73-5　大友

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "73-5　大友"

ようじろうあきくぼ
5 years ago
Views:

1 Journal of the Japanese Association for Petroleum Technology Vol. 73, No. 5 Sept., 2008 pp Lecture HSQE * ** Received July 31, 2008 accepted September 11, 2008 Implementation of HSQE Kazuhisa Otomo Abstract The Piper Alpha disaster occurred in the UK sector of the North Sea in The disaster shook the oil industry into recognizing the importance of safety management systems. Three years later, in 1991 JDC commenced operations in Australia and realized that a safety management system would become an important part of offshore oil and gas operations. JDC implemented its HSE Management Plan MP across the company in 1994, upgraded it to HSE Management System MS in 1998, and, most recently, modified it to the HSQE MS in August The main additions revolved around Q, namely quality, and meeting the requirements of ISO Keywords OHSAS18001, ISO9001, ISO14001, ISM-Code, ABS, HSQE, management system Piper Alpha Health Safety Environment Management Plan HSE MP 1998 Shell HSE Management System HSE MS ISM Code MODU 2 MODU HSE Q HSQE MS HSQE PDCA 1 2 * HSE This paper was presented at the 2008 JAPT Drilling Symposium entitled Development of Human Resources and HSE Activities held in Niigata, Japan, June 11, ** Japan Drilling Co., Ltd HSQE Management System 2.1 HSQE MS ABS HSQE MS HSQE Health Safety Quality Environment H & S OHSAS S ISM Code Q ISO 9001 E ISO ISM Code IMOSOLAS MODU ISO 9001 / ISO Copyright 2008 JAPT

2 374 HSQE 1 HSE MS PDCA-Cycle 2 HSQE MS PDCA-Spiral Loop ISO 2.2 Quality HSQE MS Q HSE Q Q ISO 9001 ISM Code ISM Code ISO 9001 ISO ABS HSQE Guideline ISM Code OHSAS BS 8800 ISO ISO OHSAS Occupational Health & Safety Assessment Series 4 HSQE MS Document Structure

3 HSQE MS Document HSQE MS Document 4 HSQE MS Manual Process Flowchart PR PR Instruction IN Record RC Manual ABS HSQE MS 1 PR Manual Flowchart 5 Process Flowchart HSE MS HSQE MS 1 IN PR Meeting RC Maintenance Report IN Blank Form Form 2.4 Risk Assessment OHASAS Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment HIRA HIRA HSE MS 5 Process Flowchart J. Japanese Assoc. Petrol. Technol. Vol. 73, No

Comments Risk Potential 4 2 Risk Assessment Matrix P People A Asset E Environment R Reputation Dominant Risk Low Medium High Severe 4 High

4 376 HSQE 1 HIRA Work Sheet 1. HAZARD Number 2. HAZARD SOURCE 3. MAJOR ACCIDENT CONSEQUENCES 4. IADC Cross Check 5. RISK POTENTIAL 6. Existing Control Measures 7. Dominant Risk 8. Recommendations 9. Comments Risk Potential 4 2 Risk Assessment Matrix P People A Asset E Environment R Reputation Dominant Risk Low Medium High Severe 4 High Severe Hazard Severe High Hazard Significant Hazard Register 2.5 Environmental Aspects & Impacts Analysis ISO Environmental Aspects & Impacts Analysis EAI HIRA 2 3 CO 2 EAI 1 HIRA Work Sheet 2 Risk Assessment Matrix

377 3 EAI Work Sheet 3. 3.1 2002 ISM Code HSE HSQE MS Q HSQE MS HSQE 3.

5 377 3 EAI Work Sheet ISM Code HSE HSQE MS Q HSQE MS HSQE 3.2 Training Training HSQE MS Awareness Training HSQE MS Seminar HSQE MS Training Training Safety Training Drill 4. HSE Q HSQE HSQE MS Document Training HSQE MS HSQE MS PDCA Spiral Loop HSQE MS J. Japanese Assoc. Petrol. Technol. Vol. 73, No

74-2　岩間

74-2　岩間 128 74 2 21 3 128 134 Journal of the Japanese Association for Petroleum Technology Vol. 74, No. 2 March, 2009 pp. 128 134 Lecture * ** Received February 23, 2009 accepted February 26, 2009 The impact of

73-5 大友

73-5　大友