2016, Japanese Journal of Family Sociology, 28(1): 11-25

Similar documents
Microsoft Word - 表紙hara.doc


雇用不安時代における女性の高学歴化と結婚タイミング-JGSSデータによる検証-

..,,...,..,...,,.,....,,,.,.,,.,.,,,.,.,.,.,,.,,,.,,,,.,,, Becker., Becker,,,,,, Becker,.,,,,.,,.,.,,

Ł×

Japanese Journal of Family Sociology, 29(1): (2017)

Yamagata Journal of Health Sciences, Vol. 16, 2013 Tamio KEITOKU 1 2 Katsuko TANNO 3 Kiyoko ARIMA 4 Noboru CHIBA 1 Abstract The present study aimed to

,,.,,.,..,.,,,.,, Aldous,.,,.,,.,,, NPO,,.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,..,,,,.,

Studies of Foot Form for Footwear Design (Part 9) : Characteristics of the Foot Form of Young and Elder Women Based on their Sizes of Ball Joint Girth

昭和恐慌期における長野県下農業・農村と産業組合の展開過程


社会学部紀要 117号☆/1.野瀬

Jpn. J. Health & Med. Soc., 26(2) (2016)

1 -, XX Total Fertility Rate 1 2

<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>

_念3)医療2009_夏.indd



日本における結婚観の変化―JGSS累積データ を用いた分析―

2 10 The Bulletin of Meiji University of Integrative Medicine 1,2 II 1 Web PubMed elbow pain baseball elbow little leaguer s elbow acupun

.,,..,,.,..,,,,,,,,.,,,.,,,.,,,.,.,,,,,.,,.,.,.,,.,,,.,., --.,,,,,.,,.

29 Short-time prediction of time series data for binary option trade

161 J 1 J 1997 FC 1998 J J J J J2 J1 J2 J1 J2 J1 J J1 J1 J J 2011 FIFA 2012 J 40 56



Highlights Employment increased in Ontario, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. There was little change in the other provinces. More people were employed in c

p _08森.qxd

remained dispersedly in the surrounding CBD areas. However, few hotels were located in the core of Sendai's CBD near the station because this area had


日本看護管理学会誌15-2

公務員人件費のシミュレーション分析

,.,.,,.,,.,,,,,.,,,.,.,,,.,,.,,,,,,,.,,.,,.,,,,.,,,,,,.,,.,,.,.,,,,,,.,,,,.

Core Ethics Vol.

10-渡部芳栄.indd


<8ED089EF8B D312D30914F95742E696E6464>

) , , ,063 6,555 2)


Bull. of Nippon Sport Sci. Univ. 47 (1) Devising musical expression in teaching methods for elementary music An attempt at shared teaching

:- Ofer Feldman,Feldman : -

I

2


未婚者の恋愛行動分析 : なぜ適当な相手にめぐり会わないのか

udc-2.dvi

40B: Satoshi Shimai 1 and Shigehiro Fujimoto 2 1 Center for Liberal Arts and Education, Minami-Kyushu University, Miyakonojo,


高齢期における幸福感規定要因の男女差について―JGSS-2000/2001統合データに基づく検討―

13....*PDF.p

先端社会研究所紀要 第9号☆/2.島村



評論・社会科学 124号(P)☆/1.鰺坂

NINJAL Research Papers No.8


Experimental and Clinical Studies of Pregnant Hypertension Takashi SHIMAZU Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka City University Medical Scho

生活設計レジメ

44 4 I (1) ( ) (10 15 ) ( 17 ) ( 3 1 ) (2)

I II III 28 29



生駒山麓の遊園・観光開発計画の蹉跌 - 日下温泉土地を中心として -

i JR NPO NPO 18


在日外国人高齢者福祉給付金制度の創設とその課題

Visual Evaluation of Polka-dot Patterns Yoojin LEE and Nobuko NARUSE * Granduate School of Bunka Women's University, and * Faculty of Fashion Science,

CA HP,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,

II

Fig. 1 Trends of TB incidence rates for all forms and smear-positive pulmonary TB in Kawasaki City and Japan. Incidence=newly notified cases of all fo

8y4...l

16_.....E...._.I.v2006

総研大文化科学研究第 11 号 (2015)


LAGUNA LAGUNA 10 p Water quality of Lake Kamo, Sado Island, northeast Japan, Katsuaki Kanzo 1, Ni

04-01_論文(荻野基行)new.indd

関西における地域銀行について

<31322D899C8CA982D982A95F985F95B65F2E696E6464>

-March N ~ : National Statistical Office,n.d., Population & Housing Census Whole Kingdom National Statistical Office,, Population & Housing C

山陰研究横組み/論文廣嶋

企業価値重視、効率化経営の時代到来へ

24 Depth scaling of binocular stereopsis by observer s own movements

NINJAL Research Papers No.3

Juntendo Medical Journal

”Лï−wŁfl‰IŠv‚æ89“ƒ/‚qfic“NŸH

untitled

2 ( ) i



2 94

12 Vol. 12, No Benner 8 ICU 1 2 ICU Krippendorff, K ICU 5


% 95% 2002, 2004, Dunkel 1986, p.100 1

J No J. J


グローバル化時代における日本の労働市場と留学生をめぐる考察

Vol. 52 No ,332,000 1,638, ,774 8 A ,11, II. A. % % B. 500 A A N=353

„h‹¤.05.07

JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Creative Scientific Research Understanding Inflation Dynamics of the Japanese Economy Working Paper Series No.7 日本家計の消費 貯蓄 労働プロ

untitled


Transcription:

要約 1970 2 1970 1 2016 28 1 11 25 The Demographic Transition of Japan and the Future of Regional Society Toshihiko Hara Abstract Although the aging and decreasing population is a historical consequence of demographic transition, the real nature of the present crisis consists of the below-replacement fertility rate and the migration of younger members of society seeking higher education and better employment opportunities in large cities. Historical observation shows that an expanding lifespan and survival rates at reproductive age could minimize the risk of childbearing; but even if the theoretical fertility rate met the reproductive level, women s views may remain unchanged. This made a timing shift that began in the second half of the 1970s and increased the age of marriage and childbearing, which escalated to the emergence of below-replacement fertility. Prefectural data for 2010 show a negative correlation between the percentage of those pursuing higher education at age 18 and age-specific marriage also birth rates at age 20 24, where most women are still in higher education or are newly graduated. In contrast, they indicate a positive correlation at age 30 34 and older, where they try to catch up on delayed marriage and childbearing. Thus the critical condition for the recovery of replacement fertility is to change the cost/benefit balance of childbearing toward a plus value in regional communities. Key words: demographic transition, family reproduction strategy, regional revitalization School of Design, Sapporo City University, 1 Geijutsu-no-mori, Minami-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 005 0864, Japan E-mail: t.hara@scu.ac.jp 2016, Japanese Journal of Family Sociology, 28 1 11 25 11

I. Kaufmann 2005 2011 1970 44.3 42.8 1891/1898 1950 57.7 61.0 2006 2010 79.5 86.3 2060 84.2 90.9 2012a 65 30 15 65 15 64 100 80 1 1 2 1925 5.10 1 3 1.65 1950 3.65 1.50 1975 1.90 0.907 2012b 2010 1.39 0.669 2060 1.35 0.652 2.08, 1.00 70 2013 1.43, 0.69 40 100 4 2015 2015 1, 1921/1925 2005 2006 2010 2012b 2015 2060 2012a 1 12

5 II. 6 45 50 50 2 2 4 100 1970 2 2 2 70 1.5 7 3 1911 1915 4 2 1956 1960 1 3 NRR 1 1 50 105 0.4878 4 1921/1925 5 1926/1930 6 1935 1936 50 1925 1930 1940 50 24 12 2006 1925 2010 2012b 2 13

1890 1960 1965 1970 18 2006 67 2055 18 12 315 1 2 3 4 3 2 1970 1 8 1 III. 1. 2014 14

20 39 2040 2010 5 3 9 2. 1 20 24 0.01 30 34 35 39 30 34 35 39 30 2010 30 3. 2005 30 30 1 2010 15 49 15 19 20 24 25 29 30 34 35 39 40 44 45 49 0.019 0.004 0.033 0.061 0.029 0.010 0.003 0.001 0.020 0.003 0.026 0.062 0.032 0.011 0.003 0.001 0.018 0.004 0.035 0.061 0.027 0.009 0.002 0.001 0.044 0.004 0.037 0.103 0.084 0.043 0.015 0.005 0.044 0.003 0.030 0.098 0.086 0.043 0.014 0.005 0.044 0.004 0.040 0.105 0.084 0.043 0.015 0.005 0.041 0.005 0.037 0.089 0.096 0.047 0.008 0.000 0.039 0.004 0.026 0.073 0.092 0.049 0.009 0.000 0.042 0.005 0.041 0.096 0.098 0.046 0.008 0.000 2010 2010 15

1 1 2010 2010 4 2008, 2009 2010 5 10 4 25 29 0.657 35 39 0.785 40 44 0.283 35 39 5 1.15, 0.031 1.88, 0.479 40 4. U I 2010 11 5 16

35 39 16.714, 0.6178 r 0.786 0.0202 r 0.142 2010 2010 5 35 39 2010 20 24 0.60, 0.54 0.30 6 7 25 29 0.23, 0.20 0.12 30 34 0.40, 0.23 0.09 40 44 0.36 6 2010 18 15 19 2 20 24 25 29 8 5. 3 0.698 0.001 30 SMAM 29.4 29.8 50 9.0 14.0 1.47 1.27 17

5 5 2010 2010 2010 6 2010 20 24 61.654, 0.29 r 0.54 47.776, 0.0922 r 0.30 7 20 24 2010 0.20, 1.41 0.06, 0.14 18

2 2010 1 2010 15 19 20 24 25 29 30 34 35 39 40 44 45 49 0.30 0.57 0.58 0.71 0.44 0.07 0.24 0.35 0.53 0.09 0.47 0.52 0.45 0.44 0.15 0.26 0.65 0.70 0.38 0.03 0.16 15 19 20 24 25 29 30 34 35 39 40 44 45 49 0.30 0.60 0.23 0.40 0.28 0.04 0.25 0.35 0.54 0.12 0.09 0.21 0.36 0.29 0.15 0.30 0.20 0.23 0.23 0.15 0.18 15 19 20 24 25 29 30 34 35 39 40 44 45 49 0.24 0.74 0.48 0.16 0.11 0.07 0.11 0.36 0.55 0.34 0.07 0.56 0.64 0.31 0.25 0.71 0.37 0.33 0.12 0.00 0.05 2 2010 15 19 20 24 25 29 30 34 35 39 40 44 45 49 0.18 0.37 0.49 0.56 0.24 0.08 0.20 0.49 0.47 0.09 0.30 0.43 0.36 0.46 0.21 0.38 0.48 0.61 0.26 0.08 0.24 15 19 20 24 25 29 30 34 35 39 40 44 45 49 0.18 0.40 0.20 0.40 0.23 0.13 0.25 0.49 0.49 0.11 0.03 0.21 0.36 0.42 0.21 0.41 0.08 0.02 0.06 0.05 0.05 15 19 20 24 25 29 30 34 35 39 40 44 45 49 0.16 0.57 0.43 0.08 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.54 0.60 0.36 0.01 0.49 0.43 0.13 0.12 0.57 0.40 0.22 0.05 0.03 0.01 2010 2010 2010 0.06 2010 4 3.7 8.7 8.1 4 30 34 35 39 IV. 1. 20 39 50 19

2010 2010 2010 8 2010 3 SMAM 0.698 29.5 10.4 1.41 0.698 29.8 14.0 1.27 0.698 29.4 9.0 1.47 0.001 0.39 5.0 0.20 5 15 49 SMAM: singulate mean age at marriage 5 50 2010 2010 4 15 49 15 19 20 24 25 29 30 34 35 39 40 44 45 49 1,071,229 13,495 110,956 306,910 384,385 220,101 34,609 773 1,111,319 13,958 125,029 332,445 392,035 214,778 32,353 720 40,090 463 14,073 25,535 7,650 5,323 2,256 53 984,523 12,176 79,772 252,156 367,358 232,317 39,838 906 86,706 1,319 31,184 54,754 17,027 12,216 5,229 133 3.7 3.4 12.7 8.3 2.0 2.4 6.5 6.8 8.1 9.8 28.1 17.8 4.4 5.6 15.1 17.2 5 5 15 49 2010 2010 2010 20

1 2014: 22 24 20 39 95 1 30 50 25 0.5 0.5 12.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 3 10 1 12 20 39 2.08 25 39 1 30 3 10 1 2010 1.47 2.08 70.7 0.7 30 0.5 0.7 0.35 3 1 65 50 2008 2. 1 2 1 1980 21

2 2 2010 1.47 1.27 3 U I 20 39 3 1 10 2 TFR: Total Fertility Rate 15 49 age-specific birth rate CTFR: Cohort Total Fertility Rate 34 PTFR: Period Total Fertility Rate 3 0 22

50 105 100 2.07 NRR: Net Reproduction Rate 0.70 70 1 30 30 4 2005 1.26 2014 1.43 30 40 20 5 Kaufmann 2005=2011; Hara 2014 6 well-being 2002: 4 2011 7 1970 1977 50 1 2 3 4 1890 1901 1905 5 1928 1932 2.20 1965 1.93 1.84 3 1890 1.70 1901 1905 2.77 1928 1932 1.96 1965 1.63 1.41 8 14 2012c, d 18 34 6.8 8 4.1 35 45 49 45.1 0 20 7 1977 23

2.61 2.17 2.42 2.07 9 DID 3 10 15 19 0 20 24 0.52 40 44 0 45 49 0.22 15 19 0 35 39 0.48 40 44 45 49 0.22 11 2011 3 18 12 20 39 3 * 23330173 23 25 26285128 26 28 2008, 43: 21 35. 2009, 45: 21 33. Hara, Toshihiko, 2014, A Shrinking Society: Post-Demographic Transition in Japan, Series: Springer Briefs in Population Studies, Tokyo: Springer. Kaufmann, Franz-Xaver, 2005, Schrumpfende Gesellschaft, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. F. X., 2011, 2012a, 23 2011 72 2060 24 1 326 2012b, 2012 324 2012c, 22 14 I 29 2012d, 22 14 II 30 2015, 2015 HP, 2016 1 http:// www.ipss.go.jp 2015a 22 5. 5 20 2016 1 http://www.e-stat.go.jp/sg1/estat/list.do?lid=000001101824 2015b 22 6 22 5 20 2016 1 http://www. e-stat.go.jp/sg1/estat/list.do?lid=000001101739 2015, 26 2014 HP, 2016 1 www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/jinkou/kakutei14/.../00_ all.pdf 2014 24

2015 225 238 2016 1 https:// www.e-stat.go.jp/sg1/estat/gl08020103.do?_togl0802010 3_&tclassID=000001028870&cycleCode=0&requestSender =dsearch 2002 2015 HP, 2016 1 http://www.policycouncil.jp/ 2008 2006 1 2015 22 5 2 4 5 15 20 2016 1 http://www.e-stat.go.jp/sg1/estat/ List.do?bid=000001034991 2011 25