33 27-42 2012 27 4 4 4 1 4 4 4 4 1993:6 1910 1920 1993 1)
28 1987; 2004 2000; 2001 1997; 2000Heath and Cleaver 2003; 2008; 2009a DINKS 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 political correctness 2),, 2 4 4 4 3 4 2 2.1
29 1920 1980:137 1972:7 1980:798-799 3) 1937[1970]:61 1958:15 1988 1993:6 2.2 1 B A C 1993:27-29 A B C A+B B C =B 1 1993:27-29 1993:7
30 1993:3 4 4 4 4 A C 2.3 2 (1) B 1 (2)A 1 (3)C 1 C A B p n q C A +B +m+n B +p =(B +p)+(a +q) =(B +p)+(n+c ) =B +n 2 A C (4) (5) (6) C
31 (7) A C 1 A 2 1 C 2 2 2 2.4 2002 1960 12 7 1
32 35 1960 1985
33 3 2000 5 1985 2.5 4 4 4 4 3 2007:4
34 1990:2 Pahl 1989=1994 2000 2004 60 G J 3.1 1992, 2005 household economics full income household production Becker 1981 1993 Becker 1981 1993 Pahl 1989=1994:4 2002:34-36 1992:143-144 3.2
35 Cigno 1991=1997 single-person household 2 multi-person households composite household nuclear family 1991=1997 3 1991=1997:36, 41-48 4 4 4 3.3 2001:14
36 1960 2000:193 house keeping money 2000:43 2000:212-213 80 90 1990; 1992 Pahl 1989=1994:10-11 2007:10 2000:34-35 1992:17 5 (1989=1994)
37 4 4 4 3.4 4 4 4 2000, 2005 4 4 4, 4 4 4 4,,
38,, 2 1993:6 6) 7), 8)
39, 5 2 4 4 4 3 4, 1993 28 9) 1) 2009:3 2009:22 2) 3)
40 1980:153 4) 2000 1984 2007 5) 6),,,, 7) 2002 8) 2007 9) 2009 2009b Becker, G S., [1981] 1991, A Treatise on the Family, Harvard University Press. Cigno A., 1991, Economics of the Family, Oxford University Press. 1997 Heath, S., E Cleaver., 2003, Young, Free and Single?: Twenty-somethings and Household Change, Palgrave Macmillan. 2000 1990 8: 26-31 2008 36-50 2000 2009 21(2):188-194 2001, 49: 14-24. 2004, 119-171 19601920-1955 134 4-20 1997 200217-49 2009a 2009b 104-36 1987
41 1992, 2007 1988 1972 31-12 1993 1993 2000 20052005 :26-30 1958 2007 1984 19: 32-42 2007 Pahl, J., 1989, Money and Marriage Macmillan Education. 1994 1992 2005 23:33-43 200253(3): 12-19 2002 [1937]1970,2009, 2-26 1980 73(5): 790-809 200454(4): 341-354 (KAFS) 2010 4
42 Between the Family and the Household: Theoretical Re ections for Reconstructing the Contemporary Concept of the Household Hiroyuki KUBOTA Abstract: Contrary to the concept of the family as institutional and idealistic groups, the concept of the household has been widely utilized as an objective and substantial unit from a socio-economical standpoint. However, this concept of the household was actually conceptualized cross-referentially, rather than independent of, the concept of the family, so there are dif culties in understanding the contemporary diverse situations surrounding families. This paper, by scrutinizing some important studies in family sociology and household economics, addresses how and why the concept of the household has con ned the possible diversity of collective lifestyles into the family household. First, looking back at the works by Teizo TODA, Kiyomi MORIOKA and Hiroaki Shimizu, aids in the understanding of what was chosen and eliminated in conceptualizing the household. A bipolarization of the concept of the household into individual households and family households can be seen, by eliminating other collective lifestyles in the process of conceptualizing the household in relation with families. Second, household economics has long tried to focus on household accounts in order to theorize the household as substantial economic unit composed of self-interested individuals. This methodological individualism, however, seems to have compromised with familialism, in that even household economics implicitly assumes a closely shared household account like families as a general model of shared household account, which results in excluding other less closely shared household accounts. In conclusion, this paper reconstructs the concept of the household in concordance with the contemporary diverse situations surrounding families, by suggesting that the idea of shared household account should be expanded and thus the concept of the household should be merged into cohabitation. This simpli ed concept of the household will be successful in including various collective lifestyles rst and then discussing the other features among diverse households within and without families. Key Words : household, household account, non-family