1 ( ) (1) (2) Pattern 1 (P1)// Pattern 2 (P2) (V1 = V2) (alternation) (SPRAY-PAINT alternation/ hypallage) (1) (2) P1: (Z ) X Y V1 P2: (Z ) X Y

Similar documents
( ) ( ) Modified on 2009/05/24, 2008/09/17, 15, 12, 11, 10, 09 Created on 2008/07/02 1 1) ( ) ( ) (exgen Excel VBA ) 2)3) 1.1 ( ) ( ) : : (1) ( ) ( )

x y 1 (Frame Semantics: FS) [1, 2, 3, 4] ( ) ((semantic) frames) FS Berkely FrameNet (BFN) [5, 6] (Japanese FrameNet: JFN) [7, 8] [9, 10] BFN BFN/JFN

1.1 [35] [35] : kkuroda/papers/smmc-in-a-nutshell. pdf ac.jp/ kkuroda/papers/ reply-to-nabes

i


Wide Scanner TWAIN Source ユーザーズガイド

助詞「に」の定量的分析の試み


Corrected Version NICT /11/15, 1 Thursday, May 7,

els08ws-kuroda-slides.key



44 4 I (1) ( ) (10 15 ) ( 17 ) ( 3 1 ) (2)

生活設計レジメ

I II III 28 29


o 2o 3o 3 1. I o 3. 1o 2o 31. I 3o PDF Adobe Reader 4o 2 1o I 2o 3o 4o 5o 6o 7o 2197/ o 1o 1 1o


03山本雅子.indd

178 5 I 1 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) ( 2 )

untitled

philology : philology linguistics : a. langue b. c. d. a. langue competence b. parole performance 1

Grice (1957) S x p S A x 1. A p 2. A S 1 3. A S 1 p (intention-based semantics) S p x (Strawson 1964; Grice 1969; Schiffer 1972; Harman 1974; Bennett

...C...{ ren

a n a n ( ) (1) a m a n = a m+n (2) (a m ) n = a mn (3) (ab) n = a n b n (4) a m a n = a m n ( m > n ) m n 4 ( ) 552

ii


untitled

i

AccessflÌfl—−ÇŠš1

11/27/2003 ( ) 1 UC Berkely FrameNet (FN) ( Frame Semantics (FS) Lexical Unit (LU) Commercial Transaction Fram

2


33 (2016), 105 Abstract Keywords CAP Vol. 9 ( ) pp : : : :

86 7 I ( 13 ) II ( )


第 1 章 :はじめに 本 論 文 は 接 続 語 ( 節 と 節 文 と 文 を 結 ぶもの)について フレーム 意 味 論 に 基 づいた 記 述 手 法 の 有 効 性 を 示 すことを 目 的 としている 接 続 語 が 結 んでいるものはフレームである と 規 定 することで 接 続 語

入門ガイド

14_‰G.indd

, , % :

@081807ヨコ/石山玲子 209号

<4D F736F F F696E74202D C835B B E B8CDD8AB B83685D>

第1部 一般的コメント

ACS37_04咸.indd

i

言語文化論集24巻2号/07田中聡子

SC-85X2取説


untitled

表1票4.qx4

福祉行財政と福祉計画[第3版]

新たな基礎年金制度の構築に向けて

第1章 国民年金における無年金

したがき

PSCHG000.PS

untitled

T T T T A 0 1 A 1 A P (A 1 ) = C 1 6 C 8C 3 = 15 8, P (A ) = C 6 C 1 8C 3 = 3 8 T 5 B P (A 1 B) = =

1. interlanguage 1970 (phonology) morphology syntax Hymes 1972 (communicative competence) Interlanguage Pragmatics Blum- Kulka, House, & Kasper, 1989


橡ミュラー列伝Ⅰ.PDF

( 23 )

白井学習法(1).ppt


II III I ~ 2 ~

中堅中小企業向け秘密保持マニュアル


PR映画-1

- 2 -


1 (1) (2)



2006 No.110

しろうさぎ43号_cs5.indd

untitled

II

これわかWord2010_第1部_ indd

パワポカバー入稿用.indd

これでわかるAccess2010


provider_020524_2.PDF

福岡大学人文論叢47-3

‰gficŒõ/’ÓŠ¹

「産業上利用することができる発明」の審査の運用指針(案)

平成18年版 男女共同参画白書

ÿþ

g. *The fence hits easily. Levin : ff break e fg bc d a. Tony broke the window (with a hammer). b. #Tony broke the hammer against the window. c. *Tony

2 (S, C, R, p, q, S, C, ML ) S = {s 1, s 2,..., s n } C = {c 1, c 2,..., c m } n = S m = C R = {r 1, r 2,...} r r 2 C \ p = (p r ) r R q = (q r ) r R

On the Relation between the Deictic Use and the Non-deictic Use of the Japanese Demonstratives SATOSHI KINSUI* This paper addresses the status of deix

.,.,..,? 2.,.?.,...,...,.,.,.,.,,..,..,,.,,.,.,..,..,....,.,.,.,?,...,,.... Dr.Hener, i

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

( š ) š 13,448 1,243,000 1,249,050 1,243,000 1,243,000 1,249,050 1,249, , , ,885

56 56 The Development of Preschool Children s Views About Conflict Resolution With Peers : Diversity of changes from five-year-olds to six-year-olds Y

298

x, y x 3 y xy 3 x 2 y + xy 2 x 3 + y 3 = x 3 y xy 3 x 2 y + xy 2 x 3 + y 3 = 15 xy (x y) (x + y) xy (x y) (x y) ( x 2 + xy + y 2) = 15 (x y)

(1) (2) (1) (2) 2 3 {a n } a 2 + a 4 + a a n S n S n = n = S n

コーパスからの構文頻度の抽出と辞書への活用 : 現状と課題 大羽良 1. はじめに 2. 構文とは 2.1. Goldberg (1995, p1) Particular semantic structures together with their associated formal expres

fi„‚å-‰³‹ç−w„¤‰ƒ‰IŠv48Ł\1-4.ai

_01野口.indd

19 Systematization of Problem Solving Strategy in High School Mathematics for Improving Metacognitive Ability

Transcription:

1 ( ) 1 1.1 (1) (2) Pattern 1 (P1)// Pattern 2 (P2) (V1 = V2) (alternation) (SPRAY-PAINT alternation/ hypallage) (1) (2) P1: (Z ) X Y V1 P2: (Z ) X Y V2 1.1.1 : (1) P2 (3) : (3) [ X [ X [ X ] ] ] [ Y ] [ V2 ] (4)-(7) X, X, X [X, Y, V1 = ] (6a, b) (3) [V2 = ] [V2 = ] (6b) 1) (5) (4) X, Y, V2 = () a. P1: ** [ X ] [ Y ] b. P2: [ X ] [ Y ] (5) X, Y, V2 = () 1) (6a) {,,... } V1 a. P1: * [ X ] [ Y ] b. P2: [ X ] [ Y ] (6) X, Y, V1 = ( ) a.? [ X ] [ Y ] b. * [ X ] [ Y ] (7) X, Y, V2 = () a. P1: [ X ] [ Y ] b. P2: * [ X ] [ Y ] 1.1.2 1: (6a, b) [V2: V2 = ]? ( (5) V2 = ) 2: (8) a. (6a) Y X (GET X WITH Y, BUY X FOR Y ) b. (6b) X Y (SPEND Y ON X, PAY Y FOR X )? 3: ( )? V1 V2? 4:

2 2? 1.1.3 ( 4) : (9) P1/P2 () C V1 = V2 V1 = V2 a. E1: P1 P2 P1: (Z ) X Y V1 P2: (Z ) X Y V2, b. E2: P1 P2 P2: (Z ) X Y V2 P1: (Z ) X Y V1 E1, E2 C1, C2 (10) : P1, P2 M ( ) 2) R1: P2 P1 *E1 R2: P1 E1 R3: P1, P2 E0 R4: P2 E2 R5: P1 P2 *E2 3.2.4 (11) 4 Necker Cube (Necker Cube Model for Syntactic Alternations) (12) (e.g., [14]) C1 2) (Optimality Theory) [1] C2 (13) Necker Cube C1 P2: X Y V2 (semantic attraction) ( (constructional polysemy) ) (14) C2... 2 2.1 2.2 3 A [14, pp. 105 106] 2.2.2 2.2 [14] 2.1 E1: P1 P2 E2: P1 P2 2.1.1 E1: P1 P2 E0: P1 P2 (15) E1: P1 P2 a. P1: { i., ii. b. P2: { i., ii. * (16) E1: P1 P2 a. P1: {i., ii. } b. P2: { i., ii.?? (17) E1: P1 P2 a. P1: { i., ii. } { i., ii., iii. * b. P2: { i., ii. } { i., ii. *, iii. (18) E1: P1 P2 a. P1: { i., ii.?*, iii. * { i., ii., iii., iv. * b. P2: { i., ii., iii. { i., ii. *, iii. *, iv.

2 3 (19) E1: P1 P2 a. P1: { i., ii. * } b. P2: { i., ii.? } (20)?E1: P1 P2 a. P1: { i., ii.?* b. P2: { i.?, ii. 2.1.2 : *E1, *E2 (21) *E1: P1 P2 a. P1: { i., ii. b. P2: { i. *, ii. * (22) *E2: P1 P2 a. P1: { i. *, ii. * b. P2: { i., ii. (23) *E2: P1 P2 a. P1: { i., ii. } { i. *, ii. *, iii. } b. P2: { i., ii. } { i., ii., iii. } 2.2 2.2.1 E2: P1 P2 E2: P1 P2 E1: P1 P2 (24)?E2: P1 P2 a. P1: { i.?, ii. } { i., ii.?* } b. P2: { i., ii.?? } { i., ii. * } (25)?E2: P1 P2 a. P1: { i., ii. } { i., ii. } b. P2: { i.?*, ii. * } { i. *, ii. * } (26) *E2: P1 P2 a. P1: () 3) b. P2: * () (27) E2: P1 P2 [NB. (20) P2 ] a. P1: { i., ii.?, iii. * } b. P2: { i., ii., iii.? } (28) *E2: P1 P2 a. P1: { i. *, ii. * } b. P2: { i., ii. } (29) E2: P1 P2? a. P1: { i.?, ii.??, iii. * 4) } b. P2: { i., ii.???, iii. (30) E2: P1 P2 a. P1: { i.??, ii.?, iii. { i.?, ii., iii., iv. b. P2: { i., ii., iii. } { i., ii., iii., iv. 2.2.2 E1: P1 P2 E2: P1 P2 1 2 sense [3, 4, 5] (31) E1: P1 P2 a. P1: { i. 1, ii.?*, iii., iv. * } b. P2: { i. 1, ii., iii. *, iv. ** } (32) E2: P1 P2 a. P1: { i.??? 2, ii.??, iii. *, iv. } b. P2: { i. 2, ii., iii. *, iv.?* } 1 2 3 4 4) 3)

3 4 5) (33b) [] (33) E0: P1 P2 a. P1: () 1 b. P2: (*) 1 (34) E2: P1 P2 a. P1: * 2 b. P2:? 2 (35) E2: P1 P2 a. P1: * 2 b. P2:? 2 (36) E2: P1 P2 a. P1: * 3 b. P2: 3 (37) a. P1: * 4 b. P2: 4 2.2.3 (38) E2: P1 P2 a. P1: { i.?, ii., iii., iv.?? } b. P2: { i., ii., iii., iv. (39) E1: P1 P2? } a. P1: { i., ii. b. P2: { i.?, ii.?? (40) E2: P1 P2? a. P1: { i., ii. * b. P2: { i., ii. (38) (40) Y (38a), (39a), (40a) [Y ] [Y ] 5) 3 = 4 3 3.1 3.1.1 1 [14, p. 126 ( )] : 1: 6) spray load clear, wipe 3.1.2 2 [14, p. 111 ( )] : 2: pour fill () XXX ((41) [= (29)] ) (41) 6) [14, p. 110 111 ()] : fill (28a) [= John filled the glass with water] (28b) [= *John filled water into the glass] ( (28b) fill (28b), pour fill X with Y fill Y into X ). [ ]

3 5 pour XXX fill XXX XXX XXX pour fill Z Y X 7) X Y Z Y [8] 3.2 3.1.1, 3.1.2 () 3.2.1 1 pour fill? (underspecification) () 3.2.2 2 8) 7) X Y Z (X:, Y ;, Z: ) [Y :, X:, Z: ] 8) (Pinker ) (Chomsky ) 3.2.3 3 9) (38) E2: P1 P2 Y (e.g.,,, ) 3.2.6 (24) (27) (22) P1: *X Y P2: X Y (23) P1: *X Y P2: X Y 10) 3.2.4 4 E1: P1 P2, E2: P1 P2 E0: P1 P2 [14, p. 116] : [14, p. 116]? 11) 9) 10) X Y X X : (42) a. 100 10 { i., ii., 110 b. 100 10 { i., ii., 110 E1, E2 E1 E2 11)

3 6?? (cf. (18)) : (43) E1: P1 P2 a. { i., ii., iii. b. { i., ii. *, iii. * } (44) E2: P1 P2? a. { i.?, ii.?*, iii. } b. { i., ii. *, iii. * } (45) E2: P1 P2 (46)?? a. { i.?*, ii.?*, iii.? b. { i., ii. *, iii. * } a. { i.???, ii.??, iii.? b. { i.?*, ii. *, iii. * (47) E1: P1 P2 a. { i., ii.?*, iii. } b. { i.?*, ii. *, iii. * (48) E1: P1 P2? a. { i., ii.?*, iii. (disturbing factors) (systematicity fallacy) [10, p. 90] b. { i.?*, ii. *, iii. * P1: X P2: X X = X = (45) Y X (48) X Y (e.g.,,, ) 3.2.5 : (49) R1: P1 R2: P1, P2 P2 E1: P1 P2 R3: P1, P2 E0: P1 P2 R4: P1, P2 P1 E2: P1 P2 R5: P2 R = R1 R5 R1, R5 (interpretational potentials) = ( ) 12) 12) ( ) (constructions) X, Y (collocation)

4 / Necker Cube 7 3.2.6 5 E1: P1 P2, E2: P1 P2 13) E1: P1 P2 E2: P1 P2 E2: P1 P2 E1: P1 P2 (51) X P2 P1 (50) a. P1: { i. *, ii. } b. P2: { i., ii. * } (51) a. b.?? Y X (27) [ X ] [ Y ] (24) [ X ] [ Y ] P2 X 14) 2.2.3 2.2.3 P1 P2 3.2.7 6 (54a) walk walk (e.g., (54b)) ( ) (54) a. He walked a dog to the park. 3.3 b. A dog was walking in the park. Necker Cube / (Necker Cube Model/Hypothesis for Syntactic Alternations) ( ) 4 / Necker Cube Necker cube 4.1 : (55) / Necker Cube : Necker Cube 15) () ( ) (attractors) [11, 12, 9] [13] 13) E1: P1 P2 E1: P1 P2 14) (27) [ X ] [ Y ] (24) [ X ] [ Y ] Y (52) a. a. (53) a.?* b.?? c. : (figure/ground reversal) () 15) Rubin s Vase, Duck Rabit The bottle is half full/empty

4 / Necker Cube 8 4.1.1 : (55) : (56) () i. ii. () iii. P1, P2 / M(P1), M(P2) ( 16) ) iv. M(P1), M(P2) (Langacker [7] (semantic accommodation) ) [4] v. 4.2 4.2.1 X,Y X,Y 1 10 A1, A2,..., *D1, D2, *E1, E2 ( *D1, *E1 ) 16) [15, 16] 1 Div X Y P1 P2 A A1 A2 B > B1 B2 C C1 C2 D < *D1 D2 E *E1 E2 P1: (Z ) X Y V1, P2: (Z ) X Y V2 V 4.2.2 1, 2 1 B3 ( 1) 2 G3 ( 2) V* V** V[i] ( ) [4, 5] 4.3 P1, P2 P1, P2 1. 2. 3. { A, B, C, D, E, F }5, 6 P1 P1 P2 2 { G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N }5, 6 P2 P2 P1 P2 { G3 }, { K3, 5, 6 }, { L3 }, { M3 } { G, K, L }3 V2 V2 X, Y V2 4.4 : 1: B3, K3 {,, } X

5 : 9! " ' ( ) * +, -./012345 678-L@MNNMB 67;-L@MNMB 6789:;<=:;>?@AB7;9@C D! 67;9:;<=:8>?@ AB7;9@CD! 678E;9:8<=:8>?@AB7;9@CD! 6789:8<=:;>?@AB7; 9@CD! OPH:MQRH:MSTG:M-UH: STG:MijH: kjh lmg:mntg:mohg: VG7!@:MWH:MXYH8:MFTZK [G7!@:M\]^7!@:M_G:M`a: bh:mcg:mdg:meg:mfa:mg hg pyh:mqg:mrg:msg: FTZK[G7"@ tu^:mvw^:mxh7!@^:myh G7%@ ^7!@:Mz]^7!@:M{H^:M\] ^7"@:M]YH^^7!@:M G^^7#@: }~mg:mmg:m G^7!@:M YH^:M ƒg^7!@ 67;9:8E;<=:;>?@ AB7;9@CD"F-. GH0IJK # $ 678E;-L@M MB78E;-L@ ƒƒa:m H:M YH: ˆu:M H:MŠa: H:MŒ :MŽa 6M MB7;-L@ % & 6M MB78-L@ 1 P1: X Y V1! ' ( ) * +, -. /012345634789:;01 789<="?@0!93ABCD0!93AEF D0!9 /012345634 789:;047 89<=" /0423456347 89:;047831 29<=" GFD0!93AHI @ /0423456347 /042345634789: 89:;04783429 ;01789<=" <=" JJ /012315634789: ;01789<=" JJ /012315634789 :;04789<=" /01>4231>45634 789:;04789< =" " # $ % &?@0"93ABCD0"93AEF D0"93AKDL0"93AMNDL3 ODL3APQL3ARDL0"93 SEL0"93AT@0"93AUE L0$93AENDLL0"93AV@ LL0$93AWX3AYZ@L0"93 WX3 KD0#93 [@0!93 \]D0!9J3A^EFD 0!93A_`D0!93Aa` D0"93A bc@0!93 _`D0"93AV@0"93Ad @0"93AeD3Afg@ 0"93Ah@3AiCD3AjZ kd3a^efd0$9j ^EFD0%9J3 lgmnd oq pkd3aqrskd3 tud3aavw@d3 xx0!93ayzr] D3 Q ND3 [@0"93 }FD3A~@3 [@0"93A^EFD 0"93A_`D0"93Aa` D0"93Abc@0"9 @3A ND13A `D3 ƒ}fd0!93a\]d 0"93A E m@3agfd 0"9 X ^EFD0#93AUE 0%93 xx0"93a{@ 2 P2: X Y V2 V1 V2 2: 5 : (57) (58) (59)

B 10 (parallel distributed semantics) 17) (60) ( ) (61) A A.1 18) (evoker) [5] ( ) [14, pp. 105 106] 19) : (62) : a. [ :],, (), /,, /, b. [ :],, c. [ :] /,, /,, /,,,,,, d. [:] e. [:], /,,, f. [ :], g. [:],, h. [:], A.2 (63) a. [:],, 17) Distributed Semantics PDP (distributed representation) Distributed Morphology [6] Halle Marantz Multi-moduler Morphology? 18) Mental Space [2] 19) b. [:],,, : (64) a. [:],,, b. [/:] (* ),,, [/] B B.1 (65) a. P1: { i.??, ii.?*, iii. # } b. P2: { i., ii.?, iii. } (66) a. P1: { i.??, ii. *, iii. # } b. P2: { i., ii., iii. } (67) a. P1: { i., ii. } b. P2: { i. *, ii. * } (68) a. P1: { i., ii., iii. *, iv.?* b. P2: { i. *, ii. *, iii., iv.? B.2 (69) E1: P1 P2? a. { i., ii., iii. (?? ) b. { i., ii., iii. * (?? ) (70) E1: P1 P2? a. { i.?, ii.?*, iii.?? b. { i. *, ii.?*, iii.??

11 (71) E2: P1 P2 a. { i. *, ii.??, iii. * b. { i. *, ii., iii.??? (72) E1: P1 P2? a. { i.?, ii., iii. b. { i. *, ii., iii.?* (73) E1: P1 P2? a. { i.?, ii., iii.? b. { i. *, ii., iii. * B.3 (74) a. P1: { i., ii., iii. { i., ii. b. P2: { i., ii., iii. { i., ii. (75) a. P1: { i., ii. { i.?, ii.?, iii. * b. P2: { i., ii. { i., ii., iii. B.4 (e.g., ) (76) E2: P1 P2 a. { i., ii., iii.?? } { i., ii., iii., iv. * } b. { i., ii., iii. } { i., ii.??, iii. *, iv. } B.5 (77) a. P1: { i., ii. { i. b. P2: { i., ii. { i.?? } (78) a. P1: { i., ii. { i. } b. P2: { i., ii. { i.?? } (79) a. P1: { i.?, ii.?*, iii. } { i., ii.?* b. P2: {i., ii.?*, iii. } { i., ii. (80) a. ()({ i., ii. }) { i., ii. } a. ()({ i., ii. }) { i., ii. } b. ()({ i., ii. }) { i., ii. } b. ()({ i., ii. }) { i. *, ii. } [1] D. Archangeli and D. T. Langendoen. Optimality Theory: An Overview. Blackwell, 1997. [2] G. R. Fauconnier. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985. [3] C. J. Fillmore. Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea, editor, Linguistics in the Morning Calm, pages 111 137. Hanshin Publishing, Seoul, 1982. [4] C. J. Fillmore. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6(2):222 254, 1985. [5] T. Fontenelle, editor. FrameNet and Frame Semantics. Oxford University Press, 2003. A Special Issue of International Journal of Lexicography, 16 (3). [6] M. Halle and A. Marantz. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser, editors, The View from Building 20, pages 111 176. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993. [7] R. W. Langacker. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press, 1987. [8] S. Pinker. Learnability and Cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1989. [9],, and. :. In, page 38, 2004. [http: //clsl.hi.h.kyoto-u.ac.jp/ kkuroda/ papers/nakamoto-et-al-cogpsy20% 04-Original.pdf].

12 [10].. In, editor, ( 3 ), pages 79 153., 2003. [11],, and.. In 21, pages 190 191, 2004. [12],, and.. In, editor, 4, pages 133 269., 2005. [ : http: //clsl.hi.h.kyoto-u.ac.jp/ kkuroda/ papers/roles-and-frames.pdf]. [13],,, and. : x y. In 22, pages 253 55 (Q 38), 2005. [ : http: //clsl.hi.h.kyoto-u.ac.jp/ kkuroda/ papers/frames-attract-readings-% jcss22.pdf]. [14], editor. :., 2001. [15].., 98, 1990. [16].., 19(5):76 87, 2000.