1,a) 1 1,2 Sakriani Sakti 1 1 1 1. [1][2] [3][4] [5][6][7] [8] [9] 1 Nara Institute of Science and Technology 2 Japan Science and Technology Agency a) ishikawa.yoko.io5@is.naist.jp 2. 1 Belief-Desire theory of emotion (BDTE)[10] BDTE (Desire) (Belief) 1
BD 1 u t b t e t s t SVR 2.2 Russell [13] Russell valence arousal 2 1 valence arousal 0 Russell BDTE b t e t 1 3 2.3 2.1 2.2 u t s t 2 2.1 5 5: 3: 1: SVR (Support Vector Regression) SVR SVM (Support Vector Machine) SVR 3 2 2-1 q i r i q i u t cos 2 2.1 SVR 2
2-2 u t q i b t b i 1 e t e i 3. [15] [16] 3.1 20 200 1000 1 1 200 200 200 200 200 2282 2173 2147 2175 2203 2292 2185 2180 2155 2216 3 3 2 5 5 2 3 2 3 NO 3 2 20% 30% 20% 2 1 2964 26.36% 4 1155 10.27% 2 2967 26.39% 5 1100 9.78% 3 1935 17.21% NO 1123 9.99% 3 6502 29.53% 5491 24.94% 1940 8.81% 818 3.72% 4978 22.61% NO 2286 10.38% Fleiss Kappa[14] Fleiss Kappa 0.4 0.4 4 4 22008 10980 Fleiss Kappa 0.41 0.37 0.85 1 4. 4.1 3 NEUTRAL (NEUTRAL) RANDOM 3
PROPOSAL 3 2 1 3 5 5: 3: 1: 102 33 69 20 23 30 36 40 32 50 11 4.2 5 6 5 NEU 88 14 86.28% RAN 90 12 88.24% PRO 91 11 89.22% 6 NEU 11.47 9.96 RAN 10.82 9.47 PRO 10.84 9.62 PROPOSAL NEUTRAL RANDOM, PROPOSAL 3 7 NEUTRAL PROPOSAL 7 (5) (4) PROPOSAL PROPOSAL (3) PROPOSAL 3 7 NEU RAN PRO 1,2 41.18% 52.94% 48.04% 3 22.55% 22.55% 12.75% 4,5 36.27% 24.51% 39.22% NEU RAN PRO 1,2 23.53% 48.04% 38.24% 3 31.37% 24.51% 25.49% 4,5 45.10% 27.45% 36.27% NEUTRAL 4.3 PROPOSAL 8 (4) (5) 9 / (2) 8 S4,S5 U4 4 9 U5-S6 4
8 PROPOSAL 1 S1 U1 2.92 S2 U2 1.78 S3 U3 2.72 S4! U4 3.60 S5 U5 4.08 S6 9 PROPOSAL 2 S1 U1 1.32 S2 U2 2.23 S3 U3 2.25 S4 U4 3.88 S5 U5 3.30 S6 U6 1.86 S7 U7 S8 2.11 U8 2.86 S9 U9 4.54 S10 S4, S5, S6 10 PROPOSAL 10 / (1) 10 PROPOSAL S1 U1 0.98 S2 U2 0.95 S3 U3 1.71 S4 U4 0.76 S5 U5 1.46 S6 U6 0.78 S7 S3 U3 S4 5. 5
[13] Russell, J. A. A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, pp. 1161 1178, 1980. [14] Fleiss, J. L. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1981. [15] Howe, J. The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine, 14, pp. 1 4, 2006. [16],,, Sakti Sakriani,.. 7, 78, pp. 141-143, 2015. [1] Ekman, P. Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist, 48, pp. 384 392, 1993. [2] Clark, M. S., and Reis, H. T. Interpersonal processes in close relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, pp. 609 672, 1983. [3] Keltner, D., and Haidtm J. Social functions of emotions at multiple levels of analysis. Cognition & Emotion, 13, pp. 505 522, 1999. [4] Morris, M. W., and Keltner, D. How emotions work: An analysis of the social functions of emotional expression in negotiations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, pp. 1 50, 2000. [5] Forgas, J. P. On feeling good and getting your way: Mood effects on negotiator cognition and bargaining strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, pp. 565 577, 1998. [6] Carnevale, P. J., and Isen, A. The influence of positive affect and visual access on the discovery of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37, pp. 1 13, 1986. [7] Sinaceur, M., and Tiedens, L. Z. Get mad and get more than even: When and why anger expression is effective in negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, pp. 314 322, 2006. [8],,.., 29, pp. 1-4, 2015. [9] Mazzotta, I., de Rosis, F., and Carofiglio, V. Portia: A user-adapted persuasion system in the healthy-eating domain. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22, pp. 42 51, 2007. [10] Reisenzein, R. Emotions as metarepresentational states of mind: Naturalizing the beliefdesire theory of emotion. Cognitive Systems Research, 10, pp. 6 20, 2009. [11] Taku Kudo, Kaoru Yamamoto, and Yuji Matsumoto. Applying Conditional Random Fields to Japanese Morphological Analysis. In Processing of the Conference on Empitical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 230 237, 2004. [12] Hiroya Takamura, Takashi Inui, and Manabu Okumura. Extracting semantic orientations of words using spin model. in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, 43, pp. 133 140, 2005. 6