第６章.indd

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "第６章.indd"

あまめつねざき
5 years ago
Views:

1 Mountford, Hassell & Perrewe, 1995; Karpinska et al., 2013; Leisink & Knies, 2011 Kooij & Van de Voorde, 2015 Armstrong- Stassen, 2008 Armstrong-Stassen & Usel, 2009 Kanfer & Ackerman, 2004; Kooij et al., 2015 Kooij et al Bal et al SOC Freund,2006; Freund & Baltes, 2002; Kooij et al., 2010; Kooij et al., Bal et al., Rousseau, 2005;

2 3, 2011;, 2016 a 60, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2013;, 2016 a 2, 2012, 2011;, , 2016b 65 2, 2013;, 2016 a a Nishii et al HR practices

3 , , % 49.7% 44.6%

4 2 在 Armstrong-Stassen & Usel, 2009 Eisenberger & Humtington, 1997; Roades & Eisenberger, 2002 Armstrong-Stassen, 2008 Eisenberger & Humtington,1997 Purcell & Hutchison , Leisink & Knies % 66.3% 24.7% 63.5%

5 % % % 86.8% 13.2% 34.4% 2.0% 25.0% 14.7% 15.2% % 0.9% % % % % % % % 5.8% 0.4% 11.4% 7.4% 6.5% 74.3% 1 7.8% % % % % 3 1 5% 100% 90% 70% 50% 10% 0% 71.7% SD SD SD SD SD

6 SD SD SD SD Roades & Eisenberger, SD SD SD SD

7 SD =0.113 p 0.05 =0.160 p 0.01 =0.117 p p B S.E B S.E * * ** * * * R F 3.713** 3.610** R N ** p 0.01 * p

8 =0.117 p 0.05 Carstensen et al., Guest, 2001; Purcell & Hutchison, 2007 ; McGovern et al., 1997 Purcell & Hutchison, 2007 McGovern et al.,1997 Leisink & Knies

9 1 March & Simon, 1993 Hassel, McGovern et al Danserueau et al., 1975 Danserueau et al., 1975 Liden & Graen, 1980 Leader-Member-Exchange 8 8 Bakkinger et al., 2010; Graen et al., 1982; Liden & Graen, 1980 Wayne et al., 2002 Wayne et al., 1997 Setton et al.,1996; Wayne et al., 2002 Scandura et al., 1986 Liden et al

10 Vertical Dyad Linkage Liden & Graen, 1980 Danserueau et al., Bernerth et al., 2007 Liden & Graen, 1980 Bauer & Green, 1996; Scandura, Graen & Novak, 1986 Bauer & Green

11 Freud 2006 SOC Freund & Baltes, 2002; 9 Carstensen et al.,1997 Maurer et al., 2003; Raemdonck et al., Ostroff & Atwater, 2003; Tsui & O'reilly,1989 Perry, Kulik & Zhou, 1999 Bauer & Green, 1996; Liden & Wayne, 1993; Ostroff & Atwater, 2003 ; Tsui & O'reilly, 1989; Turban & Jones, 1998 Turban & Jones, 1998 Bauer & Green,

12 LMX Collin, Hair & Rocco, 2008 Perry, Kulik & Zhou, 1999 Turban & Jones, % % % % 86.8% 13.2% 33.6% 3.1% 23.3% 14.8% 17.6% % 0.3% % % % % % % % 6.9% 0.3% 11.0% 4.4% 6.0% 69.8% 8.5% 1 6.3% % % % %

13 SD SD= SD= SD SD= SD= SD SD

14 SD SD Model B= p Model B= n.s 2 5 Mode l 3 7 Model 4: B=0.679, p 0.01 Model 6: =0.070, n.s Model 5: B=0.264, n.s Model 7: = 0.011, n.s Model 2 3 Model 2; B=0.097, n.s Model 3; B=0.359, p

15 6 2 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Model 6 Model ** * ** ** 熟考 ** 尊重 * ** ** ** * * * * ** * ** ** ** ** ** ** R Cox & Snell R F ** ** ** ** ** ** ** N ** p 0.01 * p Model 1 5 Model Model

16 4 1 1 Knies & Leisink , ,

18 % % % % 82.1% 17.9% 39.6% 1.4% 23.0% 13.8% 16.3% % 0.8% % % % % % % % 5.4% 0.3% 12.7% 5.7% 3.5% 69.9% 7.9% % % % % SD= SD= SD= SD= SD= SD= r p SD SD SD

19 , p 0.01 =0.498, p =-0.018, n.a =0.029, n.a ** ** ** R ** ** R ** F ** ** N ** ** ** * R ** ** R ** F ** ** N ** p 0.01 * p 0.05 =0.056, n.a =0.152, p % =0.450, p 0.01 =0.154, p

20 4 3.7% = 0.551, p

21 4 2, 2012, 2016 a a

22 Shore et al., Kraimer et al Maurer et al Raemdonck et al Van Vianen et al

et al., 2014 Bal 2) et al., a b a a 3)

et al., 2014 Bal 2) et al., a b a a 3) 282017pp. 31 54 2 Mountford, 2012 2 Hassell & Perrewe, 1995 Karpinska et al., 2013 Leisink & Knies, 2011 Kooij & Van de Voorde, 2015 Armstrong-Stassen, 2008Armstrong-Stassen & Usel, 2009 Kanfer & Ackerman,