わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題
|
|
|
- ひろみ たけすえ
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 * ** *** No.05-J
2 No.05-J * [email protected] ** [email protected] *** [email protected] 1
3 [2000] Hirota[1999] [2004] GMM
4 3 3 3 [2004] 3
5
6
7 [2004] 1 DI 2 DI 6
8 IN database [2004] 7
9 Bloomberg Bloomberg
10 MM pecking order 5 Harris and Raviv [1991] 6 Modigliani and Miller [1958] 7 11 BOX 9
11 Myers and Majluf [1984] Jensen [1986] Aghion and Bolton [1992] 8 Baker and Wurgler [2002] 8 10
12 [2004] 4 [2004] 1 [2004] * [2004] i t d it xkit k = 1L K d * it = β + β x + β x + L+ β x 0 1 1it 2 2it K Kit, i = 1L I t = 1LT (1b) i t d it * d = ( d d ) d λ (2b) it it 1 it it it 1 zlit l = 1L L λ = γ + γ z + γ z + L+ γ z it 0 1 1it 2 2it L Lit (3b) (1b) (3b) (2b) d it ( β + β x + + β x ) = ( ( γ + γ z + L+ γ z )) 0 1 1it L K Kit it L Lit ( d it ( β 0 + β1x1 it + + β K xkit )) + ηi + ε it L 1 (4b) ηi i ε it (4b) dynamic model 1 GMM A BBB A
13 multinomial logit model McFadden[1973]Green[2000] i J +1 j U ( yi = j) U ij uij ε ij U = + ε (1) ij u ij ij i j j k { } U ij > max U (2) ik U ij ε ij i j Prob y = j ( ij ik ik ) ( y = j) = Prob u ij + ε = max{ u + ε } k ( ) Prob i (3) i 9 Nerlove and Press [1973] models with discrete dependent variables probit model 12
14 i m i ( x, x 2,, x ) x (4) i1 i K im j u ij u ij = β + x + x + + β x = β j0 β j1 i1 β j2 i2 K jm im jxi (5) β jl i l ε ij 10 Prob ( y = j) ( β x ) exp i = J j i for j = 0,1, L, J exp k= 0 ( β x ) k i (6) (6) xi J +1 (6) β 0 = 0 11 (6) Prob ( y = j) ( β x ) j i i = forj = 1, L, J 1+ exp k= 1 exp ( β x ) k i J (7) 10 conditional logit model ordered logit model nested logit model 3 11 β0 = 0 13
15 Prob ( = 0) y i = 1 + J k= 1 1 exp ( β x ) k i (8) 12 ln L N J = i= 1 j= 0 d ( y j) ij ln Prob i = (9) dij i j 1 0 β γ j marginal effect β (6) P J j γ j = = P j[ β j Pk β k ] = P j[ β j β] for j = 0,1L, J (10) x ( P Prob j) i j y i = k = 0 β i (10) γ j β j 12 2 IIAIndependence of Irrelevant Alternatives 14
16 IT 99 9 IT Train [2003]
17 y i = 0 2,355 y i = 1 1,546 y i = y i = 3 64 y i = 4 58 y i = y i = 6 45 y i = ,968 16
18 3 QUICK AMSUS IN Bloomberg , A 1,325BBB 810 2, A BBB R&I t [2004] 17
19 t TOPIX t Rajan and Zingales [1995] 18
20 18 t 19 A BBB % % % % ,349 57,990 34,814 19,651 % ,709 11,118 10,295 3, ,701,958,872 5,006,823,536 3,010,315,020 2,821,464, ,227, ,027, ,779, ,267, A BBB A A
21 621 TOPIX 20
22 1415 t 21
23 2 22
24 t *** *** ** * *** E E E E E * 2.454E *** *** *** *** E E *** 6.785E E E *** 8.008E *** *** *** E E *** 8.476E E E E *** *** *** E E ** 3.723E E E *** 1.311E *** * *** *** *** E E *** 5.867E E E *** 9.809E *** ** *** ** * E E *** 4.290E E E E *** ** *** ** E E *** 7.743E E E *** 1.973E White [1980] 2. t *10% **5% ***1% t 23
25 t *** ** *** E E E E E * 2.854E *** *** *** *** E E *** 6.826E E E *** 7.974E *** ** *** *** E E *** 6.939E E E E *** ** *** *** E E ** 3.765E E E *** 1.270E *** *** *** *** E E *** 5.917E E E *** 9.831E *** *** *** *** * E E * 3.688E E E E *** *** * E E *** 8.995E E E *** 1.984E White [1980] 2. t *10% **5% ***1% t 24
26 i (6) Prob ( y = j) ( β x ) exp i = J j i forj = 0,1, L, J exp k = 0 ( β x ) k i β xi A BBB 13 A A A 21 BBB A 25
27 17 A BBB 26
28
29
30 [2004] 2004 [2004] No.04-J-15 [2000] Aghion, P., and P. Bolten [1992], An Incomplete Contracts Approach to Financial Contracting, Review of Economic Studies 59, pp Baker, M., and J. Wurgler [2002], Market Timing and Capital Structure, Journal of Finance 62, pp Greene, W. H. Econometric Analysis, 4 th Edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 2000 Harris, M. and A. Raviv [1991], The Theory of Capital Structure, Journal of Finance 46, pp Hirota, S. [1999], Are Corporate Financing Decisions Different in Japan?: An Empirical Study on Capital Structure, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 13, pp Jensen, M. C.[1986], Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers, American Economic Review 76, pp McFadden, D.[1973], Conditional Logit Analysis of Quantitative Choice Behavior, In P. Zerembka, ed., Frontier in Econometrics, New York: Academic Press. Modigliani, F., and M. H. Miller [1958], The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment, American Economic Review 48, pp Myers, S., and N. Majluf [1984], Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms have Information that Investors Do not Have, Journal of Financial Economics, 13, pp Nerlove, M., and S. Press, Univariate and Multivariate Log-linear and Logistic Models, RAND-R1306-EDA/NIH, Santa Monica, Rajan, R. G., and L. Zingales [1995], What Do We Know About Capital Structure?: Some Evidence from International Data, Journal of Finance 50, pp Train, K., Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge University Press, White, H. [1980], A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity, Econometrica 48, pp
わが国企業による株主還元策の決定要因：配当・自社株消却のインセンティブを巡る実証分析
* [email protected] ** [email protected] No.05-J-6 2005 4 103-8660 30 No.05-J-6 2005 4 * ** 1990 1 2 1990 * [email protected] ** [email protected] 1 1990 1 1990 1 [2004]
aragciv54mac.dvi
2013 3 25 ( 4 ) Modigliani-Miller(1963) 1 1 1 IRR ( ) NPV IRR NPV IRR NPV IRR 100 EBIT 20 20% τ (1 τ) 20% CC tax = S V ρ S + B V (1 τ)ρ B (1) S B V ρ S CAPM 1 ρ B *1 (1) MM *2 ( ) MM MM ( ) MM (1 τ) 20%
BB 報告書完成版_修正版）040415.doc
3 4 5 8 KW Q = AK α W β q = a + α k + βw q = log Q, k = log K, w = logw i P ij v ij P ij = exp( vij ), J exp( v ) k= 1 ik v i j = X β αp + γnu j j j j X j j p j j NU j j NU j (
株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─
q E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] OECD Vives Tirole Shleifer and Vishny q %% %% % % Allen and Gale %% % Admati, Pfreiderer and Zechner Burkart, Gromb and Panunzi Cremer 1995Pagno
082_rev2_utf8.pdf
3 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1 3 3 3 2008 3 2008 2008 3 2008 2008, 1 5 Lo and MacKinlay (1990a) de Jong and Nijman (1997) Cohen et al. (1983) Lo and MacKinlay (1990a b) Cohen et al. (1983) de Jong and Nijman (1997)
headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart s
CJEB The financial strategies of Japanese multinational enterprises and internal capital market, Columbia Business School, CJEB, Working Paper No., April,. headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart
autocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] (A)
![autocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] (A)](/thumbs/93/112038541.jpg "autocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] (A)")
Discussion Paper Series A No.425 2002 2 186-8603 [email protected] 14 1 24 autocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] 1990 12 13 (A) 12370027 13 1 1980 Lo/MacKinlay [1988]
23_02.dvi
Vol. 2 No. 2 10 21 (Mar. 2009) 1 1 1 Effect of Overconfidencial Investor to Stock Market Behaviour Ryota Inaishi, 1 Fei Zhai 1 and Eisuke Kita 1 Recently, the behavioral finance theory has been interested
03.Œk’ì
HRS KG NG-HRS NG-KG AIC Fama 1965 Mandelbrot Blattberg Gonedes t t Kariya, et. al. Nagahara ARCH EngleGARCH Bollerslev EGARCH Nelson GARCH Heynen, et. al. r n r n =σ n w n logσ n =α +βlogσ n 1 + v n w
Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC
90 ª ª * [email protected] i ii iii iv SNA 1 70 80 2 80 90 80 80 90 1 80 90 98 6 1 1 SNA 2 1 SNA 80 1SNA 1 19931998 1 2-190 1,2 2 2-2 2-3,4 3 2-5 4 2030 2-3 3 2-15 97 20 90 2-15 9198 1.
1970). Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C. and R. D. Willig (1982); Contestable Markets and The Theory of Industry Structure, 1982. Caves, R. and M. E. Porter (1977); From entry barriers to mobility barriers:
遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』
2-1. (2-1 ) (2-2 ) (2-3 ) (Hayashi [1986]Dekle [1989]Barthold and Ito [1992] [1996]Campbell [1997] [1998]Shimono and Ishikawa [2002]Shimono and Otsuki [2006] [2008]Horioka [2009]) 1 2-1-1 2-1-1-1 8 (1.
2 1,2, , 2 ( ) (1) (2) (3) (4) Cameron and Trivedi(1998) , (1987) (1982) Agresti(2003)
3 1 1 1 2 1 2 1,2,3 1 0 50 3000, 2 ( ) 1 3 1 0 4 3 (1) (2) (3) (4) 1 1 1 2 3 Cameron and Trivedi(1998) 4 1974, (1987) (1982) Agresti(2003) 3 (1)-(4) AAA, AA+,A (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1)-(5) 1 2 5 3 5 (DI)
橡同居選択における所得の影響（DP原稿）.PDF
** *** * 2000 13 ** *** (1) (2) (1986) - 1 - - 2 - (1986) Ohtake (1991) (1993) (1994) (1996) (1997) (1997) Hayashi (1997) (1999) 60 Ohtake (1991) 86 (1996) 89 (1997) 92 (1999) 95 (1993) 86 89 74 79 (1986)
M&A の経済分析：M&A はなぜ増加したのか
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 06-J-034 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 06-J-034 M&A の経済分析 :M&A はなぜ増加したのか 蟻川靖浩 宮島英昭 ( 早稲田大学 RIETI) 2006 年 4 月 要旨 1990 年代以降の M&A の急増の主要な要因は 産業や企業の成長性や収益性へのショックである とりわけ M&A を活発に行っている産業あるいは企業の特性としては
上場変更と株価：株主分散と流動性変化のインパクト
Merton Amihud and Mendelson NASDAQ JASDAQ JASDAQ JASDAQ QUICK [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] JASDAQ JASDAQ Merton
カルマンフィルターによるベータ推定（ ）
β TOPIX 1 22 β β smoothness priors (the Capital Asset Pricing Model, CAPM) CAPM 1 β β β β smoothness priors :,,. E-mail: [email protected]., 104 1 TOPIX β Z i = β i Z m + α i (1) Z i Z m α i α i β i (the
Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) ,
,, 2010 8 24 2010 9 14 A B C A (B Negishi(1960) (C) ( 22 3 27 ) E-mail:[email protected] E-mail:[email protected] E-mail:[email protected] 1 1 1 2 3 Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987)
時間割引：双曲割引と弱加法性
Discussion aper No. 666 June 2006 The Institute of Social and Economic Research Osaka University 6-1 Mihogaoka, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047, Japan Time Discounting: Declining Impatience and Interval Effect
Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C
27 [email protected] 27 4 3 Jorgenson Tobin q : Hayashi s Theorem Jordan Saddle Path. GDP % GDP 2. 3. 4.. Tobin q 2 2. Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F
Tran Thi Van Anh
Title Kobe University Repository : Kernel アジア債券市場整備の取り組みと債券市場の現状について (To Which Stage Has Asian Bond Market Achieved?) Author(s) 三重野, 文晴 / 清水, 聡 / [ トラン, ティンバンアン ] Citation 国民経済雑誌,204(6):25-43 Issue date
Attendance Demand for J-League õ Shinsuke KAWAI* and Takeo HIRATA* Abstract The purpose of this study was to clarify the variables determining the attendance in J-league matches, using the 2,699 J-league
日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析
196 2017 * ** ** 1 2 3 JEL Classification Codes D14, D15, E21 Keywords * 28 Hyun- Hoon Lee Robert Owen Kwanho Shin ** 29 196 An Empirical Analysis of the Saving Behavior of Elderly Households in Japan
59-1･2 鳥居昭夫・春日教測 .pwd
logit JEL Classifications: D10, M30, L82 Wilbur 2008 Shishikura et al. 2018 and de Gracia 2012 Bayraktaroglu et al. 2018 Carare and Zentner 2012 Carare and Zentner 2012 Train et al. 1987 Hendel 1999 Spence
Law and Economics Review vol.4,no.1(february 2009) 1998
Law and Economics Review vol.4,no.1(february 2009) 1998 1 500 No.93 1999114 2 195072119885021 19901991 3 Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 200720071024effective 1986 CFIUS2008831CFIUS web
表紙＿目次.PDF
JIL 2 1980 vol.3 15 3 1 3 15 18 IT 26 28 33 20 OECD 80 90 (1998) (2000) 2 Aghion et al. (1999) OECD 1970 1 2 70 1980 90 1.1 Kuznets U inverted U-shaped hypothesis GNP U 1 18901940 6 3 Kuznets(1955) (1963)
z.prn(Gray)
1. 90 2 1 1 2 Friedman[1983] Friedman ( ) Dockner[1992] closed-loop Theorem 2 Theorem 4 Dockner ( ) 31 40 2010 Kinoshita, Suzuki and Kaiser [2002] () 1) 2) () VAR 32 () Mueller[1986], Mueller ed. [1990]
日本の教育経済学：実証分析の展望と課題.pdf
ESRI Discussion Paper Series No69 by October 2003 Economic and Social Research Institute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 4 1 2 3 4 * 2003 8 7 B603 4 1 Schultz 1963 Becker 1964 human capital
Brennan, G. and Lomasky, L., Democracy and Decision : The Pure Theory of Electoral Preference, Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 1993. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller W. E., and Stokes, D. E., Elections
LA-VAR Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2)
LA-VAR 1 1 1973 4 2000 4 Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2) E-mail [email protected] 2 Toda, Hiro Y. and Yamamoto,T.(1995) 3
Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step
Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Stepwise Chow Test a Stepwise Chow Test Takeuchi 1991Nomura
濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G
濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G34 950-2181 2 8050 Tel. and fax: 025-262-6538 E-mail: [email protected]
J. JILA 64 (5), 2001
Comparison of the Value of Outdoor Recreation: A Case Study Applying Travel Cost Method and Contingent Valuation Method Yasushi SHOJI J. JILA 64 (5), 2001 J. JILA 64 (5), 2001 2) Trice, A. H. and Wood,
Vol.8 No (July 2015) 2/ [3] stratification / *1 2 J-REIT *2 *1 *2 J-REIT % J-REIT J-REIT 6 J-REIT J-REIT 10 J-REIT *3 J-
![Vol.8 No (July 2015) 2/ [3] stratification / *1 2 J-REIT *2 *1 *2 J-REIT % J-REIT J-REIT 6 J-REIT J-REIT 10 J-REIT *3 J-](/thumbs/91/104999279.jpg "Vol.8 No (July 2015) 2/ [3] stratification / *1 2 J-REIT *2 *1 *2 J-REIT % J-REIT J-REIT 6 J-REIT J-REIT 10 J-REIT *3 J-")
Vol.8 No.2 1 9 (July 2015) 1,a) 2 3 2012 1 5 2012 3 24, 2013 12 12 2 1 2 A Factor Model for Measuring Market Risk in Real Estate Investment Hiroshi Ishijima 1,a) Akira Maeda 2 Tomohiko Taniyama 3 Received:
PFI
PFI 23 3 3 PFI PFI 1 1 2 3 2.1................................. 3 2.2..................... 4 2.3.......................... 5 3 7 3.1................................ 7 3.2.................................
OECD Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. Mottla and Utkus Rooiji et al. Atkinson et al. MacFarland et al. Elton et al. Tang et al. Benartzi and Thaler Br
IFRS. OECD Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. Mottla and Utkus Rooiji et al. Atkinson et al. MacFarland et al. Elton et al. Tang et al. Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. /n Benartzi and Thaler n /n Benartzi
seminar0220a.dvi
1 Hi-Stat 2 16 2 20 16:30-18:00 2 2 217 1 COE 4 COE RA E-MAIL: [email protected] 2004 2 25 S-PLUS S-PLUS S-PLUS S-code 2 [8] [8] [8] 1 2 ARFIMA(p, d, q) FI(d) φ(l)(1 L) d x t = θ(l)ε t ({ε t }
合理的個人VS
VS - 1 - - 2 - Simon Khaneman,Tversky 2 15 1 3-3 - ...2...5...6...14...16...17...18 SIMON...19 Simon... 28... 37 KHANEMANTVERSKY...44 KhanemanTversky... 50 DE BONDTTHALER...52 SEN...58... 60...63...67...67...69...72
２
[email protected] http://www.econ.tohoku.ac.jp/~fukui/site.htm 200 7 Cookbook-style . (Inference) (Population) (Sample) f(x = θ = θ ) (up to parameter values) (estimation) 2 3 (multicolinearity)
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J- 9 -J-19 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J- 9 -J-19 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8630 03 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J- 9 -J-19 1999 6 * * [1999] *(E-mail:
Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right
Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): 54-76 Issue Date 1996-07 URL https://doi.org/10.14989/45083 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher
An Empirical Study of the Securities Firms' Dilemma on Financial Innovation through Diffusion of Internet Deals Yasugi Satoshi Bower, J. L., 1999, Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave,
2 / 24
2017 11 9 1 / 24 2 / 24 Solow, 1957 total factor productivity; TFP 5% 経済成長率の要因分解 4% 3% 2.68% 2.51% 2% 1% 0% 1.63% 1.50% 0.34% 0.42% 0.55% 0.97% 1.14% 0.86% 0.13% -0.59% -0.59% -0.09% 0.01% -1% 1970-80
わが国のレポ市場について―理論的整理と実証分析―
GCGC SC GCSC SC SC E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] GC general collateralscspecial collateral Griffiths and Winters GCFF Jordan and JordanDuffie matched book GC GC SC DuffieKrishnamurthy
