1 1-1 1-2 2 2-1 2-2 3 3-1 3-2 3-3 4 1 1-1 2017 12 5 2018 1 5
Successful Aging Active Aging Ageism Wilkinson & Ferraro 2004 1994 1961 1-2 1961 NIA : National Institute on Aging racism sexism 3
1991 : 9-19 2002 : 43-100 1999 2003, Nelson 2004 2005 2007 1 1968 1999, Aronson 2013 2014
Discrimination Prejudice Stereotype 1 19912002ronson 20132014 2002 : 22-26 Nelson 2004Applewhite 2016 QOL 2 2-1
2-2 CiNii Articles 2017 4 11 91 158 86 90 187 32 3 1 2 1 3-1 1999
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1999 1999 2001 2001 2002 1 FAQ FAQ 2002 2003 3 90 20 2004 2004 9 FAQ FSA 10 2004 25-39 2005 11 2006 12 2006 13 3 FSA ADEA Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 1967 KJ 2006 14 FAQ FSA
2007 15 2007 16 40 FSA 2008 17 25-39 FSA 2009 18 2009 19 2010 20 20-75 FSA 21 2010 FSA, FAQ 22 2011 2011 23 FSA 24 2012 A FSA 25 2012 B FSA, FAQ 26 2013 FSA 27 2015 FSA 2015 28 4 10 40 FSA 29 2015 2016 30 30-59 31 2016 FUMIE 2016 32
90 2002 : 33 32 27 13 13 1999 2007 2009 2016 20062016 9 7 4 4 3 1 2001 2005 2002 2006 2009 2005 2006 2009 2015 2002 2004 2003 21 FSA 1 4 12 FAQ 2 8 4 1
2004 2006 2010 2012 A ; 2012 B ; 2013 2002 2006 2007 2009 FAQ 1999 2004 1999 2003 2006 2002 : 22-26 2002 : 113-162 2003 2009 2015 2003 : 24 3-2 3 FSA FSA 2004 FSA 2007 2012 A ; 2012 B ; 2013
2 2010 : 15 2015 : 246 6 2 2002 2007 2011 2012 B 1 2006 2006 20102016 1999 2002 2016
2015 3-3 2 3 2006 2006 2016 2004 2016 2003 2004 2005 2006 : 87 3 2005 2004 2006 2004 2016 2006 2003 2003 2004 2006 2015 2006 2016 2015 2012 B 2004 2015 2006 2009 2003 2004 2006
2 2004 2015 2015 2003 2004 2006 1 2 2 3-1 2000
20032004 2006 2004 2016 2000 2015 4 65.621 12
3 6 3 1 Iverson 2009 2004 : 12 2016 : 88-89, Berger 2017 : 194-1952006
1 Allport 1954 : 1968, Aronson 2013, Steele 2010 Fraboni Scale of Ageism FSA FSA 2004 The Facts of Aging Quiz
2002 : 317-323 1 4, 5, 9, 13, 14, 16, 17, 20, 21, 23 32 2006 58 51893-1940 201453, 133-146 2001 67, 43-60 2015 86 3240-248 20161 13, 13-23 20114, 27-36 1999 384, 109-118 20011 3 FAQ 12, 35-45 2012 A nursing care research 11 311-19 2012 B nursing care research 11 113-21 2013 13 157-64 200216, 23-42 2010 1 5, 7-16 2011 6, 1-10 20024 11-13 200711 2 56-63 2009 12, 119-130 2010 9, 27-36 2015 5, 93-106 2007 22, 155-1702009 33, 441-452 201515 123-34 2005 7 189-100 2016 32 281-91 2004 Fraboni FSA
26 3308-319 2008 29 4485-492 2006 12, 15-26 1999 43, 109-120 2006 1, 81-88 20166, 25-37 2004 7, 1-14 200320 70, 1-29 2004 53 1163-176 Ashton Applewhite 2016 This Chair Rocks : A Manifesto Against Ageism, Networked Books New York. Claude M. Steele 2010 Whistling Vivaldi : And Other Clues to How Stereotypes Affect Us, WWNorton&Co Inc. Elliot Aronson, T. D. Wilson & R. M. Akert 2013 Social Psychology, 8 th Edition, Pearson Education Inc. Erdman B. Palmore 1990 AGEISM : Negative and Positive, Springer Publishing Company, Inc. B2002 Gordon W. Allport 1954 The nature of prejudice, Mazal Holocaust CollectionG. W. 1968 Jodi A. Wilkinson & K. F. Ferraro 2002 Thirty Years of Ageism Research, Todd D. Nelson Ed., AGEISM : Stereotyping and Prejudice against Older Persons, The MIT Press. Maryann Fraboni, R. Saltstone & S. Hughes 1990 The Fraboni scale of ageism FSAanattemptatamore precise measure of ageism, Canadian Journal on Aging, 9 1, 56-66. Nancy J. Osgood 1992 SUICIDE IN LATER LIFE : Recognizing the Warning Signs, Lexington Books. J1994 Raqota Berger 2017 Aging in America : Ageism and general attitudes toward growing old and the elderly, Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5, 183-198. Robert N. Butler 1975 Why Survive? : Being old in America, HARPER & ROW 1991 Robert Brown 1995 Prejudice : Its Social Psychology, Oxford : Blackwell PublishersR 1999 Thomas N. Iversen, L. Larsen & P. E. Solem 2009 A Conceptual analysis of Ageism, Nordic Psychology, 61 3, 4-22.
Review of Japanese Ageism Research : Focusing on the Structure of Ageism Concept Hyebin Park The purpose of this paper is to review the research on ageism study in Japan. First, we examine the total tendency of the advanced researches on ageism. Second, we identify the outcomes and remaining issues by reviewing with the analytical framework made by components of ageism. As the result of our analysis, we found that data about various individuals views toward aging have been accumulated. Theoretical consideration about ageism, however, is insufficient. Perhaps as a result of it, Japanese researches on ageism tend to limit their research focuses only to psychological aspects, but not societal and cultural aspects. It is suggested that research on ageism should have more comprehensive research framework with cultural and societal aspects as well as individual psychological aspects. Key words : Ageism, Attitudes toward the elderly, Stereotype, Prejudice, Discrimination