35 1
36 3 709 2002 4 2 3
37 2005 : 45
38 3 2 1998 1998 211 2003 : 206
39 1999 2004
40 3 3
41 300 ha 100 m 3 m 2 1958 2002 11 159 404 1 8 20 7 57 21 15 208 100
42 3 Agamben 1995 2003 1 4 2002
43 2 1974
44 3!!!! 3 2002 : 14
45
46 3 2002 2 2
47 2003 4
48 3
49 5
50 3 100 1000 20 50 60 2003 4
51
52 3 2005 a 4 6 2001
53 2002 : 57 2002 : 202
54 3 1996 1978 : 39 1987 : 334 335
55 Arendt 1968 1972 2001 : 238 239
56 3 2005 b Agamben
57 citizen Agamben 1996 2000 : 31 citizen people 1 Agamben 1996 2000 : 35 Fraser, N. Fraser 1997 2003 Fraser 1997 2003 : 22 26 2005
58 3 2003 : 204 212 1978 387 : 36 39. Agamben, G., 1996, Mezzi Senza Fine, Bollati Boringhieri editore, Torino. 2000, 1995, Homo Sacer : il potere sovrano e la nuda vita, Giulio Einaudi editore S. p. A, Torino. 2003 1996 Arendt, H., 1968, Antisemitism, Imperialism, Totalitarianism, New York : Harcourt, Brace & World. 1972 2 Derrida, J., 1994, Force de Loi,Editions Galilee 1999 Fraser, N., 1997, Justice Interruptus : Critical Reflections on the Postsocialist condtion, Routledge Published. 2003 1998 12 191 224. 1999 5 : 91 103. 2003 2002 2001 52 3 : 413 429. 2005 a
59 15 16 B 88 97., 2005 b 2005 11 : 39 51. 2005 2002 2003 2004 10 : 131 144. 2001 238 239.
60 3 The Spheres Underlying the Legal System and Social Research Kiyoshi Kanebishi* Abstract Based on the principle of publicness that is established when private rights are eliminated, this article addresses the practical problem of whether it is possible to establish places that protect individual rights and secure public rights. The existence of the city as an actor assigns minority groups legitimate recognition (by the city) as minority groups, and a legitimacy is thereby constructed at the legal level that integrates cultural inequities and economic inequities. Specifically, it looks at how the city, as an actor, can achieve reconciliation amidst the tensions surrounding the breach of public standards of publicness that emerge between the nation (public institutions) and the residents (private lives) of the Nakamura district, currently the nation s largest illegal settlement, which is located on the grounds of the Osaka International Airport. To ensure that the residents of the Nakamura district will not be restigmatized by being compensated for their removal, it will be more practical for the city, as the actor of reconciliation, to recognize the actual (legal) rights of the residents by destroying the locality than by applying the law (Noise Prevention Law) on the grounds of the locality of the residents of the Nakamura district. By interpreting the situation while applying the current law to its maximum breadth, the administration, which is committed to upholding the legal system, is trying to consider the realistic possibility of creating aplace that specifically guarantees foreigner settlements and cultural diversity in Japan. Key words : unlawfulness, background of the legal system, publicness, narrative, legitimacy *Tohokugakuin University