Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C

Similar documents
Keynes 1936 Tobin 1 Hicks 1937 Keynes IS LM 2 IS LM 3 IS LM Keynes Keynes animal spirits

aragciv54mac.dvi

shuron.dvi

【表紙】経済学論叢_18号/表1・3・背

Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) ,

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察

(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008)

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

Masahiro NAKANO Keynes benchmark Keynes 89

1. R n Ω ε G ε 0 Ω ε B n 2 Ωε = with Bu = 0 on Ω ε i=1 x 2 i ε +0 B Bu = u (Dirichlet, D Ω ε ), Bu = u ν (Neumann, N Ω ε ), Ω ε G ( ) / 25

中京大学経済学論叢 23 号 2012 年 3 月 審査論文 1 Keywords: JEL Classi cation: L13, L22, L33 1 * *1 Inoue, Kamijo, and Tomaru (2009) Mukherjee and Suestrong

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right


財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察


株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─

時間割引:双曲割引と弱加法性

meiji_resume_1.PDF

DGE DGE (1) ( 1

アロー『やってみて学習』から学習:経済成長にとっての教訓 Learning from `Learning by Doing': Lessons for Economic Growth

I ( ) 1 de Broglie 1 (de Broglie) p λ k h Planck ( Js) p = h λ = k (1) h 2π : Dirac k B Boltzmann ( J/K) T U = 3 2 k BT

濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G

sakigake1.dvi

2015 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1

ú r(ú) t n [;t] [;t=n]; (t=n; 2t=n]; (2t=n; 3t=n];:::; ((nä 1)t=n;t] n t 1 (nä1)t=n e Är(t)=n (nä 2)t=n e Är(t)=n e Är((nÄ1)t=n)=n t e Är(t)=n e Är((n

曲面のパラメタ表示と接線ベクトル

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程

untitled

bottleneckjapanese.dvi

2 / 24

LA-VAR Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2)

Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC

() x + y + y + x dy dx = 0 () dy + xy = x dx y + x y ( 5) ( s55906) 0.7. (). 5 (). ( 6) ( s6590) 0.8 m n. 0.9 n n A. ( 6) ( s6590) f A (λ) = det(a λi)

PFI

2 1 κ c(t) = (x(t), y(t)) ( ) det(c (t), c x (t)) = det (t) x (t) y (t) y = x (t)y (t) x (t)y (t), (t) c (t) = (x (t)) 2 + (y (t)) 2. c (t) =

N/m f x x L dl U 1 du = T ds pdv + fdl (2.1)

GDPギャップと潜在成長率

SO(3) 7 = = 1 ( r ) + 1 r r r r ( l ) (5.17) l = 1 ( sin θ ) + sin θ θ θ ϕ (5.18) χ(r)ψ(θ, ϕ) l ψ = αψ (5.19) l 1 = i(sin ϕ θ l = i( cos ϕ θ l 3 = i ϕ


Transcription:

27 nabe@ier.hit-u.ac.jp 27 4 3 Jorgenson Tobin q : Hayashi s Theorem Jordan Saddle Path. GDP % GDP 2. 3. 4.. Tobin q 2 2.

Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? CES Y = A a b ψ + a bl ψ /ψ 6 < a, b <, ψ < / ψ ψ Y = Const a L a CES Inada CES F = A a b ψ + a bl ψ ψ/ψ ψ ab b 7 < ψ < lim F > lim F = ψ < lim F = lim F < CES Inada lim k F k = * * CES Translog CES, L, Y PC missing variables 2

2.2 Jorgenson *2 r Y w Minimize wl + r 8 s.t.f, L = Y 9,F, L = A a L a = ay /r r? I d dt Jorgenson 963 t = t λ 2 λ < λ < t t λ ln ln = λ ln t ln 3 λ t *2 Tobin q 984 3

Time to build 2.3 Tobin q Tobin Jorgenson Tobin q q + q = 4 q *3 q q *4 q q + q = 5 *5 *3 *4 irreversible investment irreversibility Dixit and Pindyck 992 26 BOJ Working Paper6-J-9 *5 q 4

q q *6 q q q Tobin q Tobin q 3 Jorgenson Tobin q 3. 3.. 4 irreversibility *6 989 5

*7 *8 3..2 r = + r 6 r/2 = + r 2 2 7 t lim n + r n nt 8 + r nt = n + r n nt 9 m = n r 2 *9 + r nt = + m rt 2 n m *7 Perko 99 *8 *9 r 6

lim n + r n nt = lim + m rt 22 m m e e lim + m 23 m m t lim n + r n nt = e rt 24 r r rt t t s= r s ds 25 [ e R t ] t s= rsds = exp r s ds s= 26 r t s= r s ds = rt 27 3..3 t π I t It φ I t 28 t It π I t φ I t 29 π >, π < I t φ > 3 φ = 3 7

2φ It + φ > 32 lim x xφ x = 33 Romer24 Lucas Uzawa 3..4 t I t I t = + 34? r t 8

+ r t+ r t 2 [ It π I t φ I t + π + I t+ φ + r t+ It+ + I t+ ] 35 2 s [ ] It+s π +s I t+s φ I t+s + r t+m +s s= m= 36 s= s [ ] It+s π +s I t+s φ I t+s + r +s 37 I t = + for all t 38 2 Policy Function Max s= s [ ] It+s π +s I t+s φ I t+s + r +s 39 s.t. I t = + for all t 4 λ t L = s= s [ ] It+s π +s I t+s φ I t+s + r +s q + λ t+s I t+s +s+ + +s 4 s= q t+s = + r s λ t 42 L = s= s [ ] It+s π +s I t+s φ I t+s + q t+s I t+s +s+ + +s + r +s 43 9

s= I t φ I t φ + q t = 44 q t = + φ + I t φ 45 q + + 2 q t+ = q t+ q t 2 π + It+ + φ + q t+ + r q t = 46 + 2 π + It+ + φ = rq t+ q t+ r q t+ 47 + * t+ t+ q t q t+ > q t+ q T T T+ T q T q T T = 48 + r t lim q t = 49 t + r Transversality Condition * * * Arrow and urz97

3..5 s= s [ ] It+s π +s I t+s φ I t+s + r +s 5 e e π rt It I t φ I t dt 5 t= d dt = I t 52 * 2 It H = π I t φ I t + q t I t 53 q t = + φ + I t φ 54 q t rq t = H 55 2 π It + φ = rq t q 56 t lim t e rt q t = 57 *2 995

3..6 T e π rt It I t φ I t dt 58 d dt = I t 59 L = T T e rt T e π rt It I t φ I t dt + e rt q t I t t dt + λ T e rt q t λ I t t t T e rt q t dt = [ e rt ] T T q t e rt q t t dt = e rt q T T q T e rt q t t dt L = L = T + q + T e π rt It I t φ T e rt q t t dt + λ T e rt e rt π I t φ It + λ T e rt e rt q T T + q π + It T I t dt + e rt q t I t dt e rt q T T I t + q t I t rq t q t dt 2 φ rq t q t = 2 rq t q t = π It + φ 2

I t φ I t φ + q t = 3..7 Tobin Q φ I/ I/ q t = + φ + I t φ 6 2φ + It φ 6 I/ q I t = h q t, h >, h = 62 q q q I/ q h q I/ q q Tobin q I/ q q q I/ q I/ q q Tobin q q q q 982 q q. 2. 3. 3 q q 2 F,L 3

q t = rq t F 2 It φ 63 q t = q t + t q t 64 2 It = φ 65 rq F + I + φ + I t φ 66 = rq + I + φ F, L + wl 67 t cashflow = π t = F, L I + φ wl 68 q t = rq π t 69 x t = q t x t = rx t π t 7 rx t e rt xt rx t e rt = e rt π t 7 de rt x t dt = e rt π t 72 t= de rt x t dt = e rt π t dt 73 dt t= lim t e rt x t x = e rt π t dt 74 t= q = t= e rt π t dt 75 q = t= e rt π t dt 76 Tobin q q q q q 4

982 q q q * 3 4 = h q t 77 2 q t = rq t π It φ 78 lim t e rt q t = 79 77 78 h q t > q t > 8 q q 2 q t > rq t > π It + φ 8 q q q q t = = q q = q= q q q t = q *3 q q q 5

saddle path 4. 2 f, g = f, q 82 q, Taylor q t = g, q 83 = f q, + f k q, + fq q, q q 84 q = g q, + g k q, + gq q, q q 85 q, q fk q, = g k q, f q q, g q q, q q 86 =, q = h q = r = π, q =, φ + φ + I φ = 2φ q = 2φ π r q q λ, λ 2 P, P 2 P = P, P 2 * 4 2φ λ π = P P 88 r λ 2 87 q λ = P λ 2 P q q 89 *4 2 2 6

P q λ = λ 2 P q q 9 z z 2 P q q 9 z z 2 = P q 92 z z 2 λ = λ 2 z z 2 93 z t = e λt z 94 z 2t = e λ 2t z 2 95 P P P = 2 P 2 P 22 96 = P e λt z + P 2 e λ2t z 2 97 q t q = P 2 e λt z + P 22 e λ2t z 2 98 λ, λ 2 q P z q λ < < λ 2 P 2 z 2 P 22 z 2 z 2 = P q q 2 = 99 q saddle path saddle P P P = 2 P 2 P 22 saddle path P 2 + P 22 q q = 7

λ λ 2 = π 2φ < saddle * 5 saddle saddle saddle saddle saddle q?q 78 q saddle path saddle path saddle? 4.2 saddle path π 2 q t = q? q q q q q saddle path q q 5 Adda and Copper23 *5 8

984 992 q Hayashi, F., Tobin s Marginal q and Average q: A Neoclassical Interpretation, Econometrica, 5, January, 982. Hyashi & Inoue Hayashi, F., and T. Inoue, The Relation between Firm Growth and Q with Multiple Captial Goods: Theory and Evidence from Panel Data on Japanese Firms, Econometrica, 59, 3, 99. Tobin q Hoshi, T., A. ashayp and D. Sharfstein, Corporate Structure, Liquidity and Investment: Evidence from Japanese Industrial Groups, Quarterly Journal of Economics, February, 99. irreversible investment Dixit, A., and R. Pindyck, 994 Investment under Uncertaintiy, Princeton, NJ: Princenton University Press. Cabellero Handbook of Macroeconomics Caballero, R.J., 999, Aggergate Investment, in Taylor and Woodford ed, Handbook of Macroeconomics, B, North-Holland. Perko, L., 99 Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, Springer-Verlag. 8 995 Arrow,.J., and M. urz, 97, Public Investment, the Rate of Return, and Optimal Fiscal Policy, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press. appendix Barro, J.R., and X. Sala-I-Martin., 995 Economic Growth, New York; NY, McGraw Hill. 9

q q = = 2 q q = = q q = =