vballOlympicPredictionLondon01.dvi

Similar documents
vballOlympicPredictionLondon02.dvi

OR2017_curlingRating.dvi

dvi

2 ( ) i

A comparative study of the team strengths calculated by mathematical and statistical methods and points and winning rate of the Tokyo Big6 Baseball Le

<30362D8CB F95B62D8B C90E690B62D91BC3496BC976C2E706466>


Gilovich et al., 1985, p.313 Gilovich et al Adams, 1992; Albright, 1993; Koehler and Conley, 2003; Clark, 2005a, 2005b Gilovi

Studies of Foot Form for Footwear Design (Part 9) : Characteristics of the Foot Form of Young and Elder Women Based on their Sizes of Ball Joint Girth

arXiv201412_JP.dvi

大薬大紀要2008

,.,. NP,., ,.,,.,.,,, (PCA)...,,. Tipping and Bishop (1999) PCA. (PPCA)., (Ilin and Raiko, 2010). PPCA EM., , tatsukaw

The 18th Game Programming Workshop ,a) 1,b) 1,c) 2,d) 1,e) 1,f) Adapting One-Player Mahjong Players to Four-Player Mahjong

1 StarCraft esportsleague WallPlayed.org 200 StarCraft Benzene StarCraft 3 Terran Zerg Protoss Terran Terran Terran 3 Terran Zerg Zerg Worker D

1: A/B/C/D Fig. 1 Modeling Based on Difference in Agitation Method artisoc[7] A D 2017 Information Processing

1996. Vol. 16, No. 2, pp The Learning Process in "Tanoshii-Taiiku" Theory through the Spectrum of Teaching Styles Abstract In recent years, the

floodgate 15 Nine- DayFever XeonE c(NDF) gpsfish XeonX c 11 * [6]

Study on Throw Accuracy for Baseball Pitching Machine with Roller (Study of Seam of Ball and Roller) Shinobu SAKAI*5, Juhachi ODA, Kengo KAWATA and Yu


Human Welfare 8‐1☆/5.林

149 (Newell [5]) Newell [5], [1], [1], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [1] 1) 2) ( ) ( ) 3) T : 2 a : 3 a 1 :

untitled

201609発達・教育臨床論コース

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step

JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 110 Vol.28 No.22008

untitled

A Feasibility Study of Direct-Mapping-Type Parallel Processing Method to Solve Linear Equations in Load Flow Calculations Hiroaki Inayoshi, Non-member

RoboCup 1 2D 3D Figre 1 2 2D 3D 2D 2D 3D 2D 2D Earth Mover s Distance Earth Mover s Distance 3.1 (x y ) p i w pi Figure 3 opuscom Uv

bosai-2002.dvi

Bulletin of JSSAC(2014) Vol. 20, No. 2, pp (Received 2013/11/27 Revised 2014/3/27 Accepted 2014/5/26) It is known that some of number puzzles ca

Page 1 of 6 B (The World of Mathematics) November 20, 2006 Final Exam 2006 Division: ID#: Name: 1. p, q, r (Let p, q, r are propositions. ) (10pts) (a




22 [21] 2 (NPB) 2007 ( ) 3 ( ) J J ( ) [5] WBC J J J1 + [9] World Baseball Classic

Hansen 1 2, Skinner 5, Augustinus 6, Harvey 7 Windle 8 Pels 9 1 Skinner 5 Augustinus 6 Pels 9 NL Harvey ML 11 NL

独立行政法人情報通信研究機構 Development of the Information Analysis System WISDOM KIDAWARA Yutaka NICT Knowledge Clustered Group researched and developed the infor


dvi

01_渡部先生_21-2.indd

JFE.dvi

REALV5_A4…p_Ł\1_4A_OCF

untitled

「都市から地方への人材誘致・移住促進に関する調査」

<91498EE88CA D815B2E786C73>

〔 大 会 役 員 〕

橡本体資料+参考条文.PDF

Lecture on

016-22_ŒÚ”Ł

新製品開発プロジェクトの評価手法

.N..

JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 123 Vol.31 No.32012

Table 1. Assumed performance of a water electrol ysis plant. Fig. 1. Structure of a proposed power generation system utilizing waste heat from factori

雇用不安時代における女性の高学歴化と結婚タイミング-JGSSデータによる検証-

untitled


bc0710_010_015.indd

人工知能学会研究会資料 SIG-KBS-B Analysis of Voting Behavior in One Night Werewolf 1 2 Ema Nishizaki 1 Tomonobu Ozaki Graduate School of Integrated B

01-._..

Input image Initialize variables Loop for period of oscillation Update height map Make shade image Change property of image Output image Change time L

2 [] [4] (Preference Model) [8] 8km/l 3cc 3 c 29 52

Visit Japan Campaign OD OD 18 UNWTO 19 OD JNTO ODUNWTO 1 1

Web Stamps 96 KJ Stamps Web Vol 8, No 1, 2004

dvi

Comparison of the strengths of Japanese Collegiate Baseball Leagues in past 30 seasons Takashi Toriumi 1, Hirohito Watada 2, The Tokyo Big 6 Baseball

<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>

Vol.11-HCI-15 No. 11//1 Xangle 5 Xangle 7. 5 Ubi-WA Finger-Mount 9 Digitrack 11 1 Fig. 1 Pointing operations with our method Xangle Xa

7 success of the creation of Soccer town in Urawa is mainly due to strong recognition and identity by local people as the Soccer town in Urawa distric


23 A Comparison of Flick and Ring Document Scrolling in Touch-based Mobile Phones

_念3)医療2009_夏.indd

04-p45-67cs5.indd

第62巻 第1号 平成24年4月/石こうを用いた木材ペレット

短距離スプリントドリルが大学生野球選手の短距離走速度向上に与える効果

SERPWatcher SERPWatcher SERP Watcher SERP Watcher,

kubostat2015e p.2 how to specify Poisson regression model, a GLM GLM how to specify model, a GLM GLM logistic probability distribution Poisson distrib

Fig. 1. Schematic drawing of testing system. 71 ( 1 )

<30382D8CA48B868E9197BF2D8B D4E90AC90E690B62D91BC3496BC976C2E706466>

情報処理学会研究報告 IPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol.2015-GI-34 No /7/ % Selections of Discarding Mahjong Piece Using Neural Network Matsui

QXD (Page 1)

Study on Application of the cos a Method to Neutron Stress Measurement Toshihiko SASAKI*3 and Yukio HIROSE Department of Materials Science and Enginee

Centralizers of Cantor minimal systems

H22H23 4.

kiyo5_1-masuzawa.indd

2reN-A14.dvi




IPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol.2009-DPS-141 No.20 Vol.2009-GN-73 No.20 Vol.2009-EIP-46 No /11/27 1. MIERUKEN 1 2 MIERUKEN MIERUKEN MIERUKEN: Spe

3_1.dvi

浜松医科大学紀要

MRI | 所報 | 分権経営の進展下におけるグループ・マネジメント

IPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol.2009-BIO-17 No /5/26 DNA 1 1 DNA DNA DNA DNA Correcting read errors on DNA sequences determined by Pyrosequencing

4.1 % 7.5 %

03_松村悠実子.indd

IPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol.2011-MUS-91 No /7/ , 3 1 Design and Implementation on a System for Learning Songs by Presenting Musical St

1 (1983) (1980) (1980) ( 1980) ( 1997) (2006) (1980) ( ) 85

08医療情報学22_1_水流final.PDF

.,,,.,,,,,.,,,, Inoue,.,,,,.,.,,.,,,.,.,,,.,,,,,.,,.,,.,,,.,,,,

(MIRU2008) HOG Histograms of Oriented Gradients (HOG)

Transcription:

1 ( 1 ) a 2016 6 14 FIVB ( ) 1 1 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) [1] [2] (point exchange) (Elo rating)[3] [4] (ranking) (rating) a 1-501 konaka@meijo-u.ac.jp

2 1. 2. 1. 1. 2. 2. 1. ( ) ( [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10] ) [11] ( ) Massey [12] [13] [14] 1 150 200 ( ) 1 1 ( ) ( ) 2

2 2.1 FIVB (FIVB) [2] 1 1 FIVB Ranking Point System Competition name Standing Olympic World Cup World Championship Men Women 1 100 100 100 100 2 90 90 90 90 3 80 80 80 80 4 70 70 70 70 5 50 50 62 58 6 40 56 7 30 50 50 8 25 9 30 5 45 45 10 5 11 20 5 40 40 12 5 13 Tie 36 36 15 Tie 33 33 17 Tie 30 30 21 Tie 25 25 ( ) ( 4 ) 1 4 10 5 4 5 20 8( ),12( ) (ATP )[15] ( ) 3

2000 1200 4 720 8 360 16 180 32 90 64 45 128 10 25 16 2 8 64 4 1 2 5/3 ( 1000 500 250 ) (1000 500 250) 2.2 FIVB ATP FIVB i ( i ) r i i j i p i,j 1 p i,j = 1+e (ri rj). (1) [3] [16] 0.1 1 25 1 25 22.6 2 r = r i r j 0,0.01,0.02,,0.20 10 4 1 3-2, 2-3 r i r j = 0.05 2-3 12.4% 2.2.1 [3] (1) p i,j = 1 1+10 (r i r j ) 400 (2) i,j *1 *1 200 76% 4

1 0.9 0.8 3 0 3 1 3 2 2 3 1 3 0 3 Probability 0.2 0.1 0 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 r 1 Won-lost sets probability [4] [17] i,j s i,j = { 1 i win. 0 i lose. r i = r i +K(s i,j p i,j ) (4) r j (4) 1 ( ) (3) 5

(4) K 16 K r i (4) r i *2 2.2.2 1 1 ( (4) K) 1 (4) 2 2 Notations N T r = (r 1,,r NT ) T Number of teams Rating vector N S i,j,s i,s j ǫ th K k Number of sets Result of one set. Team i and j scored s i and s j points in a set. N S tuples are stored in database. Threshold value Parameter used in rating update Iteration index 0, 1 Column vector composed of zeros and ones with suitable dimensions x Euclidean norm of vector x 1. r (0) = 0 ǫ th > 0 K > 0 10 3 k = 0 N S i,j,s i,s j 2. *2 6

3. i,j,s i,s j 4. r i r j p = 1 ( ),s = s i, (5) 1+e r (k) i r (k) j s i +s j r (k+1) i = r i (k)+k(s p), (6) r (k+1) j = r j (k)+k((1 s) (1 p)). (7) 5. r (k+1) r (k) < ǫ th r (k+1) k k +1 2. 3 ( ) 3.1 1 FIVB 1 2011 ( ) 2011 11 ( ) 2012 5 ( ) 2012 5 ( ) 2012 5 ( ) 2012 2 ( ) 2012 5 2012 2012 6 7 2012 7 8 2 2015 ( ) 2015 8 9 7

( ) 2016 1 ( ) 2016 1 ( ) 2016 1 ( ) 2016 2 1( ) 2016 5 3 2011 ( ) 2011 11 12 ( ) 2012 5 ( ) 2012 5 ( ) 2012 5 ( ) 2012 1 ( ) 2012 6 2012 2012 5 7 2012 7 8 4 2015 2015 5 7 2015 ( ) 2015 9 ( ) 2016 1 ( ) 2015 10 ( ) 2016 1 ( ) 2016 1 1( ) 2016 5 3.2 2 9 ( ) 3, ( (1)) 8

( ) 5 by set 5 JPN 5 5 5 0.25 0 2 Rate difference and scoring rate in each set (London Olympic 2012, Women) 3 Regression and correlation coefficients Regression coefficient Correlation coeficcient by Set by Game by Set by Game Dataset 1 0.9983 1.0025 110 909 Dataset 2 0.9956 0.9947 549 244 Dataset 3 1.0009 1.0010 313 775 Dataset 4 0.9980 0.9965 764 413 3.3 ( ) (1) ( ) 9

5 by game 5 5 5 5 0.25 JPN 0 3 Rate difference and scoring rate in each game (London Olympic 2012, Women) 3 1 ( ) ( ) 3.4 ( ) ( ) *3 *3 10

5 by set 5 JPN 5 5 5 0.25 0 4 Rate difference and scoring rate in each set (Rio WOQT 2016, Women) 1 (FIVB 3 ( )) ( 2 3 ) ( 2 ) ( 2 ) 4 2 ( 2 3 ) (3 ) (3 ) 1 2 1 [1] Stefani Ray. The methodology of officially recognized international sports rating systems. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 7(4), 2011. [2] FIVB. FIVB volleyball world rankings. http://www.fivb.org/en/volleyball/rankings.asp. referred in 2016/6/14. 11

5 5 by game JPN 5 5 5 0.25 0 5 Rate difference and scoring rate in each game (Rio WOQT 2016, Women) [3] Arpad E. Elo. Ratings of Chess Players Past and Present. HarperCollins Distribution Services, hardcover edition, 1979. [4] World Rugby. Rankings explanation. http://www.worldrugby.org/rankings/explanation. referred in 2016/6/14. [5] Han Joo Eom and Robert W. Schutz. Statistical analyses of volleyball team performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63(1):11 18, 1992. PMID: 1574656. [6] Eleni Zetou, Athanasios Moustakidis, Nikolaos Tsigilis, and Andromahi Komninakidou. Does effectiveness of skill in complex i predict win in men s olympic volleyball games? Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 3(4), 2007. [7] Lindsay W. Florence, Gilbert W. Fellingham snd Pat R. Vehrs, and Nina P. Mortensen. Skill evaluation in women s volleyball. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 4(2), 2008. [8] Rui Manuel Araújo, José Castro, Rui Marcelino, and Isabel R Mesquita. Relationship between the opponent block and the hitter in elite male volleyball. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 6(4), 2010. [9] Marco Ferrante and Giovanni Fonseca. On the winning probabilities and mean durations of volleyball. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 10(2), 2014. [10] Tristan Burton and Scott Powers. A linear model for estimating optimal service error fraction in volleyball. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 11(2), 2015. [11] Piotr Indyk and Rajeev Motwani. Approximate nearest neighbors: towards removing the curse of dimensionality. In Proceedings of the thirtieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 604 613. ACM, 1998. [12] Ken Massey. Massey rating. http://www.masseyratings.com/. referred in 2016/6/14. [13] Hope McIlwain Elizabeth Knapper. Predicting wins and losses: A volleyball case study. The College Mathematics Journal, 46(5):352 358, 2015. 12

5 by set 5 5 5 5 0.25 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 6 Rate difference and scoring rate in each set (London Olympic 2012, Men) [14] Sam Glasson, Brian Jeremiejczyk, and Stephen R. Clarke. Simulation of women s beach volleyball tournaments. Australian Society for Operations Research, 20(2):2 7, 2001. [15] ATP World Tour. Rankings FAQ. http://www.atpworldtour.com/en/rankings/rankings-faq. referred in 2016/6/14. [16]. 2.., 2012. [17] World Rugby. World rankings confirm japan s victory as biggest shock. http://www.rugbyworldcup.com/news/111746, 10 2015. referred in 2016/6/14. 13

5 by game 5 5 5 5 0.25 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 7 Rate difference and scoring rate in each game (London Olympic 2012, Men) 5 by set 5 JPN 5 5 5 0.25 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 8 Rate difference and scoring rate in each set (Rio WOQT 2016, Men) 14

5 5 by game JPN 5 5 5 0.25 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 9 Rate difference and scoring rate in each game (Rio WOQT 2016, Men) 15