-3.indb

大学論集第42号本文.indb

kiyo5_1-masuzawa.indd

ares_018

論文08.indd

:


1 [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15] The Boston Public Schools system, BPS (Deferred Acceptance system, DA) (Top Trading Cycles system, TTC) cf. [13] [

Web Stamps 96 KJ Stamps Web Vol 8, No 1, 2004

ネットワーク化するデジタル情報家電の動向

untitled

人工知能学会研究会資料 SIG-FPAI-B Predicting stock returns based on the time lag in information diffusion through supply chain networks 1 1 Yukinobu HA

金融システムレポート(2008年3月号)

銀行の不良債権問題と資本市場の経営監視機能 鹿野嘉昭

BJ-No.7 01 三好秀和.indd

...v..&.{..&....

untitled

MRI | 所報 | 分権経営の進展下におけるグループ・マネジメント

35...\1-4

e.g., Mahoney, Vandell, Simpkins, & Zarrett, Bohnert, Fredricks, & Randall2010 breadth intensitydurationengagement e.g., Mahone

WASEDA RILAS JOURNAL : :


最近の地価形成の特徴について

企業価値重視、効率化経営の時代到来へ

スポーツ教育学研究(2013. Vol.33, No1, pp.1-13)

Juntendo Medical Journal

untitled


A5 PDF.pwd

2 33,**. + : +/* /++** +/* /++** +/* /++** /** /** F+ +*** F+ +*** / 1*42.,43 /14+,*42 /, , 134,.,43 / 0-41,*42.4, -/41,*43,34,,+4. +

取引銀行の破綻が企業経営に及ぼす影響について-阪和銀行破綻の事例分析-

日本看護管理学会誌15-2

Public Pension and Immigration The Effects of Immigration on Welfare Inequality The immigration of unskilled workers has been analyzed by a considerab


3 - i

2017 (413812)

DI DI

国際社会文化研究所紀要 14号☆/目次



07_高平小百合.indd


Transcription:

80024622 1996

Science for Open and Environmental Systems 80024622 KIKUCHI, Atsushi Optimal Asset Allocation with Real Estate The institutional investors such as life insurance companies, trust banks, and pension funds, have to allocate their funds to several assets in order to obtain the higher but stable rate of return. Real estate is viewed as a portfolio diversifier, or risk reducer. Historically, real estate has been defined as only investments in private real estate equity and private real estate debt. The investors, who wanted to invest real estate, needed to buy and hold individual buildings directly. There were no secondary and securitized markets for private real estate debt or private real estate equity. Today, however, with the advent of securitization, the definition of real estate for institutional investors has broadened to cover many structures. We examine the relationship among the real estate index, stock index, and bond. index. We can find the difference among them. We examine that optimal asset allocation problem with real estate using mean-variance approach with the available data sets. We use the Sumitomo Life Research Index(SLRI), TOPIX, and Nikko Bond Performance Index. The results show that real estate can reduce risk on the asset mix. In our future research, we need to examine the model using additional data.

Optimal Asset Allocation with Real Estate 2001 80024622

A Study of Funds Allocation on Decentralized Organization 2001

1 1... 2 1-1... 3 2... 4 2-1... 5 2-2... 6 2-2-1... 6 2-2-2... 7 2-2-3... 8 2-2-4... 9 2-2-5... 11 3... 13 3-1... 14 3-1-1... 14 3-1-2... 16 3-2... 18 3-2-1... 18 3-2-2... 18 3-2-3... 18 3-2-4... 19 4... 20 4-1... 21 4-2 -(I)... 22 4-2-1 -(I)... 22 4-2-2 -(I)... 28 4-2-3 MV... 28 4-2-4 MLPM... 35 4-3 -(II)... 42 4-3-1 -(II)... 42 4-3-2 -(II)... 44 4-3-3 MV... 44 4-3-4 MLPM... 46 5... 49 5-1... 50... 51... 52 1

1 2

1 2000 5 11 2001 9 J-REIT: J-REIT 1991 1996 3

4

1 2-1 optimal asset allocation optimal portfolio 2 4 2-1 1 2 3 5

86 3 1990 2-2 2-2 4 3 4 3 9 223 2 3 100 6

7 2-1 2-1 2-1

11. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 2-3 2-3 8

2-4 ( ) ( ) : SPV : special purpose vehicle 2-4 2-2 9

2-2 5 2-5 5 debt CP equity 10

2-5 6 Topix National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries NCREIF 1996 10 :SLRI 6 SPC J-REIT 11

SLRI NOI 4 12

13

rp re Var(R) Minimize subject to n n Var( R) σ x x ( 3.1 ) P E j= 1 k = 1 jk j k r r ( 3.2 ) n j= 1 x j = 1 ( 3.3 ) x 0 ( j = 1,..., n) ( 3.4 ) j x X ( 3.5 ) σ jk : j k : j x = (x 1,, x n ) T x j r E r j rp : : j n : r = r x p j j= 1 (3.3) (3.4) (3.5) X (3.2)(3.4) x j 7 R 1, R n r 1t,, r nt, t = 1,, T r jt t j T p t p t = Pr{( R1,..., Rn ) = ( r1 t,..., rnt )} ( 3.6 ) p t 1/T 7 t t 14

jk r jt T 1 σ = ( r r )( r r ) ( 3.7 ) jk T t= 1 jt jk Var(R) n n j= 1 k = 1 j kt k Var( R) σ x x ( 3.8 ) jk j k (3.8) (3.7) (3.8) n n T 1 Var (R) = ( rjt rj )( rkt rk ) x jx j= k = T 1 1 t= 1 n 1 = T n n ( rjt rj ) x j ( rkt rk ) xk = j= k = T t 1 1 1 1 = T n ( r r ) x k T jt j j T t= 1 j= 1 t= 1 j= 1 y = r x r t j= 1 jt j p 2 = 1 T n 2 r jtx j rp T 1 2 Var( R) = y t ( 3.9 ) T t= 1 Minimize 1 T T t= 1 2 y t ( 3.10 ) subject to n j= 1 r x y = r jt j t p ( t = 1,..., T ) ( 3.11 ) rp r E ( 3.12 ) n j= 1 x = 1 ( 3.13 ) j x 0 ( 3.14 ) j x X ( 3.15 ) 15

Bawa and Lindenberg Mean-Lower Partial Moments model : MLPM lower partial moments 3-1 r G rg rt 3-1 k LPM ( R ; r G ) (3.16) k T 1 k LPM k ( R ; rg ) rt rg ( 3.16 ) 8 T t= 1 d + d = r r ( 3.17 ) t t t G + d t d t 0 (3.17) (1) r r 0 t G d t = + t 0, d = r r ( 3.18 ) t G 8 a = max ( a, 0 ) 16

(2) r r 0 t G t + t d = ( r r ), d = 0 ( 3.19 ) d d + 0 t t t G t = rt rg d ( 3.20 ) + d t d t + t d t d 0, 0 ( 3.21 ) + (3.17) d t d t 0 + + + + d = 5 t d d t t = 0 dt = 5 d t = 2 d t = 7 + 0 + t d t d = 0 ( 3.22 ) (3.21) + d t (3.22) d t d t 0 + (3.17) d d D + t d t d = r r + d 0 ( 3.23 ) t G d t t t { r + d r, d 0 ; t = 1 T } D = t t G t,..., ( 3.24 ) { d t dt D} = rt rg t min ( 3.25 ) k LPM ( R ; r G ) d t Minimize 1 T T t= 1 ( d t ) k ( 3.26 ) subject to n j=1 r jt x j + d t r G ( t = 1,..., T ) ( 3.27 ) d 0 ( 3.28 ) t (3.2)(3.5) k = 1 k = 2 2 k 3 k=2 17

NH FH OH F S 0 F 1+ rf = ( 3.29 ) 0 S 1 + r D r F r D : : (3.29) F t t+1 t t+1 t t+1 t t 9 (3.29) 9 :5 t t+1 t+1 18

j j NH j FH j NH j FH 1 2 njp NH 1NH 2NH nnh H 1FH 2FH nfh jnh : j jfh : j 3-2 19

20

-(I) -(II) 4-1 4-2 NUOPT 10 4-1 -(I) 4-2 -(II) 10 NUOPT 21

-(I) { }7 { }5 4-1 4-1 4-2 4-2 19921999 4-3 22

4-3 1992-1999 SLRI 90 NCREIF 92 93 4-3 4-4 4-3 1992-1999 4-4 1992-1999 4-3 7 SLRI NCREIF 23

4-4 SLRI NikkoBPI GSBI NCREIF NikkoBPI GSBI SLRI NCREIF 4-4 NH FH 4-4 1992-1999 4-5 4-6 4-5 1992-1999 24

4-6 1992-1999 4-5 NH FH FH NH FH NikkoBPI SP500_NH NCREIF_NH SP500_NH 4-6 SLRI NCREIF_NH NikkoBPI NCREIF_NH SP500_NH TOPIX SLRI NCREIF_FH NikkoBPI NCREIF_FH SLRI NikkoBPI 25

4-5 SP500_NH NikkoCBPI NikkoBPI NCREIF_NH GSBI TOPIX SLRI 4-5 1992-1999 NH 7 NikkoBPI NikkoCBPI SP500_NH 1 4-5 26

4-6 SP500_FH NikkoCBPI NikkoBPI NCREIF_FH GSBI_FH TOPIX SLRI 4-6 1992-1999 FH 7 NCREIF_FH NikkoBPI NikkoCBPI SP500_FH 1 4-6 27

MV 2 MLPM MLPM 6.22%15.94%NH0.02% 5.22%13.84%FH0.02% 5.22%15.94%OH0.02% 4-7 4-7 NHMV 4-7 28

4-8 4-8 FHMV 4-8 29

4-9 4-9 OHMV 4-9 NH FH OH 4-10 4-15 30

31 4-10 NHMV 4-11 NHMV

32 4-12 FHMV 4-13 FHMV

33 4-14 OHMV 4-15 OHMV

34 4-10 4-11 6.22%8.00% 4-8 11.00% 4-12 4-13 5.22%10.66% NCREIF_NH 4-9 TOPIX GSBI_FH 4-14 4-15 5.22%10.66% NCREIF_NH 4-10 TOPIX GSBI_FH

4-16 4-16 NHMLPM 4-16 LPM 35

4-17 4-17 FHMLPM 4-17 36

4-18 4-18 OHMLPM 4-18 NH FH OH 4-19 4-24 37

38 4-19 NHMLPM 4-20 NHMLPM

39 4-21 FHMLPM 4-22 FHMLPM

40 4-23 OHMLPM 4-24 OHMLPM

41 4-19 4-20 6.22%8.78% NCREIF_NH 4-8 NikkoBPI 11.00% NikkoCBPI SP500_NH 4-21 4-22 5.22%10.78% NCREIF_FH 4-9 TOPIX GSBI_FH NikkoBPI SP500_FH NCREIF_FH 4-23 4-24 5.22%10.78% NCREIF_NH 4-10 TOPIX GSBI_FH NikkoBPI SP500_FH NCREIF_FH

-(II) { }4 { }3 4-1 19851999 4-25 1985-1999 4-7 4-8 4-7 1985-1999 42

4-8 1985-1999 4-7 NikkoBPI NikkoBPI 4-8 SLRI TOPIX NikkoBPI NikkoBPI NikkoCBPI SLRI TOPIX 4-26 1985-1999 43

MV 2 MLPM MLPM 6.36%8.56% 0.02% 4-27 4-27 MV -(II) 4-27 44

45 4-28 4-29

4-28 4-29 6.36%7.38% SLRI 4-27 NikkoBPI NikkoBPI 4-16 4-30 MLPM -(II) 4-30 46

47 4-31 MLPM 4-32 MLPM

4-31 4-32 6.36%8.54% SLRI 4-30 48

49

1996 50

[1] J.L.Pagliari Jr., J.R.Webb, J.J.Del Casino1995 Applying MPT to Institutional Real Estate Portfolios : The Good, The Bad and Uncertain, Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, Vol.1, No.1, p.88-97 [2] 1998,, Vol.36, No.12, p.29-40 [3] 1999 1999 7, [4] 2001, [5] 1999, [6] 2001 2001, [7] 1998SPC, BP [8], /NTT 1991, 51

2 1 4 52