橡AIMRモノグラフ(荻島).PDF



Similar documents
OECD Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. Mottla and Utkus Rooiji et al. Atkinson et al. MacFarland et al. Elton et al. Tang et al. Benartzi and Thaler Br

大学における原価計算教育の現状と課題


autocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] (A)


Ł\”ƒ1PDFŠp

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step

日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析

Web Stamps 96 KJ Stamps Web Vol 8, No 1, 2004

...v..&.{..&....

No.3 14

46 RIM 2007 Vol.7 No HSBC WTO 2006

A5 PDF.pwd

CW3_AX094D06.indd

ワークショップ「国際財務報告基準(IFRS)と企業行動:IFRSアドプションのインパクト」の模様

わが国証券市場、証券業界の戦後70年

DI DI

,,.,,.,..,.,,,.,, Aldous,.,,.,,.,,, NPO,,.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,..,,,,.,

23_02.dvi



untitled

<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>

<332D985F95B62D8FAC93638BA795DB90E690B62E706466>

_念3)医療2009_夏.indd

repocost.PDF

BJ-No.7 01 三好秀和.indd

,


表紙_目次.PDF

会社法制上の資本制度の変容と企業会計上の資本概念について

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

<30315F985F95B65F90B490852E696E6464>


高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―

行動経済学 第5巻 (2012)

3 - i

わが国のレポ市場について―理論的整理と実証分析―

BB 報告書完成版_修正版) doc

石屋製菓のクライシス・マネジメント考 : 地域貢献型レピュテーションを信頼回復に生かす

Kyushu Communication Studies 第2号

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─

1 1 1 [2000]

-February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs


02[ ]小山・池田(責)岩.indd

149 (Newell [5]) Newell [5], [1], [1], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [1] 1) 2) ( ) ( ) 3) T : 2 a : 3 a 1 :

untitled


:- Ofer Feldman,Feldman : -

GRIPS National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies GRIPS 3 GRIPS 65 short executive courses GRIP

Vol.57 No

082_rev2_utf8.pdf

RIETI Highlight VOL.25

44-2 宮崎裕介.pwd

Studies of Foot Form for Footwear Design (Part 9) : Characteristics of the Foot Form of Young and Elder Women Based on their Sizes of Ball Joint Girth

2 251 Barrera, 1986; Barrera, e.g., Gottlieb, 1985 Wethington & Kessler 1986 r Cohen & Wills,

明治期の新聞における「鶏姦」報道の特徴 : 『読売新聞』と『朝日新聞』の分析から

Transcription:

CIRJE-J-36 2000 12

(Cross-shareholdings and Equity Valuation in Japan) 2000 12 11 1

Abstract This paper reports our extensive study on the cross-shareholdings among Japanese companies and their impact on share prices. We use three alternative indexes to measure the extent of stable ownership of individual companies. To investigate the impact of cross-shareholdings on share prices we combine an EVA-type valuation model and analysts earning forecasts of Nomura Research Institute. We find a significant positive relation between share price and one of the three indexes of stable ownership, but not the other two. We give an interpretation of this result from the perspective of managerial incentives in relation to the ownership structure of Japanese companies. 10 2

2002 3 1 3 PER 4 2 EVA 1980 P/E P/B 1 P/E P/B 1990 1980 P/E 50 P/B 10 90 P/E [1992] 1 2001 3 2 [1993] [1994] 1986-1992 3

P/E P/E P/E 6 1 P/E French/Poterba[1991] P/E 1989 53.7 32.6 2001 3 4

2 3 34 3 Mark Fedenia Cross-holding occurs when listed corporations own securities issued by other corporations 4 5

69.1%1978 3 31.6%2000 3 5 71.7 FRB, Flow of Funds 98 9.9% 1978 3 30.9%2000 3 23.7%2000 3 6 7 McDonald[1989] 1 75 24.2 75 A B B A A B 100 B A A,B 100 100 0 A B B A A B 100 B A A,B 00+0 A 100 B A 50 150 100 +50 50 A 50 A 50 B 100 A,B 150 2 5 1996 3 27.5 6 1999 10.0 12.4 1999 14.1 18.6 7 Bohren, O and D. Michalsen[1994] 3% 16% 47% 6

(1) (2) (3) 20 A B 1,000 20 A B 1,000 20 20 2 20 2030% 3 7

211 2 50% 3 10. 8 9 10 8 50 50 9 10 10 8

1 11 NTT 11 h (t2) h(t2)=h (t2) h (t1) D2=h (t2)/h (t1) h(t1)=h(t2)/d2 h(t0)=h(t1)/d1 D1=h (t1)/h (t0) 9

98 3 99 3 90 3 1 12 A B PA PB N A B B A A PAr B PBr 1 CA B 1 CB A PBN A CAN PBN B PAN CBN PAN PA PB 12 [1990] [1994] 10

PACAN CAN PBN PB NPA N PBCBN CBN PAN PA NPB N PA PAPB PB A B PA N PB N PACANCANPB NPA N PBCBNCBNPA NPB N PA PAPB PB 1 EPS P/E 11

P/E P/E 13 P/E P/E P/E P/E P/E P/E P/E / 14 P/E P/E P/E P/E P/E P/E P/E P/E P/E P/E 15 16 13 [1989] Ikeda[1992] P/E 14 [1988] 15 Fedenia, M., J. E. Hodder and A. J. Triantis[1994] 16 Bohren, O and D. Michalsen[1994] 12

P/B P/B P/B P/B [1988]80 P./E P/B P/B 90 DDM P t = i= 1 1 E[ Dt+ i ] i ( + r ) e E(D) t+i e DDM EBO EBO 17 DDM 17 Frankel, Richard M., and Lee, Charles M. C. [1998]Frankel, Richard and Charles M. C. Lee[1995] 13

ROE DCF P B 2 ROE e P t = B t + i= 1 E [( ROE r ) B ] t+ i e i e (1 + r ) t + i 1 B P / B t t = 1+ i= 1 E [( ROE r ) B ] t+ i (1 + r ) e i e B t t + i 1 P/B 18 P/B P/B P/B 2 P/B P/B P/B P/B ROE P/B EBO P/BEBO P/B P/B P/B EBO ROE 18 P/B P/B P/B P/B 14

19 ROE PBR.EBO ROE0 ROE ROE1 ROE e ROE ROE PBR.EBO1 1.36 ROE0 re ROE1 re PBR. EBO1 = 1+ + (1 + ROE0) 2 1+ r e ( 1+ r ) e PBR.EBO2 e ROE ROE PBR.EBO2 5.44 PBR.EBO2 PBR.EBO1 ROE1 re PBR. EBO2 = PBR. EBO1 + (1 + ROE0) (1 + ROE1) 2 (1 + r ) r e e e 20 21 ROE ROE PBR.EBO1 PBR.EBO2 ROE 19 20 P/E 20 5 21 Frankel and Lee[1998], Abarbanell and Bernard[1995] 15

PBR.EBO PBR.EBO ROE ROE ROE AOC PBR.EBO2 AOCE ROE BOCD ACE BCD ROE ROE AOC ROE BOC ROE EBO 16

EBO PBR EBO PBR ROE EBO EBO ROE ROE 9 EBO 22 ROE ROE ROE ROE P/E ROE ROE PBR PBR ROE 22 17

Cor(Average)1 12 Cor(March) 3 Total PBR PBR P/B( 9 EBO ) PBR R 2 23 80 90 P/B 4 1 Cor(Average)1 12 Cor(March)3 Total 18

P/B P/B P/B P/B 1,0 23 P/B 90 P/B 1997 R 2 23 21 20 19

R2(Average): 1 12 R 2 R2(March): 3 R 2 80 R2(Average): 1 12 R 2 R2(March): 3 R 2 P/B 20

R2(Average): 1 12 R 2 R2(March): 3 R 2 P/B ROE PBRa+bROE0+cROE1+dLN(ME)+e 21

PBR P/B ROE a+broe0+croe1+dln(me)+e +f P/B ROE PBRa+bROE0+cROE1+dLN(ME)+e +f P/B ROE ROE PBRa+bROE0+cROE1+dLN(ME)+e +f 22

1 PBR ROE PBR PBR ROE PBR 23

McConnell/Servaes[1990] [2000] Berle/Means[1932] Jensen/Meckling[1976] Morck/Shleifer/Vishny[1988] [2000] 24

25 PBR.EBO [2000] PBR N= PBR ROE

ROE ROE 1 ROE ROE 2 ROE PBR( ) ROE PBR PBR 26

PBR PBR 1996 1996 1996 27

28

1999 3 44.1 1 28.2 16.3 90 1998 P/E ROE EBO P/B 1996 1996 2000 3 18.6 29

[1992],,, vol.30, no.9, pp.7-26. [1989],,, no.18, pp.4-15. [1993], vol.31, no.6, pp.19-32. [1990],,,. [1991], (1)(6), 1991 7 12 18., P. [1997],,. [2000],, no.7, pp.41-55., [1994],, Japan Research Review, pp.4-44. [2000],,, vol.38, no.2, pp.72-93. [1988], PER,,. [1995],,. Bohren, O. and D. Michalsen [1994], Corporate Cross-Ownership and Market Aggregates: Oslo Stock Exchange 1980-1990, Journal of Banking and Finance, vol.18, no.4, pp.687-704. Fedenia, M., J. E. Hodder and A. J. Triantis [1994], Cross-Holdings: Estimation Issues, Biases, and Distortions, The Review of Financial Studies, vol.7, no.1, Spring, pp.61-96. Ferguson, R. and N. B. Hitzig [1993], How to Get Rich Quick Using GAAP, Financial Analysts Journal, vol.49, no.3, May/June, pp.30-34. Frankel, Richard M., and Charles M. C. Lee [1998], Accounting valuation, market expectation and cross-sectional returns, Journal of Accounting and Economics, pp.283-320. French, K. R. and M. Poterba, [1991], Were Japanese stock prices too high?, Journal of Financial Economics, vol.29, pp.337-363. Ikeda, Masayuki [1992], Price/Earnings Ratios with Reciprocal Owership, Financial 30

Analysts Journal, July-August. Kobayashi, H., Y. Endo and S. Ogishima [1993], New Directions in Japanese Banking Relationships, NRI Quarterly, 02-1 Spring. McDonald, J. [1989], The Mochiai effect: Japanese corporate cross-holdings, The Journal of Portfolio Management, Fall, pp.90-94. Ogishima, Seiji [1995], Empirical Test for the Mochiai Effect in Japan, International Society of Financial Analysts, vol.7, no.2, pp.8-9. Ogishima Seiji [1994], Recent Trends in Japanese Stock Cross-Holding, NRI Quarterly, Nomura Research Institute, 03-3, pp.82-101. Sinha, R. [1998], Company Cross-Holdings and Investment Analysis, Financial Analysts Journal, vol.54, no.5, Sep./Oct., pp.83-89. 31