9 5 1 89 3 SHIBATA, Tsubasa KOSAKA, Hiroyuki 1 9 3 9 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 1967 1 1973 2 1974 3 1997 4 Vol.14 No.4 2012 Winter 013
CGE 5 6 1996 7 6 CGE 9 5 1 835 9 35 3 3.1 9 9 4012 2 5 1 8 1 35 8 12 2 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 3.2 4 United Nations GDP UN 6 12 3456 3.3 35 NITAS 1/ JTB35 014 Vol.14 No.4 2012 Winter
1997 34 2 1992 5 40 4 1 2 2 2 2 3 4 4.1 Gravity Model J.Q.Stewart1948 8 h k 1 I G P h h d h 4.2 1 d D D 2 D Vol.14 No.4 2012 Winter 015
D t 3 T h t36 mwagett 3 4 T t>1t t<1 T t1 43 T trntt waytt airt 9 123456 789 4.3 1 T trn 5 Dold_trn Dhigh_trn 3 2 T way 6 Dold_wayh k Dhigh_way 5 3 T air 7 Dair19931993h k 1993Dairt t 4 2010 9 4.4 3 2 2 016 Vol.14 No.4 2012 Winter
1 8 9 10 AT trnat wayat air 4.5 13 3 a b c a b c 9 9 2 3b 2 2 k k k k 22 5 9r n1973 10 Chenery1953 11 Moses1955 12 5.1 IO 1 11 axrij k kj1i xvr ij hikj XXRj k kj 4 12 axr ij j1i 12 5.2 13 mxr i ki h F i 5 14 mxr i ki h 14 Vol.14 No.4 2012 Winter 017
15 5.3 11 16 1416 17 k 22 CPR i hik WAGE k k P i i P c 22 k h hk 1997 4 2005 13 18 hixxr k j 9 23 19 axr k ij11axr ij 12k 20 5.4 21 kk 2k 35kh k 6 5.5 24 018 Vol.14 No.4 2012 Winter
6 5.6 R.Klain1983 147 25 wage_ratejkj1 k pc 5.7 kj 26 L k j kj 2623 k k kk k 2010 9 9 6 6.1 1 2 6.1.1 1 7 3 Core Periphery 15 Core Periphery3 Vol.14 No.4 2012 Winter 019
1.28 1.72 2.37 2.93 2.98 3.29 3.34 2 Core 0.91 1.31 1.77 2.69 2.63 3.05 3.03 Periphery 2.06 2.51 3.57 3.44 3.78 3.83 4.06 Balassa 1617 27 i ii iii 17 1 24 7 4 7 4 356 3 7 75 3 0.25 0.15 0.05 0.05 0.15 1 3 4 7 8 0.03 ir i 28 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 1 3 4 7 8 0.25 0.15 29 0.05 0.05 1 3 4 7 8 020 Vol.14 No.4 2012 Winter
0.05 % 0.05 41.92 41.89 17.05 17.03 11.84 11.80 0.15 1 3 4 7 8 % 11.20 11.21 6.66 6.66 7.60 7.66 3.72 3.75 0.30 1 3 4 7 8 0.50 0.40 0.30 1 3 4 7 8 0.15 0.05 0.05 0.15 0.25 1 3 4 7 8 9 3 8 8 9 8 6.2 IMF 151428 713 Vol.14 No.4 2012 Winter 021
2 1A A 9 30 EXR k 4 9 CPR JPNCHN 3 9 5 A 30 2B B XXR 9 A 9 31 EXR k 4 9 XXR CHN 3 9 5 B 31 3 JPNCHN ACPR 3 10 B XXR CHN 3 10 10AB 6.2.1 11A 12 BA 85 90 B 0.5 0.6 42.9 7 A B 29 JPNCHN CPR 3 10 30 CHN XXR 3 10 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.13 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.18 0.12 0.11 0.27 0.17 0.19 0.19 0.17 0.11 0.11 0.18 0.11 0.12 0.09 0.13 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.11 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.23 0.23 0.30 0.35 0.19 0.17 0.21 0.42 0.38 0.45 0.50 0.25 0.23 0.28 0.31 0.18 0.16 0.19 0.23 0.21 0.27 0.29 0.26 0.30 0.49 0.66 022 Vol.14 No.4 2012 Winter
9 155 212 3 4 5 6 7Klein, L. R.1983 8100 9 11967 Vol. 27No. 11-12 21973 242pp. 43-53 31974 pp. 187-215 41997 271pp. 37-50 5 CGENo. 12pp. 45-52 6CGE 251pp. 45-56 71996 No. 530IV-30pp. 31-40 8Stewart, J.Q.1948Demographic gravitation: evidence and applications, Sociometry, Vol. 11, pp. 31-58. 92010 SFC-RM2009-006 101973 11Chenery, H. B., Clark, P.G., and Vera Cao Pinna eds.,1953the Structure and Growth of the Italian Economy, US Mutual Security Agency. 12Moses, L.1955The Stability of Interregional Trading Patterns and Input- Output Analysis, American Economic Review, Vol. 45, No. 5, pp. 803-26. 132005 33 14Klein, L. R.,1983Lectures in Econometrics, North-Holland, Amsterdam. 15 16Balassa, Bela.,Trade Liberalization and RevealedComparative Advantage, Manchester School 33, pp. 99-123. 172009 Model Analysis on Impact of Transport Infrastructure By Tsubasa SHIBATA and Hiroyuki KOSAKA The purpose of this article is to analyze the impact of high-speed transport infrastructure development on regional economies. Then we have developed multi-regions and multi-sector model by using an interregional input-output tables from up to which covers nine regions of Japanese economy. By this system, we conducted the scenario analysis in case of no development of high speed transportations. As a result, we could uncover the mechanism of economic disparities among regions in terms transport infrastructure. Key Words : multi-sector and multi-region model, interregional input-output, accessibility index of transportation Vol.14 No.4 2012 Winter 023