/Review 1 1 1 1 2 Innovation Process Technology Hideyasu KARASAWA 1, Katsuro SAGANE 1, Hidenaga KARASAWA 1, Akira KURIYAMA 1, and Minoru KOBAYASHI 2 Abstract We propose a methodology for Innovation Process Technology by Dual ComBine Analysis. This methodology consists of purpose orchestration for target creation, innovation concept design and mind means encounter process. This technical area can be formulated as the trilateral matching problem. Dual ComBine Analysis will be effectiveapproachto the problem. Keywords innovation process technology, concept design, Dual ComBine Analysis, Purpose Engineering, F-CAP system, mind means encounter process, trilateral matching problem 1. 4 [1] PDCA [2] KJ [3] TRIZ [4] 5 1 1-53-46 2 3-30-1 1 Data Cake Baker Corporation, 1-53-46 Sakuragaoka, Tama-City, Tokyo 2 Fukuoka Institute of Technology, 3-30-1 Wajiro-higashi, Higashiku, Fukuoka, Japan Received: 2 February 2015, 8 March 2015 [5] NPS E. M. [6] 1 2 3 3 3 44 9 1
Innovation Process Technology 2. 1% 99% 1 10 100 [7] 3.5 II 3 : A. B. C. A. M. [8, 9] QFD DCB-Analysis: Dual ComBine Analysis 2 3 DCB-Analysis 3 a. b. c. 3. 3.1 7 Oukan Vol.9, No.1 45
Karasawa, H. et al. 3 [10] M&A [11] 3 3.2 J. F. 3 3 MAC U2 3D 3 SONY 3.5 GPS [12] MAC 3 46 9 1
Innovation Process Technology 3.3 2020 3 2 2 F-CAP [10] [13] [14, 15] [16] 2014 160 3 3 4. 4.1 3 As-Is To-Be To-Do 3 To-Do To-Be To-Do To-Be 1% 99% 3 Oukan Vol.9, No.1 47
Karasawa, H. et al. 4.2 [17] 15 4 4 5 No.1. M. No.1 3 [18] SUV [19] ICT To-Do 4.3 48 9 1
Innovation Process Technology 2 3 5. 5.1 [20] 3 3 Oukan Vol.9, No.1 49
Karasawa, H. et al. Fig. 1: QFD Trinitron system for DCB-Analysis 3 12 5.2 QFD QFD: Quality Functional Deployment [21] Fig. 1 Quality [12] GA 50 9 1
Innovation Process Technology 3.5 [21] E- DSM 4 6. RDF AIC BIC 4 IBM AI 70% 45 30 Oukan Vol.9, No.1 51
Karasawa, H. et al. 2000 [12] [10] k- 7. AI [11] 7.1 US [22] 7.2 A B B A B B A A B C A A C B C 3 2 4 4 A B A B A B C 3 7.3 3 2 52 9 1
Innovation Process Technology p X Y 3 (1) (2) (3) (3) Y = kd q M At M X (1) X = ld (1 q) N A N Y (2) A D k l q (1) X Y (2) X Y 3 [23] 7.4 (1) 4 (2) 4 1 (3) 4 7.5 1 Homogeneity Analysis 8. Oukan Vol.9, No.1 53
Karasawa, H. et al. QFD 10 [24] F-CAP [25] 30 [26] 4 EU Industry 4.0 US Open Government Platform OGPL Industrial Internet Intelligent Maintenance IoT 50 1971 16 IBMPC Xerox Star 10 1981 1991 2001 9.11 P/L B/S SOX 2011 3.11 UK CO 2 EU ICT ICT 54 9 1
Innovation Process Technology : [22] : pp. 356-357 2014 [23] : 23 pp. 52-55 2011 [24] : 23 pp. 210-211 2011 [25] H. Karasawa: Methodology of Project Management of New Product Development Type: The Flexible PERT Chart and its Application, Proceedings of the 2 nd World Conference and the 15th Annual POM Conference, CD-ROM, 2004. [26] : 1995-2006 [1] : 4.0 ICT Vol.24 No.4 pp. 220-228 2015 [2] J. A. : p. 1801993 [3] : pp. 229-305 1993 [4] CPM TRIZ : TRIZ 2003 [5] C. M. : pp. 55-63 2004 [6] E. M. : pp. 9-102002 [7] 1963 [8] M. : 2008 [9] : 17 2003 [10] : 2013 [11] : 1999 [12] : 2006 [13] : 1. p. 113 1984 [14] : p. 3 2013 [15] : pp. 53-66 1977 [16] : - Vol.65, No.3 p. 143 2014 [17] Quantum Marketing WIRED Vol.14 p. 011 pp. 122-139 2015 [18] M. : pp. 40-53 2003 [19] : pp. 85-156 2005 [20] J. S. : 2007 [21] : 2010 1964 2000 1969 1969 CAD TV SC No.1 2004 2000 2004 2006 2008 2010 2011 Gp. 1997 2007 2014 Oukan Vol.9, No.1 55