橡自動車~1.PDF

Similar documents
企業の信頼性を通じたブランド構築に関する考察

Core Ethics Vol. : - : : : -

2 33,**. + : +/* /++** +/* /++** +/* /++** /** /** F+ +*** F+ +*** / 1*42.,43 /14+,*42 /, , 134,.,43 / 0-41,*42.4, -/41,*43,34,,+4. +


〈論文〉組織改革の成果に関する予備的調査--社内カンパニー制導入が財務的業績に与える影響

Web Stamps 96 KJ Stamps Web Vol 8, No 1, 2004

FC741E2_091201

<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>

_念3)医療2009_夏.indd

Webサービス本格活用のための設計ポイント



ÿþ

untitled

浜松医科大学紀要


10-渡部芳栄.indd

百人一首かるた選手の競技時の脳の情報処理に関する研究


NINJAL Project Review Vol.3 No.3

評論・社会科学 98号(P)☆/1.鰺坂

...v..&.{..&....

<82E682B15F8E E696E6464>

„h‹¤.05.07

社会システム研究21_ 畠山.indd


05_藤田先生_責

3 - i

<8ED089EF8B D312D30914F95742E696E6464>


先端社会研究 ★5★号/4.山崎

現代社会文化研究

【教】⑮長島真人先生【本文】/【教】⑮長島真人先生【本文】

Core Ethics Vol.

Studies of Foot Form for Footwear Design (Part 9) : Characteristics of the Foot Form of Young and Elder Women Based on their Sizes of Ball Joint Girth

(43) Vol.33, No.6(1977) T-239 MUTUAL DIFFUSION AND CHANGE OF THE FINE STRUCTURE OF WET SPUN ANTI-PILLING ACRYLIC FIBER DURING COAGULATION, DRAWING AND


対朝鮮人絹織物移出と繊維専門商社の生産過程への進出

_Y05…X…`…‘…“†[…h…•

Corrections of the Results of Airborne Monitoring Surveys by MEXT and Ibaraki Prefecture

St. Andrew's University NII-Electronic Library Service

取扱説明書

02[ ]小山・池田(責)岩.indd

SPA H&M ZARA ZARA ZARA DHL Door-to-door 2

新製品開発プロジェクトの評価手法

0801391,繊維学会ファイバ12月号/報文-01-西川

Bull. of Nippon Sport Sci. Univ. 47 (1) Devising musical expression in teaching methods for elementary music An attempt at shared teaching


9(2007).ren

..,,...,..,...,,.,....,,,.,.,,.,.,,,.,.,.,.,,.,,,.,,,,.,,, Becker., Becker,,,,,, Becker,.,,,,.,,.,.,,

untitled

2 122


シラバス政治学H18.PDF

202


関西における地域銀行について

ボーナス制度と家計貯蓄率-サーベイ・データによる再検証-

[ ]大野

NINJAL Research Papers No.3

大学論集第42号本文.indb

16

Virtual Window System Virtual Window System Virtual Window System Virtual Window System Virtual Window System Virtual Window System Social Networking

ユーザーズマニュアル

untitled

Core Ethics Vol. J O J O J O J O J O J O J O P C L P C L J O J O J O J O

ERINA Report

料理集

ECJ-PX50


100 SDAM SDAM Windows2000/XP 4) SDAM TIN ESDA K G G GWR SDAM GUI

149 (Newell [5]) Newell [5], [1], [1], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [1] 1) 2) ( ) ( ) 3) T : 2 a : 3 a 1 :

/ p p

8y4...l

【生】④木原資裕先生【本文】/【生】④木原資裕先生【本文】

’ÓŠ¹/‰´„û

患者-看護婦関係における共感プロセスとその影響因子

* * 2

( ) [1] [4] ( ) 2. [5] [6] Piano Tutor[7] [1], [2], [8], [9] Radiobaton[10] Two Finger Piano[11] Coloring-in Piano[12] ism[13] MIDI MIDI 1 Fig. 1 Syst

untitled

THE INSTITUTE OF ELECTRONICS, INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERS TECHNICAL REPORT OF IEICE.


( ) ( ) (action chain) (Langacker 1991) ( 1993: 46) (x y ) x y LCS (2) [x ACT-ON y] CAUSE [BECOME [y BE BROKEN]] (1999: 215) (1) (1) (3) a. * b. * (4)

Š²”u

1

untitled


<31322D899C8CA982D982A95F985F95B65F2E696E6464>

WASEDA RILAS JOURNAL

STUDIES ON THE PHYSICAL FITNESS OF SUMO WRESTLERS (REPORT II) (PHYSICAL FITNESS AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE SEKITORI) SHINKICHI OGAWA, YOSHINORI FURUTA, KE

<96DA8E9F82D982A95F944E95F1906C8AD489C88A775F33332E696E6464>

untitled


untitled

<30315F836D815B83675F95D08BCB8E812E696E6464>

Fig. 1 Schematic construction of a PWS vehicle Fig. 2 Main power circuit of an inverter system for two motors drive


日本版 General Social Surveys 研究論文集[2]

Core Ethics Vol. Epstein, CI CI CI CI CI CI CI CI Epstein, CI CI CI CI CI CI CI CI CI CI Schindler, CI CI CI CI NIH CI Finn FDA / M CI N CI N / M, CI


Transcription:

CIRJE-J-34 2000 10

Abstract In this paper, we examine the diversity of transaction patterns observed between a single pair of one automaker and one auto parts supplier in Japan. Assumed reasonably that the factor of relational skill is under control in such dyadic transaction relationship, other factors that may influence the choices of transaction patterns are explored from the perspective of product architecture. By focusing on the matching of functional and structural hierarchies, which is considered to be the core of the product architecture concept, we firstly formalize the architectural attributes of auto parts into three measurable sub concepts: (1) functional modularity, (2) structural modularity, which reflect the degree of interdependence between auto parts; and (3) modularity between auto parts and the overall auto design. Then based on the data of 33 items of auto parts collected from one Japanese supplier, hypotheses on the relationship between modularity of auto parts and three transaction patterns (the drawing-supplied parts, the drawing-approved parts and the drawing-entrusted parts) are tested. The empirical results show that only functional modularity of auto parts has significant influence on transactions of the drawing-supplied parts and the drawing-approved parts, while transactions of the drawing-entrusted parts cannot be explained within the architectural framework consistently. We believe that the reflected concern of functional aspect during the decision making of outsourcing auto parts design is important for understanding the competence of supplier management in Japanese auto industry. Especially when so-called modularization has been adopted as a strategy in the global auto industry, the function-structure paradigm may offer a clue for comparative research in the future.

1 1

2

3 X Y

4

5

6

7 Steiner

8

9

4 1 10

11

12

13 4 3 4 4

14 5 X X 5

15

16

17

18

19

20

( ) ( ) 2.6669 0.2741 1 4.1515 0.2000 0.3946* 1 2.6061 0.2645 0.2267 0.1680 1 2.1515 0.2000 0.1485 0.0371 0.0967 1 3.6667 0.2671-0.0381 0.1001-0.3364 0.4172* 1 3.2424 0.3258-0.3150 0.2251-0.4128* -0.1457 0.2942 1 1.9394 0.1991 0.1899 0.4763* 0.1351-0.2461-0.2280-0.0169 1 3.3939 0.2381 0.09601-0.1053 0.4592* -0.4100-0.6304-0.3466* 0.3679 1 ** ** 3.0000 0.1628-0.4614* -0.4168* -0.3574 0.0914 0.1686 0.1990-0.0904-0.1922 1 3.4545 0.2503-0.2812 0.1543-0.4251 0.0491 0.1622 0.3069 0.3787* -0.2159 0.6149 1 ** ** 3.5455 0.1986-0.3249* 0.2131-0.1254 0.0190-0.1439 0.1289 0.4234* -0.0728 0.4722 0.8001 1 ** ** 1

2 ( ) 1: 2: 3: 4: 5: (N=8) (N=12) (N=13) 3.125 (3.2679) 2.0909 (1.6909) 2.8571 (2.5934) 3.250 (2.2143) 4.2727 (1.0182) 4.5714 (0.5714) 3.375 (2.2679) 1.8182 (1.5636) 2.7857 (2.3352) 3.625 (1.9821) 3.4545 (1.6727) 4 (1.2308) 3.375 (3.9821) 4.6364 (0.6545) 3.0714 (1.9176) 1.375 (1.275) 4.8182 (0.1636) 3.0714 (3.6099) 1.5 (0.2857) 2.3636 (1.8545) 2.4286 (1.4945) 4 (1.7143) 2.3636 (2.0545) 3.8571 (0.7473) 3.2857 (1.2381) 2.7 (1.3444) 3 (0.5) 2.125 (1.5536) 3.7273 (1.6182) 4 (1.5385) 2.75 (1.0714) 3.3636 (1.2545) 4.1429 (0.9011)

*: %** 0.2771 (0.2874) 0.0667 (0.3236) -0.1113 (0.3969) -0.5588 (0.5880) -1.9158** (0.9249) -0.8645* (0.4821) -2.3177** (1.1993) -2.0282** (0.9870) 0.4374 (0.3252) 1.4559* (0.8002) 1.6334* (0.9822) 1.5105* (0.8158) -0.0506 (0.4340) 0.0162 (0.5394) 0.1367 (0.4955) 0.3908 (0.6988) -0.0662 (0.2926) 0.9460 (0.7198) 1.5417 (0.9982) 1.0010 (0.7329) -0.9636** (0.3965) -0.9800** (0.4414) -0.9231** (0.3714) -1.1559** (0.4508) 0.8155 (0.6723) -0.2578 (0.7648) -0.6574 (0.6899) -1.7047* (0.9169) Constant -2.7688 (1.7312) -1.8278 (2.7117) 1.1101 (1.6174) 4.5473 (2.5881) -6.2140 (4.5925) -2.1873 (2.9348) 3.0263 (2.6258) 7.7574 (3.9832) R^2 0.099 0.329 0.306 0.382 0.365 0.331 0.326 0.430

( ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 **:%*:10 0.2115 (0.2524) 0.1490 (0.2391) 0.1993 (0.2634) 0.6698* (0.3756) 1.0686* (0.5016) 0.8042** (0.4006) 1.0564** (0.4753) 0.9086* (0.5689) -0.0682 (0.2759) -0.0716 (0.2990) -0.1132 (0.3267) 0.0184 (0.3063) -0.2782 (0.3417) -0.3285 (0.3716) -0.3128 (0.3507) -0.4695 (0.4046) -0.5242* -0.7648** -0.5686-0.6662* (0.2801) (0.3369) (1.4064) (0.3699) -0.0867 (0.2020) -0.2703 (0.2254) -0.0971 (0.2045) -0.2150 (0.2515) 0.3529 (0.4622) 0.2258 (0.4570) 0.2060 (0.4388) 1.4883** (0.5374) Constant 1.2012 (1.4595) -2.0984 (2.3232) 0.1638 (1.2760) -2.1388 (1.8020) -3.6803 (3.1098) -2.2948 (2.3207) -0.4805 (1.8771) -5.7461 (2.6046) R^2 0.129 0.271 0.035 0.157 0.284 0.226 0.041 0.324

( ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 = **: %*:10-0.4268 (0.3130) -0.3160 (0.3375) -0.2160 (0.3765) -0.6863 (0.4380) 0.5336 (0.5084) -0.7210 (0.6129) 0.3707 (0.5550) 0.5905 (0.5351) -0.3921 (0.3478) -0.7251* (0.4036) -0.5807 (0.4288) -0.7372* (0.4078) 0.3372 (0.5038) 0.3315 (0.4813) 0.3000 (0.4928) 0.3390 (0.5235) 1.0370** (0.4943) 1.1410** (0.5479) 0.7360** (0.6587) 1.0045* (0.6068) 1.2789** (0.6042) 1.7518** (0.9565) 1.3295** (0.6295) 1.6645* (0.9598) -0.4479 (0.4956) -0.2145 (0.5636) 0.3940 (0.5946) -1.0878* (0.6212) Constant -2.9118 (2.2289) -6.0345 (3.5213) -5.7774 (3.0712) -5.5746 (3.7269) -2.5351 (5.0572) -5.2337 (3.8618) -7.3974 (4.0973) -2.7307 (4.3094) R^2 0.331 0.314 0.395 0.409 0.332 0.317 0.404 0.467

( ) = 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 **: %*:10-0.1949 (0.3489) -0.2664 (0.3428) -0.1865 (0.3736) -0.5852 (0.4388) 0.0924 (0.6890) -0.5159 (4.6548) -0.3360 (0.8370) 0.0541 (0.7058) -0.4195 (0.3979) -0.4558 (0.4025) -0.3820 (0.4224) -0.4320 (0.4127) 0.3117 (0.5173) 0.1732 (0.4796) 0.3008 (0.5116) 0.2264 (0.5163) 1.1952* (0.5212) 1.2311* (0.5647) 0.5785** (0.9055) 1.4048** (0.9128) 1.0600** (0.6015) 1.7813** (1.1048) 1.1093* (0.6323) 1.2209* (0.8346) -0.6297 (0.8186) 0.1917 (0.7238) 0.3512 (0.5993) -1.2213* (0.6562) Constant -3.6049 (2.4150) -4.5398 (4.5293) -4.7468 (3.0550) -1.5475 (4.6548) 1.7734 (8.6398) -5.5488 (6.1605) -6.2402 (4.1158) 0.0356 (4.5786) R^2 0.371 0.363 0.318 0.401 0.378 0.365 0.328 0.438