研 究 論 文 : 雑 誌 Myojo における ジャニーズ イメージの 受 容 53 Myojo 1 Myojo 2012 10 60 / 1 Myojo 1952 27 1992 10 Myojo /Myojo 2 2002, 2003, 2008 1987 1950 1970 2002 2002 10 /Myojo /Myojo 50 /Myojo 10 1990 90 2000 2002 10 90 Myojo 3
54 2002 11 2012 10 Myojo Myojo 4 Myojo 5 Myojo men s studies, 1989, p. 49 2 2.1 /Myojo 1950 1970 1980 2000 Myojo /Myojo
研 究 論 文 : 雑 誌 Myojo における ジャニーズ イメージの 受 容 55 100 70 Myojo 6 7 / Myojo 80 8 9 Myojo 90 6 4 10 11 2000 2000 2002 10 Myojo
56 2.2 1970 masculinity studies 1990 1993, 1996, 1996, p. 130 p. 149 2001 2009 p. 30 E 1985=2001 18-19 /
研 究 論 文 : 雑 誌 Myojo における ジャニーズ イメージの 受 容 57 p. 35 2003, 2006 Myojo 2.3 / / 1989 1993 2000 2000 p. 122
58 Myojo Myojo 2.4 1989 1991 1993 1960 1962 1975 1980 40 10 2004 2007 2010 2010 12
59 Myojo 3 Myojo 3.1 Myojo Myojo 2002 11 2012 10 3.1.1 Myojo 2002 11 2012 10 Myojo Table1 13 Table1 Myojo 2002 11 2012 10 Figure1 2011 12 72 69 3 96% 100%
60 2002 Myojo 2 Figure1 7 Myojo /Myojo Myojo 3.1.2 Myojo CONTENTS
61 2 2002.11 2003.10 40.80% 2003.11 2004.10 36.50% 2004.11 2005.10 41.30% 2005.11 2006.10 44.20% 2006.11 2007.10 41.10% 2007.11 2008.10 41.70% 2008.11 2009.10 39.60% 2009.11 2010.10 50.20% 2010.11 2011.10 52.60% 2011.11 2012.10 48.80% 43.60% Table2 14 10 48.8% 2010 15 Figure2 2006 1 Figure2 2006 1 58 27
62 Myojo 22 10 9 Myojo 3.2 Myojo 1
研 究 論 文 : 雑 誌 Myojo における ジャニーズ イメージの 受 容 63 3.2.1 Myojo 16 2005 2 p. 155 2003 5 pp. 163-165 1 3 4 4 & LOVE KISS SOS
64 & 2007 3 2007 3 NEWS p. 166 2 3 2010 110
65 Figure3 2011 3 p.130 Figure4 2011 12 p.144 Figure3 Figure4 2010 Myojo 2011 5 NYC, Kis-My-Ft2, SexyZone STREET
66 3.2.2 Jr. Figure5 2008 1 pp.50-51 Figure5 TALK 3 NEWS 1
67 Hey! Say! JUMP, SexyZone 2010 Figure6 2012 6 p.29 Figure6 SexyZone SexyZone
68 Figure7 2011 4 p.37 Figure7 JUMP JUMP 1 JUMP
研 究 論 文 : 雑 誌 Myojo における ジャニーズ イメージの 受 容 69 KAT-TUN 2005 2 7V.S.BEST 2009 5 Hey! Say! JUMP 7VSBEST! 2010 9 17 1990 18 Myojo 2003 1 4 4.1 Myojo
70 Myojo 10 10 /Myojo Myojo
研 究 論 文 : 雑 誌 Myojo における ジャニーズ イメージの 受 容 71 Myojo 9 3 Myojo 19 Myojo 4.2 Myojo 10, 1989 40 10
72 Myojo Myojo Myojo Myojo 10 Myojo 2010
研 究 論 文 : 雑 誌 Myojo における ジャニーズ イメージの 受 容 73 Myojo Myojo Myojo, 2006, p. 39
74 4.3 Myojo Myojo 2012 Myojo Figure8 2012 6 Figure8 Kis-My-Ft2 BODY Kis-My-Ft2 Figure9 2010 8 p.110
研 究 論 文 : 雑 誌 Myojo における ジャニーズ イメージの 受 容 75 20 21 2010 AKB48 2010 5 KARA 2010 11 K-POP GIRLS Myojo 5 Myojo Myojo
76 Myojo Myojo Myojo
研 究 論 文 : 雑 誌 Myojo における ジャニーズ イメージの 受 容 77 Footnotes 1 1970 1970 / 2 1992 Myojo /Myojo 3 /Myojo 4 2011 11 11 Myojo 5 1952 9 p. 6 6 2011 2010 1 919 3140 3.1% 5 2008 4.1% 2010 20 7104 5.0% 7 2007 KAT-TUN pp.185-186 8 Momoco 1983 Dunk 1984 POTATO 1984 duet 1986 Wink up 1988 9 2012 Myojo 24 Wink up 25 duet 16 POTATO 15 10 /Myojo 11 2012 JUNON Wink up duet POTATO BOMB Myojo 2007 Myojo /
78 12 13 1 1 1 14 M 1 15 2010 8 2010 11 16 After school 2003 1 2004 12 2005 1 2006 12 2007 1 2009 1 DX 2009 2 2010 10 2010 11 17 SMAP S Sports S 18 2004 2009 2011 19 20 50 20 an an 1990 SEX 2012 6 20 21 2010 4 25 2010
研 究 論 文 : 雑 誌 Myojo における ジャニーズ イメージの 受 容 79 References (2003) 20, 204-217. (2006) 27, 71-85. (2000) (Eds.)., 113-127. (1993) (1996) (2009) 12, 1-30. (1989) (1989) (1982) (1990) (2009) 6, 1-46. (2010) (2012) 1 1, 50-160. (1989) (2009) & & (Eds.), 20-45. (1988) (1991) & (Eds.), 90-106.
80 (1989) (2005) (2000) 53, 255-264. (2002) 60, 122-136. (2003) 42 33, 107-147. (2008) 1950 (2001) < > (2006) (2004) & (Eds.) 21, 2-52. (2010) 5, 21-46. (2002) 50 601 (2010) 78, 165-179. (2007) (1993) (2010) Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. (2001). ( &, Trans.) (Original work pblished 1985). Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
研 究 論 文 : 雑 誌 Myojo における ジャニーズ イメージの 受 容 81 The Image and Reception of Johnny s in the magazine Myojo Yuki TAJIMA Using men s studies, this paper will examine the images and reception of Johnny s in Myojo magazine (Shuueisha). At the same time, it will deepen the understanding of its conception through interviews with the editor. Magazines from November 2002 October 2012, including the front cover, reader s page and colored photographs, will be analyzed. The research focuses on finding a connection between Johnny s and the readers, and how the relationships between Johnny s stars are depicted. Especially regarding the latter point, this essay argues that there is a connection to the theories of Eve Sedgewick on homosocial, homophobia, and misogyny (1985-2001). The above leads to the conclusion that, in Myojo, Johnny s are represented as the readers love interests, so the magazine functions as the site of a pseudo-romance between the readers and the entertainers. In addition, it seems clear that this is the editor s purpose. In the magazine, while excluding women and emphasizing the bond between Johnny s members, homosociality is highlighted, and further, associated with homosexuality in both discourse and symbolism. Conversely, Johnny s express their manliness through their rivalries and their high level of athletic ability, which constitutes an opposing image to that of homosexuality. In conclusion, although the magazine depicts homosocial relationships between Johnny s members without homophobia, there is no connection to Sedgewick s theories because these relationships are created by a female perspective, are about a heterosexual love imagined by the editors, and occur in the limited space of readers will outgrow the material sooner or later. Keywords: Magazines, Men s Studies, Johnny s, Male Image, Homosociality