% % % % % % 3 29% % %

Similar documents
1996年の米国大統領選挙と政治資金

untitled

科技表紙PDF200602



0911_hyo1.eps

hosono.indd

320_…X…e†Q“õ‹øfiÁ’F

2

科技表紙PDF200505


広報1505月号.indd

untitled

日本の犯罪現象

,255 7, ,355 4,452 3,420 3,736 8,206 4, , ,992 6, ,646 4,

090706yoron


Donald Trump 1 1 Thomas Wright NATO TPP NAFTA Vladimir Putin

P _…J…›†[…y†[…W18“ƒ

(2005a) (2005) ( ) (2004) (2003) 3 (2003) (2003) 2


04_小松.indd

nishiyama.indd

< E348EA C88A778F898D5A90B32E706466>

上海協力機構(SCO) 創設の経緯と課題


(Information Technology )

RIETI Highlight VOL.25

冷戦後の戦略環境変化とクリントン政権

『アーカイブズ』第21巻(下)(平成17年9月30日)


52 立教アメリカン スタディーズ Obama 2008:

「日本版NSC(国家安全保障会議)」の課題―日本の安全保障会議と米国のNSC―

Peace Corps Voluntary Service Overseas VSO JICA No

.^.e.E q...w.I.v...n..42..A.ren

74-2 岩間

160_cov.indd

2016 family values values voters values voters

.L.....C1302.qxd

橡12小池和雄.PDF


Mark A. Peterson, Legislating Together: The White House and Capitol Hill from Eisenhower to Reagan, Cambridge : Harvard University Press, Michel Foley

アメリカ大統領選挙の手続

国連安全保障理事会の拒否権―安保理改革問題に関連して―

A5 PDF.pwd

和RIMNo.22高安氏.indd

物価指数の計測誤差と品質調整手法:わが国CPIからの教訓

中国引き締め策の対外的影響

Do!_vol359.indd


_Œkž−01


GDP 1962 Kingdom of Bhutan

核開発問題をめぐる中国の北朝鮮政策―2002年10月~2005年11月―

62

参考:労働統計機関一覧|データブック国際労働比較2018|JILPT

„h‹¤.05.07

memo ii

05研究紀要第3号_卒論_松澤一真様59-74.indd


376-08ooi.indd

大和田/大和田

地方債と地方財政規律

アメリカ民主党再生戦略をめぐって

野村資本市場研究所|「財政の崖」回避をめぐる議論と米国地方債市場(PDF)


和RIM28_向山氏.indd

揃 Lag [hour] Lag [day] 35


<313197E996D82E696E6464>

kikin2_web.pdf


時実象一 _edit.PDF

2 Saddam Hussain % 56% 20%

P _小林.indd


mr0511_01fix.indd



広報さかき2006年11月号-18p.indd

bangumi1411

橡25渡辺航.PDF

B

03報文_薄井寛.indd

_16_.indd

.L.....C1205.qxd

.L.....C1105.qxd

Contents

- March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade

1601_05_imamura_責_e.indd


広報なんぶ2月_No86.indd

縺・・縺。謔縲・シ冗ャャ・難シ仙捷

『広島平和科学』24 (2002) pp

靖国神社とはなにか

KII, Masanobu Vol.7 No Spring

717A B G G 424A 51A A F 57

credibility WTO HR ITI Spring 2002 / No.47

国際文化20号.indd

橡24吉田和則.PDF

Transcription:

Hosono Toyoki 2012 11 6332 2008 33 8% 1 2012 9 1 12012 2008 2012 3.8%2008 7.4% 1 2 1 2008 2008 1 2012 2008 2012 2008 332 65,446,032 50.9% 206 60,589,084 47.1% 365 69,297,997 52.9% 173 59,597,520 45.5% U.S. Electoral College / U.S. National Archives and Records Administration http://www. archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/historical.html. No. 619 2013 3 16

20042008 2012 58.2%2008 3.4%2004 60.1% 2 2008 2012 2 18 295 20082012 5 2012 2008 3% 5 2012 4% 18 29 6% 3 29% 20122008 7%2008 52% 2 2008 2012 2008 2012 2008 2012 53% 53% 0% 56% 55% 1% 13% 13% 0% 95% 93% 2% 9% 10% 1% 67% 71% 4% 18 29 18% 19% 1% 66% 60% 6% 28% 29% 1% 50% 47% 3% 39% 38% 1% 89% 92% 3% 5 38% 41% 3% 60% 60% 0% 21% 18% 3% 59% 58% 1% 20082012 No. 619 2013 3 17

3 2011 20 24 16 16 16 16 % 14.6 9.3 7.5 17.9 14.1 2012 20122008 16 11.2 16 11.9 25 14.1 2010 25 9.4 25 4.3 Bureau of Labor Statistics http://www.bls.gov/cps/ cpsaat03.pdf; http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat07.pdf; http:// www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat06.pdf. 1 1990 2 2012 50 battleground states 2012 3 1 1 No. 619 2013 3 18

4820002012 7%7%7% 7% 3 1 2000 2012 1 7% 90% 90% 7% 7% 7% U.S. Electoral College / U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. 4 2008 2012 2012 2008 2012 2008 538 50.9% 52.9% 58.2% 61.6% 3.4% 9 51.5% 53.7% 70.3% 71.0% 0.7% 6 52.7% 55.5% 57.1% 57.0% 0.1% 6 52.2% 54.2% 69.9% 69.4% 0.5% 10 52.8% 56.4% 72.5% 72.4% 0.1% 18 50.7% 51.5% 64.6% 66.9% 2.4% 29 50.0% 51.0% 63.5% 66.1% 2.7% 13 51.3% 52.7% 66.4% 67.0% 0.7% 15 48.5% 49.9% 64.6% 65.5% 0.8% 20 52.1% 54.7% 59.4% 63.6% 4.2% 4 52.2% 54.4% 70.1% 71.7% 1.6% 20082012 1 0.1% U.S. Electoral College / U.S. National Archives and Records Administration http://www.archives.gov/ federal-register/electoral-college/historical.html. http://elections.gmu.edu/voter_turnout.htm No. 619 2013 3 19

1 2012 2012 2008 4 3 3 2012 2012 8% 9 7.8% 19489 9 7% 4 1984 4 2012 2012 9 8.7% 2011 20129 10.4% 2011 9 7.1% 5 6 2012 2012 12 7 8 No. 619 2013 3 20

8 2011 12 27 4 2012 20122 1 50% 22008 2012 5 61 1996 9 47 48% 101 1964 10 2 10 No. 619 2013 3 21

11 5 2008 2012 2 12 2012 2012 1980 2009 2012 12 4 13 No. 619 2013 3 22

2012 2012 13 2012 6 2012 14 2008 15 41%2%4 3 1 GM 8 1 2008 11 16 47% 2 No. 619 2013 3 23

2011 11 3economic patriotism 17 GM 1980 2004 2006 2012 9USA 2012 wine track beer track 5 Metropolitan Statistical AreaMSA MSA No. 619 2013 3 24

MSAMSA MSA2012MSA 2 IT 2008 Loudoun10%Arapahoe3.8%Osceola12% 2008 ascendents 1 212 1 7200 18 2 53 60 18 1946 19 2008 2 No. 619 2013 3 25

2008 IT 2012 IT 21 2120 20 201221 2008 2012 2 1 53 2 45 2 200 7 2337 2 VEP http://elections.gmu.edu/voter_turnout.htm. 3 2012 1984 9 7.3% 9 7%1976 1980 H W 1992 5 Bureau of Labor Statistics BLS, Local Area Unemployment Rate http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/lasst 12000003. 6 UPDATE 6: 2012 2012 7 2 http://www.tkfd.or.jp/research/project/news.php?id=988. 7 Xu Chen, Modeling the 2012 Presidential Race, Moody s Analytics, February 27, 2012 http://www.economy. com/dismal/article_free.asp?cid=228803&tid=5fcb4bbf-d759-422d-bd25-bff7d505d457. 8 Bruno Jerôme and Véronique Jerôme-Spezlari, Forecasting the 2012 US Presidential Election: Lessons from State-by-State Political Economy Model, PS: Political Science and Politics, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 663 668. 9 Glenn Thrush and Jonathan Martin, The End of the Line: Playbook 2012 ebook, New York: Random House, 2012, Location 222 251. 10 Lydia Saad, Obama Ahead in 10-Point Favorability Measure, 62% to 55%: Trends suggest this is not a perfect predictor of victory in the election, Gallup, November 1, 2012 http://www.gallup.com/poll/158465/obama- No. 619 2013 3 26

ahead-point-favorability-measure.aspx. 11 Glenn Thrush and Jonathan Martin, op. cit., Location 258 280. 12 UPDATE 4 2012 3 19 http://www.tkfd.or.jp/research/project/ news.php?id=922. 13 UPDATE 2 2012 2011 12 12 http://www.tkfd.or.jp/research/ project/news.php?id=851. 14 UPDATE 8 2012 10 30 http://www.tkfd.or.jp/research/project/news.php?id=1049. 15 2532.1% 23.2% 2000 16 Mitt Romney, Let Detroit Go Bankrupt, The New York Times, November 18, 2008 http://www. nytimes.com/2008/11/19/opinion/19romney.html?src=mv&_r=0#38;ref=general. 17 James R. Hagerty, Once Made in China: Jobs Trickle Back to U.S. Plants, WSJ.com, May 21, 2012 http:// online.wsj.com/article/sb10001424052702304587704577333482423070376.html. 18 60 filibuster 19 Dan Balz, Obama vs. Romney: The Take on Election 2012 The Washington Post ebook, New York: Diversion Books, 2012, Location 72 95. 20 Leslie Kaufman and Kate Zernike, Activists Fight Green Projects, Seeing U.N. Plot, The New York Times, February 3, 2012 http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/04/us/activists-fight-green-projects-seeing-un-plot.html? pagewanted=all. 2012 N R 2 % % % 2009 12% 134 67 67 88 72 99 63 17 0.77 0.67 0.66 0.38 0.32 0.16 0.72 0.54 83.13 19.27 104.21 132.33 97.41 35.23 77.94 80.60 0.56 0.63 0.49 0.96 0.22 0.45 0.25 0.71** 0.29 1.20 0.053 0.19 0.39 0.95 0.40 0.62 0.14 1.42 0.44 0.050 0.39 0.91 1.20 0.25 0.68 1.15 1.02 58.02 2.30 1.01 0.31 2.96 p 0.05 p 0.01 5%1% 2010 2000BLS No. 619 2013 3 27