Taro10-プレス用概要（ハイブリッ
|
|
|
- ふじよし かいじ
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 10
2
3
4
5 ATS
6 How For What 1
7 13 2
8
9 12 7 4
10 NPM NPM 5
11 NPM 6
12 MBO: Management by Objectives 7
13 State of Iowa (1998) Budgeting for Results Handbook. SMART Specific Measurable Ambitious Realistic/Relevant Timed Performance Measurement 8
14 1960 DC Joseph S. Wholey Harry P. Hatry Reinventing Government 1994 GPRA 4 (2001) 1(2). William R. Shadish, Thomas D. Cook and Laura C. Leviton (1991) Foundations of Program Evaluation: Theories and Practice, Sage Publication. 9
15 GPRA GPRAGovernment Performance & Results Act of Strategic Plan Mission Strategic Goals Performance Plan Performance Goals Performance Measures DOT DOT Strategic Plan DOT Performance Plan/Report USAID Direct Agreed Practical Reliable Objective Useful ASPA (2000) (2001) 10
16 Policy Analysis Policy Assessment Regulatory Impact Assessment 2001 Regulatory Reform Act of Compliance Cost Consultation 100 DTLR DTLR 11
17 Program Evaluation GAO GAO TBS Results for Canadians RMAFResults-based Management and Accountability Frameworks RMAF RMAF 2 Relevance= Success= Cost-Effectiveness= Transport Canada 5 56 TBS 12
18 GAO GAO with/without U.S. GAO (1998) Performance Measurement and Evaluation: Definitions and Relationships, GAO/GGD
19
20 15 PI ( ) ( )
21
22 8 5 17
23 13 ODA Policy Issue 18
24 H1292.6% H18100% H124% H1870% H747% H17100%
25 20
26 ,
27
28 ATS
29 IT 107 EDI IT 109 IT 110 ETC 79 ITS
30
31
32 27
33
34
35 NPM NPM
36 10 PI Family of Measures 10 strategy mission vision 2002 GPRA strategic objectives corporate management strategy 31
37 Porter Michael E. Porter (2002) What is Strategy? Harvard Business Review OnPoint Article. (Charan & Colvin 1999) 2001 TQMTotal Quality Management TQM (Government Executive) TQM 32
38 Ram Charan and Geoffrey Colvin (1999), Why CEOs fail Fortune June 21. (2001) Government Executive, Fdederal Performance Report Card, 11 GPRA (The President s Management Agenda) GPRA Performance Budgeting 10 OMB 33
39 2 26 NSF Office of Management and Budget, U.S. Budget FY GPRA 10 34
40 12 12 BSC Balanced Scorecard Robert Kaplan David Norton 1996 Strategy-Focused Organization JP GE
41 cascading KPI MBO Organization & Change Framework Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton (2002) Strategy-Focused Organization, HBS Publishing 36
42 13 37
43 (1) (2) 38
44 14 Participatory Evaluation ODA 14 5, NPO 39
45
46
47 42
48
49 44
50
51
52
53
54
55 GAP
56
57
58 GAP
59 ()
60
61
62
63 ,500ha / GAP
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98 2,000 CO2 CO ) 60% % 13 7 / 860 kl 17 60% 30% ( GAP) ( ) 17 60% ( )
99 2,000 COP7 14 CO2 1/ % CO2 90% 10
100
101
102
103
104 7
105
106
107
108
109
110 ) ) ) 18 ) 17
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118 , ,384 GAP
119
120
121
122 1 ha
123
124 ( ) 25) 105)
125
126 12 42
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138 20 11
139 11 11
140 VFM PFI VFM
141
142
143
144 2
145
146 1 14 2,
147
148
149 ,791 14
150 ,588 14
151 100 ha H H ,588
152 500m 3 300m 3,000m 3 1,000m ,588
153 ,500
154 ( ) ( ) 14 5,
155
156
157
158
159 ()
160
161 ,
162 (1) 14 (2) 13 (3)
163
164 2, COP ,857 2,900 2, ( 2 )
165 14
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174 1
175
176
177 ( )
178
179
180
181
182
183 .2.(2)2.
184
185
186 ATS 10 B/C
187 SMART 116
188
189
190 119
191 120
192
193 ,
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233 1,
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270 IT ALOS PRISM VLBI GPS GIS 199
271
272 NPM 1993 GPRA GPRA GPRA 14 3 DOT HUD GAO GPRA
273 NPM NPM NPM 202
274 14 1 Q&A NPO WAAV NPM 203
275 NPM
ｺﾋﾟｰ (7) ～ ＰＤＦ.ren
BSC Balanced Scorecard BSC Robert S. Kaplan David P. Norton Kaplan&Norton BSC BSC BSC BSC (C) BSC BSC Kaplan & Norton BSC Kaplan & Norton,, p.,, p. BSC BSCBSC BSC BSC BSC BSC..,, pp. - BSC BSC BSC BSCKaplan
本文／ＹＡＺ１７２Ｐ
2004 2005 2006 2007 Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of Treadway Commission COSO 1992 Internal Control-Integrated Framework COSO 1 1 COSO 2009 7 27 2009 9 11 21 1956 1980 1986 MBA 1980 2006 1990 1993
自治体への戦略マネジメントモデルの適用 SWOT分析を中心に
ESRI Discussion Paper Series No.157 by February 2006 Economic and Social Research Institute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan 1 E-mail:[email protected] -2 - Application of strategic management model
管理会計によるインタンジブルズ管理のアプローチ
The purpose of this paper is to describe the expected role of management accounting in the research of intangibles specialized in corporate reputation and reputation management. The reason for this study
行動経済学の金融教育への応用の重要性
* 2 2 2010 3 3 2011 4 Princeton University, FINRA Investor Education Foundation2007 5 4 6 ASIC2011a disengagement less-than-optimal choices 7 5 8 2011 9 2011 6 10 OECD2005 11 12 2010 7 13 20112010 14 Benartzi20102011
1 マネジメント コントロール システムと KPI の機能 森口毅彦 キーワード KPI CSF BSC 1. はじめに Kaplan Robert S. Kaplan Norton David P. Norton BSC Balanced Scorecard KPI Key Performance
マネジメント コントロール システムと KPI の機能 森口毅彦. 1 マネジメント コントロール システムと KPI の機能 森口毅彦 キーワード KPI CSF BSC 1. はじめに Kaplan Robert S. Kaplan Norton David P. Norton BSC Balanced Scorecard KPI Key Performance Indicators BSC BSC
墓地報告書togo.PDF
23 65 27.8%(3,456 ) 2020 150 16 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 1 1 1 1 2 2 4 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 3 5 0 6 2 3 16 68 69 70 71 72
Q A Q A 1
IHI Report Q A Q A 1 Q A Q A To Our Shareholders 2 706 803 42 9 1,030 790 66 17 1,894 1,716 55 103 3 Business Review by Segment 1,350 57 45 1,310 704 34 16 755 103 31 16 41 763 16 10 554 4 Performance
環境マネジメントシステムが抱える課題と対応策――ISO14001の取り組み現場から
SJRM S J R M R i s k R e v i e w 9 ISO 14001 Issues and Actions on Environmental Management Systems (EMS): From the Consulting Field of the ISO 14001 Environmental Management System: EMS 1 EMS ISO 14001
中国市場における日系・欧米系企業の戦略比較
No.24 2002 7 Abstract In this paper, I review the trade conflict between Japan and China, which happened in 2001. The import 3 list of articles (car, portable telephone, air conditioner) from Japan to
5 10 10-1 - 5 20-2 - - 3 - - 4 - 22 6 30 10 12 22 7 8 1 30 4 30 1 22 7 14 10 12 20 22 7 21 1 30 3 30-5 - - 6 - - 7 - 11 9 9 14 10 9 15 7 9 10 NPO - 8 - - 15 - - 16 - - 17 - - 19 - - 20 - - 21 - - 22
e? e? h? h? h? h? h? h? e??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee?? e??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??
15 6 9 3 18 9 1 17 244 1 15 7-1 - - 2 - ( 244 2 8 ) 17.9.5No35 17 7-3 - 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (1,795) 38.7% (2,844) 61.3% 34.1 (329) 83.4 (131) 65.9 (635) 16.6 (26) 38.2 (1265) 61.8 (2048) (N=4639) 34.1
3.3.. Copyright 007 by Kenji OHTOMO 21 Evaluation? Evaluation Logic Model Performance Measurement Program Evaluation 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 40 50
村本 孜７１‐８９／７１‐８９
MERITUM RICARDIS OECD https://www.jicpa knk.ne.jp/download/image/index.html EU (intellectual capital rating) BCP OECD IR ex.) ex.) ex.) ex.) http://www.meti.go.jp/policy/intellectual_assets/index.htm (intellectual
サービスマネジメントのメソドロジ
Outsourcing Service Management Methodologies IT IT IT Abstract In today s complicated outsourcing business environment, with its diverse service scope, the quality of service provided by outsourcers may
[http://www.measuredhs.com/aboutsurveys/dhs/ start.cfm] Black, T. R., Namwadda, R., Mugambe, J., Walugembe, E. & Esanu, C. (1999). Education growth in Uganda. International Journal of Educational Development,
金融規制における課徴金制度の抑止効果と法的課題
D&O D&O E-mail: [email protected] / /2015.7 143 1. 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 1 2005 13 2 3 6 2 172 2007 31 2 34 21 2 4 2005 40 172 2 1 1 25 3 28 24 301 5 175 1 2 6 2005 13 144 /2015.7 7 8 fairness retribution
Microsoft Word - 荳ｭ蟲ｶ諱ｵ
11 1 Porter Barney Barney Barney 2013 4 1 2004 1995 TDL 2 1998 2 2010 Porter 1980 Wernerfelt 1984 Barney 1986 Rumelt 1984 isolating mechanism Dierickx and Cool 1989 2010 1990 Praharad and Hamel 1990 Hamel
FD FD
FD FD accountability accountability computare responsabilité responsibility responsabilidad Verantwortlichkeit S O MMT Machine Manageable Test MMT Monkey Manageable Test human potential VS Transforming
1950 1970 1990 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 6,788 7,123 5,384 4,915 4,908 4,927 4,895 4,919 4,936 4,927 4,897 5,010 5,008 1,456 1
1950 1970 1990 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 6,788 7,123 5,384 4,915 4,908 4,927 4,895 4,919 4,936 4,927 4,897 5,010 5,008 1,456 1,616 927 824 826 821 813 808 802 803 801 808 806 18,483
...1 GRC...2 GRC...6 SAP GRC...8 SAP GRC Risk Management... 9 SAP GRC Process Control SAP GRC Access Control iii Insights on governa
Insights on governance, risk and compliance SAP GRC GRC: Governance, Risk, and Compliance ...1 GRC...2 GRC...6 SAP GRC...8 SAP GRC Risk Management... 9 SAP GRC Process Control... 10 SAP GRC Access Control...
ＧＤＰギャップと潜在成長率
2003 output gap 80 1 20 90 20 70 2 1 2 output gap potential output 1 2 (2001) 3 potential rate of growth 2000 Meyer (2000) European Central Bank: (1999b) 2002 10 4 3 (2000) 4 4 () 5 5 5 6 () () 7 Total
2 1 図 2 連邦政府と地方との役割分担 ( 出典 :FEMA) 2 2. 米国の危機管理システムの変遷 1950 Disaster Relief Act Civil Defense Act National Flood Insurance Act
特集 : 大規模災害と社会保障 Ⅱ 災害発生時における危機対応システム - 米国の事例に学ぶ - 牧紀男 要約本稿は 被害軽減 (preparedness) を中心とした危機対応から 被害抑止 (mitigation) 災害復興 (recovery) までも含めた総合的な防災対策を構築していっている米国の事例から 東日本大震災の教訓を踏まえた新たな日本の危機管理対策のあり方について考えるものである
maiji2007_cover_j_0907
27 CORPORATE PHILOSOPHY THE MEIJI DAIRIES GROUP CONTRIBUTES TO A HEALTHY AND HAPPY DAILY LIFE FOR OUR CUSTOMERS BY OFFERING NEW LEVELS OF VALUE IN FOOD. CONTENTS 2 4 6 1 1 11 12 13 14 16 18 19 2 22 23
Research on Academic Degrees and University Evaluation The Chronicle of Higher Education Chronicle Analytical Perspectives Research Centers Directory Research Centers Directory Administrative Policies
140 NDPG Defense of Japan 2010, pp. 2-3.
9 9/11 1 NDPG 10 NDPG 1976 1995 2004 2004 NDPG 2 NDPG 2010 12 2009 8 3 2011 3 11 1 Yasuaki Chijiwa, Japan s Security Outlook: Its Implications for the Defense Policy, in Asia Pacific Countries Security
BSC 4 BSC 2006 BSC BSC BSC BSC SWOT BSC BSC
19 20 1 BSC 4 BSC 2006 BSC BSC BSC BSC SWOT BSC BSC 20 1 7 19 1 ...1...5 BSC...7 BSC... 13... 15... 18 3 A... 23... 24 BSC... 24 BSC... 25... 25... 32 B... 33... 34 BSC... 34... 34... 39 C... 40... 41...
株式会社幸楽苑
35th Business Report http://www.kourakuen.co.jp/ To Our Shareholders Management Report CONTENTS 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 11 14 15 16 17 1 2 Management Strategy 3 4 5 6 Management Strategy Commentary Information 7
CSIS 4 the Asia-Pacific, or the Indo-Pacific region Asia s Democratic Security Diamond 7 11 sea-faring democracies Lake Beijing
1 nifty 2010 2012 3 4 2011 6 20 9 24 1 2 2. 2013 1 3 5 3 2-25- 1 2 23 CSIS 4 the Asia-Pacific, or the Indo-Pacific region 5 2 28 6 12 27 Asia s Democratic Security Diamond 7 11 sea-faring democracies Lake
PDF.....p
5 NGO 2006 2010 ODA JICA JBIC AusAid 118 5 VAMSEPII 2004 2007 VAMSEPII 1 NPO 2 3 4 1 NGO 119 1980 ODA 1 ALNAP 1 FASID http://www.fasid. or.jp/chosa/oda/kenkyukai.html 120 5 Active Learning Network for
商学 ６４‐５☆／２１．太田原
694 TQC TQC 1 2 3 1TQC 2 3SQC TQC 4 Shimokawa1992 TPS Nelson and Winter, pp.3 22 1978 1985 TPS 1992 TQC 695 Total Quality Control TQC TPS TQC 2003 TQC 2012TQC 1988 TQC 1 TQC TQC 2 50 1950 70 TQC 2 TQC