QQE QQE QQE1 QQE2 QQE3

Similar documents
-February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs

*.E (..).R

) ,

FA

先端社会研究 ★5★号/4.山崎

わが国のコモディティ投資信託とETF

16_.....E...._.I.v2006

2 146

CA HP,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,


,

WASEDA RILAS JOURNAL

II

Sport and the Media: The Close Relationship between Sport and Broadcasting SUDO, Haruo1) Abstract This report tries to demonstrate the relationship be

„h‹¤.05.07

_’¼Œì



YUHO

untitled

大学論集第42号本文.indb


13....*PDF.p

:- Ofer Feldman,Feldman : -


Bull. of Nippon Sport Sci. Univ. 47 (1) Devising musical expression in teaching methods for elementary music An attempt at shared teaching


untitled

: , , % ,299 9, , % ,

262 F s PRO A Community Investment and the Role of Non-profit Organizations: Present Conditions in the US, the UK, and Japan Takashi Koseki Abstract 1

- March SCB -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -,,,,,, -, -, -, -,, -,,,, -,,,,,, - -,, -,, Survey of Current Business, July, Table (p. ), Oct, Table (p. ) S.

untitled

わが国証券市場、証券業界の戦後70年


<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>

11モーゲージカンパニー研究論文.PDF

BJ-No.7 01 三好秀和.indd

49148


74-2 岩間

ABSTRACT The movement to increase the adult literacy rate in Nepal has been growing since democratization in In recent years, about 300,000 peop

Vol.2.indb

環境影響評価制度をめぐる法的諸問題(4) : 米国の環境影響評価制度について

研究成果報告書

Non-Deliverable Forwards NDF BIS BIS

関西における地域銀行について

本文

The Meaning of the Activation of TV Programs on Japanese Domestic Politics in s Katsuyuki YAKUSHIJI Makoto YAMASHITA 1 はじめに : NHK 41

-October TPP ASEAN RCEP TPP MV Islamic State, IS EU EU EU EU EU

本文H21.4.indd

金/金


- October , -,,,, ,, -


施 ほか/3-18


01_梅村佳代_紀要_2007最終


SPA H&M ZARA ZARA ZARA DHL Door-to-door 2


ISSN ISBN C3033 The Institute for Economic Studies Seijo University , Seijo, Setagaya Tokyo , Japan

untitled

12_11B-5-00-omote※トンボ付き.indd

はじめに

/ p p


[ ]永井(責).indd

yasi10.dvi

161 J 1 J 1997 FC 1998 J J J J J2 J1 J2 J1 J2 J1 J J1 J1 J J 2011 FIFA 2012 J 40 56

在日外国人高齢者福祉給付金制度の創設とその課題

人文地理62巻4号


Financial Reporting Standard 17 FRS17 FAS87 87 Financial Accounting Standard 87 FAS87 International Accounting Standard Board IASB 19 Internat

_Y05…X…`…‘…“†[…h…•

[ ]アップル荒井


CONTENTS Public relations brochure of Higashikawa September No.755 2

,,.,,.,..,.,,,.,, Aldous,.,,.,,.,,, NPO,,.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,..,,,,.,

DOUSHISYA-sports_R12339(高解像度).pdf

<31322D899C8CA982D982A95F985F95B65F2E696E6464>

NO

TEM

【生】④木原資裕先生【本文】/【生】④木原資裕先生【本文】

SPSS

<30372D985F95B62D8E52967B8C4F8E7190E690B62E706466>

untitled

untitled

6 7 22


表紙1-4.eps

JR4 JR 3 JR4 KUSUKI, Yukio JR 4 JR JR JR JR JR JR JR , ,530/90 17/ JR

(2) IPP Independent Power Producers IPP 1995 NCC(New Common Carrier NCC NTT NTT NCC NTT NTT IPP 2. IPP (3) [1] [2] IPP [2] IPP IPP [1] [2]



The Journal of the Japan Academy of Nursing Administration and Policies Vol 7, No 2, pp 19 _ 30, 2004 Survey on Counseling Services Performed by Nursi


29 Short-time prediction of time series data for binary option trade

untitled

評論・社会科学 87号(よこ)(P)/1.小林

Webサービス本格活用のための設計ポイント

Transcription:

QQE1 QQE1 QQE1 QQE1 QQE QQE QQE QQE1, QQE2, QQE3, QQE4

QQE QQE QQE1 QQE2 QQE3

QQE1 FRB QQE2 http://www.stat-search.boj.or.jp/index.html http://www.stat-search.boj.or.jp/index.html

QQE3 QQE1 ETF: Exchange Traded Fund J-REIT: Real Estate Investment Trust

GDP QQE2 QQE2 QQE1 ETF REIT QQE3 EU

QQE3 QQE1 QQE2 GDP QQE1 http://www.boj.or.jp/announcements/release_2013/k130404a.pdf

QQE QQE QQE

QQE QQE QQE QQE QQE QQE

GDP FRB FRB QQE QQE QQE QQE CPI CPI QQE QQE

QQE3 GDP QQE QQE3

QQE4 QQE4 ETF REIT CP GDP QQE QQE QQE4 http://www.boj.or.jp/mopo/mpmsche_minu/minu_2016/g160729.pdf http://www.boj.or.jp/announcements/release_2016/k160921a.pdf http://www.boj.or.jp/announcements/release_2016/k160921b.pdf

QQE4 QQE QQE4 BP https://www.boj.or.jp/announcements/press/koen_2013/ko130828a.htm/ 06 J 14 QQE4

https://www.boj.or.jp/research/wps_rev/wps_2006/wp06j14.htm/ J 7 https://www.boj.or.jp/research/wps_rev/rev_2015/rev15j08.htm/ https://www.boj.or.jp/research/wps_rev/lab/lab15j07.htm/

A Study on the Abe Administration s Quantitative and Qualitative Monetary Easing Policy KIMURA Jiro In the 46th general election of members of the House of Representatives held on December 16, 2012, the Liberal Democratic Party of Japan LDP gained a substantial victory, and the Abe administration was established. In his inaugural address, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe expressed his firm intention to promote a set of economic policies named the three arrows : aggressive monetary easing, flexible fiscal stimulus, and a new growth strategy, with the aim of rescuing the Japaneseeconomy from prolonged deflation. Pushed by the government, and based on a joint announcement policy accord issued with the government, Masaaki Shirakawa, the then Governor of the Bank of Japan BOJ agreed to set a 2 inflation target in January 2013. To achieve this target, Haruhiko Kuroda, who succeeded Mr. Shirakawa in March 2013, introduced the quantitative and qualitative monetary easing QQE policy on April 4, 2013. During the period of rock-bottom rates that started in 1995, the BOJ introduced a new monetary measure called unconventional monetary policies, including zero interest rates, quantitative monetary easing QE and comprehensive monetary easing policies. Similar unconventional monetary policies have also been employed in the United States and European countries since the Lehman Brothers went bankrupt in 2008. Generally, the QQE policy adopted by the Kuroda-led BOJ can be categorized as an extension of these unconventional monetary policies. However, because the implementation level and impact of QQE are more extensive than existing policies in terms of scale and extent, the QQE policy by Mr. Kuroda is also called ijigenkanwa different dimension easing policy. It can be said that QQE was actually introduced under compulsion of the government as a measure to attain the 2 inflation target. Although three years and several months have passed since the introduction of the QQE policy, the BOJ has not yet achieved its initial goal of realizing a 2 inflation target within two years. The purpose of this study is to assess the monetary easing policies implemented by the BOJ. In Chapter 1, I examine the dogma of pro-reflation economists a doctrine that considers deflation as the cause of the economic stagnation, which is an underlying idea of the QQE policy, from a critical viewpoint. Chapter 2 clarifies that although the QQE policy has had a favorable impact on the monetary economy such as foreign exchange rates, the stock market and the bond market, their effectiveness in the real economy has not yet been adequately confirmed. Chapter 3 examines the relationship between monetary policy and fiscal policy, particularly focusing on monet ary financing issues, in an attempt to point out that the increase in the future risk of economic difficulties such as sudden rise of interest rate sudden drop of government bond price, hyper-

inflation and so on is an adverse effect of the QQE policy. Chapter 4 introduces existing principal statements/opinions on QQE policy assessment issues. Chapter 5 provides a critical examination of the details of a shift in monetary easing policy and comprehensive assessment, which were discussed at the BOJ Monetary Policy Meeting held in September 2016.

Does Gaussian Elimination Teach About Uninterpretable Feature Elimination in CHL? ARIKAWA Koji