相互取引に伴う債権債務の依存構造を考慮した金融機関の与信評価について

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "相互取引に伴う債権債務の依存構造を考慮した金融機関の与信評価について"

Transcription

1 IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES 相互取引に伴う債権債務の依存構造を考慮した金融 機関の与信評価について にしでかつまさ 西出勝正 Discussion Paper No J-6 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 日本銀行金融研究所 東京都中央区日本橋本石町 日本銀行金融研究所が刊行している論文等はホームページからダウンロードできます 無断での転載 複製はご遠慮下さい

2 備考 : 日本銀行金融研究所ディスカッション ペーパー シリーズは 金融研究所スタッフおよび外部研究者による研究成果をとりまとめたもので 学界 研究機関等 関連する方々から幅広くコメントを頂戴することを意図している ただし ディスカッション ペーパーの内容や意見は 執筆者個人に属し 日本銀行あるいは金融研究所の公式見解を示すものではない

3 AE 勝 AE 正 IMES Discussion Paper Series 2015-J 年 6 月 相互取引に伴う債権債務の依存構造を考慮した金融機関の与信評価について にしでかつまさ 西出 E E E A* 要 旨 本論文では いわゆる Merton (1974 や Black and Cox (1976 型の構造モデルを用いて 金融機関の融資先が相互に商取引をしている場合の与信 ( 融資金 の評価モデルを提示し 融資先企業の債権債務の依存構造が融資継続 回収方針や実行時点でのスプレッドに与える影響を考察する 数値分析によって 企業が持つ商取引債権は (1 資産の分散効果 ( 正の影響 (2 同時倒産効果 ( 負の影響 の 2 つの効果があり それぞれの影響度を考慮して与信判断を行う必要があるという示唆が得られる キーワード : 融資評価 構造モデル 相互取引 債権債務 JEL classification: G13 G32 G33 L14 * 横浜国立大学大学院国際社会科学研究院教授 ( knishide@ynu.ac.jp 本稿は 日本銀行金融研究所からの委託研究論文であり 作成に当たっては八木恭子氏 ( 秋田県立大学 吉羽要直氏 ( 日本銀行 内田善彦氏 ( 金融庁 から貴重なコメントを頂いた 特に, 竹山梓氏 ( 日本銀行 には 本稿作成までに至る議論を始め先行研究の紹介や細部に亘る論文のチェックなど大変有益なコメントを頂いた ここに記して感謝したい ただし 本稿に示されている意見は 筆者個人に属し 日本銀行の公式見解を示すものではない また ありうべき誤りはすべて筆者個人に属する

4 ( (2013 ( *1 2 *1 (2000 1

5 Gordy (2000 Rösch and Winterfeldt (2008 Bade et al. (2011 *2 Eisenberg and Noe (2001 Eisenberg and Noe (2001 (clearing payment vector Shin (2008, 2009 Elsinger (2009 Rogers and Veraart (2013 Suzuki (2002 Fischer (2014 Karl and Fischer (2014 Nishide et al. (2014 Nishide et al. (2014 Black and Cox (1976 ( ( *2 (2008 2

6 Diamond (1991 Mella-Barral and Perraudin (1997 Mella-Barral (1999 (2007 *3 (1 *4 (2Merton *5 (1 ( A *3 Calomiris and Kahn (1991 Diamond and Rajan (2001 *4 Mella-Barral and Perraudin (1997 *5 Diamond (1991 3

7 2 2.1 i Q i = {Q it } ˆP Q i *6 dq it = ρq it dt + σ i Q it dŵ it (2.1 ρ σ i Ŵ i ˆP ρ *7 i ( D i ( T ˆt ( *8 i (Q iˆt t = 0 T Q it B it i T 2 δ T K T T *6 ˆP hat *7 Q i ( ρ *8 Merton (1974 Black and Cox (

8 R it R it = 1 {QiT B it }D i + 1 {QiT <B it }L T (Q it L T (Q it = (1 δ T Q it K T Merton B it = D i l T > 0 B it = D i /(1 l T (1 l T Q it < D i (2.2 l T > 0 (fire sale l T (2.2 ˆt ˆt (0,T i Q iˆt *9 R it ˆt 1 Φ 1 A iˆt (Q iˆt =ʈt [ e ρ(t ˆt R it ] =e ρ(t ˆt D i Φ 1 (d i,t ˆt (Q iˆt;b it + (1 δ T Q iˆt Φ 1 ( d + i,t ˆt (Q iˆt;b it e ρ(t ˆt K T Φ 1 ( d i,t ˆt (Q iˆt;b it ʈt ˆt ˆP ( ( ( log Q d i,t ± (Q;B = B + ρ ± σ i 2 2 t σ i t *9 ( (2008 5

9 i T δˆt Kˆt Lˆt Q iˆt = (1 δˆt Q iˆt Kˆt A iˆt (Q iˆt Lˆt (Q iˆt A iˆt (Q iˆt < Lˆt (Q iˆt ˆb iˆt (B it * 10 Q iˆt ˆb iˆt (B it Q iˆt < ˆb iˆt (B it ˆb iˆt (B it b ( ˆψ i (b;b it =e ρ(t ˆt D i Φ 1 (d i,t ˆt (b;b it + (1 δ T bφ 1 d + i,t ˆt (b;b it e ρ(t ˆt K T Φ 1 ( d i,t ˆt (b;b it (1 δˆt b + Kˆt = 0 (2.3 0 P i ] [ ] P i = Ê 0 [e ρ ˆt 1 {Qiˆt ˆb iˆt (B it } A iˆt + Ê 0 e ρ ˆt 1 {Qiˆt <ˆb iˆt (B it } Lˆt(Q iˆt 2 1 κ = ˆt/T 0 i Q i0 = q i P i *10 3 B it 6

10 P i (q i ;B it =e ρt D i Φ 2 (d i,ˆt (q i; ˆb iˆt (B it,di,t (q i;b it ;κ + (1 δ T q i Φ 2 (d + i,ˆt (q i; ˆb iˆt (B it, d i,t + (q i;b it ; κ e ρt K T Φ 2 (d i,ˆt (q i; ˆb iˆt (B it, di,t (q i;b it ; κ ( + (1 δˆt q i Φ 1 ( d + i,ˆt (q i; ˆb iˆt (B it Kˆt e ρ ˆt Φ 1 d i,ˆt (q i; ˆb iˆt (B it Φ 2 (, ;κ κ 2 A 0 i P i ŝ i = 1 T log ( Di P i ρ ρ + ŝ i i D i ρ + ŝ i ˆt Q iˆt < ˆb iˆt (B it T D i L T (Q it * 11 *11 3 7

11 3 Q i0 D i T ˆt B it ρ σ i δ T δˆt K T Kˆt ˆt ˆb iˆt ˆb iˆt δ T ( 1 1 ˆb iˆt δ T b it δ T ˆt ˆb it δ T δ T ( 8

12 b iˆt δˆt ( 2 2 ˆb iˆt δˆt b it δ t T 3 i ( σ i ˆb iˆt 9

13 3 ˆb iˆt σ i b it σ i 4 T B it ˆb iˆt 10

14 4 ˆb iˆt B it b it B it B it ˆb iˆt δ T B it i ŝ i

15 5 δ T ŝ i 5 ŝ i δ T 20% 18% 16% s i 14% Review No Review 12% 10% δ T δ T ŝ i δ T δ T 2 δˆt ŝ i 6 ŝ i δˆt δˆt 12

16 6 ŝ i δˆt 20% 19% s i 18% Review No Review 17% 16% δ t δˆt 2 δˆt ˆb iˆt δˆt ŝ i b iˆt δ T δˆt ŝ i 7 σ i ŝ i 13

17 7 ŝ i σ i 35% 30% 25% 20% s i 15% Review No Review 10% 5% 0% σ i σ i σ i σ i 6 σ i ˆb iˆt 2 8 B it ŝ i 14

18 8 ŝ i B it 35.0% 30.0% 25.0% s i 20.0% Review No Review 15.0% 10.0% B it B it ŝ i δ T ŝ i B it B it q i = Q i0 ŝ i 9 15

19 9 ŝ i q i 35% 30% 25% s i 20% Review No Review 15% 10% q i q i

20 3 i = 1,...,n N A A N = n i j G i j T G ji = G i j * 12 {x} + = max{x,0} G + i j = {G i j} +, G i j = { G i j} + T i Q it + Γ i j j N Γ i j i j G + i j j Γ i j = G + i j T Γ i j < G + i j T Q it + Γ i j < D i + G i j j N j N i 2 * 13 j i j * *13 17

21 λ i j = 3 G+ i j G + h j h N ˆt T t L t (Q it = (1 δ t Q it K t, t = ˆt,T δ t K t 3 ˆt i Lˆt (Q iˆt ρ e ρ(t ˆt Lˆt (Q iˆt T 3.1 T ˆt Dˆt T D T T Eisenberg and Noe (2001 Suzuki (2002 Rogers and Veraart (2013 Cont and Minca ( Cont and Minca, 2014 ˆt Dˆt T D T 1. D (0 T = /0 * 14 *14 D (0 T = /0 Nishide et al. (2014 greatest clearing payment vector D (0 T = N \ Dˆt 18

22 2. {D (k T } {Γ(k i j } D (k+1 T = { i N \ Dˆt Q it + Γ (k i j < D i + G i j j N j N } Γ (k i j G i j 0 0 G i j > 0 { } λ i j e ρ(t ˆt Lˆt (Q jˆt D j + h Γ (k 1 h j { } λ i j L T (Q jt D j + h Γ (k 1 h j + Γ (k i j = G i j + j Dˆt j D (k 1 ˆT 3. D ( k+1 T = D ( k T D (k T D T = D ( k+1 T Γ i j = Γ ( k+1 i j Γ(k i j k 0 D (k T n n ˆt i ( ( R it = 1 {i DT }D i + 1 {i DT } L T (Q it + Γ i j (3.1 j N 3.2 ˆt A iˆt = ʈt [ e ρ(t ˆt R it ] Lˆt (Q iˆt = (1 δˆt Q iˆt K iˆt (3.2 (3.2 ˆt ˆt i {Qˆt } = {(Q 1ˆt,...,Q nˆt } least clearing payment vector 19

23 i j ( G i j > 0 ˆt Q jˆt A iˆt i G i j 3.3 (n = 2 {Q it } (2.1 2 (Ŵ 1,Ŵ 2 η G T 1 2 Γ T 21(Q 1T = {(1 δ T Q 1T K T D 1 } + ˆt 1 2 Γˆt 21(Q 1ˆt = {e ρ(t ˆt ((1 δˆt Q 1ˆt Kˆt D 1 } + G 21 Γ T 21 (D 1 + G 21 = 0 (1 δ T G 21 δ T D 1 + K T (3.3 Γ T 21 = 0 (3.3 * 15 4 T *15 T 1 G 21 3 G /3 233 (3.3 20

24 Dˆt = /0 D T = /0 {(Q 1T,Q 2T R+ Q 2 1T D 1 + G 21,Q 2T D 2 G 21 } D T = {1} {(Q 1T,Q 2T R+ Q 2 1T < D 1 + G 21,Q 2T D 2 } D T = {2} {(Q 1T,Q 2T R+ Q 2 1T D 1 + G 21,Q 2T < D 2 G 21 } D T = {1,2} {(Q 1T,Q 2T R+ Q 2 1T < D 1 + G 21,Q 2T < D 2 } (3.4 Dˆt = {1} D T = /0 {Q 2T R 1 + Q 2T + Γˆt 21 (Q 1ˆt D 2 } D T = {2} {Q 2T R 1 + Q 2T + Γˆt 21 (Q 1ˆt < D 2 } (3.5 Dˆt = {2} D T = /0 {Q 1T R+ Q 1 1T D 1 + G 21 } D T = {1} {Q 1T R+ Q 1 1T < D 1 + G 21 } Dˆt = {1,2} D T = /0 ˆt T Dˆt = /0 T q 2 D T = {1} D 2 D T = /0 D T = {1,2} D 2 G 21 D T = {2} O D 1 + G 21 q 1 (B 1T = D 1 + G 21 (B 2T = D 2 G 21 D 2 21

25 Dˆt = /0 T ( D T = /0 R 1T = D 1, R 2T = D 2 2. D T = {1} R 1T = (1 δ T Q 1T K T, R 2T = D 2 3. D T = {2} R 1T = D 1, R 2T = (1 δ T Q 2T + G 21 K T 4. D T = {1,2} R 1T = (1 δ T Q 1T K T, R 2T = (1 δ T Q 2T K T ( 1 B 1T = D 1 + G 21 ˆt 2 A 1ˆt =e ρ(t ˆt D 1 Φ 1 (d 1,T ˆt (Q 1ˆt;D 1 + G 21 + (1 δ T Q 1ˆt Φ 1 ( d + 1,T ˆt (Q 1ˆt;D 1 + G 21 e ρ(t ˆt K T Φ 1 ( d 1,T ˆt (Q 1ˆt;D 1 + G 21 (2.3 ˆψ 1 (b;d 1 + G 21 = 0 ˆb 1ˆt (D 1 + G 21 Q 1ˆt ˆb 1ˆt (D 1 + G 21 Q 1ˆt < ˆb 1ˆt (D 1 + G 21 22

26 ˆt ˆt T 2 ˆt 3.5 B 2T = D 2 Γˆt 21 (Q 1ˆt 2 ˆt 2 A 2ˆt =e ρ(t ˆt D 2 Φ 1 (d 2,T ˆt (Q 2ˆt;D 2 Γˆt 21 (Q 1ˆt + (1 δ T Q 2ˆt Φ 1 ( d + 2,T ˆt (Q 2ˆt;D 2 Γˆt 21(Q 1ˆt e ρ(t ˆt K T Φ 1 ( d 2,T ˆt (Q 2ˆt;D 2 Γˆt 21 (Q 1ˆt 2 (2.3 ˆψ 2 (b;d 2 Γˆt 21 (Q 1ˆt = 0 ˆb 2ˆt Q 2ˆt ˆb 2ˆt (D 2 Γˆt 21 (Q 1ˆt Q 2ˆt < ˆb 2ˆt (D 2 Γˆt 21 (Q 1ˆt Γˆt 21 (Q 1ˆt ˆt 2 1 ˆt 1 ˆt (3.4 T 2 Q 2T 1 Q 1T A 2ˆt A 2ˆt (Q 1ˆt,Q 2ˆt =e ρ(t ˆt ʈt [1 {DT =/0} {D T ={1}}D {DT ={2}}{(1 δ T Q 2T + G 21 K T } ] + 1 {DT ={1,2}}{(1 δ T Q 2T K T } 23

27 =e ρ(t ˆt D 2 ( ˆPˆt {Q 1T D 1 + G 21,Q 2T D 2 G 21 } + ˆPˆt {Q 1T < D 1 + G 21,Q 2T D 2 } + (1 δ T Q 2ˆt ( P 2ˆt {Q 1T D 1 + G 21,Q 2T < D 2 G 21 } + P 2ˆt {Q 1T < D 1 + G 21,Q 2T < D 2 } e ρ(t ˆt K T ( ˆPˆt {Q 1T D 1 + G 21,Q 2T < D 2 G 21 } + ˆPˆt {Q 1T < D 1 + G 21,Q 2T < D 2 } + e ρ(t ˆt G 21 ˆPˆt {Q 1T D 1 + G 21,Q 2T < D 2 G 21 } (3.6 P 2 * 16 P 2 (A = Ê[ e ρt Q 2T Q 20 (3.6 1 A ] A 2ˆt (Q 1ˆt,Q 2ˆt [ =e ρ(t ˆt D 2 Φ 2 (d 1,T ˆt (Q 1ˆt;D 1 + G 21,d 2,T ˆt (Q 2ˆt;D 2 G 21 ;η ] +Φ 2 ( d 1,T ˆt (Q 1ˆt;D 1 + G 21,d 2,T ˆt (Q 2ˆt;D 2 ; η [ + (1 δ T Q 2t Φ 2 (d η 1,T ˆt (Q 1ˆt;D 1 + G 21, d + 2,T ˆt (Q 2ˆt;D 2 G 21 ; η ] +Φ 2 ( d η 1,T ˆt (Q 1ˆt;D 1 + G 21, d + 2,T ˆt (Q 2ˆt;D 2 ;η [ e ρ(t ˆt K T Φ 2 (d 1,T ˆt (Q 1ˆt;D 1 + G 21, d 2,T ˆt (Q 2ˆt;D 2 G 21 ; η ] +Φ 2 ( d 1,T ˆt (Q 1ˆt;D 1 + G 21, d 2,T ˆt (Q 2ˆt;D 2 ;η + e ρ(t ˆt G 21 Φ 2 (d 1,T ˆt (Q 1ˆt;D 1 + G 21, d 2,T ˆt (Q 2ˆt;D 2 G 21 ; η (3.7 * 17 ( ( log Q d η 1,t (Q;B = B + ρ σ i 2(1 2η 2 t σ i t *16 Black-Scholes 1 P 1 {P K} P *17 (3.3 24

28 ˆt 2 (3.7 A 2ˆt ˆφ 2 (Q 1ˆt,Q 2ˆt = A 2ˆt (Q 1ˆt,Q 2ˆt Lˆt (Q 2ˆt (3.7 Q 2ˆt Q 1ˆt 2 1 Q 1ˆt G 21 ˆt 1. 1 ˆψ 1 (Q 1ˆt ;D 1 + G (ψ 1 (Q 1ˆt ;D 1 + G 21 < 0 2 (i ˆψ 2 (Q 2ˆt ;D 2 Γˆt 21 (Q 1ˆt 0 2 Dˆt = {1} (ii ˆψ 2 (Q 2ˆt ;D 2 Γˆt 21 (Q 1ˆt < 0 2 Dˆt = {1,2} ( ˆψ 1 (Q 1ˆt ;D 1 + G (i ˆφ 2 (Q 1ˆt,Q 2ˆt 0 2 Dˆt = /0 (ii ˆφ 2 (Q 1ˆt,Q 2ˆt < 0 2 Dˆt = {2} 25

29 P 1 1 P 1 =e ρt D 1 Φ 2 ( d 1ˆt (q 1; ˆb 1ˆt (D 1 + G 21,d 1T (q 1;D 1 + G 21 ;κ ( + (1 δ T q 1 Φ 2 d + 1ˆt (q 1; ˆb iˆt (D 1 + G 21, d 1T + (q 1;D 1 + G 21 ; κ e ρt ( K T Φ 2 d 1ˆt (q 1; ˆb 1ˆt (D 1 + G 21, d1t (q 1;D 1 + G 21 ; κ ( + (1 δˆt q 1 Φ 1 d + 1ˆt (q 1; ˆb 1ˆt (D 1 + G 21 e ρ ˆt ( Kˆt Φ 1 d 1ˆt (q 1; ˆb 1ˆt (D 1 + G 21 q i = Q i0 2 0 ] P 2 = e ρ ˆt Ê 0 [1 { ˆφ2 (Q 1ˆt,Q 2 ˆT 0} A 2ˆt (Q 1ˆt,Q 2ˆt + 1 { ˆφ2 (Q 1ˆt,Q 2 ˆT <0} Lˆt (Q 2ˆt 2 ˆφ 2 (Q 1ˆt,Q 2ˆt = A 2ˆt (Q 1ˆt,Q 2ˆt Lˆt (Q 2ˆt P 2 4 ˆt η = 0.3 G 21 = 20 3 i = 1,2 0 2 Q 20 + G 21 = 180 G 21 = 10 q 2 = Q 20 = 170 * 18 *18 Γˆt 21 = 0 26

30 1 D 1 + G (1 ( η 2 ˆb 2ˆt Dˆt = /0 Q 1ˆt =

31 11 η ˆb 2ˆt b 2t G21=0 G21=10 G21=20 G21= η η ( 2 (Q G 21 Q 1ˆt = 180 B 1T = 100 ( 12 1 ˆt 2 ˆb 2ˆt 28

32 12 ˆt Q 1ˆt ˆb 2ˆt b 2t G21=0 G21=10 G21=20 G21= Q 1t 12 Q 1ˆt 2 Q 1ˆt = 150 G 21 b 2ˆt G 21 1 η 13 Q 1ˆt =

33 13 η ˆb 2ˆt ( b 2t G21=0 G21=10 G21=20 G21= η 11 ˆb 2ˆt η ˆt 1 Q 1ˆt η 2 Q 2T 1 Q 1T 2 ( Γ 21 < G 21 2 η G 21 η 12 Q 1t = η G 21 bˆt G 21 G 21 ( G G 21 ( G

34 4.2 2 ŝ 2 14 Q 1 Q 2 η 2 ŝ 2 14 η ŝ 2 20% 19% 18% s 2 17% Review No Review 16% 15% η 2 (Q 2T 1 Q 1T 2 1 G 21 31

35 15 G 21 2 ŝ 2 15 G 21 ŝ 2 20% 19% s2 18% Review No Review 17% 16% G 21 G 21 2 ( G 21 2 G Q 2T + Γ T 21 G Γ T 21 2 ŝ 2 G 21 ( 32

36 2 Q 2 G q 2 = Q 20 = q 2 η ŝ 2 16 G 21 ŝ 2 ( 70% 65% s 2 60% Review No Review 55% 50% η η ŝ 2 ( 15( G η 33

37 2 G 21 ŝ G 21 ŝ 2 ( 75% 70% 65% 60% s 2 55% Review No Review 50% 45% 40% G G 21 G ( ŝ 2 G

38 2 A 1 P i [ ] P i =Ê 0 1 {Qiˆt ˆb iˆt } e ρt D i Φ 1 (d i,t ˆt (Q iˆt [ ] + Ê 0 1 {Qiˆt ˆb iˆt } e ρ ˆt (1 δ T Q iˆt Φ 1 ( d + i,t ˆt (Q iˆt [ ] Ê 0 1 {Qiˆt ˆb iˆt } e ρt K T Φ 1 ( d i,t ˆt (Q iˆt ] + Ê 0 [1 {Qiˆt <ˆb iˆt } e ρ ˆt {(1 δˆt Q iˆt Kˆt } (A.1 (A.1 4 Q i0 = q i Q iˆt = q i exp {(ρ σ i 2 } ˆt + σ i Ŵ 2 iˆt (A.2 35

39 x = ( logq iˆt ρ σ i 2 2 ˆt σ i ˆt = W iˆt ˆt (A.3 ˆP ϕ 1 (x Ê 0 [1 {Qiˆt <ˆb iˆt (B it } Ê 0 [1 {Qiˆt <ˆb iˆt (B it } Q iˆt {Q iˆt < ˆb iˆt } = {x > d i,t (q i,; ˆb iˆt } ] ] ( = d i,ˆt (q i;ˆb iˆt (B it ϕ 1(xdx = Φ 1 d i,ˆt (q i; ˆb iˆt (B it = d i,ˆt (q i;ˆb iˆt (B it q ie (ρ σ2 i2 ˆt+σ i ˆtxϕ1 (xdx =q i e ρ ˆt d i,ˆt (q i;ˆb iˆt (B it ϕ 1 =q i e ρ ˆt Φ 1 ( d + i,ˆt (q i; ˆb iˆt (B it ( x + σ i ˆt dx (A.1 4 ( (1 δˆt q i Φ 1 ( d + i,ˆt (q i, ˆB iˆt K iˆt e ρ ˆt Φ 1 d i,ˆt (q i, ˆB iˆt (A.1 1 (A.2 (A.3 κ = ˆt/T Ê 0 [1 {Qiˆt ˆB iˆt } Φ 1 d i,t ˆt (Q iˆt;b it = d i,ˆt (q i;b it κx 1 κ 2 ( ] d d i,t ˆt (Q iˆt;b it = i,ˆt (q i;ˆb iˆt (B it ( d i,t (q i ;B it ϕ 1 (xφ 1 dx 1 κ 2 =Φ 2 (d i,ˆt (q i; ˆb iˆt (B it,d i,t (q i;b it ;κ (A.1 2 (A.3 x x = x + σ i ˆt d + i,t ˆt (Q iˆt;b it = d+ (q i ;B it + κ x 1 κ 2 36

40 ] Ê 0 [1 {Qiˆt ˆB iˆt } e ρ ˆt Q iˆt Φ 1 ( d + i,t ˆt (Q iˆt d i,ˆt = (q i;ˆb iˆt (B it e ρ ˆt q i e (ρ σ2 i2 ( ˆt+σ i ˆtxΦ1 d + i,t (q i ;B it + κ x 1 κ 2 ( d + i,ˆt =q (q i;ˆb iˆt (B it d + i,t (q i ;B it + κ x i ϕ 1 ( xφ 1 1 κ 2 =q i Φ 2 (d + i,ˆt (q i; ˆb i,ˆt (B it, d + i,t (q i;b it ; κ d x ϕ 1 (xdx (A

41 ( (1, (2000 No.2000-J-11 (2008 No.08-J-10 (2007 EL UL 26 2 (2013 Research Focus No Bade, B., D. Rösch, and H. Scheule (2011, Default and Recovery Risk Dependencies in a Simple Credit Risk Model, European Financial Management, 17(1, Black, F. and J. C. Cox (1976, Valuing Corporate Securities: Some Effects of Bond Indenture Provisions, Journal of Finance, 31(2, Calomiris, C. W. and C. M. Kahn (1991, The Role of Demandable Debt in Structuring Optimal Banking Arrangements, American Economic Review, 81(3, Cont, R. and A. Minca (2014, Credit Default Swaps and Systemic Risk, working paper. Diamond, D. W. (1991, Monitoring and Reputation: The Choice between Bank Loans and Directly Placed Debt, Journal of Political Economy, 99(4, Diamond, D. W. and R. G. Rajan (2001, Liquidity Risk, Liquidity Creation, and Financial Fragility: A Theory of Banking, Journal of Political Economy, 109(2, Eisenberg, L. and T. H. Noe (2001, Systemic Risk in Financial Systems, Management Science, 47(2, Elsinger, H. (2009, Financial Networks, Cross Holdings, and Limited Liability, working paper. Fischer, T. (2014, No-Arbitrage Pricing under Systemic Risk: Accounting for Cross- Ownership, Mathematical Finance, 24(1, Gordy, M. B. (2000, A Comparative Anatomy of Credit Risk Models, Journal of Banking and Finance, 24(1-2, Karl, S. and T. Fischer (2014, Cross-Ownership as a Structural Explanation for Over- and Underestimation of Default Probability, Quantitative Finance, 14(6,

42 Mella-Barral, P. (1999, The Dynamics of Default and Debt Reorganization, Review of Financial Studies, 12(3, Mella-Barral, P. and W. Perraudin (1997, Strategic Debt Service, Journal of Finance, 52(2, Merton, R. C. (1974, On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates, Journal of Finance, 29(2, Nishide, K., T. Suzuki, and K. Yagi (2014, The Pricing Model of Corporate Securities under Cross-Holdings of Equities and Debts, working paper. Rogers, L. C. G. and L. A. M. Veraart (2013, Failure and Rescue in an Interbank Network, Management Science, 59(4, Rösch, D. and B. Winterfeldt (2008, Estimating Credit Contagion in a Standard-Factor Model, Risk, 21(8, Shin, H. S. (2008, Risk and Liquidity in a System Context, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 17(3, Shin, H. S. (2009, Securitisation and Financial Stability, Economic Journal, 119(536, Suzuki, T. (2002, Valuing Corporate Debt: The Effect of Cross-Holdings of Stock and Debt, Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 45(2,

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J- 9 -J-19 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J- 9 -J-19 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J- 9 -J-19 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8630 03 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J- 9 -J-19 1999 6 * * [1999] *(E-mail:

More information

第一次大戦後の日本における国債流通市場の制度改革

第一次大戦後の日本における国債流通市場の制度改革 IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 2009-J-23 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 103-8660 2-1-1 http://www.imes.boj.or.jp IMES Discussion Paper Series 2009-J-23 2009

More information

SNAと家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離-日本の貯蓄率低下の要因-

SNAと家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離-日本の貯蓄率低下の要因- RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-J-003 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-J-003 2009 年 12 月 SNA と家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離 - 日本の貯蓄率低下の要因 - 宇南山卓 ( 神戸大学大学院経済学研究科 ) 要 旨 SNA と家計調査から計算される家計貯蓄率の乖離の原因を明らかにし 日本の貯蓄率の低下の原因を考察した

More information

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate School of Economics and Institute of Economic Research

More information

1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199

1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199 Nelson-Siegel Nelson-Siegel 1992 2007 15 1 Nelson and Siegel(1987) 2 FF VAR 1996 FF B) 1 Nelson-Siegel 15 90 1 Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel

More information

株式分割払込制度と企業金融、設備投資の関係について ─1930年代初において株式追加払込が果たした役割を中心に─

株式分割払込制度と企業金融、設備投資の関係について ─1930年代初において株式追加払込が果たした役割を中心に─ IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 2007-J-20 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 103-8660 30 http://www.imes.boj.or.jp IMES Discussion Paper Series 2007-J-20 2007

More information

text.dvi

text.dvi Abstract JP Morgan CreditMetrics (1) () (3) (4) 1 3 3 4 4 5 10 6 16 1 1 BIS 1 3 1 BIS 1 BIS 1 3 ALM (1) Value at Risk () (3) RAROC (Risk Ajusted Return On Capital) (4) 3 5 6 31 99% (= p ) ~x X Prf~x Xg

More information

橡motonishi.PDF

橡motonishi.PDF 2000 3 ITME Discussion Paper No.26 850-8506 4-2-1 moto@net.nagasaki-u.ac.jp 1 1 MRF 1 (2000) 2 MRF 2 Schreft (1997) 3 2 Tobin (1985) Friedman (1992) 3 3 4 5 3 4 5 2 White (1984) 1 4 (1996) (1999) (1999)

More information

BIS CDO CDO CDO CDO Cifuentes and O Connor[1] Finger[6] Li[8] Duffie and Garleânu[4] CDO Merton[9] CDO 1 CDO CDO CDS CDO three jump model Longstaff an

BIS CDO CDO CDO CDO Cifuentes and O Connor[1] Finger[6] Li[8] Duffie and Garleânu[4] CDO Merton[9] CDO 1 CDO CDO CDS CDO three jump model Longstaff an CDO 2010 5 18 CDO(Collateralized Debt Obligation) Duffie and Garleânu[4] CDO CDS(Credit Default Swap) Duffie and Garleânu[4] 4 CDO CDS CDO CDS CDO 2007 CDO CDO CDS 1 1.1 2007 2008 9 15 ( ) CDO CDO 80 E-mail:taiji.ohka@gmail.com

More information

43 2 PD DR Sommar and Shahnazarianka [19] Simons and Rolwes [17] GDP Figlewski, Frydman and Liang [7] GDP Bonfim [2] 3 Bhattacharjee et al. [1] 2002 [

43 2 PD DR Sommar and Shahnazarianka [19] Simons and Rolwes [17] GDP Figlewski, Frydman and Liang [7] GDP Bonfim [2] 3 Bhattacharjee et al. [1] 2002 [ Transactions of the Operations Research Society of Japan Vol. 55, 2012, pp. 42 65 c ( 2011 10 25 ; 2012 3 1 ) ( PD) ( DR) 2007 DR PD 54 PD DR 0.72% PD :,,,,, 1. 1 ( PD: Probability of Default) 10 ( DR:

More information

PFI

PFI PFI 23 3 3 PFI PFI 1 1 2 3 2.1................................. 3 2.2..................... 4 2.3.......................... 5 3 7 3.1................................ 7 3.2.................................

More information

202 2 9 Vol. 9 yasuhisa.toyosawa@mizuho-cb.co.jp 3 3 Altman968 Z Kaplan and Urwitz 979 Merton974 Support Vector Machine SVM 20 20 2 SVM i s i x b si t = b x i i r i R * R r (R,R, L,R ), R < R < L < R

More information

1990年代以降の日本の経済変動

1990年代以降の日本の経済変動 1990 * kenichi.sakura@boj.or.jp ** hitoshi.sasaki@boj.or.jp *** masahiro.higo@boj.or.jp No.05-J-10 2005 12 103-8660 30 * ** *** 1990 2005 12 1990 1990 1990 2005 11 2425 BIS E-mail: kenichi.sakura@boj.or.jp

More information

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察 1998 1999 1998 1999 10 10 1999 30 (1982, 1996) (1997) (1977) (1990) (1996) (1997) (1996) Ihori, Doi, and Kondo (1999) (1982) (1984) (1987) (1993) (1997) (1998) CAPM 1980 (time inconsistency) Persson, Persson

More information

日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について:アップデートと考察

日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について:アップデートと考察 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 18-J-024 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 18-J-024 2018 年 8 日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について : アップデートと考察 1 宇南 卓 ( 経済産業研究所 ) 野太郎 ( 信州 学 ) 要 旨 全国消費実態調査 家計調査 家計消費状況調査を補完的に利用することでマクロ統計と整合的な貯蓄率のデータを構築した宇南山

More information

会社法制上の資本制度の変容と企業会計上の資本概念について

会社法制上の資本制度の変容と企業会計上の資本概念について IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 2006-J-1 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 103-8660 30 http://www.imes.boj.or.jp IMES Discussion Paper Series 2006-J-1 2006 1

More information

2 Recovery Theorem Spears [2013]Audrino et al. [2015]Backwell [2015] Spears [2013] Ross [2015] Audrino et al. [2015] Recovery Theorem Tikhonov (Tikhon

2 Recovery Theorem Spears [2013]Audrino et al. [2015]Backwell [2015] Spears [2013] Ross [2015] Audrino et al. [2015] Recovery Theorem Tikhonov (Tikhon Recovery Theorem Forward Looking Recovery Theorem Ross [2015] forward looking Audrino et al. [2015] Tikhonov Tikhonov 1. Tikhonov 2. Tikhonov 3. 3 1 forward looking *1 Recovery Theorem Ross [2015] forward

More information

IMES Discussion Paper Series 98-J

IMES Discussion Paper Series 98-J IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discuss ssion Paper No. 98-J-1 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN IMES Discussion Paper Series 98-J-1 1998 1 E-mail: tokiko.shimizu@boj.or.jp 1. 1.1.

More information

日本初期貨幣研究史略 ─和同開珎と富本銭・無文銀銭の評価をめぐって─

日本初期貨幣研究史略 ─和同開珎と富本銭・無文銀銭の評価をめぐって─ IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 2004-J-14 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 103-8660 30 http://www.imes.boj.or.jp IMES Discussion Paper Series 2004-J-14 2004

More information

Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL

Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue 2012-06 Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/23085 Right Hitotsubashi University Repository

More information

商学 59‐5・6/2.丸茂

商学 59‐5・6/2.丸茂 296 1 2 3 3 2001 DNS RTGS DNS DNS DNS 1 297 DNS RTGS RTGS 1 1 RTGS 2001 DNS RTGS BIS BIS RTGS DNS 1 Freeman1996 nonoptimal equilibria of constrained liquidity 2 2000 Rochet and Tirole1996 Freeman19962006

More information

untitled

untitled 2007 2 * (i) (ii) 2006 7 1999 2 2000 8 1 (2003) Oda and Ueda (2005) 2005 Kimura and Small(2006) Iwamura, Shiratsuka and Watanabe (2006) (2006) 3 (i) (ii) (iii) 2 2 3 4 2.1 (2003) (2005) 1) (i) (ii) (i)

More information

メイン寄せリスクと貸出債権価値の評価:ゲーム論的リアルオプションによるアプローチ

メイン寄せリスクと貸出債権価値の評価:ゲーム論的リアルオプションによるアプローチ 2 i ii RIETI E-mail: tshibata@tmu.ac.jp E-mail: tetsuya.yamada@boj.or.jp / /2008.11 1 1. 2007 2 1 DCF DCF Leland [1994] Mella-Barral and Perraudin [1997] DCF DCF 2 /2008.11 1 1 3 2 Mella-Barral and Perraudin

More information

fiúŁÄ”s‘ê‡ÌŁª”U…−…X…N…v…„…~…A…•‡Ì ”s‘ê™´›ß…−…^†[…fiŠ‚ª›Âfl’«

fiúŁÄ”s‘ê‡ÌŁª”U…−…X…N…v…„…~…A…•‡Ì ”s‘ê™´›ß…−…^†[…fiŠ‚ª›Âfl’« 2016/3/11 Realized Volatility RV 1 RV 1 Implied Volatility IV Volatility Risk Premium VRP 1 (Fama and French(1988) Campbell and Shiller(1988)) (Hodrick(1992)) (Lettau and Ludvigson (2001)) VRP (Bollerslev

More information

Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) ,

Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) , ,, 2010 8 24 2010 9 14 A B C A (B Negishi(1960) (C) ( 22 3 27 ) E-mail:fujii@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:082e527e@stu.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:iritani@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp 1 1 1 2 3 Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987)

More information

アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて

アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて * ** 199 1 1996-97 relation * ** Seoul conference China and Emerging Asia: Reorganizing the Global Economy? held by KIEP and Seoul National University 26 5 11-12 Hugh Patrick Yung-Chul Park 26 9 9-1 East

More information

取引銀行の破綻が企業経営に及ぼす影響について-阪和銀行破綻の事例分析-

取引銀行の破綻が企業経営に及ぼす影響について-阪和銀行破綻の事例分析- 2 JEL Classification: G21, G14 Key words: e-mail y-murakami@aria.ocn.ne.jp 1 The Effect of Bank Failure on Client Firms A Study on the Hanwa Bank s Failure By Yoshiko Murakami Abstract The financial theories

More information

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─ q E-mail: kenji.nishizaki@boj.or.jp E-mail: kurasawa@ynu.ac.jp OECD Vives Tirole Shleifer and Vishny q %% %% % % Allen and Gale %% % Admati, Pfreiderer and Zechner Burkart, Gromb and Panunzi Cremer 1995Pagno

More information

1 CAPM: I-,,, I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- ( CAPM) I- CAPM I- 1 I- Jensen Fama-French 3 I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 1 Fama-Fr

1 CAPM: I-,,, I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- ( CAPM) I- CAPM I- 1 I- Jensen Fama-French 3 I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 1 Fama-Fr 1 CAPM: I-,,, I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- ( CAPM) I- CAPM I- 1 I- Jensen Fama-French 3 I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 1 Fama-French (FF) 3 [5] (Capital Asset Pricing Model; CAPM

More information

Title Author(s) Kobe University Repository : Kernel 流 動 性 危 機 : レパレッジとモニタリング (< 特 集 > 世 界 金 融 危 機 )(Liquidity Crisis : Leverage and Monitoring ( World Financial Crisis)) 丸 茂, 俊 彦 Citation 国 民 経 済 雑 誌,203(1):107-119

More information

, 3, 1999, 4,,

, 3, 1999, 4,, 1, 1992 2005,,, 10 2,, 1992 1998 1,,, 1998 2002 2,, 3,,, 2002, 2002 3 1 2 1 , 3, 1999, 4,, 3 14 11 2 I, 10,, 1992 2005, 2,, 3, 4,, II,, 1992 1998 1,, 1998 2002 2 2002 3 II-1: 1 1993 1998 90,, 1995 6850,,

More information

201711grade1ouyou.pdf

201711grade1ouyou.pdf 2017 11 26 1 2 52 3 12 13 22 23 32 33 42 3 5 3 4 90 5 6 A 1 2 Web Web 3 4 1 2... 5 6 7 7 44 8 9 1 2 3 1 p p >2 2 A 1 2 0.6 0.4 0.52... (a) 0.6 0.4...... B 1 2 0.8-0.2 0.52..... (b) 0.6 0.52.... 1 A B 2

More information

首都直下地震における地方財政への影響

首都直下地震における地方財政への影響 ESRI Discussion Paper Series No.241 首都直下地震における地方財政への影響 宮崎毅 August 2010 内閣府経済社会総合研究所 Economic and Social Research Institute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan ESRI ディスカッション ペーパー シリーズは 内閣府経済社会総合研究所の研究者および外部研究者によって行われた研究成果をとりまとめたものです

More information

(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008)

(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008) ,, 23 4 30 (i) (ii) (i) (ii) Negishi (1960) 2010 (2010) ( ) ( ) (2010) E-mail:fujii@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:082e527e@stu.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:iritani@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp 1 1 16 (2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987)

More information

大規模データベースを用いた信用リスク計測の問題点と対策(変数選択とデータ量の関係)

大規模データベースを用いた信用リスク計測の問題点と対策(変数選択とデータ量の関係) ( ) CRD 450,000 86 2, CRD,, CRD 1 1 4 2 5 2.1........................................ 5 2.2............................... 6 3 2 7 3.1 2.................................... 7 3.2.............................

More information

国際流動性に関する財政的側面について

国際流動性に関する財政的側面について IMF SDR IMF 2011 6 1 2 2011 E-mail: obstfeld@econ.berkeley.edu / /2011.10 35 1. 2007 2009 2 Goodhart [1999] 2010 11 2. 4 1970 IMF 1960 36 /2011.10 international reserve 1 D 35 1 D 35 1960 Eichengreen [2011]

More information

Black-Scholes [1] Nelson [2] Schrödinger 1 Black Scholes [1] Black-Scholes Nelson [2][3][4] Schrödinger Nelson Parisi Wu [5] Nelson Parisi-W

Black-Scholes [1] Nelson [2] Schrödinger 1 Black Scholes [1] Black-Scholes Nelson [2][3][4] Schrödinger Nelson Parisi Wu [5] Nelson Parisi-W 003 7 14 Black-Scholes [1] Nelson [] Schrödinger 1 Black Scholes [1] Black-Scholes Nelson [][3][4] Schrödinger Nelson Parisi Wu [5] Nelson Parisi-Wu Nelson e-mail: takatoshi-tasaki@nifty.com kabutaro@mocha.freemail.ne.jp

More information

25 7 18 1 1 1.1 v.s............................. 1 1.1.1.................................. 1 1.1.2................................. 1 1.1.3.................................. 3 1.2................... 3

More information

082_rev2_utf8.pdf

082_rev2_utf8.pdf 3 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1 3 3 3 2008 3 2008 2008 3 2008 2008, 1 5 Lo and MacKinlay (1990a) de Jong and Nijman (1997) Cohen et al. (1983) Lo and MacKinlay (1990a b) Cohen et al. (1983) de Jong and Nijman (1997)

More information

untitled

untitled 1 25/5/3-6/3 1 1 1.1.................................. 1 1.2.................................. 4 2 5 2.1.............................. 5 2.2.............................. 6 3 Black Scholes 7 3.1 BS............................

More information

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題 * takeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** kawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp *** naohiko.baba@boj.or.jp No.05-J-3 2005 3 103-8660 30 No.05-J-3 2005 3 1990 * E-mailtakeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** E-mailkawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp

More information

The Institute for Economic Studies Seijo University 6 1 20, Seijo, Setagaya Tokyo 157-8511, Japan The Institute for Economic Studies Green Paper No. 59 Consumers Decision on the Choice of Small Payment

More information

1 Jensen et al.[6] GRT S&P500 GRT RT GRT Kiriu and Hibiki[8] Jensen et al.[6] GRT 3 GRT Generalized Recovery Theorem (Jensen et al.[6])

1 Jensen et al.[6] GRT S&P500 GRT RT GRT Kiriu and Hibiki[8] Jensen et al.[6] GRT 3 GRT Generalized Recovery Theorem (Jensen et al.[6]) Generalized Recovery Theorem Ross[11] Recovery Theorem(RT) RT forward looking Kiriu and Hibiki[8] Generalized Recovery Theorem(GRT) Jensen et al.[6] GRT RT Kiriu and Hibiki[8] 1 backward looking forward

More information

JORSJ05-61_2_pdf.dvi

JORSJ05-61_2_pdf.dvi Transactions of the Operations Research Society of Japan 2007 50 42-67 2 ( 2005 9 26 ; 2006 10 9 ) 2 :,,,, 1. 2 1 Gordy & Heitfield [11] 1 2 2 1 42 43 2 3 4 5 6 5 7 2. Merton [18] Structural Zhou [27]

More information

M&A の経済分析:M&A はなぜ増加したのか

M&A の経済分析:M&A はなぜ増加したのか RIETI Discussion Paper Series 06-J-034 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 06-J-034 M&A の経済分析 :M&A はなぜ増加したのか 蟻川靖浩 宮島英昭 ( 早稲田大学 RIETI) 2006 年 4 月 要旨 1990 年代以降の M&A の急増の主要な要因は 産業や企業の成長性や収益性へのショックである とりわけ M&A を活発に行っている産業あるいは企業の特性としては

More information

1 1 1 [2000]

1 1 1 [2000] * 2000 7 26 1 1 1 [2000] 1 2 1 2 2 1 B to C 250000 億円 200000 日本米国 213,200 150000 100000 50000 0 153,600 106,900 71,100 66,620 42,700 43,860 22,500 26,940 15,340 645 3,360 7,730 1998 年 1999 年 2000 年 2001

More information

Autumn II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 分析に用いるデータ

Autumn II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 分析に用いるデータ 212 Vol. 44 No. 2 I はじめに 2008 1 2 Autumn 08 213 II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 17 18 1 分析に用いるデータ 1 2005 10 12 200 2 2006 9 12 1 1 2 129 35 113 3 1 2 6 1 2 3 4 4 1

More information

本邦株式市場の流動性に関する動学的考察―東京証券取引所のティック・データ分析―

本邦株式市場の流動性に関する動学的考察―東京証券取引所のティック・データ分析― tightnessdepth resiliency BIS Market Liquidity: Research Findings and Selected Policy Implications BISWorld Wide Web http://www.bis.org E-mail: jun.muranaga@boj.or.jp Muranaga and Shimizu O Hara Muranaga

More information

研究シリーズ第40号

研究シリーズ第40号 165 PEN WPI CPI WAGE IIP Feige and Pearce 166 167 168 169 Vector Autoregression n (z) z z p p p zt = φ1zt 1 + φ2zt 2 + + φ pzt p + t Cov( 0 ε t, ε t j )= Σ for for j 0 j = 0 Cov( ε t, zt j ) = 0 j = >

More information

中田真佐男 323‐352/323‐352

中田真佐男 323‐352/323‐352 IT FinTech Finance Technology e SNS (AI) (2013) (2015) ATM IC EMV VISA MasterJCB VISA Master (Union Pay) VISA Master JCB J-Debit J-Debit VISA IC Alipay QR POS nanaco WAON EdyJR Suica PASMO au Master au

More information

Vol. 3 No (Mar. 2010) An Option Valuation Model Based on an Asset Pricing Model Incorporating Investors Beliefs Kentaro Tanaka, 1 Koich

Vol. 3 No (Mar. 2010) An Option Valuation Model Based on an Asset Pricing Model Incorporating Investors Beliefs Kentaro Tanaka, 1 Koich Vol. 3 No. 2 51 64 (Mar. 2010 1 1 1 An Option Valuation Model Based on an Asset Pricing Model Incorporating Investors Beliefs Kentaro Tanaka, 1 Koichi Miyazaki 1 and Koji Nishiki 1 Preceding researches

More information

物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―

物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に― NAIRU NAIRU NAIRU GDPGDP NAIRUNon- Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment GDP GDP NAIRU Lown and RichFisher, Mahadeva and Whitley raw materials G NAIRUTurnerFai WatanabeNAIRU Watanabe nested NAIRU

More information

商品流動性リスクの計量化に関する一考察(その2)―内生的流動性リスクを考慮したストレス・テスト―

商品流動性リスクの計量化に関する一考察(その2)―内生的流動性リスクを考慮したストレス・テスト― E-mail: shigeru_yoshifuji@btm.co.jp E-mail: fuminobu_otake@btm.co.jp Bangia et al. G Bangia et al. exogenous liquidity risk endogenous liquidity risk et al LTCMLong Term Capital Management Fed G G T

More information

地理空間上におけるイノベーション検索システムの構築とその応用

地理空間上におけるイノベーション検索システムの構築とその応用 RIETI Policy Discussion Paper Series 13-P-023 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 13-P-023 2013 年 12 月 地理空間上におけるイノベーション検索システムの構築とその応用 相馬亘 ( 日本大学理工学部 ) 藤田裕二 ( 日本大学理工学研究所 ) 内藤祐介 ( 株式会社人工生命研究所 ) 西田正敏 ( 株式会社人工生命研究所

More information

[17]Holmström and Tirole (2000) (1) (2) (1) (2) 1 1 2

[17]Holmström and Tirole (2000) (1) (2) (1) (2) 1 1 2 2002 4 1 1990 1 525-8577 1-1-1. Tel.: 077-561-4855. Fax.: 077-561-3964. E-mail: khori@ec.ritsumei.ac.jp 1 [17]Holmström and Tirole (2000) (1) (2) (1) (2) 1 1 2 MM MM MM MM CP 0 3 1 1990 1970 2 2 1 1 17%

More information

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程 1991 2003 GDP....................................... http://www.stat.go.jp/ http://www.boj.or.jp/ GDP http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/ GDP - - - inflation targeting Krugman a IS-LM liquidity trap Krugman b Krugman

More information

本邦国債価格データを用いたゼロ・クーポン・イールド・カーブ推定手法の比較分析

本邦国債価格データを用いたゼロ・クーポン・イールド・カーブ推定手法の比較分析 Steeley [1991]... JAFEE 35 TMU NEEDS E-mail: kentarou.kikuchi@boj.or.jp / /212.7 35 1 1 1 1 2 McCulloch [1971, 1975] Steeley [1991] Tanggaard [1997] Schaefer [1981] Nelson and Siegel [1987] Svensson [1995]...

More information

untitled

untitled 2 book conference 1990 2003 14 Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 M1,M2 M1 Sekine(1998) Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 1. (1989), Yoshida and Rasche(1990), Rasche(1990), 19921997, Fujiki and Mulligan(1996),

More information

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J-17 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8630 203 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J-17 1999 6 * JEL classification E52 E58

More information

(1) (Karlan, 2004) (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1

(1) (Karlan, 2004) (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1 2004 1 8 2005 12 17 1 (1) (Karlan, 2004) 2 3 4 5 E-mail: aa37065@mail.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1 2 2 2.1 (, 1978, 7 ) (2) (1988) 38 2 (3) (4) (2) (1986) 91 (1996) 2 1 (1993) 1

More information

Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 53 動学的資本税協調と公的資本形成 あらまし Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Batina はじめに Zodr

Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 53 動学的資本税協調と公的資本形成 あらまし Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Batina はじめに Zodr Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 53 動学的資本税協調と公的資本形成 あらまし Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Batina 2009 1. はじめに Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Tax Competition

More information

村本 孜51‐85/51‐85

村本 孜51‐85/51‐85 One for all, all for one. One for all, all for one. ( One for all, all for one. ) One for all, all for one. ( One for all, all for one. ) One for all, all for one. Manes, A. (1877~1963) [2006] p. 37 Raiffisen

More information

わが国銀行業の将来像― 預金通貨需要からのアプローチによるマクロ的サイズの検討―

わが国銀行業の将来像― 預金通貨需要からのアプローチによるマクロ的サイズの検討― M1GDP M2M1 M1GDP M2M1 E-mail: kazuhiko.ishida@boj.or.jp E-mail: hitoshi.mio@boj.or.jp M2GDP Modigliani-Miller: MM Hoshi and Kashyap HKHK HK Quarterly Financial Report for Manufacturing, Mining and Trade

More information

,398 4% 017,

,398 4% 017, 6 3 JEL Classification: D4; K39; L86,,., JSPS 34304, 47301.. 1 01301 79 1 7,398 4% 017,390 01 013 1 1 01 011 514 8 1 Novos and Waldman (1984) Johnson (1985) Chen and Png (003) Arai (011) 3 1 4 3 4 5 0

More information

高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―

高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析― 196 2017 * ** ** ** ** 160 2 2 JEL Classification Codes E21, E22, J11 Keywords * ESRI 28 ESRI 29 3 17 ESRI ** 115 196 Population Aging and Domestic Investment An Analysis Using International Panel Data

More information

() ( ) ( ) (1996) (1997) (1997) EaR (Earning at Risk) VaR ( ) ( ) Memmel (214) () 2 (214) 2

() ( ) ( ) (1996) (1997) (1997) EaR (Earning at Risk) VaR ( ) ( ) Memmel (214) () 2 (214) 2 1 (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, BCBS) (BCBS(24), BCBS(215) ) *1 ( ) ( (1997) (213a,b) ) 2 *1 (214) 1 () ( ) ( ) (1996) (1997) (1997) EaR (Earning at Risk) VaR 2 1 1 ( ) ( ) Memmel (214) () 2

More information

低金利環境下でのフィット向上を目指した最近のイールド・カーブ・モデル群

低金利環境下でのフィット向上を目指した最近のイールド・カーブ・モデル群 IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES 低金利環境下でのフィット向上を目指した最近のイールド カーブ モデル群 ふじわらしげあき 藤原茂章 Discussio Paper No. 7-J- INSIUE FOR MONEARY AND ECONOMIC SUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 日本銀行金融研究所 3-866 日本橋郵便局私書箱 3 号 日本銀行金融研究所が刊行している論文等はホームページからダウンロードできます

More information

金融不安・低金利と通貨需要 「家計の金融資産に関する世論調査」を用いた分析

金融不安・低金利と通貨需要  「家計の金融資産に関する世論調査」を用いた分析 IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES 金融不安 低金利と通貨需要 家計の金融資産に関する世論調査 を用いた分析 しおじえつろう ふじきひろし 塩路悦朗 * 藤木 裕 ** Discussion Paper No. 2005-J-11 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 日本銀行金融研究所 103-8660

More information

,. Black-Scholes u t t, x c u 0 t, x x u t t, x c u t, x x u t t, x + σ x u t, x + rx ut, x rux, t 0 x x,,.,. Step 3, 7,,, Step 6., Step 4,. Step 5,,.

,. Black-Scholes u t t, x c u 0 t, x x u t t, x c u t, x x u t t, x + σ x u t, x + rx ut, x rux, t 0 x x,,.,. Step 3, 7,,, Step 6., Step 4,. Step 5,,. 9 α ν β Ξ ξ Γ γ o δ Π π ε ρ ζ Σ σ η τ Θ θ Υ υ ι Φ φ κ χ Λ λ Ψ ψ µ Ω ω Def, Prop, Th, Lem, Note, Remark, Ex,, Proof, R, N, Q, C [a, b {x R : a x b} : a, b {x R : a < x < b} : [a, b {x R : a x < b} : a,

More information

「国債の金利推定モデルに関する研究会」報告書

「国債の金利推定モデルに関する研究会」報告書 : LG 19 7 26 2 LG Quadratic Gaussian 1 30 30 3 4 2,,, E-mail: kijima@center.tmu.ac.jp, E-mail: tanaka-keiichi@tmu.ac.jp 1 L G 2 1 L G r L t),r G t) L r L t) G r G t) r L t) h G t) =r G t) r L t) r L t)

More information

, 1), 2) (Markov-Switching Vector Autoregression, MSVAR), 3) 3, ,, , TOPIX, , explosive. 2,.,,,.,, 1

, 1), 2) (Markov-Switching Vector Autoregression, MSVAR), 3) 3, ,, , TOPIX, , explosive. 2,.,,,.,, 1 2016 1 12 4 1 2016 1 12, 1), 2) (Markov-Switching Vector Autoregression, MSVAR), 3) 3, 1980 1990.,, 225 1986 4 1990 6, TOPIX,1986 5 1990 2, explosive. 2,.,,,.,, 1986 Q2 1990 Q2,,. :, explosive, recursiveadf,

More information

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8660 30 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J-45 199912 12 1986 General Agreement of Trade in Service Multilateral

More information

ワークショップ「国際財務報告基準(IFRS)と企業行動:IFRSアドプションのインパクト」の模様

ワークショップ「国際財務報告基準(IFRS)と企業行動:IFRSアドプションのインパクト」の模様 IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IFRS IFRS Discussion Paper No. 2010-J-25 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 103-8660 2-1-1 http://www.imes.boj.or.jp IMES Discussion Paper Series 2010-J-25

More information

6) 7) MBO management buy-out 2 necessity sufficiency ) 21

6) 7) MBO management buy-out 2 necessity sufficiency ) 21 1) 1997 15 02 03 751 1998 8 9 04 1996 16.1% 17.5% 26.9% 64.9% 63.3% 48.9% 2) 02 54.8% 59.0% 61.8% 78.6% 46.5% 1996 17.8% 19.9% 18.7% 42% 11.9% 3) 4) 01 3 1 3 2 03 04 1 TCL 5) Vol. 52, No. 4, October 06

More information

chap10.dvi

chap10.dvi . q {y j } I( ( L y j =Δy j = u j = C l ε j l = C(L ε j, {ε j } i.i.d.(,i q ( l= y O p ( {u j } q {C l } A l C l

More information

24 [11] [4, 8, 10, 20, 21] CreditMetrics [8] CreditMetrics CreditMetrics CreditMetrics [13] [1, 12, 16, 17] [12] [1] Conditional Value-at-Risk C

24 [11] [4, 8, 10, 20, 21] CreditMetrics [8] CreditMetrics CreditMetrics CreditMetrics [13] [1, 12, 16, 17] [12] [1] Conditional Value-at-Risk C Transactions of the Operations Research Society of Japan Vol. 54, 2011, pp. 23 42 c CVaR 1 FT ( 2009 2 12 ; 2010 10 26 ) Conditional Value-at-Risk 10 7 50 35 : Conditional Value-at-Risk 1. BIS [3] structuralreduced

More information

坪沼

坪沼 2003 2006 M&A 2006 5 2007 5 TOB TOB TOB TOB 2006 12 TOB Grossman-Hart 1980 TOB free-rider TOB TOB TOB TOB TOB TOB free-rider Grossman-Hart 1980 dilution TOB pressure-to-tender Burkart-Gromb-Panunzi 1998

More information

2 G(k) e ikx = (ik) n x n n! n=0 (k ) ( ) X n = ( i) n n k n G(k) k=0 F (k) ln G(k) = ln e ikx n κ n F (k) = F (k) (ik) n n= n! κ n κ n = ( i) n n k n

2 G(k) e ikx = (ik) n x n n! n=0 (k ) ( ) X n = ( i) n n k n G(k) k=0 F (k) ln G(k) = ln e ikx n κ n F (k) = F (k) (ik) n n= n! κ n κ n = ( i) n n k n . X {x, x 2, x 3,... x n } X X {, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} X x i P i. 0 P i 2. n P i = 3. P (i ω) = i ω P i P 3 {x, x 2, x 3,... x n } ω P i = 6 X f(x) f(x) X n n f(x i )P i n x n i P i X n 2 G(k) e ikx = (ik) n

More information

1 1.1 Merton (1974) Black and Cox (1976) PD Probability of Default LGD Loss Given Default 1 EAD Exposure At Default II Merton (1974) Merton Merton Ges

1 1.1 Merton (1974) Black and Cox (1976) PD Probability of Default LGD Loss Given Default 1 EAD Exposure At Default II Merton (1974) Merton Merton Ges II 2 :,,,,. CRD ed061001@srv.cc.hit-u.ac.jp yamasita@ism.ac.jp 1 1 1.1 Merton (1974) Black and Cox (1976) PD Probability of Default LGD Loss Given Default 1 EAD Exposure At Default II Merton (1974) Merton

More information

, Exchange & Finamce

, Exchange & Finamce 10 35 50 10 20 1210 18 15 15, 7.5 10 13 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 1225 7.5 10 1.3 10 6.8 5.5 142 25 Exchange & Finamce 1210 10 2.75 2.5 2.5 1210 10 12 1.5 10 10 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.2 1.5 1.5 10 1.4 1.3 1.3 10 12,900

More information

非上場企業におけるコーポレート・ガバナンス

非上場企業におけるコーポレート・ガバナンス * sfukuda@e.u-tokyo.ac.jp ** munehisa.kasuya@boj.or.jp *** No. 06-J-05 2006 3 103-8660 30 * ** *** 1 10 TFP 1 1 La Porta, Lopez-De-Silanes, and Shleifer (1999) OECD27 20 20 10 2 1 Lichtenberg and Pushner

More information

GDPギャップと潜在成長率

GDPギャップと潜在成長率 2003 output gap 80 1 20 90 20 70 2 1 2 output gap potential output 1 2 (2001) 3 potential rate of growth 2000 Meyer (2000) European Central Bank: (1999b) 2002 10 4 3 (2000) 4 4 () 5 5 5 6 () () 7 Total

More information

I- Fama-French 3, Idiosyncratic (I- ) I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- 1 I- I- Jensen Fama-French 3 SMB-FL, HML-FL I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth Fama-MacBeth I- S

I- Fama-French 3, Idiosyncratic (I- ) I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- 1 I- I- Jensen Fama-French 3 SMB-FL, HML-FL I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth Fama-MacBeth I- S I- Fama-French 3, Idiosyncratic (I- ) I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- 1 I- I- Jensen Fama-French 3 SMB-FL, HML-FL I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 2, 3, 5 I- HML-FL 1 Fama-French

More information

headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart s

headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart s CJEB The financial strategies of Japanese multinational enterprises and internal capital market, Columbia Business School, CJEB, Working Paper No., April,. headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart

More information

03.™ƒ−ÔŁñ“’

03.™ƒ−ÔŁñ“’ BIS BIS, Implications for Central Banks of the Development of Electronic Money, 1996. IC IC IC BC BA IC IC ATM ATM BIS POS IC IC ICICIC ECOM ECOM face-to-face IC Berger, A. N., D. Hancock, and J. C.

More information

時間割引:双曲割引と弱加法性

時間割引:双曲割引と弱加法性 Discussion aper No. 666 June 2006 The Institute of Social and Economic Research Osaka University 6-1 Mihogaoka, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047, Japan Time Discounting: Declining Impatience and Interval Effect

More information

Public Pension and Immigration The Effects of Immigration on Welfare Inequality The immigration of unskilled workers has been analyzed by a considerab

Public Pension and Immigration The Effects of Immigration on Welfare Inequality The immigration of unskilled workers has been analyzed by a considerab Public Pension and Immigration The Effects of Immigration on Welfare Inequality The immigration of unskilled workers has been analyzed by a considerable amount of research, which has noted an ability distribution.

More information

mf.dvi

mf.dvi 21 9 29 1 2 3....................................... 3 :......................... 3....................................... 4................................ 4..................................... 5................................

More information

gr09.dvi

gr09.dvi .1, θ, ϕ d = A, t dt + B, t dtd + C, t d + D, t dθ +in θdϕ.1.1 t { = f1,t t = f,t { D, t = B, t =.1. t A, tdt e φ,t dt, C, td e λ,t d.1.3,t, t d = e φ,t dt + e λ,t d + dθ +in θdϕ.1.4 { = f1,t t = f,t {

More information

Tomorrow Next th draft version MEW SWET

Tomorrow Next th draft version MEW SWET Research Center for Price Dynamics A Research Project Concerning Prices and Household Behaviors Based on Micro Transaction Data Working Paper Series No.7 Tomorrow Next を用いた金融政策の分析 青野幸平 June 14, 2012 4th

More information

戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成:最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務

戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成:最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務 1930 Modigliani and Miller [1958] 170 1930 2008 7 16 I E-mail: takashi.nanjou@boj.or.jp E-mail: cc00881@srv.cc.hit-u.ac.jp //2009.7 81 1. 1 2 M&A 3 4 1965 1969 1995 1995 1993 1 2008 2008 1985 2006 10 ROA

More information

01.Œk’ì/“²fi¡*

01.Œk’ì/“²fi¡* AIC AIC y n r n = logy n = logy n logy n ARCHEngle r n = σ n w n logσ n 2 = α + β w n 2 () r n = σ n w n logσ n 2 = α + β logσ n 2 + v n (2) w n r n logr n 2 = logσ n 2 + logw n 2 logσ n 2 = α +β logσ

More information

,.,.,,. [15],.,.,,., 2003 3 2006 2 3. 2003 3 2004 2 2004 3 2005 2, 1., 2005 3 2006 2, 1., 1,., 1,,., 1. i

,.,.,,. [15],.,.,,., 2003 3 2006 2 3. 2003 3 2004 2 2004 3 2005 2, 1., 2005 3 2006 2, 1., 1,., 1,,., 1. i 200520866 ( ) 19 1 ,.,.,,. [15],.,.,,., 2003 3 2006 2 3. 2003 3 2004 2 2004 3 2005 2, 1., 2005 3 2006 2, 1., 1,., 1,,., 1. i 1 1 1.1..................................... 1 1.2...................................

More information

y = x x R = 0. 9, R = σ $ = y x w = x y x x w = x y α ε = + β + x x x y α ε = + β + γ x + x x x x' = / x y' = y/ x y' =

y = x x R = 0. 9, R = σ $ = y x w = x y x x w = x y α ε = + β + x x x y α ε = + β + γ x + x x x x' = / x y' = y/ x y' = y x = α + β + ε =,, ε V( ε) = E( ε ) = σ α $ $ β w ( 0) σ = w σ σ y α x ε = + β + w w w w ε / w ( w y x α β ) = α$ $ W = yw βwxw $β = W ( W) ( W)( W) w x x w x x y y = = x W y W x y x y xw = y W = w w

More information

わが国企業による株主還元策の決定要因:配当・自社株消却のインセンティブを巡る実証分析

わが国企業による株主還元策の決定要因:配当・自社株消却のインセンティブを巡る実証分析 * youichi.ueno@boj.or.jp ** naohiko.baba@boj.or.jp No.05-J-6 2005 4 103-8660 30 No.05-J-6 2005 4 * ** 1990 1 2 1990 * E-mailyouichi.ueno@boj.or.jp ** E-mailnaohiko.baba@boj.or.jp 1 1990 1 1990 1 [2004]

More information

自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書

自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書 17 1 2 3 4 5 11 16 30,247 17 18 21,024 +2.0 6 12 13 WHO 100 14 7 15 2 5 8 16 9 10 17 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 II I 18 Durkheim(1897) Hamermesh&Soss(1974)Dixit&Pindyck(1994) Becker&Posner(2004) Rosenthal(1993)

More information

CDOのプライシング・モデルとそれを用いたCDOの特性等の考察: CDOの商品性、国内市場の概説とともに

CDOのプライシング・モデルとそれを用いたCDOの特性等の考察: CDOの商品性、国内市場の概説とともに CDO CDO CDO CDO CDO CDO E-mail: kiyotaka_komiya@btm.co.jp CDOcollateralized debt obligation CDO CDO CDO CDO CDOCDO CDO CDO CDO CDOCDO CDO CDO CDO CDO CDO CDOABSasset backed securities CBOcollateralized

More information