text.dvi

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "text.dvi"

Transcription

1 Abstract JP Morgan CreditMetrics (1) () (3) (4)

2 1 BIS BIS 1 BIS 1 3 ALM (1) Value at Risk () (3) RAROC (Risk Ajusted Return On Capital) (4)

3 % (= p ) ~x X Prf~x Xg = p p p 99% 1% [4] 3 3

4 100 A 100 A [18] 4 () 4 (1) () (3) (4) RiskMetrics [5] 41 ( ) 4

5 3 [4] () i i ~r i;y ~r i;y = (1 + R i;y ) (1 0 d ~ i;y ) 0 1 (1) R i;y = i y ~d i;y = i y r i;y d i;y [1, 10, 19] () E[r i ] () ri ri ;r j ( ) () portfolio portfolio = x 0 6x 6 = r i x = 4 5

6 1: Aaa Aa A Baa Ba B [9] 3 3 (1) 3 4 t n n + 1 X n n + 1 h n = Prfn X n + 1g () X 6

7 h(t) = h(t; z) = h 0 (t) expf 0 zg (3) z = ( ) = h 0 (t) = 1 3 GDP GDP h 0 4 i L ~ i 3 4 [4, 7] L ~ P ~ i L i P ~ i L i 4 L ~ i i 7

8 1 i D 0 p i1 p i p id t 0 1 t p i1 p i p id T 0 1 T 1 P 1: 43 1 ( ) t i q i;t q i;t+1 = DX j=1 p j;i q j;t (4) q t = P = p i;d = 0 0 q 1;t q ;t q D;t q t+1 = Pq t (5) 1 C A p 1;1 p ;1 111 p D;1 p 1; p ; 111 p D; p 1;D p ;D 111 p D;D ( 0 (i 6= D) 1 (i = D) 1 C A i + k i i + j (k > j > 0) i p i+j;i > p i+k;i (k > j > 0) (6) [6, 19] (6) i L ~ i L P ~ i L i 8

9 4 5 P P L ~ i CreditMetrics 44 V dv = V dt + V dz (7) 5 z [3, ] 1 (7) i L ~ i L P ~ i L i 4 (7) (7) 9

10 dz L ~ i i (7) 5 ( ) () : ( ) () t i v it v i;t+1 = v it + a i + b 1i ~x 1 + b i ~x i (8) ~x j = j a i = i b ji = j i i = 10

11 1 : ( : %) ( 1) ( ) 3 ( 3) i i t 0 1nt D D : x x N(0; 6) (9) 6 x i i v i N( i ; i ) (10) i = v it + a i (11) i = b0 6b + Var( i ) (1) x i 51 v i;t+1 i i, i v 3 i = v i 0 i i (13) v 3 i 3 4% 3 849% 4 90% 5 10% 08% x v 3 i c c+1 x c;c+1 x Z xc01;c 1 p c = p e 0 1 z dz (14) x c;c+1 p c c 11

12 (1 + r)p 1 rp rp 3 t % D 08% 10% 4 90% 4% x 45 = 0:09 x 5D = 0:41 x 34 = 01:4 x 3 = 1:73 v 3 i rp 1 P t 3 5: 4: v 3 i 5 PV def ( 5 ) PV def = d01 X t=1 D t rp + D d P (15) d = D t = t ( ) r = P = = PV nodef PV nodef = TX t=1 D t rp + D T P (16) T 1

13 (%) 6: 7: L L = PV nodef 0 PV def (17) 53 10,000 ( ) 6 ( 99%) 7 x y 4 x y 4 8 p L L = (a + bq(p)) 4 + (18) a, b q(p) p p = Z q(p) 01 1 p e 0 1 z dz (19) 13

14 ^ (%) 8: 4 9: 54 RAROC ( ) ( ) ( ) 14

15 ^ : 4 10% 9 4 ( 10) 55 CreditMetrics JP Morgan CreditMetrics [6] CreditMetrics 1 1 CreditMetrics CreditMetrics [0, 5] 15

16 6 [1] Altman ES Why business fail The Journal of Business Strategy, pp 15{1, 1983 [] Robert CMerton On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates Journal of Political Economy, pp 449{470, 1973 [3] Fischer Black and Myron Scholes The pricing of options and corporate liablities Journal of Political Economy, pp 637{654, 1973 [4] TR Fleming and DP Harrington Counting process and survival analysis John Wiley and Sons, 1991 [5] JP Morgan Risk Metrics Technical Document JP Morgan, 199 [6] JP Morgan Credit Metrics Technical Document JP Morgan, 1997 [7] JD Kalbeish and RL Prentice The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data John Wiley and Sons, 1980 [8] M Kijima and K Komoribayashi A markov chain model for valuing credit risk derivatives preprint, 1997 [9] Moody's Investors Service,, 1, 1994 [10] Platt HD and Platt MB Business cycle eects on state corporate failure rates Journal of Economics and Business, pp 113{ 17, 1994 [11] Robert AJarrow, David Lando, and Stuart MTurnbull A markov model for the term structure of credit risk spreads Review of Financial Studies, pp 481{53, 1997 [1], pp 7{100,

17 [13], (), 1997 [14],, [15] I, 1994 [16] II, 1994 [17], pp 40{57, [18], pp 5{54, 1997 [19],, [0], JCR, pp 5{9, 1996 [1] ALM, 1995 [],, 1997 [3] 4, [4],, pp 10{, [5], 1997 [6],

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J- 9 -J-19 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J- 9 -J-19 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J- 9 -J-19 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8630 03 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J- 9 -J-19 1999 6 * * [1999] *(E-mail:

More information

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─ q E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] OECD Vives Tirole Shleifer and Vishny q %% %% % % Allen and Gale %% % Admati, Pfreiderer and Zechner Burkart, Gromb and Panunzi Cremer 1995Pagno

More information

IT

IT IT 2013 2013 Sony Bank Disclosure 1 2 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 18 19 19 20 20 21 22 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 34 36 47 47 47 48 56 56 60 61 64 66 70 71 72 77 82 87 192 92 193 92 4 92 MONEYKit PostPet PostPet

More information

バーリ&ミーンズの株式会社論

バーリ&ミーンズの株式会社論 The Modern Corporation and Private Property The Modern Corporation and Private Property The journal of Law and Economics Harvard Law Review The Modern Corporation and Private Property Harvard

More information

相互取引に伴う債権債務の依存構造を考慮した金融機関の与信評価について

相互取引に伴う債権債務の依存構造を考慮した金融機関の与信評価について IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES 相互取引に伴う債権債務の依存構造を考慮した金融 機関の与信評価について にしでかつまさ 西出勝正 Discussion Paper No. 2015-J-6 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 日本銀行金融研究所 103-8660 東京都中央区日本橋本石町 2-1-1

More information

Vol. 3 No (Mar. 2010) An Option Valuation Model Based on an Asset Pricing Model Incorporating Investors Beliefs Kentaro Tanaka, 1 Koich

Vol. 3 No (Mar. 2010) An Option Valuation Model Based on an Asset Pricing Model Incorporating Investors Beliefs Kentaro Tanaka, 1 Koich Vol. 3 No. 2 51 64 (Mar. 2010 1 1 1 An Option Valuation Model Based on an Asset Pricing Model Incorporating Investors Beliefs Kentaro Tanaka, 1 Koichi Miyazaki 1 and Koji Nishiki 1 Preceding researches

More information

アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて

アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて * ** 199 1 1996-97 relation * ** Seoul conference China and Emerging Asia: Reorganizing the Global Economy? held by KIEP and Seoul National University 26 5 11-12 Hugh Patrick Yung-Chul Park 26 9 9-1 East

More information

商品流動性リスクの計量化に関する一考察(その2)―内生的流動性リスクを考慮したストレス・テスト―

商品流動性リスクの計量化に関する一考察(その2)―内生的流動性リスクを考慮したストレス・テスト― E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Bangia et al. G Bangia et al. exogenous liquidity risk endogenous liquidity risk et al LTCMLong Term Capital Management Fed G G T

More information

Masahiro NAKANO Keynes benchmark Keynes 89

Masahiro NAKANO Keynes benchmark Keynes 89 89 102 Masahiro NAKANO Keynes benchmark Keynes 89 ( )IS LM Keynes Hicks IS LM Phillips stylized fact ( ) ( ) 90 Keynes 3 superneutrality 4 RBC 2 1 (i) (ii) (a) (b) (c) 3 Keynes 91 Walras Keynes Say s law

More information

untitled

untitled 2007 2 * (i) (ii) 2006 7 1999 2 2000 8 1 (2003) Oda and Ueda (2005) 2005 Kimura and Small(2006) Iwamura, Shiratsuka and Watanabe (2006) (2006) 3 (i) (ii) (iii) 2 2 3 4 2.1 (2003) (2005) 1) (i) (ii) (i)

More information

わが国のレポ市場について―理論的整理と実証分析―

わが国のレポ市場について―理論的整理と実証分析― GCGC SC GCSC SC SC E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] GC general collateralscspecial collateral Griffiths and Winters GCFF Jordan and JordanDuffie matched book GC GC SC DuffieKrishnamurthy

More information

,255 7, ,355 4,452 3,420 3,736 8,206 4, , ,992 6, ,646 4,

,255 7, ,355 4,452 3,420 3,736 8,206 4, , ,992 6, ,646 4, 30 8 IT 28 1,260 3 1 11. 1101. 1102. 1103. 1 3 1,368.3 3 1,109.8 p.5,p.7 2 9,646 4,291 14.5% 10,p.11 3 3,521 8 p.13 45-49 40-44 50-54 019 5 3 1 2,891 3 6 1 3 95 1 1101 1102 1103 1101 1102 1103 1 6,255

More information

ir資料4 2.ai

ir資料4 2.ai Outline of business Outline of business Outline of business Outline of business Achievement transition Achievement transition Achievement transition Achievement transition Achievement transition Profit

More information

第42巻第1号【論説】銀行経営研究序説

第42巻第1号【論説】銀行経営研究序説 42 1 2003 5 45 1 2 1 2 3 3 1 2 3 1) 10 2) 1) 19972 9 2) 46 42 1 3) 4) 1 5) 6) 7) 8) 3) 4) 1 5) 6) 7) 8) 47 9) 10) 11) 2 1 1997 12) 3 2 2 9) 95 97 98 10) 2002 11 11) 1997 2000 12) 19976 7 48 42 1 2 19971997

More information

IS-LM (interest) 100 (net rate of interest) (rate of interest) ( ) = 100 (2.1) (gross rate of interest) ( ) = 100 (2.2)

IS-LM (interest) 100 (net rate of interest) (rate of interest) ( ) = 100 (2.1) (gross rate of interest) ( ) = 100 (2.2) 1 2 2 2 2.1 IS-LM 1 2.2 1 1 (interest) 100 (net rate of interest) (rate of interest) ( ) = 100 (2.1) (gross rate of interest) ( ) = 100 (2.2) 1 1. 2. 1 1 ( ) 2.3. 3 2.3 1 (yield to maturity) (rate of return)

More information

untitled

untitled PPP 1 2 PPP 2.1 PPP 4 PPP PPP 4 (1) PPP (2) (3) (4) 2.2 PPP PPP PPP 4 2-1 PPP Country Risk Related Laws & Regulations PPP Legal and Regulatory Framework Instit l Framework Instit l Strategic Planning Capacity

More information

濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G

濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G 濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G34 950-2181 2 8050 Tel. and fax: 025-262-6538 E-mail: [email protected]

More information

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J-17 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8630 203 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J-17 1999 6 * JEL classification E52 E58

More information

-

- - - v vt t y r y W0W9WwWq c zx t - -4 ud d dr y r y x dx id d d d d x d d r Wq Wq d Uu Xd Xd -5 x dt r o Tx Ii Xd XdXd v c z x d t r o Ii Xd XdXd -6 -7 o y v vt t y W0W9WwWq -8 cc zx t d d v z r d y -9

More information

1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199

1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199 Nelson-Siegel Nelson-Siegel 1992 2007 15 1 Nelson and Siegel(1987) 2 FF VAR 1996 FF B) 1 Nelson-Siegel 15 90 1 Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel

More information

Q A Q A 1

Q A Q A 1 IHI Report Q A Q A 1 Q A Q A To Our Shareholders 2 706 803 42 9 1,030 790 66 17 1,894 1,716 55 103 3 Business Review by Segment 1,350 57 45 1,310 704 34 16 755 103 31 16 41 763 16 10 554 4 Performance

More information

An Empirical Study of the Securities Firms' Dilemma on Financial Innovation through Diffusion of Internet Deals Yasugi Satoshi Bower, J. L., 1999, Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave,

More information

Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) ,

Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) , ,, 2010 8 24 2010 9 14 A B C A (B Negishi(1960) (C) ( 22 3 27 ) E-mail:[email protected] E-mail:[email protected] E-mail:[email protected] 1 1 1 2 3 Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987)

More information

,398 4% 017,

,398 4% 017, 6 3 JEL Classification: D4; K39; L86,,., JSPS 34304, 47301.. 1 01301 79 1 7,398 4% 017,390 01 013 1 1 01 011 514 8 1 Novos and Waldman (1984) Johnson (1985) Chen and Png (003) Arai (011) 3 1 4 3 4 5 0

More information

P P P P P P P P P P P P P

P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 1 (1) (2) (3) (1) (2) (3) 1 ( ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 ( 0563-00-0000 ( 090-0000-0000 ) 052-00-0000 ( ) ( ) () 1 3 0563-00-0000 3 [] g g cc [] [] 4 5 1 DV 6 7 1 DV 8 9 10 11 12 SD 13 .....

More information

03.Œk’ì

03.Œk’ì HRS KG NG-HRS NG-KG AIC Fama 1965 Mandelbrot Blattberg Gonedes t t Kariya, et. al. Nagahara ARCH EngleGARCH Bollerslev EGARCH Nelson GARCH Heynen, et. al. r n r n =σ n w n logσ n =α +βlogσ n 1 + v n w

More information

2 / 24

2 / 24 2017 11 9 1 / 24 2 / 24 Solow, 1957 total factor productivity; TFP 5% 経済成長率の要因分解 4% 3% 2.68% 2.51% 2% 1% 0% 1.63% 1.50% 0.34% 0.42% 0.55% 0.97% 1.14% 0.86% 0.13% -0.59% -0.59% -0.09% 0.01% -1% 1970-80

More information

橡計画0.PDF

橡計画0.PDF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 120. ( ) 620 250 29 30 31 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 Return on Risk Assets 57 58

More information

genron-3

genron-3 " ( K p( pasals! ( kg / m 3 " ( K! v M V! M / V v V / M! 3 ( kg / m v ( v "! v p v # v v pd v ( J / kg p ( $ 3! % S $ ( pv" 3 ( ( 5 pv" pv R" p R!" R " ( K ( 6 ( 7 " pv pv % p % w ' p% S & $ p% v ( J /

More information

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Quarterly Journal of Economics Review of Economics and Statistics Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis Economics of Education Review Journal of Political

More information

A B A E

A B A E 10533-68-3955 10533-68-3955 10533-68-3804 RP A-6 10533-68-3804 10533-69-9615 10533-57-2161 B-2 10533-68-2274 10533-68-2221 10533-67-6282 A-6 10533-57-2161 E-3 10533-68-5161 10533-68-3553 D-2 D-2 10533-69-5258

More information

復活だぁっ! 日本の不況と流動性トラップの逆襲

復活だぁっ! 日本の不況と流動性トラップの逆襲 It s Baaack! Japan s Slump and the Return of the Liquidity Trap 1998 2001 8 29-9 9 Ver.1.0.1 1 2 2 5 2.1..................................... 5 2.2......................... 6 2.3.........................

More information

子ども・子育て支援新制度 全国総合システム(仮称)に関するインターフェース仕様書 市町村・都道府県編(初版)

子ども・子育て支援新制度 全国総合システム(仮称)に関するインターフェース仕様書 市町村・都道府県編(初版) 1...1 1.1... 1 1.1.1... 1 1.2... 3 1.2.1... 3 1.2.2... 4 1.3... 5 1.4... 6 1.4.1... 6 (1) B11:...6 (2) B11:...8 1.4.2... 11 (1) B31:... 11 1.4.3... 12 (1) B21, B41:... 12 2... 14 2.1... 14 2.1.1... 14

More information

高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―

高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析― 196 2017 * ** ** ** ** 160 2 2 JEL Classification Codes E21, E22, J11 Keywords * ESRI 28 ESRI 29 3 17 ESRI ** 115 196 Population Aging and Domestic Investment An Analysis Using International Panel Data

More information

No

No No. 1 2 No. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 No. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 No. 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 No. 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 No. 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62

More information

「国債の金利推定モデルに関する研究会」報告書

「国債の金利推定モデルに関する研究会」報告書 : LG 19 7 26 2 LG Quadratic Gaussian 1 30 30 3 4 2,,, E-mail: [email protected], E-mail: [email protected] 1 L G 2 1 L G r L t),r G t) L r L t) G r G t) r L t) h G t) =r G t) r L t) r L t)

More information

1 12 ( )150 ( ( ) ) x M x 0 1 M 2 5x 2 + 4x + 3 x 2 1 M x M 2 1 M x (x + 1) 2 (1) x 2 + x + 1 M (2) 1 3 M (3) x 4 +

1 12 ( )150 ( ( ) ) x M x 0 1 M 2 5x 2 + 4x + 3 x 2 1 M x M 2 1 M x (x + 1) 2 (1) x 2 + x + 1 M (2) 1 3 M (3) x 4 + ( )5 ( ( ) ) 4 6 7 9 M M 5 + 4 + M + M M + ( + ) () + + M () M () 4 + + M a b y = a + b a > () a b () y V a () V a b V n f() = n k= k k () < f() = log( ) t dt log () n+ (i) dt t (n + ) (ii) < t dt n+ n

More information

バリュー・アット・リスクのリスク指標としての妥当性について ― 理論的サーベイによる期待ショートフォールとの比較分析―

バリュー・アット・リスクのリスク指標としての妥当性について ― 理論的サーベイによる期待ショートフォールとの比較分析― aaaab aabab VaR VaRArtzner et al. VaR VaR VaR Artzner et al.var VaR VaR VaR ρ XY ρ (X+Y ) ρ(x) + ρ(y ) XY ρ VaRArtzner et al.1999basak and Shapiro1999Danielsson2000Rootzén and Klüppelberg VaR VaR VaRVaR

More information

スライド 1

スライド 1 19 9 9 26 39 38 100 300 30 37 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2004 Vol.132(12) Web http://www.nsknet.or.jp/katoh/honbun.html http://www.hyo-med.ac.jp/department/ped/qa/rota.html http://kodomo-qq.jp/ http://www.guide.metro.tokyo.jp/

More information

(2005a) (2005) (2004-2005) (2004) (2003) 3 (2003) (2003) 2

(2005a) (2005) (2004-2005) (2004) (2003) 3 (2003) (2003) 2 Offshore Software Outsourcing in Japan 1 2 3 4 5 1 2001 500 3 60 10 MD IT 2003 50 2004 236-7 BPO 1 100 2 (2000) (2001) (2001) (2004) (2005) (2005b) (2005) (2005) 1 (2005a) (2005) (2004-2005) (2004) (2003)

More information

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL   Right Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): 54-76 Issue Date 1996-07 URL https://doi.org/10.14989/45083 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher

More information

76 3 B m n AB P m n AP : PB = m : n A P B P AB m : n m < n n AB Q Q m A B AQ : QB = m : n (m n) m > n m n Q AB m : n A B Q P AB Q AB 3. 3 A(1) B(3) C(

76 3 B m n AB P m n AP : PB = m : n A P B P AB m : n m < n n AB Q Q m A B AQ : QB = m : n (m n) m > n m n Q AB m : n A B Q P AB Q AB 3. 3 A(1) B(3) C( 3 3.1 3.1.1 1 1 A P a 1 a P a P P(a) a P(a) a P(a) a a 0 a = a a < 0 a = a a < b a > b A a b a B b B b a b A a 3.1 A() B(5) AB = 5 = 3 A(3) B(1) AB = 3 1 = A(a) B(b) AB AB = b a 3.1 (1) A(6) B(1) () A(

More information