SUSY DWs
|
|
|
- つねたけ こやぎ
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 @ Supersymmetric Domain Walls Eric A. Bergshoeff, Axel Kleinschmidt, and Fabio Riccioni Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) (arxiv: ) ( )
2 Contents 1 2 SUSY Domain Walls Wess-Zumino Embedding Tensor Formalism
3 p-branes : D p p D 4 : standard branes p = D 3 : defect branes p = D 2 : Domain Walls T p (g s ) +α (l s = 1) α = 0 : fundamental α = 1 : Dirichlet α = 2 : solitonic S p-brane = T p ( ) + ( brane ) Dirac-Born-Infeld type Wess-Zumino type SUSY Domain Walls - 3 -
4 D = 10 IIA/IIB D = 10 p = 0 p = 1 p = 2 p = 3 p = 4 p = 5 p = 6 p = 7 p = 8 p = 9 α = 0 F1 IIA/IIB α = 1 D0 IIA D1 IIB D2 IIA D3 IIB D4 IIA D5 IIB D6 IIA (D7) IIB (D8) IIA (D9) IIB α = 2 NS5 IIA/IIB SUSY Domain Walls - 4 -
5 D = 10 IIA/IIB D = 10 p = 0 p = 1 p = 2 p = 3 p = 4 p = 5 p = 6 p = 7 p = 8 p = 9 α = 0 F1 IIA/IIB α = 1 D0 IIA D1 IIB D2 IIA D3 IIB D4 IIA D5 IIB D6 IIA (D7) IIB (D8) IIA (D9) IIB α = 2 NS5 IIA/IIB p 6 sources : F1 B (2), NS5 B (6), Dp C (p+1) (p 3), Dp C (p +1) (p > 4) db (2) = 10 db (6), dc (p+1) = 10 dc (7 p) 10 dc (p +1) Dp = standard branes (p 6) RR potentials C (p+1) D7 = defect branes scalar fields (+α) D8 = Domain Walls Romans mass ( ) D9 = spacetime-filling branes I SUSY Domain Walls - 5 -
6 Domain Walls (10 D8-brane Romans mass )
7 Motivation = 32 ( ) coset space G 0 /H D U-duality G 0 R- H dim(g 0 /H) T-duality IIA R IIB SL(2, R) SO(2) GL(2, R) SO(2) 3 SO(1, 1) 8 SL(3, R) SL(2, R) SO(3) SO(2) 7 SL(2, R) SL(2, R) 7 SL(5, R) Sp(2) 14 SL(4, R) 6 SO(5, 5) Sp(2) Sp(2) 25 SO(4, 4) 5 E 6(6) USp(8) 42 SO(5, 5) 4 E 7(7) SU(8) 70 SO(6, 6) 3 E 8(8) SO(16) 128 SO(7, 7) SUSY Domain Walls - 7 -
8 Motivation Domain Walls D8-brane in 10-dim. Ramond-Ramond potential C (9) 10 dc (9) = m ( ) IIA Romans massive IIA SUGRA SUSY Domain Walls - 8 -
9 Motivation Domain Walls D8-brane in 10-dim. Ramond-Ramond potential C (9) 10 dc (9) = m ( ) IIA Romans massive IIA SUGRA (D 2)-branes in D-dim. SUSY Domain Walls Domain Walls SUSY Domain Walls - 9 -
10 1 SUSY Domain Walls Wess-Zumino 7 Domain Walls
11 D8-brane in 10D D8-brane ds 2 10 = H 9 8 (y) dy 2 + H 1 8 (y) ds 2 9 e ϕ = H 5 4 (y) dilaton C = ± 1 H(y), m = ± yh(y) RR potential (Romans mass) mass m 0 RR potentials δb 2 = dσ 1, δc 1 = mσ 1 F 2 dc 1 + mb 2 : Stückelberg pairing gauging C 1 B 2 C 3 C 5 B 6 C 7 m eaten massive massless massless eaten massive SUSY Domain Walls
12 D8-brane in 10D D8-brane (D8 back reaction ) δc 9 = dλ 8 + H 3 λ 6 : RR tensor in bulk δb 2 = dσ 1 : NSNS tensor in bulk δx = 0 : transverse scalar δb µ = dσ 0 Σ 1 : D8-brane D8-brane SUSY {X, b µ ; ψ} : on-shell (8 boson + 8 fermion ) SUSY Wess-Zumino L WZ = C 9 + C 7 F = ( C e F 2 ) 9 F 2 = db 1 + B 2, H 3 = db 2 ( ) m 0 SUSY Domain Walls
13 D SUSY DWs D Wess-Zumino L WZ (A e F ) D 1 A : F : D ( ) Domain Walls A, F D U-duality G 0 1. (A, F) SUSY 2. SUSY Domain Walls SUSY Domain Walls
14 U-duality G 0 form fields D U-duality G 0 1-forms 2-forms 3-forms 4-forms 5-forms 6-forms 7-forms 8-forms 9-forms 10-forms IIA R IIB SL(2, R) GL(2, R) SL(3, R) SL(2, R) (3, 2) (3, 1) (1, 2) (3, 1) (3, 2) (8, 1) (1, 3) 7 SL(5, R) SO(5, 5) E 6(6) E 7(7) E 8(8) (6, 2) (3, 2) (15, 1) (3, 3) (3, 1) (3, 1) F.Riccioni, D.Steele and P.West, arxiv: SUSY Domain Walls
15 U-duality G 0 form fields D U-duality G 0 1-forms 2-forms 3-forms 4-forms 5-forms 6-forms 7-forms 8-forms 9-forms 10-forms IIA R IIB SL(2, R) GL(2, R) SL(3, R) SL(2, R) (3, 2) (3, 1) (1, 2) (3, 1) (3, 2) (8, 1) (1, 3) 7 SL(5, R) SO(5, 5) E 6(6) E 7(7) E 8(8) (6, 2) (3, 2) (15, 1) (3, 3) (3, 1) (3, 1) Domain walls : (D 1)-forms F.Riccioni, D.Steele and P.West, arxiv: SUSY Domain Walls
16 U-duality G 0 form fields D U-duality G 0 1-forms 2-forms 3-forms 4-forms 5-forms 6-forms 7-forms 8-forms 9-forms 10-forms IIA R IIB SL(2, R) GL(2, R) SL(3, R) SL(2, R) (3, 2) (3, 1) (1, 2) (3, 1) (3, 2) (8, 1) (1, 3) 7 SL(5) SO(5, 5) E 6(6) E 7(7) E 8(8) (6, 2) (3, 2) (15, 1) (3, 3) (3, 1) (3, 1) 7 F.Riccioni, D.Steele and P.West, arxiv: SUSY Domain Walls
17 7 SUSY DWs 7 Domain Walls = 5-branes 7D A G 0 = SL(5, R) A 1,[MN] 1-form 10 A M 2 2-form 5 A 3,M 3-form 5 A [MN] 4 4-form 10 A 5,M N 5-form 24 (adjoint) A 6,(MN) A [MN],P 6 6-forms (M, N = 1,..., 5 of SL(5, R)) SUSY Domain Walls
18 7 SUSY DWs 15 5-brane L 15 WZ A 6,(MN) + A 5,(M P F 1,N)P + A 3,(M F 3,N) +... F 3,N = db 2,N + A 3,N F 1,NP = db 0,NP + A 1,NP X y SUSY Domain Walls
19 7 SUSY DWs 15 5-brane L 15 WZ A 6,(MN) + A 5,(M P F 1,N)P + A 3,(M F 3,N) +... F 3,N = db 2,N + A 3,N F 1,NP = db 0,NP + A 1,NP X y SUSY Domain Walls
20 7 SUSY DWs 15 5-brane L 15 WZ A 6,(MN) + A 5,(M P F 1,N)P + A 3,(M F 3,N) +... F 3,N = db 2,N + A 3,N F 1,NP = db 0,NP + A 1,NP X y M = N(= 1) case : SUSY 5-branes b 2,N=1 : 4C 2 /2 = 3 b 0,[N=1,P ] : 1 4 = 4 X y : 1 8 boson + 8 fermion 1 2 -SUSY! M = 1,..., 5 SUSY Domain Walls
21 7 SUSY DWs 15 5-brane L 15 WZ A 6,(MN) + A 5,(M P F 1,N)P + A 3,(M F 3,N) +... F 3,N = db 2,N + A 3,N F 1,NP = db 0,NP + A 1,NP X y M = N(= 1) case : SUSY 5-branes 5 b 2,N=1 : 4C 2 /2 = 3 b 0,[N=1,P ] : 1 4 = 4 X y : 1 8 boson + 8 fermion 1 2 -SUSY! M = 1,..., 5 M N case : SUSY 5-branes boson 4 SUSY SUSY Domain Walls
22 7 SUSY DWs 15 5-brane L 15 WZ A 6,(MN) + A 5,(M P F 1,N)P + A 3,(M F 3,N) +... F 3,N = db 2,N + A 3,N F 1,NP = db 0,NP + A 1,NP X y M = N(= 1) case : SUSY 5-branes 5 b 2,N=1 : 4C 2 /2 = 3 b 0,[N=1,P ] : 1 4 = 4 X y : 1 8 boson + 8 fermion 1 2 -SUSY! M = 1,..., 5 5 < 15 Elementary SUSY DWs M N case : SUSY 5-branes boson 4 SUSY SUSY Domain Walls
23 7 SUSY DWs 40 L 40 WZ A [MN],P 6 + A 5,Q P F 1,RS ϵ MNQRS + A [MN] 4 F P 2 ( ) [MNP ] brane F P 2 = db P 1 + A P 2 F 1,RS = db 0,RS + A 1,RS X y SUSY Domain Walls
24 7 SUSY DWs 40 L 40 WZ A [MN],P 6 + A 5,Q P F 1,RS ϵ MNQRS + A [MN] 4 F P 2 ( ) [MNP ] brane F P 2 = db P 1 + A P 2 F 1,RS = db 0,RS + A 1,RS X y SUSY Domain Walls
25 7 SUSY DWs 40 L 40 WZ A [MN],P 6 + A 5,Q P F 1,RS ϵ MNQRS + A [MN] 4 F P 2 ( ) [MNP ] brane F P 2 = db P 1 + A P 2 F 1,RS = db 0,RS + A 1,RS X y P = M(= 1 N) case : SUSY 5-branes 20 b P 1 : 4 b 0,[RS] : 1 3 = 3 X y : 1 8 boson + 8 fermion 1 2 -SUSY! M ( 5 C 2 = 20) P M N case : SUSY 5-branes boson 4 SUSY SUSY Domain Walls
26 7 SUSY DWs 40 L 40 WZ A [MN],P 6 + A 5,Q P F 1,RS ϵ MNQRS + A [MN] 4 F P 2 ( ) [MNP ] brane F P 2 = db P 1 + A P 2 F 1,RS = db 0,RS + A 1,RS X y P = M(= 1 N) case : SUSY 5-branes 20 b P 1 : 4 b 0,[RS] : 1 3 = 3 X y : 1 8 boson + 8 fermion 1 2 -SUSY! M ( 5 C 2 = 20) P M N case : SUSY 5-branes boson 4 SUSY SUSY Domain Walls
27 7 SUSY DWs 40 L 40 WZ A [MN],P 6 + A 5,Q P F 1,RS ϵ MNQRS + A [MN] 4 F P 2 ( ) [MNP ] brane F P 2 = db P 1 + A P 2 F 1,RS = db 0,RS + A 1,RS X y P = M(= 1 N) case : SUSY 5-branes 20 b P 1 : 4 b 0,[RS] : 1 3 = 3 X y : 1 8 boson + 8 fermion 1 2 -SUSY! M ( 5 C 2 = 20) 20 < 40 Elementary SUSY DWs P M N case : SUSY 5-branes boson 4 SUSY SUSY Domain Walls
28 Elementary SUSY DWs fundamental Dirichlet solitonic (brane s tension) (g s ) +α D U T # of EDWs α = 0 α = 1 α = 2 α = 3 α = 4 α = 5 IIA R GL(2, R) SO(1, 1) 2 3 U SL(3, R) SL(2, R) SL(2, R) SL(2, R) 6 (6, 2) U (1, 2) T 4 (3, 2) T 7 SL(5, R) SL(4, R) U 4 T 4 10 T T 5 15 U 4 10 T 1 T 6 SO(5, 5) SO(4, 4) U 8 S T C T S T 8 C T 5 E 6(6) SO(5, 5) U 16 T T T T 4 E 7(7) SO(6, 6) U 32 T T T T 32 T 3 E 8(8) SO(7, 7) U 1 T 64 T T T T T T (α 6) T, 6 64 T, 7 1 T, 8 D = 3, 4, 6 S-dual branes α = α 4(D 1) D 2 D = 3, 4, 6 S-dual branes by D-dim. S-duality (g µν) S ((g s ) α d D 2 x [NG(g µν )] = (g s ) α = e 8ϕ/(D 2) (g µν ) S ) d D 2 x [NG(g µν)] SUSY Domain Walls
29 String theory origin of Domain Walls in D-dim. fundamental Dirichlet solitonic α = α 4(D 1) D 2 via S-duality D α = 0 α = 1 α = 2 α = 3 α = 4 α = 5 α = 6 α = 7 α = 8 IIA C 9 [D8] 9 C 8 [D7] E 9,1,1 [7 (0,1) 3 ] 8 C 7 [D6] E 9,2,1 [6 (1,1) 3 ] 7 C 6 [D5] D 6 [NS5] D 7,1 [KK5] D 8,2 [5 2 2] E 9,3,1 [5 (2,1) 3 ] F 9,3 [5 3 4] 6 C 5 [D4] E 9,4,1 [4 (3,1) 3 ] F 9,4,1 [4 (3,1) 4 ] 5 C 4 [D3] E 9,5,1 [3 (4,1) 3 ] F 9,5,2 [3 (3,2) 4 ] 4 C 3 [D2] E 9,6,1 [2 (5,1) 3 ] F 9,6,3 [2 (3,3) 4 ] 3 B 2 [F1] C 2 [D1] E 9,7,1 [1 (6,1) 3 ] F 9,7,4 [1 (3,4) 4 ] F 9,7,1,1 [1 (6,0,1) 4 ] G 9,6,2m G 9,6,2m+1 G 9,7,2m,1 G 9,7,2m+1,1 H 9,7,4+n,n (S 3 (C 2 )) (S 3 (B 2 )) A D T,I1 +I 2,I 2 -forms : mixed-symmetry tensors p (I 1,I 2 ) α -branes T + p + i I i = D 1 with T = 1 : transverse, p : spatial, I i : isometry directions E.A. Bergshoeff et al, arxiv: , arxiv: SUSY Domain Walls
30 Elementary SUSY DWs Z (a) : a-form central charge D R- H Z (1) Z (2) # of EDWs 9 SO(2) SO(3) SO(2) (1, 2) Sp(2) (V), 5 (T) 6 Sp(2) Sp(2) (4, 4) U Sp(8) SU(8) SO(16) # of EDWs = {(10 D) + 1} (# of Z (2) ) 5 D 9 8 D = 4 16 D = 3 ( ) standard branes central charges 1 1 SUSY Domain Walls
31 Elementary SUSY DWs D # of (D 1)-forms # of EDWs # of non-edws (6, 2) (3, 2) Elementary SUSY DWs (EDWs) (D 1)-forms EDWs (D 2)-branes ( ) EDWs 1 2-SUSY threshold bound states of EDWs EDWs 1 2-SUSY non-threshold bound states of EDWs SUSY Domain Walls
32 2 ( ) Embedding Tensor Formalism
33 coset space G 0 /H D U-duality G 0 R- H dim(g 0 /H) T-duality IIA R IIB SL(2, R) SO(2) GL(2, R) SO(2) 3 SO(1, 1) 8 SL(3, R) SL(2, R) SO(3) SO(2) 7 SL(2, R) SL(2, R) 7 SL(5, R) Sp(2) 14 SL(4, R) 6 SO(5, 5) Sp(2) Sp(2) 25 SO(4, 4) 5 E 6(6) USp(8) 42 SO(5, 5) 4 E 7(7) SU(8) 70 SO(6, 6) 3 E 8(8) SO(16) 128 SO(7, 7) SUSY Domain Walls
34 Embedding tensor formalism embedding tensor Θ M α T M Θ M α t α t α Lie G 0 global T M Lie G local µ D µ µ ga M µ T M SUSY Domain Walls
35 Embedding tensor formalism embedding tensor Θ M α T M Θ M α t α t α Lie G 0 global T M Lie G local µ D µ µ ga M µ T M [T M, T N ] = T MN P T P, T MN P Θ M α (t α ) N P [D µ, D ν ] gf M µν T M F M µν µ A M ν ν A M µ + gt [NP ] M A N µ A P ν : 0 = f αβ γ Θ M α Θ N β + (t α ) N P Θ M α Θ P γ SUSY Domain Walls
36 Embedding tensor formalism T (MN) P Θ P α = 0 [T M, T N ] = T MN P T P T (MN) P = 0 δf M µν = 2D [µ δa M ν] 2g T (P Q) M A P [µ δaq ν] δa M µ = D µ Λ M tensor gauge fields B (NP ) µν Stückelberg pairing H M µν F M µν + g T (NP ) M B (NP ) µν SUSY Domain Walls
37 Embedding tensor formalism : Θ M α dim G dim G 0 ( Dµ = µ ga M µ Θ M α t α ) M G 0 SUSY Domain Walls
38 Embedding tensor formalism : Θ M α dim G dim G 0 ( Dµ = µ ga M µ Θ M α t α ) M G 0 D U-duality G 0 constraints on R(M) R(α) 9 GL(2, R) (2 1) (3 1) = SL(3, R) SL(2, R) (3, 2) [(1, 3) (8, 1)] = (3, 2) (3, 2) (3, 4) (6, 2) (15, 2) 7 SL(5, R) = SO(5, 5) = E 6(6) = E 7(7) = E 8(8) = F.Riccioni, D.Steele and P.West, arxiv: SUSY Domain Walls
39 Θ M α D (D 1)-form SUSY Domain Walls
40 U-duality G 0 form fields D U-duality G 0 1-forms 2-forms 3-forms 4-forms 5-forms 6-forms 7-forms 8-forms 9-forms 10-forms IIA R IIB SL(2, R) GL(2, R) SL(3, R) SL(2, R) (3, 2) (3, 1) (1, 2) (3, 1) (3, 2) (8, 1) (1, 3) 7 SL(5, R) SO(5, 5) E 6(6) E 7(7) E 8(8) (6, 2) (3, 2) (15, 1) (3, 3) (3, 1) (3, 1) (D 1)-forms Embedding Tensors F.Riccioni, D.Steele and P.West, arxiv: SUSY Domain Walls
41 Θ α M D (D 1)-form (D 1)-form DWs Elementary SUSY DWs Θ α M SUSY Domain Walls
42 Θ α M D (D 1)-form (D 1)-form DWs Elementary SUSY DWs Θ α M SUSY Domain Walls
43 9 A 1, A 1,a, A 2,a, A 3 (a = 1, 2 of GL(2, R)) SUSY Domain Walls
44 9 A 1, A 1,a, A 2,a, A 3 (a = 1, 2 of GL(2, R)) embedding tensors Θ a in 2, Θ ab in 3 ; with constraints Θ a Θ bc ϵ ab = 0, Θ (a Θ bc) = 0 SUSY Domain Walls
45 9 A 1, A 1,a, A 2,a, A 3 (a = 1, 2 of GL(2, R)) embedding tensors Θ a in 2, Θ ab in 3 ; with constraints Stückelberg pairing Θ a Θ bc ϵ ab = 0, Θ (a Θ bc) = 0 δa 1 = dλ 0 Θ a λ 1,a δa 1,a = dλ 0,a ϵ ab Θ bc λ 1,c δa 2,a = dλ 1,a ϵ ab Θ b λ 2 δa 3 = dλ 2 F 2 = da 1 + Θ a A 2,a F 2,a = da 1,a + ϵ ab Θ bc A 2,c F 3,a = da 2,a + ϵ ab Θ b A 3 F 4 = da 3 SUSY Domain Walls
46 9 A 1, A 1,a, A 2,a, A 3 (a = 1, 2 of GL(2, R)) embedding tensors Θ a in 2, Θ ab in 3 ; with constraints Stückelberg pairing Θ a Θ bc ϵ ab = 0, Θ (a Θ bc) = 0 δa 1 = dλ 0 Θ a λ 1,a δa 1,a = dλ 0,a ϵ ab Θ bc λ 1,c δa 2,a = dλ 1,a ϵ ab Θ b λ 2 δa 3 = dλ 2 F 2 = da 1 + Θ a A 2,a F 2,a = da 1,a + ϵ ab Θ bc A 2,c F 3,a = da 2,a + ϵ ab Θ b A 3 F 4 = da 3 Minimal Gauging (Θ a, Θ ab ) Gauging A 1 A 1,a=1 A 1,a=2 A 2,a=1 A 2,a=2 A 3 Θ 1 = 1, Θ 2 = 0, Θ ab = 0 eaten massless massless massive eaten massive Θ a = 0, Θ 11 = 1, Θ 22 = ±1 massive eaten eaten massive massive massless Θ a = 0, Θ 11 = 1, Θ 22 = 0 massive massless eaten massive massless massless 2 SUSY Domain Walls
47 8 A 1,Ma, A M 2, A 3,a (M = 1, 2, 3 of SL(3, R), a = 1, 2 of SL(2, R)) SUSY Domain Walls
48 8 A 1,Ma, A M 2, A 3,a Minimal gauging (M = 1, 2, 3 of SL(3, R), a = 1, 2 of SL(2, R)) (Θ Ma in (3, 2) EDWs ) Θ MN a = {Θ 11 1, Θ 11 2, Θ 22 1, Θ 22 2, Θ 33 1, Θ 33 2 } in (6, 2) 6 SUSY Domain Walls
49 8 A 1,Ma, A M 2, A 3,a Minimal gauging (M = 1, 2, 3 of SL(3, R), a = 1, 2 of SL(2, R)) (Θ Ma in (3, 2) EDWs ) Θ MN a = {Θ 11 1, Θ 11 2, Θ 22 1, Θ 22 2, Θ 33 1, Θ 33 2 } in (6, 2) 6 Θ MN 1 Θ 1 MN = diag(1 p, 1 q, 0 r ) with p + q + r = 3 CSO(p, q, r) with f MN P = ϵ MNQ Θ P Q [T 1, T 2 ] = Θ 1 33 T 3, [T 2, T 3 ] = Θ 1 11 T 1, [T 3, T 1 ] = Θ 1 22 T 2 (Θ MN 2 = 0) Minimal Θ 22 1 = Θ 33 1 = 0 CSO(1, 0, 2) = Heisenberg algebra (i = 2, 3) Gauging A 1,11 A 1,12 A 1,i1 A 1,i2 A 1 2 A i 2 A 3,a Θ 11 1 = 1, others = 0 massless eaten massive massless massive massless massless (i = 2, 3) SUSY Domain Walls
50 7 A 1,MN, A M 2 (M = 1, 2,..., 5 of SL(5, R)) SUSY Domain Walls
51 7 A 1,MN, A M 2 (M = 1, 2,..., 5 of SL(5, R)) embedding tensors Θ [MN],P v [M w N]P in w NP = diag(1 p, 1 q, 0 r ) with p + q + r = 4 minimal gauging = CSO(1, 0, 3) Gauging A 1,ij A 1,12 A 1,1i A 1,2i A 1 2 A 2 2 A i 2 Θ 12,1 = 1, others = 0 massive eaten massless massless massive massless massless (i = 3, 4, 5) embedding tensors Θ (MN) in 15 5 Θ MN = diag(1 p, 1 q, 0 r ) with p + q + r = 5 minimal gauging = CSO(1, 0, 4) Gauging A 1,1i A 1,ij A 1 2 A i 2 A 3,1 Θ 11 = 1, others = 0 massive massless eaten massless massive (i = 2, 3, 4, 5) SUSY Domain Walls
52 minimal gauging elementary SUSY Domain Walls non-minimal gauging (non)-threshold bound states of EDWs SUSY Domain Walls
53
54 D Domain Walls (DWs) 1 2-SUSY DWs (EDWs) U-duality non-edws (EDWs ) Central charges ( ) EDWs minimal gauging Non-EDWs non-minimal gauging SUSY Domain Walls
55 Elementary SUSY DWs D U T # of EDWs α = 0 α = 1 α = 2 α = 3 α = 4 α = 5 IIA R GL(2, R) SO(1, 1) 2 3 U SL(3, R) SL(2, R) SL(2, R) SL(2, R) 6 (6, 2) U (1, 2) T 4 (3, 2) T 7 SL(5, R) SL(4, R) U 4 T 4 10 T T 5 15 U 4 10 T 1 T 6 SO(5, 5) SO(4, 4) U 8 S T C T S T 8 C T 5 E 6(6) SO(5, 5) U 16 T T T T 4 E 7(7) SO(6, 6) U 32 T T T T 32 T 3 E 8(8) SO(7, 7) U 1 T 64 T T T T T T (α 6) T, 6 64 T, 7 1 T, 8 D R- H Z (1) Z (2) # of EDWs 9 SO(2) SO(3) SO(2) (1, 2) Sp(2) (V), 5 (T) 6 Sp(2) Sp(2) (4, 4) U Sp(8) SU(8) SO(16) SUSY Domain Walls
56 Embedding tensor D 32-SUSY 16-SUSY 8-SUSY 9 arxiv: (unknown) 8 arxiv: (unknown) 7 hep-th/ (unknown) 6 arxiv: (unknown) arxiv: hep-th/ hep-th/ (unknown) 4 arxiv: hep-th/ arxiv: hep-th/ arxiv: arxiv: SUSY Domain Walls
57
58 Defect branes
59 U-duality G 0 form fields D U-duality G 0 1-forms 2-forms 3-forms 4-forms 5-forms 6-forms 7-forms 8-forms 9-forms 10-forms IIA R IIB SL(2, R) GL(2, R) SL(3, R) SL(2, R) (3, 2) (3, 1) (1, 2) (3, 1) (3, 2) (8, 1) (1, 3) 7 SL(5, R) SO(5, 5) E 6(6) E 7(7) E 8(8) (6, 2) (3, 2) (15, 1) (3, 3) (3, 1) (3, 1) (D 2)-forms U-duality group G 0 F.Riccioni, D.Steele and P.West, arxiv: SUSY Domain Walls
60 Wess-Zumino terms for 7-branes in 10D L WZ i A 8,i + F 2 Γ i A A 8,i : 8-forms in bulk Γ i : SO(2, 1) SL(2, R) (i = +,, 3) F 2 = (db 1, S(db 1 )) : curvatures of DBI vector and its S-dual / spinor repr. of SO(2, 1) A 6 = (B (6), C (6) ) : 6-forms in bulk / spinor repr. of SO(2, 1) i = + i = 7-brane S-dual project-out i = 3 SUSY Domain Walls
61 Wess-Zumino terms for defect branes in D-dim. Defect branes (D 2)-form potentials scalar fields U-duality group G 0 T-duality group ( R + ) d = 10 D fundamental Dirichlet solitonic U T α = 0 α = 1 α = 2 α = 3 α = 4 D 5 E d+1(d+1) SO(d, d) Adj U spinor T (Adj + singlet) T conj. spinor T D = 4 E 7(7) SO(6, 6) Adj U singlet T spinor T (Adj + singlet) T conj. spinor T singlet T D = 3 E 8(8) SO(7, 7) Adj U vector T spinor T (Adj + singlet) T conj. spinor T vector T α = α 4 by D-dim. S-duality (g µν) S ((g s ) α d D 2 x [NG(g µν )] = (g s ) α = e 8ϕ/(D 2) (g µν ) S ) d D 2 x [NG(g µν)] E.A. Bergshoeff et al, arxiv: , arxiv: , arxiv: SUSY Domain Walls
62 Defect branes (co-dim. 2) solitonic defect brane (α = 2) supersymmetric fundamental Dirichlet solitonic (brane s tension) (g s ) +α D # of SUSY defect branes α = 0 α = 1 α = 2 α = 3 α = 4 IIB (8, 1) (2, 1) 2 (3, 1) (2, 1) 2 (1, 3) 2 (1, 3) V V E.A. Bergshoeff et al, arxiv: , arxiv: , arxiv: SUSY Domain Walls
63 String theory origin of defect branes in D-dim. fundamental Dirichlet solitonic S D -dual of (Dirichlet) S D -dual of (fundamental) D α = 0 α = 1 α = 2 α = 3 α = 4 IIB C 8 [D7] E 8 = S 10 (C 8 ) [7 3 ] 9 C 7 [D6] E 8,1 = S 9 (C 7 ) [6 1 3] 8 C 6 [D5] D 6 [NS5] D 7,1 [KK5 = 5 1 2] D 8,2 [5 2 2] E 8,2 = S 8 (C 7 ) [5 2 3] 7 C 5 [D4] E 8,3 = S 7 (C 5 ) [4 3 3] 6 C 4 [D3] E 8,4 = S 6 (C 4 ) [3 4 3] 5 C 3 [D2] E 8,5 = S 5 (C 3 ) [2 5 3] 4 B 2 [F1] C 2 [D1] E 8,6 = S 4 (C 2 ) [1 6 3] F 8,6 = S 4 (B 2 ) [1 6 4] 3 [P] C 1 [D0] E 8,7 = S 3 (C 1 ) [0 7 3] F 8,7,1 [0 (6,1) 4 ] p (I 1,I 2 ) α -brane A D T,I1 +I 2,I 2 (T, p, I 1, I 2 ) α with T + p + i I i = D 1 Mass (T,p,I1,I 2 ) α = R 1 R p (R p+1 R p+i1 ) 2 (R p+i1 +1 R p+i1 +I 2 ) 3 (g s ) α SUSY Domain Walls
64 Defect branes (co-dim. 2) D G 0 /H n P n D n S IIB SL(2, R)/SO(2) SL(2, R)/SO(2) R SL(3, R)/SO(3) SL(2, R)/SO(2) SL(5, R)/SO(5) SO(5, 5)/[SO(5) SO(5)] E 6(6) /Sp(8) E 7(7) /SU(8) E 8(8) /SO(16) n P = dim G 0 : # of (D 2)-form potentials n D = dim G 0 rank G 0 : # of SUSY defect branes (rank G 0 = rank T + 1) n S = dim G 0 dim H : # of coset scalars in D-dim. maximal SUGRA SUSY Domain Walls
65 Defect branes (co-dim. 2) Z (a) : a-form central charge D R- H Z (0) Z (1) Z (2) Z (3) n D IIB SO(2) SO(2) SO(3) SO(2) Sp(2) Sp(2) Sp(2) (10, 1) + + (1, 10) U Sp(8) SU(8) SO(16) SUSY Domain Walls
66 CSO(p, q, r) CSO(p, q, r) jump CSO(p, q, 0) = SO(p, q) CSO(p, q, 1) = ISO(p, q) CSO(p, q, r) SO(p, q) U(1) r(r 1) 2 for r 2 C.M. Hull, PL 142B (1984) 39, PL 148B (1984) 297, NPB 253 (1985) 650 L. Andrianopoli et al, hep-th/ , etc. SUSY Domain Walls
YITP50.dvi
1 70 80 90 50 2 3 3 84 first revolution 4 94 second revolution 5 6 2 1: 1 3 consistent 1-loop Feynman 1-loop Feynman loop loop loop Feynman 2 3 2: 1-loop Feynman loop 3 cycle 4 = 3: 4: 4 cycle loop Feynman
Kaluza-Klein(KK) SO(11) KK 1 2 1
Maskawa Institute, Kyoto Sangyo University Naoki Yamatsu 2016 4 12 ( ) @ Kaluza-Klein(KK) SO(11) KK 1 2 1 1. 2. 3. 4. 2 1. 標準理論 物質場 ( フェルミオン ) スカラー ゲージ場 クォーク ヒッグス u d s b ν c レプトン ν t ν e μ τ e μ τ e h
susy.dvi
1 Chapter 1 Why supper symmetry? 2 Chapter 2 Representaions of the supersymmetry algebra SUSY Q a d 3 xj 0 α J x µjµ = 0 µ SUSY ( {Q A α,q βb } = 2σ µ α β P µδ A B (2.1 {Q A α,q βb } = {Q αa,q βb } = 0
q quark L left-handed lepton. λ Gell-Mann SU(3), a = 8 σ Pauli, i =, 2, 3 U() T a T i 2 Ỹ = 60 traceless tr Ỹ 2 = 2 notation. 2 off-diagonal matrices
Grand Unification M.Dine, Supersymmetry And String Theory: Beyond the Standard Model 6 2009 2 24 by Standard Model Coupling constant θ-parameter 8 Charge quantization. hypercharge charge Gauge group. simple
『共形場理論』
T (z) SL(2, C) T (z) SU(2) S 1 /Z 2 SU(2) (ŜU(2) k ŜU(2) 1)/ŜU(2) k+1 ŜU(2)/Û(1) G H N =1 N =1 N =1 N =1 N =2 N =2 N =2 N =2 ĉ>1 N =2 N =2 N =4 N =4 1 2 2 z=x 1 +ix 2 z f(z) f(z) 1 1 4 4 N =4 1 = = 1.3
[1] convention Minkovski i Polchinski [2] 1 Clifford Spin 1 2 Euclid Clifford 2 3 Euclid Spin 6 4 Euclid Pin Clifford Spin 10 A 12 B 17 1 Cliffo
![[1] convention Minkovski i Polchinski [2] 1 Clifford Spin 1 2 Euclid Clifford 2 3 Euclid Spin 6 4 Euclid Pin Clifford Spin 10 A 12 B 17 1 Cliffo](/thumbs/101/149329436.jpg "[1] convention Minkovski i Polchinski [2] 1 Clifford Spin 1 2 Euclid Clifford 2 3 Euclid Spin 6 4 Euclid Pin Clifford Spin 10 A 12 B 17 1 Cliffo")
[1] convention Minkovski i Polchinski [2] 1 Clifford Spin 1 2 Euclid Clifford 2 3 Euclid Spin 6 4 Euclid Pin + 8 5 Clifford Spin 10 A 12 B 17 1 Clifford Spin D Euclid Clifford Γ µ, µ = 1,, D {Γ µ, Γ ν
QCD 1 QCD GeV 2014 QCD 2015 QCD SU(3) QCD A µ g µν QCD 1
QCD 1 QCD GeV 2014 QCD 2015 QCD SU(3) QCD A µ g µν QCD 1 (vierbein) QCD QCD 1 1: QCD QCD Γ ρ µν A µ R σ µνρ F µν g µν A µ Lagrangian gr TrFµν F µν No. Yes. Yes. No. No! Yes! [1] Nash & Sen [2] Riemann
1. Introduction Palatini formalism vierbein e a µ spin connection ω ab µ Lgrav = e (R + Λ). 16πG R µνab µ ω νab ν ω µab ω µac ω νcb + ω νac ω µcb, e =
Chiral Fermion in AdS(dS) Gravity Fermions in (Anti) de Sitter Gravity in Four Dimensions, N.I, Takeshi Fukuyama, arxiv:0904.1936. Prog. Theor. Phys. 122 (2009) 339-353. 1. Introduction Palatini formalism
Dynkin Serre Weyl
Dynkin Naoya Enomoto 2003.3. paper Dynkin Introduction Dynkin Lie Lie paper 1 0 Introduction 3 I ( ) Lie Dynkin 4 1 ( ) Lie 4 1.1 Lie ( )................................ 4 1.2 Killing form...........................................
Step 2 O(3) Sym 0 (R 3 ), : a + := λ 1 λ 2 λ 3 a λ 1 λ 2 λ 3. a +. X a +, O(3).X. O(3).X = O(3)/O(3) X, O(3) X. 1.7 Step 3 O(3) Sym 0 (R 3 ),
1 1 1.1,,. 1.1 1.2 O(2) R 2 O(2).p, {0} r > 0. O(3) R 3 O(3).p, {0} r > 0.,, O(n) ( SO(n), O(n) ): Sym 0 (R n ) := {X M(n, R) t X = X, tr(x) = 0}. 1.3 O(n) Sym 0 (R n ) : g.x := gxg 1 (g O(n), X Sym 0
TOP URL 1
TOP URL http://amonphys.web.fc.com/ 1 19 3 19.1................... 3 19.............................. 4 19.3............................... 6 19.4.............................. 8 19.5.............................
Einstein ( ) YITP
Einstein ( ) 2013 8 21 YITP 0. massivegravity Massive spin 2 field theory Fierz-Pauli (FP ) Kinetic term L (2) EH = 1 2 [ λh µν λ h µν λ h λ h 2 µ h µλ ν h νλ + 2 µ h µλ λ h], (1) Mass term FP L mass =
.2 ρ dv dt = ρk grad p + 3 η grad (divv) + η 2 v.3 divh = 0, rote + c H t = 0 dive = ρ, H = 0, E = ρ, roth c E t = c ρv E + H c t = 0 H c E t = c ρv T
NHK 204 2 0 203 2 24 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 25 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 26 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 27 ( ) 7 00 7 50 I. ( ν R n 2 ) m 2 n m, R = e 2 8πε 0 hca B =.09737 0 7 m ( ν = ) λ a B = 4πε 0ħ 2 m e e 2 = 5.2977
0. Intro ( K CohFT etc CohFT 5.IKKT 6.
E-mail: [email protected] 0. Intro ( K 1. 2. CohFT etc 3. 4. CohFT 5.IKKT 6. 1 µ, ν : d (x 0,x 1,,x d 1 ) t = x 0 ( t τ ) x i i, j, :, α, β, SO(D) ( x µ g µν x µ µ g µν x ν (1) g µν g µν vector x µ,y
( ),.,,., C A (2008, ). 1,, (M, g) (Riemannian symmetric space), : p M, s p : M M :.,.,.,, (, ).,, (M, g) p M, s p : M M p, : (1) p s p, (
( ),.,,., C A (2008, ). 1,,. 1.1. (M, g) (Riemannian symmetric space), : p M, s p : M M :.,.,.,, (, ).,,. 1.2. (M, g) p M, s p : M M p, : (1) p s p, (2) s 2 p = id ( id ), (3) s p ( )., p ( s p (p) = p),,
25 7 18 1 1 1.1 v.s............................. 1 1.1.1.................................. 1 1.1.2................................. 1 1.1.3.................................. 3 1.2................... 3
SO(2)
TOP URL http://amonphys.web.fc2.com/ 1 12 3 12.1.................................. 3 12.2.......................... 4 12.3............................. 5 12.4 SO(2).................................. 6
Part () () Γ Part ,
Contents a 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7. 8.. 8.. 8.3. 8 Part. 9. 9.. 9.. 3. 3.. 3.. 3 4. 5 4.. 5 4.. 9 4.3. 3 Part. 6 5. () 6 5.. () 7 5.. 9 5.3. Γ 3 6. 3 6.. 3 6.. 3 6.3. 33 Part 3. 34 7. 34 7.. 34 7.. 34 8. 35
1 (Berry,1975) 2-6 p (S πr 2 )p πr 2 p 2πRγ p p = 2γ R (2.5).1-1 : : : : ( ).2 α, β α, β () X S = X X α X β (.1) 1 2
2005 9/8-11 2 2.2 ( 2-5) γ ( ) γ cos θ 2πr πρhr 2 g h = 2γ cos θ ρgr (2.1) γ = ρgrh (2.2) 2 cos θ θ cos θ = 1 (2.2) γ = 1 ρgrh (2.) 2 2. p p ρgh p ( ) p p = p ρgh (2.) h p p = 2γ r 1 1 (Berry,1975) 2-6
/ 2 n n n n x 1,..., x n 1 n 2 n R n n ndimensional Euclidean space R n vector point R n set space R n R n x = x 1 x n y = y 1 y n distance dx,
1 1.1 R n 1.1.1 3 xyz xyz 3 x, y, z R 3 := x y : x, y, z R z 1 3. n n x 1,..., x n x 1. x n x 1 x n 1 / 2 n n n n x 1,..., x n 1 n 2 n R n n ndimensional Euclidean space R n vector point 1.1.2 R n set
0406_total.pdf
59 7 7.1 σ-ω σ-ω σ ω σ = σ(r), ω µ = δ µ,0 ω(r) (6-4) (iγ µ µ m U(r) γ 0 V (r))ψ(x) = 0 (7-1) U(r) = g σ σ(r), V (r) = g ω ω(r) σ(r) ω(r) (6-3) ( 2 + m 2 σ)σ(r) = g σ ψψ (7-2) ( 2 + m 2 ω)ω(r) = g ω ψγ
x V x x V x, x V x = x + = x +(x+x )=(x +x)+x = +x = x x = x x = x =x =(+)x =x +x = x +x x = x ( )x = x =x =(+( ))x =x +( )x = x +( )x ( )x = x x x R
V (I) () (4) (II) () (4) V K vector space V vector K scalor K C K R (I) x, y V x + y V () (x + y)+z = x +(y + z) (2) x + y = y + x (3) V x V x + = x (4) x V x + x = x V x x (II) x V, α K αx V () (α + β)x
Chern-Simons Jones 3 Chern-Simons 1 - Chern-Simons - Jones J(K; q) [1] Jones q 1 J (K + ; q) qj (K ; q) = (q 1/2 q
![Chern-Simons Jones 3 Chern-Simons 1 - Chern-Simons - Jones J(K; q) [1] Jones q 1 J (K + ; q) qj (K ; q) = (q 1/2 q](/thumbs/94/118766307.jpg "Chern-Simons Jones 3 Chern-Simons 1 - Chern-Simons - Jones J(K; q) [1] Jones q 1 J (K + ; q) qj (K ; q) = (q 1/2 q")
Chern-Simons E-mail: [email protected] Jones 3 Chern-Simons - Chern-Simons - Jones J(K; q) []Jones q J (K + ; q) qj (K ; q) = (q /2 q /2 )J (K 0 ; q), () J( ; q) =. (2) K Figure : K +, K, K 0
1 Abstract 2 3 n a ax 2 + bx + c = 0 (a 0) (1) ( x + b ) 2 = b2 4ac 2a 4a 2 D = b 2 4ac > 0 (1) 2 D = 0 D < 0 x + b 2a = ± b2 4ac 2a b ± b 2
1 Abstract n 1 1.1 a ax + bx + c = 0 (a 0) (1) ( x + b ) = b 4ac a 4a D = b 4ac > 0 (1) D = 0 D < 0 x + b a = ± b 4ac a b ± b 4ac a b a b ± 4ac b i a D (1) ax + bx + c D 0 () () (015 8 1 ) 1. D = b 4ac
4. ϵ(ν, T ) = c 4 u(ν, T ) ϵ(ν, T ) T ν π4 Planck dx = 0 e x 1 15 U(T ) x 3 U(T ) = σt 4 Stefan-Boltzmann σ 2π5 k 4 15c 2 h 3 = W m 2 K 4 5.
A 1. Boltzmann Planck u(ν, T )dν = 8πh ν 3 c 3 kt 1 dν h 6.63 10 34 J s Planck k 1.38 10 23 J K 1 Boltzmann u(ν, T ) T ν e hν c = 3 10 8 m s 1 2. Planck λ = c/ν Rayleigh-Jeans u(ν, T )dν = 8πν2 kt dν c
all.dvi
38 5 Cauchy.,,,,., σ.,, 3,,. 5.1 Cauchy (a) (b) (a) (b) 5.1: 5.1. Cauchy 39 F Q Newton F F F Q F Q 5.2: n n ds df n ( 5.1). df n n df(n) df n, t n. t n = df n (5.1) ds 40 5 Cauchy t l n mds df n 5.3: t
1/2 ( ) 1 * 1 2/3 *2 up charm top -1/3 down strange bottom 6 (ν e, ν µ, ν τ ) -1 (e) (µ) (τ) 6 ( 2 ) 6 6 I II III u d ν e e c s ν µ µ t b ν τ τ (2a) (
August 26, 2005 1 1 1.1...................................... 1 1.2......................... 4 1.3....................... 5 1.4.............. 7 1.5.................... 8 1.6 GIM..........................
20 4 20 i 1 1 1.1............................ 1 1.2............................ 4 2 11 2.1................... 11 2.2......................... 11 2.3....................... 19 3 25 3.1.............................
磁性物理学 - 遷移金属化合物磁性のスピンゆらぎ理論
email: [email protected] May 14, 2009 Outline 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 2 / 262 Today s Lecture: Mode-mode Coupling Theory 100 / 262 Part I Effects of Non-linear Mode-Mode Coupling Effects of Non-linear
A 2 3. m S m = {x R m+1 x = 1} U + k = {x S m x k > 0}, U k = {x S m x k < 0}, ϕ ± k (x) = (x 0,..., ˆx k,... x m ) 1. {(U ± k, ϕ± k ) 0 k m} S m 1.2.
A A 1 A 5 A 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 1.1 1.1 (). Hausdorff M R m M M {U α } U α R m E α ϕ α : U α E α U α U β = ϕ α (ϕ β ϕβ (U α U β )) 1 : ϕ β (U α U β ) ϕ α (U α U β ) C M a m dim M a U α ϕ α {x i, 1 i m} {U,
0. I II I II (1) linear type: GL( ), Sp( ), O( ), (2) loop type: loop current Kac-Moody affine, hyperbolic (3) diffeo t
e-mail: [email protected] 0. I II I II (1) linear type: GL( ), Sp( ), O( ), (2) loop type: loop current Kac-Moody affine, hyperbolic (3) diffeo type: diffeo universal Teichmuller modular I. I-. Weyl
linearal1.dvi
19 4 30 I 1 1 11 1 12 2 13 3 131 3 132 4 133 5 134 6 14 7 2 9 21 9 211 9 212 10 213 13 214 14 22 15 221 15 222 16 223 17 224 20 3 21 31 21 32 21 33 22 34 23 341 23 342 24 343 27 344 29 35 31 351 31 352
24 I ( ) 1. R 3 (i) C : x 2 + y 2 1 = 0 (ii) C : y = ± 1 x 2 ( 1 x 1) (iii) C : x = cos t, y = sin t (0 t 2π) 1.1. γ : [a, b] R n ; t γ(t) = (x
![24 I ( ) 1. R 3 (i) C : x 2 + y 2 1 = 0 (ii) C : y = ± 1 x 2 ( 1 x 1) (iii) C : x = cos t, y = sin t (0 t 2π) 1.1. γ : [a, b] R n ; t γ(t) = (x](/thumbs/94/118744578.jpg "24 I ( ) 1. R 3 (i) C : x 2 + y 2 1 = 0 (ii) C : y = ± 1 x 2 ( 1 x 1) (iii) C : x = cos t, y = sin t (0 t 2π) 1.1. γ : [a, b] R n ; t γ(t) = (x")
24 I 1.1.. ( ) 1. R 3 (i) C : x 2 + y 2 1 = 0 (ii) C : y = ± 1 x 2 ( 1 x 1) (iii) C : x = cos t, y = sin t (0 t 2π) 1.1. γ : [a, b] R n ; t γ(t) = (x 1 (t), x 2 (t),, x n (t)) ( ) ( ), γ : (i) x 1 (t),
7 π L int = gψ(x)ψ(x)φ(x) + (7.4) [ ] p ψ N = n (7.5) π (π +,π 0,π ) ψ (σ, σ, σ )ψ ( A) σ τ ( L int = gψψφ g N τ ) N π * ) (7.6) π π = (π, π, π ) π ±
![7 π L int = gψ(x)ψ(x)φ(x) + (7.4) [ ] p ψ N = n (7.5) π (π +,π 0,π ) ψ (σ, σ, σ )ψ ( A) σ τ ( L int = gψψφ g N τ ) N π * ) (7.6) π π = (π, π, π ) π ±](/thumbs/91/106462075.jpg "7 π L int = gψ(x)ψ(x)φ(x) + (7.4) [ ] p ψ N = n (7.5) π (π +,π 0,π ) ψ (σ, σ, σ )ψ ( A) σ τ ( L int = gψψφ g N τ ) N π * ) (7.6) π π = (π, π, π ) π ±")
7 7. ( ) SU() SU() 9 ( MeV) p 98.8 π + π 0 n 99.57 9.57 97.4 497.70 δm m 0.4%.% 0.% 0.8% π 9.57 4.96 Σ + Σ 0 Σ 89.6 9.46 K + K 0 49.67 (7.) p p = αp + βn, n n = γp + δn (7.a) [ ] p ψ ψ = Uψ, U = n [ α
量子力学 問題
3 : 203 : 0. H = 0 0 2 6 0 () = 6, 2 = 2, 3 = 3 3 H 6 2 3 ϵ,2,3 (2) ψ = (, 2, 3 ) ψ Hψ H (3) P i = i i P P 2 = P 2 P 3 = P 3 P = O, P 2 i = P i (4) P + P 2 + P 3 = E 3 (5) i ϵ ip i H 0 0 (6) R = 0 0 [H,
Mｏｔｔ散乱によるParity対称性の破れを検証
Mott Parity P2 Mott target Mott Parity Parity Γ = 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 t P P ),,, ( 3 2 1 0 1 γ γ γ γ γ γ ν ν µ µ = = Γ 1 : : : Γ P P P P x x P ν ν µ µ vector axial vector ν ν µ µ γ γ Γ ν γ
(τ τ ) τ, σ ( ) w = τ iσ, w = τ + iσ (w ) w, w ( ) τ, σ τ = (w + w), σ = i (w w) w, w w = τ w τ + σ w σ = τ + i σ w = τ w τ + σ w σ = τ i σ g ab w, w
S = 4π dτ dσ gg ij i X µ j X ν η µν η µν g ij g ij = g ij = ( 0 0 ) τ, σ (+, +) τ τ = iτ ds ds = dτ + dσ ds = dτ + dσ δ ij ( ) a =, a = τ b = σ g ij δ ab g g ( +, +,... ) S = 4π S = 4π ( i) = i 4π dτ dσ
Siegel Hecke 1 Siege Hecke L L Fourier Dirichlet Hecke Euler L Euler Fourier Hecke [Fr] Andrianov [An2] Hecke Satake L van der Geer ([vg]) L [Na1] [Yo
![Siegel Hecke 1 Siege Hecke L L Fourier Dirichlet Hecke Euler L Euler Fourier Hecke [Fr] Andrianov [An2] Hecke Satake L van der Geer ([vg]) L [Na1] [Yo](/thumbs/96/128156654.jpg "Siegel Hecke 1 Siege Hecke L L Fourier Dirichlet Hecke Euler L Euler Fourier Hecke [Fr] Andrianov [An2] Hecke Satake L van der Geer ([vg]) L [Na1] [Yo")
Siegel Hecke 1 Siege Hecke L L Fourier Dirichlet Hecke Euler L Euler Fourier Hecke [Fr] Andrianov [An2] Hecke Satake L van der Geer ([vg]) L [Na1] [Yo] 2 Hecke ( ) 0 1n J n =, Γ = Γ n = Sp(n, Z) = {γ GL(2n,
第86回日本感染症学会総会学術集会後抄録（I）
κ κ κ κ κ κ μ μ β β β γ α α β β γ α β α α α γ α β β γ μ β β μ μ α ββ β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β γ β μ μ μ μμ μ μ μ μ β β μ μ μ μ μ μ μ μ μ μ μ μ μ μ β
K E N Z U 2012 7 16 HP M. 1 1 4 1.1 3.......................... 4 1.2................................... 4 1.2.1..................................... 4 1.2.2.................................... 5................................
meiji_resume_1.PDF
β β β (q 1,q,..., q n ; p 1, p,..., p n ) H(q 1,q,..., q n ; p 1, p,..., p n ) Hψ = εψ ε k = k +1/ ε k = k(k 1) (x, y, z; p x, p y, p z ) (r; p r ), (θ; p θ ), (ϕ; p ϕ ) ε k = 1/ k p i dq i E total = E
A11 (1993,1994) 29 A12 (1994) 29 A13 Trefethen and Bau Numerical Linear Algebra (1997) 29 A14 (1999) 30 A15 (2003) 30 A16 (2004) 30 A17 (2007) 30 A18
2013 8 29y, 2016 10 29 1 2 2 Jordan 3 21 3 3 Jordan (1) 3 31 Jordan 4 32 Jordan 4 33 Jordan 6 34 Jordan 8 35 9 4 Jordan (2) 10 41 x 11 42 x 12 43 16 44 19 441 19 442 20 443 25 45 25 5 Jordan 26 A 26 A1
ｎｓｇ０２－１３／ｋｙ０４５０５９３０１６０００３３２１０
φ φ φ φ κ κ α α μ μ α α μ χ et al Neurosci. Res. Trpv J Physiol μ μ α α α β in vivo β β β β β β β β in vitro β γ μ δ μδ δ δ α θ α θ α In Biomechanics at Micro- and Nanoscale Levels, Volume I W W v W
[Ver. 0.2] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1 1.1 1 1.2 1. (elasticity) 2. (plasticity) 3. (strength) 4. 5. (toughness) 6. 1 1.2 1. (elasticity) } 1 1.2 2. (plasticity), 1 1.2 3. (strength) a < b F
TOP URL 1
TOP URL http://amonphys.web.fc.com/ 3.............................. 3.............................. 4.3 4................... 5.4........................ 6.5........................ 8.6...........................7
1. 1 A : l l : (1) l m (m 3) (2) m (3) n (n 3) (4) A α, β γ α β + γ = 2 m l lm n nα nα = lm. α = lm n. m lm 2β 2β = lm β = lm 2. γ l 2. 3
1. 1 A : l l : (1) l m (m 3) (2) m (3) n (n 3) (4) A 2 1 2 1 2 3 α, β γ α β + γ = 2 m l lm n nα nα = lm. α = lm n. m lm 2β 2β = lm β = lm 2. γ l 2. 3 4 P, Q R n = {(x 1, x 2,, x n ) ; x 1, x 2,, x n R}
SO(3) 7 = = 1 ( r ) + 1 r r r r ( l ) (5.17) l = 1 ( sin θ ) + sin θ θ θ ϕ (5.18) χ(r)ψ(θ, ϕ) l ψ = αψ (5.19) l 1 = i(sin ϕ θ l = i( cos ϕ θ l 3 = i ϕ
SO(3) 71 5.7 5.7.1 1 ħ L k l k l k = iϵ kij x i j (5.117) l k SO(3) l z l ± = l 1 ± il = i(y z z y ) ± (z x x z ) = ( x iy) z ± z( x ± i y ) = X ± z ± z (5.118) l z = i(x y y x ) = 1 [(x + iy)( x i y )
( ) ) ) ) 5) 1 J = σe 2 6) ) 9) 1955 Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes )
( 3 7 4 ) 2 2 ) 8 2 954 2) 955 3) 5) J = σe 2 6) 955 7) 9) 955 Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes 957 ) 3 4 2 A B H (t) = Ae iωt B(t) = B(ω)e iωt B(ω) = [ Φ R (ω) Φ R () ] iω Φ R (t)
(Tokyo Institute of Technology) Seminar at Ehime University ( ) 9 3 U(N C ), N F /2 BPS ( ) 12 5 (
(Tokyo Institute of Technology) Seminar at Ehime University 2007.08.091 1 2 1.1..................... 2 2 ( ) 9 3 U(N C ), N F 11 4 1/2 BPS ( ) 12 5 ( ) 19 6 Conclusion 23 1 1.1 GeV SU(3) SU(2) U(1): W
k + (1/2) S k+(1/2) (Γ 0 (N)) N p Hecke T k+(1/2) (p 2 ) S k+1/2 (Γ 0 (N)) M > 0 2k, M S 2k (Γ 0 (M)) Hecke T 2k (p) (p M) 1.1 ( ). k 2 M N M N f S k+
1 SL 2 (R) γ(z) = az + b cz + d ( ) a b z h, γ = SL c d 2 (R) h 4 N Γ 0 (N) {( ) } a b Γ 0 (N) = SL c d 2 (Z) c 0 mod N θ(z) θ(z) = q n2 q = e 2π 1z, z h n Z Γ 0 (4) j(γ, z) ( ) a b θ(γ(z)) = j(γ, z)θ(z)
‚åŁÎ“·„´Šš‡ðŠp‡¢‡½‹âfi`fiI…A…‰…S…−…Y…•‡ÌMarkovŸA“½fiI›ð’Í
Markov 2009 10 2 Markov 2009 10 2 1 / 25 1 (GA) 2 GA 3 4 Markov 2009 10 2 2 / 25 (GA) (GA) L ( 1) I := {0, 1} L f : I (0, ) M( 2) S := I M GA (GA) f (i) i I Markov 2009 10 2 3 / 25 (GA) ρ(i, j), i, j I
Macdonald, ,,, Macdonald. Macdonald,,,,,.,, Gauss,,.,, Lauricella A, B, C, D, Gelfand, A,., Heckman Opdam.,,,.,,., intersection,. Macdona
Macdonald, 2015.9.1 9.2.,,, Macdonald. Macdonald,,,,,.,, Gauss,,.,, Lauricella A, B, C, D, Gelfand, A,., Heckman Opdam.,,,.,,., intersection,. Macdonald,, q., Heckman Opdam q,, Macdonald., 1 ,,. Macdonald,
42 3 u = (37) MeV/c 2 (3.4) [1] u amu m p m n [1] m H [2] m p = (4) MeV/c 2 = (13) u m n = (4) MeV/c 2 =
![42 3 u = (37) MeV/c 2 (3.4) [1] u amu m p m n [1] m H [2] m p = (4) MeV/c 2 = (13) u m n = (4) MeV/c 2 =](/thumbs/73/68712188.jpg "42 3 u = (37) MeV/c 2 (3.4) [1] u amu m p m n [1] m H [2] m p = (4) MeV/c 2 = (13) u m n = (4) MeV/c 2 =")
3 3.1 3.1.1 kg m s J = kg m 2 s 2 MeV MeV [1] 1MeV=1 6 ev = 1.62 176 462 (63) 1 13 J (3.1) [1] 1MeV/c 2 =1.782 661 731 (7) 1 3 kg (3.2) c =1 MeV (atomic mass unit) 12 C u = 1 12 M(12 C) (3.3) 41 42 3 u
.5 z = a + b + c n.6 = a sin t y = b cos t dy d a e e b e + e c e e e + e 3 s36 3 a + y = a, b > b 3 s363.7 y = + 3 y = + 3 s364.8 cos a 3 s365.9 y =,
[ ] IC. r, θ r, θ π, y y = 3 3 = r cos θ r sin θ D D = {, y ; y }, y D r, θ ep y yddy D D 9 s96. d y dt + 3dy + y = cos t dt t = y = e π + e π +. t = π y =.9 s6.3 d y d + dy d + y = y =, dy d = 3 a, b
compact compact Hermann compact Hermite ( - ) Hermann Hermann ( ) compact Hermite Lagrange compact Hermite ( ) a, Σ a {0} a 3 1
014 5 4 compact compact Hermann compact Hermite ( - ) Hermann Hermann ( ) compact Hermite Lagrange compact Hermite ( ) 1 1.1. a, Σ a {0} a 3 1 (1) a = span(σ). () α, β Σ s α β := β α,β α α Σ. (3) α, β