LHC・アトラス実験におけるヒッグス粒子探索の最新結果について

Similar documents
LHC-ATLAS Hà WWà lνlν A A A A A A


Hasegawa_JPS_v6

Slide 1

1

Microsoft PowerPoint - nakamuraJPS2005av2

Slide 1

nenmatsu5c19_web.key

JPS_draft.pptx

Slide 1

Μ粒子電子転換事象探索実験による世界最高感度での 荷電LFV探索 第3回機構シンポジューム 2009年5月11日 素粒子原子核研究所 三原 智

updata


Slide 1

ATLAS実験におけるトップクォーク対系 質量を関数とした生成微分断面積の測定! 山田美帆 海野義信A 神前純一A! 総研大 KEKA! 2012年 9月12日! 日本物理学会 2012年秋季大会! 京都産業大学!

Supersymmetry after Higgs discovery

余剰次元のモデルとLHC

Microsoft PowerPoint - SM_yamazaki.ppt

untitled

ATLAS実験における   レベル2ミューオントリガーの性能評価

Microsoft PowerPoint - hiei_MasterThesis


Microsoft PowerPoint - ZZ_Oda_v5.pptx

B-p タギング法を

MEG μ + e + γ ( ) ( MEGA) = (BSM) MEG μ + e + γ ( : a few ) 180 γ μ + e +

LHC ATLAS Large Hadron Collider 27km TeV ~48pb -1 ATLAS LHC Higgs Muon spectrometer MDT RPC,TGC

MRI | 所報 | 分権経営の進展下におけるグループ・マネジメント

浜松医科大学紀要

BESS Introduction Detector BESS (BESS-TeVspectrometer) Experimetns Data analysis (1) (2) Results Summary

ATLAS 2011/3/25-26

cm λ λ = h/p p ( ) λ = cm E pc [ev] 2.2 quark lepton u d c s t b e 1 3e electric charge e color charge red blue green qq

PowerPoint プレゼンテーション

The Evaluation on Impact Strength of Structural Elements by Means of Drop Weight Test Elastic Response and Elastic Limit by Hiroshi Maenaka, Member Sh

bosai-2002.dvi

TeV b,c,τ KEK/ ) ICEPP

素粒子物理学2 素粒子物理学序論B 2010年度講義第10回

土木学会構造工学論文集(2011.3)

LHC ALICE (QGP) QGP QGP QGP QGP ω ϕ J/ψ ALICE s = ev + J/ψ

kubostat2018d p.2 :? bod size x and fertilization f change seed number? : a statistical model for this example? i response variable seed number : { i

On the Wireless Beam of Short Electric Waves. (VII) (A New Electric Wave Projector.) By S. UDA, Member (Tohoku Imperial University.) Abstract. A new e

LHC ATLAS W µν Z µµ

kiyo5_1-masuzawa.indd

km_atami09.ppt




Search for other Higgs’s

Page 1 of 6 B (The World of Mathematics) November 20, 2006 Final Exam 2006 Division: ID#: Name: 1. p, q, r (Let p, q, r are propositions. ) (10pts) (a

Study on Application of the cos a Method to Neutron Stress Measurement Toshihiko SASAKI*3 and Yukio HIROSE Department of Materials Science and Enginee

J-PARC October 14-15, 2005 KEK

X線分析の進歩36 別刷

Evidence for jet structure in hadron product by e+e-

, A, A, A,,,, pSK


4.1 % 7.5 %

21 Effects of background stimuli by changing speed color matching color stimulus

<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>

DOUSHISYA-sports_R12339(高解像度).pdf

LM2940

Jan THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS XL-1 Table 1. Outline of administering doses, routes and sampling times *: 4 ml/hr/kg Bacillus subtilis

LM Watt Stereo Class D Audio Pwr Amp w/Stereo Headphone Amplifier (jp)


卒業論文はMS-Word により作成して下さい

L1 What Can You Blood Type Tell Us? Part 1 Can you guess/ my blood type? Well,/ you re very serious person/ so/ I think/ your blood type is A. Wow!/ G

Muon g-2 vs LHC (and ILC) in Supersymmetric Models

16_.....E...._.I.v2006

10-渡部芳栄.indd

SC Ł\†EŒÚ M-KL.ec6

東京電力福島第一原子力発電所の20Km以遠のモニタリング結果について(平成23年5月25日13時00分現在)/ Readings at Monitoring Post out of 20 Km Zone of Tokyo Electric Power Co., Inc. Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP(13:00 May 25, 2011)

alternating current component and two transient components. Both transient components are direct currents at starting of the motor and are sinusoidal

東京電力福島第一原子力発電所の20Km以遠のモニタリング結果について(平成23年5月28日19時00分現在)/ Readings at Monitoring Post out of 20 Km Zone of Tokyo Electric Power Co., Inc. Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP(19:00 May 28, 2011)



Corrections of the Results of Airborne Monitoring Surveys by MEXT and Ibaraki Prefecture

How to read the marks and remarks used in this parts book. Section 1 : Explanation of Code Use In MRK Column OO : Interchangeable between the new part

29 Short-time prediction of time series data for binary option trade

How to read the marks and remarks used in this parts book. Section 1 : Explanation of Code Use In MRK Column OO : Interchangeable between the new part

How to read the marks and remarks used in this parts book. Section 1 : Explanation of Code Use In MRK Column OO : Interchangeable between the new part

Electron Ion Collider と ILC-N 宮地義之 山形大学

Gauge Mediation at Early Stage LHC

W Z Large Hadron Collider LHC ATLAS LHC ATLAS Higgs 1

fx-9860G Manager PLUS_J

橡自動車~1.PDF

Microsoft PowerPoint - #07 Quiz Are you still with me .pptx

How to read the marks and remarks used in this parts book. Section 1 : Explanation of Code Use In MRK Column OO : Interchangeable between the new part

BUN, CRP K mg/ cm, 49.6 kg, BMI /72 mmhg, 92/ Hb 6.7 g/dl PT-INR CT 1 MRI 2a, b T1 T2 T1 MRI

スライド 1

PowerPoint Presentation

(43) Vol.33, No.6(1977) T-239 MUTUAL DIFFUSION AND CHANGE OF THE FINE STRUCTURE OF WET SPUN ANTI-PILLING ACRYLIC FIBER DURING COAGULATION, DRAWING AND

( ) ( ) 87 ( ) 3 ( 150mg/l) cm cm 50cm a 2.0kg 2.0kg

udc-2.dvi

Mikio Yamamoto: Dynamical Measurement of the E-effect in Iron-Cobalt Alloys. The AE-effect (change in Young's modulus of elasticity with magnetization

塗装深み感の要因解析

Lec3.pptx


Transcription:

LHC アトラス実験におけるヒッグス粒子探索の最新結果について 田中純一 東大 ICEPP

SM Higgs search@lhc ATLAS ATLAS Results H->WW->lnln H->ZZ->4l (plus CMS) H->gg (plus CMS) Combination (ATLAS and CMS) Summary Contents 2

2011 データ 3 月 13 日 10 月 30 日 LHC 加速器グループのおかげで予想をはるかに上回るデータを取ることができました Delivered L=5.61 fb -1 Recorded L=5.25 fb -1 Peak luminosity@atlas ~3.6 x 10 33 cm -2 s -1 Data-taking efficiency = ~93.6% 検出器が動いていなかった割合 = a few permil to 3.5% データ解析に使える割合 ( Good-quality decided by each detector group and performance group) = 90-96% (4.7-5.0 fb -1 ) 3

パイルアップ バンチ間隔が当初の予定の倍 (50ns) かつ ルミノシティが当初の 3-4 倍近くのためパイルアップが非常に多い Z->mm Event with 20 reconstructed vertices 8 月末 青それ以降 赤 データ量は半々 => 特に 後半データはパイルアップの効果の理解が重要 4

SM プロセスの断面積測定 SM expectationと良い一致が見られる 5fb -1 での数 ~30M W->en and mn events ~3M Z->ee and mm events ~60k ttbar events (>10 x total CDF and D0 ) 測定にはまだ昨年のデータだけのものもある データ解析中 W/Z J/psi などは Calibrations, Corrections に非常に重要 5

ヒッグス粒子の生成と崩壊 (1) 現解析では Gluon fusion が主なチャンネル VBF はまだまだ NNLO+NNLL(QCD soft-gluon)+nlo EW NNLO+NLO EW NLO m H =125GeV: 15.3pb (ggf), 1.2pb(VBF), 0.6pb(WH), 0.3pb(ZH), 0.09pb(ttH) 6

ヒッグス粒子の生成と崩壊 (2) BR も含めて 各モードのヒッグス粒子の 生成 + 崩壊 のまとめ 7

11 月までの結果 LEP+Tevatron LEP+Tevatron+ATLAS+CMS LEP m H >114.4GeV Tevatron 100<m H <109GeV 156<m H <177GeV ATLAS+CMS combination 141<m H <476GeV 124<m H <520GeV (expected) 残された領域 ( 軽い場合 ) は 114.4-141GeV ( 幅 27GeV) 8

12/13 のセミナーで見せた ATLAS の結果 今日のトーク 9

H->WW->lnln L=2.05 fb -1 (~4.8 fb -1 は解析中 ) l = electron or muon 10

H->WW->lnln L=2.05 fb -1 Event Selection Single lepton trigger 2 isolated leptons 20GeV for elec, 15GeV for muon 25GeV for the leading lepton MET rel( )>40GeV(SF), 25(DF) Jets pt>25gev, eta <4.5 etc (see the next page) Z+jets E T miss is mix of fakes and real n s top E T miss from real n s [1] cannot reconstruct Higgs mass due to 2 neutrinos [2] Df(ll)->small -> low mass(ll) 11

m H =150GeV Before mll cut 12

mt 分布 after Df(ll) cut m H =130 GeV m H =150 GeV ( 左上と同じ 130GeV が重ねてある ) 13

H->WW->lnln の結果 Selection for m H =130GeV All ee em mm Observed data 94 10 42 42 Expected BG 76(+-11) - - - Expected signal (m H =130GeV) 19(+-4) - - - Observed excluded = 145<m H <206GeV (expected:134-200gev) Maximum deviation = 1.9s for m H ~130GeV 14

H->ZZ*->4l 15

H->ZZ->4l Event Selection (ATLAS) Single lepton trigger (>99.5%) 20-22GeV for elec, 18GeV for muon 4lep pt>20, 20, 7 and 7GeV Isolated and small impact param m Z -m 12 <15GeV m 34 <115GeV && Signal acceptance with eff is ~15% for m H =125GeV. (~48% for m H =200GeV) Performance of Low pt lepton gets important. CMS for comparison Dilepton trigger 4lep pt>20, 10 and 2 x (7GeV for elec or 5GeV for muon) 50 < m 12 < 120GeV 12 < m 34 < 120GeV 49%, 78%, 61% for 4e, 4m and 2e2m (m H =190GeV) 16

Electron Performance J/Y->ee, W->en and Z->ee Challenging->Low pt electrons Systematic uncertainty 6% pt~7gev <2% pt~50gev Pileup の影響 with Z->ee No Z-mass fit constraint ~82% in +-2s 17

Z->mm Muon rec eff > 95% (4<p T <100GeV) Muon Performance MC(perfect): 2.31 Data spring: 2.89 Data summer: 2.45 Pileup の影響 with Z->mm ~85% in +-2s No Z-mass fit constraint 18

3 events (<140GeV) 124.6(4m), 124.3(2e2m), 123.6(2m2e) Excess of 212-256GeV - Expected BG 16 events - Expected signal 11 events - Observed 22 events 19

4muon candidate with m 4l =124.6GeV p T =61.2, 33.1, 17.8, 11.6GeV m 12 =89.7GeV, m 34 =24.6GeV 20

4muon candidate with m 4l =124.3GeV p T =41.5, 26.5, 24.7, 18.3GeV m 12(ee) =76.8GeV, m 34(mm) =45.7GeV 21

BG check Z+jets, where jets fakes leptons. - 2 OS same-flavor with m Z +-15GeV - 2 additional SF leptons passing all cuts except for isolation and impact param. Z+mm Z+ee b -> m Jet -> e (p +- +p 0 ) b -> e 22

H->ZZ->4l Excluded three regions : 135-158.5, 181-232.5 and 276.5-414GeV 23

H->ZZ->4l m H (GeV) Local (global) p 0 Local significance Expected 125 1.8% (~50%) 2.1s 1.4s 244 1.1% (~50%) 2.3s 3.2s 500 1.4% (~50%) 2.2s 1.5s LEE estimated over mass range: 110-600GeV 24

ATLAS vs CMS m H <180GeV Final 4e 4m 2e2m Obs. 2 3 3 Exp. 2.9 2.2 4.2 m H <160GeV 25

H->gg 26

H->gg Event selection 2g20 trigger E T >40GeV and 25GeV Isolated tight photon ETCone40<5GeV -> 22489 events in total (100<m gg <160GeV) Categorization => 9 Conversion status Eta region ptt=40gev 27

Background Processes = gg, gj and jj Fake photon jet->p 0 1/~10 4 (gluon>quark)(mc) Data η-strips jj ~ 500 μb γj ~ 200 nb ~ 30 pb H γγ ~ 40 fb 注意 : BG の成分をデータから見積もったが 最終結果には使っていない 28

Mass mgg= 2E 1 E 2 (1-cosa) Mass Reconstruction Energy(E 1 and E 2 ) & Angle(a) between 2 photons Resolution は Pileup の影響をあまり受けない Conversionでまともなトラックがある場合はトラックを使う それ以外は Calorimeterの層構造を利用する -> Primary vertexの選択にほぼ依存しない 29

Z->ee, J/Y->ee, W->en and MC Energy Calibration Energy scale at m Z ~ 0.5% Linearity < 1% Uniformity (constant term) ~1% for barrel and ~1.7% for endcap Electron -> photon by using MC MC has no constant term in this case 30

BG modeling Single exponential function with mass range of 100-160GeV Limits are obtained for 110-150GeV. Assign systematics for the choice of BG modeling 31

他の Functions もチェック 32

Systematic Uncertainties 33

H->gg の結果 m H =126GeV Local p-value = 0.27% -> 2.8s Global p-value = 7% -> 1.5s Expected = 1.6-2 x SM (110-140) Excluded = 114-115, 135-136GeV 34

35

ATLAS vs CMS Excluded = 114-115, 135-136GeV Expected = 1.6-2 x SM (110-140) Local p-value = 0.27%(2.8s)@126GeV 27 Dec, 2011 KEK セミナー Excluded = 127-131GeV Expected = 1.5-2 x SM (110-140) Local p-value = 0.96%(2.3s)@123.5GeV 36

ATLAS and CMS Combination 37

ATLAS combination ATLAS 各チャンネル 軽い部分は H->gg, H->WW->lnln, H->ZZ->4l 重い部分は H->ZZ->llnn ( 今回は更新しなかった ) 38

ATLAS combination Exclusion (95/99% CL Limit) Expected limit : 124.6 < m H < 520GeV Observed limit 95%: 112.7 < m H < 115.5GeV, 131 <m H < 453GeV except for 237-251GeV 99%: 133 < m H < 230GeV, 260 < m H < 437GeV 39

ATLAS combination Exclusion (95% CL Limit) Observed limit (95%) 112.7 < m H < 115.5GeV, 131 <m H < 453GeV except for 237-251GeV 40

ATLAS combination Excess at 126GeV Local p 0 -value: 0.019% -> 3.6s (expected ~2.4s) Global p 0 -value: 0.6% -> 2.5s with LEE over 110-146GeV Global p 0 -value: 1.4% -> 2.3s with LEE over 110-600GeV LEE=look elsewhere effect (resolution の良いチャンネルで重要 ->gg や 4l) 41

ATLAS combination Excess at 126GeV Local p 0 -value(126gev) - H->gg 2.8s - H->ZZ->4l 2.1s - H->WW->lnln 1.4s Local p 0 -value: 0.019% -> 3.6s (expected ~2.4s) Global p 0 -value: 0.6% -> 2.5s with LEE over 110-146GeV Global p 0 -value: 1.4% -> 2.3s with LEE over 110-600GeV 42

ATLAS combination SM Higgs に対する Best m 43

CMS combination 44

CMS combination Exclusion (95/99% CL Limit) Expected limit : 117 < m H < 543GeV Observed limit 95%: 127 < m H < 600GeV 99%: 128 < m H < 525GeV 45

CMS combination Excess at 119/124GeV 46

ATLAS 115.5<m H <131GeV CMS m H <127GeV ATLAS+CMS 115.5<m H <127GeV (Not combination but just AND ) 47

来年 2012 48

Higgs x-sec 7->8TeV ~30% 向上 Additional 15-20 fb -1 with 8TeV in 2012 per one experiment -> Achieve 5s for 120-130GeV in the next year. (or exclude ~125GeV mass point.) (Achieve 5s down to 115GeV with ATLAS+CMS in the next year.) 49

Summary Higgs search at LHC in this year is very exciting! ATLAS still have several channels (tt/bb etc) to be updated. 115.5 < m H < 127GeV Small excess around 124-126GeV is real? -> NO at the moment -> Still 2-3 sigma level with the look elsewhere effect. -> We need more data in the next year. 50

Backup 51

52

WW analysis, Control regions WW control regions - drop mt and Df(ll) cuts - m(ll)>80gev for m H <220GeV - m(ll)>180gev or 15<m(ll)<80GeV for m H >220GeV tt for 1-jet analysis control region - drop m T, m(ll) and Df(ll) cuts - b-jet tag 53

54

55

CMS H->gg 56

ATLAS vs CMS FWHM 4.35GeV => 3.5GeV (20% improvement!) 27 Dec, 2011 KEK セミナー 57

How to take into account LLE p global = p local + N exp(-(z 2 -Z 02 )/2) 58

CMS の図ですが Standard Model Still allowed low mass region ATLAS: 115.5<m H <131GeV CMS: m H <127GeV -> ATLAS+CMS 115.5<m H <127GeV (Not combination but just AND ) 59