食道がん化学放射線療法後のsalvage手術

Similar documents
橡

日本消化器外科学会雑誌第30巻第3号

untitled

VOL.48 NO.5 Key words: locally advanced esophageal cancer, multimodality therapy, neo- adjuvant chemoradiotherapy

untitled

1_2.eps

PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF LATERAL WALL OROPHARYNGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA TOMOHIKO NIGAURI, M.D., SHIN ETSU KAMATA, M.D., KAZUYOSHI KAWABATA, M.D. MUNE


日本消化器外科学会教育集会

Gy - FP -FU mg/m Day -, CDDP: mg/m Day FP -FU mg/m Day -, CDDP: mg/m Day T N M Ⅲ. 結果 - cc - cc Tis: / T a: / T b: / T : / T : / T : / f-stage Stage =

untitled

日本消化器外科学会雑誌第23巻第2号

CHEMOTHERAPY APR. 1984

肺癌第42巻第6号

untitled

69 (877) pigeon chest, modified Ravitch operation, chest plastic surgery Robicsek classification

32 1 BRONJ BRONJ II BRONJ BRONJ 4 BP BRONJ 6 1 III BP BRONJ

日本消化器外科学会雑誌第29巻第9号

51-3 ›Áfi¡†i85-95†j

スライド 1

CHEMOTHERAPY JUNE 1993 Table 1. Background of patients in pharmacokinetic study

プログラム テーマ 中咽頭 (13 : : 45) 1 13 : : 35 : CQ1 : HPV CQ2 : : : 40 : CQ3 : CQ4 : : : 45 : CQ5 :

ANALYSIS OF RADIOTHERAPY FOR LUMBOSACRAL CARCINOMATOUS NEUROPATHY Masatoshi TANIGUCHI, Yuko KANEYASU, Kumiko KARASAWA, Noboru FUKUHARA Makiko TANAKA,

I II III 28 29

生活設計レジメ

44 4 I (1) ( ) (10 15 ) ( 17 ) ( 3 1 ) (2)


untitled

表 2 第 33 回日本外科学会 (1932 年 ) における瀬尾による食道癌宿題報告 ( 文献 8 より引用 ) 表 1 第 33 回日本外科学会 (1932 年 ) における瀬尾による食道癌宿題報告 ( 文献 8 より引用 ) 図 1 中山恒明先生による胸壁前食道胃吻合の図 ( 文献 10 より

Arthroscopic Treatment for Painful Bennett Lesions of the Shoulder in Baseball Players by M. Yoneda and K. Hayashida Department of Orthopaedic Surgery

Gynecologic Oncology Trial and Investigation Consortium GOTIC-002

Ⅱ Hb 4.1g/dl S LST G S ESD 10 S S 4 4 S D mL tub1 muc SS ly0 v0 PM0 DM0 N0 0/27 S tub1 tub2 SS

Sekijuzi-27.indd

8 The Bulletin of Meiji University of Integrative Medicine API II 61 ASO X 11 7 X-4 6 X m 5 X-2 4 X 3 9 X 11 7 API 0.84 ASO X 1 1 MR-angio

生命倫理100_資料4-7

Table 2 Cases of Nail Deformity Associated with upward Distortion of Distal Soft Tissue No. Age Sex Affected RegionsDuration Results M Both grea

耳鼻咽喉科の診療に関連した味覚障害

Quality of Life of Outpatients Treated with Low Anterior Resection or Anterior Resection for Colorectal Cancer orrelation Between Dyschezia and Self-c

untitled

好酸球性副鼻腔炎:診断ガイドライン(JESREC Study)

BLADDER PRESERVATION BY CHEMORADIOTHERAPY IN COMBINATION WITH RADICAL TUR-BT IN MUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER Jun-Ichiro Ishiokal, Yukio Kageyama1, N

_’£”R‡Ù‡©

Table 1 Laboratory findings on admission Figure 2. Clinical course after admission 1-a 1-b 1-c 3-a 3-b 3-c Figure 1. CT findings on first admission: S

Psychosomatical study on five cases with oral cancer committing suicide Masatsugu Shimizu and Keiichiro Ono Abstract: The records of five oral cancer

48-3 ‰{”R†i74-84†j


untitled

卵巣癌の治療

原著・報告・記録(44行)/P134~147_報告 肝移植症例登録




明海大学歯学雑誌 40‐2☆/1.前川


特集・総説・報告(44行)/P045-055_報告 日本肝移植研究会

九州大学学術情報リポジトリ Kyushu University Institutional Repository 高齢心疾患患者における運動機能と身体的フレイル評価の意義 内藤, 紘一九州大学大学院人間環境学府 京都橘大学健康科学部 熊谷, 秋三九州大学大学院人間環境学府 九州大学基幹教育院 九州大

i


Wide Scanner TWAIN Source ユーザーズガイド

原 著 放射線皮膚炎に対する保湿クリームの効果 耳鼻科領域の頭頸部照射の患者に保湿クリームを使用して * 要旨 Gy Key words はじめに 1 70Gy 2 2 QOL

05_学術.indd

268 LSG 図 Lee ABCD 表 1 4 Age BMI C Duration Still DiaRem 表 1 4 HbA1c Ⅱ 対象と方法 1 17 LSG 6 3 Excess Weight Loss EWL BMI 25 kg/m 2 Hb

2 The Bulletin of Meiji University of Integrative Medicine 3, Yamashita 10 11

E3200 BV FOLFOX4 FOLFOX4 PFS % 0.42, 0.65 p< log-rank % FOLFOX4 8.6% FOLFOX % FOLFOX4 259/ % FOL

untitled

03_学術.indd

276-E12001.indd

第1部 一般的コメント

Fig. 1 Chemical structure of TE-031 Code number: TE-031 Chemical name: (-) (3R, 4S, 5S, 6R, 7R, 9R, 11R, 12R, 13S, 14R)-4-[(2, 6-dideoxy-3-C-methyl-3-

脈管学55巻7号 pp


_02戸沢.indd

untitled

表1票4.qx4

福祉行財政と福祉計画[第3版]

第1章 国民年金における無年金

C/NC : committed/noncommitted

Arthroscopic Subacromial Decompression for Impingement Syndrome by E. Shimozaki, K. Kitaoka, T. Matsumoto, H. Itokawa, T. Kobayashi and K. Tomita Depa

原著・報告・記録(44行)/P261~274_報告 肝移植症例登録

原著・報告・記録(44行)/P156~169_報告 肝移植症例登録

特殊病態下感染症における抗菌薬治験の手引き作成委員会報告書(案)

Group5 tub1 CT ct4b cn1 ch0 cp0 cm0 cstage a D3 A V Type5 muc tub1 pt4b pn1 1/28 No. 201 pstage a UFT/UZEL 5

28 1 1a 1b 2 MRI T2 3 CT C3 N95 N95 6ml 90

日本消化器外科学会雑誌第31巻第7号


II III I ~ 2 ~

中堅中小企業向け秘密保持マニュアル


PR映画-1

- 2 -


1 (1) (2)

橡ミュラー列伝Ⅰ.PDF

untitled

EVALUATION OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (MRI) IN DIAGNOSIS OF ACOUSTIC NEUROMA-COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH PLAIN X-RAY AND CTS- KIMIHISA NOMURA, M.D., MAK

日本職業・災害医学会会誌第51巻第5号


PowerPoint Presentation

クローン

Table 1. Numbers of Cancerous Pleurisy Cases According to Primary Site Table 2. Histological Type of Lung Carcinoma with Cancerous Pleurisy at Autopsy

Transcription:

2006 2 17 52

Daly JM, et al. J Am Coll Surg 2000;190:562-573

Esophageal Cancer: Results of an American College of Surgeons Patient Care Evaluation Study Daly JM, et al. J Am Coll Surg 2000;190:562-573

Esophageal Cancer: Results of an American College of Surgeons Patient Care Evaluation Study Daly JM, et al. J Am Coll Surg 2000;190:562-573

Esophageal Cancer: Results of an American College of Surgeons Patient Care Evaluation Study Daly JM, et al. J Am Coll Surg 2000;190:562-573

Esophageal Cancer: Results of an American College of Surgeons Patient Care Evaluation Study Daly JM, et al. J Am Coll Surg 2000;190:562-573

Esophageal Cancer (PDQ ): Treatment Stage III Esophageal Cancer Treatment of stage III esophageal cancer may include the following: Surgery. Clinical trials of chemotherapy plus radiation therapy, with or without surgery. Clinical trials of new therapies used before or after surgery.

Esophageal Cancer (PDQ ): Treatment Stage III Esophageal Cancer Standard treatment options: Surgical resection of T3 lesions. Treatment options under clinical evaluation: Chemotherapy plus radiation therapy with or without subsequent surgery.[1,2] Information about ongoing clinical trials is available from the NCI Web site.

Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer

Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in 2000

2005 1 12005 12 31 15 23 33 25 61 18 5 5 35 114 106

Stage II Stage III

2005 1 12005 12 31 8 7 35 13 Stage II, III: T4 2 4 1 34 23 22 4 5

1?

1998 2003 EMR (T4) M1-org)

Number (n=259) Male : female 225 : 34 Age (mean+sd) 34-82 (63.0 8.6) Upper 39 Middle 141 Lower 79 Squamous 254 Adenocarcinoma 2 Others 3

ctnm staging Number (n=259) T1 147 T2 17 T3 95 N0 158 N1 101 Stage I 130 Stage II, III 101 Stage IV(Lym) 28 Stage IV(LYM): metastasis in cervical or celiac lymph node

Stage I CDDP 80mg/mm 2 5FU 800mg/mm 2 Radiation 2Gy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112 1314 15161718 1920 2122 - - 28 29 - - -35 x2

Stage II, III, IV(LYM) CDDP 40mg/mm 2 5FU 400mg/mm 2 Radiation 2Gy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 111213141516171819202122 - - 28 29 - - -35 + x 2 CDDP 80mg/mm 2 5FU 800mg/mm 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 111213141516171819202122 - - -28 x 2 -

Survival rate Stage I (n=130) Stage II, III (n=101) Stage IV (Lym) (n=28) year Kaplan-Meier)

Stage I Surgery (n=72) Survival rate Chemoradiotherapy (n=130) year Kaplan-Meier)

Stage I Chemorad 130 CR 123 95% Rec(-) 88 68% Rec(+) 35 Salvage(+) 25 Esophagectomy: 6 Dissection 1 EMR: 18 Salvage(-) 10 Alive 74 Died 14 Alive 17 Died 8 Alive 0 Died 10 Non-CR 7 Chemorad: chemoradiotherapy, CR: complete response, Rec: recurrence, EMR: endoscopic mucosal resection Salvage(+) 5 Esophagectomy: 4 EMR: 1 Salvage(-) 2 Alive 3 Died 2 Alive 1 Died 1

Stage II, III Survival rate Surgery (n=350) Chemoradiotherapy (n=101) year Kaplan-Meier)

Stage IV(Lym) Survival rate year Surgery (n=97) Chemoradiotherapy (n=28) Kaplan-Meier)

1

JCOG9708 (phase II) Stage I (T1N0M0) (CDDP/5-FU)II T1N0M05FU CDDP JCOG 0502 (phase III) cstage I ct1n0m0

2?

Salvage Survival rate Stage I (n=130) Stage II, III (n=101) Stage IV (Lym) (n=28) year Kaplan-Meier)

Stage I Chemorad 130 CR 123 95% Rec(-) 88 68% Rec(+) 35 Salvage(+) 25 Esophagectomy: 6 Dissection 1 EMR: 18 Salvage(-) 10 Alive 74 Died 14 Alive 17 Died 8 Alive 0 Died 10 Non-CR 7 Chemorad: chemoradiotherapy, CR: complete response, Rec: recurrence, EMR: endoscopic mucosal resection Salvage(+) 5 Esophagectomy: 4 EMR: 1 Salvage(-) 2 Salvage(+) 30 Esophagectomy:10 Dissection 1 EMR: 19 Alive 3 Died 2 Alive 1 Died 1

Stage II, III Chemorad 101 CR 66 65% Non-CR 35 Chemorad: chemoradiotherapy, CR: complete response, Rec: recurrence, EMR: endoscopic mucosal resection Rec(-) 38 38% Rec(+) 27 Salvage(+) 13 Esophagectomy: 5 Dissection 1 EMR: 7 Salvage(-) 14 Salvage(+) 10 Esophagectomy: 8 Dissection 1 EMR: 1 Salvage(-) 25 Salvage(+) 23 Esophagectomy:13 Dissection 2 EMR: 8 Alive 33 Died 5 Alive 9 Died 4 Alive 2 Died 12 Alive 4 Died 6 Alive 1 Died 24

Stage IV(Lym) CR 9 Rec(-) 4 15% Alive 4 Died 0 32% Salvage(+) 0 Chemorad 28 Rec(+) 5 Salvage(-) 5 Alive 1 Died 4 Non-CR 19 Chemorad: chemoradiotherapy, CR: complete response, Rec: recurrence, EMR: endoscopic mucosal resection Salvage(+) 3 Esophagectomy: 3 Salvage(-) 16 Salvage(+) 3 Esophagectomy: 3 Alive 1 Died 2 Alive 0 Died 16

59 2 CRT CR- EMR Salvage Surgery

2 Salvage

Ishikura S, et al. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:2697-2702

Ishikura S, et al. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:2697-2702

2005 6 10

3 Salvage Salvage

59 1 CR non-cr

Stage I Chemorad 130 CR 123 95% Rec(-) 88 68% Rec(+) 35 Salvage(+) 25 Esophagectomy: 6 Dissection 1 EMR: 18 Salvage(-) 10 Alive 74 Died 14 Alive 17 Died 8 Alive 0 Died 10 Non-CR 7 Chemorad: chemoradiotherapy, CR: complete response, Rec: recurrence, EMR: endoscopic mucosal resection Salvage(+) 5 Esophagectomy: 4 EMR: 1 Salvage(-) 2 Alive 3 Died 2 Alive 1 Died 1

Stage I Chemorad 130 CR 123 95% Rec(-) 88 68% Rec(+) 35 Salvage(-) :10 PUL 2 HEP: 2 PLE: 1 LYM: 3 PS: 1 Reject: 1 Non-CR 7 Chemorad: chemoradiotherapy, CR: complete response, Rec: recurrence Salvage(-) : 2 Complication: 1 Reject: 1

Stage II, III Chemorad 101 CR 66 65% Non-CR 35 Chemorad: chemoradiotherapy, CR: complete response, Rec: recurrence, EMR: endoscopic mucosal resection Rec(-) 38 38% Rec(+) 27 Salvage(+) 13 Esophagectomy: 5 Dissection 1 EMR: 7 Salvage(-) 14 Salvage(+) 10 Esophagectomy: 8 Dissection 1 EMR: 1 Salvage(-) 25 Alive 33 Died 5 Alive 9 Died 4 Alive 2 Died 12 Alive 4 Died 6 Alive 1 Died 24

Stage II, III CR 66 65% Rec(-) 38 38% Rec(+) 28 PUL: 3 BON: 2 LYM: 5 T4: 1 Reject: 4 Chemorad 101 Non-CR 35 Chemorad: chemoradiotherapy, CR: complete response, Rec: recurrence Salvage(-) : 15 Salvage(-) : 26 PUL: 2 HEP: 1 BON: 2 PLE: 2 KID: 1 T4: 3 PS: 6 Complication: 1 Reject: 8

3 Salvage Salvage

59 3 Stage II,IIISurgery vs CRT Stage II, III (CRT) -Surgery vs CRT - EMR Salvage Surgery

JCOG 9906 (phase II) Stage II,III II prospective Phase II Stage II,III +/-Salvage surgery

2005 1 12005 12 31 Surgeon A Surgeon B Surgeon C Non-Salvage 42 42 28 Salvage 1 14(25%) 2

Salvage

Salvage surgery CRT Salvage surgery n=62

Salvage surgery CRT Salvage surgery n=62 n=4 T4: 2 LYM: 2 n=58

Salvage surgery CRT Salvage surgery n=62 n=58 n=4 T4: 2 LYM: 2 n=7 T4: 6 n=51 PUL: 1 PER: 1

Salvage (n=62) (n=185) R0 51 (82%) 171 (92%) R1, R2 7 (11%) 14 (8%) Probe 4 (6%)

Salvage Esophagectomy Radical R1, R2 Probe ct1 13 ct2 6 ct3 38 5 3 T4: 4 T4: 2 PER:1 Lym:1 ct4 5 2 1 T4: 2 T4: 1 PUL:1

Salvage

Salvage surgery CRT Salvage surgery

Salvage Salvage 60Gy 1998 2005 5

Salvage 1998-2005 Salvage (n=58) Age mean SD 60.8 8.4 Male : female 55 : 2 Tumor location Upper 13 (22%) Middle 26 (45%) Lower 19 (33%) ctnm stage Stage I 12 (21%) Stage II 16 (28%) Stage III 22 (38%) Stage IV 8 (14%)

Chemoradiotherapy 1998-2005 Patients n=58) National Cancer Center Hospital 36 (62%) Other hospital 22 (38%) Radiation dose 60 Gy 55 (95%) 70 Gy 3 (5%) Chemotherapy Platinum+5FU 56 (97%) Platinum alone 2 (3%) Chemotherapy course 2 20 (34%) 3-4 33 (57%) 5-8 5 (9%)

1998-2005 Chemoradiotherapy Patients n=58) non-cr 34 (59%) Recurrence after CR 24 (41%) Duration after chemoradiotherapy 6 months 21 (36%) > 6 months 27 (47%) > 12 months 10 (17%)

Salvage Esophagectomy 1998-2005 Salvage (n=58) (n=185) Right thoracotomy 54 (93%) 184 (99%) Left thoracotomy 1 (.5%) Transhiatal 4 (7%) 3-field 25 (43%) 169 (91%) others 33 (57%) 16 (9%)

Reconstruction 1998-2005 Salvage (n=58) (n=185) 22 (38%) 161 (87%) 33 (57%) 22 (12%) 3 (5%) 2 (1%) 55 (95%) 163 (88%) 3 (5%) 22 (12%) 41 (71%) 175 (95%) 14 (24%) 9 (5%) 3 (5%) 1 (.5%)

1998-2005 Salvage (n=58) (n=185) 20 (34%) 51 (28%) 19 (33%) 34 (18%) 5 (9%) 7 (4%) 11 (19%) 21 (11%) 30 34 (59%) 147 (80%) 31 17 (30%) 32 (17%) 7 (12%) 6 (3%)

Salvage surgery CRT Salvage surgery n=58 n=7 Operative: 1 Hospital: 5 Salvage

Salvage

Salvage?

Salvage No.1 No.2 No.3 No.4 No.5 No.6 No.7 No.8 CV

Lateral longitudinal anastomosis Lateral longitudinal anastomosis

Salvage No.1 No.2 No.3 No.4 No.5

5 Salvage

Salvage surgery CRT Salvage surgery n=62 n=51 n=11 n=7 n=44

Salvage No.1 CO2 20M 14M No.2 CO2 21M 12M No.3 CO2 19M 12M

Salvage surgery CRT Salvage surgery n=62 n=51 n=11 n=7 n=3 n=44

Salvage surgery n=51 n=7 n=3 n=14 Local: 6 Lym: 5 Org: 3 n=44 Salvage

6 Salvage?

Without preoperative therapy (n=185) Survival rate Salvage esophagectomy (n=58) year Kaplan-Meier)

Salvage Survival rate Recurrence after CR (n=24) non-cr (n=34) year Kaplan-Meier)

Salvage Survival rate R0 (n=51) R1, R2 (n=7) year Kaplan-Meier)

Salvage Survival rate ct1 (n=13) ct2 (n=6) ct3 (n=35) ct4 (n=4) year Kaplan-Meier)

6 Salvage

Salvage surgery CRT Salvage surgery n=62 n=51 n=11 n=7 n=3 n=14 n=44

Salvage Salvage

Salvage Salvage

(

2003 4

QOL