Similar documents
(EHChamberlin) (ESMason) (JSBain) (RECaves) (CKaysen) (DFTurner) (FMScherer) (1) - (2) (1) (Structure) (2) (Conduct) (3) (Performance) (S

ERINA Report

2 / 24

<96D889BA904D2E696E6464>

GDPギャップと潜在成長率

2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom

bottleneckjapanese.dvi


Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

Y-...W

昭和恐慌期における長野県下農業・農村と産業組合の展開過程

- March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade

39-3/2.論説:藤井・戸前・山本・井上

2

z.prn(Gray)

社会システム研究21_ 畠山.indd

(’Ó)”R

平成12年度 対日直接投資増加の理由と日本経済にもたらす影響に関する調査 第2章 対日投資と多国籍企業の戦略について


JICA JETRO

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

Consideration of Cycle in Efficiency of Minority Game T. Harada and T. Murata (Kansai University) Abstract In this study, we observe cycle in efficien

13....*PDF.p

Microsoft Word - 荳ュ蟲カ諱オ

Sport and the Media: The Close Relationship between Sport and Broadcasting SUDO, Haruo1) Abstract This report tries to demonstrate the relationship be

- March

新製品開発プロジェクトの評価手法

OSIPPニュースレター.indd

中小企業の量的成長と質的成長 Size Growth and Capability Growth by Small Firms 髙橋美樹 (Miki Takahashi) 企業の成長には2つの側面があり 従業員数や資本金 売上高でみた量的な側面と イノベーション創出能力あるいは組織能力でみた質的な側

<332D985F95B62D8FAC93638BA795DB90E690B62E706466>

総研大文化科学研究第 11 号 (2015)

Phonetic Perception and Phonemic Percepition

日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析

高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―

”Y‰Æ”ЛïŸ_‘W40−ª3/ ’¼„´

評論・社会科学 116号(P)Y☆/1.郭

Vol.2.indb

中国市場における日系・欧米系企業の戦略比較


〈論文〉組織改革の成果に関する予備的調査--社内カンパニー制導入が財務的業績に与える影響

161 J 1 J 1997 FC 1998 J J J J J2 J1 J2 J1 J2 J1 J J1 J1 J J 2011 FIFA 2012 J 40 56

阿部Doc

橡最終原稿.PDF

産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf

28_3-03-伊勢坊 中原先生-原著③.indd


施 ほか/3-18

untitled

untitled

untitled

1


Walter et al. 2009: 1 Helleiner 1994 Strange 1971: Gilpin 1987: -65 Strange b, 1998c,

OECD Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. Mottla and Utkus Rooiji et al. Atkinson et al. MacFarland et al. Elton et al. Tang et al. Benartzi and Thaler Br

表紙_目次.PDF


untitled


BJ-No.7 01 三好秀和.indd

:

J No J. J


物流からみた九州地方の地域的都市システムの変容

PDFŠpŒ{Ł¶

MRI | 所報 | 分権経営の進展下におけるグループ・マネジメント

66-5 足代訓史.pwd

...

時間割引:双曲割引と弱加法性

村本 孜51‐85/51‐85

06’ÓŠ¹/ŒØŒì

framing 2 3 reframing 4 LRT LRT LRT LRT 5 2LRT LRT 2.1 LRT JR JR8.0km 45, JR LRT LRT JR3 5 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000


本文.indd


ボーナス制度と家計貯蓄率-サーベイ・データによる再検証-

46

Ł\1,4.ai

     ステイクホルダー理論の展開に関する一考察

大学論集第42号本文.indb

<346B5F BC8CC389AE91E58A A AD985F8F D A967B95B62E696E6462>



金/金

NIES ASEAN4.. NIES.....EU.. ASEAN4 NIES

人文地理62巻4号

<303288C991BD946797C797592E696E6464>


untitled

ワールド・ワイド 10‐2(P)/3.中尾

, 3 2 Marshall [1890]1920, Marshall [1890]1920

福岡大学 商学論叢 第48巻 第2号

物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―


先端社会研究所紀要 第9号☆/2.島村

5 西村成弘/P62‐78

SPA H&M ZARA ZARA ZARA DHL Door-to-door 2

未婚者の恋愛行動分析 : なぜ適当な相手にめぐり会わないのか

OSIPP40_p1_2.eps


untitled

Transcription:

1970). Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C. and R. D. Willig (1982); Contestable Markets and The Theory of Industry Structure, 1982. Caves, R. and M. E. Porter (1977); From entry barriers to mobility barriers: conjectural decisions and contrived deterrence to new competition, Quarterly Journal of Economics, May 1977. Comanar, W. S. and H. E. Frech (1984); Strategic behavior and antitrust analysis, American Economic Review, May 1984. Dixit, A. (1982); Recent development in oligopoly theory, American Economic Review, May 1982. Geroski, P. A, and A. Jacquemin (1984); Dominant firms and their alleged decline, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1984 (2). Geroski, P. A., Phlips, L. and A. Ulph (1985); Oligopoly, competition and welfare: some recent developments, Journal of Industrial Economics, June 1985. Kaysen, C. and D. F. Turner (1959); Antitrust Policy, 1959. Kreps, D. M. and A. M. Spence (1983); Modelling the role of history in industrial organization and competition, Harvard Univ. Discussion Paper, July 1983. Phillips, A. (1970); Structure, conduct, and performance-and performance, conduct, and structure (in, Industrial Organization and Economic Development, ed. by J. W. Markham et al., 1970). 1982). Porter, M. E. (1981); Strategic interaction: some lessons from industry histories for theory and antitrust policy (in, Strategy, Predation, and Antitrust Analysis, ed. by S. C. Salop, FTC Report, 1981). Porter, M. E. (1982); Industrial organization and the evolution of concept for strategic planning (in, Corporate Strategy, The Integration of Corporate Planning Models and Economiccs, ed. by T. H. Naylor, 1982). Salop, S. C. (1979); Strategic entry deterrence, American Economic Review, May 1979. Scherer, F. M. [1970); Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 1970, 2nd ed. 1980. Schmalensee, R. [1982a); The new industrial organization and the economic analysis of modern markets (in, Advances in Economic Theory, ed by W. Hildenbrand, 1982). Schmalensee, R. (1982b); Antitrust and the new industrial economics, American Economic Review, 33

May 1982. Shepard, W. G. (1984); "Contestability" vs. competition, American Economic Review, Sept. 1984. Spence, A. M. (1981); Competition, entry, and antitrust policy (in, Strategy, Predation and Antitrust Analysis, ed. by Salop, 1981). Williamson, O. E. (1983); Antitrust enforcement: where it has been; where it is going (in, Industrial Organization, Antitrust, and Public Policy, ed. by J. V. Craven, 1983).

Recent Developments in Industrial Organization: Their lmplication for Advancement of Industrial studies Minoru Nishida This is an enlarged paper, the draft of which was read at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial Studies (Japan) on December 1, 1985 in Tokyo. In this paper, I intend to investigate the recent trends of industrial organization economics in the United States of America, in order to help us consider on the future course of our industrial studies. Here, we focus on three aspects, interrelated to each others, of the new trends in industrial organization: towards studies of strategic behavior, analysis of dynamic process of oligopolistic market and competition, and adopting a case study approach rather than cross sectional approach. Specifically, I emphasize the importance of introducing a factor of "learning-by-doing", or learning curve, in dynamic analysis of Japanese manufacturing industries, in the view of a greater role of cummulative improvements to increase efficiency and competitiveness in those industries, for instance, in consumer video casset recorder. And, in relation to this, I suggest that the recent coflicts of "dumping problem" between U. S. and Japanese industries should be analyzed with a dynamic approach of learning curve economies. {Osaka City University} 61