aragciv54mac.dvi

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "aragciv54mac.dvi"

Transcription

1 ( 4 ) Modigliani-Miller(1963) IRR ( ) NPV IRR NPV IRR NPV IRR 100 EBIT 20 20% τ (1 τ) 20% CC tax = S V ρ S + B V (1 τ)ρ B (1) S B V ρ S CAPM 1

2 ρ B *1 (1) MM *2 ( ) MM MM ( ) MM (1 τ) 20% (1) CC tax CC tax CC tax 1 CC tax *1 Brealey-Myers-Allen(2011) Ross-Westerfield-Jaffe(2011) *2 Modigliani-Miller(1958) Modigliani-Miller(1963) Modigliani-Miller(1963) MM MM Arditti-evy(1977) Ben-Horim(1979) Boudreaux-ong(1979) evy-sarnat(1990) 2

3 CC tax 2 CC tax 2 * *3 Myers(1984) Myers-Majluf(1984) ( ) ShyamSunder-Myers(1999) Fama-French(2002) Frank-Goyal(2003) 3

4 ( ) 2 Hayashi(1982) Dixit-Pindyck(1994) Bolton-Chen-Wang(2011) eland(1998) Morellec(2004) 1 Giat-Hackman-Subramanian(2010) DeMarzo-Fishman-He-Wang(2012) Hackbarth-Mauer(2012)

5 2 2.1 * EBIT S B S B V V senior debt EBIT EBIT µ σ Φ(µ,σ ) *5 K K= kv ( ) τ 1 V V ( B) B V + B τ[ V ( B)] V + B Q S τ( V [ B]) Q S = 0 (> ) ( V + B ) (V + B> ) Q S V + B (2) *4 Tsuji(2012) *5 N(µ,σ 2 ) 5

6 3 S > 0 V B( S )>0 V + B (2) 1 ( ) 2 3 Q B Q B K >K Q (>K) B = ( ) K (> K ) 0 (K> ) >K 1 2 K 3 K Q (K ) ( ) B = (4) 0 (> ) 2 S B CAPM 1 S B [ E( Q (>K) B B= [ E( Q (K ) B S = E( Q S ) λ cov( R M, Q S ) (5) 1+R F ]/ ) λ cov( R M, Q (>K) (1+R F ) (>K ) B ) ) λ cov( R M, Q (K ) B ) ]/ (1+R F ) (K ) R F R M (3) (6) λ= E( R M ) R F σ( R M ) 2 (5) (6) partial moment f ( ) Φ(µ,σ ) 6

7 F( ) E( Q S )=µ [1 τ+τf(v + B) F()]+σ 2 [ f () τ f (V + B)] [1 F()]+τ(V + B)[1 F(V + B)] cov( R M, Q S )=cov( R M, )[1 τ+τf(v + B) F()] E( Q (>K) B )=[1 F()] K[F() F(K)] +µ [F() F(K)] σ 2 [ f () f (K)] cov( R M, Q (>K) B )=cov( R M, )[F() F(K)+ K f ()] E( Q (K ) B )=[1 F()] cov( R M, Q (K ) B )=cov( R M, ) f () 2.2 CAPM ( ) eland(1998) Morellec(2004) CAPM ( ) µ σ cov( R M, ) Q S Q B ( ) (2) (3) ( (4) ) (5) (6) (5) (6) S B µ σ k λ R F cov( R M, ) τ µ σ 3 *6 3 *6 k cov( R M, ) 7

8 S = S (,µ,σ ) B= B(,µ,σ ) V = V (,µ,σ )=S (,µ,σ )+ B(,µ,σ ) µ σ µ σ µ σ µ σ µ σ µ σ *7 µ σ 2 EBIT EBIT EBIT EBIT EBIT ω EBIT ( ) ( ) µ *7 Hart(1995) 8

9 ω µ ω µ 1 µ =ω α α>0 (7) α 1 µ ω α *8 = arg max V (,µ,σ ) (8) ( ) σ S σ = arg max σ S (,µ,σ ) (9) (7) (8) (9) 3 µ σ µ σ µ =ω α (10) V (,µ,σ )=0 (11) S (,µ σ,σ )=0 (12) µ σ ω α 2 S B *8 Jensen-Meckling(1976) Myers(1977) EBIT Tsuji(2012) Appendix ((7) EBIT (7) 1 2 9

10 ω α S = S (ω,α;,µ,σ ) B= B(ω,α;,µ,σ ) V = V (ω,α;,µ,σ ) EBIT 1 ω ( ) 10 EBIT 50 1 α 0.2 k 0.4 τ E( R M )=0.11 σ( R M )=0.18 R F =0.06 corr( R M, ) 0.2 E( R M ) 11% (1.11) E( R M )= λ µ =47.41 σ =23.66 =12.93 (10) (11) (12) 3 S B V DR B/V ROA R ROA = ω V V (13) ω (50.0) (10 ) ROA R ROA 1 * % *9 ROA (13) R ROA (1+R ROA )

11 1 ω α k τ E( R M ) σ( R M ) R F λ corr( R M, ) µ σ S B V DR ROA ( )E( R M ) σ( R M ) R F 1 1 λ 1 10 ω µ σ 1 10 DR B/V ROA ( ) (13) R ROA 1 2 ω ω µ σ S B V DR ROA ( )ω ω ω µ σ S B V 1.2 DB ROA 1 (10) ω µ

12 1 *10 I I I B I S I= I S + I B I I I S I B (0) α (0) µ (0) σ (0) V ( ω (0) ( S ω (0) σ µ (0) =,α ; (0),µ (0) α (0) (10),α ; (0),µ (0),σ (0),σ (0) ) = 0 (11) ) = 0 (12) Φ ( ) µ (0),σ (0) (0) S (0) B(0) S (0) = S ( ω (0),α ; (0),µ (0) B (0) = B (,α ; (0),µ (0),σ (0),σ (0) ) ) *

13 Φ ( ) µ (1), (1) S (1) B(1) (1) µ (1) (1) σ S ( ) = arg max S (1),µ (1) σ,σ (10) (14) µ (1) µ (1) = α (1) (15) α α (1) *11 B(1) S (1) S (1) = S ( ω (1),α ; (1),µ (1) B (1) = B (,α ; (1),µ (1),, I I B ) (1 (0) B (1) = I B (16) (1) I B (1) ( ) (1) B (1) 1 (0) ( ) (1) (0) I (1) B 1 (0) B (1) (1) I B I B (0) B (1) B (0) (1) ) ) *11 (15) α α α ( ) 13

14 I S 1 S P(0) 1 P (1) n (0) S S (0) = n(0) S S S n(1) S S I S /P (1) S S (1) S (1) = n(1) S P(1) S = n(0) S + I S P(1) S P (1) S P (1) P (0) = S (0) + I S+ n (0) S (P(1) S P (0) S ) (17) I S S (1) ( 3 ) P (1) S (17) P (1) S P (0) S S (1) S (0) + I S P (1) S = P (0) S ( ) S (1) = S (0) + I S ( = arg max S ω (1) σ,α ; ) (1),µ (1),σ (14) (1 (0) (1) ( S ω (1),α ; (1),µ (1) µ (1) = ) B (,α ; (1),µ (1), S (0) P (0) S α (1) (15) ) S ( ω (0),,α ; (0),µ (0) ) = IB (16) ),σ (0) = IS (18) (14) σ (15) (16) (18) (16) (18) 4 (0) I S I B µ (1) µ (1) 4 (1) (14) (15) 14

15 (16) (18) 2 (1) µ (1) (1) R q ω(1) ω(0) I I (1 ) (I B I S ) I I B I S R q I B R q R q R q (I B ) R q (19) min R q 0 I B I I S = I I B (20) I B I B R q ROA (19) R q 1 (13) R ROA 2 1 S (1) S (0) = I S I S = S (0) I B B (1) S (0)= B (1) 15

16 I B (1) B (0) = I B (16) (0) (1) B(1) = B (0) (21) (21) 1 I B B (0) (21) B (0) 1 ω c c = cω(0) = cσ (0) = ω(1) σ (0) (22) 2 I( ) B (0) /V (0) I B /I I B I S I B I S B (,α ; (1),µ (1) ( S ω (1),α ; (1),µ (1) = ω(1) σ (0) (22) µ (1) = α (1) (15) ) (, B ω (0),α ; ) (0),µ (0),σ (0) = IB (23), ) S ( ω (0),α ; (0),µ (0),σ (0) ) = IS (18) (18) (15) (23) (22) (23) 16

17 3 µ (0) σ (0) (0) S (0) B (0) V (0) DR ROA µ (1) (1) S (1) B (1) V (1) I B I B /I RRI ( )ω µ σ 1 10 (0) (1) DR B/V ROA ( ) (13) R ROA 1 RRI ( ) (19) R q 1 (22) 4 µ (1) (1) 4 ω(0) (19) I= 2 3 I= I B I S B (0) ) B(1) ) (S (1) (S (0) I S I B (1) =14.46 µ (1) = I=2 =50 ω(1) =55.91 R q % ( 3 RRI ) RRI R q 1 RRI ROA B (0) /V (0) I I B I S 1 I=2 I B 0 2 ( I S = I I B ) ((22) (15) (23) (18) 4 ) R q R q R q R q R q 1 R q I B I S B (0) S (0) 17

18 RRI I B 1 (I B ) ( ) I B I S R q ( ) (I B ) R q I B I I B 1 I I B R q I B 1 I I B R q I B 3.3 R q R q I B I S R q (20) 4 I B = 2 I= 2 R q 18

19 0.119 RRI I B 2 (I B ) ( ) 4 ( ) µ (0) σ (0) (0) S (0) B (0) V (0) DR ROA µ (1) (1) S (1) B (1) V (1) I B RRI ( ) 3 I B 0 2 R q 2 I B R q ( B (1) 8.28 I B 2 ) 1 S (0) σ (1) S (1) σ (1) σ (0) = 0 [σ,σ ] S (1) 19

20 σ σ = ω(1) σ σ (0) 1.3 σ (0) ω σ σ 30% 4 σ σ 4 1 R ROA R q R q R ROA σ (0) 20

21 4 I α k τ λ corr( R M, ) I B /I 1.0 ( ) B (0) OldB OldB OldB B (0) DR (0) DR (1) 1 [σ,σ ] σ ω(0) σ (0) RRI ROA 5 ( (0) ) 2 DR(0) ROA RRI 6 50 I RRI 5 7 α α DR (0) α=0.16 α= % 20% 7 α RRI 8 9 k ( 8) τ ( 9) 21

22 k τ DR (0) k τ RRI k RRI 8 9 τ RRI λ 11 corr( R M, ) λ corr( R M, λ corr( R M, ) RRI λ corr( R M, ) 1 (1) RRI 5 11 CC tax RRI tax *12 10% 15% 5 CC tax RRI tax CC tax 2 α (0) µ (0) σ (0) α 1 ( ) α (0) µ (0) σ (0) *12 RRI tax = (1 τ)rri 10 1 CC tax RRI tax 22

23 µ (0) µ (1) 5 σ (0) (0) S (0) B (0) V (0) DR (0) ROA CC tax (1) B (1) DR (1) OldB I B /I RRI RRI tax ( ) DR (0) DR (1) B (0) /V (0) B(1) /V (1) ROA (13) R ROA RRI (19) R q 1 CC tax (1) OldB B (1) I B I B /I 1.0 RRI tax (1 τ)rri α=0.2 k=0.4 τ=0.45 I=2.0 λ=3.24 corr( R M, )=0.2 I µ (0) µ (1) 6 I σ (0) (0) S (0) B (0) V (0) DR (0) ROA CC tax (1) B (1) DR (1) OldB I B /I RRI RRI tax ( ) α=0.2 k=0.4 τ=0.45 λ=3.24 corr( R M, )=0.2 5 α µ (0) µ (1) 7 α σ (0) (0) S (0) B (0) V (0) DR (0) ROA CC tax (1) B (1) DR (1) OldB I B /I RRI RRI tax ( ) k=0.4 τ=0.45 I=2 λ=3.24 corr( R M, )=

24 k µ (0) µ (1) 8 k σ (0) (0) S (0) B (0) V (0) DR (0) ROA CC tax (1) B (1) DR (1) OldB I B /I RRI RRI tax ( ) α=0.2 τ=0.45 I=2 λ=3.24 corr( R M, )=0.2 5 τ µ (0) µ (1) 9 τ σ (0) (0) S (0) B (0) V (0) DR (0) ROA CC tax (1) B (1) DR (1) OldB I B /I RRI RRI tax ( ) α=0.2 k=0.4 I=2 λ=3.24 corr( R M, )=0.2 5 λ µ (0) µ (1) 10 λ σ (0) (0) S (0) B (0) V (0) DR (0) ROA CC tax (1) B (1) DR (1) OldB I B /I RRI RRI tax ( ) α=0.2 k=0.4 τ=0.45 I=2 corr( R M, )=

25 corr( R M, ) µ (0) µ (1) 11 corr( R M, ) σ (0) (0) S (0) B (0) V (0) DR (0) ROA CC tax (1) B (1) DR (1) OldB I B /I RRI RRI tax ( ) α=0.2 k=0.4 τ=0.45 I=2 λ= I 15% [1](period[1]) [2](period[2]) 10 1 S (0) B(0) E( R M ) σ( R M ) R F λ 1 10 corr( R M, ) k τ k=0.3 τ [1] 515 [2] 592 α ( ) 3.1 [1] 442 [2] 576 ( =σ ) [1] 284 [2] 572 σ [2] [1] 3 [1] 3 [2] σ [1] 253 [2]

26 12 period[1] period[2] 1 (A) (B) (B)/(A) 91.5% 97.6% (C) (C)/(B) 93.8% 99.7% ( ) period[1] ( [1]) period[2] ( [2]) α σ (0) (0) µ (0) 3.1 [1] 1 31 [2] σ σ σ σ 13 RRI tax CC tax *13 CC tax RRI tax (s.d.) CC tax RRI tax 2 CC tax RRI tax di f f di f f CC tax RRI tax di f f [1] [2] [1] 0.78% [2] 18.54% [1] di f f 130 [2] di f f 6 CC tax RRI tax [1] [2] CC tax 13 RRI tax CC tax 3 t-test *13 4 CC tax 5 CC tax CC tax 26

27 13 CC tax RRI tax CC tax RRI tax di f f period[1] period[2] period[1] period[2] period[1] period[2] mean s.d min max difference: test statistics correlation firms di f f > 0 t-test di f f - Wilcoxon Pearson Spearman Kendall period[1] period[2] ( ) RRI tax CC tax di f f di f f = (CC tax RRI tax )/RRI tax t-test RRI tax CC tax t diff- f f = 0 Wilcoxon Pearson Spearman Kendall 5% 1% t- di f f - di f f - 3 Wilcoxon [1] RRI tax CC tax [2] 1% RRI tax CC tax 13 3 (Pearson) [1] [2] Spearman Kendall 3 [2] [1] 3 2 1% 14 [1] [2] RRI tax CC tax RRI tax [1] [2] RRI tax CC tax % RRI tax CC tax 27

28 14 CC tax RRI tax total 278 same movement 183 (percentage) (65.8%) ( ) total RRI tax [1] [2] RRI tax same movement CC tax ( ) 1% 18% CC tax RRI tax 6 MM

29 1 (7) (15) α [1] Arditti, F. D., and H. evy The Weighted Average Cost of Capital as a Cutoff rate: A Critical Analysis of the Classical Textbook Weighted Average. Financial Management 6: [2] Ben-Horim, M Comment on The Weighted Average Cost of Capital as a Cutoff Rate. Financial Management 8: [3] Bolton, Patrick, Hui Chen, and Neng Wang A Unified Theory of Tobin s Q, Corporate Investment, Financing, and Risk Management. Journal of Finance, Vol.66, No.5 (October, 2011), pp [4] Boudreaux, K. J., and H. W. ong The Weighted Average Cost of Capital as a Cutoff Rate: A Further Analysis. Financial Management 8: [5] Brealey, R. A., S. C. Myers, and F. Allen Principles of Corporate Finance(tenth edition). McGraw-Hill/Irwin. [6] DeMarzo, Peter M., Michael J. Fishman, higuo He, and Neng Wang, Dynamic Agency and the q Theory of Investment, Journal of Finance Vol.67, No.6 (December, 2012), pp [7] Dixit, A. K., and R. S. Pindyck Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press. [8] Fama, Eugene F., and Kenneth R. French, Testing Trade-Off and Pecking Order Predictions about Dividends and Debt, Review of Financial Studies, Vol.15, No.1 (Spring, 2002), pp [9] Frank, M.., and V. K. Goyal, Testing the Pecking Order Theory of Capital Structure, Journal of Financial Economics Vol.67, No.2 (February, 2003), pp [10] Giat, Yahel, Steve T. Hackman, and Ajay Subramanian, Investment under Uncertainty, Heterogeneous Beliefs, and Agency Conflicts, Review of Financial Studies Vol.23, No.4 (April, 2010), pp [11] Hart, O Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure. Oxford University Press. [12] Hackbarth, Dirk, and David C. Mauer, Optimal Priority Structure, Capital Structure, and 29

30 Investment, Review of Financial Studies, Vol.25, No.3 (March, 2012), pp [13] Hayashi, Fumio Tobin s Marginal q and Average q: A Neoclassical Interpretation, Econometrica, Vol.50, No.1 (January, 1982), pp [14] Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: [15] eland, H. E Agency Costs, Risk Management, and Capital Structure. Journal of Finance 53: [16] evy H., and M. Sarnat Capital Investment and Financial Decisions(fourth edition). Prentice Hall. [17] Morellec, E Can Managerial Discretion Explain Observed everage Ratios? Review of Financial Studies 17: [18] Modigliani, F., and M. H. Miller The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment. American Economic Review 48: [19] Modigliani, F., and M. H. Miller Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction. American Economic Review 53: [20] Myers, S. C Determinants of Corporate Borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics 5: [21] Myers, S. C The Capital Structure Puzzle. Journal of Finance 39: [22] Myers, S. C., and N. S. Majluf Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information that Investors Do Not Have. Journal of Financial Economics 13: [23] Ross, S. A., R. W. Westerfield, and J. Jaffe Corporate Finance(ninth edition). McGraw- Hill/Irwin. [24] Shyam-Sunder, akshmi, and Stewart C. Myers Testing Static Tradeoff against Pecking Order Models of Capital Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.51, No.2 (February, 1999), pp [25] Tsuji, Y Measuring the Agency Costs of Debt: A Simplified Approach. Journal of Business, Economics and Finance 1:

戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成:最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務

戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成:最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務 1930 Modigliani and Miller [1958] 170 1930 2008 7 16 I E-mail: takashi.nanjou@boj.or.jp E-mail: cc00881@srv.cc.hit-u.ac.jp //2009.7 81 1. 1 2 M&A 3 4 1965 1969 1995 1995 1993 1 2008 2008 1985 2006 10 ROA

More information

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題 * takeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** kawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp *** naohiko.baba@boj.or.jp No.05-J-3 2005 3 103-8660 30 No.05-J-3 2005 3 1990 * E-mailtakeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** E-mailkawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp

More information

p *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2

p *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2 2013 1 nabe@ier.hit-u.ac.jp 2013 4 11 Jorgenson Tobin q : Hayashi s Theorem : Jordan : 1 investment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 *1 *1 93SNA 1 p.180 1936 100 1970 *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian

More information

わが国企業による株主還元策の決定要因:配当・自社株消却のインセンティブを巡る実証分析

わが国企業による株主還元策の決定要因:配当・自社株消却のインセンティブを巡る実証分析 * youichi.ueno@boj.or.jp ** naohiko.baba@boj.or.jp No.05-J-6 2005 4 103-8660 30 No.05-J-6 2005 4 * ** 1990 1 2 1990 * E-mailyouichi.ueno@boj.or.jp ** E-mailnaohiko.baba@boj.or.jp 1 1990 1 1990 1 [2004]

More information

Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C

Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C 27 nabe@ier.hit-u.ac.jp 27 4 3 Jorgenson Tobin q : Hayashi s Theorem Jordan Saddle Path. GDP % GDP 2. 3. 4.. Tobin q 2 2. Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F

More information

Y-...W

Y-...W 259 21 1 1 2003 2 1 2 1 15 22 260 56 3 2 2. 1 2. 2 2. 3 2. 4 3 3. 1 3. 2 4 2 2. 1 1965 1999 2 Brick, Frierman, and Kim 1998 Choate 1997Fischer, Heinkel, and Zechner 1989 Gilson 1997 Mauer and Triantis

More information

2_赤羽.indd

2_赤羽.indd Vol. 56, No. 1 2, April 2010 TFT-LCD AUO TFT-LCD Thin Film Transistor Liquid Crystal Display: 1990 TFT-LCD TFT-LCD 2003; 2004; 2004; 2006 TFT-LCD 2008; 2008 1) TFT-LCD TFT-LCD 2004, 2006 TFT-LCD 1 TFT-LCD

More information

PFI

PFI PFI 23 3 3 PFI PFI 1 1 2 3 2.1................................. 3 2.2..................... 4 2.3.......................... 5 3 7 3.1................................ 7 3.2.................................

More information

Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) ,

Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) , ,, 2010 8 24 2010 9 14 A B C A (B Negishi(1960) (C) ( 22 3 27 ) E-mail:fujii@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:082e527e@stu.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:iritani@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp 1 1 1 2 3 Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987)

More information

(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008)

(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008) ,, 23 4 30 (i) (ii) (i) (ii) Negishi (1960) 2010 (2010) ( ) ( ) (2010) E-mail:fujii@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:082e527e@stu.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:iritani@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp 1 1 16 (2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987)

More information

headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart s

headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart s CJEB The financial strategies of Japanese multinational enterprises and internal capital market, Columbia Business School, CJEB, Working Paper No., April,. headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart

More information

1 CAPM: I-,,, I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- ( CAPM) I- CAPM I- 1 I- Jensen Fama-French 3 I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 1 Fama-Fr

1 CAPM: I-,,, I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- ( CAPM) I- CAPM I- 1 I- Jensen Fama-French 3 I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 1 Fama-Fr 1 CAPM: I-,,, I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- ( CAPM) I- CAPM I- 1 I- Jensen Fama-French 3 I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 1 Fama-French (FF) 3 [5] (Capital Asset Pricing Model; CAPM

More information

repocost.PDF

repocost.PDF 178 2 10 8 39-52 (tax planning) [Scholes and Wolfson,1992] (tax cost saving hypothesis) (accounting choice) (economic consequences) (financial reporting costs) (1) (financial reporting cost hypothesis)

More information

I- Fama-French 3, Idiosyncratic (I- ) I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- 1 I- I- Jensen Fama-French 3 SMB-FL, HML-FL I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth Fama-MacBeth I- S

I- Fama-French 3, Idiosyncratic (I- ) I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- 1 I- I- Jensen Fama-French 3 SMB-FL, HML-FL I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth Fama-MacBeth I- S I- Fama-French 3, Idiosyncratic (I- ) I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- 1 I- I- Jensen Fama-French 3 SMB-FL, HML-FL I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 2, 3, 5 I- HML-FL 1 Fama-French

More information

<96D889BA904D2E696E6464>

<96D889BA904D2E696E6464> 615 379 1 1995 10 OECD 1995 380 616 57 3 1993 4 3071 2003 1 3247 10 10 4 1 1990 2000 2003 10 617 381 2002 2 3 4 5 2 1 1990 1995 1995 12 1995 IPP Independent Power Producer 1 2004a, b 2005a, b 382 618 57

More information

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─ q E-mail: kenji.nishizaki@boj.or.jp E-mail: kurasawa@ynu.ac.jp OECD Vives Tirole Shleifer and Vishny q %% %% % % Allen and Gale %% % Admati, Pfreiderer and Zechner Burkart, Gromb and Panunzi Cremer 1995Pagno

More information

L Y L( ) Y0.15Y 0.03L 0.01L 6% L=(10.15)Y 108.5Y 6%1 Y y p L ( 19 ) [1990] [1988] 1

L Y L( ) Y0.15Y 0.03L 0.01L 6% L=(10.15)Y 108.5Y 6%1 Y y p L ( 19 ) [1990] [1988] 1 1. 1-1 00 001 9 J-REIT 1- MM CAPM 1-3 [001] [1997] [003] [001] [1999] [003] 1-4 0 . -1 18 1-1873 6 1896 L Y L( ) Y0.15Y 0.03L 0.01L 6% L=(10.15)Y 108.5Y 6%1 Y y p L 6 1986 ( 19 ) -3 17 3 18 44 1 [1990]

More information

商学 63‐3☆/6.山本

商学 63‐3☆/6.山本 193 W. A. 1 2 3 1 2 WTO FTA TPP D. P. P. W. A. 194 2 3 Lewis 1954 1982, 1987 1999 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 A B 1987 119 1985 Krugman and Obstfeld 2009 19742006 3 W. A. 195 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 A a1 a2 * * i ai i 1, 2

More information

paper01.PDF

paper01.PDF (1) (1) (2) (2) (3) (3) (4) * () (1996 12 1 2 3 [1994] B S B=S W D L (a) (b) B B=S = ( ) S D D Modigliani=Miller Ross and Westerfield [1988] Sharpe [1976] Treynor [1977] (a) V F F (b) F (c) (d) V F 4 L

More information

IFRS Business Model IASB 2010b, Purpose and status, a and b IASB IFRS IFRS IFRS IASB IFRS IFRS Principles-Based Standard Tweedie 2007 Tweedie 2007, p.

IFRS Business Model IASB 2010b, Purpose and status, a and b IASB IFRS IFRS IFRS IASB IFRS IFRS Principles-Based Standard Tweedie 2007 Tweedie 2007, p. International Accounting Standards Board: IASB IASB 2010b IASB International Financial Reporting Standards: IFRS IFRS IFRS Tweedie 2007, p. 7 consistency AAAFASC 2011, p. 20 IFRS Business Model IASB 2010b,

More information

23_02.dvi

23_02.dvi Vol. 2 No. 2 10 21 (Mar. 2009) 1 1 1 Effect of Overconfidencial Investor to Stock Market Behaviour Ryota Inaishi, 1 Fei Zhai 1 and Eisuke Kita 1 Recently, the behavioral finance theory has been interested

More information

導入

導入 CIRJE-J-120 2004 10 CIRJE http://www.e.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cirje/research/03research02dp_j.html ** *** ** okazaki@e.u-tokyo.ac.jp *** masaki@econ.osaka-u.ac.jp - 1 - History of Production Organizations Abstract

More information

Keynes 1936 Tobin 1 Hicks 1937 Keynes IS LM 2 IS LM 3 IS LM Keynes Keynes animal spirits

Keynes 1936 Tobin 1 Hicks 1937 Keynes IS LM 2 IS LM 3 IS LM Keynes Keynes animal spirits 43 2000 17 28 Masahiro NAKANO 2.1 Keynes 2.2 3.1 3.2 43 2000 Keynes 1936 Tobin 1 Hicks 1937 Keynes IS LM 2 IS LM 3 IS LM Keynes Keynes animal spirits Keynes IS LM 1990 Keynes 1980 90 2 1 43 2000 Keynes

More information

BIS CDO CDO CDO CDO Cifuentes and O Connor[1] Finger[6] Li[8] Duffie and Garleânu[4] CDO Merton[9] CDO 1 CDO CDO CDS CDO three jump model Longstaff an

BIS CDO CDO CDO CDO Cifuentes and O Connor[1] Finger[6] Li[8] Duffie and Garleânu[4] CDO Merton[9] CDO 1 CDO CDO CDS CDO three jump model Longstaff an CDO 2010 5 18 CDO(Collateralized Debt Obligation) Duffie and Garleânu[4] CDO CDS(Credit Default Swap) Duffie and Garleânu[4] 4 CDO CDS CDO CDS CDO 2007 CDO CDO CDS 1 1.1 2007 2008 9 15 ( ) CDO CDO 80 E-mail:taiji.ohka@gmail.com

More information

Title Author(s) Kobe University Repository : Kernel 流 動 性 危 機 : レパレッジとモニタリング (< 特 集 > 世 界 金 融 危 機 )(Liquidity Crisis : Leverage and Monitoring ( World Financial Crisis)) 丸 茂, 俊 彦 Citation 国 民 経 済 雑 誌,203(1):107-119

More information

4402ALL-“Å‘I

4402ALL-“Å‘I 44220077 1 2 ESO 3 3-1 3-2 1 3-3 3-4 4 Appendix 1 Appendix 2 ESO Appendix 3 3 1 Appendix E-mail suzudai555@hotmail.com 1 Employee Stock Options: ESO ESO ESO ESO ESO ESO ESO ESO ESO 2006b ESOESO ESO ESO

More information

6) 7) MBO management buy-out 2 necessity sufficiency ) 21

6) 7) MBO management buy-out 2 necessity sufficiency ) 21 1) 1997 15 02 03 751 1998 8 9 04 1996 16.1% 17.5% 26.9% 64.9% 63.3% 48.9% 2) 02 54.8% 59.0% 61.8% 78.6% 46.5% 1996 17.8% 19.9% 18.7% 42% 11.9% 3) 4) 01 3 1 3 2 03 04 1 TCL 5) Vol. 52, No. 4, October 06

More information

Vol.8 No (July 2015) 2/ [3] stratification / *1 2 J-REIT *2 *1 *2 J-REIT % J-REIT J-REIT 6 J-REIT J-REIT 10 J-REIT *3 J-

Vol.8 No (July 2015) 2/ [3] stratification / *1 2 J-REIT *2 *1 *2 J-REIT % J-REIT J-REIT 6 J-REIT J-REIT 10 J-REIT *3 J- Vol.8 No.2 1 9 (July 2015) 1,a) 2 3 2012 1 5 2012 3 24, 2013 12 12 2 1 2 A Factor Model for Measuring Market Risk in Real Estate Investment Hiroshi Ishijima 1,a) Akira Maeda 2 Tomohiko Taniyama 3 Received:

More information

取引銀行の破綻が企業経営に及ぼす影響について-阪和銀行破綻の事例分析-

取引銀行の破綻が企業経営に及ぼす影響について-阪和銀行破綻の事例分析- 2 JEL Classification: G21, G14 Key words: e-mail y-murakami@aria.ocn.ne.jp 1 The Effect of Bank Failure on Client Firms A Study on the Hanwa Bank s Failure By Yoshiko Murakami Abstract The financial theories

More information

[17]Holmström and Tirole (2000) (1) (2) (1) (2) 1 1 2

[17]Holmström and Tirole (2000) (1) (2) (1) (2) 1 1 2 2002 4 1 1990 1 525-8577 1-1-1. Tel.: 077-561-4855. Fax.: 077-561-3964. E-mail: khori@ec.ritsumei.ac.jp 1 [17]Holmström and Tirole (2000) (1) (2) (1) (2) 1 1 2 MM MM MM MM CP 0 3 1 1990 1970 2 2 1 1 17%

More information

shuron.dvi

shuron.dvi 01M3065 1 4 1.1........................... 4 1.2........................ 5 1.3........................ 6 2 8 2.1.......................... 8 2.2....................... 9 3 13 3.1.............................

More information

2015 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1

2015 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1 2015 : 27 6 13 1 (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1947) 2 Samuelson(1958) 3 OLG Solow Ramsey Samuelson

More information

カルマンフィルターによるベータ推定( )

カルマンフィルターによるベータ推定( ) β TOPIX 1 22 β β smoothness priors (the Capital Asset Pricing Model, CAPM) CAPM 1 β β β β smoothness priors :,,. E-mail: koiti@ism.ac.jp., 104 1 TOPIX β Z i = β i Z m + α i (1) Z i Z m α i α i β i (the

More information

130 Oct Radial Basis Function RBF Efficient Market Hypothesis Fama ) 4) 1 Fig. 1 Utility function. 2 Fig. 2 Value function. (1) (2)

130 Oct Radial Basis Function RBF Efficient Market Hypothesis Fama ) 4) 1 Fig. 1 Utility function. 2 Fig. 2 Value function. (1) (2) Vol. 47 No. SIG 14(TOM 15) Oct. 2006 RBF 2 Effect of Stock Investor Agent According to Framing Effect to Stock Exchange in Artificial Stock Market Zhai Fei, Shen Kan, Yusuke Namikawa and Eisuke Kita Several

More information

082_rev2_utf8.pdf

082_rev2_utf8.pdf 3 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1 3 3 3 2008 3 2008 2008 3 2008 2008, 1 5 Lo and MacKinlay (1990a) de Jong and Nijman (1997) Cohen et al. (1983) Lo and MacKinlay (1990a b) Cohen et al. (1983) de Jong and Nijman (1997)

More information

2017 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 exante (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Al

2017 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 exante (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Al 2017 : 29 5 24 1 (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 exante (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1947) 2 Samuelson(1958) 3 OLG Solow Ramsey 1

More information

⑤香取 徹.indd

⑤香取 徹.indd 77 割引現在価値モデルの理論と有効性 Theory and Efficiency of Discounted Present Value Model Toru Katori FCF EVA FCF EVA RI 1 はじめに 1980 Free Cash Flow: FCF Copeland et. Al 19901990 Economic Value Added: EVA Stewart 1991

More information

autocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] (A)

autocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] (A) Discussion Paper Series A No.425 2002 2 186-8603 iwaisako@ier.hit-u.ac.jp 14 1 24 autocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] 1990 12 13 (A) 12370027 13 1 1980 Lo/MacKinlay [1988]

More information

12056286_03.indd

12056286_03.indd : 82 1 2013 7 2010 2011 1 30 2010 30 2011 30 2010 9 10 11 2011 1 2 1 2010 9 UK UK UK UK UK p. 843 45 82 1 1 UK 9 9 2007-08 UK 30% 30 20%30 150 30 32.5% 2030% p. 843 3 2004-05 5% 5% 75% p. 843 2010 11 1963

More information

Page

Page Page Page 1 3 4 M&A DCF NPV 1-1 BIS 1-3 1-2 5 6 1-3 2 2 0 200 010 2-1 A B B A B 7 8 Coffee Break CAPM Capital Asset Pricing model 3 IRR NPV EVA BS PL 9 2 ROA 3-1 EBIT Earnings Before Interest,Taxes) 3-2

More information

通し組/01.論説:史洪偉・張星源

通し組/01.論説:史洪偉・張星源 Modigliani and Miller MM MM MM MM! " Modigliani and Miller MM! WTO Schwarts and Aronson Aggarwal Bowen !! Booth GDP Booth GDP GDP GDP "! Myers Bankruptcy Cost Model Ross Signaling Model Fama and Jensen

More information

untitled

untitled P-VAR IT 1 Porter, 19851990 2 Hammer and Champy, 1993 3 1 2 Slywotzky, 1997 Porter1985 Hamel and Prahalad, 1994 Christensen2003 2000 Fine1998 4 5 2003 3 6 7, 2001, p.8 4 8 9 Boulding, 1956 5 10 IT e-words

More information

ベンチャー・キャピタル投資契約の

ベンチャー・キャピタル投資契約の 2005 8 23 B B IPO 1 VC VB VC 2 VC VB...2... 2 VC VB... 3... 5...7... 7... 8... 9...10... 12... 15... 17 VC 18 VC /...18...21 27...27 VC... 27 VB... 28...28 1... 28 2... 29 3... 29 4... 29 5... 30 6...

More information

R(t)=1-f Qb(x-x(wt))P(w)dw 1forvbuxz0 0forbjv5rx<0

R(t)=1-f Qb(x-x(wt))P(w)dw 1forvbuxz0 0forbjv5rx<0 E-mail: kkoba@psa2. kuciv. kyoto-u. ac. jp E-mail: tueda@plan. cv. titech. ac. jp Key Words : infrastructure management, maintenance/replacement, stochastic control, accounting, mechanism design R(t)=1-f

More information

所得税と課税最低限に関する一考察

所得税と課税最低限に関する一考察 1. 2. 2.1 2.2 2.2.1 2.2.2 3. 3.1 3.2 3.3 4. 4.1 4.2 5. 1 1. 1 14 2 1985 3 1981 4 1997 5 2005 325 6 1 2005 19942000 2 http://www.mof.go.jp/singikai/zeicho/tosin/140614c.htm 3 1985p.107 4 1981p.122 5 1997p.232

More information

<8DEC90AC97702E657073>

<8DEC90AC97702E657073> 2008-45 株価乗数モデルに基づく企業価値評価 : サーベイ 音川和久 (Price-to-Earnings Ratio: PER) 1 (Price-to-Book Ratio: PBR) (DDM) (DCFM) (RIM) Palepu, Healy and Bernard (2004) 19203024 1-1 - Koller, Goedhart and Wessels, 2005;

More information

濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G

濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G 濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G34 950-2181 2 8050 Tel. and fax: 025-262-6538 E-mail: khamada@econ.niigata-u.ac.jp

More information

商学 60周年記念号/24.内田浩徳

商学 60周年記念号/24.内田浩徳 SFAS 109 SFAS 96 1 2 net deductible amounts Richard 1 G. Schroeder, Myrtle W. Clark and Jack M. Cathey Financial Accounting Standards Board, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.96, Accounting

More information

わが国のレポ市場について―理論的整理と実証分析―

わが国のレポ市場について―理論的整理と実証分析― GCGC SC GCSC SC SC E-mail: yasunari.inamura@boj.or.jp E-mail: naohiko.baba@boj.or.jp GC general collateralscspecial collateral Griffiths and Winters GCFF Jordan and JordanDuffie matched book GC GC SC DuffieKrishnamurthy

More information

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate School of Economics and Institute of Economic Research

More information

Microsoft Word - 荳ク闌ゆソ雁スヲ

Microsoft Word - 荳ク闌ゆソ雁スヲ 179 1 2 3 4 2007 2009 ABCP 1 2007 2009 ABCP rollover risk 2 funding liquiditymarket liquidity 2 Brunnermeier and Pedersen20092007 2009 2007 2009 Krishnamurthy20102007 2009 2 2 5 6 2.58.5A /A3 520 CMO!

More information

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003 266 Vol. 44 No. 3 I 序論 Mirrlees 1971 Diamond 1998 Saez 2002 Kaplow 2008 1 700 900 1, 300 1, 700 II III IV V II わが国の再分配の状況と国際比較 OECD Forster and Mira d Ercole 2005 2006 2001 Winter 08 267 図 1 図 2 2000 2

More information

固定資産の減損会計へのリアル・オプション・アプローチ

固定資産の減損会計へのリアル・オプション・アプローチ NPV NPV NPV join resource NPV 1 004, 6-7 005 4 1 ( ( 1)) 1 (3) 003 176-177 1999 10-104 IASC 1998, paras. B0, B35 probabiliy crierioneconomic crierion (1) NPV ne presen value mehod NPV () join resource

More information

1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199

1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199 Nelson-Siegel Nelson-Siegel 1992 2007 15 1 Nelson and Siegel(1987) 2 FF VAR 1996 FF B) 1 Nelson-Siegel 15 90 1 Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel

More information

メイン寄せリスクと貸出債権価値の評価:ゲーム論的リアルオプションによるアプローチ

メイン寄せリスクと貸出債権価値の評価:ゲーム論的リアルオプションによるアプローチ 2 i ii RIETI E-mail: tshibata@tmu.ac.jp E-mail: tetsuya.yamada@boj.or.jp / /2008.11 1 1. 2007 2 1 DCF DCF Leland [1994] Mella-Barral and Perraudin [1997] DCF DCF 2 /2008.11 1 1 3 2 Mella-Barral and Perraudin

More information

季刊 企業と法創造 第1巻第4号(通巻第4号)

季刊 企業と法創造 第1巻第4号(通巻第4号) Aoki and Patrick Hoshi and Kashyap ROE 125 ROA Aoki Odagiri Frankl Fruin 126 NEEDS ROE ROA ROE ROEROA ROE ROEIQ ROE ROE ROE 127 128 IQ ROE ROE ROE ROE ROA ROE 129 Miyajima 130 Okazaki Teranishi GHQ % Prowse,

More information

Living Voices from Dublin, Times Educational Supplement Writing Poetry Writing Poetry Making Your Own Days Rose, Where Did You Get That Red? Times Educational Supplement Writing Poetry Writing Poetry

More information

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Quarterly Journal of Economics Review of Economics and Statistics Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis Economics of Education Review Journal of Political

More information

D F I CP (equity finance) CP (debt finance) ( )

D F I CP (equity finance) CP (debt finance) ( ) 1990 2001 2 26 1 1990 1990 1 1992 4 D F I 50 3 26000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 CP (equity finance) CP (debt finance) 1960 1995 ( ) 1970 60 2 1970 1990 85 CP (disintermediation) 1995-1998 BIS Hoshi et al (1991) 1990

More information

36巻目次.indd

36巻目次.indd 36 12 論 文 知的財産評価と企業価値 岩城康史 ( 関西学院大学大学院 ) 岡田克彦 ( 関西学院大学 ) 要 1970 1977 2009 33 旨 キーワード 1 はじめに 400 120 1 2013 9 6 1,000 Griliches et al. 1986 1 2014 6 22 2 36 12 Trajtenberg 1990 Weighted Patent Count, WPC

More information

untitled

untitled 834864 () 24 SC ( ( 2 (99 Robert W. ogeldouglass C. North "for having renewed research in economic history by applying economic theory and quantitative methods in order to explain economic and institutional

More information

<90AD8DF489C88A D322E696E6462>

<90AD8DF489C88A D322E696E6462> Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 27 2011 11 2011 2011 10 2013 1950 1 1953 12 atoms for peace 2 3 1948 1960 1956 4 1958 1 1955 2 1957 IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency

More information

人工知能学会研究会資料 SIG-FPAI-B Predicting stock returns based on the time lag in information diffusion through supply chain networks 1 1 Yukinobu HA

人工知能学会研究会資料 SIG-FPAI-B Predicting stock returns based on the time lag in information diffusion through supply chain networks 1 1 Yukinobu HA 人工知能学会研究会資料 SIG-FPAI-B508-08 - - Predicting stock returns based on the time lag in information diffusion through supply chain networks 1 1 Yukinobu HAMURO 1 Katsuhiko OKADA 1 1 1 Kwansei Gakuin University

More information

( ) z W n u K P N P = (1 + z)wn N = nuk (1) (2) I/K u e f r l (= L/PK) (4) I K = g(u, r, e f, l ) g u > 0, g r < 0, g e f > 0,

( ) z W n u K P N P = (1 + z)wn N = nuk (1) (2) I/K u e f r l (= L/PK) (4) I K = g(u, r, e f, l ) g u > 0, g r < 0, g e f > 0, 1 money view credit view IS-LM Sims[1980] Bernanke[1983] 1930 Bernanke and Blinder[1988] IS-LM (credit channel) (1) 3 4 (2) 2 1 3 4 5 2 2.1 2.1.1 ( ) z W n u K P N P = (1 + z)wn N = nuk (1) (2) 2.1.2 I/K

More information

Kobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI

Kobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI Kobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI 成人寿命の増加と国民貯蓄率に関する実証研究 (An Empirical Analysis on Increase

More information

2_2_ _ _ p65

2_2_ _ _ p65 13000209ィーィェィィィコ 0503ィ 0107. 050208. 8. 2006. 000407. 3 08. 00. 09ィ ィコィョ050209 080201000303000606 02030606000809050102050606 050604070806070404 0808030606080908 06 03040800 05020905060003010102050606:

More information

(1) (2) 27 7 15 (1) (2), E-mail: bessho@econ.keio.ac.jp 1 2 1.1......................................... 2 1.2............................... 2 1.3............................... 3 1.4............................

More information

Attendance Demand for J-League õ Shinsuke KAWAI* and Takeo HIRATA* Abstract The purpose of this study was to clarify the variables determining the attendance in J-league matches, using the 2,699 J-league

More information

BJ-No.7 01 三好秀和.indd

BJ-No.7 01 三好秀和.indd Vol. 72013 1 1 AIJ 1 AIJ AIJ AIJ AIJ 1 2 3 4 AIJ 2 1986 1986 1 21986 2007 7 2 Vol. 7 3 4 1986 1986 5 5 6 31981 1984 1986 23 3 23 3 247 502 6 22 17 26.4 19.8 5 4 18 7 12 16 10915 200737 41 AIJ 52007 7 62011

More information

Public Investment, the Rate of Return, and Optimal Fiscal Policy Economic Growth Pioneering Economic Theory Mathematical Theories of Economic Growth Review of Economic Studiesvol.27 Econometrica vol.34

More information

04_田平正典.indd

04_田平正典.indd 8 61832015 1 61 GKS Becker and Fuest2003 GKS 1 1 1 1 1 3 10 25 NEEDS Financial QUEST 1 2014882013 0.25510.2070.0756 0.3564 10.0756 62 1 Feldstein and Summers1979 Devereux and Griffith2003 Gordon, Kalambokidis

More information

Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 53 動学的資本税協調と公的資本形成 あらまし Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Batina はじめに Zodr

Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 53 動学的資本税協調と公的資本形成 あらまし Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Batina はじめに Zodr Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 53 動学的資本税協調と公的資本形成 あらまし Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Batina 2009 1. はじめに Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Tax Competition

More information

証券市場の機能と証券業務

証券市場の機能と証券業務 I Kiyoshi Nikami / 2012 3 277 1 111 166 60% 2006 3 288 228 60 21% 2008 9 1 1 28 1 300 30 FX 072 2012 winter / No.394 II 1 1 2004 34 3 2012 3 2 2 1 2004 3 2012 3 2004 3 2012 3 108 97 3,096,639 2,472,091

More information

研究シリーズ第40号

研究シリーズ第40号 165 PEN WPI CPI WAGE IIP Feige and Pearce 166 167 168 169 Vector Autoregression n (z) z z p p p zt = φ1zt 1 + φ2zt 2 + + φ pzt p + t Cov( 0 ε t, ε t j )= Σ for for j 0 j = 0 Cov( ε t, zt j ) = 0 j = >

More information

untitled

untitled Barro Regression Does social capital improve regional economic growth? - Investigation using prefectural cross-sectional data in Japan - Abstract The purpose of this research is to empirically examine

More information

日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析

日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析 196 2017 * ** ** 1 2 3 JEL Classification Codes D14, D15, E21 Keywords * 28 Hyun- Hoon Lee Robert Owen Kwanho Shin ** 29 196 An Empirical Analysis of the Saving Behavior of Elderly Households in Japan

More information

448 Vol. 44 No 図

448 Vol. 44 No 図 Spring 09 447 概要 2004 1 2 I はじめに 19 2007 1. 34 2006 1. 32 90 1 90 Galor and Weil 1996 1996 1999 90 Sleebos 2003 Apps and Rees 2004 Martínez and Iza 2004 448 Vol. 44 No. 4 2. 20 2. 00 1. 80 1. 60 1. 40

More information

ボーナス制度と家計貯蓄率-サーベイ・データによる再検証-

ボーナス制度と家計貯蓄率-サーベイ・データによる再検証- ESRI Discussion Paper Series No.139 by May 2005 Economic and Social Research Instute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan * 400 : JEL classification: D12, E21 * 186-8603 2-1 042-580-8369 FAX 042-580-8333 1 Abstract

More information

A5 PDF.pwd

A5 PDF.pwd Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title 日 本 版 不 動 産 投 資 信 託 ( J-REIT) における 利 益 相 反 問 題 Author(s) Kojima, Koji, 児 島, 幸 治 Citation 商 学 論 究, 63(3): 359-375 Issue Date 2016-03-10 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10236/14192

More information

商学 66‐1☆/16.田口

商学 66‐1☆/16.田口 251 1 2, 3 4, 5 2 1 2005 stakeholder agent p.13 2005 2009, 2011, 2012, 2013 b, 2014 Taguchi et al.2013 Aoki2001, 201019962010 2014 2013! 252 2 " " " " 6 " " " " 7 2! 3 p.5 2013 2011201120132012 Aoki20012004

More information

アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて

アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて * ** 199 1 1996-97 relation * ** Seoul conference China and Emerging Asia: Reorganizing the Global Economy? held by KIEP and Seoul National University 26 5 11-12 Hugh Patrick Yung-Chul Park 26 9 9-1 East

More information

野村資本市場研究所|アジアの金融競争力(PDF)

野村資本市場研究所|アジアの金融競争力(PDF) 2013 Spring 1. GDP 3 26% 2. 3. 4. GDP 1 GDP 2000 25.4% 2012 10 IMF 1 GDP 28.7%GDP 10.7% 20.3% 2000 2012 10 2 3 2000 2012 4.2 5.4 2 2000 14% 2012 26% GDP 2012 30 10 32003 11 2013 Spring 100% 2 90% 80% 70%

More information

03.Œk’ì

03.Œk’ì HRS KG NG-HRS NG-KG AIC Fama 1965 Mandelbrot Blattberg Gonedes t t Kariya, et. al. Nagahara ARCH EngleGARCH Bollerslev EGARCH Nelson GARCH Heynen, et. al. r n r n =σ n w n logσ n =α +βlogσ n 1 + v n w

More information

untitled

untitled 2 book conference 1990 2003 14 Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 M1,M2 M1 Sekine(1998) Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 1. (1989), Yoshida and Rasche(1990), Rasche(1990), 19921997, Fujiki and Mulligan(1996),

More information

01-._..

01-._.. Journal of the Faculty of Management and Information Systems, Prefectural University of Hiroshima 2014 No.6 pp.43 56 43 The risk measure for resilience in the inventory control system Nobuyuki UENO, Yu

More information

2 / 24

2 / 24 2017 11 9 1 / 24 2 / 24 Solow, 1957 total factor productivity; TFP 5% 経済成長率の要因分解 4% 3% 2.68% 2.51% 2% 1% 0% 1.63% 1.50% 0.34% 0.42% 0.55% 0.97% 1.14% 0.86% 0.13% -0.59% -0.59% -0.09% 0.01% -1% 1970-80

More information

202 2 9 Vol. 9 yasuhisa.toyosawa@mizuho-cb.co.jp 3 3 Altman968 Z Kaplan and Urwitz 979 Merton974 Support Vector Machine SVM 20 20 2 SVM i s i x b si t = b x i i r i R * R r (R,R, L,R ), R < R < L < R

More information

Vol. 3 No (Mar. 2010) An Option Valuation Model Based on an Asset Pricing Model Incorporating Investors Beliefs Kentaro Tanaka, 1 Koich

Vol. 3 No (Mar. 2010) An Option Valuation Model Based on an Asset Pricing Model Incorporating Investors Beliefs Kentaro Tanaka, 1 Koich Vol. 3 No. 2 51 64 (Mar. 2010 1 1 1 An Option Valuation Model Based on an Asset Pricing Model Incorporating Investors Beliefs Kentaro Tanaka, 1 Koichi Miyazaki 1 and Koji Nishiki 1 Preceding researches

More information

Microsoft Word - 蜀・伐豬ゥ蠕ウ

Microsoft Word - 蜀・伐豬ゥ蠕ウ 821 FIN 48 FIN 48 FIN 48 SFAS 109 SFAS 109 SFAS 109 more likely than not 1 Financial Accounting Standards Board, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.109, Accounting for Income Taxes, February

More information

税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析

税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析 Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title Author(s) 税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析 Uemura, Toshiyuki, 上村, 敏之 ; Kitamura Takayuki, 金田, 陸幸 Citation 経済学論究, 69(4): 1-16 Issue Date 2016-3-20 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10236/14671

More information

(1) (Karlan, 2004) (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1

(1) (Karlan, 2004) (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1 2004 1 8 2005 12 17 1 (1) (Karlan, 2004) 2 3 4 5 E-mail: aa37065@mail.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1 2 2 2.1 (, 1978, 7 ) (2) (1988) 38 2 (3) (4) (2) (1986) 91 (1996) 2 1 (1993) 1

More information

global imbalances ) * 1

global imbalances ) * 1 global imbalances 2 3 45 6 1) * 1 68 53 Denison 1958 2 Denison 1958 Feldstein and Fane 1973 1946 1968 Feldstein 19731978 David and Scadding 1974Furstenberg 1981Pitelis 1987 Poterba 1986 1948 1986 Bhatia

More information

Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL

Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue 2012-06 Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/23085 Right Hitotsubashi University Repository

More information

Ver. 1.0 (discretion) (revenue management) (fictitious revenue recognition) (window dressing) (fraudulent accounting practice) SEC (General

Ver. 1.0 (discretion) (revenue management) (fictitious revenue recognition) (window dressing) (fraudulent accounting practice) SEC (General 2004.11.25 Ver. 1.0 (discretion) (revenue management) (fictitious revenue recognition) (window dressing) (fraudulent accounting practice) SEC (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles: GAAP) GAAP (realization

More information

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察 1998 1999 1998 1999 10 10 1999 30 (1982, 1996) (1997) (1977) (1990) (1996) (1997) (1996) Ihori, Doi, and Kondo (1999) (1982) (1984) (1987) (1993) (1997) (1998) CAPM 1980 (time inconsistency) Persson, Persson

More information