EGunGPU

supercomputer2010.ppt

nanri@cc.kyushu-u.ac.jp 1 !! : 11 12! : nanri@cc.kyushu-u.ac.jp! : Word 2 ! PC GPU) 1997 7 http://wiredvision.jp/news/200806/2008062322.html 3 !! (Cell, GPU )! 4 ! etc...! 5 !! etc. 6 !! 20km 40 km ) 340km

untitled

SPring-8 RFgun JASRI/SPring-8 6..7 Contents.. 3.. 5. 6. 7. 8. . 3 cavity γ E A = er 3 πε γ vb r B = v E c r c A B A ( ) F = e E + v B A A A A B dp e( v B+ E) = = m d dt dt ( γ v) dv e ( ) dt v B E v E

IPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol.2014-ARC-213 No.24 Vol.2014-HPC-147 No /12/10 GPU 1,a) 1,b) 1,c) 1,d) GPU GPU Structure Of Array Array Of

GPU 1,a) 1,b) 1,c) 1,d) GPU 1 GPU Structure Of Array Array Of Structure 1. MPS(Moving Particle Semi-Implicit) [1] SPH(Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics) [] DEM(Distinct Element Method)[] [] 1 Tokyo Institute

GPU GPU CPU CPU CPU GPU GPU N N CPU ( ) 1 GPU CPU GPU 2D 3D CPU GPU GPU GPGPU GPGPU 2 nvidia GPU CUDA 3 GPU 3.1 GPU Core 1

GPU 4 2010 8 28 1 GPU CPU CPU CPU GPU GPU N N CPU ( ) 1 GPU CPU GPU 2D 3D CPU GPU GPU GPGPU GPGPU 2 nvidia GPU CUDA 3 GPU 3.1 GPU Core 1 Register & Shared Memory ( ) CPU CPU(Intel Core i7 965) GPU(Tesla

23 Fig. 2: hwmodulev2 3. Reconfigurable HPC 3.1 hw/sw hw/sw hw/sw FPGA PC FPGA PC FPGA HPC FPGA FPGA hw/sw hw/sw hw- Module FPGA hwmodule hw/sw FPGA h

23 FPGA CUDA Performance Comparison of FPGA Array with CUDA on Poisson Equation (lijiang@sekine-lab.ei.tuat.ac.jp), (kazuki@sekine-lab.ei.tuat.ac.jp), (takahashi@sekine-lab.ei.tuat.ac.jp), (tamukoh@cc.tuat.ac.jp),

i

009 I 1 8 5 i 0 1 0.1..................................... 1 0.................................................. 1 0.3................................. 0.4........................................... 3

m dv = mg + kv2 dt m dv dt = mg k v v m dv dt = mg + kv2 α = mg k v = α 1 e rt 1 + e rt m dv dt = mg + kv2 dv mg + kv 2 = dt m dv α 2 + v 2 = k m dt d

m v = mg + kv m v = mg k v v m v = mg + kv α = mg k v = α e rt + e rt m v = mg + kv v mg + kv = m v α + v = k m v (v α (v + α = k m ˆ ( v α ˆ αk v = m v + α ln v α v + α = αk m t + C v α v + α = e αk m

21 2 26 i 1 1 1.1............................ 1 1.2............................ 3 2 9 2.1................... 9 2.2.......... 9 2.3................... 11 2.4....................... 12 3 15 3.1..........

4 2 Rutherford 89 Rydberg λ = R ( n 2 ) n 2 n = n +,n +2, n = Lyman n =2 Balmer n =3 Paschen R Rydberg R = cm 896 Zeeman Zeeman Zeeman Lorentz

2 Rutherford 2. Rutherford N. Bohr Rutherford 859 Kirchhoff Bunsen 86 Maxwell Maxwell 885 Balmer λ Balmer λ = 364.56 n 2 n 2 4 Lyman, Paschen 3 nm, n =3, 4, 5, 4 2 Rutherford 89 Rydberg λ = R ( n 2 ) n

GPGPU

GPGPU 2013 1008 2015 1 23 Abstract In recent years, with the advance of microscope technology, the alive cells have been able to observe. On the other hand, from the standpoint of image processing, the

Fourier series to Fourier transform Masahiro Yamamoto September 9, 2016 OB (r j)j r (r i)i Figure 1: normal coordinate, projection, inner product 3 r

Fourier series to Fourier transform Masahiro Yamamoto September 9, 2016 OB (r j)j r (r i)i Figure 1: normal coordinate, projection, inner product 3 r i.j, k x = r i, y = r j, z = r k r = xi + yj + zk N

untitled

A = QΛQ T A n n Λ Q A = XΛX 1 A n n Λ X GPGPU A 3 T Q T AQ = T (Q: ) T u i = λ i u i T {λ i } {u i } QR MR 3 v i = Q u i A {v i } A n = 9000 Quad Core Xeon 2 LAPACK (4/3) n 3 O(n 2 ) O(n 3 ) A {v i }

2 G(k) e ikx = (ik) n x n n! n=0 (k ) ( ) X n = ( i) n n k n G(k) k=0 F (k) ln G(k) = ln e ikx n κ n F (k) = F (k) (ik) n n= n! κ n κ n = ( i) n n k n

. X {x, x 2, x 3,... x n } X X {, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} X x i P i. 0 P i 2. n P i = 3. P (i ω) = i ω P i P 3 {x, x 2, x 3,... x n } ω P i = 6 X f(x) f(x) X n n f(x i )P i n x n i P i X n 2 G(k) e ikx = (ik) n

Table 1: Basic parameter set. Aperture values indicate the radius. δ is relative momentum deviation. Parameter Value Unit Initial emittance 10 mm.mrad

SuperKEKB EMITTANCE GROWTH BY MISALIGNMENTS AND JITTERS IN SUPERKEKB INJECTOR LINAC Y. Seimiya, M. Satoh, T. Suwada, T. Higo, Y. Enomoto, F. Miyahara, K. Furukawa High Energy Accelerator Research Organization

untitled

A = QΛQ T A n n Λ Q A = XΛX 1 A n n Λ X GPGPU A 3 T Q T AQ = T (Q: ) T u i = λ i u i T {λ i } {u i } QR MR 3 v i = Q u i A {v i } A n = 9000 Quad Core Xeon 2 LAPACK (4/3) n 3 O(n 2 ) O(n 3 ) A {v i }

A 99% MS-Free Presentation

A 99% MS-Free Presentation 2 Galactic Dynamics (Binney & Tremaine 1987, 2008) Dynamics of Galaxies (Bertin 2000) Dynamical Evolution of Globular Clusters (Spitzer 1987) The Gravitational Million-Body Problem

CPU Levels in the memory hierarchy Level 1 Level 2... Increasing distance from the CPU in access time Level n Size of the memory at each level 1: 2.2

FFT 1 Fourier fast Fourier transform FFT FFT FFT 1 FFT FFT 2 Fourier 2.1 Fourier FFT Fourier discrete Fourier transform DFT DFT n 1 y k = j=0 x j ω jk n, 0 k n 1 (1) x j y k ω n = e 2πi/n i = 1 (1) n DFT

all.dvi

5,, Euclid.,..,... Euclid,.,.,, e i (i =,, ). 6 x a x e e e x.:,,. a,,. a a = a e + a e + a e = {e, e, e } a (.) = a i e i = a i e i (.) i= {a,a,a } T ( T ),.,,,,. (.),.,...,,. a 0 0 a = a 0 + a + a 0

II 2 II

II 2 II 2005 yugami@cc.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp 2005 4 1 1 2 5 2.1.................................... 5 2.2................................. 6 2.3............................. 6 2.4.................................

JKR Point loading of an elastic half-space 2 3 Pressure applied to a circular region Boussinesq, n =

JKR 17 9 15 1 Point loading of an elastic half-space Pressure applied to a circular region 4.1 Boussinesq, n = 1.............................. 4. Hertz, n = 1.................................. 6 4 Hertz

n (1.6) i j=1 1 n a ij x j = b i (1.7) (1.7) (1.4) (1.5) (1.4) (1.7) u, v, w ε x, ε y, ε x, γ yz, γ zx, γ xy (1.8) ε x = u x ε y = v y ε z = w z γ yz

1 2 (a 1, a 2, a n ) (b 1, b 2, b n ) A (1.1) A = a 1 b 1 + a 2 b 2 + + a n b n (1.1) n A = a i b i (1.2) i=1 n i 1 n i=1 a i b i n i=1 A = a i b i (1.3) (1.3) (1.3) (1.1) (ummation convention) a 11 x

液晶の物理１：連続体理論（弾性，粘性）

The Physics of Liquid Crystals P. G. de Gennes and J. Prost (Oxford University Press, 1993) Liquid crystals are beautiful and mysterious; I am fond of them for both reasons. My hope is that some readers

5 1.2, 2, d a V a = M (1.2.1), M, a,,,,, Ω, V a V, V a = V + Ω r. (1.2.2), r i 1, i 2, i 3, i 1, i 2, i 3, A 2, A = 3 A n i n = n=1 da = 3 = n=1 3 n=1

4 1 1.1 ( ) 5 1.2, 2, d a V a = M (1.2.1), M, a,,,,, Ω, V a V, V a = V + Ω r. (1.2.2), r i 1, i 2, i 3, i 1, i 2, i 3, A 2, A = 3 A n i n = n=1 da = 3 = n=1 3 n=1 da n i n da n i n + 3 A ni n n=1 3 n=1

4/15 No.

4/15 No. 1 4/15 No. 4/15 No. 3 Particle of mass m moving in a potential V(r) V(r) m i ψ t = m ψ(r,t)+v(r)ψ(r,t) ψ(r,t) = ϕ(r)e iωt ψ(r,t) Wave function steady state m ϕ(r)+v(r)ϕ(r) = εϕ(r) Eigenvalue problem

07-二村幸孝・出口大輔.indd

GPU Graphics Processing Units HPC High Performance Computing GPU GPGPU General-Purpose computation on GPU CPU GPU GPU *1 Intel Quad-Core Xeon E5472 3.0 GHz 2 6 MB L2 cache 1600 MHz FSB 80 GFlops 1 nvidia

( )

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ( ) () http://www-astro.physics.ox.ac.uk/~wjs/apm_grey.gif http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap950917.html ( ) SDSS : d 2 r i dt 2 = Gm jr ij j i rij 3 = Newton 3 0.1% 19 20 20 2 ( ) 3 3

変 位 変位とは 物体中のある点が変形後に 別の点に異動したときの位置の変化で あり ベクトル量である 変位には 物体の変形の他に剛体運動 剛体変位 が含まれている 剛体変位 P(x, y, z) 平行移動と回転 P! (x + u, y + v, z + w) Q(x + d x, y + dy,

変 位 変位とは 物体中のある点が変形後に 別の点に異動したときの位置の変化で あり ベクトル量である 変位には 物体の変形の他に剛体運動 剛体変位 が含まれている 剛体変位 P(x, y, z) 平行移動と回転 P! (x + u, y + v, z + w) Q(x + d x, y + dy, z + dz) Q! (x + d x + u + du, y + dy + v + dv, z +

.5 z = a + b + c n.6 = a sin t y = b cos t dy d a e e b e + e c e e e + e 3 s36 3 a + y = a, b > b 3 s363.7 y = + 3 y = + 3 s364.8 cos a 3 s365.9 y =,

[ ] IC. r, θ r, θ π, y y = 3 3 = r cos θ r sin θ D D = {, y ; y }, y D r, θ ep y yddy D D 9 s96. d y dt + 3dy + y = cos t dt t = y = e π + e π +. t = π y =.9 s6.3 d y d + dy d + y = y =, dy d = 3 a, b

1 GPU GPGPU GPU CPU 2 GPU 2007 NVIDIA GPGPU CUDA[3] GPGPU CUDA GPGPU CUDA GPGPU GPU GPU GPU Graphics Processing Unit LSI LSI CPU ( ) DRAM GPU LSI GPU

GPGPU (I) GPU GPGPU 1 GPU(Graphics Processing Unit) GPU GPGPU(General-Purpose computing on GPUs) GPU GPGPU GPU ( PC ) PC PC GPU PC PC GPU GPU 2008 TSUBAME NVIDIA GPU(Tesla S1070) TOP500 29 [1] 2009 AMD

Part () () Γ Part ,

Contents a 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7. 8.. 8.. 8.3. 8 Part. 9. 9.. 9.. 3. 3.. 3.. 3 4. 5 4.. 5 4.. 9 4.3. 3 Part. 6 5. () 6 5.. () 7 5.. 9 5.3. Γ 3 6. 3 6.. 3 6.. 3 6.3. 33 Part 3. 34 7. 34 7.. 34 7.. 34 8. 35

A

A04-164 2008 2 13 1 4 1.1.......................................... 4 1.2..................................... 4 1.3..................................... 4 1.4..................................... 5 2

2.2 h h l L h L = l cot h (1) (1) L l L l l = L tan h (2) (2) L l 2 l 3 h 2.3 a h a h (a, h)

1 16 10 5 1 2 2.1 a a a 1 1 1 2.2 h h l L h L = l cot h (1) (1) L l L l l = L tan h (2) (2) L l 2 l 3 h 2.3 a h a h (a, h) 4 2 3 4 2 5 2.4 x y (x,y) l a x = l cot h cos a, (3) y = l cot h sin a (4) h a

02-量子力学の復習

4/17 No. 1 4/17 No. 2 4/17 No. 3 Particle of mass m moving in a potential V(r) V(r) m i ψ t = 2 2m 2 ψ(r,t)+v(r)ψ(r,t) ψ(r,t) Wave function ψ(r,t) = ϕ(r)e iωt steady state 2 2m 2 ϕ(r)+v(r)ϕ(r) = εϕ(r)

MUFFIN3

MUFFIN - MUltiFarious FIeld simulator for Non-equilibrium system - ( ) MUFFIN WG3 - - JCII, - ( ) - ( ) - ( ) - (JSR) - - MUFFIN sec -3 msec -6 sec GOURMET SUSHI MUFFIN -9 nsec PASTA -1 psec -15 fsec COGNAC

AMD/ATI Radeon HD 5870 GPU DEGIMA LINPACK HD 5870 GPU DEGIMA LINPACK GFlops/Watt GFlops/Watt Abstract GPU Computing has lately attracted

DEGIMA LINPACK Energy Performance for LINPACK Benchmark on DEGIMA 1 AMD/ATI Radeon HD 5870 GPU DEGIMA LINPACK HD 5870 GPU DEGIMA LINPACK 1.4698 GFlops/Watt 1.9658 GFlops/Watt Abstract GPU Computing has

( ; ) C. H. Scholz, The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting : - ( ) σ = σ t sin 2π(r a) λ dσ d(r a) =

1 9 8 1 1 1 ; 1 11 16 C. H. Scholz, The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting 1. 1.1 1.1.1 : - σ = σ t sin πr a λ dσ dr a = E a = π λ σ πr a t cos λ 1 r a/λ 1 cos 1 E: σ t = Eλ πa a λ E/π γ : λ/ 3 γ =

9. 05 L x P(x) P(0) P(x) u(x) u(x) (0 < = x < = L) P(x) E(x) A(x) P(L) f ( d EA du ) = 0 (9.) dx dx u(0) = 0 (9.2) E(L)A(L) du (L) = f (9.3) dx (9.) P

9 (Finite Element Method; FEM) 9. 9. P(0) P(x) u(x) (a) P(L) f P(0) P(x) (b) 9. P(L) 9. 05 L x P(x) P(0) P(x) u(x) u(x) (0 < = x < = L) P(x) E(x) A(x) P(L) f ( d EA du ) = 0 (9.) dx dx u(0) = 0 (9.2) E(L)A(L)

80 4 r ˆρ i (r, t) δ(r x i (t)) (4.1) x i (t) ρ i ˆρ i t = 0 i r 0 t(> 0) j r 0 + r < δ(r 0 x i (0))δ(r 0 + r x j (t)) > (4.2) r r 0 G i j (r, t) dr 0

79 4 4.1 4.1.1 x i (t) x j (t) O O r 0 + r r r 0 x i (0) r 0 x i (0) 4.1 L. van. Hove 1954 space-time correlation function V N 4.1 ρ 0 = N/V i t 80 4 r ˆρ i (r, t) δ(r x i (t)) (4.1) x i (t) ρ i ˆρ i t

all.dvi

38 5 Cauchy.,,,,., σ.,, 3,,. 5.1 Cauchy (a) (b) (a) (b) 5.1: 5.1. Cauchy 39 F Q Newton F F F Q F Q 5.2: n n ds df n ( 5.1). df n n df(n) df n, t n. t n = df n (5.1) ds 40 5 Cauchy t l n mds df n 5.3: t

( )/2 hara/lectures/lectures-j.html 2, {H} {T } S = {H, T } {(H, H), (H, T )} {(H, T ), (T, T )} {(H, H), (T, T )} {1

( )/2 http://www2.math.kyushu-u.ac.jp/ hara/lectures/lectures-j.html 1 2011 ( )/2 2 2011 4 1 2 1.1 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 1.1.1 sample space S S = {H, T } H T T H S = {(H, H), (H, T ), (T, H), (T, T )} (T, H) S

sec13.dvi

13 13.1 O r F R = m d 2 r dt 2 m r m = F = m r M M d2 R dt 2 = m d 2 r dt 2 = F = F (13.1) F O L = r p = m r ṙ dl dt = m ṙ ṙ + m r r = r (m r ) = r F N. (13.2) N N = R F 13.2 O ˆn ω L O r u u = ω r 1 1:

2005 2006.2.22-1 - 1 Fig. 1 2005 2006.2.22-2 - Element-Free Galerkin Method (EFGM) Meshless Local Petrov-Galerkin Method (MLPGM) 2005 2006.2.22-3 - 2 MLS u h (x) 1 p T (x) = [1, x, y]. (1) φ(x) 0.5 φ(x)

! 行行 CPUDSP PPESPECell/B.E. CPUGPU 行行 SIMD [SSE, AltiVec] 用 HPC CPUDSP PPESPE (Cell/B.E.) SPE CPUGPU GPU CPU DSP DSP PPE SPE SPE CPU DSP SPE 2

! OpenCL [Open Computing Language] 言 [OpenCL C 言 ] CPU, GPU, Cell/B.E.,DSP 言 行行 [OpenCL Runtime] OpenCL C 言 API Khronos OpenCL Working Group AMD Broadcom Blizzard Apple ARM Codeplay Electronic Arts Freescale

Microsoft PowerPoint - 島田美帆.ppt

コンパクト ERL におけるバンチ圧縮の可能性に関して 分子科学研究所,UVSOR 島田美帆日本原子力研究開発機構,JAEA 羽島良一 Outline Beam dynamics studies for the 5 GeV ERL 規格化エミッタンス 0.1 mm mrad を維持する周回部の設計 Towards user experiment at the compact ERL Short bunch

main.dvi

PC 1 1 [1][2] [3][4] ( ) GPU(Graphics Processing Unit) GPU PC GPU PC ( 2 GPU ) GPU Harris Corner Detector[5] CPU ( ) ( ) CPU GPU 2 3 GPU 4 5 6 7 1 toyohiro@isc.kyutech.ac.jp 45 2 ( ) CPU ( ) ( ) () 2.1

The Physics of Atmospheres CAPTER :

The Physics of Atmospheres CAPTER 4 1 4 2 41 : 2 42 14 43 17 44 25 45 27 46 3 47 31 48 32 49 34 41 35 411 36 maintex 23/11/28 The Physics of Atmospheres CAPTER 4 2 4 41 : 2 1 σ 2 (21) (22) k I = I exp(

2.5 (Gauss) (flux) v(r)( ) S n S v n v n (1) v n S = v n S = v S, n S S. n n S v S v Minoru TANAKA (Osaka Univ.) I(2012), Sec p. 1/30

2.5 (Gauss) 2.5.1 (flux) v(r)( ) n v n v n (1) v n = v n = v, n. n n v v I(2012), ec. 2. 5 p. 1/30 i (2) lim v(r i ) i = v(r) d. i 0 i (flux) I(2012), ec. 2. 5 p. 2/30 2.5.2 ( ) ( ) q 1 r 2 E 2 q r 1 E

housoku.dvi

: 1 :, 2002 07 14 1 3 11 3 12 : 3 13 : 5 14 6 141 6 142 8 143 8 144 8 145 9 2 10 21 10 : 2 22 11 23 11 24 11 A : 12 B 14 C 15 ( ) ( ) ( ),, (,, ) 2,, : 1 3 1 11 (t),, ρv 0 (1) t (t) ( A ) ( ) ρ (t) t +ρ

50 2 I SI MKSA r q r q F F = 1 qq 4πε 0 r r 2 r r r r (2.2 ε 0 = 1 c 2 µ 0 c = m/s q 2.1 r q' F r = 0 µ 0 = 4π 10 7 N/A 2 k = 1/(4πε 0 qq

49 2 I II 2.1 3 e e = 1.602 10 19 A s (2.1 50 2 I SI MKSA 2.1.1 r q r q F F = 1 qq 4πε 0 r r 2 r r r r (2.2 ε 0 = 1 c 2 µ 0 c = 3 10 8 m/s q 2.1 r q' F r = 0 µ 0 = 4π 10 7 N/A 2 k = 1/(4πε 0 qq F = k r

IPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol.2013-ARC-203 No /2/1 SMYLE OpenCL (NEDO) IT FPGA SMYLEref SMYLE OpenCL SMYLE OpenCL FPGA 1

SMYLE OpenCL 128 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 (NEDO) IT FPGA SMYLEref SMYLE OpenCL SMYLE OpenCL FPGA 128 SMYLEref SMYLE OpenCL SMYLE OpenCL Implementation and Evaluations on 128 Cores Takuji Hieda 1 Noriko Etani

006 11 8 0 3 1 5 1.1..................... 5 1......................... 6 1.3.................... 6 1.4.................. 8 1.5................... 8 1.6................... 10 1.6.1......................

1 1.1,,,.. (, ),..,. (Fig. 1.1). Macro theory (e.g. Continuum mechanics) Consideration under the simple concept (e.g. ionic radius, bond valence) Stru

1. 1-1. 1-. 1-3.. MD -1. -. -3. MD 1 1 1.1,,,.. (, ),..,. (Fig. 1.1). Macro theory (e.g. Continuum mechanics) Consideration under the simple concept (e.g. ionic radius, bond valence) Structural relaxation

2 Chapter 4 (f4a). 2. (f4cone) ( θ) () g M. 2. (f4b) T M L P a θ (f4eki) ρ H A a g. v ( ) 2. H(t) ( )

http://astr-www.kj.yamagata-u.ac.jp/~shibata f4a f4b 2 f4cone f4eki f4end 4 f5meanfp f6coin () f6a f7a f7b f7d f8a f8b f9a f9b f9c f9kep f0a f0bt version feqmo fvec4 fvec fvec6 fvec2 fvec3 f3a (-D) f3b

No δs δs = r + δr r = δr (3) δs δs = r r = δr + u(r + δr, t) u(r, t) (4) δr = (δx, δy, δz) u i (r + δr, t) u i (r, t) = u i x j δx j (5) δs 2

No.2 1 2 2 δs δs = r + δr r = δr (3) δs δs = r r = δr + u(r + δr, t) u(r, t) (4) δr = (δx, δy, δz) u i (r + δr, t) u i (r, t) = u i δx j (5) δs 2 = δx i δx i + 2 u i δx i δx j = δs 2 + 2s ij δx i δx j

3 filename=quantum-3dim110705a.tex ,2 [1],[2],[3] [3] U(x, y, z; t), p x ˆp x = h i x, p y ˆp y = h i y, p z ˆp z = h

filename=quantum-dim110705a.tex 1 1. 1, [1],[],[]. 1980 []..1 U(x, y, z; t), p x ˆp x = h i x, p y ˆp y = h i y, p z ˆp z = h i z (.1) Ĥ ( ) Ĥ = h m x + y + + U(x, y, z; t) (.) z (U(x, y, z; t)) (U(x,

基礎から学ぶトラヒック理論 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 初版 1 刷発行時のものです.

基礎から学ぶトラヒック理論 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. http://www.morikita.co.jp/books/mid/085221 このサンプルページの内容は, 初版 1 刷発行時のものです. i +α 3 1 2 4 5 1 2 ii 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 9.3 2014 6 iii 1 1 2 5 2.1 5 2.2 7

OHO.dvi

1 Coil D-shaped electrodes ( [1] ) Vacuum chamber Ion source Oscillator 1.1 m e v B F = evb (1) r m v2 = evb r v = erb (2) m r T = 2πr v = 2πm (3) eb v

) ] [ h m x + y + + V x) φ = Eφ 1) z E = i h t 13) x << 1) N n n= = N N + 1) 14) N n n= = N N + 1)N + 1) 6 15) N n 3 n= = 1 4 N N + 1) 16) N n 4

1. k λ ν ω T v p v g k = π λ ω = πν = π T v p = λν = ω k v g = dω dk 1) ) 3) 4). p = hk = h λ 5) E = hν = hω 6) h = h π 7) h =6.6618 1 34 J sec) hc=197.3 MeV fm = 197.3 kev pm= 197.3 ev nm = 1.97 1 3 ev

GPU n Graphics Processing Unit CG CAD

GPU 2016/06/27 第 20 回 GPU コンピューティング講習会 ( 東京工業大学 ) 1 GPU n Graphics Processing Unit CG CAD www.nvidia.co.jp www.autodesk.co.jp www.pixar.com GPU n GPU ü n NVIDIA CUDA ü NVIDIA GPU ü OS Linux, Windows, Mac

TOP URL 1

TOP URL http://amonphys.web.fc2.com/ 1 30 3 30.1.............. 3 30.2........................... 4 30.3...................... 5 30.4........................ 6 30.5.................................. 8 30.6...............................

Gmech08.dvi

145 13 13.1 13.1.1 0 m mg S 13.1 F 13.1 F /m S F F 13.1 F mg S F F mg 13.1: m d2 r 2 = F + F = 0 (13.1) 146 13 F = F (13.2) S S S S S P r S P r r = r 0 + r (13.3) r 0 S S m d2 r 2 = F (13.4) (13.3) d 2

2012専門分科会_new_4.pptx

d dt L L = 0 q i q i d dt L L = 0 r i i r i r r + Δr Δr δl = 0 dl dt = d dt i L L q i q i + q i i q i = q d L L i + q i i dt q i i q i = i L L q i L = 0, H = q q i L = E i q i i d dt L q q i i L = L(q

all.dvi

72 9 Hooke,,,. Hooke. 9.1 Hooke 1 Hooke. 1, 1 Hooke. σ, ε, Young. σ ε (9.1), Young. τ γ G τ Gγ (9.2) X 1, X 2. Poisson, Poisson ν. ν ε 22 (9.) ε 11 F F X 2 X 1 9.1: Poisson 9.1. Hooke 7 Young Poisson G

I ( ) 1 de Broglie 1 (de Broglie) p λ k h Planck ( Js) p = h λ = k (1) h 2π : Dirac k B Boltzmann ( J/K) T U = 3 2 k BT

I (008 4 0 de Broglie (de Broglie p λ k h Planck ( 6.63 0 34 Js p = h λ = k ( h π : Dirac k B Boltzmann (.38 0 3 J/K T U = 3 k BT ( = λ m k B T h m = 0.067m 0 m 0 = 9. 0 3 kg GaAs( a T = 300 K 3 fg 07345

GPUを用いたN体計算

単精度 190Tflops GPU クラスタ ( 長崎大 ) の紹介 長崎大学工学部超高速メニーコアコンピューティングセンターテニュアトラック助教濱田剛 1 概要 GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) について簡単に説明します. GPU クラスタが得意とする応用問題を議論し 長崎大学での GPU クラスタによる 取組方針 N 体計算の高速化に関する研究内容 を紹介します. まとめ

n ξ n,i, i = 1,, n S n ξ n,i n 0 R 1,.. σ 1 σ i .10.14.15 0 1 0 1 1 3.14 3.18 3.19 3.14 3.14,. ii 1 1 1.1..................................... 1 1............................... 3 1.3.........................

Agenda GRAPE-MPの紹介と性能評価 GRAPE-MPの概要 OpenCLによる四倍精度演算 (preliminary) 4倍精度演算用SIM 加速ボード 6 processor elem with 128 bit logic Peak: 1.2Gflops

Agenda GRAPE-MPの紹介と性能評価 GRAPE-MPの概要 OpenCLによる四倍精度演算 (preliminary) 4倍精度演算用SIM 加速ボード 6 processor elem with 128 bit logic Peak: 1.2Gflops ボードの概要 Control processor (FPGA by Altera) GRAPE-MP chip[nextreme

AHPを用いた大相撲の新しい番付編成

5304050 2008/2/15 1 2008/2/15 2 42 2008/2/15 3 2008/2/15 4 195 2008/2/15 5 2008/2/15 6 i j ij >1 ij ij1/>1 i j i 1 ji 1/ j ij 2008/2/15 7 1 =2.01/=0.5 =1.51/=0.67 2008/2/15 8 1 2008/2/15 9 () u ) i i i

SO(3) 49 u = Ru (6.9), i u iv i = i u iv i (C ) π π : G Hom(V, V ) : g D(g). π : R 3 V : i 1. : u u = u 1 u 2 u 3 (6.10) 6.2 i R α (1) = 0 cos α

SO(3) 48 6 SO(3) t 6.1 u, v u = u 1 1 + u 2 2 + u 3 3 = u 1 e 1 + u 2 e 2 + u 3 e 3, v = v 1 1 + v 2 2 + v 3 3 = v 1 e 1 + v 2 e 2 + v 3 e 3 (6.1) i (e i ) e i e j = i j = δ ij (6.2) ( u, v ) = u v = ij

IA hara@math.kyushu-u.ac.jp Last updated: January,......................................................................................................................................................................................

18 2 F 12 r 2 r 1 (3) Coulomb km Coulomb M = kg F G = ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 = [N]. Coulomb

r 1 r 2 r 1 r 2 2 Coulomb Gauss Coulomb 2.1 Coulomb 1 2 r 1 r 2 1 2 F 12 2 1 F 21 F 12 = F 21 = 1 4πε 0 1 2 r 1 r 2 2 r 1 r 2 r 1 r 2 (2.1) Coulomb ε 0 = 107 4πc 2 =8.854 187 817 10 12 C 2 N 1 m 2 (2.2)

W u = u(x, t) u tt = a 2 u xx, a > 0 (1) D := {(x, t) : 0 x l, t 0} u (0, t) = 0, u (l, t) = 0, t 0 (2)

3 215 4 27 1 1 u u(x, t) u tt a 2 u xx, a > (1) D : {(x, t) : x, t } u (, t), u (, t), t (2) u(x, ) f(x), u(x, ) t 2, x (3) u(x, t) X(x)T (t) u (1) 1 T (t) a 2 T (t) X (x) X(x) α (2) T (t) αa 2 T (t) (4)

k m m d2 x i dt 2 = f i = kx i (i = 1, 2, 3 or x, y, z) f i σ ij x i e ij = 2.1 Hooke s law and elastic constants (a) x i (2.1) k m σ A σ σ σ σ f i x

k m m d2 x i dt 2 = f i = kx i (i = 1, 2, 3 or x, y, z) f i ij x i e ij = 2.1 Hooke s law and elastic constants (a) x i (2.1) k m A f i x i B e e e e 0 e* e e (2.1) e (b) A e = 0 B = 0 (c) (2.1) (d) e

1 filename=mathformula tex 1 ax 2 + bx + c = 0, x = b ± b 2 4ac, (1.1) 2a x 1 + x 2 = b a, x 1x 2 = c a, (1.2) ax 2 + 2b x + c = 0, x = b ± b 2

filename=mathformula58.tex ax + bx + c =, x = b ± b 4ac, (.) a x + x = b a, x x = c a, (.) ax + b x + c =, x = b ± b ac. a (.3). sin(a ± B) = sin A cos B ± cos A sin B, (.) cos(a ± B) = cos A cos B sin

120 9 I I 1 I 2 I 1 I 2 ( a) ( b) ( c ) I I 2 I 1 I ( d) ( e) ( f ) 9.1: Ampère (c) (d) (e) S I 1 I 2 B ds = µ 0 ( I 1 I 2 ) I 1 I 2 B ds =0. I 1 I 2

9 E B 9.1 9.1.1 Ampère Ampère Ampère s law B S µ 0 B ds = µ 0 j ds (9.1) S rot B = µ 0 j (9.2) S Ampère Biot-Savart oulomb Gauss Ampère rot B 0 Ampère µ 0 9.1 (a) (b) I B ds = µ 0 I. I 1 I 2 B ds = µ 0

46 4 E E E E E 0 0 E E = E E E = ) E =0 2) φ = 3) ρ =0 1) 0 2) E φ E = grad φ E =0 P P φ = E ds 0

4 4.1 conductor E E E 4.1: 45 46 4 E E E E E 0 0 E E = E E E =0 4.1.1 1) E =0 2) φ = 3) ρ =0 1) 0 2) E φ E = grad φ E =0 P P φ = E ds 0 4.1 47 0 0 3) ε 0 div E = ρ E =0 ρ =0 0 0 a Q Q/4πa 2 ) r E r 0 Gauss

スライド 1

Matsuura Laboratory SiC SiC 13 2004 10 21 22 H-SiC ( C-SiC HOY Matsuura Laboratory n E C E D ( E F E T Matsuura Laboratory Matsuura Laboratory DLTS Osaka Electro-Communication University Unoped n 3C-SiC

日本内科学会雑誌第102巻第4号

HPC (pay-as-you-go) HPC Web 2

,, 1 HPC (pay-as-you-go) HPC Web 2 HPC Amazon EC2 OpenFOAM GPU EC2 3 HPC MPI MPI Courant 1 GPGPU MPI 4 AMAZON EC2 GPU CLUSTER COMPUTE INSTANCE EC2 GPU (cg1.4xlarge) ( N. Virgina ) Quadcore Intel Xeon 5570

Introduction SFT Tachyon condensation in SFT SFT ( ) at 1 / 38

( ) 2011 5 14 at 1 / 38 Introduction? = String Field Theory = SFT 2 / 38 String Field : ϕ(x, t) x ϕ x / ( ) X ( σ) (string field): Φ[X(σ), t] X(σ) Φ (Φ X(σ) ) X(σ) & / 3 / 38 SFT with Lorentz & Gauge Invariance

1. ( ) 1.1 t + t [m]{ü(t + t)} + [c]{ u(t + t)} + [k]{u(t + t)} = {f(t + t)} (1) m ü f c u k u 1.2 Newmark β (1) (2) ( [m] + t ) 2 [c] + β( t)2

212 1 6 1. (212.8.14) 1 1.1............................................. 1 1.2 Newmark β....................... 1 1.3.................................... 2 1.4 (212.8.19)..................................

B 1 B.1.......................... 1 B.1.1................. 1 B.1.2................. 2 B.2........................... 5 B.2.1.......................... 5 B.2.2.................. 6 B.2.3..................

20 6 4 1 4 1.1 1.................................... 4 1.1.1.................................... 4 1.1.2 1................................ 5 1.2................................... 7 1.2.1....................................

untitled

taisuke@cs.tsukuba.ac.jp http://www.hpcs.is.tsukuba.ac.jp/~taisuke/ CP-PACS HPC PC post CP-PACS CP-PACS II 1990 HPC RWCP, HPC かつての世界最高速計算機も 1996年11月のTOP500 第一位 ピーク性能 614 GFLOPS Linpack性能 368 GFLOPS (地球シミュレータの前

1 I 1.1 ± e = = - = C C MKSA [m], [Kg] [s] [A] 1C 1A 1 MKSA 1C 1C +q q +q q 1

1 I 1.1 ± e = = - =1.602 10 19 C C MKA [m], [Kg] [s] [A] 1C 1A 1 MKA 1C 1C +q q +q q 1 1.1 r 1,2 q 1, q 2 r 12 2 q 1, q 2 2 F 12 = k q 1q 2 r 12 2 (1.1) k 2 k 2 ( r 1 r 2 ) ( r 2 r 1 ) q 1 q 2 (q 1 q 2

ohpr.dvi

2003-08-04 1984 VP-1001 CPU, 250 MFLOPS, 128 MB 2004ASCI Purple (LLNL)64 CPU 197, 100 TFLOPS, 50 TB, 4.5 MW PC 2 CPU 16, 4 GFLOPS, 32 GB, 3.2 kw 20028 CPU 640, 40 TFLOPS, 10 TB, 10 MW (ASCI: Accelerated

HPC pdf

GPU 1 1 2 2 1 1024 3 GPUGraphics Unit1024 3 GPU GPU GPU GPU 1024 3 Tesla S1070-400 1 GPU 2.6 Accelerating Out-of-core Cone Beam Reconstruction Using GPU Yusuke Okitsu, 1 Fumihiko Ino, 1 Taketo Kishi, 2

PowerPoint Presentation

2010 KEK (Japan) (Japan) (Japan) Cheoun, Myun -ki Soongsil (Korea) Ryu,, Chung-Yoe Soongsil (Korea) 1. S.Reddy, M.Prakash and J.M. Lattimer, P.R.D58 #013009 (1998) Magnetar : ~ 10 15 G ~ 10 17 19 G (?)

(2 X Poisso P (λ ϕ X (t = E[e itx ] = k= itk λk e k! e λ = (e it λ k e λ = e eitλ e λ = e λ(eit 1. k! k= 6.7 X N(, 1 ϕ X (t = e 1 2 t2 : Cauchy ϕ X (t

6 6.1 6.1 (1 Z ( X = e Z, Y = Im Z ( Z = X + iy, i = 1 (2 Z E[ e Z ] < E[ Im Z ] < Z E[Z] = E[e Z] + ie[im Z] 6.2 Z E[Z] E[ Z ] : E[ Z ] < e Z Z, Im Z Z E[Z] α = E[Z], Z = Z Z 1 {Z } E[Z] = α = α [ α ]

‚åŁÎ“·„´Šš‡ðŠp‡¢‡½‹âfi`fiI…A…‰…S…−…Y…•‡ÌMarkovŸA“½fiI›ð’Í

Markov 2009 10 2 Markov 2009 10 2 1 / 25 1 (GA) 2 GA 3 4 Markov 2009 10 2 2 / 25 (GA) (GA) L ( 1) I := {0, 1} L f : I (0, ) M( 2) S := I M GA (GA) f (i) i I Markov 2009 10 2 3 / 25 (GA) ρ(i, j), i, j I

LLG-R8.Nisus.pdf

d M d t = γ M H + α M d M d t M γ [ 1/ ( Oe sec) ] α γ γ = gµ B h g g µ B h / π γ g = γ = 1.76 10 [ 7 1/ ( Oe sec) ] α α = λ γ λ λ λ α γ α α H α = γ H ω ω H α α H K K H K / M 1 1 > 0 α 1 M > 0 γ α γ =

2.4 ( ) ( B ) A B F (1) W = B A F dr. A F q dr f(x,y,z) A B Γ( ) Minoru TANAKA (Osaka Univ.) I(2011), Sec p. 1/30

2.4 ( ) 2.4.1 ( B ) A B F (1) W = B A F dr. A F q dr f(x,y,z) A B Γ( ) I(2011), Sec. 2. 4 p. 1/30 (2) Γ f dr lim f i r i. r i 0 i f i i f r i i i+1 (1) n i r i (3) F dr = lim F i n i r i. Γ r i 0 i n i

1 (1) () (3) I 0 3 I I d θ = L () dt θ L L θ I d θ = L = κθ (3) dt κ T I T = π κ (4) T I κ κ κ L l a θ L r δr δl L θ ϕ ϕ = rθ (5) l

1 1 ϕ ϕ ϕ S F F = ϕ (1) S 1: F 1 1 (1) () (3) I 0 3 I I d θ = L () dt θ L L θ I d θ = L = κθ (3) dt κ T I T = π κ (4) T I κ κ κ L l a θ L r δr δl L θ ϕ ϕ = rθ (5) l : l r δr θ πrδr δf (1) (5) δf = ϕ πrδr

Gravothermal Catastrophe & Quasi-equilibrium Structure in N-body Systems

2004/3/1 3 N 1 Antonov Problem & Quasi-equilibrium State in N-body N Systems A. Taruya (RESCEU, Univ.Tokyo) M. Sakagami (Kyoto Univ.) 2 Antonov problem N-body study of quasi-attractivity M15 T Antonov

Microsoft PowerPoint - GPU_computing_2013_01.pptx

GPU コンピューティン No.1 導入 東京工業大学 学術国際情報センター 青木尊之 1 GPU とは 2 GPGPU (General-purpose computing on graphics processing units) GPU を画像処理以外の一般的計算に使う GPU の魅力 高性能 : ハイエンド GPU はピーク 4 TFLOPS 超 手軽さ : 普通の PC にも装着できる 低価格

iphone GPGPU GPU OpenCL Mac OS X Snow LeopardOpenCL iphone OpenCL OpenCL NVIDIA GPU CUDA GPU GPU GPU 15 GPU GPU CPU GPU iii OpenMP MPI CPU OpenCL CUDA OpenCL CPU OpenCL GPU NVIDIA Fermi GPU Fermi GPU GPU

dynamics-solution2.dvi

1 1. (1) a + b = i +3i + k () a b =5i 5j +3k (3) a b =1 (4) a b = 7i j +1k. a = 14 l =/ 14, m=1/ 14, n=3/ 14 3. 4. 5. df (t) d [a(t)e(t)] =ti +9t j +4k, = d a(t) d[a(t)e(t)] e(t)+ da(t) d f (t) =i +18tj

cm λ λ = h/p p ( ) λ = cm E pc [ev] 2.2 quark lepton u d c s t b e 1 3e electric charge e color charge red blue green qq

2007 2007 7 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 1 2007 2 4 5 6 6 2 2.1 1: KEK Web page 1 1 1 10 16 cm λ λ = h/p p ( ) λ = 10 16 cm E pc [ev] 2.2 quark lepton 2 2.2.1 u d c s t b + 2 3 e 1 3e electric charge

JFE.dvi

,, Department of Civil Engineering, Chuo University Kasuga 1-13-27, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 112 8551, JAPAN E-mail : atsu1005@kc.chuo-u.ac.jp E-mail : kawa@civil.chuo-u.ac.jp SATO KOGYO CO., LTD. 12-20, Nihonbashi-Honcho

CP-PACS CP-PACS CP-PACS : 2048PU+128IOU 614GFLOPS peak 128GByte memory 1058GByte disk 1992 1996 SR2201 : 1996 8 9 CP-PACS Top 500 List ranking No. 1 November 1996 Linpack 368.2Gflops No. 24 Novermber 1999