冷戦後の戦略環境変化とクリントン政権
|
|
|
- けいしょう さわい
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2 Paul D. Wolfowitz, Clinton s First Year, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 73, No. 15 (January/February, 1994)
3 3 91 G-7 G-7 4 G-7 5 (primacy) James Baker, America in Asia: Emerging Architecture for a Pacific Community, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 70, No. 5 (Winter 1991/92). 4 John G. Ikenderry, Slavaging the G7, Foreign Affairs,Vol.72, No.2 (Spring 1993) Barry R. Posen and Andrew L. Ross, Competing Visions for U.S. Grand Strategy, International Security, Vol. 21, No. 3 (Winter 1996/97), pp
4 APECNATO 7 8 (primacy) Robert Gilpen, The Politica l Economy o f International Relations (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987). 8 Robert Keohane, A ft er Hegemony: Cooperat i on and D i scord in the Wor l d Political Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984) Johan Galtung, A Structural Theory of Imperialism, Journal of Peace Research, No. 8 (1971). 38
5 11 12 i 11 George Liska, Imper al America: The International Politics of Primacy (Washington, D.C.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1967)
6 (It s the economy, stupid) 93 NSC NEC NEC USTR 2,000 1, ,000 2,000 1,500 1,400 40
7 13 MIT OMB NEC USTR CEA
8 (APEC) 93 APEC APEC
9 APEC APEC 14 (BUR) (EASR) BUR 14 U.S.-Japan Study Group of Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Rethinking Japan Policy (New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1993). 43
10 NATO BUR 16 BUR (2MRCs) BUR BUR 10 (EASI) U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Strategy for the 1990 s: The Regional Defense Strategy (Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense, January 1993). 16 U.S. Department of Defense, Force Structure Excerpts, Bottom - Up Review (Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense, September 1993). 17 New York Times, May 30, U.S. Department of Defense, A s t rateg i c Framework for the As i an Pacific Rim: Report to 44
11 93 EASI 19 BUR Congress (Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense, April 1990). 19 Bill Clinton, Building a New Pacific Community: Address to students and faculty of Waseda University, Tokyo, July 7, 1993, U.S. Department of States, Dispatch, Vol. 4, No. 28 (July 2, 1993), pp Winston Lord, Statement before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, March 31, 1993, U.S. Department of State, Dispatch Vol. 4, No. 14 (April 5, 1993), pp
12 APEC APEC ASEAN (ARF) (EAEC) (MFN) 89 MFN MFN ,000 (NPT) (IAEA) 46
13 94 ASEAN ASEAN APEC APEC (WTO) 96 (AFL-CIO) 301 WTO 47
14 (EASR) 21 EASR 95 EASR EASR 10 (linchpin) EASR engagement enlargement ASEAN (ARF) (TMD) BUR EASR U.S. Department of Defense, United States Security Strategy for the Eas t Asia-Pacifi c Region (Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense, February 1995). 48
15 , ABC
16 (CTBT)
17 ASEAN B
18 93 NSC USTR USTR 12 52
19 QDR 97 (QDR) 22 QDR 2015 (2MRCs) 10 BUR QDR 2015 (WMD) 2015 (shape) (respond) (prepare) WMD (SSC) (MTW) RMA BUR MRCs 22 U.S. Department of Defense, Repor t of the Quadrennial Defense Review (Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense, May 1997). 53
20 ,000 8,000 1,800 6,900 F FA-18E/F 1, (TMD) 2006 (NMD) 20 RMA 36 NMD MRCs BUR QDR 97 QDR TMD TMD The Council of Economic Advisers, Economic Report of the President (Washington D.C.: The Council of Economic Advisers, February 1997). 54
21 97 G-7 GDP , NTTKDD NTT OB 97 55
22 97 98 ASEAN 80 ASEAN Paul Krugman, The Myth of the Asia s Miracle, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 73, No. 6 (November/December 1994). 56
23 IMF , ,
24 (primacy) 25 (Security Primacy) (Economic Primacy) BUR QDR EASR Zbigniew Brzinski, The Grand Chessboard (New York: Harper Collins Publishers, Inc., Basic Books, 1997). 58
米軍の変革と在日米軍の再編
2003 1 5 4 9 Unified Combatant Command 2 3 30 10 4 5 1 2001 1,757 925 832 18,217 5,449 12,768 13,392 6,584 6,808 18,212 2,712 15,500 51,578 6 10 1 1986 38 1,200 2003 11 6 57,300 The International Institute
CSIS 4 the Asia-Pacific, or the Indo-Pacific region Asia s Democratic Security Diamond 7 11 sea-faring democracies Lake Beijing
1 nifty 2010 2012 3 4 2011 6 20 9 24 1 2 2. 2013 1 3 5 3 2-25- 1 2 23 CSIS 4 the Asia-Pacific, or the Indo-Pacific region 5 2 28 6 12 27 Asia s Democratic Security Diamond 7 11 sea-faring democracies Lake
核開発問題をめぐる中国の北朝鮮政策―2002年10月～2005年11月―
2005 9 2002 10 1 2 5 3 4 2005 9 19 3 2002 10 16 10 James A. Kelly 50 1994 10 4 1 -ISSUE BRIEF-No.406, 2002.12.5 2 2002 10 2003 4 3 7 2003 8 4 U.S. Department of State, Press Statement, Richard Boucher,
18 2 2016 2 5 6 Robert S. Ross 7 Charles L. Glaser 8 Susan Shirk 9 10 5 David Shambaugh, China Engages Asia: Reshaping the Regional Order Internationa
revisionist power status quo power 1 Aaron Friedberg 2 John J. Mearsheimer 3 4 David Shambaugh 2005 1 Alastair Iain Johnston, Is China a Status Quo Power? International Security, vol. 27, no. 4, (Spring
140 NDPG Defense of Japan 2010, pp. 2-3.
9 9/11 1 NDPG 10 NDPG 1976 1995 2004 2004 NDPG 2 NDPG 2010 12 2009 8 3 2011 3 11 1 Yasuaki Chijiwa, Japan s Security Outlook: Its Implications for the Defense Policy, in Asia Pacific Countries Security
Walter et al. 2009: 1 Helleiner 1994 Strange 1971: Gilpin 1987: -65 Strange b, 1998c,
54 2012 77 92 E. Yano Shuichi 2011 11 2008 40 19821997 1998 LTCM 2001 IT 2007 1970 International Political Economy Helleiner 1994 54 2012 Walter et al. 2009: 1 Helleiner 1994 Strange 1971: Gilpin 1987:
Microsoft Word - 博士論文要約（稲澤宏行）.doc
(norm) (Constructivism) material ( ) 1 2 3 (2001 ) ( ) (1949 ) (1949 ) 4 1 2005 241 2 2011 21 3 1949 4 (1949 ) 1 ( ) (2001 ) (1987 ) 1980 ( ) 1967 (1976 ) 5 ( ) 1 2 3 ( ) 1976 2 1 2 3 1976 (1967 ) 6 5
52 立教アメリカン スタディーズ Obama 2008:
オバマ政権と 変革 の課題 The Obama Administration's Agenda for "Change" 対外政策 特にラテンアメリカ政策を中心とした歴史的視点からの考察 An Analysis of Its Foreign, Particularly Latin American, Policy from a Historical Perspective 上村直樹 KAMIMURA
デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程
1991 2003 GDP....................................... http://www.stat.go.jp/ http://www.boj.or.jp/ GDP http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/ GDP - - - inflation targeting Krugman a IS-LM liquidity trap Krugman b Krugman
本組よこ／本組よこ＿古川＿Ｐ２８９－３１０
289 THEODORE McNELLY, Witness to the TWENTIETH CENTURY The Life Story of a Japan Specialist THEODORE McNELLY, Witness to the TWENTIETH CENTURY The Life Story of a Japan Specialist Xlibris Corporation Contemporary
untitled
Trade and Trade Finance in the 200809 Financial Crisis, IMF Working Paper WP/11/16., Understanding the Great Trade Collapse of 200809 and the Subsequent Trade Recovery, Economic Perspectives, 2Q/2011.
(2) (3) 2 vs vs (9) Edward Mansfield and Jack Snyder, Democratization and War, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 74, No
MEMOIRS OF SHONAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Vol. 39, No. 1, 2005 * Nationalism and National Security Masanori HASEGAWA* This article considers nationalism in terms of national security. Nationalism has been
1 1 20 20 2 1930 3 2 3 2 4 No. 578 2009 1 2 23
Matsuda Takeshi 1 D 3 2 No. 578 2009 1 2 22 1 1 20 20 2 1930 3 2 3 2 4 No. 578 2009 1 2 23 2 1946 1948 1950 2 2 1 5 6 2 3 4 7 2 2 8 19 19 1 1940 No. 578 2009 1 2 24 9 CFR a party-at-interest 10 11 12 13
第2章 海軍増強法とハルの対日政策の転換
196 197 3 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 1938 5 208 3 1 Edward S.Miller, War Plan Orange,Naval, Institute Press,1999,p.34. 1907 2 Admiral Emory Land Transcript, Columbia Oral History Project,Albion
Defense Transformation, Testimony of Andrew F. Krepinevich, Executive Director, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, United States Senate, Committee on Armed Services, April 9, 2002.
科学雑誌金田古田
4 1 2 petroleum 87.3 99.6 94.5 85.9 83.1 97.4 99.6 98.3 81.8 100.0 99.7 96.0 65.5 31.8 97.1 83.8 56.6 97.4 98.9 83.8 34.1 3.5 69.0 19.2 38.4 70.3 48.8 14.5 16.9 26.9 29.1 4.8 10.0 1.3 48.1 0.0 1.8 8.2
04_小松.indd
27 2012 p.41 57 Muammar Al-Qadhafi 40 2011 2 2 1000 4 1 3 19 NATO Operation Unified Protector 8 10 21 2 1 UN Doc., S/PV. 6490, February 25, 2011, pp. 2 4. 2 2012a 21 26 2012 73 42 3 4 1 3 8 100 24 4 NATO
5
8 1kg U-235 20 IAEA IAEA 7 4.3 2003 10 79 IAEA 1 2004 2 2 IAEA IAEA IAEA IAEA IAEA 2003 10 NPT NPT 3 2004 1 4 3 5 IAEA 8.1 8.1.1 IAEA IAEA 1957 IAEA 1 IAEA 2 IAEA 3 Iran s Pact: Full Cooperation, The New
43 2000 1964 65 possibilism 1 30 2 3 4 Development Projects Observed 5
43 2000 59 76 Shuichi YANO 1967A.O.Hirschman Development Projects Observed Brookings Institution: Washington, D.C.,1967. 1968 1970 30 1995 11 43 2000 1964 65 possibilism 1 30 2 3 4 Development Projects
Kyoto University * Filipino Students in Japan and International Relations in the 1930s: An Aspect of Soft Power Policies in Imperial Japan
47 2 2009 9 * Filipino Students in Japan and International Relations in the 1930s: An Aspect of Soft Power Policies in Imperial Japan KINOSHITA Akira* Abstract The purpose of this paper is to look into
Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003
266 Vol. 44 No. 3 I 序論 Mirrlees 1971 Diamond 1998 Saez 2002 Kaplow 2008 1 700 900 1, 300 1, 700 II III IV V II わが国の再分配の状況と国際比較 OECD Forster and Mira d Ercole 2005 2006 2001 Winter 08 267 図 1 図 2 2000 2
沖縄における米軍基地問題
50 1995 8 1995 9 SACO 17 1972 15 Key Stone of the Pacific 1996 12 36 SACO SACO 1995 1945 26 1 1952 1946 1949 21, 2001.10, p.95.,2000.5, p.48. R D, 2003.9,p.59., 2000.6, p.48. JCS 570/ 40 JCS R D p.27.
58 立教アメリカン スタディーズ
オバマ政権のアジア基軸戦略 Obama s Asia Pivot Strategy 1 その背景と展望 Its Background and Perspectives 藤木剛康 FJIKI Takeyasu 2011 11 17 2 Asia Pivot Strategy 1 2 3 4 1. Rikkyo American Studies 35 (March 2013) opyright 2013
戦後ハイパー・インフレと中央銀行
1945 8 1949 1958 1946 GHQ IMES No. 2002-J-35 2002 11 E-mail: [email protected] //2012.1 181 1. 1945 8 1949 1934 36 1949 220 1945 70 1949 1960 51 1975 200 3 1924 3 22 3 29 1970 1976 338 1979 16 1948
- March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
M&A IMF IMF gold tranche - March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade IMF IMF IMF GATT OECD OECD BITs. - March. U I = I (r m, i, Z * r m i Z * (= Z / Z) I / r m > I / i < I / Z *
国連安全保障理事会の拒否権―安保理改革問題に関連して―
2004 9 21 59 1 59 190 148 2 2003 3 2 15 3 2 1 1 4 24 1 39 41 42 5 5 5 5 1 59 2. 2004.10.4. 3 4 5 79 4,1980.10,pp.35-36. 1 27 6 15 9 9 5 7 (the
625†ific‚º”††j
Tamura Keiko T. 1 1965 8 11 2011 5 PAP: People s Action Party PAP PAP % 1960 PAP 1 1990 2011 5 2 PAP PAP 3 PAP PAP 2004 3 2006 10 15 20 4 PAP PAP No. 625 2013 10 45 1 1959 2011 1959 51 43 8 53.3 1963 51
表紙＿目次.PDF
JIL 2 1980 vol.3 15 3 1 3 15 18 IT 26 28 33 20 OECD 80 90 (1998) (2000) 2 Aghion et al. (1999) OECD 1970 1 2 70 1980 90 1.1 Kuznets U inverted U-shaped hypothesis GNP U 1 18901940 6 3 Kuznets(1955) (1963)
æ 1 2 3 rentier state s rent æ æ 1 Zanoyan 2 Gambill æ 3 æ 1987 Luciani Beblawi The Rentier State 4 Luciani Beblawi Luciani 40 æ World Development Indicators 10 1 UNDP 10 / æ æ No.37 2004 19 æ Sadowski
13 2002 8 ERINA 1 2 1 1. 1956 1960 19561960 1960 1970 197174 197579 1980 1980 1990 1980 1984 1980 1986 1990 2 1 199192 1 8 2 2000 9 11 2000 3 3 1 2 3 1 21 2001 2000 10 3 1995 2000 6 2001 2000 6 11 2000
3 RMA Williamson Murray 1 service 1 Geoffrey Till, Adopting the Aircraft Carrier: The British, American and Japanese Case Studies, in Military Innovation in the Interwar Period, ed. Williamson Murray and
(2005a) (2005) (2004-2005) (2004) (2003) 3 (2003) (2003) 2
Offshore Software Outsourcing in Japan 1 2 3 4 5 1 2001 500 3 60 10 MD IT 2003 50 2004 236-7 BPO 1 100 2 (2000) (2001) (2001) (2004) (2005) (2005b) (2005) (2005) 1 (2005a) (2005) (2004-2005) (2004) (2003)
商学 ６３‐３☆／６．山本
193 W. A. 1 2 3 1 2 WTO FTA TPP D. P. P. W. A. 194 2 3 Lewis 1954 1982, 1987 1999 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 A B 1987 119 1985 Krugman and Obstfeld 2009 19742006 3 W. A. 195 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 A a1 a2 * * i ai i 1, 2
佐藤昌介の女子高等教育論 : 北海道帝国大学における女性の入学をめぐって
Title 佐藤昌介の女子高等教育論 : 北海道帝国大学における女性の入学をめぐって Author(s) 山本, 美穂子 Citation 北海道大学大学文書館年報 = Annual Report of Hokkaido University Issue Date 2008-03-31 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/32514 Type bulletin (article)
野村資本市場研究所｜アジアの金融競争力（PDF）
2013 Spring 1. GDP 3 26% 2. 3. 4. GDP 1 GDP 2000 25.4% 2012 10 IMF 1 GDP 28.7%GDP 10.7% 20.3% 2000 2012 10 2 3 2000 2012 4.2 5.4 2 2000 14% 2012 26% GDP 2012 30 10 32003 11 2013 Spring 100% 2 90% 80% 70%
橡yaginuma.PDF
4 12 1290 43 550 (1) 1995 Seymour Martin Lipset and Earl Raab Jews and the New American Scene 30 200 50 40 1990 30 30 (2) 1654 23 (3) 1776 1000 2500 (4) 1820 1880 25 19 (5) 1928 420 250 2003 9 (6) E 18
8 06 NCTCNational Counterterrorism Center 46 89 074 07 07 1945 1952 1960 20028 1998 1974 Arms Control Today 1964 1945 20052 200610 20093 20095 20099 200911 Department of Defense Proliferation: Threat and
untitled
[ 研究ノート ] 4% 19 19 20 1997a 20 Mitchell, 2002: 123 208 1997b; 2008 2 1960 1980 Abdel-Fadil, 1975; Hansen, 1969; Radwan & Lee, 1986 Abdel-Fadil, 1980; 85 Assaad, 1997 2 Hopkins Hopkins & Westergaard, 1998:
72 10 7 5 1 2 3 1. Prevention/Mitigation Preparedness Response Relief/Recovery 6 5 2011 52-57 6 mitigation 23 6 25 35-36
71 1 2011 23 3 11 2 10 Operation Tomodachi UNOCHA SIPRI 3 4 1 2 23 6 25 3 SIPRI, The Effectiveness of Foreign Military Assets in Natural Disaster Response (Stockholm: SIPRI, 2008), p. 9. 4 Wilton Park
untitled
1 2 (1) (1962) 1972 3 (2) NGO 4 5 6 7 1955 1962 1962 8 1972 MIT 100 9 70 10 ? 11 1/4 3/4 3/4 1/4 5 1 12 1 1 4 FAO 3000 4 1 ODA 1/10 US 1/25 1/2 88 1/7( /WHO ) 12 1980-2000 GDP US 2006 13 Note: North includes
行動経済学の金融教育への応用の重要性
* 2 2 2010 3 3 2011 4 Princeton University, FINRA Investor Education Foundation2007 5 4 6 ASIC2011a disengagement less-than-optimal choices 7 5 8 2011 9 2011 6 10 OECD2005 11 12 2010 7 13 20112010 14 Benartzi20102011
