|
|
|
- ふじよし のあき
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2
3
4 a
5
6
7
8 p.
9 a a a
10 a
11 ILO International LaborOrganization b Lastaccessed, April,,
12 b a
13 China National Committee On Aging, Pension insurance coverage to double by Xinhuanews, December,. Lastaccessed: April., b a
14 insurance.cagold.org, Last accessed date: Lastaccessed, April,..
15 Lastaccessed, April,,p.
16 OECD OECD OECD OECD
17 M. Feldstein.
18 p. p.
19 p. p.
20 p. p.
21 p.
22 p. p.
23 p.worldbank
24 p. p.. p.
25 p. p.
26 p. WorldBank PiggottandBei Feldstein Sin p.
27 Sin thepension Reform Option Simulation Toolkit PROSTSin implicit pension debt;
28 financinggap: GDP GDP GDP GDP Sinfinancing gap GDP SinGDP
29 GDP GDP GDP GDP GDP EU
30
31 GDP GDP
32
33 Sin Sin
34 WeiWu BreakingNewshttp:// LastAccessed, April,
35 p. p..
36 p. p.
37
38 b p. p. p.p. p. p. p. b
39 p.
40 p.. p. p.. p.
41 M. Feldstein p.. pp.
42 PIMCO pp.. p.
43 p.. p.. Sin p.vii p.
44 p. p.
45 pp.
46
47 a b b MartinFeldstein, SocialSecurityPensionReforminChina, NationalBureauofEconomic Research, NBERWorkingPaper,No. Piggott, J., andl.bei, PensionReformandtheDevelopmentofPensionSystems: An EvaluationofWorldBankAssistance, BackgroundPaper, ChinaCountryStudy,Indevendent Evaluation Group, World Bank. Sin,Y.,, China:Pension Liabilities and Reform Options for Old Age Insurance, WorkingPaperSeries,No., WorldBank. WorldBank, China-Pensionsystemreform, WorldDevelopmentSources,WDS.
48 JRI Vol.No.. Working Paper No.. Online No. No.. RIM Vol.No.. EU
49
Vol.9No.22012
6 21 2 21 8 7 118 Vol.9No.22012 6 2 3 1 10 10 1 13 1 13 1320 1956 1961 1977 21 8 1979 1981 1982 2011 2003 20062011 Vol.9No.22012 119 1 23 8 21 1 1 24 20 22 18 8 120 Vol.9No.22012 2 9 1953 2 1979 2 2 1982
野村資本市場研究所｜アジアの金融競争力（PDF）
2013 Spring 1. GDP 3 26% 2. 3. 4. GDP 1 GDP 2000 25.4% 2012 10 IMF 1 GDP 28.7%GDP 10.7% 20.3% 2000 2012 10 2 3 2000 2012 4.2 5.4 2 2000 14% 2012 26% GDP 2012 30 10 32003 11 2013 Spring 100% 2 90% 80% 70%
untitled
IEEJ 1 IEEJ CO / 2 / CO / 3 4 2004 A B C D E F G 1 1 1 3 28 61 0 93 2 120 274 76 0 0 0 469 3 121 275 78 28 61 0 563 4-3 -18-0 0 0 0-21 5 118 256 78 28 61 0 542 6-54 -16-50 -21-61 80-121 7-19 -17 0-7 0
73 p.1 22 16 2004p.152
1987 p.80 72 73 p.1 22 16 2004p.152 281895 1930 1931 12 28 1930 10 27 12 134 74 75 10 27 47.6 1910 1925 10 10 76 10 11 12 139 p.287 p.10 11 pp.3-4 1917 p.284 77 78 10 13 10 p.6 1936 79 15 15 30 80 pp.499-501
122011pp.139174 18501933
122011pp.139174 18501933 122011 1850 3 187912 3 1850 8 1933 84 4 1871 12 1879 5 2 1 9 15 1 1 5 3 3 3 6 19 9 9 6 28 7 7 4 1140 9 4 3 5750 58 4 3 1 57 2 122011 3 4 134,500,000 4,020,000 11,600,000 5 2 678.00m
Microsoft Word - 映画『東京裁判』を観て.doc
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2008. 2 2010, 3 2010. p.1 4 2008 p.202 5 2008. p.228 6 2011. 7 / 2008. pp.3-4 1 8 1 9 10 11 8 2008, p.7 9 2011. p.41 10.51 11 2009. p. 2 12 13 14 12 2008. p.4 13 2008, p.7-8 14 2008. p.126
() L () 20 1
() 25 1 10 1 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 2 3 4 9308510 4432193 L () 20 1 PP 200,000 P13P14 3 0123456 12345 1234561 2 4 5 6 25 1 10 7 1 8 10 / L 10 9 10 11 () ( ) TEL 23 12 7 38 13 14 15 16 17 18 L 19 20 1000123456
戦後の補欠選挙
1 2 11 3 4, 1968, p.429., pp.140-141. 76 2005.12 20 14 5 2110 25 6 22 7 25 8 4919 9 22 10 11 12 13 58154 14 15 1447 79 2042 21 79 2243 25100 113 2211 71 113 113 29 p.85 2005.12 77 16 29 12 10 10 17 18
日経テレコン料金表（2016年4月）
1 2 3 4 8,000 15,000 22,000 29,000 5 6 7 8 36,000 42,000 48,000 54,000 9 10 20 30 60,000 66,000 126,000 166,000 50 100 246,000 396,000 1 25 8,000 7,000 620 2150 6,000 4,000 51100 101200 3,000 1,000 201
2 2 3 4 5 5 2 7 3 4 6 1 3 4 7 4 2 2 2 4 2 3 3 4 5 1932 A p. 40. 1893 A p. 224, p. 226. 1893 B pp. 1 2. p. 3.
1 73 72 1 1844 11 9 1844 12 18 5 1916 1 11 72 1 73 2 1862 3 1870 2 1862 6 1873 1 3 4 3 4 7 2 3 4 5 3 5 4 2007 p. 117. 2 2 3 4 5 5 2 7 3 4 6 1 3 4 7 4 2 2 2 4 2 3 3 4 5 1932 A p. 40. 1893 A p. 224, p. 226.
29 2011 3 4 1 19 5 2 21 6 21 2 21 7 2 23 21 8 21 1 20 21 1 22 20 p.61 21 1 21 21 1 23
29 2011 3 pp.55 86 19 1886 2 13 1 1 21 1888 1 13 2 3,500 3 5 5 50 4 1959 6 p.241 21 1 13 2 p.14 1988 p.2 21 1 15 29 2011 3 4 1 19 5 2 21 6 21 2 21 7 2 23 21 8 21 1 20 21 1 22 20 p.61 21 1 21 21 1 23 1
308 ( ) p.121
307 1944 1 1920 1995 2 3 4 5 308 ( ) p.121 309 10 12 310 6 7 ( ) ( ) ( ) 50 311 p.120 p.142 ( ) ( ) p.117 p.124 p.118 312 8 p.125 313 p.121 p.122 p.126 p.128 p.156 p.119 p.122 314 p.153 9 315 p.142 p.153
中国の貧困削減と制度的障害
1 1978 1978 2000 2.5 3000 30.7% 3% 2003p.4 1980 1990 1 1994 7 20 8000 1 1 2002 1655 5 2004p.142 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 2 Poverty Line 1978 1984 1 200 2003 637 1 1 1 1985 2 1 1 2100 2001 2003p.56 60% Engel s coefficient
1 2003 7 2005 6 2 1 2000 2002 2003 80.052 86.7 39 26.374 3 3 2 2 8 500 8 2008 6.4 10.3% 10 2008 3 11.7 10.6 9.9 9.3 3 1998 100 1999 3 71.2 2005 2007 17.9 14.1 1989 4 20 6 4 2004 1 4 5 5 ROA ROE 5 6 60
高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―
196 2017 * ** ** ** ** 160 2 2 JEL Classification Codes E21, E22, J11 Keywords * ESRI 28 ESRI 29 3 17 ESRI ** 115 196 Population Aging and Domestic Investment An Analysis Using International Panel Data
スライド 1
2030 (2004) 1 2 3 1 212004 5.5203031 (1) 2004GDP () 2030GDP )1 2122005 21 2 ASEAN+5 3 207.3EU8.03.3 (2004) 4 10 22.8 16.11 121,006 100 593,369 100 19,715 16 247,813 42 34,217 28 88,772 15 6,832 6 43,746
10Disclosure_H0104_0618
01 SHIZUOKA BANK GROUP REPORT 2010 SHIZUOKA BANK GROUP REPORT 2010 02 03 SHIZUOKA BANK GROUP REPORT 2010 SHIZUOKA BANK GROUP REPORT 2010 04 05 SHIZUOKA BANK GROUP REPORT 2010 06 SHIZUOKA BANK GROUP REPORT
Dill,, pp. - - EU i - - i - - - COE - COE COE COE Good Practice GP GP GP GP JABEE INQAAHE PDCA Plan-Do-Check-Action - FD FD - - Rice,, p. niche - i - -Jones,, pp. - MCAT - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
国際流動性に関する財政的側面について
IMF SDR IMF 2011 6 1 2 2011 E-mail: [email protected] / /2011.10 35 1. 2007 2009 2 Goodhart [1999] 2010 11 2. 4 1970 IMF 1960 36 /2011.10 international reserve 1 D 35 1 D 35 1960 Eichengreen [2011]
野村資本市場研究所｜ベイルインの導入に向けた検討－破綻時に債権の損失吸収を図る新たな措置－（PDF）
1. SIFI 2. EU 1 FDIC G20 FSB 3. 4. FSB 2012 8 G20 88 2012 6 EU EU bail-in 1 ICB 2 write-down SIFI SIFI SIFI bail-out SIFI G20 too big to fail 2010 6 G20 SIFI 1 3 2011 11 FSBG20 1 2 3 2012 ICB PLAC 2011
5 I The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthenin
5 I. 3 1 1990 2 The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthening North Pacific Cooperation organized by the East-West
目 次 はじめに 1. 特異な高貯蓄 低消費体質 なぜ 貯蓄率が高いのか 高貯蓄体質は改善されるか 資金循環からみた中国リスク 急速な信用収縮は起こるか 1 2 おわりに もうひとつの中国リスク はじめに RIM 214 V
中国リスクのもうひとつの見方 調査部 要 旨 主任研究員 三浦有史 2 GDP 5 33.125 197 141GDP 79.3 211 154GDP 324.327 LGFVs LGFVs RIM 214 Vol.14 No.53 1 目 次 はじめに 1. 特異な高貯蓄 低消費体質 1 2 3 2. なぜ 貯蓄率が高いのか 1 2 3 3. 高貯蓄体質は改善されるか 1 2 3 4. 資金循環からみた中国リスク
Association of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN
Association of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: FTA FTA ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN The European Union: EU
ネパール東部山岳地域における自然資源管理
60 26-30 14 8 km 2 2400 200m 8800 91 1) Terai 300 23 45 2) Hill 300 2500m 42 46 3) Himalaya Mountain 2500 35 7 3 18 13 38 15 20 92 GDP 225USD 1998/99 80 GDP 40 50 GDP 30 18 8 1970 2-3 3 5 Region 2 3 9
会社法制上の資本制度の変容と企業会計上の資本概念について
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 2006-J-1 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 103-8660 30 http://www.imes.boj.or.jp IMES Discussion Paper Series 2006-J-1 2006 1
開発金融増刊号
4 6 Y = f (, E, Y E ( Y E = α ( E α we py α 0 β E ( ( E β ( E β 6 ( = ( α β ( E β 8 i Y i f i, E i, i 9 Y = α α ( α E α S E 0 ( β β E β E( β E β β6 ( we Y = = = α β E py E β ( β Y Y B Y A r / pr p Y
1 2 2005 1983 1 ()1984 2 1947 1950 19791996 1
KEO Discussion Paper No.104 19451947 * ** 2006 11 19451947 * ** 1 2 2005 1983 1 ()1984 2 1947 1950 19791996 1 4 A A A A A 3 3 1990 19952003A2003B 4 2 198719941997 1995 1995 3 5 6 1998: 30 40 19701992 7
目次はじめに 1. 中国の少子高齢化 人口ボーナス論と中国経済 中国の人口ボーナスの課題 人口ボーナスと地域間経済格差 はじめに , demographic dividend 15 6
持続的経済成長の課題 要 旨 調査部環太平洋戦略研究センター 主任研究員 大泉啓一郎 1.6 2009 15 64 2015 50 RIM 2011 Vol.11 No.40 1 目次はじめに 1. 中国の少子高齢化 1 2 3 2. 人口ボーナス論と中国経済 1 2 3 3. 中国の人口ボーナスの課題 1 2 4. 人口ボーナスと地域間経済格差 はじめに 1970 30 2000 2009 65
Microsoft Word - 査読SP問題110510RR.doc
JAVCERM Journal [] 2 # 2011_01_Ronko 2010 1 4 2011 5 12 1 2 2 1999 National Bank of Keystone(Keystone), Pacific Thrift and Loan(PLT) FDIC CAMEAL 20 20 1 11 6 2.2 2000 Greenspan FRB 2000 IT IT Greenspan[2004]
ＧＤＰギャップと潜在成長率
2003 output gap 80 1 20 90 20 70 2 1 2 output gap potential output 1 2 (2001) 3 potential rate of growth 2000 Meyer (2000) European Central Bank: (1999b) 2002 10 4 3 (2000) 4 4 () 5 5 5 6 () () 7 Total
<30335F8FAC88E490EC8E812E696E6464>
ODA ODA ODA ODA Lodge and WilsonStiglitz MDGs DAC HIV HIV United Nations OECD DAC OECD OECD DAC DAC DAC ODA ODA ODA ODA GNP GDP ODA Chun ODA ODA OECD ODA ODA ODA ODA ODA ODA ODA a ODA OECD EDCF Economic
Autumn EU 22 CD P RR 9 7 EU EU 2003 OECD 8 EU OECD OECD EC Included in Society 2003 EC OECD EU
138 Vol. 44 No. 2 はじめに 20 2008 5 2007 9 EU I 障害者政策の国際比較研究 1981 80 90 1990 ADA 1 1999 OAS 2 1996 CD P RR 3 EC 2003 2004 2010 1993 10 ESCAP 4 10 2003 BMF 5 BMF 2007 9 2001 2006 12 2008 5 2000 EU EC EU Autumn
産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf
2003 11 10 IT IT JIP JCER ) 2003 CD-ROM http://www.esri.go.jp/jp/archive/bun/bun170/170index. html 1 JIP Jorgenson, Mun, andstiroh (2002) GDP 2 3 1951 1954 1957 1960 1963 1966 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981
26 multiculturarism 25 EU 21
2 IOM NGO integration assimilation 25 26 multiculturarism 25 EU 21 IOM 27 5 10 28 13 8.9 734 200 187 100 33 1990 460 1,420 960 2003 76 9,000 62 6,000 500 2003 76 9,000 13 3,000 EU EU EU EU 7 EU EU 200
PDF用 レポート：中国保険市場の現状と展望.PDF
1 INDEX 2 4 9 13 24 29 2 3 4 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 100% 50% 0% 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 5 6 7 8 9
ワークショップ「国際財務報告基準（IFRS）と企業行動：IFRSアドプションのインパクト」の模様
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IFRS IFRS Discussion Paper No. 2010-J-25 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 103-8660 2-1-1 http://www.imes.boj.or.jp IMES Discussion Paper Series 2010-J-25
1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 Keio Economic Observatory Occasional Paper J.No.28 1993 pp4-54 2
1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 Keio Economic Observatory Occasional Paper J.No.28 1993 pp4-54 2 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 3 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 4 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 10 5 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 1 1 2005 1-1 18 P. 6 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007
<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>
2011 Vol.60 No.2 p.138 147 Performance of the Japanese long-term care benefit: An International comparison based on OECD health data Mie MORIKAWA[1] Takako TSUTSUI[2] [1]National Institute of Public Health,