10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45
1 1 2 2 3 4 5 61 7 8 3 9 10 11 4 12 1 13 14 5 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 6 23 24 25 26 7 27 28 8 29 30 31 32 33 9 34 35 10 36 37 38 11 39 40 41 12 42 43 44 45 46 30 13 47 48
14 49 50 51 52 15 53 54 55 56 16 57 58 59 17 60 61 18 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 19 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 ATS 83 84 85 20 86 87 21 88 22 89 90 91 92 23 93 94 95 96 24 97 98 99 100 101 102 25 103 104 105 106 26 107 108 109 110 111 27 112 113
13 14 13 1 21 21 How For What 1
13 2
1 9 12 3
12 7 4
NPM NPM 5
NPM 6
MBO: Management by Objectives 7
State of Iowa (1998) Budgeting for Results Handbook. SMART Specific Measurable Ambitious Realistic/Relevant Timed Performance Measurement 8
1960 DC Joseph S. Wholey Harry P. Hatry 1980 1992 Reinventing Government 1994 GPRA 4 (2001) 1(2). William R. Shadish, Thomas D. Cook and Laura C. Leviton (1991) Foundations of Program Evaluation: Theories and Practice, Sage Publication. 9
GPRA GPRAGovernment Performance & Results Act of 1993 3 Strategic Plan Mission Strategic Goals Performance Plan Performance Goals Performance Measures DOT 5 2 1 61 92 DOT Strategic Plan http://stratplan.dot.gov/ DOT Performance Plan/Report http://www.dot.gov/performance/ USAID Direct Agreed Practical Reliable Objective Useful ASPA (2000) (2001) 10
Policy Analysis Policy Assessment Regulatory Impact Assessment 2001 Regulatory Reform Act of 2001 200 Compliance Cost Consultation 100 DTLR DTLR http://www.dtlr.gov.uk/pubs/ria/ 11
Program Evaluation GAO GAO TBS 2000 3 Results for Canadians 4 2001 8 RMAFResults-based Management and Accountability Frameworks RMAF RMAF 2 Relevance= Success= Cost-Effectiveness= Transport Canada 5 56 TBS http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/eval/ 12
GAO GAO with/without U.S. GAO (1998) Performance Measurement and Evaluation: Definitions and Relationships, GAO/GGD-98-26 13
9 12 10 10 14
15 PI ( ) ( )
16 13 1 21 14 14 18
8 5 17
13 ODA Policy Issue 18
19 27 27 113 27 H1292.6% H18100% H124% H1870% H747% H17100%
20
1 1 1 2 2 3 2 4 2,000 5 3 6 7 4 8 3 9 5 10 6 11 7 4 12 8 13 14 9 5 15 10 16 11 17 12 18 13 19 14 20 15 21 16 22 17 6 23 18 24 25 19 26 20 7 27 21 28 8 29 22 30 31 23 21
32 33 9 34 24 35 25 10 36 26 37 27 38 28 11 39 29 40 30 41 31 12 42 32 43 33 44 34 45 35 46 36 30 13 47 37 48 38 14 49 39 50 40 51 52 41 15 53 42 54 43 55 44 56 45 16 57 46 58 47 59 48 22
17 60 49 61 50 18 62 51 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 52 71 72 53 73 54 74 75 19 76 55 77 78 56 79 57 80 58 81 59 82 ATS 83 60 84 61 85 62 20 86 63 87 64 21 88 65 22 89 66 90 91 67 92 68 23
23 93 69 94 70 95 71 96 72 24 97 73 98 99 100 101 102 25 103 74 104 75 105 76 106 77 26 IT 107 EDI 78 108 IT 109 IT 110 ETC 79 ITS 111 80 27 112 113 81 24
17 29 25
7 5 10 5 5 13 13 11 28 5 3 26
27
11 5 13 1 13 1 13 6 14 4 28
29 10 10 5 10 5
NPM NPM 13 27 113 30
10 PI Family of Measures 10 strategy mission vision 2002 GPRA strategic objectives corporate management strategy 31
Porter 2002 2001. Michael E. Porter (2002) What is Strategy? Harvard Business Review OnPoint Article. (Charan & Colvin 1999) 2001 TQMTotal Quality Management TQM (Government Executive) TQM 32
Ram Charan and Geoffrey Colvin (1999), Why CEOs fail Fortune June 21. (2001) Government Executive, Fdederal Performance Report Card, www.govexec.com. 11 GPRA (The President s Management Agenda) GPRA Performance Budgeting 10 OMB 33
2 26 NSF 19 110 12 Office of Management and Budget, U.S. Budget FY2003. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2003/budget.html 14 GPRA 10 34
12 12 BSC Balanced Scorecard Robert Kaplan David Norton 1996 Strategy-Focused Organization JP GE 500 35
cascading KPI MBO Organization & Change Framework Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton (2002) Strategy-Focused Organization, HBS Publishing 36
13 37
13 1 2 3 4 5 (1) 400 400 (2) http://www2.pref.shizuoka.jp/all/gyotana.nsf/ 38
14 Participatory Evaluation ODA 14 5,000 11 27 66 NPO 39
66 http://www.pref.aomori.jp/koutyou/marketing/index.html 40
41 2001 2001
42
13 13 10 14 11 13 13 8 14 38 8 14 6 8 45 13 13 8 43
44
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 45
13 15 19 GAP
GAP
()
15 16 17 18 19 20
50 15 53 15 15 100 17 16 1,500ha 1317 17 9.5 / 14 18 66 14 19 60 14 20 40 18 1400 GAP
13 13 12 13 12 14 21 14 14
2,000 CO2 CO2 22 91) 60% 17 1997 2010 1990 6% 13 7 / 860 kl 17 60% 30% ( GAP) ( ) 17 60% ( )
2,000 COP7 14 CO2 1/4 1990 23% CO2 90% 10
7
) ) ) 18 ) 17
19 23 7500 19.9 10 26.3 11 26.9 12 33.8 13 49.5 722 772 10 854 11 1,266 12 1,384 GAP
1 ha
( ) 25) 105)
12 42
20 11
11 11
VFM 13 13 14 PFI VFM
13 20 14 14 30
2
13 13 13 14 14 14 13 12 13 12 13 12 14 13 12 21 14 14 14 100 14 14 14 31 14
1 14 2,
13 14 14 2,791 14
13 14 80 14 5,588 14
100 ha 21 10 H13.7.10 14 H13.6.26 14 14 5,588
500m 3 300m 3,000m 3 1,000m 3 13 14 11 12 14 5,588
13 14 21 950 3,500
( ) 13 14 20 60 ( ) 14 5,588 14 14
13 14 14 305 323
()
14 3 13 8 13 8 13 8 2010 4 1 65 14 154 10
13 13 14 20 14,550 13 10
(1) 14 (2) 13 (3) 13 14 14 667
2,000 14 3 13 8 13 8 13 8 13 7 13 11 COP7 14 154 14 6 61,857 2,900 2,900 17 ( 2 )
14
13 16 11 11
1
( )
14 1.2.4 2 24 14 14 4 14 14 14 7 14 125
.2.(2)2.
13 10 11 11 13 10 13 11
13 13 13 5 5 18 6 121 500 112 5 27 14 3 13 5 18 6 121 500 114
115 30 ATS 10 B/C 27 113
SMART 116
13 13 13 13 5 13 29 29 13 11 13 17 13 14 14 15 15 17 117
13 11 14 6 13 6 28 118
119
120
13 6 25 121
13 14 1,108 789 21 767 3 11 13 56 1 13 122
1,108 162
789 21 767 3 197
13 9 198
IT ALOS PRISM VLBI GPS GIS 199
1 13 5 7 13 2 13 8 22 3 14 3 14 200
13 789 200 13 NPM 1993 GPRA GPRA GPRA 14 3 DOT HUD GAO GPRA 10 201
7 13 13 9 28 13 11 15 14 1 15 14 3 11 NPM NPM NPM 202
14 1 Q&A 13 5 18 13 9 3 3 20 NPO WAAV NPM 203
6 13 12 13 20 NPM 13 4 19 204