1789 EU 36,000 EU 1,600EU 4, ,5002, ,

Similar documents
1982 Loi d'orientation des transports intérieursloti 28 PDUPlans de déplacements urbains 5 PDU PDU PDU 2 3 PDU PDU4 PDU 5 PDU 6 PDU PDU 2 PDU

地方債と地方財政規律

) ,

先端社会研究 ★5★号/4.山崎


framing 2 3 reframing 4 LRT LRT LRT LRT 5 2LRT LRT 2.1 LRT JR JR8.0km 45, JR LRT LRT JR3 5 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000

KII, Masanobu Vol.7 No Spring

<8D918DDB926E88E68CA48B86985F8F572D8D8791CC2E696E6462>

<303288C991BD946797C797592E696E6464>

untitled

10-渡部芳栄.indd

*.E (..).R

....13_ /...X.{.q

untitled

DI DI


グローバル化時代における日本の労働市場と留学生をめぐる考察

PDFóp

仏大 総合研究所・紀要21号☆/1.大藪



-February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs

Trans European Networks TENs TENs 90 TENs TEN T 1997 TEN T TEN T CEC, TEN T TEN T 1996TEN T Pan-European Transport

関西における地域銀行について

_加登田先生_責.indd

262 F s PRO A Community Investment and the Role of Non-profit Organizations: Present Conditions in the US, the UK, and Japan Takashi Koseki Abstract 1

- June LRT Light Rail TransitLRT LRT LRT LRT LRT LRT LRT LRT LRT LRT modern tramways LRT


<332D985F95B62D8FAC93638BA795DB90E690B62E706466>

This paper examines the difficulty of dark tourism from findings of the field survey on industrial heritage. Such difficulty comes from an unfavorable

- March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade

_’¼Œì

LRT LRT 9 N LRT LRT km km 17 18km Vol.7 No.3 200

,,.,,.,..,.,,,.,, Aldous,.,,.,,.,,, NPO,,.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,..,,,,.,

Microsoft PowerPoint - TIFF2012

01[ ]高木(責).indd

160203_02_kojima_四_e.indd


Table 1 Utilization of Data for River Water Table 2 Utilization of Data for Groundwater Quality Analysis5,6,9,10,13,14) Quality Analysis5-13) Fig. 1 G

Core Ethics Vol. -

大学論集第42号本文.indb

生駒山麓の遊園・観光開発計画の蹉跌 - 日下温泉土地を中心として -

Sport and the Media: The Close Relationship between Sport and Broadcasting SUDO, Haruo1) Abstract This report tries to demonstrate the relationship be

Core Ethics Vol.

農林水産政策研究所レビューNo.11

<835A837E B944E95F E2E696E6462>

Japanese Journal of Family Sociology, 29(1): (2017)


鹿大広報149号

175 資 料 12 翻訳の趣旨 Recueil Dalloz Émilie PECQUEUR, Anne CARON-DÉGLISE et Thierry VERHEYDE, Capacité juridique et protection juridique à la lumière de la


抜刷表紙/芦塚 〃 嶋崎 芦塚

WASEDA RILAS JOURNAL : :

11_渡辺_紀要_2007

,

untitled

(2) IPP Independent Power Producers IPP 1995 NCC(New Common Carrier NCC NTT NTT NCC NTT NTT IPP 2. IPP (3) [1] [2] IPP [2] IPP IPP [1] [2]

Core Ethics Vol. QOL N N N N N N N K N N

宮本/宮本

大学における原価計算教育の現状と課題

„h‹¤.05.07


A Study of the Comprehensive Framework of Action for Job Retention amongst the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Makoto IWAYAMA Abstract The purpose of this pa

WASEDA RILAS JOURNAL

首都直下地震における地方財政への影響

IR0036_62-3.indb

Vol. 45 No Web ) 3) ),5) 1 Fig. 1 The Official Gazette. WTO A

在日外国人高齢者福祉給付金制度の創設とその課題



人文論究60-1(よこ)(P)/2.阿河

Core Ethics Vol. Nerriere D.Hon EU GS NPO GS GS Oklahoma State University Kyoto Branch OSU-K OSU-K OSU-K

ヨーロッパの景観規制制度-「景観緑三法」提出に関連して-

- March

KOZO


untitled

社会学部紀要 117号☆/1.野瀬



先端社会研究所紀要 第9号☆/2.島村

121

<30372D985F95B62D8E52967B8C4F8E7190E690B62E706466>

Fig. 1 Trends of TB incidence rates for all forms and smear-positive pulmonary TB in Kawasaki City and Japan. Incidence=newly notified cases of all fo

Bull. of Nippon Sport Sci. Univ. 47 (1) Devising musical expression in teaching methods for elementary music An attempt at shared teaching


国際社会文化研究所紀要 14号☆/目次

..8../

43 + +* / +3+0,, 22*,, ++..0/ / 1/. / / + /* *,* +* *.* /* *,/./ +3+,. + : / 3 / +** +**, // /. /+ /+ + * * ,* , 0.. /3 : +/,.

”Y‰Æ”ЛïŸ_‘W40−ª3/ ’¼„´

Phonetic Perception and Phonemic Percepition

阿部Doc

NIES ASEAN4.. NIES.....EU.. ASEAN4 NIES

英国の交通政策

Core Ethics Vol.

La Societe Japonaise de Didactique du Francais Notes de recherche (Analyse des méthodes et élaboration des procédures pédagoqiques) HIRASHIMA Rika Rés

Abstract Objectives: This article presents a review of cancer control measures implemented in Phase One of the National Cancer Control Plan (

Web Web Web Web Web, i

Vol.2.indb

IASC mm 1,000mm m 1 Dr. Marri Channa Reddy Human Resource Development Institute of Andhra Pra

Transcription:

1980 2003 19565 1980 2003 ITO, Makoto 1 2 1980 2003 19565 2003 2 31982 2003 4 2 2.1 4 2 552km 2 1.47 6,0001/2 107/km 2 30 2.2 3 3 Vol.10 No.2 2007 Summer 007

1789 EU 36,000 EU 1,600EU 4,600 1 18,5002,500 12 3.5 1009641 60270 200 1950 1972 1982 22 42 1,000 600 4501 100 30100 1030 510 35 3 3 13 50001 30005000 20003000 10002000 5001000 100500 100 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 219992002 3.1 1789 15024 1946 5 1958 008 Vol.10 No.2 2007 Summer

Vol.10 No.2 2007 Summer 009 3 3.2 1964 1969 1971716 197275 4 1974 3.3 1980 19823 km 2 /km 2 2,908 1,734 10,952 1,780 1,309 260 2,440 1,342 3,997 1,422 1,857 1,117 1,610 2,906 4,506 3,222 1,640 2,552 2,296 711 5,645 729 58,518 41.3 8.3 12.0 12.3 26.0 8.7 39.2 25.6 12.4 17.6 19.4 16.2 31.6 27.2 31.4 32.1 25.8 45.3 27.4 16.9 43.7 23.5 544.0 70 209 912 145 50 30 62 52 322 81 96 69 51 107 144 100 64 56 84 42 129 31 108 51999

2 3 1982729 198317 1983722 1985 19821986 48269 3 1986 1988 1988 1992 2002 pole 8 1999712 505 3 2004 80 14 3.4 5 3.4.1 5 19822003 3 5 1112 1 72 722 7272-2 010 Vol.10 No.2 2007 Summer

724 39 72 72-2 3.4.2 200372-2 2004 2003 4 19995 2003 2003 28 3.4.3 2004813 1983 2 20051 13 TIPP TCA 3.4.4 5 3, PMIRMA 131429 Vol.10 No.2 2007 Summer 011

1 17 3.5 1982 3.5.1 LOTI LOTI1982 PDU 1970 303132 3.5.2 19952 2 50km 45 1999 99-533 219 9 3.5.3 51 10 PDU 3.5.4 19972 012 Vol.10 No.2 2007 Summer

RFF SNCF RFF RFF SNCF 3 3.5.5 200012 SRU Syndicat mixte 3.5.6 3.5.1 18 201999 14-1 2000 4 1982 2003 13 4.1 4.1.1 1960 33 10,000km 27,000km360,000km 590,000km 9,000km 14,000km130,000km990,000km 3 4.1.2 2003 1 Vol.10 No.2 2007 Summer 013

2 km 10,225 26,577 359,100 590,000 EU 10 3 3 18 11 200811 12 2 4.2 4.2.1 PUD 1970 1994 1996 10 LRT LRT 2 325051 014 Vol.10 No.2 2007 Summer

Vol.10 No.2 2007 Summer 015 VEORIA TransportKEOLIS TRANSDEV3 RFFSNCF RFF33,000km SNCF72.22003 JR20,000km 86SNCF 1970 1970 4.2.2 197275 1970 1980 1982 SNCF 4.2.3 1995 1996 71997 VEOLIA Transport 26% KEOLIS 36% TRANSDEV 16% 12% AGIR 10% 53 375455 RFF

SNCF SNCF 1999 2000 11 TERTransport Express Regional 4 TER 5 4.3 4.3.1 140 10014 125 20045 752 60 6 7 6411 10 11 2 1599 Vol.10 No.2 2007 Summer 016 km km km 44km/km/ 295 258 186 322 206 414 131 127 208 71 284 285 85 190 406 217 351 85 322 814 628 1,490 1,000 1,213 1,193 1,600 1,057 855 1,474 1,108 1,848 1,485 751 523 1,300 1,167 1,122 714 1,015 2,600 161 163 101 163 137 160 77 72 139 87 169 176 46 70 211 128 176 79 136 265 8,647 6,914 6,470 8,725 6,270 13,711 4,410 4,768 5,628 3,555 7,357 7,954 2,831 2,860 11,525 7,278 8,019 2,374 10,111 23,200 553,924 404,522 227,732 521,728 362,129 796,496 184,766 168,683 346,861 85,807 397,805 485,096 132,738 175,749 906,247 478,149 722,221 107,980 790,198 1,631,800 2,417 744 624 1,178 832 1,364 479 541 645 212 590 895 484 921 1,910 1,123 1,764 414 2,133 1,719 57 12 12 750 350 2001 442004 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

200711 1898 1001993 67 4.3.2 1 15 3% 10% 6% 11% 2% 4% 64% 70 2 200671 1 6 3 200671 3 3 Vol.10 No.2 2007 Summer 017

4 2 1 20061231 20061231 6 5 24 20061231 2006630 4.4 4.4.1 32002 14 8,900 6,40064,400 11 8 1980 6 121 1 1 0 20 40 60 80 100 100/ 76 018 Vol.10 No.2 2007 Summer

1980 7879 4.4.2 1 200711 2 20061 1 6 2006 11 20061231 6 3 3 4 20071231 5 5 1980 2003 EU 1982 Vol.10 No.2 2007 Summer 019

EU 1Insee Franche-Comté-conribution au SRADI2005 Schéma Régional d Aménagement et de Dévelopment du Territoire (SRADT) 22002 32004 4Ministère de I Intérieur2004Intercommunalité: vers une couverture complète du territoire 52004 62004 71997 81996 91998 102003 11Loi constitutionnelle relative à l organisation décentralisée de la République 2003 12La Constitution1958 13Loi relative aux libertés et responsabilités locales2004 14Limousin 152005 162003 1720031 182003 192003 202003ISSUE BRIEF 2120031 222004 2 232004 2 242004 1 252004 2 262004 2 272005 282004 292005 302003 31 322005 33Economic and Financial Data for France, National Institute for Statistics and Economic Studies 34Aurelie MERCIER2004, La décentralisation des transports en France 35IDI-EUROPE 36Ministère de l Equipement, des Transports et du Logement2003. La Route en France 37RFF Home page2004 38SNCF2004, SNCF Annual Report 2001 39Francois Batisse 1996, Restructuring of Railways in France: Salvage Operation, Japan Railway & Transport Review, JRTR 40Francois Batisse2003, Has rail transport decentralization reached its limits?, Rail International 41City of Strasbourg WEB sight2004 42Region Nord-Pas de Calais WEB sight2004 43TER-SNCF WEB sight2004 44Ville Transports magazine2005le PALMARÈS 2005 DES TER 452004 461998 47Benoît THOMÉ2001, Local public transport organisation in France A new deal?- 482001 491997 ITPS-Report 502003 512002 522003PDU 28 53union des Transport Public2007, Le transport public 542005 55Décret n 2001-1116 novembre 2001, relatif au transfert de compétences en matière de transports collectifs d intérêt régional 56http://www.elunet.org/elu/dossiers/regionalisation.htm 57Regionalisation: Une nouvelle voie vers la décentralisation 581989. / 020 Vol.10 No.2 2007 Summer

59-1989.Nord-Pas-de-Calais 601985 612000 No.1 621999 632003 642003 651991EC 661998 671991 682000 69LES AEROPORTS FRANCAIS2004, UCCEGA 70UCCEGA,LES,AÉROPORTS FRANÇAIS2002, Le Livre Blanc des grands aéroports régionaux français 71LE TRANSPORT AÉERIEN A CONTINUÉ SA CROISSANCE EN 20052006, Direction générale de L Aviation civile 72EU2004, Air passenger transport by reporting country, eurostat 732004 74The National Magazine Co.Ltd, Containerisation International Yearbook 2005 75www.port.fr/manche/ports/tableau.himl 76http://epp.eurostat.cec.eu.int/extraction/retrieve/en/theme7/maritime/ 772003 782003 792003 802004 1 812004 1 822004 3 832002 842001 8520062006 Decentralization of Authorities in France: Implications for Transport Sectors By Makoto ITO Most developed countries have adopted decentralization in political system delegating many authorities to local government. However, in France and Japan many authorities are still with central government. But France started the movement to decentralize their system from the beginning of 1980. They enacted many laws for decentralization. And finally to legitimize decentralization fully, the Constitution of the Fifth Republic, which has been promulgated in 1956 was amended in 2003. In order to realize the spirits of this constitution, many laws have been enacted. These laws transfer many authorities on transports from central government to local governments. While promoting the decentralization of authorities in Japan, those French experiences are very much valuable. The purposes of this research are, especially focusing on transportation field, firstly to show an overview of the decentralization of political system in France, which started from the beginning of 1980, and then to examine clearly the policy and authorities devolved after the amendment of Republic s constitution in 2003. Key Words : France, Transport, Decentralization Vol.10 No.2 2007 Summer 021