[2] ATMUKN [3] (ATMU ATMUKN)[4] ( ) X tr = f photo photo + f incoh incoh + f pair pair = E h 0 (2) h 0 E 1 f photo =1; X h 0 f incoh f pair =1;
|
|
|
- あまめ ひろなが
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ICRP90 (AP ) ICRP (photoelectric eect) (coherent scattering) (incoherent scattering) ( (pair creation) (triplet creation)) = photo + coh + incoh + pair (cm ;1 ) (1) (linear attenuation coecient) (mass attenuation coecient, m (cm 2 =g), ATMU) m N 0 (t cm) ( ) N 0 exp(;t) (Buildup Factor) (ATMUKN) ANS-6.4.3[1] 1
2 [2] ATMUKN [3] (ATMU ATMUKN)[4] ( ) X tr = f photo photo + f incoh incoh + f pair pair = E h 0 (2) h 0 E 1 f photo =1; X h 0 f incoh f pair =1; <h>+x h 0 =1; 2mec2 h 0 =1; 2mec2 +X h 0 for pair creation for triplet creation X: 1 X <h>: m e c 2 : X KX- X X 1993 Seltzer [5] 1961 Berger [6] Al Fe X Hubbell 1969 [7] 18 K Higgins NIST [8] Hubbell [5] [13] [9] 2 9 >= > (3)
3 K = E tr m : (4) E tr m (Gy=J/kg) (2) ( tr = cm 2 /g) (h 0 MeV/cm 2 ) K = tr = h 0 (MeV=g) = 1: ;10 tr = h 0 (Gy) (5) ICRP 74[10] (Table A.1) ICRU- 47[11] 1982 Hubbell [12] ( ) Seltzer g ( X Private communication Table A.1 1-g ) (Table A.21) 1995 Hubbell [13] g K a = 1995 Hubbell ( ) ICRP Hubbell ICRU 47Table A.1 1 ; g Higgins [8] 2.3 X X (collision loss) X (radiation loss) (E c ) " c = 800 (MeV) (6) Z +1:2 [14] X ( X g) en en = tr (1 ; g) (7) g X Hubbell [6, 15, 7, 16, 12, 8, 13] [13] NIST ( Physics and Reference Data) 3
4 Hubbell Higgins g 1 1 MeV Habbell 1.04 Ratio to µ (Hubbell ) en µ tr (Hubbell-1982) µ en (Hubbell -1982) µ tr (Higgins ) Photon Energy (MeV) 1: (Hubbell en (1995 ) ) (collision kerma) K C = en = h 0 (MeV=g) = 1: ;10 en = h 0 (Gy) (8) D = E m (9) E m 4
5 \ " D = K C = 1: ;10 en = h 0 (Gy) (10) Carlsson [17] 1 MeV g =0 10MeV 4% 2.4 1cm X = Q (11) m Q m X = e W (1 ; g)k = e W K C: (12) W J/C(=33.97 ev/e) [11] C=kg (R) 0 C 1 1cm 3 ( g) 1esu 1R = 2:58 10 ;4 C/kg W ICRU 47 Table A.1 \The exposure, X, is not accurately determined at energies above 3 MeV since there is signicant departure from electronic equilibrium." 3 MeV 5
6 1 1 ; g[11] [12, 13] Energy m m tr = 1 1 ; g[11] en =[12] tr =[8] en =[13] ATMU ATMUKN (MeV) (cm 2 /g) (cm 2 /g) (cm 2 /g) (cm 2 /g) (cm 2 /g) (cm 2 /g) Hubbell 1982 ICRU 47Table A.1 1 ; g 6
7 [18] X 2 [18] Primary Secondary Secondary Charged Energy Energy Particle Energy (E E ) c (E L ) c (E E ) u (E L ) u (E R ) u e ; e P (E E ) c : (E L ) c : (E E ) u : (E L ) u : (E R ) u : (E E ) c ; (E L ) c =1:4 ; 1:4 =0 K =0:5+0:5+0:5+0:5+1: :978 = 5:956 (MeV) (13) E E = (E E ) c ; (E L ) c +(E E ) u ; (E L ) u ; (E R ) u = 1:4 ; 1:4+10:0 ; 3:022 ; 1:022 = 5:956 (MeV) (14) X 3 X (E E ) c =(E L ) c =0 E tr > E X K C = D 7
8 Photoelectric effect Compton Scattering 6 7 Pair creation : ( )[18] 3: D 6= K [18] 6 MeV Al Al 4 EGS4[19] [7] [13] 1mm 1mm 5 1mm Al Al 1cm 5 8
9 Kerma Collision Kerma Absorbed Dose cm 2 MeV g Depth in Al (cm) 4: 6 MeV Al (E E ) C -(E L ) C (MeV cm 2 /g) MeV photon (E E ) C -(E L ) C (MeV cm 2 /g) MeV photon Depth in Al (cm) Depth in Al (cm) 5: 1mm ((E E ) C ) ((E L ) C ) 4 9
10 W W 100keV 3 [20] 5 MeV 2.5cm MeV 3 [20] (MeV) a (g cm ;2 ) a 5 (AP) 2 (AP) ICRP90 ( ) (AP) Hubbell[12] Seltzer g ICRP 74[10] Table A.1 ( cm ;2 ) (AP) 4 4 en =[13] (K C, ) (X, R) (AP) 6 ICRP (5), (8) (11) 10
11 ICRP 74 4 ICRP 47 11
12 4 (AP) Energy K 1 2 KC 3 X 3 MeV SvGy ;1 psvcm 2 SvGy ;1 msvr ; tr = 4 2 ICRU Report 47[11] Table A en =[13] 12
13 [1] Prepared byd.k.trubey, \New Gamma-Ray Buildup Factor Data for Point Kernel Calculations: ANS Standard Reference Data", NEUREG/CR-5740, ORNL/RSIC-49/RI(1991). [2] H. Hirayama and D. K. Trubey, \Eects of Incoherent and Coherent Scattering on the Exposure Buildup Factors of Low-Energy Gamma Rays", Nucl. Sci. Eng. 99(1988) [3] Y. Namito, S. Ban and H. Hirayama, \Eects of Linear Polarization and Doppler Broadening on the Exposure Buildup Factors of Low-Energy Gamma Rays", Nucl. Sci. Eng. 120(1995) [4] \Photon Interaction Cross Section Library", Radiation Shielding Information Center Data Package DLC-136/PHOTX, National Institute of Standards and Technology. [5] S. M. Seltzer, \Calculation of Photon Mass Energy-Transfer and Mass Energy-Absorption Coef- cients", Rad. Res. 136 (1993) [6] R. T. Berger, \The X- or Gamma-Ray Energy Absorption or Energy Transfer Coecient: Tabulation and Discussion", Rad. Res. 15(1961)1-29. [7] J. H. Hubbell, \Photon Cross Sections, Attenuation Coecients, and Energy Absorption Coecients from 10 kev to 100 GeV, NSRDS-NBS 29 (1969). [8] P. D. Higgins, F. H. Attix, J. H. Hubbell, S. M. Seltzer, M. J. Berger and C. H. Sibata, \Mass Energy-Transfer and Mass Energy-Absorption Coecients, Including In-Flight Positron Annihilation for Photon Energies 1 kev to 100 MeV, NISTIR 4812(1992). [9] Private communication. [10] ICRP Publication 74,\Conversion Coecients for use in Radiological Protection against External Radiation", Annals of ICRP 26, No.3/4(1996). [11] ICRU Report 47, \Measurement of Dose Equivalents from External Photon and Electron Radiations", 15 April [12] J. H. Hubbell,\Photon mass attenuation and energy absorption coecients from 1 kev to 20 MeV", Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 33(1982) [13] J. H. Hubbell and S. M. Seltzer, \Tables of X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coecients and Mass Energy-Absorption Coecients 1 kev to 20 MeV for Elements Z=1 to 92 and 48 Additional Substances of Dosimetric Interest", NSTIR 5632, (1995). [14] M. J. Berger and S. M. Seltzer, \Tables of Energy Losses and Ranges of Electrons and Positrons", NASA-SP-3012, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (1964). [15] J. H. Hubbell and M. J. Berger,\Sec. 4.1: Attenuation Coecients, Energy Absorption Coef- cients, and Related Quantities", in Engineering Compendium on Radiation Shielding, Vol. 1, R. G. Jaeger, ed. (Springer, Berlin), (1968). [16] J. H. Hubbell, \Photon Mass Attenuation and Mass Energy-Absorption Coecients for H, C, N, O, Ar, and Seven Mixtures from 0.1 kev to 20 MeV", Rad. Res. 70(1977)
14 [17] G. A. Charlsson, \Theoretical Basis for Dosimetry", in The Dosimetry of Ionizing Radiation, Vol. 1, pp.1-75, Academic Press, INC. (1985). [18] K. R. Kase, W. R. Nelson, \Concepts of Radiation Dosimetry", SLAC-153, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (1972) ibid. Pergamon Press, New York(1978). [19] W. R. Nelson, H. Hirayama and D. W. O.Rogers, \The EGS4 Code System", SLAC-265, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (1985). [20] G. F. Knoll, \Radiation Detection and Measurements", (John Wiley & Son),
白山羊さんの宿題.PDF
ICRU Report 60 Fundamental Quantities and Units for Ionizing Radiation (1998) dosimetric quantity exposurex kermak absorbed dosed 1) fluenceφ hν 1. ρ x Φ/Φ { Φ/Φ}/{ρ x} mass attenuation coefficient µ/ρ
加速器の基本概念 V : 高周波加速の基礎
.... V : KEK [email protected] http://research.kek.jp/people/takata/home.html 2015 2015 4 16 1 2 (1) 3 (2) 4 5 6 ERL: Energy Recovery Linac LCLS: Linac Coherent Light Source LC : µ-µ Koji Takata (KEK)
人 々ばかりでなく 被 曝 時 年 齢 10~19 歳 のグループにおいても 減 少 しつつあるということである 20 歳 以
O~O~O~O~O~O~O~OOOO~O~O~OOOO~OOOO~OO O~~~O~O~O~O~OOOO~O~O~O~OOOOO~~ 人 々ばかりでなく 被 曝 時 年 齢 10~19 歳 のグループにおいても 減 少 しつつあるということである 20 歳 以 .~ 1) Y. Shimizu, H. Kato and W. J. Schull: Life span study report
X線分析の進歩36 別刷
X X X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis on Environmental Standard Reference Materials with a Dry Battery X-Ray Generator Hideshi ISHII, Hiroya MIYAUCHI, Tadashi HIOKI and Jun KAWAI Copyright The Discussion Group
X CT - - ( ) ( ) CT Image Reconstruction Algorithm to Reduce Metal Artifact - Metal Extraction and Non-Metal Interpolation of Sinogram - Toru KANO, Mi
X CT - - ( ) ( ) CT Image Reconstruction Algorithm to Reduce Metal Artifact - Metal Extraction and Non-Metal Interpolation of Sinogram - Toru KANO, Michihiko KOSEKI, Hirohisa MORIKAWA Shinshu University,
第5章 処分事業の概要
2003 12 17 (NUMO) 1 - - 2 - - 3 (1/7) 10 4 2020 40000 4 (2/7) 5 (3/7) 6 (4/7) IAEA 1995 The Principles of Radioactive Waste Management, Safety Series No. 111-F, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna,
NUMERICAL CALCULATION OF TURBULENT OPEN-CHANNEL FLOWS BY USING A MODIFIED /g-e TURBULENCE MODEL By Iehisa NEZU and Hiroji NAKAGA WA Numerical calculat
NUMERICAL CALCULATION OF TURBULENT OPEN-CHANNEL FLOWS BY USING A MODIFIED /g-e TURBULENCE MODEL By Iehisa NEZU and Hiroji NAKAGA WA Numerical calculation techniques of turbulent shear flows are classified
W 1983 W ± Z cm 10 cm 50 MeV TAC - ADC ADC [ (µs)] = [] (2.08 ± 0.36) 10 6 s 3 χ µ + µ 8 = (1.20 ± 0.1) 10 5 (Ge
22 2 24 W 1983 W ± Z 0 3 10 cm 10 cm 50 MeV TAC - ADC 65000 18 ADC [ (µs)] = 0.0207[] 0.0151 (2.08 ± 0.36) 10 6 s 3 χ 2 2 1 20 µ + µ 8 = (1.20 ± 0.1) 10 5 (GeV) 2 G µ ( hc) 3 1 1 7 1.1.............................
PowerPoint プレゼンテーション
テーマ 1: 福島復興に向けた取り組みと放射線防護場の課題 Ⅲ 土壌に分布する放射性セシウムによる 公衆の被ばく線量換算係数 日本原子力研究開発機構 放射線防護研究グループ 佐藤大樹 2014/12/19 保物セミナー 2014 1 発表の内容 研究の背景 研究の目的 計算方法 計算結果 まとめ 2014/12/19 保物セミナー 2014 2 防護量 (Sv) 等価線量 H 実効線量 E 放射線加重係数
EQUIVALENT TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE FOR ISLANDING DETECTION METHODS OF SYNCHRONOUS GENERATOR -REACTIVE POWER PERTURBATION METHODS USING AVR OR SVC- Ju
EQUIVALENT TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE FOR ISLANDING DETECTION METHODS OF SYNCHRONOUS GENERATOR -REACTIVE POWER PERTURBATION METHODS USING AVR OR SVC- Jun Motohashi, Member, Takashi Ichinose, Member (Tokyo
JAMSTEC Rep. Res. Dev., Volume 12, March 2011, 27 _ 35 1,2* Pb 210 Pb 214 Pb MCA 210 Pb MCA MCA 210 Pb 214 Pb * 2
JAMSTEC Rep. Res. Dev., Volume 12, March 2011, 27 _ 35 1,2* 1 1 1 1 210 Pb 210 Pb 214 Pb MCA 210 Pb MCA MCA 210 Pb 214 Pb 2010 10 4 2010 12 10 1 2 * 237-0061 2-15 046-867-9794 [email protected] 27 210
PowerPoint Presentation
2010 KEK (Japan) (Japan) (Japan) Cheoun, Myun -ki Soongsil (Korea) Ryu,, Chung-Yoe Soongsil (Korea) 1. S.Reddy, M.Prakash and J.M. Lattimer, P.R.D58 #013009 (1998) Magnetar : ~ 10 15 G ~ 10 17 19 G (?)
Undulator.dvi
X X 1 1 2 Free Electron Laser: FEL 2.1 2 2 3 SACLA 4 SACLA [1]-[6] [7] 1: S N λ [9] XFEL OHO 13 X [8] 2 2.1 2(a) (c) z y y (a) S N 90 λ u 4 [10, 11] Halbach (b) 2: (a) (b) (c) (c) 1 2 [11] B y = n=1 B
Corrections of the Results of Airborne Monitoring Surveys by MEXT and Ibaraki Prefecture
August 31, 2011 Corrections of the Results of Airborne Monitoring Surveys by MEXT and Ibaraki Prefecture The results of airborne monitoring survey by MEXT and Ibaraki prefecture released on August 30 contained
(Blackbody Radiation) (Stefan-Boltzmann s Law) (Wien s Displacement Law)
( ) ( ) 2002.11 1 1 1.1 (Blackbody Radiation).............................. 1 1.2 (Stefan-Boltzmann s Law)................ 1 1.3 (Wien s Displacement Law)....................... 2 1.4 (Kirchhoff s Law)...........................
42 3 u = (37) MeV/c 2 (3.4) [1] u amu m p m n [1] m H [2] m p = (4) MeV/c 2 = (13) u m n = (4) MeV/c 2 =
3 3.1 3.1.1 kg m s J = kg m 2 s 2 MeV MeV [1] 1MeV=1 6 ev = 1.62 176 462 (63) 1 13 J (3.1) [1] 1MeV/c 2 =1.782 661 731 (7) 1 3 kg (3.2) c =1 MeV (atomic mass unit) 12 C u = 1 12 M(12 C) (3.3) 41 42 3 u
Huawei G6-L22 QSG-V100R001_02
G6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 2 3 17 4 5 18 UI 100% 8:08 19 100% 8:08 20 100% 8:08 21 100% 8:08 22 100% 8:08 ********** 23 100% 8:08 Happy birthday! 24 S S 25 100% 8:08 26 http://consumer.huawei.com/jp/
1. Precise Determination of BaAl2O4 Cell and Certification of the Formation of Iron Bearing Solid Solution. By Hiroshi UCHIKAWA and Koichi TSUKIYAMA (
1. Precise Determination of BaAl2O4 Cell and Certification of the Formation of Iron Bearing Solid Solution. By Hiroshi UCHIKAWA and Koichi TSUKIYAMA (Central Research Laboratory, Onoda Cement Co., Ltd.,
52-2.indb
Jpn. J. Health Phys., 52 (2) 55 60 (2017) DOI: 10.5453/jhps.52.55 * 1 * 2 * 2 * 3 * 3 2016 10 28 2017 3 8 Enhancement of Knowledge on Radiation Risk Yukihiko KASAI,* 1 Hiromi KUDO,* 2 Masahiro HOSODA,*
表紙4_1/山道 小川内 小川内 芦塚
1 2008.1Vol.23 2008.1Vol.23 2 2008.1Vol.23 3 2008.1Vol.23 4 5 2008.1Vol.23 2008.1Vol.23 6 7 2008.1Vol.23 2008.1Vol.23 8 9 2008.1Vol.23 10 2008.1Vol.23 11 2008.1Vol.23 12 2008.1Vol.23 Center 13 2008.1Vol.23
untitled
Quantitative Risk Assessment on the Public Health Impact of Pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Raw Oyster 1 15 5 23 48 2 21 1 16 1 16 1 11 3 1 3 4 23 1 2 16 12 16 5 6 Hazard IdentificationExposure
DocuPrint C5450 ユーザーズガイド
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 10 1 11 1 12 1 13 1 14 1 15 1 16 17 1 1 18 1 19 1 20 1 21 1 22 1 23 1 24 1 25 1 26 27 1 1 28 1 29 1 30 1 31 1 2 12 13 3 2 10 11 4 9 8 7 6 5 34 24 23 14 15 22 21 20 16 19 18 17 2 35
Bethe-Bloch Bethe-Bloch (stopping range) Bethe-Bloch FNAL (Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory) - (SciBooNE ) SciBooNE Bethe-Bloch FNAL - (SciBooNE
21 2 27 Bethe-Bloch Bethe-Bloch (stopping range) Bethe-Bloch FNAL (Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory) - (SciBooNE ) SciBooNE Bethe-Bloch FNAL - (SciBooNE ) Bethe-Bloch 1 0.1..............................
「諸雑公文書」整理の中間報告
30 10 3 from to 10 from to ( ) ( ) 20 20 20 20 20 35 8 39 11 41 10 41 9 41 7 43 13 41 11 42 7 42 11 41 7 42 10 4 4 8 4 30 10 ( ) ( ) 17 23 5 11 5 8 8 11 11 13 14 15 16 17 121 767 1,225 2.9 18.7 29.8 3.9
0.45m1.00m 1.00m 1.00m 0.33m 0.33m 0.33m 0.45m 1.00m 2
24 11 10 24 12 10 30 1 0.45m1.00m 1.00m 1.00m 0.33m 0.33m 0.33m 0.45m 1.00m 2 23% 29% 71% 67% 6% 4% n=1525 n=1137 6% +6% -4% -2% 21% 30% 5% 35% 6% 6% 11% 40% 37% 36 172 166 371 213 226 177 54 382 704 216
10 117 5 1 121841 4 15 12 7 27 12 6 31856 8 21 1983-2 - 321899 12 21656 2 45 9 2 131816 4 91812 11 20 1887 461971 11 3 2 161703 11 13 98 3 16201700-3 - 2 35 6 7 8 9 12 13 12 481973 12 2 571982 161703 11
2
2013 Vol.18 No.2 3 24 25 8 22 2 23 26 9 15 20 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 point1 point 2 point3 point4 10 11 point1 point 2 point 3 point 4 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 http://www.taishukan.co.jp/kateika/ 21 22 23 24
SPECT(Single Photon Emission Computer Tomography ) SPECT FWHM 3 4mm [] MPPC SPECT MPPC LSO 6mm 67.5 photo electron 78% kev γ 4.6 photo electron SPECT
3 SPECT SJ SPECT(Single Photon Emission Computer Tomography ) SPECT FWHM 3 4mm [] MPPC SPECT MPPC LSO 6mm 67.5 photo electron 78% kev γ 4.6 photo electron SPECT 9ch MPPC array 3 3 9 3 3 9.mm(sigma) . SPECT..................................................................3............
01_辻
20 EBSD 2008.11.28 scanning electron microscope: SEM EBSD electron back scattering diffraction [1-4] 10 EBSD anisotropy polycrystal orientation texture EBSD EBSD EBSD EBSD Table 1 EBSD Table 1-10 mmφ
線量測定の基礎
歯科放射線 2015;55(1):30-34 健児 The Basis of Dosimetry for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology The Doses for Diagnostic Refernce Levels Kenji Sato Dental Radiology 2015; 55(1): 30-34 Key words: Dosimetry, Diagnostic
1) K. J. Laidler, "Reaction Kinetics", Vol. II, Pergamon Press, New York (1963) Chap. 1 ; P. G. Ashmore, "Catalysis and Inhibition of Chemical Reactio
1) K. J. Laidler, "Reaction Kinetics", Vol. II, Pergamon Press, New York (1963) Chap. 1 ; P. G. Ashmore, "Catalysis and Inhibition of Chemical Reactions", Butterworths, London (1963) Chap. 7, p. 185. 2)
B 1 B.1.......................... 1 B.1.1................. 1 B.1.2................. 2 B.2........................... 5 B.2.1.......................... 5 B.2.2.................. 6 B.2.3..................
untitled
27.2.9 TOF-SIMS SIMS TOF-SIMS SIMS Mass Spectrometer ABCDE + ABC+ DE + Primary Ions: 1 12 ions/cm 2 Molecular Fragmentation Region ABCDE ABCDE 1 15 atoms/cm 2 Molecular Desorption Region Why TOF-SIMS?
スライド 1
Matsuura Laboratory SiC SiC 13 2004 10 21 22 H-SiC ( C-SiC HOY Matsuura Laboratory n E C E D ( E F E T Matsuura Laboratory Matsuura Laboratory DLTS Osaka Electro-Communication University Unoped n 3C-SiC
positron 1930 Dirac 1933 Anderson m 22Na(hl=2.6years), 58Co(hl=71days), 64Cu(hl=12hour) 68Ge(hl=288days) MeV : thermalization m psec 100
positron 1930 Dirac 1933 Anderson m 22Na(hl=2.6years), 58Co(hl=71days), 64Cu(hl=12hour) 68Ge(hl=288days) 0.5 1.5MeV : thermalization 10 100 m psec 100psec nsec E total = 2mc 2 + E e + + E e Ee+ Ee-c mc
i ii iii 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 1 x = n n x i i= 1 2 s X = s X n ( x x) i 2 2 i= 1 s X = n 1 g 1 n = ( n 1)( n 2) n i= 1 x i x s 3 24 g 2 n n( n + 1) x = ( n 1)( n
1 3 1.1 PET..................................... 3 1.1.1......................................... 3 1.1.2 PET................................. 4 1.2..
21 PET 06S2037G 2010 3 1 3 1.1 PET..................................... 3 1.1.1......................................... 3 1.1.2 PET................................. 4 1.2........................................
