2018 年第 1 回 日本語能力試験 結果の概要 The Japanese-Language Proficiency Test Summary of the Results July 2018 国際交流基金 THE JAPAN FOUNDATION 日本国際教育支援協会 JAPAN EDUCATI

Similar documents
2016 年第 2 回 (12 月 ) Ⅰ 2016 年第 2 回日本語能力試験実施概要報告 1. 目的日本国内及び海外において 日本語を母語としない者を対象として 日本語能力を測定し 認定することを目的とする 2. 主催者独立行政法人国際交流基金 公益財団法人日本国際教育支援協会 3. 試験の実施

THE JAPAN FOUNDATION JAPAN EDUCATIONAL EXCHANGES AND SERVICES

2018 年第 1 回 (7 月 ) Ⅰ 2018 年第 1 回日本語能力試験実施概要報告 1. 目的日本国内及び海外において 日本語を母語としない者を対象として 日本語能力を測定し 認定することを目的とする 2. 主催者独立行政法人国際交流基金 公益財団法人日本国際教育支援協会 3. 試験の実施国

THE JAPAN FOUNDATION JAPAN EDUCATIONAL EXCHANGES AND SERVICES

THE JAPAN FOUNDATION JAPAN EDUCATIONAL EXCHANGES AND SERVICES

E_JLPT_H1_H4_

Supplementary data

gude

C

第6回:データセットの結合

L3 Japanese (90570) 2008

第2回:データの加工・整理

Level 3 Japanese (90570) 2011


店舗の状況 Number of stores 国内コンビニエンスストアの店舗数の推移 Number of convenience stores in Japan * 2017 年度 /FY 年度 /FY 年度 ( 計画 )/FY2019 (Forecast) 20

Bull. of Nippon Sport Sci. Univ. 47 (1) Devising musical expression in teaching methods for elementary music An attempt at shared teaching

1402

A Nutritional Study of Anemia in Pregnancy Hematologic Characteristics in Pregnancy (Part 1) Keizo Shiraki, Fumiko Hisaoka Department of Nutrition, Sc

JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE ASSOCIATION FOR PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY VOL. 66, NO. 6 (Nov., 2001) (Received August 10, 2001; accepted November 9, 2001) Alterna

1308


1311

資料1-1(3)


L1 What Can You Blood Type Tell Us? Part 1 Can you guess/ my blood type? Well,/ you re very serious person/ so/ I think/ your blood type is A. Wow!/ G


<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>


Powered by TCPDF ( Title 初級レベルの授業報告 : 基幹コース3 科目を担当して Sub Title Author 中村, 愛 (Nakamura, Ai) Publisher 慶應義塾大学日本語 日本文化教育センター Publication 20

Visual Evaluation of Polka-dot Patterns Yoojin LEE and Nobuko NARUSE * Granduate School of Bunka Women's University, and * Faculty of Fashion Science,

ñ{ï 01-65

日本語教育紀要 7/pdf用 表紙


untitled

Corrections of the Results of Airborne Monitoring Surveys by MEXT and Ibaraki Prefecture

untitled

浜松医科大学紀要

Japanese Language NAT-TEST Summary of Results 2 1. はじめに 1. Introduction NAT-TEST 新しい試験会場のお知らせ Universitas Andalas Mahendra

16_.....E...._.I.v2006

How to read the marks and remarks used in this parts book. Section 1 : Explanation of Code Use In MRK Column OO : Interchangeable between the new part

How to read the marks and remarks used in this parts book. Section 1 : Explanation of Code Use In MRK Column OO : Interchangeable between the new part

How to read the marks and remarks used in this parts book. Section 1 : Explanation of Code Use In MRK Column OO : Interchangeable between the new part


52-2.indb

untitled

main.dvi

How to read the marks and remarks used in this parts book. Section 1 : Explanation of Code Use In MRK Column OO : Interchangeable between the new part

:. SPSS

untitled

49148

Page 1 of 6 B (The World of Mathematics) November 20, 2006 Final Exam 2006 Division: ID#: Name: 1. p, q, r (Let p, q, r are propositions. ) (10pts) (a

<8ED089EF8B D312D30914F95742E696E6464>

udc-2.dvi

10-渡部芳栄.indd


Microsoft Word - ??? ????????? ????? 2013.docx

Studies of Foot Form for Footwear Design (Part 9) : Characteristics of the Foot Form of Young and Elder Women Based on their Sizes of Ball Joint Girth

生研ニュースNo.132



IPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol.2016-CE-137 No /12/ e β /α α β β / α A judgment method of difficulty of task for a learner using simple


様式A

JSP.j...[.Xno.62.qxd

25 II :30 16:00 (1),. Do not open this problem booklet until the start of the examination is announced. (2) 3.. Answer the following 3 proble

学位研究17号

alternating current component and two transient components. Both transient components are direct currents at starting of the motor and are sinusoidal


Kyushu Communication Studies 第2号

Microsoft Word - PCM TL-Ed.4.4(特定電気用品適合性検査申込のご案内)

A pp CALL College Life CD-ROM Development of CD-ROM English Teaching Materials, College Life Series, for Improving English Communica


Yamagata Journal of Health Sciences, Vol. 16, 2013 Tamio KEITOKU 1 2 Katsuko TANNO 3 Kiyoko ARIMA 4 Noboru CHIBA 1 Abstract The present study aimed to



九州大学学術情報リポジトリ Kyushu University Institutional Repository 看護師の勤務体制による睡眠実態についての調査 岩下, 智香九州大学医学部保健学科看護学専攻 出版情報 : 九州大学医学部保健学



総研大文化科学研究第 11 号 (2015)


Journal of Geography 116 (6) Configuration of Rapid Digital Mapping System Using Tablet PC and its Application to Obtaining Ground Truth

elemmay09.pub

How to read the marks and remarks used in this parts book. Section 1 : Explanation of Code Use In MRK Column OO : Interchangeable between the new part


Juntendo Medical Journal

JJRM5005/04.短報.責了.indd

【生】④木原資裕先生【本文】/【生】④木原資裕先生【本文】

<8ED089EF8B D312D30914F95742E696E6464>


100sen_Eng_h1_4

untitled

_念3)医療2009_夏.indd

untitled

きずなプロジェクト-表紙.indd

地域共同体を基盤とした渇水管理システムの持続可能性


0701073‐立命‐社会システム15号/15‐9-招待-横井

Sin título

untitled

Study on Application of the cos a Method to Neutron Stress Measurement Toshihiko SASAKI*3 and Yukio HIROSE Department of Materials Science and Enginee

Transcription:

2018 年第 1 回 日本語能力試験 結果の概要 The ese-language Proficiency Test Summary of the Results July 2018 国際交流基金 THE JAPAN FOUNDATION 日本国際教育支援協会 JAPAN EDUCATIONAL EXCHANGES AND SERVICES

目 Contents 次 Ⅰ 2018 年第 1 回日本語能力試験実施概要報告 2 Overview of the ese-language Proficiency Test in 2018 (July) Ⅱ 2018 年第 1 回日本語能力試験実施結果 10 Results of the ese-language Proficiency Test in 2018 (July) 1. 応募者数 受験者数 認定者数及び認定率 10 Applicants, Examinees and Certification Results 2. 実施国 地域別応募者数 受験者数 11 Applicants and Examinees by Test Site 3. 受験上の配慮 15 Special Testing Accommodations 4. 平均点と標準偏差 16 Average Scores and Standard Deviations 5. 最高点と最低点 16 Highest and Lowest Scores 6. 尺度得点累積分布図 17 Cumulative Distribution of Scaled Scores Ⅲ 2009 年までの実施状況 23 Statistics for the Tests through 2009 Ⅳ 2010 年からの実施状況 24 Statistics for the Tests from 2010 1

Ⅰ 2018 年第 1 回日本語能力試験実施概要報告 1. 目的日本国内及び海外において 日本語を母語としない者を対象として 日本語能力を測定し 認定することを目的とする 2. 主催者独立行政法人国際交流基金 公益財団法人日本国際教育支援協会 3. 試験の実施国内においては日本国際教育支援協会が 海外においては国際交流基金 ( 台湾においては公益財団法人日本台湾交流協会と共催 ) が各地の実施共催機関の協力を得て 実施する 4. 試験の方法 内容等 (1) 対象原則として 日本語を母語としない者 (2) 試験日 2018 年 7 月 1 日 ( 日 ) (3) 実施地国内 :46 都道府県海外 :40 の国 地域の 135 都市 (4) 試験の構成及び認定の目安 N1~N5 の 5 レベル 各レベルの試験の構成は別表 1 認定の目安は別表 2 のとおり 5. 出願の手続き等 (1) 国内 1 出願 : ア. インターネットによる申込み日本国際教育支援協会の日本語能力試験ウェブサイトからMyJLPTに登録後 MyJLPTの 受験申込み 画面から申込む イ. 郵送による申込み所定の受験案内 ( 願書付き ) を購入し 日本語能力試験受付センターに提出する 2 受験料 :5,500 円 ( 消費税を含む ) 3 受付期間 : 2018 年 3 月 26 日 ( 月 )~4 月 25 日 ( 水 )( 郵送による申込みは当日消印有効 ) まで (2) 海外 1 出願 : 所定の願書 またはインターネット ( 一部の実施地 ) で 各地の実施共催機関が指定する方法により申込む 2 受験料 : 国際交流基金が各地の実施共催機関と協議の上 決定した金額 3 受付期間 : 国際交流基金が各地の実施共催機関と協議の上 決定した期間 6. 合否の判定と結果の発表等 (1 ) 合格点と基準点により レベルごとに合否を判定する 合格点と基準点は別表 3 のとおり 判定結果は 日本国内での受験者全員には 合否結果通知書 海外での受験者には 日本語能力試験認定結果及び成績に関する証明書 をもって通知するとともに 合格者には 日本語能力認定書 を交付する (2 ) 独立行政法人日本学生支援機構の主催による日本留学試験が実施されていない国 地域で受験する者で 日本の大学 短期大学 専修学校への留学を希望する者の成績については 合否結果の通知後 当該大学 学校からの照会があった場合には 日本国際教育支援協会を通じて通知する 2

Ⅰ Overview of the ese-language Proficiency Test in 2018(July) 1.Objective The ese-language Proficiency Test(JLPT)will be held both in and abroad to evaluate and certify proficiency in ese of non-native speakers. 2.Organizer The Foundation, Educational Exchanges and Services(JEES) 3.Administration of the Test JEES administers the test in., it is administered by the Foundation together with local host institutions.(in Taiwan, the Foundation and -Taiwan Exchange Association jointly administer the test.) 4.Outline of the Test (1)Eligibility: In principle, applicants should be non-native speakers of ese. (2)Test date: July 1(Sun.), 2018 (3)Test sites: In / 46 prefectures / 135 cities in 40 countries and areas (4)Test content and summary of linguistic competence required for each level Five levels: N1-N5. The contents of the test is shown on attached table 1 and summary of linguistic competence required for each level on attached table 2. 5.Application Procedures (1)In 1)Application Procedure: a. Application via the Internet: Applicants sign up for MyJLPT on JEES website and register JLPT application information. b. Application by mail:applicants obtain the designated application form and submit it to the JLPT Application Center. 2)Test Fee: 5,500(consumption tax included) 3)Application period: From March 26(Mon.)to April 25(Wed.), 2018(Application by mail must be postmarked on or before April 25) (2) 1)Application Procedure: 2)Test Fee: 3)Application period: Apply by using the designated application form or via the Internet (in certain test venue cities)according to the method specified by the local host institution of the test venue. Test fee is determined by the Foundation, in consultation with each local host institution. Application period is determined by the Foundation, in consultation with each local host institution. 6.Announcement of Results (1)Pass or fail for each level will be determined based on the overall pass mark and sectional pass marks. Overall pass marks and sectional pass marks are shown on Table 3. A Score Report will be sent to each examinee who took the test in and a ese- Language Proficiency Test Certificate of Results and Scores will be sent to each examinee who took the test outside of. Those examinees who successfully pass the test will receive a Certificate of ese-language Proficiency. (2)For an examinee who takes the JLPT abroad where the Student Services Organization (JASSO)does not administer the Examination for ese University Admission for International Students, JEES will send the examinee s score to a university or a junior college upon request after score reports are sent to each examinee. 3

別表 1 試験の構成 レベル 試験科目 試験時間 得 点 区 分 言語知識 ( 文字 語彙 文法 ) 言語知識 ( 文字 語彙 文法 ) 読解 110 分 読解 N1 聴解 60 分 聴解 総合得点 言語知識 ( 文字 語彙 文法 ) 言語知識 ( 文字 語彙 文法 ) 読解 105 分 読解 N2 聴解 50 分 聴解 総合得点 得点の範囲 ( 等化による尺度得点 ) 0~ 60 点 0~ 60 点 0~ 60 点 0~180 点 0~ 60 点 0~ 60 点 0~ 60 点 0~180 点 言語知識 ( 文字 語彙 ) 30 分 言語知識 ( 文字 語彙 文法 ) 0~ 60 点 N3 言語知識 ( 文法 ) 読解聴解 70 分 40 分 読解聴解 0~ 60 点 0~ 60 点 総合得点 0~180 点 N4 言語知識 ( 文字 語彙 ) 言語知識 ( 文法 ) 読解聴解 30 分 60 分 35 分 言語知識 ( 文字 語彙 文法 ) 読解聴解 0~120 点 0~ 60 点 総合得点 0~180 点 N5 言語知識 ( 文字 語彙 ) 言語知識 ( 文法 ) 読解聴解 25 分 50 分 30 分 言語知識 ( 文字 語彙 文法 ) 読解聴解 0~120 点 0~ 60 点 総合得点 0~180 点 Table 1 Contents of Test Level Test Sections Test Time Scoring Sections Range of Scores (scaled scores) N1 Language Knowledge (Vocabulary/Grammar)& Reading Listening 110 min. 60 min. Language Knowledge(Vocabulary/Grammar) Reading Listening 0~ 60 points 0~ 60 points 0~ 60 points Score 0~180 points N2 Language Knowledge (Vocabulary/Grammar)& Reading Listening 105 min. 50 min. Language Knowledge(Vocabulary/Grammar) Reading Listening 0~ 60 points 0~ 60 points 0~ 60 points Score 0~180 points Language Knowledge(Vocabulary) 30 min. Language Knowledge(Vocabulary/Grammar) 0~ 60 points N3 Language Knowledge(Grammar)& Reading Listening 70 min. 40 min. Reading Listening 0~ 60 points 0~ 60 points Score 0~180 points N4 Language Knowledge(Vocabulary) Language Knowledge(Grammar)& Reading Listening 30 min. 60 min. 35 min. Language Knowledge (Vocabulary/Grammar)& Reading Listening 0~120 points 0~ 60 points Score 0~180 points N5 Language Knowledge(Vocabulary) Language Knowledge(Grammar)& Reading Listening 25 min. 50 min. 30 min. Language Knowledge (Vocabulary/Grammar)& Reading Listening 0~120 points 0~ 60 points Score 0~180 points 4

別表 2 認定の目安 レベル認定の目安 幅広い場面で使われる日本語を理解することができる N1 読む 聞く 幅広い話題について書かれた新聞の論説 評論など 論理的にやや複雑な文章や抽象度の高い文章などを読んで 文章の構成や内容を理解することができる さまざまな話題の内容に深みのある読み物を読んで 話の流れや詳細な表現意図を理解することができる 幅広い場面において自然なスピードの まとまりのある会話やニュース 講義を聞いて 話の流れや内容 登場人物の関係や内容の論理構成などを詳細に理解したり 要旨を把握したりすることができる 日常的な場面で使われる日本語の理解に加え より幅広い場面で使われる日本語をある程度理解することができる N2 読む 聞く 幅広い話題について書かれた新聞や雑誌の記事 解説 平易な評論など 論旨が明快な文章を読んで文章の内容を理解することができる 一般的な話題に関する読み物を読んで 話の流れや表現意図を理解することができる 日常的な場面に加えて幅広い場面で 自然に近いスピードの まとまりのある会話やニュースを聞いて 話の流れや内容 登場人物の関係を理解したり 要旨を把握したりすることができる 日常的な場面で使われる日本語をある程度理解することができる N3 読む 聞く 日常的な話題について書かれた具体的な内容を表す文章を 読んで理解することができる 新聞の見出しなどから情報の概要をつかむことができる 日常的な場面で目にする難易度がやや高い文章は 言い換え表現が与えられれば 要旨を理解することができる 日常的な場面で やや自然に近いスピードのまとまりのある会話を聞いて 話の具体的な内容を登場人物の関係などとあわせてほぼ理解できる 基本的な日本語を理解することができる N4 読む 聞く 基本的な語彙や漢字を使って書かれた日常生活の中でも身近な話題の文章を 読んで理解することができる 日常的な場面で ややゆっくりと話される会話であれば 内容がほぼ理解できる 基本的な日本語をある程度理解することができる N5 読む 聞く ひらがなやカタカナ 日常生活で用いられる基本的な漢字で書かれた定型的な語句や文 文章を読んで理解することができる 教室や 身の回りなど 日常生活の中でもよく出会う場面で ゆっくり話される短い会話であれば 必要な情報を聞き取ることができる ー 5 ー

Table 2 Summary of Linguistic Competence Required for Each Level Level Summary of Linguistic Competence Required for Each Level The ability to understand ese used in a variety of circumstances. Reading One is able to read writings with logical complexity and/or abstract writings on a variety of topics, such as newspaper editorials and critiques, and comprehend both their structures and contents. N1 One is also able to read written materials with profound contents on various topics and follow their narratives as well as understand the intent of the writers comprehensively. Listening One is able to comprehend orally presented materials such as coherent conversations, news reports, and lectures, spoken at natural speed in a broad variety of settings, and is able to follow their ideas and comprehend their contents comprehensively. One is also able to understand the details of the presented materials such as the relationships among the people involved, the logical structures, and the essential points. The ability to understand ese used in everyday situations, and in a variety of circumstances to a certain degree. Reading One is able to read materials written clearly on a variety of topics, such as articles and commentaries in newspapers and magazines as well as simple critiques, and comprehend their contents. N2 One is also able to read written materials on general topics and follow their narratives as well as understand the intent of the writers. Listening One is able to comprehend orally presented materials such as coherent conversations and news reports, spoken at nearly natural speed in everyday situations as well as in a variety of settings, and is able to follow their ideas and comprehend their contents. One is also able to understand the relationships among the people involved and the essential points of the presented materials. The ability to understand ese used in everyday situations to a certain degree. Reading One is able to read and understand written materials with specific contents concerning everyday topics. One is also able to grasp summary information such as newspaper headlines. N3 In addition, one is also able to read slightly difficult writings encountered in everyday situations and understand the main points of the content if some alternative phrases are available to aid one s understanding. Listening One is able to listen and comprehend coherent conversations in everyday situations, spoken at near-natural speed, and is generally able to follow their contents as well as grasp the relationships among the people involved. The ability to understand basic ese. N4 Reading One is able to read and understand passages on familiar daily topics written in basic vocabulary and kanji. Listening One is able to listen and comprehend conversations encountered in daily life and generally follow their contents, provided that they are spoken slowly. The ability to understand some basic ese. N5 Reading One is able to read and understand typical expressions and sentences written in hiragana, katakana, and basic kanji. Listening One is able to listen and comprehend conversations about topics regularly encountered in daily life and classroom situations, and is able to pick up necessary information from short conversations spoken slowly. ー 6 ー

別表 3 各レベルの合格点と基準点 N1 0~180 点 100 点 0~60 点 19 点 0~60 点 19 点 0~60 点 19 点 N2 0~180 点 90 点 0~60 点 19 点 0~60 点 19 点 0~60 点 19 点 N3 0~180 点 95 点 0~60 点 19 点 0~60 点 19 点 0~60 点 19 点 N4 N5 0~180 点 0~180 点 90 点 80 点 0~120 点 0~120 点 0~60 点 0~60 点 得点は 等化によって得られる尺度得点で表示する 合格するためには 1 総合得点が合格点以上であること 2 各得点区分の得点が基準点以上であること の二つが必要である 一つでも基準点に達していない得点区分がある場合は 総合得点がどんなに高くても不合格となる 38 点 38 点 19 点 19 点 Table 3 Overall Pass Marks and Sectional Pass Marks for Each Level N1 0~180 points 100 points 0~60 points 19 points 0~60 points 19 points 0~60 points 19 points N2 0~180 points 90 points 0~60 points 19 points 0~60 points 19 points 0~60 points 19 points N3 0~180 points 95 points 0~60 points 19 points 0~60 points 19 points 0~60 points 19 points N4 0~180 points 90 points 0~120 points 38 points 0~60 points 19 points N5 0~180 points 80 points 0~120 points 38 points 0~60 points 19 points JLPT scores are shown as scaled scores that are obtained using the equation method. In order to pass, (1) total score needs to be at or above the overall pass mark and (2) score in each scoring section needs to be at or above the sectional pass mark. If there is even one scoring section where the score is below the sectional pass mark, examinees are determined to have failed, no matter how high the total score he/she might have. 合格点の設定について今の試験の合否判定水準は 統計分析の結果を踏まえ 2009 年までの試験 ( 旧試験 ) の合否判定水準と整合性をもつように設定されています これにより 旧試験の 1 級 2 級 3 級 4 級に合格できる日本語能力をもった受験者は それぞれ今の試験のN1 N2 N4 N5に合格できる日本語能力をもっていると解釈することが可能です 旧試験での対応級が存在しない N3については 旧試験の 2 級と3 級の合否判定水準における日本語能力レベルを統計学的に分析し 旧試験の 2 級と3 級の合否判定水準の間に N3の合格点が収まるように設定されています Setting Passing Points The passing standard for the current test is based on statistical analysis and designed to match that of the test through 2009 (old test). Examinees able to pass Levels 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the old test are judged to have the ese-language proficiency to be able to pass N1, N2, N4 and N5 in the current test. As for N3, there was no corresponding level in the old test, and passing scores for N3 are designed to fall between the passing standards of the old test s Levels 2 and 3, based on statistical analysis of ese-language proficiency levels for passing these levels. 7

尺度得点について 2010 年から導入された 尺度得点 とは 受験者の日本語能力と試験結果 ( 得点 ) を より公平に対応づけるため 共通の尺度 ( ものさし ) に基づいて表示した得点です 尺度得点を利用することで いつの試験を受験したかにかかわらず 常に同一の基準の下で日本語能力を測定することが可能になります 以下に尺度得点の利点と算出過程について説明します 尺度得点の利点 試験問題の難易度を異なる試験の間で完全に一定に保つことは 試験問題作成の過程において専門家による綿密な分析 検討を経たとしても極めて困難です このため 受験者が正答した問題の配点を単純に加算する 素点 をテスト得点とすると テスト得点は試験の難易度に依存することになります 受験の時期が異なり 試験問題の難易度が異なっている場合には 同じ日本語能力の受験者であってもそれぞれの試験のテスト得点は同一にはなりません そのため 素点で受験者の日本語能力を表した場合には 試験問題の難易度に影響を受け 素点が日本語能力の実態を適切に反映しなくなる可能性について考慮しなければなりません これに対して 尺度得点 には 試験の難易度と独立して日本語能力を評価し 統一の尺度に基づいて数値化できる という 能力測定の方法論上 大変有益な特長があります この特長により 受験者の日本語能力が同じならば いつの試験を受験しても 同一のテスト得点を返すことが可能になっています 尺度得点の導入により 同じレベルならば 2 つの異なる試験で算出された 尺度得点の差 を 日本語能力の差 として 試験の難易度から独立して解釈することが可能になります 尺度得点の算出過程 試験の難易度に依存しないテスト得点 ( 尺度得点 ) を算出する具体的な手続きは 項目応答理論 (Item Response Theory; IRT) という統計的テスト理論に基づいています この手続きは 正答数に基づいたテスト得点 ( 素点 ) の算出法とは全く異なります 尺度得点は どの問題にどのように解答しているか ( 正答か誤答か ) すなわち 解答のパターン によって数理的に決定されます 例えば 10 問 ( 項目 ) の試験問題で構成される試験では 最大で 1024 通り (2 10 通り ) の解答パターンが存在します 日本語能力試験の尺度得点算出の過程では これらの解答パターンに基づいて受験者の日本語能力を ひとつの得点区分につき 0~60 点 (N4 N5 の 言語知識 ( 文字 語彙 文法 ) 読解 では 0~120 点 ) の尺度上に位置付けていきます 10 問の場合で最大で 1024 通りある解答パターン ( 実際の試験ではもっと多くなります ) を 61 のグループに分類するのですから 互いに異なる解答パターンに対して 同一の尺度得点になる場合も生じてきます したがって ある 2 名の受験者について 互いに正答数や解答パターンは違っていても 尺度得点が同一になる場合もあります 逆に 正答数は同一であっても解答パターンが異なるため 尺度得点が異なる場合もあります 尺度得点の算出過程に関する詳細については下記の文献を参照してください 文献 池田央 (1994) 現代テスト理論 朝倉書店豊田秀樹 (2002) 項目反応理論 [ 入門編 ] - テストと測定の科学 - 朝倉書店渡辺直登 野口裕之 ( 編 )(1999) 組織心理測定論 - 項目反応理論のフロンティア - 白桃書房 ー 8 ー

Scaled Scores Scaled scores that have been adopted in 2010 are based on a common scale in order to make test results (scores) correspond to examinees ese-language proficiency in a more fair manner. Scaled scores enable measurement of ese-language proficiency based on the same consistent standard regardless of when the test is taken. The advantages and calculation method of scaled scores are summarized below. Advantages of scaled scores Perfectly maintaining the level of difficulty of questions among different tests is extremely difficult even if thorough analysis and discussion by experts are conducted during the question design phase. With raw scores, which are obtained simply by adding the allocated points of correctly answered questions, test scores are dependent on the difficulty of exams. When exam timing and difficulty of exam questions differ, test scores will vary for examinees with the same ese-language proficiency. Since examinees ese-language proficiency as expressed in raw scores is affected by the difficulty of exams, it is necessary to consider the possibility that raw scores do not appropriately reflect actual ese-language proficiency. On the other hand, scaled scores hold great benefit for proficiency measurement methodology the ability to evaluate ese-language proficiency independently from exam difficulty and quantify it based on a standard scale. This characteristic allows examinees with the same ese-language proficiency to receive the same scores regardless of when they take the test. The introduction of scaled scores also allows the difference in scaled scores calculated for two different tests to be interpreted separately from exam difficulty as the difference in ese-language proficiency as long as exams are for the same level. Calculation method of scaled scores Calculation of test scores not affected by the difficulty of exams (scaled scores) is based on a statistical test theory called Item Response Theory (IRT). This is completely different from calculation of raw test scores based on the number of correct answers. Scaled scores are determined mathematically based on answering patterns of how examinees answer particular questions (correctly or incorrectly). For example, a test consisting of 10 questions (items) has a maximum of 1024 answering patterns (2 10 patterns). For the scaled-score calculation process for the JLPT, based on these answering patterns ese-language proficiency of examinees is positioned on a scale between 0 and 60 points for one scoring section (0-120 points for Language Knowledge [Vocabulary/Grammar] & Reading for N4 and N5). Because the maximum 1024 answering patterns of a test consisting of 10 questions (actual exams have more questions) are categorized into 61 groups, scaled scores sometimes become identical for different answering patterns. Therefore, scaled scores can be identical for two examinees even when the number of questions they correctly answer or their answering pattern does not match. On the other hand, scaled scores may not be identical even though the number of correctly answered questions is the same when answering patterns are different. For more details on the calculation method of scaled scores, please refer to the following references. References Ikeda, H. (1994) Gendai Tesuto Riron [Modern Testing Theory]. Tokyo: Asakura Publishing. Toyoda, H. (2002) Komoku Hanno Riron Nyumon-hen Tesuto to Sokutei no Kagaku [Item Response Theory Introduction Test and Measurement Science], Tokyo: Asakura Publishing. Watanabe, N. & Noguchi, H. (eds.) (1999) Soshiki Shinrigaku Sokuteiron Komoku Hanno Riron no Furontia [Organizational Psychology Measurement Theory Frontier of Item Response Theory], Tokyo: Hakuto-Shobo Publishing Company. ー 9 ー

Ⅱ 2018 年第 1 回日本語能力試験実施結果 (July) Results of the ese-language Proficiency Test in 2018 1. 応募者数 受験者数 認定者数及び認定率 Applicants, Examinees and Certification Results applicants examinees certified % Percentage certified applicants examinees certified % Percentage certified applicants examinees certified % Percentage certified N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 40,718 58,763 61,878 18,218 3,251 182,828 34,982 50,787 47,820 15,887 2,791 152,267 36,791 54,619 58,126 16,737 2,903 169,176 31,677 47,316 44,847 14,809 2,527 141,176 12,488 17,994 17,547 5,126 1,836 54,991 11,100 18,145 13,296 5,084 1,629 49,254 33.9% 32.9% 30.2% 30.6% 63.2% 32.5% 35.0% 38.3% 29.6% 34.3% 64.5% 34.9% 80,896 105,171 71,951 51,353 51,990 361,361 74,034 94,523 62,494 43,995 39,094 314,140 68,235 89,320 58,417 42,468 42,463 300,903 63,021 80,933 50,635 36,193 32,148 262,930 22,494 37,326 26,691 14,412 20,768 121,691 20,861 38,216 22,560 14,135 17,180 112,952 33.0% 41.8% 45.7% 33.9% 48.9% 40.4% 33.1% 47.2% 44.6% 39.1% 53.4% 43.0% 121,614 163,934 133,829 69,571 55,241 544,189 109,016 145,310 110,314 59,882 41,885 466,407 Notes 1. 2. 1. Figures in parentheses indicate those in the same time test last year. 2. The number of examinees includes those who took only some of the test sections. 105,026 143,939 116,543 59,205 45,366 470,079 94,698 128,249 95,482 51,002 34,675 404,106 34,982 55,320 44,238 19,538 22,604 176,682 31,961 56,361 35,836 19,219 18,809 162,206 33.3% 38.4% 38.0% 33.0% 49.8% 37.6% 33.8% 43.9% 37.6% 37.7% 54.2% 40.1% 10

2. 実施国 地域別応募者数 受験者数 Applicants and Examinees by Test Site N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 Countries and Cities areas A B A B A B A B A B A B Hokkaido 582 517 567 524 671 635 212 205 63 58 2,095 1,939 Aomori 84 81 103 100 155 149 28 23 12 8 382 361 Iwate 56 50 117 114 196 190 82 77 8 8 459 439 Miyagi 346 294 713 634 897 851 260 244 26 23 2,242 2,046 Akita 59 57 34 33 39 38 18 17 7 7 157 152 Yamagata 68 67 71 70 122 107 52 49 7 4 320 297 Fukushima 79 72 225 216 510 495 170 159 35 30 1,019 972 Ibaraki 391 350 609 570 1,101 1,040 723 688 50 46 2,874 2,694 Tochigi 302 268 679 643 1,452 1,351 708 670 69 59 3,210 2,991 Gunma 255 226 735 696 1,087 1,016 450 419 74 69 2,601 2,426 Saitama 1,164 1,045 2,010 1,866 2,832 2,655 739 685 97 83 6,842 6,334 Chiba 1,143 1,042 3,522 3,277 4,014 3,745 953 701 142 122 9,774 8,887 Tokyo 16,464 14,699 21,371 19,547 14,070 13,028 1,840 1,550 690 583 54,435 49,407 Kanagawa 3,808 3,378 3,302 3,096 3,423 3,184 813 755 228 188 11,574 10,601 Niigata 322 308 361 328 332 304 148 134 18 18 1,181 1,092 Toyama 164 154 210 203 517 507 191 189 31 31 1,113 1,084 Ishikawa 425 382 326 299 542 507 341 315 43 40 1,677 1,543 Fukui 104 91 126 121 217 212 89 88 11 11 547 523 Yamanashi 189 181 218 210 234 227 123 119 16 16 780 753 Nagano 164 146 371 357 650 630 291 269 17 16 1,493 1,418 Gifu 217 201 551 517 955 916 334 323 89 79 2,146 2,036 Shizuoka 576 533 1,214 1,165 1,894 1,832 770 717 188 174 4,642 4,421 Aichi 1,722 1,572 3,329 3,155 4,789 4,450 2,049 1,896 323 279 12,212 11,352 Mie 234 215 492 467 860 817 359 340 88 84 2,033 1,923 Shiga 258 236 238 229 499 475 322 306 36 34 1,353 1,280 Kyoto 1,552 1,433 1,476 1,394 920 863 328 294 59 55 4,335 4,039 Osaka 4,167 3,775 5,897 5,419 4,463 4,198 1,089 1,037 169 160 15,785 14,589 Hyogo 963 889 2,030 1,909 2,268 2,133 808 765 108 101 6,177 5,797 Nara 153 142 166 161 302 290 97 91 16 14 734 698 Wakayama 86 85 121 119 139 132 81 77 6 6 433 419 Tottori 60 56 73 71 142 137 28 26 2 1 305 291 Shimane 52 48 54 53 187 178 53 51 40 38 386 368 Okayama 556 523 787 741 1,000 935 345 319 58 56 2,746 2,574 Hiroshima 614 574 869 833 1,541 1,463 635 608 65 60 3,724 3,538 Yamaguchi 154 147 222 206 587 560 220 210 8 8 1,191 1,131 Tokushima 90 85 117 107 115 107 40 38 2 1 364 338 Kagawa 131 115 203 183 376 360 163 153 54 54 927 865 Ehime 128 122 192 186 408 396 143 139 15 14 886 857 Kochi 105 96 128 120 196 181 101 90 34 31 564 518 Fukuoka 1,605 1,479 3,373 3,190 4,923 4,691 816 735 96 92 10,813 10,187 Saga 83 78 210 203 412 390 206 198 10 10 921 879 Nagasaki 329 312 216 204 463 417 233 221 34 33 1,275 1,187 Kumamoto 167 156 270 262 442 429 212 204 12 10 1,103 1,061 Oita 325 304 423 399 342 329 248 242 27 23 1,365 1,297 Miyazaki 56 49 144 136 262 254 143 141 49 47 654 627 Kagoshima 166 158 298 286 332 322 164 160 19 19 979 945 46 46 prefectures in 40,718 36,791 58,763 54,619 61,878 58,126 18,218 16,737 3,251 2,903 182,828 169,176 A: applicants B: examinees Notes The number of examinees includes those who took only some of the test sections. 11

Countries and areas Korea China Cities N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 A B A B A B A B A B A B Seoul 6,040 4,718 5,477 4,300 5,204 3,695 1,497 1,023 893 648 19,111 14,384 Busan 1,411 1,145 1,506 1,255 1,545 1,165 385 286 217 166 5,064 4,017 Jeonju 245 205 271 218 149 121 90 72 30 21 785 637 Jeju 109 90 123 92 137 106 36 27 14 13 419 328 Incheon 631 515 500 412 619 469 387 255 0 0 2,137 1,651 Suwon 630 526 570 492 575 446 373 258 0 0 2,148 1,722 Seongnam 540 450 595 472 550 408 193 123 0 0 1,878 1,453 Anyang 608 494 596 494 611 442 198 134 0 0 2,013 1,564 Cheonan 219 177 370 298 385 274 158 109 92 66 1,224 924 Cheongju 186 151 242 201 168 135 106 62 54 37 756 586 Daejeon 584 500 665 544 407 315 180 134 59 47 1,895 1,540 Gwangju 413 345 470 377 299 250 150 111 51 38 1,383 1,121 Chuncheon 155 137 127 101 141 102 53 41 28 20 504 401 Goyang 511 427 583 498 538 416 179 131 0 0 1,811 1,472 Bucheon 482 396 478 405 510 394 0 0 0 0 1,470 1,195 Wonju 145 121 185 164 118 101 78 63 36 28 562 477 Gimhae 117 98 130 108 153 127 51 39 0 0 451 372 Yangsan 72 60 68 56 89 71 29 22 0 0 258 209 Daegu 743 634 941 779 944 742 237 169 145 114 3,010 2,438 Gumi 90 76 110 93 134 101 71 52 0 0 405 322 Changwon 269 233 312 265 322 233 117 93 0 0 1,020 824 Jinju 94 81 126 99 136 109 64 46 0 0 420 335 Ulsan 235 208 264 227 299 243 104 82 0 0 902 760 Pohang 98 81 83 69 100 81 35 27 0 0 316 258 14,627 11,868 14,792 12,019 14,133 10,546 4,771 3,359 1,619 1,198 49,942 38,990 Beijing 4,585 3,627 5,610 4,279 1,500 1,021 200 138 200 139 12,095 9,204 Shanghai 5,804 4,623 6,730 5,363 3,065 2,194 1,076 798 587 433 17,262 13,411 Changchun 916 795 1,628 1,441 403 294 0 0 0 0 2,947 2,530 Dalian 3,734 3,258 5,735 5,157 698 546 220 181 92 74 10,479 9,216 Guangzhou 5,500 4,638 6,000 5,132 2,927 2,155 500 374 455 335 15,382 12,634 Shenyang 1,221 1,058 1,603 1,401 473 359 153 104 98 64 3,548 2,986 Tianjin 1,500 1,330 1,250 1,136 200 170 100 85 100 81 3,150 2,802 Haerbin 866 780 1,199 1,073 300 219 0 0 0 0 2,365 2,072 Xian 1,971 1,625 1,999 1,724 900 693 200 183 100 75 5,170 4,300 Chongqing 1,130 989 642 556 304 236 76 58 38 26 2,190 1,865 Jinan 927 767 1,199 1,025 584 427 246 205 97 66 3,053 2,490 Wuhan 2,040 1,788 2,960 2,550 300 245 150 137 150 104 5,600 4,824 Xiamen 1,044 854 1,169 956 459 331 102 67 46 31 2,820 2,239 Hangzhou 2,058 1,765 1,938 1,662 500 400 300 232 200 143 4,996 4,202 Huhehaote 262 226 420 343 144 107 66 50 20 14 912 740 Luoyang 120 111 120 113 60 49 0 0 0 0 300 273 Suzhou 1,548 1,296 1,709 1,407 829 610 412 328 198 157 4,696 3,798 Qingdao 945 800 1,140 959 526 403 185 148 78 50 2,874 2,360 Changsha 1,939 1,593 2,100 1,870 569 488 150 136 60 41 4,818 4,128 Chengdu 690 604 1,430 1,257 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,120 1,861 Nanjing 2,191 1,870 3,095 2,614 1,256 901 450 346 130 86 7,122 5,817 Hefei 788 649 1,117 896 493 354 174 113 0 0 2,572 2,012 Shenzhen 690 570 982 794 30 26 30 26 30 28 1,762 1,444 Nanchang 808 709 1,371 1,146 435 304 141 98 54 35 2,809 2,292 Shijiazhuang 450 390 450 399 45 31 45 32 0 0 990 852 Taiyuan 474 414 500 437 258 167 92 52 40 27 1,364 1,097 Ningbo 784 615 1,172 938 600 447 295 215 100 96 2,951 2,311 Wuxi 836 699 1,175 1,018 414 322 281 243 62 39 2,768 2,321 Guiyang 300 243 450 359 180 127 60 46 56 40 1,046 815 Wulumuqi 89 66 131 86 94 50 42 24 24 11 380 237 Nanning 499 408 738 592 189 130 73 58 35 24 1,534 1,212 Weifang 93 77 230 180 69 59 45 35 0 0 437 351 Yangzhou 293 236 383 313 160 113 53 34 30 20 919 716 Kunming 400 312 400 340 90 61 30 20 30 22 950 755 Haikou 223 201 335 283 109 76 31 19 13 7 711 586 Yanji 184 157 141 121 47 29 59 36 0 0 431 343 Lanzhou 234 188 419 324 195 126 86 65 36 25 970 728 Baoding 979 927 577 493 289 200 142 94 90 57 2,077 1,771 Nantong 347 293 441 358 235 199 75 55 53 41 1,151 946 Xining 37 27 78 66 44 34 20 17 8 7 187 151 Fuzhou 560 484 908 775 268 196 45 28 28 21 1,809 1,504 Weihai 300 263 300 277 242 210 60 49 0 0 902 799 Subtotal 50,359 42,325 61,974 52,213 20,483 15,109 6,465 4,929 3,338 2,419 142,619 116,995 Hong Kong 1,372 1,232 1,414 1,249 1,151 1,031 1,333 1,140 1,490 1,323 6,760 5,975 Macau 86 77 88 80 56 49 39 34 28 23 297 263 51,817 43,634 63,476 53,542 21,690 16,189 7,837 6,103 4,856 3,765 149,676 123,233 A: applicants B: examinees Notes The number of examinees includes those who took only some of the test sections. 12

Countries and areas Taiwan Cities N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 A B A B A B A B A B A B Taipei 4,758 4,373 4,940 4,583 4,738 4,273 3,419 3,023 2,696 2,450 20,551 18,702 Kaohsiung 1,365 1,269 1,803 1,708 1,825 1,716 1,474 1,342 1,312 1,196 7,779 7,231 Taichung 1,480 1,381 1,736 1,628 1,889 1,742 1,776 1,631 1,636 1,524 8,517 7,906 Taoyuan 863 814 1,175 1,109 1,251 1,176 1,113 1,037 1,096 1,006 5,498 5,142 8,466 7,837 9,654 9,028 9,703 8,907 7,782 7,033 6,740 6,176 42,345 38,981 East Asia 74,910 63,339 87,922 74,589 45,526 35,642 20,390 16,495 13,215 11,139 241,963 201,204 Indonesia Cambodia Singapore Thailand Philippines Vietnam Malaysia Myanmar Jakarta 278 217 818 646 1,401 1,103 1,236 933 1,253 932 4,986 3,831 Bandung 70 58 270 224 425 348 414 341 301 237 1,480 1,208 Surabaya 38 31 129 113 288 257 275 244 250 207 980 852 Malang 28 25 88 78 173 153 252 225 103 89 644 570 Semarang 39 30 170 150 414 358 370 322 356 290 1,349 1,150 Makassar 4 4 24 18 86 66 100 69 106 78 320 235 457 365 1,499 1,229 2,787 2,285 2,647 2,134 2,369 1,833 9,759 7,846 Phnom Penh 53 47 227 209 429 410 387 355 229 206 1,325 1,227 Singapore 262 233 319 286 362 323 529 470 597 530 2,069 1,842 Bangkok 1,092 880 2,362 1,999 2,919 2,457 3,329 2,713 3,144 2,673 12,846 10,722 Chiang Mai 35 28 133 118 266 243 493 451 443 404 1,370 1,244 1,127 908 2,495 2,117 3,185 2,700 3,822 3,164 3,587 3,077 14,216 11,966 Manila 105 90 369 320 646 554 1,847 1,557 2,229 1,969 5,196 4,490 Cebu 17 12 42 37 118 100 325 287 279 227 781 663 Davao 25 24 47 46 142 132 368 313 543 458 1,125 973 147 126 458 403 906 786 2,540 2,157 3,051 2,654 7,102 6,126 Hanoi 1,395 1,147 4,578 3,942 6,562 5,746 4,276 3,646 2,050 1,717 18,861 16,198 Ho Chi Minh 809 654 2,993 2,560 4,934 4,334 4,704 4,116 3,435 2,913 16,875 14,577 Da Nang 156 130 519 474 680 607 852 737 629 545 2,836 2,493 Hue 21 20 135 125 251 245 236 226 115 105 758 721 2,381 1,951 8,225 7,101 12,427 10,932 10,068 8,725 6,229 5,280 39,330 33,989 Kuala Lumpur 132 105 280 261 371 348 276 246 609 560 1,668 1,520 Penang 15 13 28 27 45 40 72 64 180 168 340 312 147 118 308 288 416 388 348 310 789 728 2,008 1,832 Yangon 289 240 968 819 2,052 1,700 4,249 3,316 5,826 4,027 13,384 10,102 Mandalay 71 56 228 201 321 259 718 584 1,414 1,030 2,752 2,130 360 296 1,196 1,020 2,373 1,959 4,967 3,900 7,240 5,057 16,136 12,232 Southeast Asia 4,934 4,044 14,727 12,653 22,885 19,783 25,308 21,215 24,091 19,365 91,945 77,060 India Sri Lanka Nepal Bangladesh New Delhi 126 91 502 404 801 704 1,005 869 1,632 1,266 4,066 3,334 Pune 32 27 170 140 425 365 642 507 1,662 1,276 2,931 2,315 Kolkata 5 4 11 7 39 32 100 84 608 555 763 682 Chennai 28 22 116 99 312 256 827 727 1,858 1,545 3,141 2,649 Mumbai 29 24 86 69 181 147 303 230 501 373 1,100 843 Santiniketan 4 3 35 34 70 63 80 77 78 72 267 249 224 171 920 753 1,828 1,567 2,957 2,494 6,339 5,087 12,268 10,072 Colombo 26 23 77 66 123 109 420 370 1,511 1,304 2,157 1,872 Kathmandu 9 9 21 20 57 45 159 134 2,344 1,902 2,590 2,110 Dhaka 10 9 11 8 14 10 93 70 1,948 1,548 2,076 1,645 South Asia 269 212 1,029 847 2,022 1,731 3,629 3,068 12,142 9,841 19,091 15,699 Australia New Zealand Canada Canberra 54 40 71 53 41 31 33 26 37 24 236 174 Brisbane 36 26 46 39 56 38 54 45 44 35 236 183 90 66 117 92 97 69 87 71 81 59 472 357 Auckland 28 25 24 22 17 13 16 16 14 10 99 86 Wellington 11 11 8 6 13 10 12 9 9 7 53 43 39 36 32 28 30 23 28 25 23 17 152 129 Oceania 129 102 149 120 127 92 115 96 104 76 624 486 Edmonton 46 34 58 45 32 25 30 23 20 11 186 138 North America 46 34 58 45 32 25 30 23 20 11 186 138 El Salvador San Salvador 5 5 10 7 36 32 37 29 73 67 161 140 Trinidad and Tobago Saint Augustine 0 0 1 1 1 0 8 6 21 19 31 26 Central America 5 5 11 8 37 32 45 35 94 86 192 166 A: applicants B: examinees Notes The number of examinees includes those who took only some of the test sections. 13

Countries and areas Argentina Chile Venezuela Peru Bolivia Cities N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 A B A B A B A B A B A B Buenos Aires 7 7 11 9 16 14 34 30 60 57 128 117 Santiago 3 3 8 7 14 11 20 17 28 23 73 61 Caracas 2 2 9 9 23 20 45 30 111 94 190 155 Lima 13 13 12 11 23 17 36 29 66 61 150 131 Santa Cruz 20 20 28 28 34 34 30 28 24 23 136 133 La Paz 2 2 6 5 13 12 27 22 48 44 96 85 22 22 34 33 47 46 57 50 72 67 232 218 South America 47 47 74 69 123 108 192 156 337 302 773 682 U K Netherlands Sweden Spain Germany Belgium London 110 88 144 122 112 90 126 106 178 150 670 556 Edinburgh 13 11 17 14 10 7 17 12 34 26 91 70 123 99 161 136 122 97 143 118 212 176 761 626 Leiden 22 19 43 36 35 30 56 50 51 44 207 179 Stockholm 23 18 42 34 12 11 12 10 16 13 105 86 Madrid 14 12 42 35 50 39 119 105 137 121 362 312 Granada 4 4 5 4 26 22 47 44 66 62 148 136 18 16 47 39 76 61 166 149 203 183 510 448 Dusseldorf 64 55 153 127 87 74 107 91 107 91 518 438 Hamburg 47 33 67 56 59 43 68 55 87 66 328 253 111 88 220 183 146 117 175 146 194 157 846 691 Leuven 7 5 23 22 18 14 13 11 26 26 87 78 Western Europe 304 245 536 450 409 330 565 484 702 599 2,516 2,108 Uzbekistan Kazakhstan Tashkent 22 19 85 69 97 76 186 131 291 203 681 498 Almaty 9 8 15 13 23 20 20 18 36 31 103 90 Bishkek 11 8 22 20 44 38 52 44 59 46 188 156 Kyrgyz Republic Hungary Belarus Poland Budapest 15 13 37 32 67 56 65 54 37 33 221 188 Minsk 3 3 11 10 37 34 56 50 74 67 181 164 Warsaw 49 40 132 113 116 94 143 120 178 157 618 524 Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 0 0 0 4 4 6 6 4 3 14 13 Russia Moscow 58 48 164 142 223 206 306 270 305 273 1,056 939 Vladivostok 26 24 37 25 58 46 74 63 108 93 303 251 84 72 201 167 281 252 380 333 413 366 1,359 1,190 Eastern Europe 193 163 503 424 669 574 908 756 1,092 906 3,365 2,823 Ankara 29 23 77 60 59 51 67 53 56 42 288 229 Turkey Istanbul 30 21 85 55 62 49 104 87 137 96 418 308 59 44 162 115 121 100 171 140 193 138 706 537 Middle East 59 44 162 115 121 100 171 140 193 138 706 537 40135 135 cities in 40 countries / areas 80,896 68,235 105,171 89,320 71,951 58,417 51,353 42,468 51,990 42,463 361,361 300,903 121,614 105,026 163,934 143,939 133,829 116,543 69,571 59,205 55,241 45,366 544,189 470,079 A: applicants B: examinees Notes The number of examinees includes those who took only some of the test sections. 14

3. 受験上の配慮 Special Testing Accommodations 障害のある受験者について 受験上の配慮を行いました Special testing accommodations were provided for people having documented disabilities. Case / / examinees Specific accommodations Visual disability Hearing disability Severe visual disability Low vision Exemption from listening section Hard of hearing 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 4 3 3 0 0 0 6 3 0 2 0 0 5 7 7 4 4 5 27 10 7 6 4 5 32 2 2 0 0 0 4 3 4 3 4 6 20 5 6 3 4 6 24 2 3 1 0 0 6 3 4 0 0 4 11 5 7 1 0 4 17 Test paper and answer sheets provided in braille Adjustment of the number of braille chracters per test hour Separate testing room Large print test paper Extended test time Answers written in test papers Use of magnifying glasses Separate testing room Listening section exempted Use of headphones and hearing aid Use of headphones and hearing aid Seat positioned in front of audio speakers Separate testing room Physical disability 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 9 4 4 4 25 4 9 4 4 5 26 Large print test paper Extended test time Answers written in test papers Separate testing room (LD/ADHD/ASD Developmental Disabilities (LD/ADHD/ASD/others) Others 3 1 1 0 0 5 Large print test paper 2 2 3 3 4 14 5 3 4 3 4 19 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 3 12 6 4 1 1 24 Extended test time Answers written in test papers Colored glasses Use of colored glasses Use of headphones Separate testing room Test paper and answer sheets provided in braille Adjustment of the number of braille chracters per test hour Listening section exempted Large print test paper Extended test time Answers written in test papers CCTV Use of magnifying glasses Use of hearing aid Presence of assistant Seat positioned in front of audio speakers Separate testing room 20 29 14 17 23 103 32 35 18 18 24 127 15

4. 平均点と標準偏差 Average Scores and Standard Deviations Scoring sections Language Knowledge Vocabulary/Grammar Reading Language Knowledge Vocabulary/Grammar & Reading Listening Score / / A: Average score B: Standard deviation N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 A B A B A B A B A B 27.9 10.7 24.2 10.2 27.0 7.8 - - - - 30.2 11.5 27.6 10.8 31.8 9.3 - - - - 29.4 11.3 26.3 10.7 29.4 8.9 - - - - 28.7 13.2 23.7 12.1 25.5 8.6 - - - - 28.7 13.7 28.6 13.4 31.3 11.0 - - - - 28.7 13.5 26.8 13.1 28.4 10.3 - - - - - - - - - - 51.1 14.8 56.9 20.7 - - - - - - 55.6 18.1 54.5 21.3 - - - - - - 54.3 17.4 54.7 21.2 35.2 10.4 35.3 10.8 33.6 9.3 30.9 7.8 33.7 9.8 31.1 12.0 33.7 12.4 33.3 11.8 28.1 9.2 28.0 9.9 32.5 11.7 34.3 11.8 33.5 10.6 28.9 9.0 28.3 10.0 91.8 28.9 83.2 27.3 86.1 21.4 82.0 20.5 90.6 28.1 90.0 31.9 90.0 30.4 96.4 27.4 83.7 25.4 82.5 29.0 90.6 30.9 87.4 29.4 91.2 25.1 83.2 24.1 83.0 29.0 5. 最高点と最低点 Highest and Lowest Scores Scoring sections Language Knowledge Vocabulary/Grammar Reading Language Knowledge Vocabulary/Grammar & Reading Listening Score / / N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 C D C D C D C D C D 0 60 0 60 0 60 - - - - 0 60 0 60 0 60 - - - - 0 60 0 60 0 60 - - - - 0 60 0 60 0 60 - - - - 0 60 0 60 0 60 - - - - 0 60 0 60 0 60 - - - - - - - - - - 0 120 0 120 - - - - - - 0 120 0 120 - - - - - - 0 120 0 120 0 60 0 60 0 60 0 60 0 60 0 60 0 60 0 60 0 60 0 60 0 60 0 60 0 60 0 60 0 60 0 180 0 180 0 180 0 180 0 180 0 180 0 180 0 180 0 180 0 180 0 180 0 180 0 180 0 180 0 180 C: Lowest score D: Highest score Notes The number of examinees refers to those who took all test sections. The number of examinees for each level are shown in the table below. N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 36,695 54,517 58,007 16,704 2,887 168,810 68,165 89,243 58,332 42,415 42,417 300,572 104,860 143,760 116,339 59,119 45,304 469,382 16

6. 尺度得点累積分布図 Cumulative Distribution of Scaled Scores 受験者を尺度得点の低い方から高い方へ昇順に並べることを考えます このとき 全受験者数に占める任意の得点未満の受験者の割合を求め これに 100 を掛けた値を パーセンタイル順位 と呼びます パーセンタイル順位を利用することで 受験者集団の中で自分がどの位置にいるかを客観的に把握することができます 例えば パーセンタイル順位が 20 であるならば 受験者集団の中で得点の低い方から数えて 20% の位置に 50 であるならば受験者集団のちょうど中心に 100 であるならば受験者集団のトップに それぞれ位置づけられると解釈します 下図は 尺度得点とパーセンタイル順位の対応関係を示しています ( 累積分布図と呼びます ) このグラフと合否結果通知書に記載されている尺度得点を利用することで 各試験における受験者のパーセンタイル順位を概算することができます また 尺度得点はいつの試験を受験しても同じ能力であれば同じ得点になるので このグラフを使って 違う回の試験の得点の分布を比較することが可能です これにより 各回の試験の受験者集団の傾向について詳細な考察が可能になります 2016 年第 1 回 (7 月 ) 分より 日本語能力試験結果の概要 に掲載する尺度得点累積分布図については 海外で受験した合格者 ( 聴解免除を除く ) の成績証明書に表示されるパーセンタイル順位に即し 今回の試験を含む過去 6 回分のデータを利用します Consider the case in which examinees are sorted in ascending order of scaled scores. Then, the percentage of examinees with a score below any point out of the total number of examinees is calculated, and the value obtained by multiplying the percentage by 100 is called percentile rank. The percentile rank allows an individual to objectively understand his or her position among a group of examinees. For example, from a percentile rank of 20, an individual can infer that his or her position is 20% above the lowest score among a group of examinees. With a percentile rank of 50, he or she is in the middle of the group, while 100 indicates being at the top of the group. The chart below (called a cumulative distribution map ) shows the correspondence between scaled scores and percentile ranks. By using this chart and scaled scores given in the Score Report, the percentile rank of examinees in each test can be estimated. In addition, because scaled scores for the same proficiency are the same regardless of when the test is taken, distributions of scores from different test times can be compared using this chart. This enables detailed analysis of tendencies of examinee groups at each testing occasion. Starting with the July 2016 issue of the JLPT Summary of the Results, the cumulative distribution of scaled scores uses the data of the six latest tests including this test, in line with the percentile rank indicated on the certificate of examinees who passed the test overseas (excluding those who were exempt from the Listening section). グラフの見方 右のグラフでは 例えば90 点をとった受験者のパーセンタイル順位は60です これは その人の下に全受験者の60% がいるということを表しています 尺度得点累積分布図 (N1) Cumulative Distribution of Scaled Scores(N1) Interpreting the chart The right chart shows, for example, the percentile rank of an examinee with 90 points is 60. This means that 60% of all examinees are under him/her. 17

パーセンタイル順位 Percentile rank 尺度得点累積分布図 (N1) Cumulative Distribution of Scaled Scores(N1) 100.0 90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 国内受験者 Examinees in 海外受験者 Examinees overseas 全体 10.0 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 尺度得点 Scaled scores 尺度得点 パーセンタイル順位 Percentile rank Scaled scores 国内 海外 180 99.4 99.2 99.3 175 99.0 98.8 98.9 170 98.6 98.2 98.3 165 97.9 97.4 97.6 160 97.3 96.6 96.9 155 96.5 95.8 96.0 150 95.7 94.8 95.1 145 94.6 93.6 93.9 140 93.3 92.3 92.6 135 91.8 90.7 91.1 130 90.0 88.9 89.3 125 87.7 86.7 87.0 120 85.0 84.1 84.4 115 81.6 81.0 81.2 110 77.5 77.3 77.4 105 72.6 73.1 72.9 100 66.8 68.1 67.7 95 60.2 62.5 61.7 90 53.0 56.2 55.2 85 45.5 49.6 48.2 80 38.0 42.6 41.0 75 30.4 35.6 33.9 70 23.5 28.9 27.1 65 17.4 22.7 20.9 60 12.3 17.1 15.5 55 8.3 12.5 11.1 50 5.2 8.7 7.5 45 3.2 5.9 5.0 40 1.8 3.9 3.2 35 0.9 2.4 1.9 30 0.4 1.3 1.0 25 0.2 0.5 0.4 20 0.1 0.2 0.1 15 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Note The chart shows curves fitted to an actual cumulative distribution of scaled scores. 18

パーセンタイル順位 Percentile rank 尺度得点累積分布図 (N2) Cumulative Distribution of Scaled Scores(N2) 100.0 90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 国内受験者 Examinees in 海外受験者 Examinees overseas 全体 10.0 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 尺度得点 Scaled scores Note Scaled scores Percentile rank 180 99.9 99.6 99.7 175 99.7 99.2 99.4 170 99.5 98.7 99.0 165 99.3 98.0 98.5 160 98.9 97.2 97.8 155 98.4 96.3 97.1 150 97.9 95.2 96.2 145 97.2 93.9 95.2 140 96.4 92.5 94.0 135 95.4 90.9 92.6 130 94.2 89.0 90.9 125 92.7 86.8 89.0 120 90.9 84.2 86.7 115 88.5 81.2 83.9 110 85.6 77.6 80.6 105 81.9 73.3 76.5 100 77.3 68.3 71.6 95 71.7 62.5 65.9 90 65.1 55.9 59.3 85 57.5 48.6 51.9 80 49.2 40.7 43.8 75 40.5 32.7 35.6 70 32.1 25.0 27.6 65 24.2 18.1 20.4 60 17.3 12.3 14.2 55 11.6 7.9 9.2 50 7.2 4.7 5.6 45 4.2 2.6 3.2 40 2.2 1.3 1.6 35 1.0 0.5 0.7 30 0.4 0.2 0.3 25 0.2 0.1 0.1 20 0.1 0.0 0.0 15 0.1 0.0 0.0 10 0.1 0.0 0.0 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 The chart shows curves fitted to an actual cumulative distribution of scaled scores. 19

パーセンタイル順位 Percentile rank 尺度得点累積分布図 (N3) Cumulative Distribution of Scaled Scores(N3) 100.0 90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 国内受験者 Examinees in 海外受験者 Examinees overseas 全体 10.0 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 尺度得点 Scaled scores Note Scaled scores Percentile rank 180 99.9 99.5 99.7 175 99.9 99.1 99.5 170 99.8 98.5 99.0 165 99.6 97.7 98.5 160 99.3 96.7 97.8 155 99.0 95.6 97.1 150 98.7 94.4 96.3 145 98.2 93.0 95.3 140 97.6 91.3 94.1 135 96.8 89.4 92.7 130 95.8 87.3 91.1 125 94.4 84.7 89.0 120 92.6 81.7 86.5 115 90.1 78.1 83.4 110 86.7 73.7 79.5 105 82.2 68.5 74.6 100 76.3 62.3 68.5 95 68.9 55.0 61.2 90 60.1 46.7 52.7 85 50.2 38.0 43.4 80 39.7 29.1 33.8 75 29.2 20.9 24.6 70 19.9 13.8 16.5 65 12.3 8.3 10.0 60 6.8 4.4 5.5 55 3.4 2.1 2.7 50 1.6 0.9 1.2 45 0.7 0.4 0.5 40 0.3 0.1 0.2 35 0.2 0.0 0.1 30 0.1 0.0 0.1 25 0.1 0.0 0.0 20 0.1 0.0 0.0 15 0.1 0.0 0.0 10 0.1 0.0 0.0 5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 The chart shows curves fitted to an actual cumulative distribution of scaled scores. 20

パーセンタイル順位 Percentile rank 尺度得点累積分布図 (N4) Cumulative Distribution of Scaled Scores(N4) 100.0 90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 国内受験者 Examinees in 海外受験者 Examinees overseas 全体 10.0 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 尺度得点 Scaled scores Note Scaled scores Percentile rank 180 99.9 99.7 99.8 175 99.8 99.5 99.6 170 99.7 99.3 99.4 165 99.6 99.0 99.1 160 99.5 98.6 98.8 155 99.3 98.1 98.4 150 99.0 97.5 97.9 145 98.7 96.7 97.2 140 98.3 95.9 96.5 135 97.7 94.8 95.6 130 96.9 93.5 94.4 125 95.9 91.9 92.9 120 94.5 89.9 91.1 115 92.6 87.4 88.7 110 90.0 84.3 85.8 105 86.7 80.5 82.1 100 82.3 75.7 77.4 95 76.3 70.0 71.7 90 68.9 63.3 64.8 85 60.2 55.6 56.8 80 50.3 47.0 47.9 75 40.1 38.4 38.8 70 30.1 29.8 29.9 65 21.0 21.9 21.7 60 13.3 15.0 14.6 55 7.6 9.4 8.9 50 3.8 5.1 4.8 45 1.6 2.3 2.1 40 0.7 0.8 0.8 35 0.3 0.2 0.3 30 0.2 0.1 0.1 25 0.1 0.0 0.1 20 0.1 0.0 0.0 15 0.1 0.0 0.0 10 0.1 0.0 0.0 5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 The chart shows curves fitted to an actual cumulative distribution of scaled scores. 21

パーセンタイル順位 Percentile rank 尺度得点累積分布図 (N5) Cumulative Distribution of Scaled Scores(N5) 100.0 90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 国内受験者 Examinees in 海外受験者 Examinees overseas 全体 10.0 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 尺度得点 Scaled scores Note Scaled scores Percentile rank 180 99.6 99.7 99.7 175 99.5 99.6 99.6 170 99.3 99.4 99.4 165 99.0 99.1 99.1 160 98.5 98.7 98.7 155 97.9 98.2 98.2 150 97.2 97.6 97.6 145 96.3 96.9 96.9 140 95.0 96.0 96.0 135 93.5 95.0 94.9 130 91.5 93.6 93.5 125 89.0 92.0 91.8 120 86.2 89.9 89.7 115 82.7 87.4 87.1 110 78.2 84.2 83.9 105 73.1 80.5 80.0 100 67.3 76.0 75.5 95 60.5 70.7 70.1 90 52.9 64.6 63.9 85 45.0 57.7 56.9 80 36.8 50.3 49.5 75 29.1 42.6 41.8 70 21.8 34.9 34.1 65 15.3 27.6 26.8 60 10.2 20.7 20.1 55 6.4 14.6 14.1 50 3.7 9.1 8.8 45 1.8 4.7 4.5 40 0.9 1.8 1.8 35 0.4 0.6 0.6 30 0.3 0.2 0.2 25 0.2 0.1 0.1 20 0.1 0.0 0.0 15 0.1 0.0 0.0 10 0.1 0.0 0.0 5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 The chart shows curves fitted to an actual cumulative distribution of scaled scores. 22

Ⅲ 2009 年までの実施状況 Statistics for the Tests through 2009 23

Ⅳ 2010 年からの実施状況 Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Statistics for the Tests from 2010 July/December 1 July 2 December 1 July 2 December 1 July 2 December 1 July 2 December 1 July 2 December 1 July 2 December 1 July 2 December / / examinees by test level countries and areas cities applicants examinees N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 1 33 57,910 53,101 23,695 23,126 6,280 - - 13 80 203,979 169,912 62,938 74,874 32,100 - - 14 113 261,889 223,013 86,633 98,000 38,380 - - 1 35 86,180 79,682 36,810 26,020 7,665 7,317 1,870 57 186 355,616 305,277 87,763 91,996 45,906 41,484 38,128 58 221 441,796 384,959 124,573 118,016 53,571 48,801 39,998 1 35 144,090 132,783 60,505 49,146 13,945 7,317 1,870 57 186 559,595 475,189 150,701 166,870 78,006 41,484 38,128 58 221 703,685 607,972 211,206 216,016 91,951 48,801 39,998 1 34 53,920 49,957 22,782 17,957 5,211 3,358 649 20 96 249,956 212,177 76,991 79,716 29,507 15,453 10,510 21 130 303,876 262,134 99,773 97,673 34,718 18,811 11,159 1 40 76,061 70,413 33,460 21,296 7,580 6,596 1,481 60 196 317,461 275,610 88,450 82,944 41,655 33,402 29,159 61 236 393,522 346,023 121,910 104,240 49,235 39,998 30,640 1 40 129,981 120,370 56,242 39,253 12,791 9,954 2,130 61 198 567,417 487,787 165,441 162,660 71,162 48,855 39,669 62 238 697,398 608,157 221,683 201,913 83,953 58,809 41,799 1 39 59,850 55,904 24,142 18,843 6,878 5,116 925 22 103 234,899 202,943 69,082 69,418 31,942 18,590 13,911 23 142 294,749 258,847 93,224 88,261 38,820 23,706 14,836 1 42 72,518 67,199 30,296 19,612 9,422 6,562 1,307 61 201 283,795 246,123 75,250 69,790 39,763 31,620 29,700 62 243 356,313 313,322 105,546 89,402 49,185 38,182 31,007 1 42 132,368 123,103 54,438 38,455 16,300 11,678 2,232 63 205 518,694 449,066 144,332 139,208 71,705 50,210 43,611 64 247 651,062 572,169 198,770 177,663 88,005 61,888 45,843 1 42 64,680 60,368 25,117 19,712 9,337 5,297 905 21 101 230,739 198,962 65,225 64,885 32,895 19,941 16,016 22 143 295,419 259,330 90,342 84,597 42,232 25,238 16,921 1 44 75,468 69,463 28,929 21,211 11,501 6,430 1,392 63 202 279,995 242,282 71,490 64,989 41,129 32,752 31,922 64 246 355,463 311,745 100,419 86,200 52,630 39,182 33,314 1 44 140,148 129,831 54,046 40,923 20,838 11,727 2,297 64 206 510,734 441,244 136,715 129,874 74,024 52,693 47,938 65 250 650,882 571,075 190,761 170,797 94,862 64,420 50,235 1 45 71,306 66,382 24,395 20,855 13,749 6,208 1,175 23 105 240,782 206,961 64,409 64,699 35,251 22,944 19,658 24 150 312,088 273,343 88,804 85,554 49,000 29,152 20,833 1 45 86,186 78,836 27,309 25,548 16,767 7,516 1,696 65 208 283,619 242,503 66,610 63,494 42,642 34,265 35,492 66 253 369,805 321,339 93,919 89,042 59,409 41,781 37,188 1 45 157,492 145,218 51,704 46,403 30,516 13,724 2,871 66 213 524,401 449,464 131,019 128,193 77,893 57,209 55,150 67 258 681,893 594,682 182,723 174,596 108,409 70,933 58,021 1 45 90,065 83,592 24,971 26,788 20,867 9,332 1,634 28 115 253,981 215,705 60,642 64,764 38,489 27,241 24,569 29 160 344,046 299,297 85,613 91,552 59,356 36,573 26,203 1 45 109,676 100,477 29,305 33,374 24,683 10,969 2,146 65 209 296,530 252,745 64,355 65,804 45,589 38,566 38,431 66 254 406,206 353,222 93,660 99,178 70,272 49,535 40,577 1 45 199,741 184,069 54,276 60,162 45,550 20,301 3,780 68 219 550,511 468,450 124,997 130,568 84,078 65,807 63,000 69 264 750,252 652,519 179,273 190,730 129,628 86,108 66,780 1 45 121,539 113,227 27,810 36,525 34,368 12,547 1,977 31 119 268,135 227,852 59,790 68,642 41,816 30,498 27,106 32 164 389,674 341,079 87,600 105,167 76,184 43,045 29,083 1 45 145,201 132,911 34,065 45,687 36,536 13,937 2,686 69 217 331,419 281,812 64,866 74,949 52,404 44,393 45,200 70 262 476,620 414,723 98,931 120,636 88,940 58,330 47,886 1 45 266,740 246,138 61,875 82,212 70,904 26,484 4,663 73 228 599,554 509,664 124,656 143,591 94,220 74,891 72,306 74 273 866,294 755,802 186,531 225,803 165,124 101,375 76,969 24

合計2012 年 2013 年 第2回第2回合計第1回第2回合計1回第1計2015 年 2016 年 1回 Year 2017 2018 July/December 1 July 2 December 1 July / / countries and areas cities applicants examinees examinees by test level N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 1 47 152,267 141,176 31,677 47,316 44,847 14,809 2,527 35 127 314,140 262,930 63,021 80,933 50,635 36,193 32,148 36 174 466,407 404,106 94,698 128,249 95,482 51,002 34,675 1 47 181,203 165,500 39,616 57,374 48,471 16,759 3,280 76 226 379,501 317,774 69,322 86,145 60,855 51,643 49,809 77 273 560,704 483,274 108,938 143,519 109,326 68,402 53,089 1 47 333,470 306,676 71,293 104,690 93,318 31,568 5,807 80 239 693,641 580,704 132,343 167,078 111,490 87,836 81,957 81 286 1,027,111 887,380 203,636 271,768 204,808 119,404 87,764 1 46 182,828 169,176 36,791 54,619 58,126 16,737 2,903 40 135 361,361 300,903 68,235 89,320 58,417 42,468 42,463 41 181 544,189 470,079 105,026 143,939 116,543 59,205 45,366 人 Persons 海外受験者数 examinees overseas 国内受験者数 examinees in 実施都市数 cities where the JLPT was administered 都市 Cities 950,000 900,000 850,000 800,000 750,000 700,000 650,000 600,000 550,000 500,000 450,000 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 第第2回合計第1回第2回合計第1回第2回合計第1回第2回1回2010 年 2011 年第合計2014 年第1回第合第2回回2017 年 2018 年 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 年 Year Notes 2010 17 N1 N3 For July test in 2010, N1,N2 and N3 tests were offered. 25