橡超弦理論はブラックホールの謎を解けるか？

D-brane K 1, 2 ( ) 1 K D-brane K K D-brane Witten [1] D-brane K K K K D-brane D-brane K RR BPS D-brane

D-brane K 1, 2 E-mail: sugimoto@yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp (2004 12 16 ) 1 K D-brane K K D-brane Witten [1] D-brane K K K K D-brane D-brane K RR BPS D-brane D-brane RR D-brane K D-brane K D-brane K K [2, 3]

YITP50.dvi

1 70 80 90 50 2 3 3 84 first revolution 4 94 second revolution 5 6 2 1: 1 3 consistent 1-loop Feynman 1-loop Feynman loop loop loop Feynman 2 3 2: 1-loop Feynman loop 3 cycle 4 = 3: 4: 4 cycle loop Feynman

ssastro2016_shiromizu

26 th July 2016 / 1991(M1)-1995(D3), 2005( ) 26 th July 2016 / 1. 2. 3. 4. . ( ) 1960-70 1963 Kerr 1965 BH Penrose 1967 Hawking BH Israel 1971 (Carter)-75(Robinson) BH 1972 BH theorem(,, ) Hawk 1975 Hawking

Bose-Einstein Hawking Hawking Hawking Hawking nk Hawking Bose-Einstein Hawking 1 Bekenstein[1] Hawking 1974 [2,

Bose-Einstein Hawking E-mail: moinai@yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp Hawking Hawking Hawking nk Hawking Bose-Einstein Hawking 1 Bekenstein[1] Hawking 1974 [2, 3] Hawking Hawking 6nK Hawking Hawking 3K Hawking Hawking

“‡”�„³…u…›…b…N…z†[…‰

2009 8 31 / 4 : : Outline 4 G MN T t g x mu... g µν = G MN X M x µ X N x ν X G MN c.f., : X 5, X 6,... g µν : : g µν, A µ : R µν 1 2 Rg µν = 8πGT µν : G MN : R MN 1 2 RG MN = 0 ( ) Kaluza-Klein G MN =

untitled

Abstract Black Hole Black Hole Λ 1 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Prelude : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 4 1.2 History : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

The World's No.1 Science & Technology News Service Hawking cracks black hole paradox 19:00 14 July 04 Exclusive from New Scientist Print Edition. Subs

2004 AUG 6 1 The World's No.1 Science & Technology News Service Hawking cracks black hole paradox 19:00 14 July 04 Exclusive from New Scientist Print Edition. Subscribe and get 4 free issues. Hawking concedes

一般相対性理論に関するリーマン計量の変形について

1896 2014 137-149 137 ( ) 1 $(N^{4}, g)$ $N$ 4 $g$ $(3, 1)$ $R_{ab}- \frac{1}{2}rg_{ab}=t_{ab}$ (1) $R_{ab}$ $g$ $R$ $g$ ( ) $T_{ab}$ $T$ $R_{ab}- \frac{1}{2}rg_{ab}=0$ 4 $R_{ab}=0$ $\mathbb{r}^{3,1}$

QCD 1 QCD GeV 2014 QCD 2015 QCD SU(3) QCD A µ g µν QCD 1

QCD 1 QCD GeV 2014 QCD 2015 QCD SU(3) QCD A µ g µν QCD 1 (vierbein) QCD QCD 1 1: QCD QCD Γ ρ µν A µ R σ µνρ F µν g µν A µ Lagrangian gr TrFµν F µν No. Yes. Yes. No. No! Yes! [1] Nash & Sen [2] Riemann

1: Sheldon L. Glashow (Ouroboros) [1] 1 v(r) u(r, r ) ( e 2 / r r ) H 2 [2] H = ( dr ψ σ + (r) 1 2 ) σ 2m r 2 + v(r) µ ψ σ (r) + 1 dr dr ψ σ + (r)ψ +

1 1.1 21 11 22 10 33 cm 10 29 cm 60 6 8 10 12 cm 1cm 1 1.2 2 1 1 1: Sheldon L. Glashow (Ouroboros) [1] 1 v(r) u(r, r ) ( e 2 / r r ) H 2 [2] H = ( dr ψ σ + (r) 1 2 ) σ 2m r 2 + v(r) µ ψ σ (r) + 1 dr dr

3 3.1 R r r + R R r Rr [ ] ˆn(r) = ˆn(r + R) (3.1) R R = r ˆn(r) = ˆn(0) r 0 R = r C nn (r, r ) = C nn (r + R, r + R) = C nn (r r, 0) (3.2) ( 2.2 ) C

3 3.1 R r r + R R r Rr [ ] ˆn(r) = ˆn(r + R) (3.1) R R = r ˆn(r) = ˆn(0) r 0 R = r C nn (r, r ) = C nn (r + R, r + R) = C nn (r r, 0) (3.2) ( 2.2 ) C nn (r r ) = C nn (R(r r )) [2 ] 2 g(r, r ) ˆn(r) ˆn(r

Λ(1405) supported by Global Center of Excellence Program Nanoscience and Quantum Physics 2009, Aug. 5th 1

Λ(1405) supported by Global Center of Excellence Program Nanoscience and Quantum Physics 2009, Aug. 5th 1 S KN Λ(1405) Λ(1405) CDD Nc 2 L = q(i/ m)q P L = 1 2 (1 γ 5), P R = 1 2 (1 + γ 5), q L P L q, q

1 2 LDA Local Density Approximation 2 LDA 1 LDA LDA N N N H = N [ 2 j + V ion (r j ) ] + 1 e 2 2 r j r k j j k (3) V ion V ion (r) = I Z I e 2 r

11 March 2005 1 [ { } ] 3 1/3 2 + V ion (r) + V H (r) 3α 4π ρ σ(r) ϕ iσ (r) = ε iσ ϕ iσ (r) (1) KS Kohn-Sham [ 2 + V ion (r) + V H (r) + V σ xc(r) ] ϕ iσ (r) = ε iσ ϕ iσ (r) (2) 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 LDA Local

Einstein ( ) YITP

Einstein ( ) 2013 8 21 YITP 0. massivegravity Massive spin 2 field theory Fierz-Pauli (FP ) Kinetic term L (2) EH = 1 2 [ λh µν λ h µν λ h λ h 2 µ h µλ ν h νλ + 2 µ h µλ λ h], (1) Mass term FP L mass =

( ) ( ) 1729 (, 2016:17) = = (1) 1 1

1729 1 2016 10 28 1 1729 1111 1111 1729 (1887 1920) (1877 1947) 1729 (, 2016:17) 12 3 1728 9 3 729 1729 = 12 3 + 1 3 = 10 3 + 9 3 (1) 1 1 2 1729 1729 19 13 7 = 1729 = 12 3 + 1 3 = 10 3 + 9 3 13 7 = 91

D.dvi

2005 3 3 1 7 1.1... 7 1.2 Brane... 8 1.3 AdS/CFT black hole... 9 1.4... 10 2 11 2.1 Kaluza-Klein... 11 2.1.1 Kazula-Klein 4... 11 2.1.2 Kaluza-Klein... 13 2.2 Brane... 14 2.2.1 Brane 4... 14 2.2.2 Bulk

1/2 ( ) 1 * 1 2/3 *2 up charm top -1/3 down strange bottom 6 (ν e, ν µ, ν τ ) -1 (e) (µ) (τ) 6 ( 2 ) 6 6 I II III u d ν e e c s ν µ µ t b ν τ τ (2a) (

August 26, 2005 1 1 1.1...................................... 1 1.2......................... 4 1.3....................... 5 1.4.............. 7 1.5.................... 8 1.6 GIM..........................

[3] 2 2

(Akio HOSOYA) 2-12-1 Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology 2-12-1 Oh-Okayama, Meguro, Tokyo 152-8551 2011 9 27 1 2 9 = 18 9 9 = 81 3 9 = 27 8 9 = 72 [1] [2] email: ahosoya@th.phys.titech.ac.jp

6 2 T γ T B (6.4) (6.1) [( d nm + 3 ] 2 nt B )a 3 + nt B da 3 = 0 (6.9) na 3 = T B V 3/2 = T B V γ 1 = const. or T B a 2 = const. (6.10) H 2 = 8π kc2

1 6 6.1 (??) (P = ρ rad /3) ρ rad T 4 d(ρv ) + PdV = 0 (6.1) dρ rad ρ rad + 4 da a = 0 (6.2) dt T + da a = 0 T 1 a (6.3) ( ) n ρ m = n (m + 12 ) m v2 = n (m + 32 ) T, P = nt (6.4) (6.1) d [(nm + 32 ] )a

( ) ) ) ) 5) 1 J = σe 2 6) ) 9) 1955 Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes )

( 3 7 4 ) 2 2 ) 8 2 954 2) 955 3) 5) J = σe 2 6) 955 7) 9) 955 Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes 957 ) 3 4 2 A B H (t) = Ae iωt B(t) = B(ω)e iωt B(ω) = [ Φ R (ω) Φ R () ] iω Φ R (t)

E 1/2 3/ () +3/2 +3/ () +1/2 +1/ / E [1] B (3.2) F E 4.1 y x E = (E x,, ) j y 4.1 E int = (, E y, ) j y = (Hall ef

4 213 5 8 4.1.1 () f A exp( E/k B ) f E = A [ k B exp E ] = f k B k B = f (2 E /3n). 1 k B /2 σ = e 2 τ(e)d(e) 2E 3nf 3m 2 E de = ne2 τ E m (4.1) E E τ E = τe E = / τ(e)e 3/2 f de E 3/2 f de (4.2) f (3.2)

Gmech08.dvi

51 5 5.1 5.1.1 P r P z θ P P P z e r e, z ) r, θ, ) 5.1 z r e θ,, z r, θ, = r sin θ cos = r sin θ sin 5.1) e θ e z = r cos θ r, θ, 5.1: 0 r

8 (2006 ) X ( ) 1. X X X 2. ( ) ( ) ( 1) X (a) (b) 1: (a) (b)

8 (2006 ) X ( ) 1. X X X 2. ( ) ( ) ( 1) X (a) (b) 1: (a) (b) X hkl 2θ ω 000 2: ω X 2θ X 3: X 2 X ω X 2θ X θ-2θ X X 2-1. ( ) ( 3) X 2θ ω 4 Si GaAs Si/Si GaAs/GaAs X 2θ : 2 2θ 000 ω 000 ω ω = θ 4: 2θ ω

1. z dr er r sinθ dϕ eϕ r dθ eθ dr θ dr dθ r x 0 ϕ r sinθ dϕ r sinθ dϕ y dr dr er r dθ eθ r sinθ dϕ eϕ 2. (r, θ, φ) 2 dr 1 h r dr 1 e r h θ dθ 1 e θ h

IB IIA 1 1 r, θ, φ 1 (r, θ, φ)., r, θ, φ 0 r

C O N T E N T S 1

2014 Vol.107 C O N T E N T S 1 Communications 3 Vol.107 2 3 Communications Vol.107 4 5 Communications 7 6 Vol.107 6 7 Communications Vol.107 8 9 Communications Vol.107 10 11 Communications Vol.107 12 13

Hilbert, von Neuman [1, p.86] kt 2 1 [1, 2] 2 2

hara@math.kyushu-u.ac.jp 1 1 1.1............................................... 2 1.2............................................. 3 2 3 3 5 3.1............................................. 6 3.2...................................

4 2 Rutherford 89 Rydberg λ = R ( n 2 ) n 2 n = n +,n +2, n = Lyman n =2 Balmer n =3 Paschen R Rydberg R = cm 896 Zeeman Zeeman Zeeman Lorentz

2 Rutherford 2. Rutherford N. Bohr Rutherford 859 Kirchhoff Bunsen 86 Maxwell Maxwell 885 Balmer λ Balmer λ = 364.56 n 2 n 2 4 Lyman, Paschen 3 nm, n =3, 4, 5, 4 2 Rutherford 89 Rydberg λ = R ( n 2 ) n

φ 4 Minimal subtraction scheme 2-loop ε 2008 (University of Tokyo) (Atsuo Kuniba) version 21/Apr/ Formulas Γ( n + ɛ) = ( 1)n (1 n! ɛ + ψ(n + 1)

φ 4 Minimal subtraction scheme 2-loop ε 28 University of Tokyo Atsuo Kuniba version 2/Apr/28 Formulas Γ n + ɛ = n n! ɛ + ψn + + Oɛ n =,, 2, ψn + = + 2 + + γ, 2 n ψ = γ =.5772... Euler const, log + ax x

5 5.1 E 1, E 2 N 1, N 2 E tot N tot E tot = E 1 + E 2, N tot = N 1 + N 2 S 1 (E 1, N 1 ), S 2 (E 2, N 2 ) E 1, E 2 S tot = S 1 + S 2 2 S 1 E 1 = S 2 E

5 5.1 E 1, E 2 N 1, N 2 E tot N tot E tot = E 1 + E 2, N tot = N 1 + N 2 S 1 (E 1, N 1 ), S 2 (E 2, N 2 ) E 1, E 2 S tot = S 1 + S 2 2 S 1 E 1 = S 2 E 2, S 1 N 1 = S 2 N 2 2 (chemical potential) µ S N

1 (Berry,1975) 2-6 p (S πr 2 )p πr 2 p 2πRγ p p = 2γ R (2.5).1-1 : : : : ( ).2 α, β α, β () X S = X X α X β (.1) 1 2

2005 9/8-11 2 2.2 ( 2-5) γ ( ) γ cos θ 2πr πρhr 2 g h = 2γ cos θ ρgr (2.1) γ = ρgrh (2.2) 2 cos θ θ cos θ = 1 (2.2) γ = 1 ρgrh (2.) 2 2. p p ρgh p ( ) p p = p ρgh (2.) h p p = 2γ r 1 1 (Berry,1975) 2-6

cp57_h1_0312_n

* 1 1 (i) (ii) Brückner-Hartree-Fock (iii) (HF, BCS, HFB) (iv) (TDHF,TDHFB) (RPA) (QRPA) (v) (vi) *

* 1 1 (i) (ii) Brückner-Hartree-Fock (iii) (HF, BCS, HFB) (iv) (TDHF,TDHFB) (RPA) (QRPA) (v) (vi) *1 2004 1 1 ( ) ( ) 1.1 140 MeV 1.2 ( ) ( ) 1.3 2.6 10 8 s 7.6 10 17 s? Λ 2.5 10 10 s 6 10 24 s 1.4 ( m

(Maldacena) ads/cft

SGC - 90 100 1998 (Maldacena) ads/cft 100 2011 4 1 2012 3 1) μ, ν 2) i i, j, k 3) a h a,,h 1.6 4) μ μ = / x μ 5) μ 6) g μν (, +, +, +, ) g μν 7) Γ α μν Γμν α = 1 2 gαβ ( μ g βν + ν g βμ β g μν ) 8) R μναβ

Gmech08.dvi

145 13 13.1 13.1.1 0 m mg S 13.1 F 13.1 F /m S F F 13.1 F mg S F F mg 13.1: m d2 r 2 = F + F = 0 (13.1) 146 13 F = F (13.2) S S S S S P r S P r r = r 0 + r (13.3) r 0 S S m d2 r 2 = F (13.4) (13.3) d 2

a L = Ψ éiγ c pa qaa mc ù êë ( - )- úû Ψ 1 Ψ 4 γ a a 0, 1,, 3 {γ a, γ b } η ab æi O ö æo ö β, σ = ço I α = è - ø çèσ O ø γ 0 x iβ γ i x iβα i

解説 4 matsuo.mamoru jaea.go.jp 4 eizi imr.tohoku.ac.jp 4 maekawa.sadamichi jaea.go.jp i ii iii i Gd Tb Dy g khz Pt ii iii Keywords vierbein 3 dreibein 4 vielbein torsion JST-ERATO 1 017 1. 1..1 a L = Ψ

液晶の物理１：連続体理論（弾性，粘性）

The Physics of Liquid Crystals P. G. de Gennes and J. Prost (Oxford University Press, 1993) Liquid crystals are beautiful and mysterious; I am fond of them for both reasons. My hope is that some readers

1

http://www.is.oit.ac.jp/~shinkai/ 1 2 3 一般相対性理論 重力場の方程式 1916 空間の曲がりがモノの運動を決める アインシュタイン曲率テンソル 空間の歪み モノがあると空間が曲がる エネルギー運動量テンソル モノの分布 4 一般相対性理論 重力場の方程式 1916 空間の曲がりがモノの運動を決める モノがあると空間が曲がる 定常的な宇宙モデルをつくるために

1 2 2 (Dielecrics) Maxwell ( ) D H

2003.02.13 1 2 2 (Dielecrics) 4 2.1... 4 2.2... 5 2.3... 6 2.4... 6 3 Maxwell ( ) 9 3.1... 9 3.2 D H... 11 3.3... 13 4 14 4.1... 14 4.2... 14 4.3... 17 4.4... 19 5 22 6 THz 24 6.1... 24 6.2... 25 7 26

LLG-R8.Nisus.pdf

d M d t = γ M H + α M d M d t M γ [ 1/ ( Oe sec) ] α γ γ = gµ B h g g µ B h / π γ g = γ = 1.76 10 [ 7 1/ ( Oe sec) ] α α = λ γ λ λ λ α γ α α H α = γ H ω ω H α α H K K H K / M 1 1 > 0 α 1 M > 0 γ α γ =

4. ϵ(ν, T ) = c 4 u(ν, T ) ϵ(ν, T ) T ν π4 Planck dx = 0 e x 1 15 U(T ) x 3 U(T ) = σt 4 Stefan-Boltzmann σ 2π5 k 4 15c 2 h 3 = W m 2 K 4 5.

A 1. Boltzmann Planck u(ν, T )dν = 8πh ν 3 c 3 kt 1 dν h 6.63 10 34 J s Planck k 1.38 10 23 J K 1 Boltzmann u(ν, T ) T ν e hν c = 3 10 8 m s 1 2. Planck λ = c/ν Rayleigh-Jeans u(ν, T )dν = 8πν2 kt dν c

1 (Contents) (1) Beginning of the Universe, Dark Energy and Dark Matter Noboru NAKANISHI 2 2. Problem of Heat Exchanger (1) Kenji

8 4 2018 6 2018 6 7 1 (Contents) 1. 2 2. (1) 22 3. 31 1. Beginning of the Universe, Dark Energy and Dark Matter Noboru NAKANISHI 2 2. Problem of Heat Exchanger (1) Kenji SETO 22 3. Editorial Comments Tadashi

BH BH BH BH Typeset by FoilTEX 2

GR BH BH 2015.10.10 BH at 2015.09.07 NICT 2015.05.26 Typeset by FoilTEX 1 BH BH BH BH Typeset by FoilTEX 2 1. BH 1.1 1 Typeset by FoilTEX 3 1.2 2 A B A B t = 0 A: m a [kg] B: m b [kg] t = t f star free

I ( ) 1 de Broglie 1 (de Broglie) p λ k h Planck ( Js) p = h λ = k (1) h 2π : Dirac k B Boltzmann ( J/K) T U = 3 2 k BT

I (008 4 0 de Broglie (de Broglie p λ k h Planck ( 6.63 0 34 Js p = h λ = k ( h π : Dirac k B Boltzmann (.38 0 3 J/K T U = 3 k BT ( = λ m k B T h m = 0.067m 0 m 0 = 9. 0 3 kg GaAs( a T = 300 K 3 fg 07345

広報1505月号.indd

untitled

kougiroku7_26.dvi

2005 : D-brane tachyon : ( ) 2005 8 7 8 :,,,,,,, 1 2 1.1 Introduction............................... 2 1.2......................... 6 1.3 Second Revolution (1994 )................... 11 2 Type II 26 2.1

A

A04-164 2008 2 13 1 4 1.1.......................................... 4 1.2..................................... 4 1.3..................................... 4 1.4..................................... 5 2

講義ノート 物性研究 電子版 Vol.3 No.1, (2013 年 T c µ T c Kammerlingh Onnes 77K ρ 5.8µΩcm 4.2K ρ 10 4 µωcm σ 77K ρ 4.2K σ σ = ne 2 τ/m τ 77K

2 2 T c µ T c 1 1.1 1911 Kammerlingh Onnes 77K ρ 5.8µΩcm 4.2K ρ 1 4 µωcm σ 77K ρ 4.2K σ σ = ne 2 τ/m τ 77K τ 4.2K σ 58 213 email:takada@issp.u-tokyo.ac.jp 1933 Meissner Ochsenfeld λ = 1 5 cm B = χ B =

中央大学セミナー.ppt

String Gas Cosmology References Brandenberger & Vafa, Superstrings in the early universe, Nucl.Phys.B316(1988) 391. Tseytlin & Vafa, Elements of string cosmology, Nucl.Phys.B372 (1992) 443. Brandenberger,

Feynman Encounter with Mathematics 52, [1] N. Kumano-go, Feynman path integrals as analysis on path space by time slicing approximation. Bull

Feynman Encounter with Mathematics 52, 200 9 [] N. Kumano-go, Feynman path integrals as analysis on path space by time slicing approximation. Bull. Sci. Math. vol. 28 (2004) 97 25. [2] D. Fujiwara and

QMI13a.dvi

I (2013 (MAEDA, Atsutaka) 25 10 15 [ I I [] ( ) 0. (a) (b) Plank Compton de Broglie Bohr 1. (a) Einstein- de Broglie (b) (c) 1 (d) 2. Schrödinger (a) Schrödinger (b) Schrödinger (c) (d) 3. (a) (b) (c)

ADM-Hamiltonian Cheeger-Gromov 3. Penrose

ADM-Hamiltonian 1. 2. Cheeger-Gromov 3. Penrose 0. ADM-Hamiltonian (M 4, h) Einstein-Hilbert M 4 R h hdx L h = R h h δl h = 0 (Ric h ) αβ 1 2 R hg αβ = 0 (Σ 3, g ij ) (M 4, h ij ) g ij, k ij Σ π ij = g(k

II

II 28 5 31 3 I 5 1 7 1.1.......................... 7 1.1.1 ( )................ 7 1.1.2........................ 12 1.1.3................... 13 1.1.4 ( )................. 14 1.1.5................... 15

V(x) m e V 0 cos x π x π V(x) = x < π, x > π V 0 (i) x = 0 (V(x) V 0 (1 x 2 /2)) n n d 2 f dξ 2ξ d f 2 dξ + 2n f = 0 H n (ξ) (ii) H

199 1 1 199 1 1. Vx) m e V cos x π x π Vx) = x < π, x > π V i) x = Vx) V 1 x /)) n n d f dξ ξ d f dξ + n f = H n ξ) ii) H n ξ) = 1) n expξ ) dn dξ n exp ξ )) H n ξ)h m ξ) exp ξ )dξ = π n n!δ n,m x = Vx)

総研大恒星進化概要.dvi

The Structure and Evolution of Stars I. Basic Equations. M r r =4πr2 ρ () P r = GM rρ. r 2 (2) r: M r : P and ρ: G: M r Lagrange r = M r 4πr 2 rho ( ) P = GM r M r 4πr. 4 (2 ) s(ρ, P ) s(ρ, P ) r L r T

Note5.dvi

12 2011 7 4 2.2.2 Feynman ( ) S M N S M + N S Ai Ao t ij (i Ai, j Ao) N M G = 2e2 t ij 2 (8.28) h i μ 1 μ 2 J 12 J 12 / μ 2 μ 1 (8.28) S S (8.28) (8.28) 2 ( ) (collapse) j 12-1 2.3 2.3.1 Onsager S B S(B)

2 (March 13, 2010) N Λ a = i,j=1 x i ( d (a) i,j x j ), Λ h = N i,j=1 x i ( d (h) i,j x j ) B a B h B a = N i,j=1 ν i d (a) i,j, B h = x j N i,j=1 ν i

1. A. M. Turing [18] 60 Turing A. Gierer H. Meinhardt [1] : (GM) ) a t = D a a xx µa + ρ (c a2 h + ρ 0 (0 < x < l, t > 0) h t = D h h xx νh + c ρ a 2 (0 < x < l, t > 0) a x = h x = 0 (x = 0, l) a = a(x,

Yang-Mills Yang-Mills Yang-Mills 50 operator formalism operator formalism 1 I The Dawning of Gauge T

Yang-Mills 50 E-mail: kugo@yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp 2004 Yang-Mills 50 2004 Yang-Mills 50 operator formalism operator formalism 1 I The Dawning of Gauge Theory O Raifeartaigh [1] I, II, III O Raifeartaigh

I ( ) 2019

I ( ) 2019 i 1 I,, III,, 1,,,, III,,,, (1 ) (,,, ), :...,, : NHK... NHK, (YouTube ),!!, manaba http://pen.envr.tsukuba.ac.jp/lec/physics/,, Richard Feynman Lectures on Physics Addison-Wesley,,,, x χ,

SUSY DWs

@ 2013 1 25 Supersymmetric Domain Walls Eric A. Bergshoeff, Axel Kleinschmidt, and Fabio Riccioni Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 085043 (arxiv:1206.5697) ( ) Contents 1 2 SUSY Domain Walls Wess-Zumino Embedding

.2 ρ dv dt = ρk grad p + 3 η grad (divv) + η 2 v.3 divh = 0, rote + c H t = 0 dive = ρ, H = 0, E = ρ, roth c E t = c ρv E + H c t = 0 H c E t = c ρv T

NHK 204 2 0 203 2 24 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 25 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 26 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 27 ( ) 7 00 7 50 I. ( ν R n 2 ) m 2 n m, R = e 2 8πε 0 hca B =.09737 0 7 m ( ν = ) λ a B = 4πε 0ħ 2 m e e 2 = 5.2977

D 2009 A * 1 ( ) *1 ( ) 0 1 1 6 2 32 2.1............................................. 32 2.2.................................. 41 2.3...................................... 47 3 65 3.1..............................................

b.dvi

, 0 1 2 1.1 [2, 3] : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 3 2, 6 2.1 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 7 2.2 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 15 2.3, : : : : 18 3 23 4 31 5 35 6 46 6.1 Borel. : : : : : : : :

反D中間子と核子のエキゾチックな 束縛状態と散乱状態の解析

.... D 1 in collaboration with 1, 2, 1 RCNP 1, KEK 2 . Exotic hadron qqq q q Θ + Λ(1405) etc. uudd s? KN quasi-bound state? . D(B)-N bound state { { D D0 ( cu) B = D ( cd), B = + ( bu) B 0 ( bd) D(B)-N

( ) ) AGD 2) 7) 1

( 9 5 6 ) ) AGD ) 7) S. ψ (r, t) ψ(r, t) (r, t) Ĥ ψ(r, t) = e iĥt/ħ ψ(r, )e iĥt/ħ ˆn(r, t) = ψ (r, t)ψ(r, t) () : ψ(r, t)ψ (r, t) ψ (r, t)ψ(r, t) = δ(r r ) () ψ(r, t)ψ(r, t) ψ(r, t)ψ(r, t) = (3) ψ (r,

Twist knot orbifold Chern-Simons

Twist knot orbifold Chern-Simons 1 3 M π F : F (M) M ω = {ω ij }, Ω = {Ω ij }, cs := 1 4π 2 (ω 12 ω 13 ω 23 + ω 12 Ω 12 + ω 13 Ω 13 + ω 23 Ω 23 ) M Chern-Simons., S. Chern J. Simons, F (M) Pontrjagin 2.,

2 2 1?? 2 1 1, 2 1, 2 1, 2, 3,... 1, 2 1, 3? , 2 2, 3? k, l m, n k, l m, n kn > ml...? 2 m, n n m

2009 IA I 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 4 21 1 1 2 1! 4, 5 1? 50 1 2 1 1 2 1 4 2 2 2 1?? 2 1 1, 2 1, 2 1, 2, 3,... 1, 2 1, 3? 2 1 3 1 2 1 1, 2 2, 3? 2 1 3 2 3 2 k, l m, n k, l m, n kn > ml...? 2 m, n n m 3 2

/ Christopher Essex Radiation and the Violation of Bilinearity in the Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes, Planet.Space Sci.32 (1984) 1035 Radiat

/ Christopher Essex Radiation and the Violation of Bilinearity in the Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes, Planet.Space Sci.32 (1984) 1035 Radiation and the Continuing Failure of the Bilinear Formalism,

Introduction SFT Tachyon condensation in SFT SFT ( ) at 1 / 38

( ) 2011 5 14 at 1 / 38 Introduction? = String Field Theory = SFT 2 / 38 String Field : ϕ(x, t) x ϕ x / ( ) X ( σ) (string field): Φ[X(σ), t] X(σ) Φ (Φ X(σ) ) X(σ) & / 3 / 38 SFT with Lorentz & Gauge Invariance

x,, z v = (, b, c) v v 2 + b 2 + c 2 x,, z 1 i = (1, 0, 0), j = (0, 1, 0), k = (0, 0, 1) v 1 = ( 1, b 1, c 1 ), v 2 = ( 2, b 2, c 2 ) v

12 -- 1 4 2009 9 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-4 4-5 4-6 4-7 4-8 4-9 4-10 c 2011 1/(13) 4--1 2009 9 3 x,, z v = (, b, c) v v 2 + b 2 + c 2 x,, z 1 i = (1, 0, 0), j = (0, 1, 0), k = (0, 0, 1) v 1 = ( 1, b 1, c 1 ), v 2

Chebyshev Schrödinger Heisenberg H = 1 2m p2 + V (x), m = 1, h = 1 1/36 1 V (x) = { 0 (0 < x < L) (otherwise) ψ n (x) = 2 L sin (n + 1)π x L, n = 0, 1, 2,... Feynman K (a, b; T ) = e i EnT/ h ψ n (a)ψ

T g T 0 T 0 fragile * ) 1 9) η T g T g /T *1. τ τ η = Gτ. G τ

615-851 ryoichi@chemekyoto-uacjp 66-852 onuki@scphyskyoto-uacjp 1 T g T T fragile *2 1 11) 1 9) η T g T g /T *1 τ 198 τ η = Gτ G τ T c η τ 12) strong fragile T c strong η η exp(e/k B T ) 1 2/3 E SiO 2

W u = u(x, t) u tt = a 2 u xx, a > 0 (1) D := {(x, t) : 0 x l, t 0} u (0, t) = 0, u (l, t) = 0, t 0 (2)

3 215 4 27 1 1 u u(x, t) u tt a 2 u xx, a > (1) D : {(x, t) : x, t } u (, t), u (, t), t (2) u(x, ) f(x), u(x, ) t 2, x (3) u(x, t) X(x)T (t) u (1) 1 T (t) a 2 T (t) X (x) X(x) α (2) T (t) αa 2 T (t) (4)

C10-075 26 2 12 1 1 4 1.1............................. 4 1.2............................ 5 1.3................................... 5 2 6 2.1............................ 6 2.2......................... 6

5. [1 ] 1 [], u(x, t) t c u(x, t) x (5.3) ξ x + ct, η x ct (5.4),u(x, t) ξ, η u(ξ, η), ξ t,, ( u(ξ,η) ξ η u(x, t) t ) u(x, t) { ( u(ξ, η) c t ξ ξ { (

5 5.1 [ ] ) d f(t) + a d f(t) + bf(t) : f(t) 1 dt dt ) u(x, t) c u(x, t) : u(x, t) t x : ( ) ) 1 : y + ay, : y + ay + by : ( ) 1 ) : y + ay, : yy + ay 3 ( ): ( ) ) : y + ay, : y + ay b [],,, [ ] au xx

2.1: n = N/V ( ) k F = ( 3π 2 N ) 1/3 = ( 3π 2 n ) 1/3 V (2.5) [ ] a = h2 2m k2 F h2 2ma (1 27 ) (1 8 ) erg, (2.6) /k B 1 11 / K

2 2.1? [ ] L 1 ε(p) = 1 ( p 2 2m x + p 2 y + pz) 2 = h2 ( k 2 2m x + ky 2 + kz) 2 n x, n y, n z (2.1) (2.2) p = hk = h 2π L (n x, n y, n z ) (2.3) n k p 1 i (ε i ε i+1 )1 1 g = 2S + 1 2 1/2 g = 2 ( p F

,, Andrej Gendiar (Density Matrix Renormalization Group, DMRG) 1 10 S.R. White [1, 2] 2 DMRG ( ) [3, 2] DMRG Baxter [4, 5] 2 Ising 2 1 Ising 1 1 Ising

,, Andrej Gendiar (Density Matrix Renormalization Group, DMRG) 1 10 S.R. White [1, 2] 2 DMRG ( ) [3, 2] DMRG Baxter [4, 5] 2 Ising 2 1 Ising 1 1 Ising Model 1 Ising 1 Ising Model N Ising (σ i = ±1) (Free

42 3 u = (37) MeV/c 2 (3.4) [1] u amu m p m n [1] m H [2] m p = (4) MeV/c 2 = (13) u m n = (4) MeV/c 2 =

3 3.1 3.1.1 kg m s J = kg m 2 s 2 MeV MeV [1] 1MeV=1 6 ev = 1.62 176 462 (63) 1 13 J (3.1) [1] 1MeV/c 2 =1.782 661 731 (7) 1 3 kg (3.2) c =1 MeV (atomic mass unit) 12 C u = 1 12 M(12 C) (3.3) 41 42 3 u

Aharonov-Bohm(AB) S 0 1/ 2 1/ 2 S t = 1/ 2 1/2 1/2 1/, (12.1) 2 1/2 1/2 *1 AB ( ) 0 e iθ AB S AB = e iθ, AB 0 θ 2π ϕ = e ϕ (ϕ ) ϕ

1 13 6 8 3.6.3 - Aharonov-BohmAB) S 1/ 1/ S t = 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/, 1.1) 1/ 1/ *1 AB ) e iθ AB S AB = e iθ, AB θ π ϕ = e ϕ ϕ ) ϕ 1.) S S ) e iθ S w = e iθ 1.3) θ θ AB??) S t = 4 sin θ 1 + e iθ AB e iθ AB + e

[ ] = L [δ (D ) (x )] = L D [g ] = L D [E ] = L Table : ħh = m = D D, V (x ) = g δ (D ) (x ) E g D E (Table )D = Schrödinger (.3)D = (regularization)

. D............................................... : E = κ ............................................ 3.................................................

1: 3.3 1/8000 1/ m m/s v = 2kT/m = 2RT/M k R 8.31 J/(K mole) M 18 g 1 5 a v t πa 2 vt kg (

1905 1 1.1 0.05 mm 1 µm 2 1 1 2004 21 2004 7 21 2005 web 2 [1, 2] 1 1: 3.3 1/8000 1/30 3 10 10 m 3 500 m/s 4 1 10 19 5 6 7 1.2 3 4 v = 2kT/m = 2RT/M k R 8.31 J/(K mole) M 18 g 1 5 a v t πa 2 vt 6 6 10

t = h x z z = h z = t (x, z) (v x (x, z, t), v z (x, z, t)) ρ v x x + v z z = 0 (1) 2-2. (v x, v z ) φ(x, z, t) v x = φ x, v z

I 1 m 2 l k 2 x = 0 x 1 x 1 2 x 2 g x x 2 x 1 m k m 1-1. L x 1, x 2, ẋ 1, ẋ 2 ẋ 1 x = 0 1-2. 2 Q = x 1 + x 2 2 q = x 2 x 1 l L Q, q, Q, q M = 2m µ = m 2 1-3. Q q 1-4. 2 x 2 = h 1 x 1 t = 0 2 1 t x 1 (t)

δ ij δ ij ˆx ˆx ŷ ŷ ẑ ẑ 0, ˆx ŷ ŷ ˆx ẑ, ŷ ẑ ẑ ŷ ẑ, ẑ ˆx ˆx ẑ ŷ, a b a x ˆx + a y ŷ + a z ẑ b x ˆx + b

23 2 2.1 n n r x, y, z ˆx ŷ ẑ 1 a a x ˆx + a y ŷ + a z ẑ 2.1.1 3 a iˆx i. 2.1.2 i1 i j k e x e y e z 3 a b a i b i i 1, 2, 3 x y z ˆx i ˆx j δ ij, 2.1.3 n a b a i b i a i b i a x b x + a y b y + a z b

1 (Contents) (4) Why Has the Superstring Theory Collapsed? Noboru NAKANISHI 2 2. A Periodic Potential Problem

7 1 2017 3 2017 3 18 1 (Contents) 1. 2 2. (4) 13 3. 1 20 4. 25 5. 28 6. 29 1. Why Has the Superstring Theory Collapsed? Noboru NAKANISHI 2 2. A Periodic Potential Problem in Quantum Mechanics (4) Kenji

Undulator.dvi

X X 1 1 2 Free Electron Laser: FEL 2.1 2 2 3 SACLA 4 SACLA [1]-[6] [7] 1: S N λ [9] XFEL OHO 13 X [8] 2 2.1 2(a) (c) z y y (a) S N 90 λ u 4 [10, 11] Halbach (b) 2: (a) (b) (c) (c) 1 2 [11] B y = n=1 B

d (i) (ii) 1 Georges[2] Maier [3] [1] ω = 0 1

16 5 19 10 d (i) (ii) 1 Georges[2] Maier [3] 2 10 1 [1] ω = 0 1 [4, 5] Dynamical Mean-Field Theory (DMFT) [2] DMFT I CPA [10] CPA CPA Σ(z) z CPA Σ(z) Σ(z) Σ(z) z - CPA Σ(z) DMFT Σ(z) CPA [6] 3 1960 [7]

5 1.2, 2, d a V a = M (1.2.1), M, a,,,,, Ω, V a V, V a = V + Ω r. (1.2.2), r i 1, i 2, i 3, i 1, i 2, i 3, A 2, A = 3 A n i n = n=1 da = 3 = n=1 3 n=1

4 1 1.1 ( ) 5 1.2, 2, d a V a = M (1.2.1), M, a,,,,, Ω, V a V, V a = V + Ω r. (1.2.2), r i 1, i 2, i 3, i 1, i 2, i 3, A 2, A = 3 A n i n = n=1 da = 3 = n=1 3 n=1 da n i n da n i n + 3 A ni n n=1 3 n=1

1. 1.1....................... 1.2............................ 1.3.................... 1.4.................. 2. 2.1.................... 2.2..................... 2.3.................... 3. 3.1.....................

Ginzburg-Landau A A Kyoto Univ. Kobe Design Univ. A N. Tsukamoto, H. Fujisaka, K. Ouchi A Ginzburg-Landau ψ = ψ + (1 + ic 1 ) 2 ψ (1 + ic 2 ) ψ 2 ψ (1

Ginzburg-Landau A A Kyoto Univ. Kobe Design Univ. A N. Tsukamoto, H. Fujisaka, K. Ouchi A Ginzburg-Landau ψ = ψ + (1 + ic 1 ) 2 ψ (1 + ic 2 ) ψ 2 ψ (1) Hopf [1] c 1, c 2 (1) { } ψ n+1 (r) = dr J(r r )ψ

,,,17,,, ( ),, E Q [S T F t ] < S t, t [, T ],,,,,,,,

14 5 1 ,,,17,,,194 1 4 ( ),, E Q [S T F t ] < S t, t [, T ],,,,,,,, 1 4 1.1........................................ 4 5.1........................................ 5.........................................

Chadwick [ 1 ] 1919,, electron number Q kinetic energy [MeV] 8.1: 8.1, 1 internal conversion electron E γ E e =

8 8.1 8.1.1 1 Chadwick [ 1 ] 1919,, electron number Q 0.0 0. 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 kinetic energy [MeV] 8.1: 8.1, 1 internal conversion electron E γ E e = E γ φ φ E e X 153 154 8, 3 H 3 He, ( ) 3 H( 1 ) 3 He(

18 2 F 12 r 2 r 1 (3) Coulomb km Coulomb M = kg F G = ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 = [N]. Coulomb

r 1 r 2 r 1 r 2 2 Coulomb Gauss Coulomb 2.1 Coulomb 1 2 r 1 r 2 1 2 F 12 2 1 F 21 F 12 = F 21 = 1 4πε 0 1 2 r 1 r 2 2 r 1 r 2 r 1 r 2 (2.1) Coulomb ε 0 = 107 4πc 2 =8.854 187 817 10 12 C 2 N 1 m 2 (2.2)

15_15KEK

25, Nov. 24th - - T. Hyodo, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28, 3345 (23) T. Hyodo, Phys. ev. Lett., 322 (23) - - - Λ(45) Y. Kamiya, T. Hyodo, arxiv:59.46 [hep-ph] K or N 2 イントロダクション ハドロンの構造とエキゾチック状態 ハドロンの分類 観測されているハドロン

Black-Scholes [1] Nelson [2] Schrödinger 1 Black Scholes [1] Black-Scholes Nelson [2][3][4] Schrödinger Nelson Parisi Wu [5] Nelson Parisi-W

003 7 14 Black-Scholes [1] Nelson [] Schrödinger 1 Black Scholes [1] Black-Scholes Nelson [][3][4] Schrödinger Nelson Parisi Wu [5] Nelson Parisi-Wu Nelson e-mail: takatoshi-tasaki@nifty.com kabutaro@mocha.freemail.ne.jp

77

O r r r, F F r,r r = r r F = F (. ) r = r r 76 77 d r = F d r = F (. ) F + F = 0 d ( ) r + r = 0 (. 3) M = + MR = r + r (. 4) P G P MX = + MY = + MZ = z + z PG / PG = / M d R = 0 (. 5) 78 79 d r = F d

OTO研究会スライド

OTO @, 2017 5 26 2 CFT OTO ) PTEP 2016 (2016) no.11, 113B06 (arxiv1602.06542[hep-th]) Collaboration with P. Caputa(YITP) and A.Veliz-Osorio(Queen Mary U.) i i +1 H = X i i z z i+1 + h X i i x i z = 1

L. S. Abstract. Date: last revised on 9 Feb translated to Japanese by Kazumoto Iguchi. Original papers: Received May 13, L. Onsager and S.

L. S. Abstract. Date: last revised on 9 Feb 01. translated to Japanese by Kazumoto Iguchi. Original papers: Received May 13, 1953. L. Onsager and S. Machlup, Fluctuations and Irreversibel Processes, Physical