Sakamoto Shigeki ICRW ICJ ICJ ICJ ICJ ICJ ICJ ICJ ITLOS ICJ 4 7 NZ 201

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Sakamoto Shigeki ICRW ICJ ICJ ICJ ICJ ICJ ICJ ICJ ITLOS ICJ 4 7 NZ 201"

こうざぶろうたけはな
5 years ago
Views:

1 Sakamoto Shigeki ICRW ICJ ICJ ICJ ICJ ICJICJ ICJ ITLOS ICJ 4 7 NZ NZ NZ No

2 NZ ICJ NZ ICJ Keith H. Charlesworth 9 16 NZ NZ ICJ NZ 2 NZ NZ NZ ICJ NZ Cançado Trindade NZ ICJ ICRW 8 1 ICRW 8 1 No

3 JARPA JARPA II 8 ICRW 10 e 7 b JARPA II 30 ICRW 1 10 e 10 e ICRW 14 JARPA II ICRW 8 15 Yusuf JARPA II IWC ICJ 18 ICJ b ICJ ICJ JARPA II b No

4 JARPA II EEZ 19 b 20 ICJ ICJ ICJ b ICJ 25 locus standi 2 ICJ 30 6 JARPA II ICRW e 3 10 d 7 d 4 5 JARPA II 7 26 ICJ ICRW No

5 ICRW 1 1 IWC IWC IWC evolving instrument 45 ICRW 8 ICRW 8 ICRW 55 NZ free-standing article 27 ICRW ICJ ICRW ICJ cumulative scientific research 83 2 for purposes of 1 IWC a b 2 ICRW IWC 83 IWC 31 ICJ JARPA II No

6 88 JARPA II JARPA II JARPA II a b c JARPA II ICJ 135 i IWC ii iii 20 JARPA II 137 JARPA II IWC JARPA II JARPA II arbitrary JARPA II JARPA II IWC JARPA II No

7 JARPA II JARPA II JARPA II 10 e JARPA II 10 d 7 b ICJ locus standi locus standi D. Bhandari JARPA II ICRW 38 JARPA II 39 ICRW ICRW ICRW No

8 ICRW 40 NZ ICRW 41 NZ obligation erga omnes partes ICRW ICJ 2012 ICJ 2 I.C.J. Reports 1979, p. 32, para. 33 obligation erga omnes partes a b ILC 43 ICRW ICRW IWC IWC ICJ obligation erga omnes partes locus standi ICJ for purposes of scientific research ICRW 8 1 for purposes of scientific research for purposes of scientific research 2 45 No

9 ICJ 8 61 Xue JARPA II JARPA II 46 IWC 47 ICJ JARPA II JARPA II 48 Abraham for purposes of scientific research 49 8 for purposes of scientific research ICJ 3 JARPA II ICRW 8 ICJ No

10 arbitrary 51 JARPA II ICJ 10 e ICRW 1946 ICRW JARPA II ICJ IWC IWC 45 ICRW 56 rule of intertemporality static No

11 ICRW 31 3 c 850 ICRW 8 68 ICRW IWC NZ 68 ICRW 8 JARPA II ICJ e JARPA II ICJ NZ 30 IWC No

12 IWC ICJ NZ 61 IWC ICRWNZ ICJ ICJ IWC ICJ JARPA II 8 ICRW ICJ ICJ IWC 246 JARPA 1 Application instituting Proceedings filed in the Registry of the Court on 31 may 2010, Whaling in the Antarctic Australia v. Japan, para Whaling in the Antarctic Australia v. Japan, Order of 13 July 2010, I.C.J. Reports 2010, p Press Release 4 Application, op. cit., para ICJ v v v v v. 5 8 Australia and New Zealand agree on strategy for whaling legal case, available at releases/2010/kr_mr_ html. 9 ICJ 31 2 judge ad hoc 10 Whaling in the Antarctic Australia v. Japan, Declaration of Intervention Pursuant to Article 63 of the Statute of No

13 the Court by the Government of New Zealand, available at 11 Whaling in the Antarctic Australia v. Japan, Declaration of Intervention of New Zealand, Order of 6 February 2013, paras. 8, 19 and Declaration of Judge Owada, paras Separate Opinion of Judge Cançado Trindade, para Counter-Memorial of Japan, 9 March Dissenting Opinion of Judge Yusuf, para Xue Abraham Bennouna Yusuf 18 Whaling in the Antarctic Australia v. Japan: New Zealand Intervening, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2014 Judgment, para Ibid., paras Ibid., paras Ibid., para Ibid., para Ibid., para Ibid., para Fisheries Jurisdiction Spain v. Canada, Jurisdiction of the Court, Judgment of 4 December 1998, I.C.J. Reports 1998, p. 454, para Tomka Sepúlveda-Amor Keith Skotnikov Cançado Trindade Greenwood Xue Donoghue Gaja Sebutinde Bhandari Charlesworth Owada Abraham Bennouna Yusuf Judgment, para Counter-Memorial of Japan, para Judgment, paras. 45, and Ibid., paras. 61, and Memorial of Australia, 9 May 2001, pp , para Judgment, paras. 69, 71 and Ibid., paras. 88 and Ibid., paras. 135, 137 and Ibid., paras and Ibid., paras Dissenting Opinion of Judge Yusuf, pp. 1 2, para Judgement, paras CR2013/13, p. 73, para CR2013/18, p. 28, para Ibid., pp , paras CR2013/17, p. 33, para Questions relating to the obligation to prosecute or extradite Belgium v. Senegal, Judgment of 20 July 2012, I.C.J. Reports 2012, para. 68. No

14 43 Commentary on Article 48, para. 7, Yearbook of International Law Commission, 2001, Vol. 2, Part. 2, p Judgment, para Separate Opinion of Judge Xue, p. 4, para Dissenting Opinion of Judge Yusuf, p. 1, para Dissenting Opinion of Judge Owada, p. 10, para Opinion Dissidente de M. Le Juge Abraham, p. 8, para Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay Argentina v. Uruguay, Judgment of 20 April 2010, I.C.J. Reports 2010, para Judgment, para Ibid. 53 Ibid., para Ibid., para ICRW ICJ 1971 Legal Consequence for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia South West Africa notwithstanding Security Council Resolution , Advisory Opinion of 21 June 1971, I.C.J.Reports 1971, para managed common area Donald R. Rothwell and Tim Stephens, The International Law of the Sea, Hart Publishing, 2010, p Dissenting Opinion of Judge Owada, p. 15, para shsakamo@doshisha.ac.jp No

565†i“â„³”††j

565†i“â„³”††j Sakamoto Shigeki 4 1 1997 34 40 27 52 12 without prejudice clause 1998 1996 9 2 EEZ 1974 7 3 EEZ EEZ No. 565 2007 10 15 EEZ EEZ 4 50 5 6 1982 1 1 2 1952 31905 1951 7 1616 80 1696 1905 2 1898 1943 No. 565