[ ]青砥(責).indd



Similar documents
FA

日本国憲法における「社会福祉」

DV DV

アメリカ連邦最高裁における公教育像の考察(二)

No.7, (2006) A Survey of Legislation Regarding Environmental Information in Europe and Japan IWATA Motokazu Nihon University, Graduate School of

社会学部紀要 117号☆/1.野瀬

2 56

Huawei G6-L22 QSG-V100R001_02


1970年代以降の韓国禁止歌と韓国社会

Conseil de prud'hommes , , , , , , , ,524 82,366 81,43581,983 6,261 5,028 4,351 14,36

橡ボーダーライン.PDF


16_.....E...._.I.v2006


„h‹¤.05.07

Powered by TCPDF ( Title 米国における障害者を対象とした野外教育 : 米国の障害者政策と障害者教育の変遷との関連 Sub Title Outdoor education for people with disabilities in United

172309_XP_天理大学学報第227輯(体育編)


41-1 松本・廣津・吉村.pwd

基本操作ガイド

EU EU ECHR EU ECHR EU EC/EU EEC EC European Court of Justice, ECJ EU EC EC Solange I ECJ Solange II ECJ EC

評論・社会科学 91号(よこ)(P)/2.三井

操作ガイド(本体操作編)

.D.q

操作ガイド(本体操作編)

Ronald Dworkin 2 economic approachlofty approach ibid., p. ibid., p. 2.1

評論・社会科学 119号(P)☆/1.福田

在日外国人高齢者福祉給付金制度の創設とその課題

18巻2号_09孫さま03p.indd

MIDI_IO.book


262 F s PRO A Community Investment and the Role of Non-profit Organizations: Present Conditions in the US, the UK, and Japan Takashi Koseki Abstract 1

H1-H4_日本法学_78-4.ai

_™J„û

YUHO

テロリズムの定義


16−ª1“ƒ-07‘¬ŠÑ


みつめて_あなたを.indd

ntv AR05 new/J

基本操作ガイド

〈企業特集:検査機器・試薬・技術の新たな展開〉新規マイコプラズマ抗原検査キット—プロラスト®Myco

CFC BEPS CFC BEPS

IT Information Technology Information and Communication Technology E mail IT -84-

犯罪被害者の情報と報道のあり方

授受補助動詞の使用制限に与える敬語化の影響について : 「くださる」「いただく」を用いた感謝表現を中心に


IEC :2014 (ed. 4) の概要 (ed. 2)

バーゼル4

産業構造におけるスポーツ産業の範囲に関する研究Ⅰ

< F909D96EC2091E633358D862E696E6462>

ISSN ISBN C3033 The Institute for Economic Studies Seijo University , Seijo, Setagaya Tokyo , Japan

Google Social Influences and Legal Issues of Google Street View Hiroshi Takada

ブック 1.indb

- 1 -

untitled

110301_01

ScanFront 220/220P 取扱説明書

ScanFront 220/220P セットアップガイド

海外投資と経営

2 PCIJ ICJ ICJ ICJ ICJ ipso facto ICJ ICJ ICJ ICJ 4 ICJ ICJ ICJ 36 2 ICJ 5 6 ICJ PCIJ ICJ ICJ No


先端社会研究 ★5★号/4.山崎

橡最終原稿.PDF

2

9 1, , , 2002, 1998, 1988,

08_中嶋真美.indd

地方債と地方財政規律

帝京国際文化 第18号 山内久史

大学論集/論考/14

ScanFront300/300P セットアップガイド




101001_01

ユーザーズマニュアル



NEXT FUNDS NASDAQ-100 連動型上場投信

NEXT FUNDS NASDAQ-100 連動型上場投信

NEXT FUNDS NASDAQ-100 連動型上場投信

NEXT FUNDS NASDAQ-100 連動型上場投信


アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて

Y X X Y1 X 2644 Y1 Y2 Y1 Y3 Y1 Y1 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y2 Y3 Y1 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y1 X Lexis X Y X X2 X3 X2 Y2 Y1 Y1

,255 7, ,355 4,452 3,420 3,736 8,206 4, , ,992 6, ,646 4,

19 territorial sea high sea United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea United Nations Treaty Series, Volume1833, p

110115_01

2 146


A5 PDF.pwd

Soc. Env. Sci., Jpn. 31(1): (2018)

A5 PDF.pwd


NEXT FUNDS NASDAQ-100 連動型上場投信

NEXT FUNDS NASDAQ-100 連動型上場投信

Tab 5, 11 Tab 4, 10, Tab 3, 9, 15Tab 2, 8, 14 Tab 1, 7, 13 2

05_fuke.indd

Transcription:

2013 2 14 On the Burqa Ban in the City of Lleida: Judgment of the Supreme Court of Spain of February 14, 2013 AOTO Seiichi On October 8, 2010, the Catalan City of Lleida approved a local ordinance banning the use of integral veils such as the burqa, niqab, and other full-face masks or helmets in public spaces. The Watani Association for Liberty and Justice Asociación Watani para la Libertad y La Justicia, plaintiff/appellant filed an administrative lawsuit in the High Court of Catalonia against Lleida City, arguing the prohibition of the full-face veil violated the protection of human rights. The High Court dismissed the plaintiff s appeal, holding that the ban was in conformity with the local autonomous entity s lawmaking right. The plaintiff appealed the Catalan High Court s judgment to the Supreme Court of Spain. The Supreme Court quashed the original judgment and annulled the ordinance. Such a ban should be stipulated by law because it constitutes a limitation of the freedom to express religious beliefs. In Spain, however, such a law does not yet exist, so that it is not acceptable that fundamental human rights are restricted by ordinances because ordinances are subordinated to laws. The violation of the maintenance of public order, public safety, and the right of the others must correspond to the purpose of the ban. 135

1 2014 1. Lleida 1 2010 10 8 Asociación Watani por la Libertad y La Justicia, Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Catalunya 2011 6 7 394/2010 2 2. 3 4 5 136

21 3. 3. 1 3. 1. 1 20 137

1 2014 1977 20 89 20 3 2007 pp. 96 97 2007 pp. 106 107 3. 1. 2 Sherbert 1963 compelling governmental interest 1 Free Exercise Clause neutral, generally applicable regulatory law 138

Smith 1990 peyote Smith 1 2012 pp. 60 61 1 Establishment Clause Lemon test 3 Lemon Kurtzman 1971 139

1 2014 2012 pp. 56 57 3. 1. 3 The European Convention on Human Rights 2013 p. 14 9 2008 p. 377 The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities 1994 Council of Europe 1998 5 1 2 8 140

2010 Recommendation 1927 3 13 1 laïcité 2009 p. 14 141

1 2014 2004 2 10 ostentatoire 3 15 6 600 10 Financial Times 2010 3 2 7 70 2010 7 13 9 14 8 10 7 Conseil d État 9 laiklik Leyla Sahin 10 2004 4 9 142

Ahmet Arslan 11 12 9 13 143

1 2014 2010b p. 120 3. 1. 4 Leyla Sahin Kervanci 14 2008 12 4 Ahmet Arslam 16 3 16 3 Artículo 16.3 Libertad ideológica y religiosa Ninguna confesión tendrá carácter estatal. Los poderes públicos tendrán en cuenta las creencias religiosas de la sociedad española y mantendrán las consiguientes relaciones de cooperación con la Iglesia Católica y las demás confesiones. 16 3 15 144

1979 16 17 1789 3. 2 18 19 2004 11 5 1998 5 15 145

1 2014 18 2 18 2 16 1 20 16 146

21 El País 2011 1 28 22 100 2.3 65 63 60 55 2010 6 147

1 2014 Badalona El Mundo 2013 4 1 23 3. 3 14 14 24 25 148

4. 2010 p. 16 149

1 2014 9 2 16 9 2 26 150

1 hiyab niqab burqa 2 Sentencia del Tribunal Supremo de Justicia Cataluña 489/2011, de 7 de junio. 3 Sentencia del Tribunal Supremo, Sala de lo Contencioso, STS 693/2013. 4 5 16 1 la necesaria para el mantenimiento del orden público protegido por la ley 6 7 http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d11ac1e0-2598-11df-9bd3-00144feab49a.html #axzz2nbuo0hhn 8 150 1 3 9 3 2010a: 16 10 The Case of Leyla Sahin v. Turkey, Judgment, the European Court of Human Rights Fourth Section, Strasbourg, 29 June, 2004. 11 L affaire Ahmet Arslan et autres c. Turquie, Arrêt, la Cour européenne des droits de l homme deuxième section, Strasbourg, 23 février, 2010. 12 151

1 2014 2008: 31 13 Affaire Ahmet Arslan et autres c. Turquie, Requête n o 41135/98 2010b 14 15 1945 16 Carazo Liébana Carazo Liébana, 2011, p. 54 17 Jefe del Estado símbolo de su unidad y permanencia 56 62 63 64 18 El Tribunal Constitucional 12 5 3 4 4 2 2 15 9 3 3 1 159 19 Communication No. 931/2000, United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Human Rights Committee, January 18, 2005. 20 14 21 152

22 http://elpais.com/diario/2011/01/28/sociedad/1296169203_850215.html 23 http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2013/04/01/barcelona/1364806340.html 24 2009 6 21 2010a p. 808 25 19 20 2011 pp. 210 213 26 2009 p. 16 2010 21 1 18 2007 I 5 106 107 2008 28 32 2012 60 61 2012 56 57 2008 153

1 2014 375 378 2009 COE GEMC 1 10 19 2010a 9 3 131 147 2010b 2010 2 23 49 103 120 2013 96 2013 1 33 2007 I 5 96 97 2011 7 207 223 Carazo Liébana, María José 2011. El derecho a la libertad religiosa como derecho fundamental, Universitas. Revista de Folosofía, Derecho y Política, n o 14, 43 74. 154