多国籍企業における企業の境界の理論的視角

Similar documents
Microsoft Word - 荳ュ蟲カ諱オ

観光研究論集 第12号/2.中島

04長谷川英伸_様.indd

3 * *

untitled

中小企業の量的成長と質的成長 Size Growth and Capability Growth by Small Firms 髙橋美樹 (Miki Takahashi) 企業の成長には2つの側面があり 従業員数や資本金 売上高でみた量的な側面と イノベーション創出能力あるいは組織能力でみた質的な側

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right


- March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade

1 (1997) (1997) 1974:Q3 1994:Q3 (i) (ii) ( ) ( ) 1 (iii) ( ( 1999 ) ( ) ( ) 1 ( ) ( 1995,pp ) 1

2 / 24


商学 63‐3☆/6.山本

, 3 2 Marshall [1890]1920, Marshall [1890]1920

濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G

NIES ASEAN4.. NIES.....EU.. ASEAN4 NIES

206“ƒŁ\”ƒ-fl_“H„¤‰ZŁñ


Walter et al. 2009: 1 Helleiner 1994 Strange 1971: Gilpin 1987: -65 Strange b, 1998c,

関西における地域銀行について




Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

社会学部紀要 121号/1.藤沢

GDPギャップと潜在成長率

Alfred D. Chandler, Jr. large, vertical integrated, managerially directed enterprise coordinate market hierarchies of salaried managers visible hand o

59-1・2 鳥居昭夫・春日教測 .pwd



林.TXT

201/扉

:- Ofer Feldman,Feldman : -


headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart s

Baba and Nobeoka CAE Computer Aided Engineering

佐野先生投影資料

小阪玄次郎先生.indd

ハイコミットメントモデルの有効性についての考察 

19世紀の物価動向―コンドラチェフによる物価長波の検討を通じて―*

13....*PDF.p

2

美術館・博物館(ミュージアム)における顧客との関係性構築と戦略・行動に関する試論

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step

中京大学経済学論叢 23 号 2012 年 3 月 審査論文 1 Keywords: JEL Classi cation: L13, L22, L33 1 * *1 Inoue, Kamijo, and Tomaru (2009) Mukherjee and Suestrong

情意要因が英語の読解力と会話力に及ぼす影響-JGSS-2008 のデータから-

02古郡氏李氏_a_4.indd

BJ-No.7 01 三好秀和.indd

untitled

Transcription:

I Atsuo Takenaka / Coase, 1937 Transaction Cost Theory Resource-Based Theory Knowledge-Based Theory Langlois & Robertson, 1995; 2003; 2011 110 2013 winter / No.398

II 1. Hymer, 1960 international operations Vernon, 1966 1) control Hymer, 1960, 31-35 Hymer, 1960, 29 Hymer, 1960, 35-37 1) 1992 1998 2006 111

Hymer, 1960, 63-64 Hymer, 1960, 40 Hymer, 1960, 42-43 2. 1960 = Buckley & Casson, 1976 1937 2) internalization theory 1998 56 = 1976 = intermediate products Buckley & Casson, 1976 p.33 2) 1960 1937 1992 32-34 112 2013 winter / No.398

Buckley & Casson, 1976, pp.37-39 = Buckley & Casson, 1976, pp.39-40 Buckley & Casson, 1976, p.45 Buckley & Casson, 1976, pp.41-43 Buckley & Casson, 1976, p.44 = 3) Buckley & Casson, 1976, p.56 Buckley & Casson, 1976, pp.68-69 = 3) = 1976 1960 1998 58-59 113

2007 55 = 1937 Williamson, 1975 Rugman, 1981 Hennart, 1982 1960 eclectic Dunning, 1977, 1979, 1981, 1988 eclectic theory ownership location internalization 1 Dunning, 1979, p.275 114 2013 winter / No.398

1 1. a. b. i. ii. 2. b. 3. Dunning 1988 27 Table1.1 1960 2006 37 3. 115

1991 1 Hennart, 1991, p.85 Hennart, 1991, p.85 Langlois & Robertson, 1995, 52-53 2009 167-168 どこで生産するのか? 誰が生産するのか? 販売子会社を通じた供給 国内生産 ( 輸出 ) 代理店 流通業者と接触 優位性の輸出 海外生産 生産子会社への統合 ライセンス フランチャイズを通じた優位性の販売 Hennart 1991, p.86, Figure 4.1 1 116 2013 winter / No.398

III 1. Penrose, 1959 1980 Wernerfelt, 1984 =Dierickx & Cool, 1989 Barney, 1991 1991 valuable rare imperfectly imitable substitutability =1989 1956 Penrose, 1956, p.225 2007 57 117

2. = Kogut & Zander, 1993 social communities Kogut & Zander, 1993, p.627 = Kogut & Zander, 1993, p.627 Kogut & Zander, 1993, p.629 = 2 Kogut & Zander, 1993, p.631 100 25 Kogut & Zander, 1993, p.631 overdetermined = codifiability 4) Teece, 2009 = 1993 Teece, 2009, 145 118 2013 winter / No.398

teachability complexity 3 Kogut & Zander, 1993, pp.632-633 35 82 Kogut & Zander, 1993, p.635 = 4) 5) 3. 2 2 5) = Gupta & Govindarajan, 2000 Almeida et al., 2002 119

Rugman, 1981, 25 Almeida et al., 2002, p.159 IV Brusoni et al., 2001 2003 2010 120 2013 winter / No.398

25 B 24730314 B 24330119 Almeida,P., J.Song and R.M.Grant 2002 / Are Firms Superior to Alliances and Markets? An Empirical Test of Cross-Border Knowledge Building, Organization Science, Vol.13, No.2, pp.147-161. Barney,J. 1991 / Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, Vol.17, No.1, pp.99-120. Brusoni,S., A.Prencipe and K.Pavitt 2001 / Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Firms Know More Than They Make? Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.46, No.4, pp.597-621. Buckley,P.J. and M.Casson 1976 / The Future of the Multinational Enterprise / London, Basingstoke: The Macmillan Press Limited. Coase,R. 1937 / The Nature of the Firm, Economica, Vol.4, No.16, pp.386-405. Dierickx,I. and K.Cool 1989 / Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage, Management Science, Vol.35, No.12, pp. 1504-1511. Dunning,J.H. 1977 / Trade, Location of Economic Activity and the MNE: A Search for an Eclectic Approach, in B.Ohlin, P.Hesselborn and P.M.Wijkman(eds.), The International Allocation of Economic Activity: Proceedings of a Nobel Symposium held at Stockholm / London: MacMillan, pp.395-418. Dunning,J.H. 1979 / Explaining Changing Patterns of International Production: In Defence of the Eclectic Theory, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol.41, No.4, pp.269-295. Dunning,J.H. 1981 / International Production and the Multinational Enterprise / London: George Allen & Uniwin. Dunning,J.H. 1988 / Explaining International Production / London: Unwin Hyman. 2010 Gupta,A.K. and V.Govindarajan 2000 / Knowledge Flows within Multinational Corporations, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21, No.4, pp.473-496. 1998 Hennart, J.-F. 1982 / A Theory of Multinational Enterprise / Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Hennart, J.-F. 1991 / The Transaction Cost Theory of the Multinational Enterprise, in C.N.Pitelis and R.Sugden(eds.), The Nature of the Transnational Firm / London, New York: Routledge, pp.81-116. 1992 121

Hymer,S. 1960 / The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment, Doctoral Dissertation / MIT. (Published in 1976, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.) 1978 1 Kogut, B. and U. Zander 1993 / Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol.24, No.4, pp.625-645. 2011 45 2 87-100 Langlois, R. N. and P.L.Robertson 1995 / Firms, Markets and Economic Change: A Dynamic Theory of Business Institutions / London: Routledge. NTT 2004 Penrose, E. T. 1956 / Foreign Investment and the Growth of the Firm, Economic Journal, Vol.66, pp.220-235. Penrose, E. T. 1959 / The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, John Wiley / Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Rugman, A. M. 1981 / Inside the Multinationals: The Economics of Internal Markets / London: Croom Helm. 1983 Teece, D. J. 2009 / Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management: Organizing for Innovation and Growth / New York: Oxford University Press. S 2013 Vernon,R. 1966 / International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.80, No.2, pp.190-207. Wernerfelt,B. 1984 / A Resource-based View of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.5, No.2, pp.171-180. Williamson,O.E. 1975 / Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications / New York: The Free Press. 1980 2007 2006 2009 2003 122 2013 winter / No.398

Theoretical Perspectives of the Boundaries of the Multinational Firm Atsuo Takenaka This paper reviews and discusses the theoretical perspectives of the boundaries of the multinational firm. In organization theory, the study of the boundaries of the firm has been performed based on various theories, such as transaction cost theory, resource-based theory and knowledge-based theory. These theories have been also applied in the study of the determination of the boundaries of the multinational firm. In particular, there are two major theoretical perspectives in the study of the issue: transaction cost/internalization theory and knowledge-based theory of the multinational firm. Each of these perspectives vary in their hypotheses concerning the major factor determining the boundaries of the multinational firm, and can provide critical insights into the analysis of the issue. The paper compares and contrasts these two perspectives, and also proposes the future research directions. Theoretical Perspectives of the Boundaries of the Multinational Firm Atsuo Takenaka 123