|
|
|
- あいぞう こいたばし
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 GRIPS Development Forum Policy Minutes No.12 December 2002
2
3 OECD (IMF) DC 1
4 IMF 2 Knowledge Bank
5 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (4) NGO (7) 3
6 ODA ODA 3 4
7 GDLN GDLN WBI (World Bank Institute) 1 (1) 10 JICA JICA OB 5
8 (2) NGO (3) JICA JPO JPO 6
9 2 (1) 2 JICA JICA (Community-Driven Development) NGO NGO CDD NGO NGO NGO (2) (Trust Fund) 7
10 3 (1) WSSD WSSD (2) ODA ODA ODA ODA 8
11 (3) 13 (4) (5) NHK 5 UNHCR ODA 1 2 (6) close disclose PR 9
12 (7) (8) (a) (b) IMF IMF G7 IMF DC 10
13 11 (9) (10) (11) DC ODA
14 (12) NGO 20 JICA 2 4 (1) NGO (2) 5 (1)
15 (2) JBIC JICA ODA 50 9% ODA (3) ODA ODA ODA 1 13
16 1 JBIC JICA IDA GNP TICAD3 14
17 NGO PRSP ( ) IMF ( ) DC 15
18 1 IDA 50 1 NGO 2 1 GNP (1) 80 (2) 16
19 (3) 1990 (4) 90 IDA (Performance-Based Allocation) 50 (5) PRSP CDF Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) (6) Community-Driven Development 10 17
20 95 40 (Community-Driven Development) NGO 80 (7) 1 (8) Filmer and Pritchett (1999). 18
21
22 ASEAN PRSP Low Income Country Under Stress: LICUS 6 PRSP JICA JBIC 20
23 7 JBIC JICA NGO PRSP PRSP 8 EBRD OB 21
24 9 NGO 2 e- PRSP 10 NGO NGO PRSP MDG NGO PRSP 11 PRSP PPA PER CFAAR PSPIA FSAP JICA
25 CDF ICT NGO 23
26 3 PRSP NGO 4 15 PRSP PRSP 24
27 5 3 1 CAS 6 IDA Economic Rate of Return IDA Economic Rate of Return Economic Rate of Return 7 NGO USAID DFID JICA JBIC 4 NGO IMF 25
28 IMF
29 PRSP NGO
30 12 NGO 13 JICA JBIC D E DFID 28
31 14 TA PRSP PRSP 1 PRSP 29
32 work PRSP 30
33 40 Institution Building PRSP 15 PHRD PHRD 31
34 TOR PHRD 32
35 TOR 16 PRSP PRSP PRSP / I-PRSP NGO USAID 1 1 PRSP 2 PRSP 33
36 IDA UNDP IDA PRSP 1 PSPIA PREM Poverty Reduction and Economic Management PRSP 34
GRIPS Development Forum Policy Minutes No.16 December 2002 2002 11 7 1 2 12 2 3 4 UNHCR 5 1927 1963 1976 1979 1980 1987 1989 1991 2000 2001 6 2001 11 DC 1 1 6 9 11 (permeability) 2 1998 99 12 2 2 3 (working
第3章 日本の対タンザニア援助の評価
46,500 km 2 1.1 67 2 60 20 150 105 10 35 1972 4 3 1998 1 2001 2005 3 9 20 12 100 2008 2006 12 2008 2005 11 Good Governance Plus 20 Dzongkhag201 Gewog1981 DYT1991 GYT2002 6 DYTGYT 10 Gup DYT DYT 2-1 2 50
<30335F8FAC88E490EC8E812E696E6464>
ODA ODA ODA ODA Lodge and WilsonStiglitz MDGs DAC HIV HIV United Nations OECD DAC OECD OECD DAC DAC DAC ODA ODA ODA ODA GNP GDP ODA Chun ODA ODA OECD ODA ODA ODA ODA ODA ODA ODA a ODA OECD EDCF Economic
No.3728 6 3 3,000 9 10 6 3 2 6 No.3729 6 6
No.3726 6 1 6 6 7 11 B A 9 10 11 11 1 2 4 2 4 1 No.3727 6 2 800 50 1,000 9 10 11 50 1 2 3 4 4 No.3728 6 3 3,000 9 10 6 3 2 6 No.3729 6 6 4 95 7 4 8 10 1 No.3730 6 7 6 53 8 11 No.3731 6 8 15 8 11 2 2035
km 2 7, AKP Adalet ve Kalkinma Partisi AKP AKP EU IMF AKP GNI 5,
3 3-1 3-1-1 1. 2780.576km 2 7,20620057 99 1982 2. 5504 5 81 194920077 AKPAdalet ve Kalkinma Partisi20024782 AKP AKPEUIMF AKP 3-1-2 GNI5,4082006 220001120012IMF 19992002206 3-1 20022006GDP7 199884.72006
第3章 基礎教育とわが国の教育協力-パキスタンの事例-
Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1 4 7 1858 1947 1971 GDP 4 1 7 1997 296 1998 5 2 99 99 10 1 1959 1 1990 2 20 1980 7 free(compulsory) 15 3 12 B C B 1980 1990 7 1998 45 174 159 (1998) 1 GNP 470 440 490 2 45
2005 No ,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5, , , ,000 4, ,000 3,000 2,000 1, , , , , ,875.0
2005No.1322 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,471.8 6,657.6 8,353.9 5,000 4,555.3 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 483.5 896.9 1,438.2 2,063.6 2,810.7 3,281.8 3,875.0 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
伝統的な経済学では、「消費は重要ではあるが、気にしなくてもよい」と考えられてきた
2005 1 2004 SARS 2003 IMF 2004 5.0 2004 4.1 0.9 30 2005 2004 2005 2005 2005 2004 2005 IMF 2005 4.3 2004 IMF 2004 2003 3.0 4.3 2003 2 2003 2004 IT 2005 IMF 2005 2004 3.5 IT 1995 10 2.8% 10 2 1 IT IT 2004
ADB AsDF CIDA DDC DFID GDI GDP GIZ HDI IDA IDCJ JICA LGCDP MC/PM MDC NGO ODA SDC SWC UML UNDP UNMIN VDC Asian Development Bank Asian Development Fund
1996 2 10 1997 NGO 2006 11 NGO NGO 10 NGO 1 2011 7 ADB AsDF CIDA DDC DFID GDI GDP GIZ HDI IDA IDCJ JICA LGCDP MC/PM MDC NGO ODA SDC SWC UML UNDP UNMIN VDC Asian Development Bank Asian Development Fund
和RIM28三浦氏＿アジア.indd
200711 100 1442 20 2006 WTO 20068,416 2025 1980 108 RIM 2008 Vol.8 No.28 doi moi 1990 19921993 IMF 1995ASEAN NIEs 1990 1997 NIEs 20071 10 ( RIM 2008 Vol.8 No.28 109 JBIC 1996 2005 NIEs World Bank2006 199610
13 2002 8 ERINA 1 2 1 1. 1956 1960 19561960 1960 1970 197174 197579 1980 1980 1990 1980 1984 1980 1986 1990 2 1 199192 1 8 2 2000 9 11 2000 3 3 1 2 3 1 21 2001 2000 10 3 1995 2000 6 2001 2000 6 11 2000
PDF.....p
5 NGO 2006 2010 ODA JICA JBIC AusAid 118 5 VAMSEPII 2004 2007 VAMSEPII 1 NPO 2 3 4 1 NGO 119 1980 ODA 1 ALNAP 1 FASID http://www.fasid. or.jp/chosa/oda/kenkyukai.html 120 5 Active Learning Network for
現行JICAガイドライン－事務局案 比較表.PDF
JICA 1 JICA 1992 17 9.12(b) ODA 1985 OECD JICA 1988 1990 10 JICA JICAJICA 2002 2004 JICA ODA 2 NGO JICA JICA JICA JICA JICA JICA NGO 2002 12 JICA 2003 9 19 2003 9 JICA JICA 2003 11 2003 12 2004 2004 3
中国の貧困削減と制度的障害
1 1978 1978 2000 2.5 3000 30.7% 3% 2003p.4 1980 1990 1 1994 7 20 8000 1 1 2002 1655 5 2004p.142 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 2 Poverty Line 1978 1984 1 200 2003 637 1 1 1 1985 2 1 1 2100 2001 2003p.56 60% Engel s coefficient
NGO ODA ODA Capacity Building NGO ODA NGO ODA NGO ODA 50 ODA NGO NGO ODANGO ODA NGO NGO NGO 1990 UNDP 1950 1980 2 50 1960 1970 1980 ASEAN NGO 2015 MDGs NGOODA JICA / km2 JICA
紀要No.9_006王_CS.indd
1 2 3 4 5 87 9 2009 1937.1 6 1937.1 2 1937.3 1937.9 73 1941.6 77 1941.10 27 1943.9 1943.10 1944.12 1946.12 1947.1 5 1948.4 L 1949.9 10 1950.10 1953.1 1953.12 1956.5.16 1956.6 1966.9 30 1966.10 1967.4 1967.9
(1) %
1 (2008.9.20) 3 (1) 2006 92% 200 200 5 6 2006 2006 2 30 5 2006 1 4 5 3 (3 ) 6000 7000 6000 7000 30 NHK 12.5% 24.1% 4 1 10 4 2006 1 3 2006 2006 (2) (a)90 2006 2006 12 3 90 (1) 3 40 50 30 40 40 50 4 5 30
;;; ;;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;;;; ;;;; ;;;; ;;;;; ;;;; ;;;; ;;;; The World Bank Annual Report World Development
untitled
1 2 (1) (1962) 1972 3 (2) NGO 4 5 6 7 1955 1962 1962 8 1972 MIT 100 9 70 10 ? 11 1/4 3/4 3/4 1/4 5 1 12 1 1 4 FAO 3000 4 1 ODA 1/10 US 1/25 1/2 88 1/7( /WHO ) 12 1980-2000 GDP US 2006 13 Note: North includes
第2章 近代日本の貧困観
30 1867 1970 710 723 NGO 2000:32 17 18 19 2000:67] Food for Work 81695 6 7 10 1999:33] 1783 10 4400 1999:35] 2000:160] 2000:90] 1833 2000:148] 1836 2000:149] 2000:151] 2000:172 81837 [2000:143] 81837
橡ファミリー企業の分析020806
2002 8 6 1 700 OB 2000 700 ( 40 ) 82 5 613 2 700 5,000 2 1,000 700 3 87 4,542 2,533 (82 5 ) 700 OB 405 ( ) 2,500 ( ) (660 40 ) 4 82 5 700 82 5 613 5 30 30 30 30 6 (2001 ) ( ) 1,174 1,023 113 1,136 100
4 5 Y40 706050 70 14 29 C 8 A 2 M 5 E 11 W D 2 60 24 40 C 8 A 3 M 14 E 7 W 3 D 4 Y 50 34 99 C 16 A 15 M 17 E 17 W 12 D 12 Y 6 K 4 11 3 14 21 3 23 22 20 12 17 10 5 15 5 21 3 42 11 8 OB 62 42 104 261
01.12期・井須英次1.doc
Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 21 Forum 21 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum
1.３期・井上健0.doc
Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 Forum 21 10 14 8 6.5 2 37 3 10 30 100 21,002 12 9,401 56 2 11 5 ( ) 231011 22.8 21.016.815.715.214.314.713.310.610.8
government has had difficulties in meeting various donor procedures, and sustained capacity development has not yet been realized. Since its participa
Case Study Efforts and Issues to Improve Aid Coordination and Effectiveness in Cambodia * Yoko KONISHI 1970 NGO OECD/DAC 2006 5 ABSTRACT Cambodia still remains one of the Least Developing Countries (LDCs)
ミレニアム開発目標の現状と課題
hunger G ODA GDP GDP GDP Basic Human Needs GDP...... United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization The World Conference on Education for All a b c d OECD Development Assistance Committee
6.5 5.5 900 1235 915 1250 940 1315 950 1320 1015 1355 1025 1405 1035 1435 1100 1455 1150 1
6.5 5.5 900 1235 915 1250 940 1315 950 1320 1015 1355 1025 1405 1035 1435 1100 1455 1150 1 2 3 * (* ) 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 18701949 () 31870 5 12 71874 10 18401925 131880 3 18381903 441911 11 1,600 241949 1
3 3-1 GDP ,498 12,688 5,780 7,989 6,594 8,391 5,278 7,041 8,100 11,829 7,455 9,075 4,448 6,241 6,220 8,543 5,784 7,210 4,355 6,02
3 3 3-1 3-1-1 851.2 1 9,400 2008 55% 38% 90%75% 15% 1500 1822 1889 1964 1985 3 1988 10 2003 1 2007 1 2 2010 5 81 513 ) 26 1 5,500 1988 6 GDP 5 1988 4 1 6 21.5% 22.5% 9 2 2005 2 3-1 3 3-1 GDP 2003 2006
目次はじめに 第 1 章 世界の工場 から 世界の市場 へ 第 2 章 中国の輸入構造の変化 1 2 第 3 章 ASEAN は中国のどこに何を輸出しているのか 1 ASEAN 2 ASEAN 3 ASEAN 第 4 章 ASEAN 中国 FTA の活用 はじめに 21 GDP 212 GDP GD
中国市場の開拓 確保に ASEAN を活用する 要 旨 調査部 上席主任研究員 大泉啓一郎 3 2 234 2111,619 18.4 11.2 FTA FTA 1 ASEAN ASEAN6 2161 21 1,96 ASEAN6 ASEAN6 ASEANFTA ASEANFTA ACFTA25 212 ACFTA 93.3 91.4 ASEAN ASEAN ASEANASEANFTA ASEAN6
424_カンボジア本文.PDF
2001 12 ACLEDA Association of Cambodian Local ADB Asia Development Bank AusAID Australian Agency for International Development Board CARD Council for Agricultural and Rural Development CARERE Cambodia
1980 ( ) 1985 1980 1981 ( ) 1982 11 1980 1980 1984 1980 pp.19-22 1983 11 96
-- 10 1990 21 1990 1980 2000 95 1980 ( ) 1985 1980 1981 ( ) 1982 11 1980 1980 1984 1980 pp.19-22 1983 11 96 1983 11 11 1984 1984 ( ) 1980 12 1984 CD 1984 1985 97 G 19 pp.109-116 ( ) 1985 22 ( ) 1980 pp.76-77
untitled
ICT ICT 1 ICT 2 ICT 3 ICT 4 ICT 5 ICT 6 ICT 7 ICT 8 ICT 9 ICT 10 ICT 11 ICT 12 ICT 13 ICT 14 ICT 15 ICT 16 ICT 17 ICT 18 ICT 19 ICT 20 ICT 21 ICT 22 ICT 23 ICT 24 ICT 25 ICT 26 ICT 27 ICT 28 ICT 29 ICT
untitled
2007 6 ... 3... 14 1... 14 1... 14... 19... 24... 30... 36... 42 2 . 1 2 HRN (1) HRN ODA OECD DAC 1992 ODA 1 2006 11 30 2 (2007 2 24 ) 3 (2) OECD-DAC 2007 2 3 10 2003 ODA OECD (3) HRN a. 3 Action-Oriented
untitled
Trade and Trade Finance in the 200809 Financial Crisis, IMF Working Paper WP/11/16., Understanding the Great Trade Collapse of 200809 and the Subsequent Trade Recovery, Economic Perspectives, 2Q/2011.
untitled
-1- 12 3 7 8 3.5 ( ) 7 8 3 1 2 3 ( ) ( -2- 3 7 5 21 2 2-3- 2 2 18 ( 1) ( 1) ( ) 6. 9 ( 9 15 ) 7. 2 ( 9 ) ( 11 32 11 ) 11. 4 20. 10 ( 26 15 21 ) 23. 9 28. 4 ( 8 ) ( 34 ) 32. 9 ( 45 ) 32. 12 ( 10 13 ) 33.
18 () 2,000 4,300 1,200 3,900 2,000 4,000 2,200 6,000 1,600 4,100 1,400 3,900 1,800 4,200 3,400 4,100 1,600 4,000 1,600 9,400 1,800 6,400 1,200 4,100 2,000 5,400 1,800 3,900 1,800 4,000 1,800 5,400 2,500
untitled
[ 研究ノート ] 4% 19 19 20 1997a 20 Mitchell, 2002: 123 208 1997b; 2008 2 1960 1980 Abdel-Fadil, 1975; Hansen, 1969; Radwan & Lee, 1986 Abdel-Fadil, 1980; 85 Assaad, 1997 2 Hopkins Hopkins & Westergaard, 1998:
第一次大戦後の日本における国債流通市場の制度改革
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 2009-J-23 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 103-8660 2-1-1 http://www.imes.boj.or.jp IMES Discussion Paper Series 2009-J-23 2009