<4D F736F F D B78AFA91B691B18AE98BC682A982E78A7782D490568B4B8E968BC6916E91A22E646F6378>

Similar documents
Blue Ocean Strategy W. Chan Kim A. Mauborgne INSEAD INSEAD Production and Operations Management PhD Value Innovation Kim & Mauborgne, 1997

untitled

IMF World Economic Outlook, April GDP GDP.,,,,,..,.

untitled

untitled

Mintzberg a, b 2017a, b Schmitt2000 Pine&Gilmore1999, 2011 Schmitt2000 CreatorEncounter

商学 66‐2☆/3.大原

Kyoto Sangyo University Slywotzky and Morrison 1997 Slywotzky ,2001, ,550 6, ,87

01_芦澤成光①.indd

,

コピー (7) ~ PDF.ren

ハイコミットメントモデルの有効性についての考察 

社会システム研究21_ 畠山.indd

橡最終原稿.PDF

2 33,**. + : +/* /++** +/* /++** +/* /++** /** /** F+ +*** F+ +*** / 1*42.,43 /14+,*42 /, , 134,.,43 / 0-41,*42.4, -/41,*43,34,,+4. +

Core Ethics Vol.

16_.....E...._.I.v2006


39-3/2.論説:藤井・戸前・山本・井上

65-5 足代訓史.pwd

, , , ,

小売業におけるPB戦略とストアロイヤルティ

21世紀紀要12号.indb

DI DI

新製品開発プロジェクトの評価手法

JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 122 Vol.31 No.22011

供給進化とマーケティング対応 : ゲーム産業を事例として

, IT.,.,..,.. i

- March

’ÓŠ¹/‰´„û

IKEA 7 IKEA IKEA HP

総 説 6 6 PIMs P S J 7

海保英孝223‐241/223‐241

Microsoft Word - 荳ュ蟲カ諱オ



先端社会研究 ★5★号/4.山崎

日本感性工学会論文誌

5 5 5 Barnes et al

43 + +* / +3+0,, 22*,, ++..0/ / 1/. / / + /* *,* +* *.* /* *,/./ +3+,. + : / 3 / +** +**, // /. /+ /+ + * * ,* , 0.. /3 : +/,.

Article The Concerns and the Effects about Telework From the Results of Questionnaire Method Yasuhiro Furukawa In this study, I researched the current



大学論集第42号本文.indb

人文地理62巻4号

KII, Masanobu Vol.7 No Spring

”Лï−wŁfl‰IŠv‚æ84“ƒ/’¼”Rflü“º”q

IT i

22SPC4報告書

: , , % ,299 9, , % ,

) ,

境 新一45‐88/45‐88

1 Web [2] Web [3] [4] [5], [6] [7] [8] S.W. [9] 3. MeetingShelf Web MeetingShelf MeetingShelf (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Web MeetingShelf

11モーゲージカンパニー研究論文.PDF

環境影響評価制度をめぐる法的諸問題(4) : 米国の環境影響評価制度について

石屋製菓のクライシス・マネジメント考 : 地域貢献型レピュテーションを信頼回復に生かす

Core Ethics Vol. : - NICU : : - A B C D


Vol.57 No

JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 122 Vol.31 No.22011

02 比較教育社会学.indd


,,,,., C Java,,.,,.,., ,,.,, i

FUJII, M. and KOSAKA, M. 2. J J [7] Fig. 1 J Fig. 2: Motivation and Skill improvement Model of J Orchestra Fig. 1: Motivating factors for a

WASEDA RILAS JOURNAL : :

...v.q.....r C

1 1 tf-idf tf-idf i

パナソニック技報

佐野先生投影資料

FA

_−Ö“ª

56 56 The Development of Preschool Children s Views About Conflict Resolution With Peers : Diversity of changes from five-year-olds to six-year-olds Y

JR4 JR 3 JR4 KUSUKI, Yukio JR 4 JR JR JR JR JR JR JR , ,530/90 17/ JR



ODA NGO NGO JICA JICA NGO JICA JBIC SCP

本文/AZ204P

越智59.qxd



01ⅢⅣⅤⅥⅦⅧⅨⅩ一二三四五六七八九零壱弐02ⅢⅣⅤⅥⅦⅧⅨⅩ一二三四五六七八九零壱弐03ⅢⅣⅤⅥⅦⅧⅨⅩ一二三四五六七八九零壱弐04ⅢⅣⅤⅥⅦⅧⅨⅩ一二三四五六七八九零壱弐05ⅢⅣⅤⅥⅦⅧⅨⅩ一二三四五六七八九零壱弐06ⅢⅣⅤⅥⅦⅧⅨⅩ一二三四五六

金/金

- March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade

Core Ethics Vol. a

46

IR0036_62-3.indb

H22H23 4.

:

19 Systematization of Problem Solving Strategy in High School Mathematics for Improving Metacognitive Ability

取引銀行の破綻が企業経営に及ぼす影響について-阪和銀行破綻の事例分析-

Vol. 48 No. 4 Apr LAN TCP/IP LAN TCP/IP 1 PC TCP/IP 1 PC User-mode Linux 12 Development of a System to Visualize Computer Network Behavior for L

Core Ethics Vol. QOL N N N N N N N K N N

評論・社会科学 84号(よこ)(P)/3.金子

対朝鮮人絹織物移出と繊維専門商社の生産過程への進出

Vol. 48 No. 3 Mar PM PM PMBOK PM PM PM PM PM A Proposal and Its Demonstration of Developing System for Project Managers through University-Indus

untitled


/ p p

DOUSHISYA-sports_R12339(高解像度).pdf

Ł\1,4.ai

Transcription:

1 2 3 (1) (2) (3) 4 1 (1) (2) (3) (4) (MediCure) (5) 5 2 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) 6 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 7 59

60

1 10 20 2,000 2 3 3 4 20 5 61

6 7 CSR( ) 8 9 10 11 12 DOWA 13 DOWA DOWA 62

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 63

23 24 25 26 27 1 28 64

29 30 1 BtoB BtoC 31 ( ) 32 65

1896 ( 29 ) 100 ( ) ( ) 2 66

2 ( ) 30 1980 PGA PGA( ) 4( ) 1 4 1 2 3 3 2 4 PGA 2 67

15 J&J ( QOL Quality of Life ) 200 300 7 200 60 10 33 34 68

( ) 3 PGA 35 69

3 ( ) 4 3 70

3 3 3 4 71

MediCure QOL 36 1934 20 30 2000 72

20 30 2 3 20 100 4 ( 5) 5 73

( ) 1980 1990 ( ( )R&D ) 37 4 ( ) 6 3 3 74

Q10 1000 20 6 75

( ( ) ) 38 2006 40 2006 2,700 (2014 3,600 ) 1 2,000 3,000 39 7 40 76

Why FUJIFILM Because FUJIFILM 1 7 CM 77

15 30 ( ) ( ( ) 2016 5 31 2016 7 1 ( ) ) 41 78

4,000 7,000 1,500 2011 7,000 100 100 2 2 2 79

2 42 80

43 81

4 44 45 BtoB 82

40 5 10 2 2 83

( ) ( QOL ) (QOL ) ( ) ( ( )R&D ) ( ( ) ) ( ( ) ( ) ) 1 100 2009 2 1986 7 1984 3 105 1996 59-85 4 2000 5 2009 6 2004 PHP 2010 7 Today Vol.34 2005 9-11 144 2011 47-68 8 2011 9 2013 84

10 2016 11 12 100 (2003) 2010 13 DOWA (2014) 61 11 59-65 14 2003 15 1 2002 2 13 16 17 2009 18 (2009) ( )( ) 1-6 19 (2002) : Diamond 8, pp. 48-59. 20 Michael Goold and Andrew Campbell (2002) Desperately Seeking Synergy, Harverd Business Review, August, pp. 96-109 ( (2002) Diamond Harvard Business Review 8, pp. 96-109). 21 22 23 1-23 2006 24 James, G. M.(1991) Eexploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning, Organization Science 2(1) 71-87 25 3 6 2016 2 26 85

26 / / / 2009 Chatterjee.P., (2012), The role of varying information quantity in ads on immediate and enduring cross-media synergies., Journal of Marketing Communications. Vol.18,No3.July 217-240. Simberova.I.,(2010), Synergy in marketing management-challenge for innovation of industrial company offer. Economic & Management 783-791. Ghannay.J. and Mamlouk.Z (2012), Synergy between competitive intelligence and knowledge management-a key for competitive advantage. Journal of intelligence studies in business 2. 23-34. W.Chan Kim and Renee Mauborgne Blue Ocean Strategy, Harvard Business School Press, (, 2015 ) 27 1999 28-4 2014 29 Christensen, C. M. and M. E. Raynor, The Innovator s Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2003. (, 2003 ) 30 (2014) JR gazette 72 1 43-46 31 R.K.Yin.(1994),Case Study Research, Sage Publications, ( 2 2011 ) 2015 32 100 100 100 80 86

33 2015 7 17 34 2015 7 17 35 2016 6 21 36 2016 6 21 37 2016 4 4 38 2016 5 10 39 2016 4 4 40 2016 5 10 41 2016 5 30 42 1988 43 44 45 2000 1 (2007) 2 (2014) - 4 3 (2016) 4 (2008) (5) 33-44 5 (2011) 45(1) 79-92 6 (1988) 7 ( )(1999) 8 (1996) (576) 59-85 9 (2005) Today (34) 9-11 10 (2006) MOT 1-23 11 (2011) (144) 47-68 87

12 (2012) (21) 71-91 13 (2015) 14 (2016) 19 3-16 15 ( ) (2015) 16 (2004) 17 (2009) 18 (2013) 19 (2015.2.23) IMPACT (http://www.sekaikeizai.or.jp/active/article/150223takai.html) 20 (2009) ( )( ) 1-6 21 (2013) 60(10)63-71 22 (2014) 61(11)59-65 23 (2014) JR gazette 72(1) 43-46 24 (2015) 5 1 285-292 25 (2016) 6 108-126 26 (2010) PHP 27 (2002) : Diamond 27(8) 48-59 28 (2003) 29 (2009) 30 (2008) 1 31 (2000) 32 (2001) 33 (2011) 34 (1997) 99 95-111 35 (2002) Harvard Business Review 27(8) 60-71 88

36 (2014) 37 (2000) 1 Chatterjee.P(2012),. The role of varying information quantity in ads on immediate and enduring cross-media synergies, Journal of Marketing Communications 18(3),217-240 2 Christensen, C. M. and M. E. Raynor, The Innovator s Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2003. (, 2003) 3 Chunxia.Y&Wong,T.N(2014), A supplier pre-selection model for multiple products with synergy effect, International Journal of Production Research 52(17),5206-5222 4 Flynn,B.B & Flynn,E.J(2005), Synergies between supply chain management and quality management:emerging implications, International Journal of Production Research 43(16),3421-3436 5 Ghannay.J.C&Mamlouk.Z.B.A(2012), Synergy Between Competitive Intelligence and Knowledge Management a key for Competitive Advantage, Journal of Intelligence of studies in Business 2,23-34 6 Goold, M. Andrew, C.(1998). Desperately Seeking Synergy, Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 131-143. ( Harvard Business Review 27(8), 96-109, 2002) 7 James, G. M. (1991), Organizational Consultants and Organizational Research, Journal of Applied Communication Research 19 20-31 8 James, G. M. (1991), How Decisions Happen in Organizations, Human-Computer Interaction, 6(2), 95-117 9 James, G. M. (1991), Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, Organization Science 2(1), 71-87 10 James, G. M. (1991), Learning from samples of one or fewer, Organization science 2(1) 1-13 11 Liao.Z&Greenfield,P.F(2000), The synergy of corporate R&D and competitive strategies, The Journal of High Technology Management Research 11(1),93-107 12 R.K.Yin.(1994),Case Study Research, Sage Publications.( 2 2011) 13 Simberova.I(2010), Synergy in marketing management challenge for innovation of industrial company offer, Economics&Management 1,783-791 14 W.Chan Kim and Renee Mauborgne Blue Ocean Strategy, Harvard Business School Press(, 2015) 1 (2008) 89

41(10) 34-37 2 (2015) BP (1790) 66-69 3 (2016) 4 2016 3 14 5 (2012) 60(23) 48-51 6 (2012) KPI 21(6) 20-24 7 (2011) 2011 6 8 8 (2009) (1517) 90-95 9 3 6 2016 2 26 10 (2010) 59-142 11 (2009) 12 (2010) (674) 196-201 13 (2016) by AERA 14 (1986) 1986 7 15 (2012) Works 18(5) 46-51 16 (2003) 17 (2002) 1 2002 2 13 18 (2011) 59(7) 37-39 19 ( ) 2012 07 06 20 2009 01 26 21 ( ) 16(7) 54-59 2007 8 90

Abstract It is one of the urgent and important issues to create new businesses in the established companies, because they face problems from maturity of their main and core business. However it is not so easy for them to introduce a new business successfully. They have to overcome many barriers when they transfer their accumulated resources from the established business to a new one and utilize them effectively, which requires changes in the established business system that often lead to conflicts inside their organization. The long-lived company has the strength in its resources based on its long history, but sometimes the history produces inflexibility that obstructs changes in business system. The authors focus three obstacles the long-lived company faces when it introduces a new business. The first one is a barrier in interpretation of the established resources for utilization in a new business. It is difficult for members in core business to evaluate them from a new perspective. The second one is a tall wall between the core and new businesses. The influential core business members seek best solutions for them not for a newly born business unit. The time consciousness for the core business members is shorter than that of new one, so that it is unavoidable to achieve balance between short term stances for utilizing the resources and long term ones for searching a new opportunity using them. The third one is a market barrier when the company brings out its new product to an unfamiliar new market. The case studies elicit hypothesis how to overcome the three obstacles in the process of creating a new business under the strong core business. 91