教育科学と教育実践 2 Science of Education and Educational Practice - A Perspective on the Controversy on the Science of Education in Post-War Japan Part Takeo TANAKA 1950 E. J. E. J. E. J. Abstract In the latter half of 1950 s, there was the Controversy on the Science of Education in Post-War Japan. It prompted the formation of Post-War Education in Japan,through the study of the relationship between educational practice and science of education. If viewed from a different angle, Post-War Education in Japan was characteristically receptive to the pedagogy of Durkheim and Dewey who was a contemporary with the former, and it transfigured both of their theory. In this paper, significance today of the Controversy is examined by grasp of their theory, science of education and educational practice. With the development of plural society, Durkheim Renaissance is advocated again, I, therefore, think that it is necessary to study historically Dewey Renaissance in Pre- and Post -War Japan. Keywords: Science of Education, Educational Practice, Durkheim Emile, John Dewey 199
11 1 2 3 J. 4 1 2 1950 1951 1959 No.1 1954.5 1952.3 J. J. 3 200
4 5 1948.4 6 7 1950 2 2 8 science de l éducation pêdagogie 19 20 9 L Éducation Morale Levy Bruhl 10 201
11 1968 4 6 11 É Durkheim 12 science de l éducation pêdagogie J. /W.S.F. 2003 1858 J. 1859 R F 13 J. 1948 1950 1956 202
14 1937 1 1937.1 scientific study of education 7 10 1939.10 scientific movement 15 1937 5 41 4 1 1947.10 1948 4 2 1 L Éducation Morale,1925 Human nature and conduct,1921 1949 10 3 16 1956.12 17 18 Pragmatitme et Sociologie,1955 203
11 Studies in Logical Theory,1908 How We Think,1910 2 19 8 20 Democracy and Education 1916 21 8 Aims in Education 1 The Nature of an Aim 22 In our search for aims in education, we are not concerned, therefore, with finding an end outside of the educative process to which education is subordinate. Our whole conception forbids. We are rather concerned with the contrast which exists when aims belong within the process in which they operate and when they are set up from without. 23 204
1 1979.6 J. The Sources of a Science of Education 1929 24 They are the sole source of the ultimate problems to be investigated. it is the beginning and the close. 1928 Progressive Education and the Science of Education the relation of progressive education to the development of a science of education progressive schools may make to that type of a science of education which corresponds to their own type of procedure. 25 29 an art the final reality of educational science in the minds of those engaged in directing educational activities. 26 1950 The Sources of a Science of Education 1929 27 sources J. E. 205
11 28 29 30 1978 1 31 1950 E. J. E..J. 206
1 10 2012. pp.219-234 2 /W.S.F. / 2003 3 7 10 1939.10 p.21. p.23 p.24 4 1950.11 pp.72-73 5 p.162. 6 1948.4 1 1974 p.11 7 1985 p.159 8 2 1950.2 1970.7 p.158 9 1966 6 1973 p.505 10 1956 pp.17-18 6 pp.393-394 11 1968 4-6 6 p.264 12 1976.9 P.4 1978.6 p86 13 1 10 14 1948.7 p.93 p.118 15 3 p.28 16 3 1949.10 6 pp.182-183 1949.6 1942 11 J. 1942.11 p152 207
11 Democracy and Education, Chap.1 1915 p135 J Democracy and Education 1.Renewal of Life by Transmission Life is a self-renewing process through action upon the environment. Summary Since this continuance can be secured only by constant renewals,life is a self-renewing process. 1975 1 fostering nurturing cultivating rearig raising bringing up education leading or bringing up p.25 17 9 p25 6 p401 18 pp.26-27 6 p402-403 19 Pragmatitme et Sociologie 1955 1. 2. 3. pp.172-173 20 1 1970.2 pp.33-34 pp.31-32 21 1975 p142 22 p162 p170 p174 p176 23 20 p33 p.31 208
24 1 1979 p298 p19 1991. p35 1966 1971 25 John Dewey Progressive Education and the Science of Education,The LaterWorks,1925-1953,Volume3,Southern Illinois University Press, J. 26 p.26 27 1950 27 2001.6. The Sources of a Science of Education 1929 1 1960.11 11 1970.9 15 1974.9 1962.5 7 1980 1992.9 1993.5 1998.11 2003.6 28 12 pp.19-20 p.103 29 p21 pp.104-105 30 pp.24-25 p.108 31 1980.9 p.14 209